1. 26/04/14 18:08Lessons from a rock-star economist - FT.com
Pagina 1 di 2http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/0421d04e-cb42-11e3-ba95-00144feabdc0.html#axzz300dJqICd
L
April 25, 2014 11:40 am
Lessons from a rock-star economist
By Gillian Tett
‘Thomas Piketty has forced Americans to confront some of their contradictions’
ast week, I watched something rather peculiar unfold in a lecture theatre at the Graduate
Center of the City University of New York. A collection of earnest American economists
met to ponder a 577-page tract on inequality and tax policy by Thomas Piketty, a 42-year-old
professor of economics from Paris.
But instead of simply meeting in sombre, academic isolation, the event was so wildly popular
that tickets for it sold out – and the discussion had to be broadcast into a neighbouring
auditorium. The excitement did not stop there. In recent days, Piketty’s new book, Capital in
the Twenty-First Century, has soared up the bestseller lists and sparked endless blogs, debates and comment.
The White House and US Treasury have held talks with the Frenchman. An entire segment of the primetime television show Morning
Joe pondered its message of fiscal reform (with co-host Joe Scarborough declaring, “I just don’t think that a billionaire should be
paying just 14 per cent tax!”). Interest has been so high that the style-savvy New York magazine has dubbed Piketty a “Rock-Star
Economist”. Not bad for a leftwing French intellectual whom (almost) nobody in the US had ever heard of a month ago. Particularly
given that the book essentially argues that inherited wealth and inequality have soared in the west – and can only be contained by
much higher taxes.
What explains this feverish excitement? Some observers might blame it just on the facts: Piketty’s tome is exhaustively researched and
contains numerous statistics showing that the American economist Simon Kuznets was wrong to argue back in the 1950s that
economies would become more equal as they matured. On the contrary, Piketty argues that inequality has grown in the US and Europe
over the past decade because a new cadre of “supermanagers” has captured more wage income and returns on accumulated wealth
have outstripped the (modest) pace of economic growth. This means that people who are already rich are becoming richer, and many
inherit their wealth.
But I suspect that the real reason for Piketty’s rock-star reception is not the quality of his numbers but the fact that he has forced
Americans to confront a growing sense of cognitive dissonance. Nearly two-and-a-half centuries ago, when the country’s founding
fathers created the nation, they proudly believed they had rejected Europe’s tradition of inherited aristocracy and rentier wealth.
Instead, it was presumed that people ought to become rich through hard work, merit and competition.
Thus, inequalities of wealth were often tolerated because everyone hoped they could become rich. That was the American dream which
fostered admirable waves of entrepreneurial energy and – crucially – provided a social glue.
Piketty’s book shows that this dream is increasingly a myth. In decades past, he notes, America was indeed more egalitarian than
Europe. Today, wealth in the US is more unequally distributed than almost anywhere else, and returns on accumulated wealth are so
high that riches are increasingly inherited, not made. Most Americans instinctively know, or sense, this. And even before Piketty
arrived the issue was provoking unease. Recent surveys by the Pew Research Center, for example, suggest that two-thirds of Americans
think that their society is becoming more unequal, while 90 per cent of liberals, and 60 per cent of moderate conservatives, want the
government to address this. Meanwhile, media references to “inequality” and “America” were five times higher last year than in 2010
or 2005, according to the Factiva database; this month they have been six times higher.
What Piketty’s book has done is frame this issue with new clarity; like a modern Alexis de Tocqueville, he has forced Americans to
confront some of their contradictions (although de Tocqueville’s message back in the 19th century was completely different). That does
not mean the elite will accept his analysis; on the contrary, rightwing commentators have attacked him. Nor does it imply that
Congress will embrace his call for drastically higher tax rates; that seems utterly unlikely.
Home World Companies Markets Global Economy Lex Comment Management Life & Arts
Arts Magazine Food & Drink House & Home Lunch with the FT Style Books Pursuits Travel Columns How To Spend It Tools
©Shonagh Rae

2. 26/04/14 18:08Lessons from a rock-star economist - FT.com
Pagina 2 di 2http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/0421d04e-cb42-11e3-ba95-00144feabdc0.html#axzz300dJqICd
Printed from: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/0421d04e-cb42-11e3-ba95-00144feabdc0.html
Print a single copy of this article for personal use. Contact us if you wish to print more to distribute to others.
© THE FINANCIAL TIMES LTD 2014 FT and ‘Financial Times’ are trademarks of The Financial Times Ltd.
But, if nothing else, Piketty’s work touches a very raw nerve about the reality of the modern American dream. Of course, as a cynic – or
anthropologist – might note, a dream does not necessarily need to be “real” to work as social glue; all that is necessary is for enough
people to believe in the illusion. But can the American dream now survive a shift towards oligarchy? Can the egalitarian myth still act
as a social glue? These are the big questions implicit in his book; and if Piketty’s analysis is correct, they can only become more acute in
the coming years as inequality fuels not just more inequality – but greater cognitive dissonance too.
gillian.tett@ft.com
To comment on this article please post below, or email magazineletters@ft.com