SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 25
Download to read offline
Chris Baugh
chrisbaugh19@gmail.com ~ 757.715.0919 mobile ~ 215.923.4961 home ~ Philadelphia, PA


Objective
Bring a pragmatic and enthusiastic approach to the development, management
and analysis of educational data.

Professional Experience
2010 – Current School District of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
Development Coordinator - Office of Accountability, Assessment & Performance
Targets

Responsibilities & Essential Functions
· Maintain and monitor assessment programs, ensuring data quality in coordination with
the Offices of Educational Technology and Information Technology and outside vendors
and agencies, including counterparts in the Pennsylvania Department
of Education, SchoolNet, CTB/McGraw-Hill and the Data Recognition Corporation,
publishers of the Pennsylvania System of School Assessment (PSSA).
· Author reports on assessment performance, student achievement and other core
accountability indicators, including analysis of Pennsylvania System of School
Assessment (PSSA) and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for several
audiences, such as central offices, schools, regions, state and local governments,
media and general public.
· Develop and maintain accountability and assessment technologies for use in data
reporting, data processing, and data utilization; MS-SQL, Access, Excel, SPSS.
· Provide staff leadership, professional development and expertise in support of district
projects between multiple district offices as well as with outside agencies.

Key Accomplishments
· Developed PSSA Data Visualization system to improve accuracy of PSSA data
reporting and enrich the analysis of multiple datasets by leveraging lightweight, industry-
standard information technologies for use in the educational management environment.
· Principle architect and project manager for the COMPSTAT reporting system, which
allowed the Office of School Safety (OSS) to improve the accuracy of key school
climate indices; reduced the amount of time spent on-task by OSS staff tasked with
producing routine executive-level reports from several days to a matter of minutes.
· Worked in partnership with the Superintendent's office and City of Philadelphia
technical offices to develop the analytic systems used to identify schools for conversion
to the Renaissance turn-around model using state, local and city datasets; the resulting
report was presented to C-level staff for finalization and adoption.
· Lead author and principle investigator for the district's response to allegations of
testing irregularities that took place in the administration of the 2009 PSSA test;
developed an analytical model that further refined existing data analysis from the testing
vendor and produced actionable findings for future investigations into testing irregularity.
2008 – 2009 PA Dept. of Education/Delaware County Intermediate Unit, PA
Educational Technology Coordinator, School Improvement Project

Responsibilities & Essential Functions
· Coordinate with School Improvement team to support technical efforts on the grant-
funded Pennsylvania Department of Education (PDE) contract; to include developing
data analysis resources and delivery of key data reports to multiple stakeholders.
· Coordinate data sharing projects with PDE Bureau of Accountability and Assessment
and PDE contractors, to include IU13-PVAAS team and SAS Business Analytics.
· Design and maintain assessment reporting systems on NCLB data metrics; Adequate
Yearly Progress (AYP), Pennsylvania System of School Assessment (PSSA),
Pennsylvania Value-Added Assessment System (PVAAS).

Key Accomplishments
· Served as the technical representative on several state-level committees related to
Accountability, Assessment, and Data Reporting.
· Authored professional development and online training supports for the 1000+ school-
teams using the Getting Results school improvement model; to include several on-
demand training videos, dynamic data tools, and structured organization of
communication & training materials.

2007 – 2008 Suffolk Public Schools, Suffolk, VA
Supervisor of Technology, Information Services & Systems

2000 - 2007 Suffolk Public Schools, Suffolk, VA
Technology Integrator, Information Services & Systems

Responsibilities & Essential Functions
· Coordinate with departmental administrators to meet information services and support
needs for 21 schools and 3 district offices; to include daily information services
operations, student information systems, educational research, and strategic planning.
· Administer accountability systems for local, state and federal reporting.
· Develop and manage technical aspects of the local assessment systems, to include
instrument development, assessment delivery, and performance reporting systems.
· Supervise the Information Services technical team within the district Technology
Center; responsible for coordinating tier 1 to 3 support and training for multiple systems
involving 700+ staff and 15,000+ students.
· Coordinate with administration in the design, analysis and delivery of student
performance data to multiple stakeholders; to include executive summaries and the
public.
· Participate in strategic planning; projects include division-wide online assessment for
NCLB accountability, reporting systems for data-driven decision making, payroll and
human resources application automation, web-based teacher gradebooks, online
student transcripts/course requests.
· Manage technology integration projects between district and vendors while reporting
progress directly to Director of Technology and district executive team.

Key Accomplishments
· Created an online state-standards assessment system that encompassed measuring
student achievement in real-time and reporting performance data for parents, teachers,
principals and central office staff for the purpose of targeted remediation, instructional
and curricular adjustment. The SOLO system (Standards Of Learning Online) reduced
the district's assessment cycles from 1 semester to 1 week while improving the overall
quality of the data and instructional decision-making.
· Created a data warehouse that integrated district data from multiple sources into a
single reporting suite. The result of blending student performance data and
demographic data within the larger context of our organizational data systems (NCLB-
funded programs, special education, transportation, guidance & safety office) gave
administrators access to reporting that supported their decision-making and could be
incorporated into single-year and multi-year studies.
· Personally developed, implemented, trained and supported several core organizational
intranet applications to replace time-consuming manual procedures. Noticeable gains
in data accuracy were made with shorter processing time and improved accountability.

Technical Skills
Enterprise-Level Information Systems: Student Information Systems (including
eSchoolPlus, Pentamation, SASI, ACHIEVE), Online Gradebook-Report Card
(including GradeSpeed), Employee Services Intranet Portal, Educational Data
Reporting Systems (including SchoolNet), experience with
Extract,Transform,Load (ETL) and Quality Assurance (QA) tasks
Training & Productivity Applications: Adobe Acrobat/InDesign, Camtasia, Elluminate
Data Management, Reporting & Analysis: MS-SQL Server, MS Access, SPSS,
Cognos, Microsoft Sharepoint Services
Web Coding & Scripting: ASP/ADO, XML/AJAX (jquery), Javascript, CSS, Visual
Basic for Applications
Infrastructure: MS Server 2008, Internet Information Server 6.0+, Active Directory

Education
1998 – 2000 Virginia Polytechnic Institute
M.A. Ed. Educational & Instructional Technology/Instructional System Design
   Lead Database Developer/Graduate Research Assistant – Center for Assessment,
   Evaluation and Educational Programming (CAEEP)
1996 – 2000 Virginia Polytechnic Institute
M.A. English Literature and Language
1991 – 1995 Virginia Polytechnic Institute
B.A. Liberal Arts: English/History
Professional Awards
Awarded 2007 – Virginia Educational Technology Leader of the Year, Region II

Professional Presentations
2007 - Educational Technology Leadership Conference
2007 - Virginia School Boards Association
2006 - Virginia Association of School Business Officials
2005 - Virginia Society for Technology Education
2004 - National Center for Educational Statistics Management Information Systems
Conference
184                 <-- Select Schools to Compare-->              167

       NORTHEAST HS                                                 MCCLURE ALEXANDER K
    Percent Adv/Prof                                                    Percent Adv/Prof
 Math            Reading                                             Math            Reading
 55.7%            57.3%                                              79.1%            60.9%


                Comparison of PSSA Percent Advanced/Proficient
                      NORTHEAST HS                        MCCLURE ALEXANDER K

100%
90%
                           79.1%
80%
70%
                                                                           60.9%
60%              55.7%                                           57.3%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
 0%
                       Math                                         Reading
196                   <-- Select Schools to Compare-->              167

 PAUL ROBESON HS FOR                                                MCCLURE ALEXANDER K
    Percent Adv/Prof                                                    Percent Adv/Prof
 Math            Reading                                             Math            Reading
 38.5%            48.5%                                              79.1%            60.9%


               Comparison of PSSA Percent Advanced/Proficient
                    PAUL ROBESON HS FOR                      MCCLURE ALEXANDER K

100%
90%
                            79.1%
80%
70%
                                                                           60.9%
60%
                                                                 48.5%
50%
                 38.5%
40%
30%
20%
10%
 0%
                       Math                                         Reading
7                   <-- Select Schools to Compare-->              167

  ALCORN JAMES SCH                                                  MCCLURE ALEXANDER K
    Percent Adv/Prof                                                    Percent Adv/Prof
 Math            Reading                                             Math            Reading
 22.1%            17.7%                                              79.1%            60.9%


               Comparison of PSSA Percent Advanced/Proficient
                     ALCORN JAMES SCH                       MCCLURE ALEXANDER K

100%
90%
                            79.1%
80%
70%
                                                                           60.9%
60%
50%
40%
30%              22.1%
20%
                                                                 17.7%
10%
 0%
                       Math                                         Reading
Select a school using the menu below
                                                                   Joseph W. Catharine School Preliminary AYP Performance

                                                                               Academic Performance                                             Participation*
                                                                   Reading                               Math                         Reading                    Math
                                                                   Increase/                            Increase/
                                                                   Decrease                             Decrease
                                                     % At/Above    from Last              % At/Above    from Last
                                                      Proficient      Year       Result    Proficient      Year      Result    % Tested      Result      % Tested       Result
                                       2011 Goals:                   72%                                  67%                          95%                       95%
    Students Overall                                   70.0         14.5          R         78.6          1.5         P           -             -           -             -

    White non-Hispanic                                                                                                            -             -           -             -

    Black/African American non-Hispanic                68.0         12.2          R         78.1          0.2         P           -             -           -             -

    Latino/Hispanic                                                                                                               -             -           -             -

    Asian/Pacific Islander                             85.7         28.0          P         92.9          8.3         P           -             -           -             -

    Multi-racial/ethnic                                                                                                           -             -           -             -

    IEP-Special Education                              31.0         15.6          R         44.8         29.4        R            -             -           -             -

    English Language Learners                                                                                                     -             -           -             -

    Economically Disadvantaged                         70.0         14.4          R         78.6          1.4         P           -             -           -             -

                                                                                                                                          *Participation not calculated at this time

    Note: Calculations do not take into account two-year averages, Growth Model                                     Legend
    or Confidence Intervals and other methods of target calculation used by PDE in
    determining a school's AYP Status
                                                                                                                      P       Group met measure

                                                                                                                      R       Group met target using Safe Harbor

                                                                                                                      O       Group did not meet measure
Select a school using the menu below
                                                                   Stephen Decatur School Preliminary AYP Performance

                                                                               Academic Performance                                             Participation*
                                                                   Reading                               Math                         Reading                    Math
                                                                   Increase/                            Increase/
                                                                   Decrease                             Decrease
                                                     % At/Above    from Last              % At/Above    from Last
                                                      Proficient      Year       Result    Proficient      Year      Result    % Tested      Result      % Tested       Result
                                       2011 Goals:                   72%                                  67%                          95%                       95%
    Students Overall                                   71.3         -0.8          O         82.5         -5.1         P           -             -           -             -

    White non-Hispanic                                 70.8         -0.5          O         84.7         -2.8         P           -             -           -             -

    Black/African American non-Hispanic                70.2          0.2          O         68.4         -11.6        O           -             -           -             -

    Latino/Hispanic                                    70.5          1.3          O         78.7         -12.1        P           -             -           -             -

    Asian/Pacific Islander                             71.1         -13.7         O         86.8         -10.2        P           -             -           -             -

    Multi-racial/ethnic                                                                                                           -             -           -             -

    IEP-Special Education                              29.8         -7.5          O         67.0         -9.4        O            -             -           -             -

    English Language Learners                          52.4         52.4          R         57.1         57.1        R            -             -           -             -

    Economically Disadvantaged                         67.3         -0.9          O         81.5         -2.6        P            -             -           -             -

                                                                                                                                          *Participation not calculated at this time

    Note: Calculations do not take into account two-year averages, Growth Model                                     Legend
    or Confidence Intervals and other methods of target calculation used by PDE in
    determining a school's AYP Status
                                                                                                                      P       Group met measure

                                                                                                                      R       Group met target using Safe Harbor

                                                                                                                      O       Group did not meet measure
Select a school using the menu below
                                                                   George W. Nebinger School Preliminary AYP Performance

                                                                               Academic Performance                                             Participation*
                                                                   Reading                               Math                         Reading                    Math
                                                                   Increase/                            Increase/
                                                                   Decrease                             Decrease
                                                     % At/Above    from Last              % At/Above    from Last
                                                      Proficient      Year       Result    Proficient      Year      Result    % Tested      Result      % Tested       Result
                                       2011 Goals:                   72%                                  67%                          95%                       95%
    Students Overall                                   72.7         14.9          P         82.0         13.9         P           -             -           -             -

    White non-Hispanic                                                                                                            -             -           -             -

    Black/African American non-Hispanic                69.7         10.7          R         80.9         15.9         P           -             -           -             -

    Latino/Hispanic                                    88.0         38.0          P         92.0         21.2         P           -             -           -             -

    Asian/Pacific Islander                                                                                                        -             -           -             -

    Multi-racial/ethnic                                                                                                           -             -           -             -

    IEP-Special Education                              66.7         38.6          R         83.3         17.7         P           -             -           -             -

    English Language Learners                                                                                                     -             -           -             -

    Economically Disadvantaged                         72.7         13.9          P         82.0         13.6         P           -             -           -             -

                                                                                                                                          *Participation not calculated at this time

    Note: Calculations do not take into account two-year averages, Growth Model                                     Legend
    or Confidence Intervals and other methods of target calculation used by PDE in
    determining a school's AYP Status
                                                                                                                      P       Group met measure

                                                                                                                      R       Group met target using Safe Harbor

                                                                                                                      O       Group did not meet measure
ONISS - Reporting on Delegations, Residency and Extenuating Circumstances Requests 10/2010 - 5/2011
    1       <--- Change Academic Division using the menu
                                                                                                                                                                Oct.2010 to
Academic                                            Delegations      EH36E     Residency     Cases Sent   Delegations       EH36E      Residency Cases Received May 2011
 Division              School Name                     Sent           Sent       Sent          Total       Received        Received    Received      Total      Total Cases
  AD 1                           Audenried Shs           0             5           1             6             1              0           0            1             7
  AD 1                      Carroll Charles Sch          0             2           3             5             0              1           0            1             6
  AD 1                  Douglas Stephen A Sch            0             8           0             8             0              3           0            3             11
  AD 1                 Edison Hs - Fareira Skills        7            24           3             34            2              7           3           12             46
  AD 1                          Fels Samuel Hs           6            36           11            53            8              4           18          30             83
  AD 1           Fitzsimons Thomas Academy               0             8           0             8             0              2           0            2             10
  AD 1                            Frankford Hs           2            53           2             57            3              6           4           13             70
  AD 1                    Franklin Benjamin Hs           2            15           1             18            1              4           0            5             23
  AD 1                      Furness Horace Hs            1             2           0             3             0              1           0            1             4
  AD 1                  George Washington Hs             2             4           1             7             1              4           2            7             14
  AD 1                        Germantown Hs              3            18           1             22            2              3           0            5             27
  AD 1                         Gratz Simon Hs            2            22           0             24            2              3           2            7             31
  AD 1                        John Bartram Hs            0             8           0             8             2              2           0            4             12
                                     Total Cases        66            370          94           524           53              99          86          222           740


               Cases by Type                          Ranked Schools Sending 4 or More Students              Ranked Schools Receiving 4 or More Students
                15%
                                                                           Frankford Hs         57                             Fels Samuel Hs         30
         23%                                                        Lincoln Abraham Hs          54                       Lincoln Abraham Hs           24
                                  Delegation
                                  EH36E                                  Fels Samuel Hs         53                              Overbrook Hs          17
                                  Residency                     Edison Hs - Fareira Skills      34                        Olney Hs West-704           15
               63%                                                        Overbrook Hs          33                               Frankford Hs         13
                                                                Strawberry Mansion Hs           31                     King Martin Luther Hs          13
        Delegation    EH36E     Residency                            Sayre William L Ms         29                   Edison Hs - Fareira Skills       12
                                                                     Olney Hs West-704          28                        Sayre William L Ms          10
 400                                                              King Martin Luther Hs         26           Kensington Intl Business Finance          9
 300                                                                     Gratz Simon Hs         24                    George Washington Hs             7
 200                                                                    Germantown Hs           22                   Strawberry Mansion Hs             7
                                                                      Olney Hs East-705         21                            Gratz Simon Hs           7
 100
                                                                  Rhodes E W Academy            18                     Lamberton Robert Hs             6
   0                                                               Franklin Benjamin Hs         18                           Germantown Hs             5
               Sent           Received
                                                             Total Schools on Sending List      23                 Total Schools on Receiving List    19
ONISS - Reporting on Delegations, Residency and Extenuating Circumstances Requests 10/2010 - 5/2011
    1         <--- Change Academic Division using the menu
                                                                                                                                                                    Oct.2010 to
Academic                                                Delegations      EH36E     Residency     Cases Sent   Delegations       EH36E      Residency Cases Received May 2011
 Division                   School Name                    Sent           Sent       Sent          Total       Received        Received    Received      Total      Total Cases
  AD 6                             Allen Ethan Sch           1            15           4             20            2              1            5           8             28
  AD 6                        Brown Joseph H Sch             0             3           0             3             0              1            2           3             6
  AD 6                         Carnell Laura H Sch           2            16           10            28            1              2            7          10             38
  AD 6                          Comly Watson Sch             0             0           1             1             0              0            1           1             2
  AD 6                      Creighton Thomas Sch             0             9           0             9             0              3            1           4             13
  AD 6                       Disston Hamilton Sch            1             9           16            26            0              3            10         13             39
  AD 6                      Edmunds Henry R Sch              2            16           15            33            2              5            0           8             41
  AD 6                         Fitzpatrick Aloysius          3             2           0             5             1              0            0           1             6
  AD 6                           Forrest Edwin Sch           0             4           3             7             0              1            2           3             10
  AD 6                             Frank Anne Sch            5             6           1             12            1              0            0           1             13
  AD 6                          Franklin Benjamin            0             4           3             7             0              4            3           7             14
  AD 6                      Greenberg Joseph Sch             0             1           7             8             0              3            2           5             13
  AD 6                           Hancock John Sch            0             0           1             1             0              3            0           3             4
                                          Total Cases       28            161         187           368           23              78          100         186           548


                Cases by Type                             Ranked Schools Sending 4 or More Students              Ranked Schools Receiving 4 or More Students
                 7%                                                   Juniata Park Academy          37                        Ziegler William H Sch       31
                                     Delegation                       Edmunds Henry R Sch           33                        Spruance Gilbert Sch        14
        51%           42%            EH36E                              Sheridan Philip H Sc        31                        Disston Hamilton Sch        13
                                     Residency                           Carnell Laura H Sch        28                         Sheridan Philip H Sc       12
                                                                       Disston Hamilton Sch         26                         Webster John H Sch         11
                                                                                 Mayfair Sch        22                          Carnell Laura H Sch       10
        Delegation      EH36E      Residency                           Spruance Gilbert Sch         22                        Lawton Henry W Sch           9
                                                                             Allen Ethan Sch        20                              Allen Ethan Sch        8
 200                                                                   Lawton Henry W Sch           12                       Edmunds Henry R Sch           8
 150                                                                         Frank Anne Sch         12                       Juniata Park Academy          8
 100                                                                    Sullivan James J Sch        12                           Franklin Benjamin         7
                                                                        Webster John H Sch          12                             Rhawnhurst Sch          6
  50
                                                                       Ziegler William H Sch        10                       Greenberg Joseph Sch          5
   0                                                                  Hopkinson Francis Sch         10                       Creighton Thomas Sch          4
                Sent             Received
                                                                 Total Schools on Sending List      24                 Total Schools on Receiving List    14
Percent of Points Correct on 2011 PSSA*                                                                                          Math Percent of Points Correct on 2011 PSSA
School                                                                    <<< Select your School Here                                      65% Cut Point     11th Math           8th Math           7th Math
                                                                                                                                           6th Math          5th Math            4th Math           3rd Math
             chart too cluttered? use checkboxes to hide data from the chart                                                                                              A.1
 Math          hide data       hide data      hide data      hide data         hide data   hide data   hide data                                       E.4
                                                                                                                                                                        25%
                                                                                                                                                                                            A.2
   Grade           3              4              5               6               7            8          11
                                                                                                                                                                        35%
     A.1         80%            62%             69%            64%              69%         86%           -
     A.2         85%            45%             68%            55%              73%         55%           -                               E.3                                                           A.3
                                                                                                                                                                        45%
     A.3         86%            58%             62%            47%              49%         64%           -
     B.1         72%            55%             43%            35%              40%         73%           -
                                                                                                                                                                        55%
     B.2         81%            59%             50%            71%              47%         65%           -
     B.3           -              -               -              -                -           -           -                   E.2                                       65%
                                                                                                                                                                                                                     B.1
     C.1         89%            51%             54%            67%              63%         72%           -
     C.2         84%            59%             56%              -                -           -           -                                                             75%
     C.3           -            60%               -            83%              76%         75%           -
     D.1         93%            58%             54%            79%              42%         69%           -                                                             85%
     D.2         70%            59%             63%            66%              55%         76%           -             E.1                                                                                                B.2
     D.3           -              -               -              -              66%           -           -                                                             95%
     D.4           -              -               -              -                -         85%           -
     E.1         91%            56%             54%            57%              63%         68%           -
     E.2           -              -             79%            53%              74%           -           -
     E.3           -            65%             73%            66%              66%         64%           -              D.4                                                                                           B.3
     E.4           -              -               -              -              63%         79%           -
  Students        49             51              53             52               45          50           -

 Reading
   Grade           3              4              5               6               7            8          11                         D.3                                                                        C.1
     A.1         73%            61%             59%            63%              65%         69%           -
     A.2         72%            65%             63%            63%              62%         75%           -
     A.3           -              -               -              -                -           -           -
     B.1         72%            65%             64%            64%              57%         61%           -                                     D.2                                               C.2
     B.2           -            61%             63%            74%              59%         55%           -
     B.3         78%            70%             68%            61%              44%         70%           -                                                  D.1                  C.3
  Students        49             51              53             52               45          50           -
                                                                                                                   Chart too cluttered? Use the 'hide data' checkboxes to remove data.                          Reading data not shown


             *Note: PSSA-M and PASA scores not included in the data
Percent of Points Correct on 2011 PSSA*                                                                                          Math Percent of Points Correct on 2011 PSSA
School                                                                    <<< Select your School Here                                      65% Cut Point     11th Math           8th Math           7th Math
                                                                                                                                           6th Math          5th Math            4th Math           3rd Math
             chart too cluttered? use checkboxes to hide data from the chart                                                                                              A.1
 Math          hide data       hide data      hide data      hide data         hide data   hide data   hide data                                       E.4
                                                                                                                                                                        25%
                                                                                                                                                                                            A.2
   Grade           3              4              5               6               7            8          11
                                                                                                                                                                        35%
     A.1         80%            62%             69%            64%              69%         86%           -
     A.2         85%            45%             68%            55%              73%         55%           -                               E.3                                                           A.3
                                                                                                                                                                        45%
     A.3         86%            58%             62%            47%              49%         64%           -
     B.1         72%            55%             43%            35%              40%         73%           -
                                                                                                                                                                        55%
     B.2         81%            59%             50%            71%              47%         65%           -
     B.3           -              -               -              -                -           -           -                   E.2                                       65%
                                                                                                                                                                                                                     B.1
     C.1         89%            51%             54%            67%              63%         72%           -
     C.2         84%            59%             56%              -                -           -           -                                                             75%
     C.3           -            60%               -            83%              76%         75%           -
     D.1         93%            58%             54%            79%              42%         69%           -                                                             85%
     D.2         70%            59%             63%            66%              55%         76%           -             E.1                                                                                                B.2
     D.3           -              -               -              -              66%           -           -                                                             95%
     D.4           -              -               -              -                -         85%           -
     E.1         91%            56%             54%            57%              63%         68%           -
     E.2           -              -             79%            53%              74%           -           -
     E.3           -            65%             73%            66%              66%         64%           -              D.4                                                                                           B.3
     E.4           -              -               -              -              63%         79%           -
  Students        49             51              53             52               45          50           -

 Reading
   Grade           3              4              5               6               7            8          11                         D.3                                                                        C.1
     A.1         73%            61%             59%            63%              65%         69%           -
     A.2         72%            65%             63%            63%              62%         75%           -
     A.3           -              -               -              -                -           -           -
     B.1         72%            65%             64%            64%              57%         61%           -                                     D.2                                               C.2
     B.2           -            61%             63%            74%              59%         55%           -
     B.3         78%            70%             68%            61%              44%         70%           -                                                  D.1                  C.3
  Students        49             51              53             52               45          50           -
                                                                                                                   Chart too cluttered? Use the 'hide data' checkboxes to remove data.                          Reading data not shown


             *Note: PSSA-M and PASA scores not included in the data
Percent of Points Correct on 2011 PSSA*                                                                                          Math Percent of Points Correct on 2011 PSSA
School                                                                    <<< Select your School Here                                      65% Cut Point     11th Math           8th Math           7th Math
                                                                                                                                           6th Math          5th Math            4th Math           3rd Math
             chart too cluttered? use checkboxes to hide data from the chart                                                                                              A.1
 Math          hide data       hide data      hide data      hide data         hide data   hide data   hide data                                       E.4
                                                                                                                                                                        25%
                                                                                                                                                                                            A.2
   Grade           3              4              5               6               7            8          11
                                                                                                                                                                        35%
     A.1         80%            62%             69%            64%              69%         86%           -
     A.2         85%            45%             68%            55%              73%         55%           -                               E.3                                                           A.3
                                                                                                                                                                        45%
     A.3         86%            58%             62%            47%              49%         64%           -
     B.1         72%            55%             43%            35%              40%         73%           -
                                                                                                                                                                        55%
     B.2         81%            59%             50%            71%              47%         65%           -
     B.3           -              -               -              -                -           -           -                   E.2                                       65%
                                                                                                                                                                                                                     B.1
     C.1         89%            51%             54%            67%              63%         72%           -
     C.2         84%            59%             56%              -                -           -           -                                                             75%
     C.3           -            60%               -            83%              76%         75%           -
     D.1         93%            58%             54%            79%              42%         69%           -                                                             85%
     D.2         70%            59%             63%            66%              55%         76%           -             E.1                                                                                                B.2
     D.3           -              -               -              -              66%           -           -                                                             95%
     D.4           -              -               -              -                -         85%           -
     E.1         91%            56%             54%            57%              63%         68%           -
     E.2           -              -             79%            53%              74%           -           -
     E.3           -            65%             73%            66%              66%         64%           -              D.4                                                                                           B.3
     E.4           -              -               -              -              63%         79%           -
  Students        49             51              53             52               45          50           -

 Reading
   Grade           3              4              5               6               7            8          11                         D.3                                                                        C.1
     A.1         73%            61%             59%            63%              65%         69%           -
     A.2         72%            65%             63%            63%              62%         75%           -
     A.3           -              -               -              -                -           -           -
     B.1         72%            65%             64%            64%              57%         61%           -                                     D.2                                               C.2
     B.2           -            61%             63%            74%              59%         55%           -
     B.3         78%            70%             68%            61%              44%         70%           -                                                  D.1                  C.3
  Students        49             51              53             52               45          50           -
                                                                                                                   Chart too cluttered? Use the 'hide data' checkboxes to remove data.                          Reading data not shown


             *Note: PSSA-M and PASA scores not included in the data
Percent of Points Correct on 2011 PSSA*                                                                                          Math Percent of Points Correct on 2011 PSSA
School                                                                    <<< Select your School Here                                      65% Cut Point     11th Math           8th Math           7th Math
                                                                                                                                           6th Math          5th Math            4th Math           3rd Math
             chart too cluttered? use checkboxes to hide data from the chart                                                                                              A.1
 Math          hide data       hide data      hide data      hide data         hide data   hide data   hide data                                       E.4
                                                                                                                                                                        25%
                                                                                                                                                                                            A.2
   Grade           3              4              5               6               7            8          11
                                                                                                                                                                        35%
     A.1         80%            62%             69%            64%              69%         86%           -
     A.2         85%            45%             68%            55%              73%         55%           -                               E.3                                                           A.3
                                                                                                                                                                        45%
     A.3         86%            58%             62%            47%              49%         64%           -
     B.1         72%            55%             43%            35%              40%         73%           -
                                                                                                                                                                        55%
     B.2         81%            59%             50%            71%              47%         65%           -
     B.3           -              -               -              -                -           -           -                   E.2                                       65%
                                                                                                                                                                                                                     B.1
     C.1         89%            51%             54%            67%              63%         72%           -
     C.2         84%            59%             56%              -                -           -           -                                                             75%
     C.3           -            60%               -            83%              76%         75%           -
     D.1         93%            58%             54%            79%              42%         69%           -                                                             85%
     D.2         70%            59%             63%            66%              55%         76%           -             E.1                                                                                                B.2
     D.3           -              -               -              -              66%           -           -                                                             95%
     D.4           -              -               -              -                -         85%           -
     E.1         91%            56%             54%            57%              63%         68%           -
     E.2           -              -             79%            53%              74%           -           -
     E.3           -            65%             73%            66%              66%         64%           -              D.4                                                                                           B.3
     E.4           -              -               -              -              63%         79%           -
  Students        49             51              53             52               45          50           -

 Reading
   Grade           3              4              5               6               7            8          11                         D.3                                                                        C.1
     A.1         73%            61%             59%            63%              65%         69%           -
     A.2         72%            65%             63%            63%              62%         75%           -
     A.3           -              -               -              -                -           -           -
     B.1         72%            65%             64%            64%              57%         61%           -                                     D.2                                               C.2
     B.2           -            61%             63%            74%              59%         55%           -
     B.3         78%            70%             68%            61%              44%         70%           -                                                  D.1                  C.3
  Students        49             51              53             52               45          50           -
                                                                                                                   Chart too cluttered? Use the 'hide data' checkboxes to remove data.                          Reading data not shown


             *Note: PSSA-M and PASA scores not included in the data
OSCAR Student Answer Sheet                                       Building: 1892
               Test Geometry Quarterly Assessment #1
            Student E____ B____                         User ID 116975
           Instructor Jurisson Pd.5/6                  Passcode 38




1                  26                     51                     76
2                  27                     52                     77
3                  28                     53                     78
4                  29                     54                     79
5                  30                     55                     80
6                  31                     56                     81
7                  32                     57                     82
8                  33                     58                     83
9                  34                     59                     84
10                 35                     60                     85
11                 36                     61                     86
12                 37                     62                     87
13                 38                     63                     88
14                 39                     64                     89
15                 40                     65                     90
16                 41                     66                     91
17                 42                     67                     92
18                 43                     68                     93
19                 44                     69                     94
20                 45                     70                     95
21                 46                     71                     96
22                 47                     72                     97
23                 48                     73                     98
24                 49                     74                     99
25                 50                     75                    100
OSCAR | School Performance Report                                                                                          Page 1 of 1



                                                         Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2

                                                                      Average Score:67%
                                                                        Pass Rate:47%
                                                         (Passing 97 / Tested 205) Cut Score: 70% or better

                                                               Test                  Instructor Bell Pass% Passing Total
                                                  Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2    Jurisson   5/6   56     9     16
                                                  Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2    Keaton     1/2   25     4     16
                                                  Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2    Keaton     3/4   25     4     16
                                                  Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2     Kileen    2     71    15     21
                                                  Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2     Kileen    4/5   43     7     16
                                                  Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2    Lorgen     2/3   18     4     22
                                                  Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2    Lorgen     7/8   42     9     21
                                                  Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2     Suggs     1     71    10     14
                                                  Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2     Suggs     4     70    12     17
                                                  Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2     Suggs     6/7   60    12     20
                                                  Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2    Volante    1     50     8     16
                                                  Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2    Volante    4     30     3     10




http://www.pasip.org/oscar/testanalyzer_solsummary_scoping_MLPie_DirectWrite.asp?TI...                                       5/5/2009

More Related Content

Viewers also liked (10)

Три инструмента положительной мотивации команды
Три инструмента положительной мотивации командыТри инструмента положительной мотивации команды
Три инструмента положительной мотивации команды
 
EQUIPO MAYAS 2
EQUIPO MAYAS 2EQUIPO MAYAS 2
EQUIPO MAYAS 2
 
EQUIPO AZTECAS 6
EQUIPO AZTECAS 6EQUIPO AZTECAS 6
EQUIPO AZTECAS 6
 
EQUIPO AZTECAS 2
EQUIPO AZTECAS 2EQUIPO AZTECAS 2
EQUIPO AZTECAS 2
 
EQUIPO MAYAS 5
EQUIPO MAYAS 5EQUIPO MAYAS 5
EQUIPO MAYAS 5
 
EQUIPO MAYAS 1
EQUIPO MAYAS 1EQUIPO MAYAS 1
EQUIPO MAYAS 1
 
EQUIPO AZTECAS 8
EQUIPO AZTECAS 8EQUIPO AZTECAS 8
EQUIPO AZTECAS 8
 
EQUIPO AZTECAS 5
EQUIPO AZTECAS 5EQUIPO AZTECAS 5
EQUIPO AZTECAS 5
 
Winners' Podium--everyone fits on it
Winners' Podium--everyone fits on itWinners' Podium--everyone fits on it
Winners' Podium--everyone fits on it
 
Философия Agile 1.0
Философия Agile 1.0Философия Agile 1.0
Философия Agile 1.0
 

Similar to Educ data specialist work samples

PA Performance Profile Information
PA Performance Profile InformationPA Performance Profile Information
PA Performance Profile InformationEric Lech
 
PRINCIPAL RESUME R3-2
PRINCIPAL RESUME R3-2PRINCIPAL RESUME R3-2
PRINCIPAL RESUME R3-2Kyle Miller
 
Mi Sas 20090326 1402 Wc Ms Principals
Mi Sas 20090326 1402 Wc Ms PrincipalsMi Sas 20090326 1402 Wc Ms Principals
Mi Sas 20090326 1402 Wc Ms PrincipalsBruce Fay
 
South Central Pennsylvania school performance profiles 2012 13
South Central Pennsylvania school performance profiles 2012 13South Central Pennsylvania school performance profiles 2012 13
South Central Pennsylvania school performance profiles 2012 13James Baker, SPHR Retired, MAS
 
Educators Pave the Way for Next Generation of Learners
Educators Pave the Way for Next Generation of LearnersEducators Pave the Way for Next Generation of Learners
Educators Pave the Way for Next Generation of LearnersCognizant
 
Catalog2015-CASAS-web-fillable
Catalog2015-CASAS-web-fillableCatalog2015-CASAS-web-fillable
Catalog2015-CASAS-web-fillableBerenice Weber
 
SmarterMeasure Best Practices and Case Studies Webinar 4 2013
SmarterMeasure Best Practices and Case Studies Webinar 4 2013SmarterMeasure Best Practices and Case Studies Webinar 4 2013
SmarterMeasure Best Practices and Case Studies Webinar 4 2013SmarterServices Owen
 
Online testing in Maths
Online testing in MathsOnline testing in Maths
Online testing in Mathsmdfaithfull
 
De Assessment Brochure
De Assessment BrochureDe Assessment Brochure
De Assessment BrochureEvan Fan
 
More with Less: Five Strategies for Facilities Success [MAPPA-CAPPA 2017]
More with Less: Five Strategies for Facilities Success [MAPPA-CAPPA 2017]More with Less: Five Strategies for Facilities Success [MAPPA-CAPPA 2017]
More with Less: Five Strategies for Facilities Success [MAPPA-CAPPA 2017]Sightlines
 
Symposium 2014 - Data Management: The Complete Student Experience
Symposium 2014 - Data Management: The Complete Student ExperienceSymposium 2014 - Data Management: The Complete Student Experience
Symposium 2014 - Data Management: The Complete Student ExperienceLauren DeSoiza
 
Expanded budget requests
Expanded budget requestsExpanded budget requests
Expanded budget requestsEducationNC
 
Scalable Authentic Assessment in the Information Age
Scalable Authentic Assessment in the Information AgeScalable Authentic Assessment in the Information Age
Scalable Authentic Assessment in the Information AgeAmazon Web Services
 
HRD-845 Project -- MAP-PACT-PASS
HRD-845 Project -- MAP-PACT-PASSHRD-845 Project -- MAP-PACT-PASS
HRD-845 Project -- MAP-PACT-PASStberkli
 
Brandon_McCarn_Senior_Resume
Brandon_McCarn_Senior_ResumeBrandon_McCarn_Senior_Resume
Brandon_McCarn_Senior_ResumeBrandon McCarn
 
Using Analytics to Intervene with Underperforming College Students
Using Analytics to Intervene with Underperforming College StudentsUsing Analytics to Intervene with Underperforming College Students
Using Analytics to Intervene with Underperforming College Studentsekunnen
 

Similar to Educ data specialist work samples (20)

PA Performance Profile Information
PA Performance Profile InformationPA Performance Profile Information
PA Performance Profile Information
 
Student Performance Data Mining Project Report
Student Performance Data Mining Project ReportStudent Performance Data Mining Project Report
Student Performance Data Mining Project Report
 
PRINCIPAL RESUME R3-2
PRINCIPAL RESUME R3-2PRINCIPAL RESUME R3-2
PRINCIPAL RESUME R3-2
 
Mi Sas 20090326 1402 Wc Ms Principals
Mi Sas 20090326 1402 Wc Ms PrincipalsMi Sas 20090326 1402 Wc Ms Principals
Mi Sas 20090326 1402 Wc Ms Principals
 
South Central Pennsylvania school performance profiles 2012 13
South Central Pennsylvania school performance profiles 2012 13South Central Pennsylvania school performance profiles 2012 13
South Central Pennsylvania school performance profiles 2012 13
 
Educators Pave the Way for Next Generation of Learners
Educators Pave the Way for Next Generation of LearnersEducators Pave the Way for Next Generation of Learners
Educators Pave the Way for Next Generation of Learners
 
Catalog2015-CASAS-web-fillable
Catalog2015-CASAS-web-fillableCatalog2015-CASAS-web-fillable
Catalog2015-CASAS-web-fillable
 
SmarterMeasure Best Practices and Case Studies Webinar 4 2013
SmarterMeasure Best Practices and Case Studies Webinar 4 2013SmarterMeasure Best Practices and Case Studies Webinar 4 2013
SmarterMeasure Best Practices and Case Studies Webinar 4 2013
 
Online testing in Maths
Online testing in MathsOnline testing in Maths
Online testing in Maths
 
De Assessment Brochure
De Assessment BrochureDe Assessment Brochure
De Assessment Brochure
 
More with Less: Five Strategies for Facilities Success [MAPPA-CAPPA 2017]
More with Less: Five Strategies for Facilities Success [MAPPA-CAPPA 2017]More with Less: Five Strategies for Facilities Success [MAPPA-CAPPA 2017]
More with Less: Five Strategies for Facilities Success [MAPPA-CAPPA 2017]
 
Board exam predictor
Board exam predictorBoard exam predictor
Board exam predictor
 
Symposium 2014 - Data Management: The Complete Student Experience
Symposium 2014 - Data Management: The Complete Student ExperienceSymposium 2014 - Data Management: The Complete Student Experience
Symposium 2014 - Data Management: The Complete Student Experience
 
Expanded budget requests
Expanded budget requestsExpanded budget requests
Expanded budget requests
 
Scalable Authentic Assessment in the Information Age
Scalable Authentic Assessment in the Information AgeScalable Authentic Assessment in the Information Age
Scalable Authentic Assessment in the Information Age
 
HRD-845 Project -- MAP-PACT-PASS
HRD-845 Project -- MAP-PACT-PASSHRD-845 Project -- MAP-PACT-PASS
HRD-845 Project -- MAP-PACT-PASS
 
Brandon_McCarn_Senior_Resume
Brandon_McCarn_Senior_ResumeBrandon_McCarn_Senior_Resume
Brandon_McCarn_Senior_Resume
 
No Worker Left Behind
No Worker Left BehindNo Worker Left Behind
No Worker Left Behind
 
Nicole cox resume
Nicole cox resumeNicole cox resume
Nicole cox resume
 
Using Analytics to Intervene with Underperforming College Students
Using Analytics to Intervene with Underperforming College StudentsUsing Analytics to Intervene with Underperforming College Students
Using Analytics to Intervene with Underperforming College Students
 

Recently uploaded

Install Stable Diffusion in windows machine
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machineInstall Stable Diffusion in windows machine
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machinePadma Pradeep
 
SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024
SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024
SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024Scott Keck-Warren
 
CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):
CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):
CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):comworks
 
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024Scott Keck-Warren
 
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project Setup
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project SetupStreamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project Setup
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project SetupFlorian Wilhelm
 
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...shyamraj55
 
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsHuman Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsMark Billinghurst
 
Understanding the Laravel MVC Architecture
Understanding the Laravel MVC ArchitectureUnderstanding the Laravel MVC Architecture
Understanding the Laravel MVC ArchitecturePixlogix Infotech
 
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen Frames
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen FramesUnblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen Frames
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen FramesSinan KOZAK
 
APIForce Zurich 5 April Automation LPDG
APIForce Zurich 5 April  Automation LPDGAPIForce Zurich 5 April  Automation LPDG
APIForce Zurich 5 April Automation LPDGMarianaLemus7
 
Enhancing Worker Digital Experience: A Hands-on Workshop for Partners
Enhancing Worker Digital Experience: A Hands-on Workshop for PartnersEnhancing Worker Digital Experience: A Hands-on Workshop for Partners
Enhancing Worker Digital Experience: A Hands-on Workshop for PartnersThousandEyes
 
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL CertsScanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL CertsRizwan Syed
 
costume and set research powerpoint presentation
costume and set research powerpoint presentationcostume and set research powerpoint presentation
costume and set research powerpoint presentationphoebematthew05
 
AI as an Interface for Commercial Buildings
AI as an Interface for Commercial BuildingsAI as an Interface for Commercial Buildings
AI as an Interface for Commercial BuildingsMemoori
 
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubUnleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubKalema Edgar
 
SIEMENS: RAPUNZEL – A Tale About Knowledge Graph
SIEMENS: RAPUNZEL – A Tale About Knowledge GraphSIEMENS: RAPUNZEL – A Tale About Knowledge Graph
SIEMENS: RAPUNZEL – A Tale About Knowledge GraphNeo4j
 
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 3652toLead Limited
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Install Stable Diffusion in windows machine
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machineInstall Stable Diffusion in windows machine
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machine
 
SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024
SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024
SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024
 
E-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptx
E-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptxE-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptx
E-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptx
 
CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):
CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):
CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):
 
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024
 
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project Setup
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project SetupStreamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project Setup
Streamlining Python Development: A Guide to a Modern Project Setup
 
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...
 
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsHuman Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
 
Understanding the Laravel MVC Architecture
Understanding the Laravel MVC ArchitectureUnderstanding the Laravel MVC Architecture
Understanding the Laravel MVC Architecture
 
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen Frames
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen FramesUnblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen Frames
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen Frames
 
APIForce Zurich 5 April Automation LPDG
APIForce Zurich 5 April  Automation LPDGAPIForce Zurich 5 April  Automation LPDG
APIForce Zurich 5 April Automation LPDG
 
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special EditionDMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
 
Enhancing Worker Digital Experience: A Hands-on Workshop for Partners
Enhancing Worker Digital Experience: A Hands-on Workshop for PartnersEnhancing Worker Digital Experience: A Hands-on Workshop for Partners
Enhancing Worker Digital Experience: A Hands-on Workshop for Partners
 
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL CertsScanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
 
costume and set research powerpoint presentation
costume and set research powerpoint presentationcostume and set research powerpoint presentation
costume and set research powerpoint presentation
 
AI as an Interface for Commercial Buildings
AI as an Interface for Commercial BuildingsAI as an Interface for Commercial Buildings
AI as an Interface for Commercial Buildings
 
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024
 
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubUnleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
 
SIEMENS: RAPUNZEL – A Tale About Knowledge Graph
SIEMENS: RAPUNZEL – A Tale About Knowledge GraphSIEMENS: RAPUNZEL – A Tale About Knowledge Graph
SIEMENS: RAPUNZEL – A Tale About Knowledge Graph
 
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
 

Educ data specialist work samples

  • 1. Chris Baugh chrisbaugh19@gmail.com ~ 757.715.0919 mobile ~ 215.923.4961 home ~ Philadelphia, PA Objective Bring a pragmatic and enthusiastic approach to the development, management and analysis of educational data. Professional Experience 2010 – Current School District of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA Development Coordinator - Office of Accountability, Assessment & Performance Targets Responsibilities & Essential Functions · Maintain and monitor assessment programs, ensuring data quality in coordination with the Offices of Educational Technology and Information Technology and outside vendors and agencies, including counterparts in the Pennsylvania Department of Education, SchoolNet, CTB/McGraw-Hill and the Data Recognition Corporation, publishers of the Pennsylvania System of School Assessment (PSSA). · Author reports on assessment performance, student achievement and other core accountability indicators, including analysis of Pennsylvania System of School Assessment (PSSA) and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for several audiences, such as central offices, schools, regions, state and local governments, media and general public. · Develop and maintain accountability and assessment technologies for use in data reporting, data processing, and data utilization; MS-SQL, Access, Excel, SPSS. · Provide staff leadership, professional development and expertise in support of district projects between multiple district offices as well as with outside agencies. Key Accomplishments · Developed PSSA Data Visualization system to improve accuracy of PSSA data reporting and enrich the analysis of multiple datasets by leveraging lightweight, industry- standard information technologies for use in the educational management environment. · Principle architect and project manager for the COMPSTAT reporting system, which allowed the Office of School Safety (OSS) to improve the accuracy of key school climate indices; reduced the amount of time spent on-task by OSS staff tasked with producing routine executive-level reports from several days to a matter of minutes. · Worked in partnership with the Superintendent's office and City of Philadelphia technical offices to develop the analytic systems used to identify schools for conversion to the Renaissance turn-around model using state, local and city datasets; the resulting report was presented to C-level staff for finalization and adoption. · Lead author and principle investigator for the district's response to allegations of testing irregularities that took place in the administration of the 2009 PSSA test; developed an analytical model that further refined existing data analysis from the testing vendor and produced actionable findings for future investigations into testing irregularity.
  • 2. 2008 – 2009 PA Dept. of Education/Delaware County Intermediate Unit, PA Educational Technology Coordinator, School Improvement Project Responsibilities & Essential Functions · Coordinate with School Improvement team to support technical efforts on the grant- funded Pennsylvania Department of Education (PDE) contract; to include developing data analysis resources and delivery of key data reports to multiple stakeholders. · Coordinate data sharing projects with PDE Bureau of Accountability and Assessment and PDE contractors, to include IU13-PVAAS team and SAS Business Analytics. · Design and maintain assessment reporting systems on NCLB data metrics; Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), Pennsylvania System of School Assessment (PSSA), Pennsylvania Value-Added Assessment System (PVAAS). Key Accomplishments · Served as the technical representative on several state-level committees related to Accountability, Assessment, and Data Reporting. · Authored professional development and online training supports for the 1000+ school- teams using the Getting Results school improvement model; to include several on- demand training videos, dynamic data tools, and structured organization of communication & training materials. 2007 – 2008 Suffolk Public Schools, Suffolk, VA Supervisor of Technology, Information Services & Systems 2000 - 2007 Suffolk Public Schools, Suffolk, VA Technology Integrator, Information Services & Systems Responsibilities & Essential Functions · Coordinate with departmental administrators to meet information services and support needs for 21 schools and 3 district offices; to include daily information services operations, student information systems, educational research, and strategic planning. · Administer accountability systems for local, state and federal reporting. · Develop and manage technical aspects of the local assessment systems, to include instrument development, assessment delivery, and performance reporting systems. · Supervise the Information Services technical team within the district Technology Center; responsible for coordinating tier 1 to 3 support and training for multiple systems involving 700+ staff and 15,000+ students. · Coordinate with administration in the design, analysis and delivery of student performance data to multiple stakeholders; to include executive summaries and the public. · Participate in strategic planning; projects include division-wide online assessment for NCLB accountability, reporting systems for data-driven decision making, payroll and human resources application automation, web-based teacher gradebooks, online student transcripts/course requests.
  • 3. · Manage technology integration projects between district and vendors while reporting progress directly to Director of Technology and district executive team. Key Accomplishments · Created an online state-standards assessment system that encompassed measuring student achievement in real-time and reporting performance data for parents, teachers, principals and central office staff for the purpose of targeted remediation, instructional and curricular adjustment. The SOLO system (Standards Of Learning Online) reduced the district's assessment cycles from 1 semester to 1 week while improving the overall quality of the data and instructional decision-making. · Created a data warehouse that integrated district data from multiple sources into a single reporting suite. The result of blending student performance data and demographic data within the larger context of our organizational data systems (NCLB- funded programs, special education, transportation, guidance & safety office) gave administrators access to reporting that supported their decision-making and could be incorporated into single-year and multi-year studies. · Personally developed, implemented, trained and supported several core organizational intranet applications to replace time-consuming manual procedures. Noticeable gains in data accuracy were made with shorter processing time and improved accountability. Technical Skills Enterprise-Level Information Systems: Student Information Systems (including eSchoolPlus, Pentamation, SASI, ACHIEVE), Online Gradebook-Report Card (including GradeSpeed), Employee Services Intranet Portal, Educational Data Reporting Systems (including SchoolNet), experience with Extract,Transform,Load (ETL) and Quality Assurance (QA) tasks Training & Productivity Applications: Adobe Acrobat/InDesign, Camtasia, Elluminate Data Management, Reporting & Analysis: MS-SQL Server, MS Access, SPSS, Cognos, Microsoft Sharepoint Services Web Coding & Scripting: ASP/ADO, XML/AJAX (jquery), Javascript, CSS, Visual Basic for Applications Infrastructure: MS Server 2008, Internet Information Server 6.0+, Active Directory Education 1998 – 2000 Virginia Polytechnic Institute M.A. Ed. Educational & Instructional Technology/Instructional System Design Lead Database Developer/Graduate Research Assistant – Center for Assessment, Evaluation and Educational Programming (CAEEP) 1996 – 2000 Virginia Polytechnic Institute M.A. English Literature and Language 1991 – 1995 Virginia Polytechnic Institute B.A. Liberal Arts: English/History
  • 4. Professional Awards Awarded 2007 – Virginia Educational Technology Leader of the Year, Region II Professional Presentations 2007 - Educational Technology Leadership Conference 2007 - Virginia School Boards Association 2006 - Virginia Association of School Business Officials 2005 - Virginia Society for Technology Education 2004 - National Center for Educational Statistics Management Information Systems Conference
  • 5. 184 <-- Select Schools to Compare--> 167 NORTHEAST HS MCCLURE ALEXANDER K Percent Adv/Prof Percent Adv/Prof Math Reading Math Reading 55.7% 57.3% 79.1% 60.9% Comparison of PSSA Percent Advanced/Proficient NORTHEAST HS MCCLURE ALEXANDER K 100% 90% 79.1% 80% 70% 60.9% 60% 55.7% 57.3% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Math Reading
  • 6. 196 <-- Select Schools to Compare--> 167 PAUL ROBESON HS FOR MCCLURE ALEXANDER K Percent Adv/Prof Percent Adv/Prof Math Reading Math Reading 38.5% 48.5% 79.1% 60.9% Comparison of PSSA Percent Advanced/Proficient PAUL ROBESON HS FOR MCCLURE ALEXANDER K 100% 90% 79.1% 80% 70% 60.9% 60% 48.5% 50% 38.5% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Math Reading
  • 7. 7 <-- Select Schools to Compare--> 167 ALCORN JAMES SCH MCCLURE ALEXANDER K Percent Adv/Prof Percent Adv/Prof Math Reading Math Reading 22.1% 17.7% 79.1% 60.9% Comparison of PSSA Percent Advanced/Proficient ALCORN JAMES SCH MCCLURE ALEXANDER K 100% 90% 79.1% 80% 70% 60.9% 60% 50% 40% 30% 22.1% 20% 17.7% 10% 0% Math Reading
  • 8. Select a school using the menu below Joseph W. Catharine School Preliminary AYP Performance Academic Performance Participation* Reading Math Reading Math Increase/ Increase/ Decrease Decrease % At/Above from Last % At/Above from Last Proficient Year Result Proficient Year Result % Tested Result % Tested Result 2011 Goals: 72% 67% 95% 95% Students Overall 70.0 14.5 R 78.6 1.5 P - - - - White non-Hispanic - - - - Black/African American non-Hispanic 68.0 12.2 R 78.1 0.2 P - - - - Latino/Hispanic - - - - Asian/Pacific Islander 85.7 28.0 P 92.9 8.3 P - - - - Multi-racial/ethnic - - - - IEP-Special Education 31.0 15.6 R 44.8 29.4 R - - - - English Language Learners - - - - Economically Disadvantaged 70.0 14.4 R 78.6 1.4 P - - - - *Participation not calculated at this time Note: Calculations do not take into account two-year averages, Growth Model Legend or Confidence Intervals and other methods of target calculation used by PDE in determining a school's AYP Status P Group met measure R Group met target using Safe Harbor O Group did not meet measure
  • 9. Select a school using the menu below Stephen Decatur School Preliminary AYP Performance Academic Performance Participation* Reading Math Reading Math Increase/ Increase/ Decrease Decrease % At/Above from Last % At/Above from Last Proficient Year Result Proficient Year Result % Tested Result % Tested Result 2011 Goals: 72% 67% 95% 95% Students Overall 71.3 -0.8 O 82.5 -5.1 P - - - - White non-Hispanic 70.8 -0.5 O 84.7 -2.8 P - - - - Black/African American non-Hispanic 70.2 0.2 O 68.4 -11.6 O - - - - Latino/Hispanic 70.5 1.3 O 78.7 -12.1 P - - - - Asian/Pacific Islander 71.1 -13.7 O 86.8 -10.2 P - - - - Multi-racial/ethnic - - - - IEP-Special Education 29.8 -7.5 O 67.0 -9.4 O - - - - English Language Learners 52.4 52.4 R 57.1 57.1 R - - - - Economically Disadvantaged 67.3 -0.9 O 81.5 -2.6 P - - - - *Participation not calculated at this time Note: Calculations do not take into account two-year averages, Growth Model Legend or Confidence Intervals and other methods of target calculation used by PDE in determining a school's AYP Status P Group met measure R Group met target using Safe Harbor O Group did not meet measure
  • 10. Select a school using the menu below George W. Nebinger School Preliminary AYP Performance Academic Performance Participation* Reading Math Reading Math Increase/ Increase/ Decrease Decrease % At/Above from Last % At/Above from Last Proficient Year Result Proficient Year Result % Tested Result % Tested Result 2011 Goals: 72% 67% 95% 95% Students Overall 72.7 14.9 P 82.0 13.9 P - - - - White non-Hispanic - - - - Black/African American non-Hispanic 69.7 10.7 R 80.9 15.9 P - - - - Latino/Hispanic 88.0 38.0 P 92.0 21.2 P - - - - Asian/Pacific Islander - - - - Multi-racial/ethnic - - - - IEP-Special Education 66.7 38.6 R 83.3 17.7 P - - - - English Language Learners - - - - Economically Disadvantaged 72.7 13.9 P 82.0 13.6 P - - - - *Participation not calculated at this time Note: Calculations do not take into account two-year averages, Growth Model Legend or Confidence Intervals and other methods of target calculation used by PDE in determining a school's AYP Status P Group met measure R Group met target using Safe Harbor O Group did not meet measure
  • 11. ONISS - Reporting on Delegations, Residency and Extenuating Circumstances Requests 10/2010 - 5/2011 1 <--- Change Academic Division using the menu Oct.2010 to Academic Delegations EH36E Residency Cases Sent Delegations EH36E Residency Cases Received May 2011 Division School Name Sent Sent Sent Total Received Received Received Total Total Cases AD 1 Audenried Shs 0 5 1 6 1 0 0 1 7 AD 1 Carroll Charles Sch 0 2 3 5 0 1 0 1 6 AD 1 Douglas Stephen A Sch 0 8 0 8 0 3 0 3 11 AD 1 Edison Hs - Fareira Skills 7 24 3 34 2 7 3 12 46 AD 1 Fels Samuel Hs 6 36 11 53 8 4 18 30 83 AD 1 Fitzsimons Thomas Academy 0 8 0 8 0 2 0 2 10 AD 1 Frankford Hs 2 53 2 57 3 6 4 13 70 AD 1 Franklin Benjamin Hs 2 15 1 18 1 4 0 5 23 AD 1 Furness Horace Hs 1 2 0 3 0 1 0 1 4 AD 1 George Washington Hs 2 4 1 7 1 4 2 7 14 AD 1 Germantown Hs 3 18 1 22 2 3 0 5 27 AD 1 Gratz Simon Hs 2 22 0 24 2 3 2 7 31 AD 1 John Bartram Hs 0 8 0 8 2 2 0 4 12 Total Cases 66 370 94 524 53 99 86 222 740 Cases by Type Ranked Schools Sending 4 or More Students Ranked Schools Receiving 4 or More Students 15% Frankford Hs 57 Fels Samuel Hs 30 23% Lincoln Abraham Hs 54 Lincoln Abraham Hs 24 Delegation EH36E Fels Samuel Hs 53 Overbrook Hs 17 Residency Edison Hs - Fareira Skills 34 Olney Hs West-704 15 63% Overbrook Hs 33 Frankford Hs 13 Strawberry Mansion Hs 31 King Martin Luther Hs 13 Delegation EH36E Residency Sayre William L Ms 29 Edison Hs - Fareira Skills 12 Olney Hs West-704 28 Sayre William L Ms 10 400 King Martin Luther Hs 26 Kensington Intl Business Finance 9 300 Gratz Simon Hs 24 George Washington Hs 7 200 Germantown Hs 22 Strawberry Mansion Hs 7 Olney Hs East-705 21 Gratz Simon Hs 7 100 Rhodes E W Academy 18 Lamberton Robert Hs 6 0 Franklin Benjamin Hs 18 Germantown Hs 5 Sent Received Total Schools on Sending List 23 Total Schools on Receiving List 19
  • 12. ONISS - Reporting on Delegations, Residency and Extenuating Circumstances Requests 10/2010 - 5/2011 1 <--- Change Academic Division using the menu Oct.2010 to Academic Delegations EH36E Residency Cases Sent Delegations EH36E Residency Cases Received May 2011 Division School Name Sent Sent Sent Total Received Received Received Total Total Cases AD 6 Allen Ethan Sch 1 15 4 20 2 1 5 8 28 AD 6 Brown Joseph H Sch 0 3 0 3 0 1 2 3 6 AD 6 Carnell Laura H Sch 2 16 10 28 1 2 7 10 38 AD 6 Comly Watson Sch 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 2 AD 6 Creighton Thomas Sch 0 9 0 9 0 3 1 4 13 AD 6 Disston Hamilton Sch 1 9 16 26 0 3 10 13 39 AD 6 Edmunds Henry R Sch 2 16 15 33 2 5 0 8 41 AD 6 Fitzpatrick Aloysius 3 2 0 5 1 0 0 1 6 AD 6 Forrest Edwin Sch 0 4 3 7 0 1 2 3 10 AD 6 Frank Anne Sch 5 6 1 12 1 0 0 1 13 AD 6 Franklin Benjamin 0 4 3 7 0 4 3 7 14 AD 6 Greenberg Joseph Sch 0 1 7 8 0 3 2 5 13 AD 6 Hancock John Sch 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 3 4 Total Cases 28 161 187 368 23 78 100 186 548 Cases by Type Ranked Schools Sending 4 or More Students Ranked Schools Receiving 4 or More Students 7% Juniata Park Academy 37 Ziegler William H Sch 31 Delegation Edmunds Henry R Sch 33 Spruance Gilbert Sch 14 51% 42% EH36E Sheridan Philip H Sc 31 Disston Hamilton Sch 13 Residency Carnell Laura H Sch 28 Sheridan Philip H Sc 12 Disston Hamilton Sch 26 Webster John H Sch 11 Mayfair Sch 22 Carnell Laura H Sch 10 Delegation EH36E Residency Spruance Gilbert Sch 22 Lawton Henry W Sch 9 Allen Ethan Sch 20 Allen Ethan Sch 8 200 Lawton Henry W Sch 12 Edmunds Henry R Sch 8 150 Frank Anne Sch 12 Juniata Park Academy 8 100 Sullivan James J Sch 12 Franklin Benjamin 7 Webster John H Sch 12 Rhawnhurst Sch 6 50 Ziegler William H Sch 10 Greenberg Joseph Sch 5 0 Hopkinson Francis Sch 10 Creighton Thomas Sch 4 Sent Received Total Schools on Sending List 24 Total Schools on Receiving List 14
  • 13. Percent of Points Correct on 2011 PSSA* Math Percent of Points Correct on 2011 PSSA School <<< Select your School Here 65% Cut Point 11th Math 8th Math 7th Math 6th Math 5th Math 4th Math 3rd Math chart too cluttered? use checkboxes to hide data from the chart A.1 Math hide data hide data hide data hide data hide data hide data hide data E.4 25% A.2 Grade 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 35% A.1 80% 62% 69% 64% 69% 86% - A.2 85% 45% 68% 55% 73% 55% - E.3 A.3 45% A.3 86% 58% 62% 47% 49% 64% - B.1 72% 55% 43% 35% 40% 73% - 55% B.2 81% 59% 50% 71% 47% 65% - B.3 - - - - - - - E.2 65% B.1 C.1 89% 51% 54% 67% 63% 72% - C.2 84% 59% 56% - - - - 75% C.3 - 60% - 83% 76% 75% - D.1 93% 58% 54% 79% 42% 69% - 85% D.2 70% 59% 63% 66% 55% 76% - E.1 B.2 D.3 - - - - 66% - - 95% D.4 - - - - - 85% - E.1 91% 56% 54% 57% 63% 68% - E.2 - - 79% 53% 74% - - E.3 - 65% 73% 66% 66% 64% - D.4 B.3 E.4 - - - - 63% 79% - Students 49 51 53 52 45 50 - Reading Grade 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 D.3 C.1 A.1 73% 61% 59% 63% 65% 69% - A.2 72% 65% 63% 63% 62% 75% - A.3 - - - - - - - B.1 72% 65% 64% 64% 57% 61% - D.2 C.2 B.2 - 61% 63% 74% 59% 55% - B.3 78% 70% 68% 61% 44% 70% - D.1 C.3 Students 49 51 53 52 45 50 - Chart too cluttered? Use the 'hide data' checkboxes to remove data. Reading data not shown *Note: PSSA-M and PASA scores not included in the data
  • 14. Percent of Points Correct on 2011 PSSA* Math Percent of Points Correct on 2011 PSSA School <<< Select your School Here 65% Cut Point 11th Math 8th Math 7th Math 6th Math 5th Math 4th Math 3rd Math chart too cluttered? use checkboxes to hide data from the chart A.1 Math hide data hide data hide data hide data hide data hide data hide data E.4 25% A.2 Grade 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 35% A.1 80% 62% 69% 64% 69% 86% - A.2 85% 45% 68% 55% 73% 55% - E.3 A.3 45% A.3 86% 58% 62% 47% 49% 64% - B.1 72% 55% 43% 35% 40% 73% - 55% B.2 81% 59% 50% 71% 47% 65% - B.3 - - - - - - - E.2 65% B.1 C.1 89% 51% 54% 67% 63% 72% - C.2 84% 59% 56% - - - - 75% C.3 - 60% - 83% 76% 75% - D.1 93% 58% 54% 79% 42% 69% - 85% D.2 70% 59% 63% 66% 55% 76% - E.1 B.2 D.3 - - - - 66% - - 95% D.4 - - - - - 85% - E.1 91% 56% 54% 57% 63% 68% - E.2 - - 79% 53% 74% - - E.3 - 65% 73% 66% 66% 64% - D.4 B.3 E.4 - - - - 63% 79% - Students 49 51 53 52 45 50 - Reading Grade 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 D.3 C.1 A.1 73% 61% 59% 63% 65% 69% - A.2 72% 65% 63% 63% 62% 75% - A.3 - - - - - - - B.1 72% 65% 64% 64% 57% 61% - D.2 C.2 B.2 - 61% 63% 74% 59% 55% - B.3 78% 70% 68% 61% 44% 70% - D.1 C.3 Students 49 51 53 52 45 50 - Chart too cluttered? Use the 'hide data' checkboxes to remove data. Reading data not shown *Note: PSSA-M and PASA scores not included in the data
  • 15. Percent of Points Correct on 2011 PSSA* Math Percent of Points Correct on 2011 PSSA School <<< Select your School Here 65% Cut Point 11th Math 8th Math 7th Math 6th Math 5th Math 4th Math 3rd Math chart too cluttered? use checkboxes to hide data from the chart A.1 Math hide data hide data hide data hide data hide data hide data hide data E.4 25% A.2 Grade 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 35% A.1 80% 62% 69% 64% 69% 86% - A.2 85% 45% 68% 55% 73% 55% - E.3 A.3 45% A.3 86% 58% 62% 47% 49% 64% - B.1 72% 55% 43% 35% 40% 73% - 55% B.2 81% 59% 50% 71% 47% 65% - B.3 - - - - - - - E.2 65% B.1 C.1 89% 51% 54% 67% 63% 72% - C.2 84% 59% 56% - - - - 75% C.3 - 60% - 83% 76% 75% - D.1 93% 58% 54% 79% 42% 69% - 85% D.2 70% 59% 63% 66% 55% 76% - E.1 B.2 D.3 - - - - 66% - - 95% D.4 - - - - - 85% - E.1 91% 56% 54% 57% 63% 68% - E.2 - - 79% 53% 74% - - E.3 - 65% 73% 66% 66% 64% - D.4 B.3 E.4 - - - - 63% 79% - Students 49 51 53 52 45 50 - Reading Grade 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 D.3 C.1 A.1 73% 61% 59% 63% 65% 69% - A.2 72% 65% 63% 63% 62% 75% - A.3 - - - - - - - B.1 72% 65% 64% 64% 57% 61% - D.2 C.2 B.2 - 61% 63% 74% 59% 55% - B.3 78% 70% 68% 61% 44% 70% - D.1 C.3 Students 49 51 53 52 45 50 - Chart too cluttered? Use the 'hide data' checkboxes to remove data. Reading data not shown *Note: PSSA-M and PASA scores not included in the data
  • 16. Percent of Points Correct on 2011 PSSA* Math Percent of Points Correct on 2011 PSSA School <<< Select your School Here 65% Cut Point 11th Math 8th Math 7th Math 6th Math 5th Math 4th Math 3rd Math chart too cluttered? use checkboxes to hide data from the chart A.1 Math hide data hide data hide data hide data hide data hide data hide data E.4 25% A.2 Grade 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 35% A.1 80% 62% 69% 64% 69% 86% - A.2 85% 45% 68% 55% 73% 55% - E.3 A.3 45% A.3 86% 58% 62% 47% 49% 64% - B.1 72% 55% 43% 35% 40% 73% - 55% B.2 81% 59% 50% 71% 47% 65% - B.3 - - - - - - - E.2 65% B.1 C.1 89% 51% 54% 67% 63% 72% - C.2 84% 59% 56% - - - - 75% C.3 - 60% - 83% 76% 75% - D.1 93% 58% 54% 79% 42% 69% - 85% D.2 70% 59% 63% 66% 55% 76% - E.1 B.2 D.3 - - - - 66% - - 95% D.4 - - - - - 85% - E.1 91% 56% 54% 57% 63% 68% - E.2 - - 79% 53% 74% - - E.3 - 65% 73% 66% 66% 64% - D.4 B.3 E.4 - - - - 63% 79% - Students 49 51 53 52 45 50 - Reading Grade 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 D.3 C.1 A.1 73% 61% 59% 63% 65% 69% - A.2 72% 65% 63% 63% 62% 75% - A.3 - - - - - - - B.1 72% 65% 64% 64% 57% 61% - D.2 C.2 B.2 - 61% 63% 74% 59% 55% - B.3 78% 70% 68% 61% 44% 70% - D.1 C.3 Students 49 51 53 52 45 50 - Chart too cluttered? Use the 'hide data' checkboxes to remove data. Reading data not shown *Note: PSSA-M and PASA scores not included in the data
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 19. OSCAR Student Answer Sheet Building: 1892 Test Geometry Quarterly Assessment #1 Student E____ B____ User ID 116975 Instructor Jurisson Pd.5/6 Passcode 38 1 26 51 76 2 27 52 77 3 28 53 78 4 29 54 79 5 30 55 80 6 31 56 81 7 32 57 82 8 33 58 83 9 34 59 84 10 35 60 85 11 36 61 86 12 37 62 87 13 38 63 88 14 39 64 89 15 40 65 90 16 41 66 91 17 42 67 92 18 43 68 93 19 44 69 94 20 45 70 95 21 46 71 96 22 47 72 97 23 48 73 98 24 49 74 99 25 50 75 100
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22.
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25. OSCAR | School Performance Report Page 1 of 1 Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2 Average Score:67% Pass Rate:47% (Passing 97 / Tested 205) Cut Score: 70% or better Test Instructor Bell Pass% Passing Total Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2 Jurisson 5/6 56 9 16 Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2 Keaton 1/2 25 4 16 Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2 Keaton 3/4 25 4 16 Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2 Kileen 2 71 15 21 Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2 Kileen 4/5 43 7 16 Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2 Lorgen 2/3 18 4 22 Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2 Lorgen 7/8 42 9 21 Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2 Suggs 1 71 10 14 Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2 Suggs 4 70 12 17 Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2 Suggs 6/7 60 12 20 Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2 Volante 1 50 8 16 Geometry Quarterly Assessment #2 Volante 4 30 3 10 http://www.pasip.org/oscar/testanalyzer_solsummary_scoping_MLPie_DirectWrite.asp?TI... 5/5/2009