Theory Development Institution Affiliation: Course: Date: Basic Model Issue: Carbon Monoxide in the workplace Varibale1: Goal Variable Variable 3 Variable 2 The basic model displays the relationships that exist between the variables and their connection to the main issue which is carbon monoxide in the workplace. It is evident that the goal variable is the controlling factor on the basis that it dwells on the nature of the workplace. The other variables such as the early discovery of exposure levels of carbon monoxide in the workplace effects cost incurred in conducting quality checks and reducing carbon monoxide in the workplace calls for consistent quality checks simply depend on the goals variable to be successfully executed (Gay & Urquhart, 2016). 2 Relations Between Carbon Monoxide In The Workplace And The Selected Variables Issue: Carbon Monoxide in the workplace Variable1: Goal Variable- Nature of the workplace affects the levels of exposure to carbon monoxide Variable 2: Early discovery of exposure levels of carbon monoxide in the workplace effects costs incurred in conducting quality checks Variable 3: reducing carbon monoxide in the workplace calls for consistent quality checks The basic model depicts the relationships that exist in all the variables and their connection to the main issue which is carbon monoxide in the workplace. In this context, it is evident that both variable 1 and variable 2 and the issue connects to the goal variable that outlines the nature of the workplace and its susceptibility to exposure levels of carbon monoxide (Gay & Urquhart, 2016). The goal variable connects to the issue of carbon monoxide in the workplace on the basis that the office could be facing the danger of emission of the carbon monoxide gas. The goal variable connects with variable2 that denotes that early discovery of the presence of the carbon monoxide in the workplace would affect the costs incurred. In this context, it is quite evident that early discovery of the exposure levels of the toxic gas would determine the nature of the workplace (Gay & Urquhart, 2016). Hence, modalities related to reducing the costs of stamping out carbon monoxide can be idealized. The basic model also outlines how the goal variable is dependent on by variable3 that captures the act of reducing the dominance of carbon monoxide in the workplace. Based on the model, reducing levels of carbon monoxide calls for consistent quality checks. Quality checks come with costs (Gay & Urquhart, 2016). Hence, the earlier the toxic gas is discovered the cheaper the process of conducting quality checks. 3 References Gay, R., & Urquhart, G. (2016).Carbon monoxide–risks at go-karting venues. Chemical Hazards and Poisons Report, 60. Running head: THEORY DEVELOPMENT 1 THEORY DEVELOPMENT Topic Theory Development Institution Affiliation: Date: Variable1 [Goal variable] (Independent variable) Issue (Scientific Concepts Are Built On Th ...

1. Theory Development
Institution Affiliation:
Course:
Date:
Basic Model
Issue: Carbon Monoxide in the workplace
Varibale1: Goal Variable
Variable 3
Variable 2
The basic model displays the relationships that exist between
the variables and their connection to the main issue which is
carbon monoxide in the workplace. It is evident that the goal
variable is the controlling factor on the basis that it dwells on
the nature of the workplace. The other variables such as the
early discovery of exposure levels of carbon monoxide in the
workplace effects cost incurred in conducting quality checks
and reducing carbon monoxide in the workplace calls for
consistent quality checks simply depend on the goals variable to
be successfully executed (Gay & Urquhart, 2016).
2
Relations Between Carbon Monoxide In The Workplace And
The Selected Variables
Issue: Carbon Monoxide in the workplace

2. Variable1: Goal Variable- Nature of the workplace affects the
levels of exposure to carbon monoxide
Variable 2: Early discovery of exposure levels of carbon
monoxide in the workplace effects costs incurred in conducting
quality checks
Variable 3: reducing carbon monoxide in the workplace calls
for consistent quality checks
The basic model depicts the relationships that exist in all the
variables and their connection to the main issue which is carbon
monoxide in the workplace. In this context, it is evident that
both variable 1 and variable 2 and the issue connects to the goal
variable that outlines the nature of the workplace and its
susceptibility to exposure levels of carbon monoxide (Gay &
Urquhart, 2016). The goal variable connects to the issue of
carbon monoxide in the workplace on the basis that the office
could be facing the danger of emission of the carbon monoxide
gas.
The goal variable connects with variable2 that denotes that
early discovery of the presence of the carbon monoxide in the
workplace would affect the costs incurred. In this context, it is
quite evident that early discovery of the exposure levels of the
toxic gas would determine the nature of the workplace (Gay &
Urquhart, 2016). Hence, modalities related to reducing the costs
of stamping out carbon monoxide can be idealized.
The basic model also outlines how the goal variable is
dependent on by variable3 that captures the act of reducing the
dominance of carbon monoxide in the workplace. Based on the
model, reducing levels of carbon monoxide calls for consistent
quality checks. Quality checks come with costs (Gay &
Urquhart, 2016). Hence, the earlier the toxic gas is discovered
the cheaper the process of conducting quality checks.
3

3. References
Gay, R., & Urquhart, G. (2016).Carbon monoxide–risks at go-
karting venues. Chemical Hazards and Poisons Report, 60.
Running head: THEORY DEVELOPMENT 1
THEORY DEVELOPMENT
Topic Theory Development
Institution Affiliation:
Date:

4. Variable1 [Goal variable] (Independent variable)
Issue (Scientific Concepts Are Built On The Metaphors Of
Cause And Effects)
Scientific concepts are majorly dependent on a significant cause
of an experiment. Independent variable draws the attention of
the entire experiment since it measures the level of an
intelligent guess as compared to the already interpreted fact that
is majorly used for comparative analysis. Ideally, an
independent variable is identified as a controlling factor that
determines the value of the scientific concept that any kind of
experiment or science intends to achieve. Successful
experiments rely on the initial cause and objective of a research
that is expected to be original to demystify easier comparison
with other significant considerations of the study. Independent
variable as the determinant with regards to the authority of any
research or an experiment connects with scientific concepts on
the basis of establishing a foundation research question
regarding any analytical work could be conceptualized.
Variable2: (Dependent variable)
The dependent variable connects with the independent variable
on the basis that it draws explanation upon which the
projections of any experiment can be measured. Dependent
variable establishes a baseline that is expected to be consistent
with any result arising from the performance of analytical
research. Fundamentally, it is an idealistic expectation of any
piece research regarding the scientific concept that both
independent and dependent variable follows a similar approach
with a consistent level of uniformity. In this context, any
adjustment per se of the dependent variable may create
ramifications and compromise the expected results. Independent
variable is scientifically proven ideology that the dependent
variable relies on. Changing the causal relationship requires an
adequate mastery of the controlling cause that is measured

5. against the dependent variable. Ultimately is evident that both
the dependent variable and the independent variable functions
concurrently in a bid to make an experiment authentic and
accurate.
References
Trochim, W. M., & Donnelly, J. P. (2008). Research methods
knowledge base. Mason, OH:
Running head: THEORY DEVELOPMENT 1
THEORY DEVELOPMENT
Topic Theory Development
Institution Affiliation:
Date:

6. Variable1 [Goal variable] (Independent variable)
Issue (Scientific Concepts Are Built On The Metaphors Of
Cause And Effects)
Scientific concepts are majorly dependent on a significant cause
of an experiment. Independent variable draws the attention of
the entire experiment since it measures the level of an
intelligent guess as compared to the already interpreted fact that
is majorly used for comparative analysis. Ideally, an
independent variable is identified as a controlling factor that
determines the value of the scientific concept that any kind of
experiment or science intends to achieve. Successful
experiments rely on the initial cause and objective of a research
that is expected to be original to demystify easier comparison
with other significant considerations of the study. Independent
variable as the determinant with regards to the authority of any
research or an experiment connects with scientific concepts on
the basis of establishing a foundation research question
regarding any analytical work could be conceptualized.
Variable2: (Dependent variable)
The dependent variable connects with the independent variable
on the basis that it draws explanation upon which the

7. projections of any experiment can be measured. Dependent
variable establishes a baseline that is expected to be consistent
with any result arising from the performance of analytical
research. Fundamentally, it is an idealistic expectation of any
piece research regarding the scientific concept that both
independent and dependent variable follows a similar approach
with a consistent level of uniformity. In this context, any
adjustment per se of the dependent variable may create
ramifications and compromise the expected results. Independent
variable is scientifically proven ideology that the dependent
variable relies on. Changing the causal relationship requires an
adequate mastery of the controlling cause that is measured
against the dependent variable. Ultimately is evident that both
the dependent variable and the independent variable functions
concurrently in a bid to make an experiment authentic and
accurate.
References
Trochim, W. M., & Donnelly, J. P. (2008). Research methods
knowledge base. Mason, OH:
Week 7 - Discussion: Step 3—Theory Development

8. The next stage of theory development consists of mapping out
the relations between variables. You have already considered
relationships like cause and effect, but now you add further
relationships like timing. The model map also helps to visualize
the relations that you already laid out in your table last week.
To prepare:
·Review Chapters 8 and 9 of your course text regarding theory
search and development.
·Review the Discussion from Week 5, where you began your
theory search.
·Consider how you would create a basic model (similar to
Figure 2.3 of your course text on p. 30) that captures one type
of link between the theory and the issue involving public policy
and administration that you have been examining since Week 4.
With these thoughts in mind:
By Day 3

9. Post a short PowerPoint presentation (2–3 slides) that captures
in a diagram the basic model you created, showing one type of
connection for the issue you selected.
BOOK: Supernumerary Intelligence 2015
Author:
Dickey, John W.
ISBN-13:
978-1-62396-829-8
ISBN-10:
1-62396-829-1
Edition/Copyright:
2015
Publisher:
Information Age Publishing Inc.
Running head: THEORY DEVELOPMENT 1
THEORY DEVELOPMENT
3
Theory Development
Name of Student
Institution Affiliation
Theory Development
In theory development, scientific concepts are built on the
metaphors of cause and effects where there is one that counts as
an adequate explanation while the other as adequate attention.

10. This is analyzed as a cause theory where information processing
is presumed to modulate attention. The cause and effect
elements of a theory reveal the crucial role of the elements in
finding a resolution to a particular problem in any field. As
such, the main goal of theory development is to establish a
causal relationship where a particular action or variable affects
a resultant relationship this paper aims at explaining two basics
elements of cause and effect and their importance to the
concept.
The two basic elements of cause and effect are Independent
variable also denoted as cause and dependent variable denoted
as an effect. These two elements are established through a
criterion that incorporates time ordering, association, as well as
non-spuriousness. While many studies might illustrate the cause
and effect establishment in straightforward criteria, it is
considered by researchers as the most challenging aspect of the
implementation of a theory into a real-world application.
Independent and dependent variables as elements of cause and
effect analysis can be described using certain scientific
examples.
Independent variable acts as a controlling condition that a
researcher changes in an experiment to establish the causal
relationship. The dependent variable, on the other hand, is that
condition that is measurable in a research theory or experiment.
It is usually established by assessing changes in the independent
variable. A good example of these elements in a research study
can be described based on the following scenario; a researcher
was studying the impact of a drug on HIV. The independent
variable will be administering the dosage as well as timing.
Conversely, dependent variable will be the effect of the drug on
HIV/AIDS.
References

11. Trochim, W. M., & Donnelly, J. P. (2001). Research methods
knowledge base