University of Salford
School of Built Environment
BSc Architectural Design & Technology
BSc Building Surveying
BSc Construction Project Management
BSc Quantity Surveying
Procurement and Administration
RE-sit Assessment Brief - Coursework
Submission Deadline: Friday 14
th
August 16:00hrs
This assessment contributes 50% of the marks for the above module.
4000 word limit
1. BRIEF
1.1 About You
You are employed as independent construction procurement professional
1.2 The Proposed Project
Tower Developments Ltd is looking to speculatively develop an out of town retail complex on a Brownfield site in Eccles, the site was acquired 2 years ago with outline planning consent at a public auction. Following favourable market conditions resulting in two national chains signing pre-let agreement with Tower Development, the developer now wishes to move forwards with the scheme.
The overall development will comprise of the following retail units:
1 x 3.000m
2
Unit, which has been pre-let to a national toy store
2 x 900m
2
Units
2 x 700m
2
Units
1 x Drive thru type restaurant, which has been pre-let by a coffee shop Franchisee.
Along with associated external works
All buildings on the site were cleared prior to Tower’s acquisition. The site is close to a local school and is accessed from a main highway.
The budget to cover the total development cost, inclusive of construction works, external works, statutory and professional fees is estimated to be £15 million. The completion date is critical given the pre-let agreements stipulate occupancy most occur within 6 months. If this is not achieved the agreements are likely to be terminated.
1.3 Assessment Requirements
Task 1 (50 marks):
Tower Developments have requested that you produce a report which provides an analysis of the key procurement issues for their consideration. The report should include a detailed appraisal leading to a recommendation for an appropriate, value-led procurement strategy and system for the construction of the proposed project.
Task 2 (10 marks):
It is also a requirement within the same report to identify a suitable main form of contract and explain to Tower Developments the key principles and advantages of using a standard form of contract.
Task 3 (30 marks):
Tower Developments
have asked you to explain in the report how best to find and appoint the company/ies who have the ability to successfully deliver the necessary design and construction skills to complete the project and provide best value in meeting the clients requirements.
Your response should clearly identify the key criteria which should be adopted in the selection processes for the designers and contractor.
Report and Presentation (10 marks):
2. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
REPORT WRITING
There are many publications on how to write a report but a good starting point is
http://www.careers.salford.ac.uk/cms/resources/uploads/files/StudyBasics%20Scientific%20Report%20Writing%20Updated%20(web.
History Class XII Ch. 3 Kinship, Caste and Class (1).pptx
University of SalfordSchool of Built Environment BSc Archite.docx
1. University of Salford
School of Built Environment
BSc Architectural Design & Technology
BSc Building Surveying
BSc Construction Project Management
BSc Quantity Surveying
Procurement and Administration
RE-sit Assessment Brief - Coursework
Submission Deadline: Friday 14
th
August 16:00hrs
This assessment contributes 50% of the marks for the above
module.
4000 word limit
1. BRIEF
1.1 About You
You are employed as independent construction procurement
professional
1.2 The Proposed Project
Tower Developments Ltd is looking to speculatively develop an
out of town retail complex on a Brownfield site in Eccles, the
2. site was acquired 2 years ago with outline planning consent at a
public auction. Following favourable market conditions
resulting in two national chains signing pre-let agreement with
Tower Development, the developer now wishes to move
forwards with the scheme.
The overall development will comprise of the following retail
units:
1 x 3.000m
2
Unit, which has been pre-let to a national toy store
2 x 900m
2
Units
2 x 700m
2
Units
1 x Drive thru type restaurant, which has been pre-let by a
coffee shop Franchisee.
Along with associated external works
All buildings on the site were cleared prior to Tower’s
acquisition. The site is close to a local school and is accessed
from a main highway.
The budget to cover the total development cost, inclusive of
construction works, external works, statutory and professional
fees is estimated to be £15 million. The completion date is
critical given the pre-let agreements stipulate occupancy most
occur within 6 months. If this is not achieved the agreements
are likely to be terminated.
1.3 Assessment Requirements
Task 1 (50 marks):
Tower Developments have requested that you produce a report
which provides an analysis of the key procurement issues for
3. their consideration. The report should include a detailed
appraisal leading to a recommendation for an appropriate,
value-led procurement strategy and system for the construction
of the proposed project.
Task 2 (10 marks):
It is also a requirement within the same report to identify a
suitable main form of contract and explain to Tower
Developments the key principles and advantages of using a
standard form of contract.
Task 3 (30 marks):
Tower Developments
have asked you to explain in the report how best to find and
appoint the company/ies who have the ability to successfully
deliver the necessary design and construction skills to complete
the project and provide best value in meeting the clients
requirements.
Your response should clearly identify the key criteria which
should be adopted in the selection processes for the designers
and contractor.
Report and Presentation (10 marks):
2. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
REPORT WRITING
There are many publications on how to write a report but a good
starting point is
http://www.careers.salford.ac.uk/cms/resources/uploads/files/St
udyBasics%20Scientific%20Report%20Writing%20Updated%20
(web).pdf
4. FORMAT
All submissions should have a cover sheet identifying the
module, the date and the student’s name and roll number. In
addition to the in-text citations, all submissions shall have a
reference list (and an optional bibliography), listing the sources
used in the preparation of the report. [The School has adopted
the Harvard system (APA 6th) as standard.
LENGTH
Maximum 4,000 words report excluding references,
bibliography, cover sheet or appendices (if any).
SUBMISSION
This assignment MUST be submitted electronically through
Turnitin®
Further information and support for students using Turnitin can
be found here:
http://www.salford.ac.uk/library/help/blackboard-and-
collaborate
3. ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
Item
Marks
Evaluation and Selection of a procurement route suitable for the
project scenario given
50
Selection of a standard form of contract and an associated
explanation of the benefits of adopting a standard form.
10
Company Selection processes
5. 30
Presentation, formatting etc
10
4. MARKING SCALE
At Undergraduate Level 4, 5 and 6 the following marking scale
shall be used:
Outstanding 90% – 100%
Excellent 80% – 89%
Very good 70% – 79%
Good 60% – 69%
Fair 50% – 59%
Adequate 40% – 49%
Unsatisfactory 30% – 39%
Poor 20% – 29%
Very poor 10% – 19%
Extremely poor 0% – 9%
5. LEARNING OUTCOMES ADDRESSED
Critically evaluate client objectives and determine the
appropriate selection of procurement systems
Analyse project objectives under time, cost and quality,
sustainability issues
Use techniques such as procurement matrices to assist in
decision making
Develop an understanding regarding the selection of appropriate
contract forms
Appreciate issues and implications in connection with
6. contractor selection
Develop skills in report writing
Develop skills in procurement research
6. RETURN & FEEDBACK ARRANGEMENTS
Coursework marks and feedback will be available within 15
working days of your submission and will be loaded into
Blackboard.
IMPORTANT INFORMATION
I. OBLIGATION TO KEEP COPIES OF ALL WORK
Students MUST keep a spare copy of all work which they hand
in as well as the receipt which is issued to them at the time of
submission.
II. PROVISIONAL NATURE OF MARKS & GRADES
All marks and grades issued to students are provisional until
ratified by examination boards.
III. LAST DATE FOR SUBMISSIONS
Submissions made after 16:00hrs on the fourth working day
following submission will be deemed inadmissible and recorded
as a non-submission.
7. IV. ELECTRONIC SUBMISSIONS
If the submission document file up-loaded to Blackboard is
corrupt and cannot be viewed - This is
classed as a NON submission
. It is the responsibility of the student to ensure their
submission material can be opened by others.
To ensure your submission can be opened please follow this
simple step:
Go back to the submission area and the blue button that was
labelled Submit will now be a button labelled View – select this
button and what you see upon doing so will be the file/format
that your Lecturer can see. If you can open and view the
document then so can the lecturer.
V. PENALTIES FOR LATE SUBMISSION
Where coursework is submitted late, the following
penalties shall be applied to the mark:
(a) if the work is no more than four working days late, then
five marks shall be deducted for each working day (08:30-16:00
Mon- Thursday or part thereof) , but if the work would
otherwise pass then the mark for the work shall be reduced to
no lower than the pass mark for the component
(b) if the work is no more than four working days late and
marked and the mark is lower than the pass mark, then no
penalty shall be applied;
8. (c) if the work is more than four working days late then it
cannot be submitted and shall be recorded as a non-submission
(NS).
VI. ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT
The University takes a serious view of all acts of academic
misconduct. Such acts are considered dishonest and as attempts
to gain unfair advantage. Acts of academic misconduct can take
many forms. They are likely to fall into one or more of the
following categories:
a)
Plagiarism
Plagiarism involves taking the work of another person or source
and using it as if it were one’s own.
b)
Self plagiarism
Self plagiarism (or double submission)
is resubmitting previously submitted work on one or more
occasions (without proper acknowledgement). This may take the
form of copying either the whole piece of work or part of it.
Normally credit will already have been given for this work.
c)
Collusion
Collusionoccurs when, unless with official approval (e.g. in the
case of group projects), two or more students consciously
collaborate in the preparation and production of work which is
ultimately submitted by each in an identical, or substantially
9. similar, form and/or is represented by each to be the product of
his or her individual efforts. Collusion also occurs where there
is unauthorised co-operation between a student and another
person in the preparation and production of work which is
presented
as the student’s own.
d)
Falsifying experimental or other investigative results
This could involve a range of things that make it appear that
information has been collected by scientific investigation, the
compilation of questionnaire results etc whereas in reality it has
been made up or altered to provide a more favourable result.
e)
Taking unauthorised material (including electronic devices) into
an examination
f)
Contracting another to write a piece of assessed work / Writing
a piece of assessed work for another
This involves any means whereby a person does work on behalf
of another. It includes assessments done for someone else in
full or in part by a fellow student, a friend or family member. It
includes sitting an examination for someone else. It also covers
obtaining material from internet ‘cheat sites’ or other sources of
work. Penalties for this type of unfair means will normally
apply both to a student of the University who does work on
behalf of another and a student of the University who has work
done for him/her.
g)
10. Copying from, or communicating with, another examination
candidate during an examination
h)
Bribery
This involves giving money, gifts or any other advantage to an
academic member of staff which is intended to give an unfair
advantage in an assessment exercise.
VII. Particular care should be taken in respect of the
following:
a)
Getting help from others / helping others
Students are encouraged to discuss and share ideas and
information, however those who knowingly assist others to
commit academic misconduct whether or not for payment (e.g.
by giving another student the opportunity to copy part or all of
a piece of work, by providing copies of assessments or by
providing bespoke assignments to another student) will be
subject to the same penalties as those who use unfair means.
Students must ensure that they protect their own work, submit it
themselves and do not allow other students to use their memory
stick and/or print off work on their behalf.
b) Use of Readers/Note Takers
Students with special learning requirements who require the
services of readers or note takers are advised to use
appropriately trained individuals. Further advice can be
obtained from the Disability Service Team within Student Life
Directorate.
http://www.advice.salford.ac.uk/disability
11. c)
Referencing
Students using work which has been produced by other people
within an assignment will need to ensure that they acknowledge
or reference the source of the work. Students should check with
their Schools for particular requirements. Marks may be
deducted for poor referencing. If poor referencing is extensive
throughout a piece of work it could appear that the student is
trying to claim credit for the work and he/she may be deemed to
have committed plagiarism. Guidance on good referencing
practice is available from Schools or may be provided through
research training programmes, the Study Skills Programme
located in Student Life and on-line guidance provided by
Information & Learning Services. Some useful resources are:
http://www.advice.salford.ac.uk/
Penalties
If satisfied that unfair means has occurred, a penalty will be
imposed on the student. Penalties vary depending on whether
the matter is referred to the School Academic Misconduct Panel
or the University Disciplinary Committee and on the particular
circumstances. A range of penalties may be imposed including:
-
A penalty of 0% for the assessment
component
attempted using unfair means;
-
12. A penalty of 0% for the
module
affected by unfair means;
-
A penalty of 0% for the
module
affected by unfair means
and
the marks of
all other modules at that academic level
being capped at the pass mark (40% for undergraduates, 50%
for post graduates).
In the most severe cases, where there are aggravating factors
(e.g. that this is a repeated case of the use of unfair means by a
student at an advanced stage in their studies), a student found
guilty of using unfair means may be
permanently expelled from the University.
Further details of the Academic Misconduct procedure are
available from:
http://www.governance.salford.ac.uk/page/student_policies
Pre-submission checklist
Before submitting your assessment; ask yourself the following
questions, just to be sure you’ve met all the requirements:
Have I correctly referenced all the sources which I have used?
Have I used Turnitin to check my referencing and bibliography
so that my tutor knows where I have found all my information?
Have I completed the assignment within the word limit and/or
stated my word count?
Have I used a spell checker and proof read my work?