Hello Professor and Classmates,
Issue: A mother who is HIV positive has passed the virus to her adolescent child. The mother is refusing to disclose the virus to her adolescent daughter out of fear of ruining the child’s chance at a normal childhood.
Discussion: While the mother has every right to protect her daughter, this is a situation where the daughter is at an age where she should know the truth about her health. This is not an easy situation to deal with by any means and the way this situation is handled will determine the impact that it has on the child’s mental health condition. Although the daughter is not at an age where she can handle her own medical treatment, I believe she has the right to know about her condition. In some cases a minor can consent to treatment but this is often regulated by state and HIPAA defaults to whatever guidelines that are outlined by the state regarding adolescent consent. In the aforementioned situation the child has no clue that they are HIV positive. Most people would conclude that the mother should tell the child because it will help the child cope with being HIV positive early on rather than find out about it later on in life where it will have a greater impact on the child’s mental health. In some cases the doctors may be worried as well about the mother’s reaction if they tell the child that she has HIV. Physician assurances of confidentiality may increase an adolescents’ willingness to disclose information but this may not work out in favor of the physician if they disclose to the child that she is HIV positive (Berlan E. D., Bravender T., 2009).
This scenario is a doubled edge sword because the child has the right to know about her condition and the mother has a right to privacy. The mother is right in her regard to be worried because there is a chance that people will judge her because of her daughter’s condition. Protecting a person’s dignity has been a part of medical practice since the early 1900’s (Elsayyad, A., 1960). I believe the staff could do a better job of explaining the condition to the child so that the mother does not have to but it is the mother’s decision at this time to disclose the information to the child. The mother decisions will have both negative and positive results regardless of her decision to withhold the condition from the child. Making an ethically sound decision in this case is difficult because it is not a decision that can be made on the spot, there are second and third order effects that will take place and they must be accounted for before a decision is made.
Plan of Action: For now, the staff should abide by the mothers wishes and treat the daughter as they have been, but they should come up with a plan of action with a counselor, psychologist or psychiatrist to sit with the mother and weigh the pros and cons of withholding the condition from the child. I would recommend and / or take the following actions to assist the family in aforementioned situation. ...
Current Information and Communication TechnologiesWith so much.docx
Hello Professor and Classmates,Issue A mother who is HIV po
1. Hello Professor and Classmates,
Issue: A mother who is HIV positive has passed the virus to her
adolescent child. The mother is refusing to disclose the virus to
her adolescent daughter out of fear of ruining the child’s chance
at a normal childhood.
Discussion: While the mother has every right to protect her
daughter, this is a situation where the daughter is at an age
where she should know the truth about her health. This is not an
easy situation to deal with by any means and the way this
situation is handled will determine the impact that it has on the
child’s mental health condition. Although the daughter is not at
an age where she can handle her own medical treatment, I
believe she has the right to know about her condition. In some
cases a minor can consent to treatment but this is often
regulated by state and HIPAA defaults to whatever guidelines
that are outlined by the state regarding adolescent consent. In
the aforementioned situation the child has no clue that they are
HIV positive. Most people would conclude that the mother
should tell the child because it will help the child cope with
being HIV positive early on rather than find out about it later on
in life where it will have a greater impact on the child’s mental
health. In some cases the doctors may be worried as well about
the mother’s reaction if they tell the child that she has HIV.
Physician assurances of confidentiality may increase an
adolescents’ willingness to disclose information but this may
not work out in favor of the physician if they disclose to the
child that she is HIV positive (Berlan E. D., Bravender T.,
2009).
This scenario is a doubled edge sword because the child has the
right to know about her condition and the mother has a right to
2. privacy. The mother is right in her regard to be worried because
there is a chance that people will judge her because of her
daughter’s condition. Protecting a person’s dignity has been a
part of medical practice since the early 1900’s (Elsayyad, A.,
1960). I believe the staff could do a better job of explaining the
condition to the child so that the mother does not have to but it
is the mother’s decision at this time to disclose the information
to the child. The mother decisions will have both negative and
positive results regardless of her decision to withhold the
condition from the child. Making an ethically sound decision in
this case is difficult because it is not a decision that can be
made on the spot, there are second and third order effects that
will take place and they must be accounted for before a decision
is made.
Plan of Action: For now, the staff should abide by the mothers
wishes and treat the daughter as they have been, but they should
come up with a plan of action with a counselor, psychologist or
psychiatrist to sit with the mother and weigh the pros and cons
of withholding the condition from the child. I would recommend
and / or take the following actions to assist the family in
aforementioned situation.
Develop a plan of action with a counselor, psychologist or
psychiatrist:
1. Plan of Action: I would speak with a counselor to determine
the best approach to use to convince the mother that explaining
the condition to the child is in the child’s best interest. When a
child understands the seriousness of their health condition they
are more apt to abide by the rules outlined by the doctor. The
daughter in this scenario may began to understand that it is
imperative she takes her medicine. There are a few benefits that
the mother can obtain from this as well because she has been
living with the condition and is able to manage it as an adult. A
counselor will be able to help the family understand that there
3. are other families living with the condition and are able to live
a normal life. The may be able to place them in contact with
focus groups as well to help gain support as well. I believe that
the aforementioned plan of action is a solid enough approach
for the staff to take, at the least it will be a start in what I
believe is the right direction.
2. Counseling: The mother and daughter will both need to
undergo counseling. Initially the family may attend counseling
together but each party will eventually need to undergo one-on-
one counseling with a licensed practitioner in order to address
their individual struggles with living HIV positive.
3. Recommend Focus Groups: I would research and find focus
groups so that the family can have support. It is important to
interact with individuals who understand delicate conditions
enough to not judge individuals for their conditions. These
focus groups may include activities like sporting events and
other social events with other people or families who are HIV
positive. This is likely very important for finding dates as well.
4. AIDS: The last and likely the most important aspect of this
treatment is to let the child know that it is not her fault that she
has this condition (Mabuka J., Nduati R., Odem-Davis K.,
Peterson D., Overbaugh J., 2012). The mother will need to have
this addressed as well because she may continually blame
herself for the child’s condition when at the end of the day it is
a condition that a lot of people suffer from regardless of how it
was contracted. Making the best of a bad situation is the most
important aspect that the family should take from this plan of
action (just not in those words).
I do not believe that I need more information that what was
provided. I believe that the mothers concerns are normal. I
believe that her reasoning for with-holding information form the
child is logical to a point, but is not in the best interest of the
4. child. I believe that the plan of action is ethical and that no
further information is needed.
V/R
Carl D. Nelson Jr.
Berlan E. D., Bravender T. (2009). Confidentiality, consent, and
caring for the adolescent patient.
Curr Opin Pediatr. (Links to an external site.)Links to an
external site.
450-6. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32832ce009.
Elsayyad, A. (1960).
"Informed Consent for Comparative Effectiveness
Trials" (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
. New England Journal of Medicine. 370: 1958–1960.
doi (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
:
10.1056/NEJMc1403310 (Links to an external site.)Links to an
external site.
.
Mabuka J, Nduati R, Odem-Davis K, Peterson D, Overbaugh J
(2012). Desrosiers RC, ed.
"HIV-Specific Antibodies Capable of ADCC Are Common in
Breastmilk and Are Associated with Reduced Risk of
Transmission in Women with High Viral Loads" (Links to an
external site.)Links to an external site.
.
doi (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
:
10.1371/journal.ppat.1002739 (Links to an external site.)Links
to an external site.
.
PMC (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
5. 3375288 (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
.
PMID (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
22719248 (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
.
ReplyReply to Comment
COLLAPSE SUBDISCUSSION