2. Electoral Processes
International IDEA
Intergovernmental Organization
29 member states
4 key areas:
Electoral processes
Constitution building
Political parties
Democracy and development
3. Electoral Processes
Electoral processes @ IDEA
Areas of expertise
Elections and technology
Media and elections
Electoral system design
Electoral management design
Direct democracy
Voting from abroad
Electoral justice
Electoral legal frameworks
Voter turnout
Elections and conflict
4. Electoral Processes
Provide guidance and good practices for the
introduction and maintenance of new
technologies. Focus on:
Transparency
Credibility
Sustainability
Elections Tech @ IDEA
Focus
6. Electoral Processes
Elections Tech @ IDEA
Types of resources
Publications: guides, handbooks policy
papers
Global database on the use of ICTs in
Elections
Training course
Online network
13. Electoral Processes
But: as one cannot “see, touch, or feel
bits and bytes” and such tasks cannot
be directly observed
Key electoral tasks electronic
14. Electoral Processes
Questions
• What can be done to ensure all stakeholdes that
technology delivers the required functionalities?
- is secure
- is accurate
- does not disenfranchise voters
- protects the secrecy of the vote
- protects data privacy
- correctly implements legal requirements
• How can trust and transparency be established?
15. Electoral Processes
The Use of Open Source
Technology in Elections
Source Code:
instructions executed by an ICT
system in a human readable format
Open Source Technology:
based on source codes that can be
freely viewed, used, shared, modified
16. Electoral Processes
Open Source and Elections
Many potential benefits
Transparency, accountability
Local ownership and capacity
Maintainability and sustainability
Recurring demand, especially where need for
transparency is high.
But: few available systems and implementations
18. Electoral Processes
Reasons for limited use:
Supply
fragmented market, no global election OST
community
vendors prefer current, ”closed source”
business models, have few incentives to
change
worry about intellectual property
19. Electoral Processes
Reasons for limited use:
Demand
more from civil society than from EMBs
limited awareness, common misconsceptions
(’insecure’, ’immature’, unprofessional’)
lack of successful examples
OST considered a technical detail
20. Electoral Processes
Certification of ICTs in Elections
“a systematic process carried out
by an accredited body to evaluate
whether
a given election technology
satisfies previously established
standards and/or legal
requirements.”
21. Electoral Processes
Why Certification of
ICTs?
Quality Assurance
Establish trust through an external actor
Enhance citizen confidence and election integrity
Ensure technology delivers the required functionality
Get confirmation of technology reliability and security
Demonstrate compliance with ”best international
practice”
Legal requirement
22. Electoral Processes
Elections as a Special
Case
In other sectors certification is common and builds on
Well-defined technical standards
Establised standardization bodies to set those
standards
Certification bodies
Long, flexible timeframes for standard setting and
certification
25. Electoral Processes
Practice Varies Greatly
between EMBs
What gets certified?
Who establishes the standards?
How are standards and requirements derived?
26. Electoral Processes
Practice Varies Greatly
between EMBs
What gets certified?
Who establishes the standards?
How are standards and requirements derived?
Who certifies, who is an ’independet third party’?
27. Electoral Processes
Practice Varies Greatly
between EMBs
What gets certified?
Who establishes the standards?
How are standards and requirements derived?
Who certifies, who is an ’independet third party’?
Different models: certification, review or expert opinions
28. Electoral Processes
Practice Varies Greatly
between EMBs
What gets certified?
Who establishes the standards?
How are standards and requirements derived?
Who certifies, who is an ’independet third party’?
Different models: certification, review or expert opinions
Transparency of the certification process
29. Electoral Processes
Biometrics (forthcoming)
Global trend towards biometrics in elections
Voter registration and verification in polling stations
Needs and expectations
Shortcomings and limitations
Sustainability and synergies
32. Electoral Processes
Increasing use of election ICTs
60% of EMBs use tabulation technologies
55% of EMBs use voter registration technologies
33. Electoral Processes
Increasing use of election ICTs
60% of EMBs use tabulation technologies
55% of EMBs use voter registration technologies
35% of use biometrics for voter registeration
34. Electoral Processes
Increasing use of election ICTs
60% of EMBs use tabulation technologies
55% of EMBs use voter registration technologies
35% of use biometrics for voter registeration
25% of EMBs use biometrics for voter verification
35. Electoral Processes
Increasing use of election ICTs
60% of EMBs use tabulation technologies
55% of EMBs use voter registration technologies
35% of use biometrics for voter registeration
25% of EMBs use biometrics for voter verification
20% of EMBs use electronic voting systems
IDEA published 2 ICT related resources at the end of last year:
The OST guide
And a Global Database on the use of ICTs in elections
IDEA published 2 ICT related resources at the end of last year:
The OST guide
And a Global Database on the use of ICTs in elections
IDEA published 2 ICT related resources at the end of last year:
The OST guide
And a Global Database on the use of ICTs in elections
First a simple and brief elanation of Source Codes and Open Source:
Source codes are the instructions executed by an ICT system in a human readable format
For who are they important: for those who build ICT systems – they write this code, but also for all who want to develop an indepth understanding of how a certain piece of technology works, what exactly it does, what quality it has, etc. Without source codes ICT systems remain ’black boxes’ even for experts
Open Source Software is software where the source code is ”free” to some extent
How free depends on the exact licence: free to use by anybody, free to be modified, free to be shared, free to be viewed and analysed are all possible options.
In some cases the freedom of OS can be greatly limited, but at the very least the codes of the system can be viewed and analysed by anybody interested.
- Important is ”free” does neccessarily mean not mean ”free of charge”. Especially for professional use also open source software alwasys needs to be maintained and developed, serviced by somebody – in some cases this is done by volunteers, but in many cases those services are paid for
Why is Opens Source technology relevant in elections?
A key benefit is the added transparency it adds: there are no secrets around open source software, everybody interested can analyze and understand it.
One EMB told us they use OS simply because they consider ”OS the most democratic technology”
Especially because of the added transparency, in some cases also because of local ownership and of cost reasons, OS in Election has been a recurring demand over many years.
This is especially true in field of electronic voting, but also voter registration and voter authentication in polling stations or when countries find it important to develop their own electoral technology.
But while there are many arguments for OS it turns out there are few available systems and implementations
Last year we surveyed over 100 EMBs. Only 21 told us they use OS, a few more at least considered it, but 68EMBs told us they have not even considered it as an option.
Clearly OST in elections is possible as EMBs from Nigeria to Norway, and from Egypt to New Zealand are using it.
For our publication we invited academics, vendors, opens source developers and EMBs to look into the reasons for this low uptake inspite of many possible advantages and what would need to change this.
What we found is challenges both on the supply and the demand side:
Elections are a fragmented marked that needs many different local solutions and no OST community has evolved to serve these needs comprehensively
Vendors servicing this marked greatly prefer ”closed source” models, not least because they would need to change from mostly providing products to providing services around products. And they seem reluctant to do so as the closed, ”proprietory” system works well for them now.
Significant worry of vendors is loosing intellectual property on their solutions – something that is not neccessarily the case, especially with ajusted OS licenses.
All of these factors lead to vendors often charging more for providing open systems
But: experience from countries such as Norway have shown that when EMBs demand OST, vendors are willing to provide it.
This leads to the second problem: the demand from EMBs.
Currently it seems the demand comes often from civil society, less so directly from the EMB
This is also not least due to an awareness issue: many are not aware of the issue at all, others who know OST sometimes have popular misconsceptsions such as:
OST is insecure, immature, unprofessional – none of which is true if developed in a professional manner
Some EMBs also stated a lack of successful examples that lead the way – even though at lease a few exist by now
Sometimes there is also a worry that too much openness may lead to exposure to criticism
Finally the choice of OST is often considered a technical detail and not ranking high in feasibility studies and procurement.
First a simple and brief elanation of Source Codes and Open Source:
Source codes are the instructions executed by an ICT system in a human readable format
For who are they important: for those who build ICT systems – they write this code, but also for all who want to develop an indepth understanding of how a certain piece of technology works, what exactly it does, what quality it has, etc. Without source codes ICT systems remain ’black boxes’ even for experts
Open Source Software is software where the source code is ”free” to some extent
How free depends on the exact licence: free to use by anybody, free to be modified, free to be shared, free to be viewed and analysed are all possible options.
In some cases the freedom of OS can be greatly limited, but at the very least the codes of the system can be viewed and analysed by anybody interested.
- Important is ”free” does neccessarily mean not mean ”free of charge”. Especially for professional use also open source software alwasys needs to be maintained and developed, serviced by somebody – in some cases this is done by volunteers, but in many cases those services are paid for
Why are EMBs certifiying their technologies
Because elections are so differet from other sectors and industries, there is no single ’best practice’ approach countries are taking towards cerification
The Certification guide:
- helps answering the questions above
- details benefits and challenges
- helps plannig and implementing certification according to the local context an based on different international experiences
- provides a Quality Assurance Framework with an overview of the steps involved in certification
Because elections are so differet from other sectors and industries, there is no single ’best practice’ approach countries are taking towards cerification
The Certification guide:
- helps answering the questions above
- details benefits and challenges
- helps plannig and implementing certification according to the local context an based on different international experiences
- provides a Quality Assurance Framework with an overview of the steps involved in certification
Because elections are so differet from other sectors and industries, there is no single ’best practice’ approach countries are taking towards cerification
The Certification guide:
- helps answering the questions above
- details benefits and challenges
- helps plannig and implementing certification according to the local context an based on different international experiences
- provides a Quality Assurance Framework with an overview of the steps involved in certification
Because elections are so differet from other sectors and industries, there is no single ’best practice’ approach countries are taking towards cerification
The Certification guide:
- helps answering the questions above
- details benefits and challenges
- helps plannig and implementing certification according to the local context an based on different international experiences
- provides a Quality Assurance Framework with an overview of the steps involved in certification
Because elections are so differet from other sectors and industries, there is no single ’best practice’ approach countries are taking towards cerification
The Certification guide:
- helps answering the questions above
- details benefits and challenges
- helps plannig and implementing certification according to the local context an based on different international experiences
- provides a Quality Assurance Framework with an overview of the steps involved in certification
Because elections are so differet from other sectors and industries, there is no single ’best practice’ approach countries are taking towards cerification
The Certification guide:
- helps answering the questions above
- details benefits and challenges
- helps plannig and implementing certification according to the local context an based on different international experiences
- provides a Quality Assurance Framework with an overview of the steps involved in certification
More detailed discussions of the various issues mentioned in this presentation are available in IDEAs publications on Electoins and Technology, including:
The technology chapter of the Electoral Managament Design Handbook
The policy paper on Electronic Voting
A guide on the use of Open Source technology in electoins
Finally, a guide on the Certification of Election Technology is planned for publication in November
More detailed discussions of the various issues mentioned in this presentation are available in IDEAs publications on Electoins and Technology, including:
The technology chapter of the Electoral Managament Design Handbook
The policy paper on Electronic Voting
A guide on the use of Open Source technology in electoins
Finally, a guide on the Certification of Election Technology is planned for publication in November
MEPA targets mid/upper level professionals that want to acquire specific knowledge and skills to work as election administrator and/or as part of Election Management Bodies (EMBs). By choosing MEPA, practitioners gain access to a broad group of alumni spread across the world. Becoming part of this community is a lifetime goal
MEPA targets mid/upper level professionals that want to acquire specific knowledge and skills to work as election administrator and/or as part of Election Management Bodies (EMBs). By choosing MEPA, practitioners gain access to a broad group of alumni spread across the world. Becoming part of this community is a lifetime goal