The capstone project from semester 2.

1. Drilling Design
Capstone project semester 2
PNGE 491 – team 26
December 21, 2014

2. Reservoir Recap
 OOIP 375 – 675 MMSTB
 Estimated recoverable amount 150 - 270 MMSTB
 Carbonate Reservoir with heavy oil
 Limestone/Dolomite Reservoir
 Drill through Limestone/Shale

3. Drilling Location
 Horizontal Section perpendicular to fault
 Red dot indicates heel with toe towards fault

4. Target Zone
• Net pay average 29’
• Set target depth at TVD-2273’
• Reports of fluid circulation around
1600’ from other wells

5. Considerations throughout
1) Technical Performance
2) Cost
3) Safety Factor
4) Environmental Impact

6. Pressure Window
 After our target zone had been selected we then had to
plan on our drilling fluids and weight. Doing so we
analyzed our sonic logs to create our pressure window.
For pore pressure we assumed 0.465 psi/ft.

7. Mud Design
 9.6 lb/gal density
 Fresh water with granular
bentonite
 450 bbl of mud on location.

8. Cement design
 Use standard 16 lb/gal cement
 5% silica fume to guarantee strength
 10% fly ash to increase workability
 0% free water content present
 183 bbl of cement or 123 Mlbs
 Density should not have a difference exceeding 0.5
lb/gal throughout mixture.

9. Casing design
 Horizontal well with open hole style completion.
 Suitable for production and injection purposes.
1. 16” conductor (65 lb/ft H-40) 0’-60’
2. 10.75” Surface Casing (32.75 lb/ft H-40) MD 0’-1700’
3. 8.625” Intermediate Casing (28 lb/ft H-40) MD 0’-2600’
4. 6.5” Open Hole Lateral MD 2600’-5900’

10. Drill bit program
 Designed simultaneously with casing
 Roller-cone style bits to maximize ft/hr penetration.
 Steel teeth with sealed bearing best for lithology.
1. 14.75” bit 60’-1700’
2. 9.5” bit 1700’-2600’
3. 6.5” bit 2600’-5900’

11. Well Schematic
KOP @ 1700'
2600' MD
2273' TVD
9.5" Hole
8.625" Intermediate Casing
6.5" Open Hole to 5900'
60'
20" Hole
16" Conductor
1700'
14.75" Hole
10.75" Surface Casing

12. Final Price
 As our AFE reported our well will have a final cost of
approximately $1,050,000 dollars.
 Infrastructure pricing to access the well was not taken
into consideration.

13. References
 Perrin, D., Caron, M. and Gaillot, G. (1999). Well
completion and servicing. 1st ed. Paris: Technip.
 Prentice, C. and others, (1970). " Maximum Load" Casing
Design. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 22(07),
pp.805--811.
 Ronaldo, V., Cem, S., Turgay, E. and others, (2003).
Horizontal well design optimization: a study of the
parameters affecting the productivity and flux
distribution of a horizontal well.
 Halliburton RedBook Engineering Tables. April 15,1999.
Halliburton Company.