4. Objectives of Plant Breeding
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 4
Prime objective is to increase crop yield and improve quality of crop produce
https:// www.agronomy.org/science-news/understanding-genetic-basis-drought-tolerant-crops/Biotech info center
Until recently, our ability to generate allelic diversity in plants was limited to
introduction of variants from domesticated and wild species by breeding via
uncontrolled recombination or the use of chemical and physical mutagens—
processes that are lengthy and costly or lack specificity.
5. Farm To Fork Strategy
• for a fair, healthy and environmentally friendly food system
• new innovative genomic techniques accelerate the development of
bio based products
• may play a role in increasing sustainability along the food supply
chain
• provided they are safe for consumers and the environment while
bringing benefits to society as a whole.
• accelerate the process of reducing dependency of pesticides
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 5
6. Molecular Marker Assisted Selection Breeding
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 6
MAS refers to the use of DNA markers that are tightly-linked to target loci
Assumption: DNA markers can reliably predict phenotype
7. MAS Breeding
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 7
Pros :
• Similar to traditional breeding , not regulated
• Accelerating breeding process
• Easier for stacking multiple traits within the same
cultivar
Cons:
• Must know genomic and genetic background
• Very costly
• False markers
8. Don’t underestimate the power of genetic variability
Classical Breeding by selecting stem, lateral bud, terminal bud, flower cluster, stem & flower, leaf
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra Discover biology 3/e fig 16-9 W WMNorton & Com Inc 8
12. Pros and Cons of Mutation Breeding
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 12
Pros:
• Induction of desirable mutant which is absent in natural plant materials
• Not regulated ecologically, environmentally friendly
• Straightforward phenotypic selection, technically easy
Cons:
• Generally random and unpredictable
• Good mutations come with bad mutations
• Need large mutant pool to identify good one
• Costly and slow
13. Enhancing genetic variability with
mutagens
• Used in the last 70 years for breeding.
• More than 3000 cultivars worldwide
• Many further unwanted (off-site) mutations
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 13
14. High Precision : no or less non-targeted mutations
Traditional Mutagenesis Vs Targeted Mutagenesis
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 14
15. Going “Bio” : Enzymes can do it better
Site-specific induction of DSBs : Natural inheritance is
governed by molecular scissors
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 15
16. Plant GE Toolbox: Edit Delete Move
• Gene editing provides a faster and precise way to create new variation,
dominated by the creation of short insertion and deletion mutations leading
to loss of gene function, due to the dependence of editing outcomes on DNA
repair pathway choices intrinsic to higher eukaryotes.
• Other types of edits such as point mutations and precise and pre-designed
targeted sequence insertions have rarely been implemented , despite
providing means to modulate the expression of target genes or to engineer
the function and stability of their protein products.
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 16
17. Designer Plants
• Custom editing by regulation of repair pathway choices or by
taking advantage of alternative types of DNA repair
• The advent of novel gene editing tools are independent of
DNA double-strand break repair, and methods completely
independent of host DNA repair processes
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 17
18. Precision Breeding
• A plant breeding approach in which a phenotypic trait of
interest is selected by means of identifying a functional
marker that is directly derived from the genomic region of a
trait-controlling gene
• Selections are based on the polymorphic genic regions linked
with a trait of interest
• Availability of genomic resources are of utmost importance
for making FM
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 18
19. The next step : Breeding at the speed of light
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 19
20. CRISPR Loci induce acquired
immunity in bacteria against the virus
infection or plasmid transfer
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 20
21. 3 Options : Precise edits with CRISPR
• Make use of host cell HDR
– Involve a DSB.
– Capable of very large insertions
• Use enzymatic base editing
– No DSB repair. Single base edits typically
• Use prime editing
– No DSB repair. Capable of all edits <80 bases
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 21
22. Gene editing via CRISPR/Cas
• CRISPR/Cas is more efficient and cheaper
• Directed , off-site mutations can be avoided
• Any gene can be targeted
• A row of improved traits introduced in different crops already
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 22
Steps
• Binding with NGG
PAM (spcas9)
• R loop = ds to ss DNA
• sgRNA binding with
homologous
sequence
• Cas9 makes a cut
23. Features of CRISPR/Cas9 GE
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 23
• High precision, high efficiency with unprecedented ability to generate targeted
and specific mutations
• Procedures are identical to genetic modification
• Final products are similar to traditional breeding
• Deactivating one or multiple genes, up/down regulating genes, early pathogen
detection
• Precise modifications using base editors, prime editing and HDR
• Targeted insertion of transgene
25. Genomic double- strand break (DSB) generation is followed by different cellular repair pathways. Error-prone non-homologous
end joining (NHEJ) and microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ)pathways create the majority of mutations throughout the
cell cycle. Homology directed repair (HDR), active in S/G2 phases of the cell cycle, repairs DSB without error.
CELLULAR REPAIR PATHWAY
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 25
28. 31-08-2021 Darshana Patra Chen et al 2019 28
Staggered cuts by SpCas9
– HNH cleaves target strand at - 3 position
– RuvC can make a cut at either -3, -4, -5, or even further
29. Hypothetical model
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 29
Staggered cuts by SpCas9
• HNH cleaves target strand at - 3
position
• RuvC can make a cut at either
-3, -4,-5, or even further
Generation of 1 bp insertion during
CRISPR/Cas9-induced DSB repair
30. Predicting precise edited products
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra Molla et al 2019 30
Prediction of CRISPR/Cas9-induced
mutations
31. Scientific risk assesment of gene
edited plants
• DSB repair is a natural process, mutations occur spontaneously all of the time
• Plants with CRISPR/Cas-induced or spontaneous mutations cannot be discriminated and
are nature-identical
• Classical mutagenized plants are exempted from regulation due to a ‘long safety record ‘
• Edited Plants are at least as safe as mutagenized crops
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 31
32. Out of total cellular repair events..
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 32
33. Precision editing by HDR
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 33
• Coincident error prone NHEJ repair confounds HDR strategies
• Yields a majority of random mutants and a minority of accurate HDR
corrections
• NHEJ occurs in G1/S while HDR occurs in G2/M
• A Cas9-geminin fusion imparts G2/M expression on Cas9
• Biased towards HDR events
34. 31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 34
Published : 8 July 2021
• Here, fast, efficient and reproducible targeted nucleotide substitutions in sugarcane
reported, enabling precise co-editing of multiple alleles via template-mediated and
homology-directed repair (HDR) of DNA double strand breaks induced by the
programmable nuclease CRISPR/Cas9
• Selected gene variants into elite cultivars without crossing and associated linkage
drag.
35. Precise editing by HDR mediated allele
replacement (gene targeting)
• In the GT approach, a DRT is constructed by flanking the desired
sequence modifications on each side by regions of homology to the
target locus, often referred to as homology arms.
• When the DRT is delivered to a target cell and a DSB is
simultaneously induced in the genome, the DRT can be used for
HDR that proceeds via synthesis-dependent strand annealing (HDR
repair in plants see Knoll et al. 2014), resulting in incorporation of
the edits in the genome.
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 35
36. Low HDR frequency in somatic plant cells
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 36
37. Multi allelic precision ns conferred
herbicide tolerance
• Frequency of HDR in somatic cells is negligible, making routine allele replacement at scale in
plants impractical.
• In fact, GT is usually successful in only 0.1–1% of recovered plants.
• Although some of the improvements described below have increased these efficiencies,
surpassing the 10% mark can be considered exceptional.
• In stark contrast, NHEJ repair of targeted DSBs can generate indels with close to 100%
efficiency in some species (Pan et al. 2016; Ueta et al.2017; Lee et al. 2019b; Malzahn et al.
2019).
• This difference is partly due to the restriction of HDR to the late S and G2/M phases of cell
cycle, as opposed to NHEJ which operates in both dividing and non- dividing cells (Mao et al.
2008; Charbonnel et al. 2011).
• Simply put, the main hurdle to effective GT is the need to create conditions under which HDR
is favored over NHEJ.
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 37
38. Strategies to improve HDR mediated genome editing
Manipulation
of DNA repair
pathway
Manipulation
of donor
template
Adding new
functions to
Cas enzymes
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 38
Combinatorial approach
40. Anti Nutritional Factor : Gliadin
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 40
Ingestion of antigenic
compound i.e. foreign
body Gliadin develop auto
immune response, destroy
the vili (absorb nutrients
from food)structure of
intestine
41. Target epitope as antigenic : MALDI-TOF analysis of the gliadin extracts from T545 , T553 and the BW208 wild type.
PBJ : Susana Sanchez-Leon et. al {18 September 2017}
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 41
42. Wild species that are heat
and salt stress resistant
can be transformed into
novel crops
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 42
43. Genetic Engineering
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 43
Pros :
• Fast way to verify gene function
• Precisely modify crop productivity and quality
Cons :
• Necessary to know gene function
• Very costly, complicated procedures
• Heavily regulated
44. Complimentary to Traditional
Breeding : Solution to Linkage Drag
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 44
Linkage Drag - Nightmare for Traditional Plant Breeders
Gene editing can remove linkage drag to create better plants
Never has progenies with good
flavor and better postharvest
quality,diseaseresistant tomato
Breaking genetic linkages by CRISPR/Cas
45. Crop Breeding : towards precision
Genome editing: improving a trait by precisely modifying the target genes or regulatory elements
or rearranging chromosomes in elite varieties.
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra Chen et al 2019 45
46. What makes it Different?
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 46
47. CRISPR Base editing without DNA cleavage
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 47
• Recruit catalytic domains of DNA deaminases
• Use D10A nickase to nick non-edited strand
to stimulate repair
• No DSB
• Nick repair is very accurate and fast
• Can target most disease associated SNPs
48. Prime editing - CRISPR without DNA breaks
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 48
49. Prime Editing - CRISPR without DSB
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 49
• Does not rely on host cell DSB repair to make an edit
• A Cas9 nickase is used to locate and prime the editing
• The intended edit is added to the guide RNA template
• A fused reverse transcriptase incorporates the edit
• Host cell repair incorporates the edit
55. Application of GE Techniques for Crop
Improvement
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 55
56. Most efficient allele replacement methods for
major plant model and crop species
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 56
The choice of BE for each application in order to avoid potentialbystander mutationsand other editing byproducts
should be carefullyconsideredbased on :
• the availabilityof PAM sequence properlypositioned in the target sequence
• size of the editing window
• specificity
Citationsand application of selection refer to the highestachieved editing efficiencyfor the given approach and species.
*Direct selection for the gene editing event, DRT donor repair template
62. Take home message
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 62
• Genome editing requires similar procedures used for Genetic
Engineering (GMOs), yet creates precise mutation in plant genomes
containing non-foreign DNA
• Resulting products are indistinguishable from products of natural
variability or mutagenesis, yet genome edited plants are regulated
case-by-case
• Limitation of genome editing application are plant transformation
pipeline and genome availability
63. References
• Chen, Kunling, et al. "CRISPR/Cas genome editing and precision plant breeding in
agriculture." Annual review of plant biology 70 (2019): 667-697.
• García-Molina, María Dolores, et al. "Gluten free wheat: are we there?." Nutrients 11.3
(2019): 487.
• Oz, Mehmet Tufan, et al. "CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Multi-Allelic Gene Targeting in Sugarcane
Confers Herbicide Tolerance." Frontiers in Genome Editing (2021): 15.
• Sedeek, Khalid EM, Ahmed Mahas, and Magdy Mahfouz. "Plant genome engineering for
targeted improvement of crop traits." Frontiers in plant science 10 (2019): 114
31-08-2021 Darshana Patra 63