Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine KG and Vector search for enhanced R...
Assessing educational policy and objectives (2)
1. Assessing Fire Safety Policy for
Educational Establishment
MOHD FADZIL MOHD IDRIS(Ph.D)
Faculty of Manufacturing & Technology Management,
UMP, Kuantan Pahang.
1
2. Introduction
BUILDING ASSESSMENT O
B
BUILDING ARCHITECT J
PROGRESS ENGINEERS E
P
C
QUANTITY O
T
PROFESSIONALS SURVEYORS L
I
CONTRACTORS I
V
C
LOCAL BUILDING E
Y
AUTHORITY OWNER S
O 2
FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
R
3. Fire Safety and Building Life
Cycle (Building Process)
• Design & Approval
• Construction
• Commissioning
• Accidental Coverage /Recovery
• Improvement, Rebuilding,
Maintenance, Alteration
3
4. • Stages of Fire Building Construction Activities, Actions
Safety Development Process & Requirements
I Design & Approval - Assessment on Fire
Safety,(Regs & Act)
- Costing,
- Performances
- Maintainability
- Reliability
- Safety Plans & Supervision
• II Construction - Health and Safety on Site
(workers and staff, visitors)
- Layout Plan
- Housekeeping and Material
distribution on site
- Security and Monitoring on site
• III Commissioning - Introducing new system if possible
- Introduce Support System
- Occupancies Responsibilities
- Checking and Maintenance
• IV Accidental Coverage - Insurance for Recovery Lifes &
Properties
- Structural Stability
- Performance Assessment
- Notify the Safety and Risk Factors
- Loss Estimation
•
V Improvement, - Rechecking the Regs, & Acts,
Rebuilding or - Layout, Boundary etc
Maintenance or - Building Structural
Alteration or - Building Materials
Maintenance - Building Services
- Building Environment
Diagram 1.0: Fire Safety and Building Life Cycle
5. Fire Safety In Buildings
• Building Selection
• Building Purpose
• Building Design
• Selection of Materials
• Layout and Planning
• Construction
• Commissioning and
• Maintenance
• Regulations, Codes and Standards, Cost. 5
7. FACTORS TO BE
CONSIDERD
• LEGAL REQUIREMENTS AND INDUSTRIAL DEMAND
– FIRE ACT 1988
– UNIFORM BUILDING BY LAW (UBBL)1984
– OSH ACT 1997
• ORGANIZATION’S POLICY
– SAFETY FOR ALL & BENEFITS COME ALONG
• SUSTAINABILITY
– BUSINESS PROJECTIONS
– CONTINUITY
– PROFITS
– SAVINGS
– PROSPEROUS
– REPUTATION
8. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
• Fire Service Act 1988:
– Part V (28)(1): Every designated premises
shall require a fire certificate.
– Part V (28)(2): Fire Certificate shall be
renewable annually.
– Part V (28)(3): Subsection(1) shall not apply
to premises appropriated to, and used solely or
mainly for ,public religious worship, or
premises consisting of or comprised in a house
that is occupied as a single private dwelling.
9. Fire Service Act 1988
• Part V (33): Where there is no fire
certificate in force in respect of any
designated premises the owner of the
premises shall be guilty of an offence.
• Part V (35)(5): fine <RM 10,000 or < 5 yrs
imprisonment for a term or both and shall
liable to further fine of RM 1000 each day
during which the offence is continued after
the conviction.
10. Uniform Building By Law 1984
• No person shall occupy or permit to be
occupied any building or any part thereof
unless a certificate of fitness for occupation, a
partial certificate of fitness for occupation or a
temporary certificate of fitness for occupation
has been issued under these By-laws for such
building and any failure to comply with this
by-law shall render such person liable to
prosecution under the Act.
(Act means the Street, Drainage and Building
Act 1974)
11. Objectives of OSH Act 1994
To secure safety & health of persons at
work
To protect other persons at the place of
work
To promote appropriate and suitable
environment for persons at work
To promote use of industry codes of
practice
12. Application of OSHA ‘94
Manufacturing
Mining and Quarrying Finance, Insurance
Construction Real Estate
Agriculture, Forestry &
Fishing Public Services &
Transport, Storage & Statutory Authorities
Communication
Wholesale & Retail Trade
Hotels & Restaurants Except:
Utilities
– Electricity onboard ships &
– Gas
armed forces
– Water
– Sanitary Services
13. Making Decision
• WHY? – Needs, uncertainties in construction
fields / building organization
i.e: Fire Safety Policy & Objectives
for Educational Establishment
- to reach a satisfactory level of safety
- to give good value for money
- to sustain its continuation of mission,
- benefits and priority for the future development.
- to fulfill the legal requirement
13
14. Decision Making Process
Experience Primary data Document Analysis
Statistics Dept.
Survey News
Questionnaire Know-how Reports
and
Knowledge Building
Experimentation Regulations
& Legislations
Professional Judgment
14
15. Definition
Knowledge
- The nature of desired outcomes
Know –How
- The Course of action which will ensure the
achievement of the desired outcomes
Delphi
- The susceptible of two interpretation or more
meaning, ambiguous, of doubtful meaning,
equivocal, obscure or uncertain position or
classification
15
16. Why Delphi Technique?
• To discuss the uncertainty of several factors
• To obtain a group consensus on a forecast.
• To be able to assess policy or objectives (In this
case Fire Safety In Educational Estb.)
• “Delphi may be characterized a s a method for
structuring a group communication process so that
the process is effective in allowing a group of
individuals as a whole, to deal with a complex
problem”.(Linstone and Turoff)
16
17. Delphi Technique:
Approach & Procedure
• Anonymity (freedom from
identification or state of being
noticed)
• Controlled feedback
• Statistical group response
17
18. Delphi Approaches
• Selection of Members
• Meetings (Venue & Dates)
• Invitation letter
• Set Topic & Questionnaires
• Incentive and Appreciation
18
19. Professional Judgment
• Loss Impact
( Individual, Community, District,
National or International level)
• Priorities/Importance
• Using Scaling Number
19
20. 4 Major Elements
( Solving Problems)
• Prioritization of Issues
• Setting up Objectives
• Design suitable courses of
action
• Method to assess or evaluate
20
21. WHAT IS A POLICY?
• A policy is a deliberate plan of action to guide decisions and
achieve rational outcome(s). The term may apply to
government, private sector organizations and groups, and
individuals. Presidential executive orders,
corporate privacy policies, and parliamentary
rules of order are all examples of policy. Policy differs from
rules or law. While law can compel or prohibit behaviors
(e.g. a law requiring the payment of taxes on income) policy
merely guides actions toward those that are most likely to
achieve a desired outcome.
• Policy or policy study may also refer to the process of
making important organizational decisions, including the
identification of different alternatives such as programs or
spending priorities, and choosing among them on the basis of
the impact they will have. Policies can be understood as
political, management, financial, and administrative
mechanisms arranged to reach explicit goals.
22. When the term policy is used
It may also refer to:
• Official government policy (legislation or
guidelines that govern how laws should be put
into operation)
• Broad ideas and goals in political manifestos and
pamphlets
• A company or organization's policy on a
particular topic. For example, the equal
opportunity policy of a company shows that the
company aims to treat all its staff equally
23. Fire Safety Policy
i.e:-
• Fire Free Educational Environment
Fire Safety Objectives
i.e:-
•Human Life
•Property Protection
•Educational Continuity
•Educational Environment
•Public Anxiety
•Economy 23
24. Assessing Fire Safety Policy
• To Inculcate Positive Values.
i.e:-
- To Minimize the Level Of Risk
- To Maximize the Level of Safety
- To Create/Maintain the Educational
Environment
- To Ensure the Adequacy of the Services and
Infrastructure, etc.
- To set a Standard Fire Safety Evaluation
Scheme 24
26. Life Safety:Occupant
-Maturity, Aged, Child
-Ability to Escape/ Evacuate
-Location
-Physical Requirement or
Building Provision
-Human Resource
Management, etc. 26
27. Property Protection
• Within a Room
• Within a Building
• Outside Building
• Portable or Fixed Appliances
• Fire Engine &Fire Officers
• Rescue Team
• Building Materials etc.
27
28. Educational Environment
• Environmental Temperature
• Good Views
• Air Circulation
• Mobility
• Good Odor
• Acoustics
• Sun Light
• Shading
• Number of occupants 28
29. Public Anxiety
• The standard of fire safety
• Allocation and management
• Political and Moral Issues
• Organizational Reputation
29
31. PURPOSE OF STUDY
Providing guidelines to ensure the safety of the
establishments from danger of fire.
Formulating evaluation checklists consisting of
numbers which is applicable to assess fire safety
components
Establishing the procedure to evaluate fire safety standard
via the set objectives, tactics and components to achieve
the fire safety policy
32. Source(s) of Ignition Percentage %
1/ Carelessness 38.4
2/ Electrical Appliances 25.6
3/ Not known 12.8
4/ Arson 9.3
5/ Smoking habit 5.8
6/ Natural Disasters 5.8
7/ Other specify 2.3
Sources of fire safety knowledge Percentages
General reading 34.6 %
Mass media and friends 17.7 %
Notices and sign system 11.8 %
Rules and regulations 9.9 %
Subjects taught in schools or colleges 8.1 %
Extra Co-curriculum activities 7.1 %
Assigned Responsibility 4.8 %
Past Fire Accident(s) 3.1 %
Other 1.5 %
Profession 1.3 % 32
33. Percentages %
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
Classroom
Staffroom
Canteen
Laboratory/W
orkshop
Library/Resou
rce Centre
Computer
room
Building Areas
Assembly Hall
Sport Centre/
Gymnasium
Store room
Types of Fire Threat within the Educational Premises
Hostel/Accom
odation
Dining hall
Gases
33
Chemical
Electricity
34. Ranking
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Dormitory
Dining
Hall/kitchen
Room(Single)
Canteen
Common Room
Areas
Utilities Room
Accomodation Building
Store Room
Warden Flat
The Most Important Areas For Fire Safety System Within Hostel/
Prayer Room
Series1
34
35. Priority Ranking Less Priority
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Laboratory
Hostel
Workshop
Computer centre
Canteen
Dining Hall
Resource Centre
Library
Areas
Classroom
Staff room
Office/General
(Areas Within Educational Buildings)
office
Rank of Vulnerability Towards Fire Hazards
Lecture Hall
Tutorial
Sport Centre
Assembly hall
Series1
35
36. Building Area Percentage % Fire Safety Objective within
Educational Establishment and it’s
priority.
Classroom 33.5 Life / Mission / Property
Hostel 21.0 Life / Property
Library 12.4 Property / Cost - books, references,
equipment
Laboratory 10.3 Property / Environment or high hazard
Staffroom 6.5 Life / Mission or teaching references
Computer 3.9 Property / Cost or electrical items
General office 3.4 Property / Mission - records
Individual 2.8 Property or teaching or learning
office references
Studio 2.4 Property or combustible materials
Other 2.2
Workshop 1.1 Property or High hazard area
Kitchen 0.6 Property or electrical and source of
ignition
37. The Areas Within Educational Establishment
Which Are Very Important To Be Considered
For Fire Safety System Installation
DINING
HALL
HOSTEL
WORK
SHOPS
STAFF
ROOM
RESOURCE
CENTRE
Areas
COMPUTER
CENTRE
Series1
LIBRARY
CANTEEN
GYMNASIUM/
SPORT CENTRE
LABORATORY
CLASS
ROOM/
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Priority Ranking from 1 to 8 Less Priority
37
38. EVALUATION PROCESS
EVALUATION CONSIDERATION
Quantitative appraisal Analysis
DELPHI TECHNIQUE
QUESTIONNAI QUESTIONNAI
RE Involving
1 RE 2
Professional
building judgment
occupants
POINT SCHEME
39. EVALUATION PROCESS
The first fire safety THE MAKING OF EVALUATION
evaluation scheme was Establish the NORM
POINT SCHEME
developed for the patients
area in hospitals for Establish the component of fire safety
Department of Health and
Formulating policy, objectives and tactics to
Social Services in June
1982 achieve
Development and Setting up questionnaire for the Delphi Group
application of the scheme Attributing contribution numbers or points scheme
is now concentrated on
educational establishment for each fire safety components, tactics,
in Malaysia objectives and policy based on their inter-
relationships
Setting up the Evaluation/Assessment Checklist
Application of Checklist
40. WHY POINTS SCHEME?
(NUMERICAL ASSESSMENT)
A convincing method for non-technical
professionals and authorities
Evaluation based on acceptable level
Evaluation on specific area of the building
will lead to overall numerical assessment of the
premise with regard to fire safety requirement
and performance
Comparison between buildings of the same
group can facilitate authorities in decision
making process for current and future
development
41. FRAMEWORK INTERACTION POINTS
SCHEME
QUESTIONNAIRE
Explanatory Notes
A guide to experts and
respondents on limitation of the
Interaction questionnaire
Boxes
Boxes and arrows between levels
of hierarchical framework
Contribution
Numbers between 0 to 10 is given
to represent a range of limitation
43. OBJECTIVES VS POLICY
POLICY
OBJECTIVES Average Percentages
Life Safety 9.6 25%
Property Protection 7.0 18%
Education Continuity 6.9 18%
Education Environment 5.3 14%
Public Anxiety 5.0 13%
Economy 5.3 14%
44. Rank Order of The Fire Safety
Objectives
• In Achieving the Fire Safety Rank
Policy Life safety 1
• Based on Loss of Educational Continuity 2
Life
• Based on Concern Property Protection 3
• Based on Priority Educational 3
• Based on Loss Environment
Impact Public Anxiety 4
Economy 5 44
45. NORM VALUES
COMPONENTS POINTS(%) V2%
A = BUILDING OCCUPANTS 8.26 8
B = PREPARED FOR FIRE EMERGENCY 9.12 9
C = FIRE PREVENTION 9.63 9.5
D = INTERNAL ENVIRONMENT 7.64 7.5
E = SERVICES 6.33 6
F = DETECTION 8.16 8
G = COMMUNICATION AND ALARM 8.12 8
H = EGRESS OR ESCAPE 5.33 5.5
I = FIRE FIGHTING 6.87 7
J = PROTECTED AREAS 5.92 6
K = AUTO SUPPRESSION 6.89 7
L = SMOKE MOVEMENT CONTROL 6.64 7
M = BUILDING STRUCTURE 7.45 7.5
N = EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT 3.64 4_
100
45
46. Building Type: A B C D E F
Building Area: Sport halls Percentages Contribution
Components (Pp) Values(Nc)
A. Building Occupants 90% 8 = 720
B. Preparedness For Fire Emergency 70% 9 = 630
C. Fire Prevention 80% 9.5 = 760
D. Internal Environment 80% 7.5= 600
E. Services 80% 6 = 480
F. Detection System 60% 8 = 480
G. Communication and Alarm 50% 8 = 400
H. Egress or Escape 95% 5.5= 522.5
I. Fire Fighting 50% 7 = 350
J. Protected Areas 85% 6 = 510
K. Auto Suppression 0 7 = 0
L. Smoke Movement/Control 75% 7 = 525
M. Building Structure 80% 7.5= 600
N. External Environment 70% 4 = 280
46
Total = 6857.5
47. 1-->14
P’ = ∑ Pp x Nc 100%
n 10000
Overall Safety Performance P’ = 68.57% (Acceptable level of
safety and the standard is good). This evaluation observation
checklist is considered to be the simplest way to assessed the
performance of safety components within an area with adequate
experience and having strong knowledge background in fire safety.
47
48. Performances Assessment
Zero, 0 = The component is not available . Survey Grade:
1 2 3 4 5
Worst Bad Average Good Very Good
Percentages perceptions:
below 30% to 41% to 61% to 81% to
30% 40% 60% 80% 100%
High Average Less
Threat Threat Threat
High Risk Medium Low Risk
Risk
Low Medium High
Safety Safety Safety
Highly Vulnerability Less
Vulnerable Vulnerable
48
49. Conclusion
The fire safety policy and objectives has been considered by
the Delphi group members of various background and
qualifications. Yet, the outcome was really impressive in
terms of the agreement towards achieving the fire safety
policy for the educational establishment. It was agreed that
life safety as the main priority objectives in achieving the
policy and followed by educational continuity, property
protection, educational environment, public anxiety and
economy in sequence.
Also the formation of the checklist and appraisal technique
enable the evaluator and building manager to enhance the
quality of fire safety services installed within a building
according to the yearly budget allocated. And yet there is
no compromise about the level of safety required for the
sustainable of the building and the contents. 49
50. • The evaluation processes is very important to
carry out at earlier stage so that precautions
steps are established
- to cater for any unexpected fire
occurrence.
- a fire safety cost benefit can be
implemented with flexibility in design
- to overcome the problems of fire.
- fire safety of the building is kept to the
acceptable standard.
50
FIRE SAFETY Stages of Fire Building Construction Activities, Actions Safety Development Process & Requirements I Design & Approval - Assessment on Fire Safety,(Regs & Act) - Costing, - Performances - Maintainability - Reliability - Safety Plans & Supervision II Construction - Health and Safety on Site (workers and staff, visitors) - Layout Plan - Housekeeping and Material distribution on site - Security and Monitoring on site III Commissioning - Introducing new system if possible - Introduce Support System - Occupancies Responsibilities - Checking and Maintenance IV Accidental Coverage - Insurance for Recovery - Lifes & Properties - Structural Stability - Performance Assessment - Notify the Safety and Risk Factors - Loss Estimation V Improvement, - Rechecking the Regs, Rebuilding or & Acts, Maintenance Maintenance or - Layout, Boundary etc Alteration - Building Structural - Building Materials - Building Services - Building Environment Diagram 3.2: Fire Safety and Building Life Cycle
The scope of this study will be based on the data given by the building regulations stated in Uniform Building By-Laws 1984 of Malaysian Government. The whole process will determined the level of performance of each system suggested by the regulations, design and the requirements of fire safety for educational buildings. This is important to most parties involved in decisions making regarding life and property safety of particular building's function. The purpose also goes to the improvement of educational buildings for children in Malaysia according to their comfort needs in future by comparing with the existing standard buildings. Therefore, the level of fire safety in buildings will also need to be improved and careful study will assist the designer or owner in terms of costing capabilities within the options available to them. There is also an effort to distinguish the importance of certain performance in terms of the regulatory context. QUESTIONS:- a). Is the Regulations/Act adequate for the designer teams to perform or complete their task on fire safety for any construction project before and after commissionning? b). Are the regulations easy to understand and to use by the professional and non-professional in order to tackle the fire problems? c). How good are the existing regulations? d). Which fire risk assessment is considered to be better in term of simplicity and accuracy? e). Do we really need to upgrade the building condition and perhaps the building requirements as well? f). Do the educational establishments really need to be safe from the danger of fire? In order to analyse the content of the Building By-Laws for the assessment purpose, 9 major groups has been identified in the document. They are as follows:- 1/ Building Regulations/Acts 2/ Decisions Organisation 3/ Buildings Categories/Occupancy 4/ Buildings Spaces and Areas 5/ Building Services and Maintenance 6/ Materials for Construction 7/ Building Structure Components 8/ Environmental Systems 9/ Aspects of Fire Safety
Other Considerations:- Structure of the Organization It’s functions Problems Identification Current and Future Needs Methods of Evaluation-Performances Base. Examples of Problems Identification:- School Cultural involved: leadership, working capability, communication and interaction, classroom, learning and teaching and etc. Ministry of Education also suggested that schools can be improved by several aspect:- a. Teachers' who create a positive and healthy school culture. b. Creating positive school and classroom environment. c. Good and healthy interaction and communication. d. Involvement of the community and parents. e. Improve students' potentials in everything. f. Provide positive ways of living. g. Produce a responsible and honour student. The steps to improve the school performance and prestage:- 1. Physical Infra-structure/ tidy and cleanliness/ safety/ provision/ comfort and beauty of the school which can actract students to school or being within the school. 2. Teachers' expertise/ organisational cultural / parents' and society involvement which these will create the positive and healthy environment. Then these will lead to general decision making / commitment/ good communication and sincerity plus highly morality. 3. Harmony environment can be created by having good understanding between teachers and students and headmaster/ feel free to proceed with their resposibilities / having high and respective moral/ open communication/ orientation working procedure/ highly motivated and understanding. Other considerations:-( Saaid Majid, Berita Harian: 7/6/91) 1. Physical aspect -->a. Comfort b. Beauty c. Facilities 2. Social aspect 3. Knowledge cultural aspect
There is interdependency between knowledge and know –how , therefore a training program or course may need to be conducted to the new inexperience professional or officers.
Delphi is also used to generate useful guidance in those areas where no quantitative data derived from experiment, survey or because experience is not available (Marchant, 1998). The purposes of the Delphi Group are to produce a framework as follows: 1.To distil a general perception from people of different backgrounds. To represent a point of view of the public. To help local authorities or the government in setting a policy for existing and future developments. 4.To assist the local authority in the implementation of the law and regulations related to building construction. 5.To convince the user or building owner about the importance of fire safety systems in buildings and it’s surrounding environment plus budget allocation. 6.To setting up a system of priority for the building development. 7.Using as a tool for decision making by the professionals in fire safety engineering. Application 1.Chemical Industry 2.Health Care Building 3.Development of an atomic capability as part of defense scheme 4.Future economic development in the USA 5.Fire Safety evaluation of Dwellings
The three essential features of the Delphi procedures (Dalkey 1969) applied to most Delphi technique are: - 1. Anonymit y - This was affected by the use of questionnaires or other formal communication channels thereby reducing the impact/effect of dominant individuals; The questionnaire was carefully designed to form a standardized output from the group. 2. Controlled feedback - This is achieved by conducting the exercise in a series of rounds between which a summary of the results of the previous round is communicated to the participants; Explanation of the previous results from the respondents was circulated, before the next set of questionnaires was given out to the panel. 3 . Statistical group response - This is a device to assure that the opinion of every member of the group is represented in the final response. It is also a method of reducing group pressure for conformity. The process of answering the questionnaire was being conducted in a meeting room and being supervised such as in an examination situation. With this in mind, the reliability of the Delphi techniques and methodology has been maintained throughout the studies.
The approaches to the members of the Delphi Group were as follows: - i. Confirming the selected members for the Delphi Group. ii. Set up the meetings venue and dates. iii. Invitation letter for each meeting. iv. Set up the questionnaire and topics for discussion in parts based on the number of meetings to be held. v. Incentive and appreciation for their contribution of time and knowledge and to thank them for the support. Meetings Methodology The discussion was also conducted with initial explanation of the meeting purpose(s) and handing out only the particular set of questionnaires. They were told not to discuss amongst themselves and the feedback was collected before the meeting dismissed. And, before the next meeting is carried out, an explanation of the previous meeting results was taken place.
Questions to be Asked: Why is it important to carry out the discussion? Is there any significant importance that the organization chosen for the task is the priority concern? Importance scale is given as: 0 = Not applicable 1= Not important 2 = Quite important 3 = Important 4 = Very important 5 = Essential and Loss Impact scale is given as: 0 = Not applicable 1 = Trivial 2 = Nuisance 3 = Important 4 = Significant 5 = Disruptive 6 = Severe 7 = Catastrophic Scaling number is given to assist the Delphi group members in assessing the priority of the fire safety contributions. In the loss impact study for schools, two major variable need to be combined (1):- 1. The relative loss potential in the context of the operation of the school, and 2. The relevant geographical area. The combination of the two variables are take into consideration several other factors such as the human or occupants and the properties which contribute towards the continuity of the educational mission. The surrounding environment involving the buildings, community, local development and national and international relationship are also amongst the factors. 5.6.1 Relative Loss Potential (the result or effect of loss manifest) Most of the outcome will be used in looking at the importance of areas within the same system which only affecting the operation of the occupants. The loss impact measures that has been chosen are divided into 7 categories: a) TRIVIAL Causes slight changes in a particular area or room such as no breakdown in the operation of the school probably by a quick replacement. (i.e.: A fire in the rubbish bin. The particular group missed out one period of class, about half an hour) b) NUISANCE Causes minimal changes which affect only a specific room or area in such a way as to have minor effects on the operation of the school. (i.e.: Change of the writing board and probably the involved group missed classes for half a day.) c) IMPORTANT Causes changes which have a significant effect on a particular area or room of the school.(i.e.: One or two areas become dual function such as moving out of a classroom into a library or a laboratory. The original area is not available for a day, or more, for only the particular group) d) SIGNIFICANT Causes changes to the operation of the areas within the school. (i.e.: More classes have to moved out or change places/locations. Some of the school activities have to be cancelled but not involving the academic sessions or classes. Probably most of the laboratories, assembly hall, gymnasium and library might be used as classrooms. Those areas will be used only during particular time of the day and the main mission of certain areas still can be carried out. Dual mission temporarily.) e) DISRUPTIVE Causes changes to the mission of the areas, permanently.(i.e.: Using non-academic building such as gymnasium or accommodation and dining hall for the academic purposes. Some academic classes and activities have to be cancelled.) f) SEVERE Causes closure of the students and staffs spaces for a week or so and probably some students and staff will have to be given holiday until being informed. Building up several temporary buildings to be used particularly by those who will be facing major examinations in case there is no other alternative or other school as replacement. g) CATASTROPHIC No School. (i.e.: The whole school operation is at halt for more than a month or so.) Note: The descriptors for such outcomes can be supported by the &quot;power&quot; of the catchment area of interest.
In order to address the fire problems within educational establishment buildings, a collective measures in terms of fire safety and the types of buildings will need to be established. Are the schools really safe? The fire safety interest is creating a fire free environment inside and outside the building and the objectives must related to the issues. The Ministry of Education has set the National Educational Policy or Goals as a whole are aimed: - i. To Achieve National Unity ii. To Produce Quality Manpower Requirements for National Development iii. To Achieve Democratisation of Education iv. To Inculcate Positive Values. Therefore, the policy set for educational establishment in fire safety perspective can be “Fire Free Educational Environment” which is related to inculcate positive values as one of the main educational goals. Secondly, the objectives for free fire educational establishment can be of life safety, property protection, educational continuity and environment, public anxiety and economic. Priority will be the lives of the entire occupant within the educational establishment and also the one that can be affected outside the school boundary in case of fire disaster. Thirdly, the design for the courses of action may well be the following example: - a. Establishing the level of awareness among the occupants of the educational buildings. b. Comply the current situation of fire safety within the school with the requirement of the Building Regulation or Fire Precaution Act 1971 and other building codes. c. Establishing the “Norm” of fire safety requirement. d. Check List and Fire Technology e. Fire Safety and Fire Risk Assessment (Safety and Risk factors) Lastly, choose the methodology of assessing so that the outcome is repeatable and it can be standardized. For example using questionnaires for the probabilistic evaluation or using experimental work to determine the uncertainties and even Delphi Group can be used for professional judgment or opinion evaluation. Therefore, the checklist should be set as critical as possible to the level of being able to get the information required for the assessment purposes. This is the reason “why” a decision maker need to be accommodate with comprehensive background knowledge i.e. fire safety to be applied in the assessment of the policy and objectives check list.
The National Educational Policyas a whole can be explained in two parts (A) and (B):- A) The National Educational Goals which are aimed (3) :- I. To Achieve National Unity. II. To Produce Quality Manpower Requirements For National Development. III. To Achieve Democratisation of Education. IV. To Inculcate Positive Values. It has been long that the objective of the Ministry of Education to see that all the public; regardless of their background, beliefs and well being to have an adequate education to ensure that educational democracy in Malaysia can be achieved. Among the objectives to achieve are:- i. Increase the level of knowledge to the stage that the new generation will be able to cater all the possibilities that the future might need. ii. Excellence not only in academic but also in moral issues and mental attitudes. iii. To establish a sense of community. B) The National Educational Philosophy It is quoted by the Ministry of Education(3) that,: “ Education in Malaysia is an on-going effort towards the further development of the potential of individuals in a holistic and integrated manner, so as to produce individuals who are intellectually, spiritually, emotionally and physically balanced and harmonious, based on a firm belief in and devotion to GOD. Such an effort is designed to produce Malaysian citizens who are knowledgeable and competent, who possess high moral standards, and who are responsible and capable of achieving high level of personal well-being as well as being able to contribute to the harmony and betterment of the family, the society and the nation at large.” It seems that the safety of the educational buildings are amongst the main contribution towards realization of the National Education Policy. All started from a safe place or building with provision of security, better environment for education continuity plus a good services that can lead us to the achievement of the National Education Goals. The Government have to ensure that every individual is safe and given all their basic education needs and even comfort to educate them successfully. An assessment of the education curriculum is also important to be considered but the facilities and buildings also should be protected and prevented from any danger or risk partucularly fire and well equipped with the provision required. Since the requirement of fire safety for students must be fulfilled to a level of satisfaction and to a specific comfort, there are many things that the Government needs to consider such as the future expectation in educational system, development of the educational buildings, the facilities, comfort and the acceptability level of safety standards must be established.
To Inculcate Positive Value is one of the Malaysian National Educational Policy
Look at the tables and graphs. Capability to escape based on aged, maturity Capability to handle emergency scenario Training provision Fire drill exposure Building Structure – fire resistance, vertical and horizontal movement Disabled facilities Occupant Characteristics- Ability to Egress
Those are among the consideration of items breakdown for achieving Property Protection Objectives. The overall impact of Property Loss with the Continuation of the school educational system is considered to be very serious. There will be a different level of loss impact on the continuation of education depending on the severity and location of the fire within the educational establishment.
The relationships between the educational environments required for the particular areas within the school buildings are very important in order to achieve the maximum performance of the students. The results of the discussion and perceptions can be used by professionals and designers, particularly the architects and government authorities, as reference and decision making in the overall design of school buildings. For example the total number given to each area by the summation of agreement of the Delphi members, can be used as a rank of priority when dealing with the environmental requirement.
In many cases, public anxiety could contribute to the implementation of the government Act and Policy for fire safety standards.
Construction Economics is considered to be very important in all aspects of fire safety. Good management and wise spending will also assist in reducing the extras, or the over spending cost, on fire safety systems. It should be possible to incur minimum cost for the required level of fire safety.