ICAWC 2011: Ray Butcher - From Herriot to the Present - the Challenges for Vets
1. Challenges for private companion animal vets
(and incidentally also welfare groups)
Ray Butcher ICAWC, RIGA 2011
2. Reflects my own
experiences – largely UK
based
Old enough to remember
the “old days”
Unique position – have
been a high profile vet
“politician” / involved in
welfare charities / a
private practitioner all at
the same time
3. Evolution of companion
animal vet practice in UK
and worldwide
Changing situation in
welfare charities
Parallel evolution but
prejudices perhaps rooted
in the past (esp at local
level)
Stress the need for
collaboration
Pointers for the future
6. Development of
companion animal
practice
Vet nurse training
Changing client
demands and
expectations
7.
8. Massive investment in terms
of money and facilities
Change in attitudes of vets
and staff – women, work/life
balance
Employment and Health and
Safety legislation
Competition
Facing the reality that practice
is a business
9. Emphasis on
positive health care
and prevention
rather than treating
disease
In UK – much of
this done by nurses
10. Trend to specialisation
◦ Species
◦ Disciplines
11. Evolution of Nursing
Profession
Working with other
animal health
professionals –
physios, behaviourists
etc.
Still barriers in some
countries
12. Continued change in
client expectations (not
related to costs only)
Reduced standing of
“professions”
Economic crisis > impact
on own business as well
as clients
13. Not to illicit sympathy!
Stress practice is a
business
This is what we do to
feed our families
Making a profit is
desirable – indeed
essential!!
Difficult decisions
What is best for
welfare?
14. Private registered
Hospital
50 staff
Image important as a
“service provider”
19. Accidents and disease
Positive animal health
Family health
Community Health
20.
21.
22.
23. Well-meaning but
lacking overall plan
Dealing with crises
but doing nothing to
change anything long
term
Care about animals
more than people
Often felt abandoned
by society
24. Thought they could
solve the problem
themselves
Unwilling to work
with others
Own welfare
standards in own
facilities often
substandard
25. Many examples
Become professional >
successful as businesses
Staff make up - range of
professionals -not
necessarily “animal
people”
Alliances > cooperation >
bigger political clout
Educational programmes
essential component
26. Re-homing – not just
numbers but matching
the right dog to the
family
CNR – community
involvement, stressing
aftercare
Every intervention is an
education opportunity
27.
28. Also important
Caring but professional
“Playing the system”
30. VET Local
Practice Charities
1950 - 1985:
Identifying new challenges
Economic pressures
Rapidly changing societal needs
1985 – 2011:
Reality check:
Business plans
Re-focusing aims
and objectives
Professionalism
31. Aims and objectives much in common
Challenges much in common
Much greater cooperation at international /
national level
May still be “in-built prejudices (esp at local
level)
◦ Vets - “Only interested in money”, “Do not care
about animals”
◦ Charities - un-realistic expectations, “mad”, Poor
standards of welfare
32.
33. Promotion of humanity – concern for all living
things (including people)
Professional
Recognise the importance of considering and
working with other stakeholders (including
locals)
“One medicine” philosophy
34.
35. Important concept –
control of whole
population not “strays”
Consider “free roaming”
not stray
Image – “stray” >
unwanted/expendable
36. Free Roaming
Owned dogs
Lost
Owned dogs
abandoned
Owned dogs
wandering
Community
Dogs
Feral
Dogs
37. TOTAL DOG POPULATION
Confined / Controlled Free Roaming
LOST Owned dogs
Returned Lost
Dogs in breeding /
commercial Owned dogs
Abandonment abandoned
supply chain
Owned Re-homing Owned dogs
Dogs wandering
Culture
Community
Education??? Dogs
Feral Dogs
38. Direct physical injury to
humans, their pets or
livestock, and wildlife.
Indirect injury as a result of
road traffic accidents
Reservoir of disease to
humans and their pets
Pollution from faeces, urine
etc
General nuisance - noise
39. Loss of human and
animal life
Fear of the disease
Cost / availability of
vaccination
Cost / availability of
post exposure therapy
(PET)
41. Initial data collection and identification of
major stakeholders
Interpretation of the data and identification of
local priorities
Consideration of potential components of
strategy
Agreement of overall plan, setting aims and
objectives and delegation of tasks
Implementation, monitoring and evaluation
42. Human
NGOs Animals Animal
Health
General Health Ministry Educators
Public Vets
Ministry
Municipality
43.
44. “….. I promise above all
that I will pursue the work
of my profession with
uprightness of conduct and
that my constant
endeavour will be to ensure
the welfare of the animals
committed to my care”.
45. Ensuring animal
welfare is a key
element of our role
Have we risen to the
challenge?
46.
47. Moral obligation
EU – Treaty of
Amsterdam > Legal
obligation
48.
49. Can we argue that this is an area that will
help to build the business?
50.
51. 55,000 human deaths in
Africa and Asia every year –
especially children
100 deaths in children every
day
52. May include owned
animals that are
allowed to wander
Clients or potential
clients
55. Direct involvement
Linked to compulsory
vaccination
Linked to neutering
56. May be compulsory
visit to vet
Marketing opportunity
57. Pet dogs potentially
most productive
Requires vet
involvement
Cost implications
Needs compromise?
58. Responsible Pet
Ownership
Opportunity to
market clinic
59. Moral obligation – care of living things and
promoting humanity
Professional obligation – “animal advocate”
Professional obligation to community – have
expertise to improve public health
60. Professional obligation to clients – have
expertise to protect health of pets
Enhanced image as “carer” will impact on view
of community to clinic
Potential opportunity to market clinic with
increase workload and client base
61. Goodwill
Image
Community
responsibility
Potential increase in
client base
Developing surgical
skills?
Financial gain?
62. More satisfied owner
Healthier dog
Better educated owner
> better potential to
take up vet services
63.
64.
65. Vets and welfare charities have joint role as
part of “community health care team”
66. The need to change the way people behave
Educated public better for animal welfare and
better for vets so “win / win”
68. Owners - “My dog doesn’t bite”
Sponsors &Vets – not keen on negative image
68
69. Problem of
communicating a
“FEAR message”
Witte K. 1996; Cho & Witte, 2005; Gore & Bracken, 2005 69
70.
71. Improved welfare involves educating people
to change their attitudes and behaviour
Can only be successful if multiple
stakeholders in the community work to an
agreed strategy
Each stakeholder group will have their own
agenda
Maybe historical “baggage” – concentrate on
points of common interest / agreement
May need compromises
Must be perceived advantages to get “buy-in”
72. Human
NGOs Animals Animal
Health
General Health Ministry Educators
Public Vets
Ministry
Municipality