2. Introduction and background
Purpose for inception
Objectives
Service provided
Administrative structure
Logistic framework
Evaluation of ICDS
SWOT Analysis
Conclusion
3. Launched on 2nd October 1975
Worls’s largest and most unique programmes for early
childhood development
India’s response to the challenge of
oProviding pre school education on one hand and
oBreaking the vicious cycle of
malnutrition, morbidity, reduced learning capacity and
mortality, on the other.
4. Routine MCH services not reaching target
population
Nutritional component not covered by health
services
Need for community participation
5. To improve the nutritional and child health in the age
group 0 -6 .
To create a system that tackles the proper
psychological, physical and social development of the
child.
to fight the rate of mortality, morbidity, malnutrition
and school drop out.
To have all the various ministries and department work
in a coordinated fashion to achieve policy implementation
and create and effective ECCE system.
To support the mother and help her become capable of
providing necessary nutritional and development needs
of the child and aware of her on needs during pregnancy
6.
7. Beneficiaries of ICDS
Children < 6 years
6 December 2012 JLNH&RC
Pregnant Woman Lactating women
Adolescent Girls
Women in Reproductive
age group (15-44)
8.
9. Services and beneficiaries
Services Target Group Service Provided by
Supplementary
Nutrition
Children below 6 years:
Pregnant & Lactating Mother (P&LM)
Anganwadi Worker and
Anganwadi Helper
Immunization* Children below 6 years:
Pregnant Women
ANM/MO
Health Check-up* Children below 6 years:
Pregnant & Lactating Mother (P&LM)
ANM/MO/AWW
Referral Services Children below 6 years:
Pregnant & Lactating Mother (P&LM)
AWW/ANM/MO
Pre-School Education Children 3-6 years AWW
Nutrition & Health
Education
Women (15-45 years), Children 3-6
years
Pregnant & Lactating Mother (P&LM)
AWW/ANM/MO
6 December 2012 JLNH&RC
12. Effective coverage
Quality of delivery of SN
In general the practice of breast feeding within an
hour of birth is found to be more widespread among
ICDS beneficiaries
ICDS has also positively influence formal school
enrolment
Reduction in early discontinuation among
beneficiaries
16. Evaluation of ICDS
• Conducted by NCAER( National Council For
Applied Economic Research).
• High performing states are- Andhra Pradesh,
Assam, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal
Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, Jharkhand,
Karnataka, Kerala, Tamil nadu, Uttarakhand
and West Bengal.
• Poor performing states are- Bihar, Haryana,
Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh.
17. Evaluation of ICDS
• 49% of eligible group is registered for ICDS
benefits.
• About 64% of children receive SNP out of total
children registered by AWW.
• Around 78% of pregnant and lactating women
and 42% of adolescent girls are recorded in
delivery register.
• Overall 42.5% of AWWs have their own building,
17.4% were in rented building, 17.3% were in
primary school building and 22.9% running in
Panchayat Bhawan, AWW own house.
18. Evaluation of ICDS
• 87% of AWW have drinking water supply, 69%
functional weighing scale.
• About 94% of AWW adequately trained for
preschool education.
• ICDS programme has positive impact on
Immunization coverage at national level.
19.
20. Vast coverage of benefeciaries
Supplementary
Growth monitoring
Prophylaxis against vitamin A deficiency
Control of nutrition anemia and nutrition
< 3 year child weighed a month
Promote Excluding breast feeding
Nutrition and Health education among women
21. Practically children 3-6 Yrs and
Pregnant & Lactating not covered
Irregular food supplies
Quality of Nutrition supplement?
Poor supervision
Lack of community ownership/ participation
Nutrition education only on papers
Children come only for food
22. Lack of co ordination
Inadequate understanding
Gap between sanctioned staff and actually working
ICDS project
Nutritional therapy is not implemented
System referral to the PHC
Infrequent visiting of AWW in home
Weak NHE
Sharing of food between lactating mother and
children
23. A 50% increase in coverage of 0-3 years children
Proper breastfeeding and complementary feeding
24. Lobbying of contractors
Involvement of AWW in multiple government programs
Does not reach out to children upto two years of age
Over emphasis on enhancing food security rather than
ensuring positive nutrition outcomes for children.