This document discusses sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) across the spectrum of renal diseases. It begins with an overview of renal glucose handling and the role of the SGLT2 channel. It then reviews the rationale for SGLT2 inhibition in diabetic and non-diabetic kidney diseases and basic SGLT2i pharmacology. Finally, it examines clinical outcomes data from trials demonstrating the cardiovascular, renal, and heart failure benefits of SGLT2is across levels of renal function and in diabetic and non-diabetic patients.
Call Girls Rishikesh Just Call 9667172968 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Sglt2 across the_spectrum_of_kidney_diseases
1. Sodium Glucose
Cotransporter Two Inhibitors
(SGLT2i) Across the Spectrum
of Renal Diseases
CHRISTOS ARGYROPOULOS MD, MS, PHD, FASN
DIVISION CHIEF, NEPHROLOGY, DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL
MEDICINE UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIENCES
3. Learning Objectives
1. Renal Glucose handling and the role of the
SGLT2 channel
2. Basic Pharmacology and Rationale for SGLT2
inhibition in (diabetic) kidney diseases
3. Clinical Outcomes and Safety of SGLT2i across
the spectrum of cardiorenal disease
5. Take home points for this section
1. The kidneys play an important role in carbohydrate homeostasis through the SGLT2
channel
2. This role is ultimately linked to the regulation of the prevailing level of renal function
3. One can target the kidney to develop anti-glycemic drugs that are efficacious
6. Role of the kidney in glucose homeostasis
1. Gluconeogenesis (cortex) mainly for utilization in the medulla
◦ Fasting post-absorptive state:
◦ 20-25% of the glucose released into the circulation is derived from the kidneys (12-55g)
◦ Kidneys use about 10% of the entire glucose pool (25-35g)
◦ Post-prandial state (4-5 hours after a meal):
◦ Kidneys responsible for 60% of endogenous glucose release (70g)
◦ Renal release of glucose x30% in pts with T2D
2. Reabsorption of filtered glucose by the proximal tubule
◦ GFR of 125 ml/min x 90-100 mg/dL = 160-180g filtered
◦ Nearly all of it is reabsorbed
◦ Primary renal contribution to glucose homeostasis
DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00116.2001
DOI: 10.1113/JP271904
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.07.033
DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00055.2009
DOI:10.1016/j.tips.2010.11.011
DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2014.06.018
7. Urinary Glucose Excretion (UGE), Tubular
Maximum Capacity for Glucose (TmG) and
Renal Threshold for Glucose Excretion (RTG)
DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2014.06.018
TmG is elevated in poorly controlled DM
• Kidneys exacerbate hyperglycemia
• Renal (+50-70 mg/min) > Hepatic (+24
mg/min) in T2D
Normal values:
TmG 375 mg/min
RTG: 180-200mg/dl
12. Take home points for this section
1. Hyperfiltration initiates diabetic kidney disease and is mediated by SGLT2
2. Abnormalities in Tubulo-Glomerular Feedback (TGF) in experimental diabetic kidney
disease (DKD) may be ameliorated by SGLT2i
3. There are pharmacokinetic and off target differences among SGLT2is whose
significance is small
4. We should be paying more attention to the proximal tubule
16. Hyperfiltration in experimental
diabetes is reduced by SGLT2i
SGLT2 and hyperfiltration in experimental diabetes
https://jasn.asnjournals.org/content/10/12/2569.long
Diabetes vs control Diabetes vs control under phlorizin
18. Acute and chronic effects of SGLT2
blockade in experimental DKD
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3349378/
Chronic and acute fx of SGLT2i on
proximal reabsorption are similar
Hyperglycemia major driver of
hyperfiltration & urine flow
Chronic effects of
SGLT2i on TGF are
expected to be
reduced but not
abolished
19. GLOMERULAR HYPERFILTRATION IN DM
AS A PRIMARY TUBULAR EVENT
Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2012. 74:351–75
Salt Paradox: the
inverse relationship
between
dietary NaCl and
GFR in DM ->
Due to changes in
the Na in macula
densa
20. Fact: A nephrology powerpoint can never
be complete without channel recordings
EXTRACELLULAR GLUCOSE
INDUCES CURRENTS IN SGLT(1/2)
EXPRESSING CELLS EXTRACELLULAR BUT NOT
INTRACELLULAR SGLT2I
INHIBITS GLUCOSE UPTAKE
Extracellular
Intracellular
doi: 10.14814/phy2.12058
doi: 10.1124/jpet.116.232025
21. SGLT2i cellular pharmacokinetics and off target effects
Dapa Empa
Kon (mol-
1/min)
1 x 106 1,138.5
Koff (min-1) 0.0067 0.01132
Cana inhibits mitochondrial
complex I and activates
AMPK
doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00328.2011
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
14: 83–90, 2012.
DOI: 10.2337/db16-0058
doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0273-y
1. Empa disengages fast from the SGLT2 & is
recovered in the urine
2. Dapa disengages slowly and is recycled through
the SGLT2 from the PT in the circulation
3. Cana as slow to disengage as dapa?
22. Understanding the effects of renal
function on (dosing of the) SGLT2i
Renal function affects both:
1. Pharmacodynamics: the drugs must be filtered to work
◦ Glucose lowering effect depends on SGLT2i activity & filtered glucose load which is a function of the
eGFR (antiglycemic effect will decline as eGFR declines)
◦ Non glycemic effects depend on the concentration of the drug at the tubules:
◦ Will not be affected by the eGFR but by the SNGFR ! )
◦ Will not exhibit a dose response curve (the receptor will be saturated especially at the hyperfiltering units)
2. Pharmacokinetics
◦ If renal elimination is substantial, then systemic drug exposure increases
◦ ? Systemic Adverse Effects (AE)↑ but post-glomerular AE↓
Dosing recommendations reflect efficacy (glucose lowering) and benefit vs risk (AE)
assessment
◦ Both refer to the primary indication (anti-diabetic effect)
◦ Will continue to change in the future as the drugs expand their indication to the cardiometabolic and
renal hard outcomes space
23. Are SGLT2i only going to “work” in DKD”?
Revisiting the Brenner Hypothesis
1. 1. As kidney disease progresses ,
the distribution of work-load will
develop a long tail with most of
the units hyperfiltrating
2. In early CKD, there will be a nice
symmetric distribution of work
balance among nephrons
3. In normal kidney function, work -
load is distributed rather
symmetrically and within a narrow
range
Am J Physiol. 1985 Sep;249(3 Pt 2):F324-37.
24. Drug Canagliflozin Dapagliflozin Empagliflozin Ertugliflozin
Common dosages 100mg, 300 mg 5mg, 10 mg 10mg, 25 mg 5, 15 mg
US brand names Invokana Farxiga Jardiance Steglatro
Dosage in renal impairment
eGFR ≥60 mL/minute/1.73 m2: No dose adjustment
necessary.
eGFR 30 to <60 mL/minute/1.73 m2: 100 mg once daily.
eGFR <30 mL/minute/1.73 m2: : initiation is not
recommended, but patients with albuminuria > 300
mg/day may continue 100mg daily to reduce the risk
of ESRD, doubling of creatinine, cardiovascular death
or heart failure hospitalization
ESRD, HD: Use contraindicated.
eGFR ≥45 mL/minute/1.73 m2: No
dose adjustment necessary.
eGFR 30 to <45 mL/minute/1.73 m2:
Use not recommended, unless
indicated for CHF
eGFR <30 mL/minute/1.73 m2: Use
not recommended
ESRD or HD: Use contraindicated.
eGFR ≥45 mL/minute/1.73 m2: No dose
adjustment necessary.
eGFR 30 to <45 mL/minute/1.73 m2: initiation not
recommended. Should be discontinued
when eGFR is persistently in this range
eGFR <30 mL/minute/1.73 m2, ESRD or dialysis:
safety and efficacy have not been
established, but it is not expected to be
effective in these populations
eGFR ≥60 mL/minute/1.73 m2: No dose adjustment
necessary.
eGFR 30 to <60 mL/minute/1.73 m2: Initiation not
recommended. Continued use not recommended
when eGFR is persistently in this range
eGFR <30 mL/minute/1.73 m2: Use contraindicated.
ESRD or dialysis: Use contraindicated.
Dosage in hepatic impairment
Mild or moderate impairment: No dose adjustment
necessary.
Severe impairment: Not studied, use not recommended
No dosage adjustment necessary,
has not been studied.
No dosage adjustment necessary
Mild or moderate impairment: No dose adjustment
necessary.
Severe impairment: Not studied, use not recommended
Bioavailability 65% 72% 78% ~100%
Peak Plasma time 1-2 hr 2 hr (fasting) – 3hr (fatty meal) 1.5hr 1 hr (fasting) – 2hr (after meal)
Protein binding 99% 91% 86.2% 93.6%
Volume of distribution 119L 118L 73.8L 85L
Elimination half life
100 mg dose: 10.6 hours, 300 mg dose: 13.1 hours
12.9 hours 12.4 hours
16.6 hours
Elimination Urine: 33%, Feces: 41.5% Urine: 75%, feces: 21% Urine: 54.4%, feces:41.2% Urine: 50.2%, feces: 40.9%.
Renal recovery of parent drug <1% < 2% ~20% 1.5%
Selectivity for SGLT2 over SGLT1 1:414 1:1200 1:2500 1:2000
Dapagliflozin separates dosing by indication
26. Take home points for this section
1. SGLT2i have broad cardiovascular, renal and heart failure benefits
2. Cardiorenal benefits are likely to be class, rather than agent specific
3. Effects on CKD don’t differ between diabetic and non-diabetic forms of CKD
4. Successful roll out is likely to have the same population level effects that ACE/ARBs
had
5. Don’t ask who will prescribe the SGLT2i for your patient, but when YOU will prescribe
SGLT2i and how you will do it like royalty
27. FDA approved indications of SGLT2i
in the USA (January 2021)
Indication Canagliflozin Dapagliflozin Empagliflozin Ertugliflozin
Antiglycemic
As an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Cardiovascular
Disease
Reduce the risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular
Events in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus and
established cardiovascular disease (CVD)
MACE: cardiovascular death, nonfatal
myocardial infarction and nonfatal stroke)
Reduce the risk of hospitalization for
heart failure in adults with type 2
diabetes mellitus and established
cardiovascular disease or multiple
risk factors
Reduce the risk of
cardiovascular death in adult
patients with type 2 diabetes
mellitus and established
cardiovascular disease.
Heart Failure (partial – see below) Reduce the risk of cardiovascular
death and hospitalization for heart
failure in adults with heart failure with
reduced ejection fraction NYHA II-IV
Renal Disease Reduce the risk of end-stage kidney disease
doubling of serum creatinine, cardiovascular
death, and hospitalization for heart failure in
adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus and diabetic
nephropathy with albuminuria ˃ 300 mg/day
Breakthrough Therapy Designation
(BTD) in the US for patients with
CKD with and without type-2 diabetes
(indication pending)
28. Current evidence supporting the FDA
approved label of SGLT2i
Cardiovascular safety trials (done to establish the safety of SGLT2i as antiglycemics)
EMPA-REG Outcome (empagliflozin), CANVAS/CANVAS-R (canagliflozin), DECLARE-TIMI-58
(dapagliflozin), VERTIS-CV (ertugliflozin)
Heart Failure Trials:
DAPA-HF (dapagliflozin), EMPEROR-REDUCED (empagliflozin)
Chronic Kidney Disease Trials:
CREDENCE (canagliflozin), DAPA-CKD (diabetic and non-diabetic CKD), EMPA-KIDNEY (still
ongoing)
32. SGLT2i reduce composite outcome of heart
failure/cardiovascular death and major
cardiovascular events
33. SGLT2i reduced rates of ESKD and the
composite kidney outcome of worsening
kidney function and ESKD
34. Biphasic eGFR changes upon initiation of SGLT2i
Canagliflozin (CREDENCE) Dapagliflozin (DAPA-CKD) Empagliflozin (EMPA-REG)
35. Renal Benefits of SGLT2i are observed across
demographics and levels of eGFR
https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.10140620
http://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2024816
36. Renal benefits
of SGLT2i are
observed
irrespective of
the presence of
diabetes type 2
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-020-00391-2
37. Effects of SGLT2i
on biomarkers and
clinical variables
(meta-analysis)
DOI: 10.1111/dom.13648
38. What is the mechanism of
cardiorenal protection?
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.05.010
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.05.012
39. Attempts to link the cardiac benefits of SGLT2i to
the heart have largely been unsuccessful
https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvaa323
https://doi.org/10.2337/db20-0921
40. Renal Safety of SGLT2i: reduce Acute
Kidney Injury (while increasing the risk of
volume depletion)
43. Adverse events are independent of
the baseline renal function
https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.10140620
44. SGLT2i vs RASi
PAYING FOR NEW THERAPIES
SGLT2i ARB
All Cause Mortality 0.76 0.97
Composite Kidney Outcome ~ESKD 0.61 0.75
Total Effect on ESKD 0.80 0.77
Heart Failure Hospitalizations 0.69 0.73
Projected Effect on ESKD must account for the competing outcome of death:
𝐻𝑅(𝐸𝑆𝐾𝐷)
𝐻𝑅(𝐷𝑒𝑎𝑡ℎ)
>
>
~
~
https://twitter.com/ChristosArgyrop/status/1301706984379482113?s=20
https://twitter.com/ChristosArgyrop/status/1301736105688014849?s=20
45. Universal adoption of SGLT2i will stabilize
incidence of ESKD over the next 10 years
• DAPA-CKD suggests benefits for non-diabetic
forms of CKD
• No subgroup benefits more than others
• Factoring life expectancy benefits, HR for
ESKD is ~0.80
• Modelled incidence of ESRD in 2030: 440
ppm
• 440 x 0.8 = 352 ppm (2004 incidence rate)
• Factoring population growth, the actual
incidence counts after SGLT2i ~127,000
(125,000 in 2017)
PAYING FOR NEW THERAPIES
JASN January 2019, 30 (1) 127-135;
46. Some Practical Issues
WHICH SGLT2I TO USE ?
1. Patient’s cardiorenal risk
2. Cardiovascular and renal end-
points
3. Level of renal function
4. What the insurance will pay (the
sophisticated ones will pay
attention to what you have put in
the note)
5. The copay the patient can afford
WHO, WHEN, HOW
1. Any physician who manages cardiorenal
risk should prescribe and not just
recommend
2. Cardio-renal effects are dose independent
Check renal function within 4 weeks
3. May use in patients with PAD unless it is
active (critical ischemia/arterial ulcers)
4. Patients on insulin may require reductions
up to 30% (especially if eGFR was high)
5. SGLT2i are add-on to max RASi but may
also use in those intolerant of RASi
47. Defending SGLT2i
in the chart
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1l1FyXHPCv
BJdcCnyJg-NGtElwlAfQ6fgL0jQdosflSs/edit
48. Are the SGLT2i the end of (D)CKD?
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 304: F156–F167, 2013.
Changes in glomerularhistology indiabetic glomerulopathy (A)Normal glomerulus. (B)Diffuse mesangial
Expansion with mesangial cell proliferation. (C) Prominent mesangial expansion with early nodularity and mesangiolysis. (D) Accumulation of
mesangial matrix forming Kimmelstiel–Wilson nodules. (E) Dilation of capillaries forming microaneurysms, with subintimal hyaline (plasmatic
insudation) (F) Glomerulosclerosis
Tubulointerstitial changes in diabetic kidney disease.
(A) Normal renal cortex. (B) Thickened tubular basement membranes and interstitial widening. (C) Arteriole with an intimal accumulation of
hyaline material with significant luminal compromise. (D) Renal tubules and interstitium in advancing diabetic kidney disease , with thickening
And wrinkled tubular basement membranes (solid arrows), atrophic tubules (dashed arrow), some containing casts, and interstitial widening with
fibrosis and inflammatory cells (dotted arrow).
. Proposed role of tubular reabsorption in glomerular hyperfiltration in diabetes mellitus. As illustrated in (1), the tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) refers to the inverse dependency of SNGFR on the luminal Na1, Cl2, and K1 concentration at the macula densa (MD). The glomerulotubular balance (GTB) refers to the flow dependence of tubular reabsorption upstream to the macula densa. SNGFR0 is the input to SNGFR independent of TGF. A primary increase in fractional tubular reabsorption (GTB) in diabetes mellitus elicits a reduction in the TGF signal at the macula densa (2), which increases SNGFR (3). The increase in fractional tubular reabsorption may in addition reduce the hydrostatic pressure in Bowman space (PBow) (2). By increasing the effective filtration pressure, the latter changes may also increase SNGFR, although probably to a minor degree (3). The resulting increase in SNGFR serves to partly restore the fluid and electrolyte load to the distal nephron (3). The concomitant prolonged glomerular hyperperfusion, however, could contribute to the development of diabetic glomerulosclerosis.