SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 51
Assessing Fire Safety Policy for
  Educational Establishment


 MOHD FADZIL MOHD IDRIS(Ph.D)



  Faculty of Manufacturing & Technology Management,
                UMP, Kuantan Pahang.
                                                      1
Introduction
   BUILDING ASSESSMENT        O
                              B
BUILDING        ARCHITECT     J
PROGRESS        ENGINEERS     E
                                  P
                              C
                QUANTITY          O
                              T
PROFESSIONALS   SURVEYORS         L
                              I
                CONTRACTORS       I
                              V
                                  C
LOCAL           BUILDING      E
                                  Y
AUTHORITY       OWNER         S
                              O       2
FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
                              R
Fire Safety and Building Life
          Cycle (Building Process)
•   Design & Approval
•   Construction
•   Commissioning
•   Accidental Coverage /Recovery
•   Improvement, Rebuilding,
    Maintenance, Alteration
                                     3
•   Stages of Fire                     Building Construction     Activities, Actions
    Safety Development                 Process                   & Requirements
           I                           Design & Approval     -   Assessment on Fire
                                                                 Safety,(Regs & Act)
                                                             -   Costing,
                                                             -   Performances
                                                             -   Maintainability
                                                             -   Reliability
                                                             -   Safety Plans & Supervision

•          II                          Construction          -   Health and Safety on Site
                                                                 (workers and staff, visitors)
                                                             -   Layout Plan
                                                             -   Housekeeping and Material
                                                                 distribution on site
                                                             -   Security and Monitoring on site

•          III                         Commissioning         -   Introducing new system if possible
                                                             -   Introduce Support System
                                                             -   Occupancies Responsibilities
                                                             -   Checking and Maintenance

•          IV                          Accidental Coverage   -   Insurance for Recovery Lifes &
                                                                 Properties
                                                             -   Structural Stability
                                                             -   Performance Assessment
                                                             -   Notify the Safety and Risk Factors
                                                             -   Loss Estimation
•
           V                           Improvement,          -   Rechecking the Regs, & Acts,
                                       Rebuilding or         -   Layout, Boundary etc
                                       Maintenance or        -   Building Structural
                                       Alteration or         -   Building Materials
                                       Maintenance           -   Building Services
                                                             -   Building Environment
       Diagram 1.0: Fire Safety and Building Life Cycle
Fire Safety In Buildings
   •   Building Selection
   •   Building Purpose
   •   Building Design
   •   Selection of Materials
   •   Layout and Planning
   •   Construction
   •   Commissioning and
   •   Maintenance
   •   Regulations, Codes and Standards, Cost.   5
FIRE SAFETY GENERAL
   REQUIREMENTS
FACTORS TO BE
             CONSIDERD
• LEGAL REQUIREMENTS AND INDUSTRIAL DEMAND
  – FIRE ACT 1988
  – UNIFORM BUILDING BY LAW (UBBL)1984
  – OSH ACT 1997
• ORGANIZATION’S POLICY
  – SAFETY FOR ALL & BENEFITS COME ALONG
• SUSTAINABILITY
  –   BUSINESS PROJECTIONS
  –   CONTINUITY
  –   PROFITS
  –   SAVINGS
  –   PROSPEROUS
  –   REPUTATION
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS
• Fire Service Act 1988:
  – Part V (28)(1): Every designated premises
    shall require a fire certificate.
  – Part V (28)(2): Fire Certificate shall be
    renewable annually.
  – Part V (28)(3): Subsection(1) shall not apply
    to premises appropriated to, and used solely or
    mainly for ,public religious worship, or
    premises consisting of or comprised in a house
    that is occupied as a single private dwelling.
Fire Service Act 1988
• Part V (33): Where there is no fire
  certificate in force in respect of any
  designated premises the owner of the
  premises shall be guilty of an offence.
• Part V (35)(5): fine <RM 10,000 or < 5 yrs
  imprisonment for a term or both and shall
  liable to further fine of RM 1000 each day
  during which the offence is continued after
  the conviction.
Uniform Building By Law 1984
• No person shall occupy or permit to be
  occupied any building or any part thereof
  unless a certificate of fitness for occupation, a
  partial certificate of fitness for occupation or a
  temporary certificate of fitness for occupation
  has been issued under these By-laws for such
  building and any failure to comply with this
  by-law shall render such person liable to
  prosecution under the Act.
  (Act means the Street, Drainage and Building
  Act 1974)
Objectives of OSH Act 1994

 To secure safety & health of persons at
  work
 To protect other persons at the place of

  work
 To promote appropriate and suitable

  environment for persons at work
 To promote use of industry codes of

  practice
Application of OSHA ‘94
   Manufacturing
   Mining and Quarrying          Finance, Insurance
   Construction                   Real Estate
   Agriculture, Forestry &
    Fishing                       Public Services &
   Transport, Storage &           Statutory Authorities
    Communication
   Wholesale & Retail Trade
   Hotels & Restaurants       Except:
   Utilities
     – Electricity                 onboard ships &
     – Gas
                                   armed forces
     – Water
     – Sanitary Services
Making Decision
• WHY? – Needs, uncertainties in construction
  fields / building organization
  i.e: Fire Safety Policy & Objectives
       for Educational Establishment
- to reach a satisfactory level of safety
- to give good value for money
- to sustain its continuation of mission,
- benefits and priority for the future development.
- to fulfill the legal requirement
                                                 13
Decision Making Process
Experience     Primary data      Document Analysis
                                 Statistics Dept.
Survey                           News
Questionnaire Know-how           Reports
                 and
               Knowledge         Building
Experimentation                  Regulations
                                & Legislations
             Professional Judgment
                                                    14
Definition
Knowledge
- The nature of desired outcomes
Know –How
- The Course of action which will ensure the
  achievement of the desired outcomes
Delphi
- The susceptible of two interpretation or more
  meaning, ambiguous, of doubtful meaning,
  equivocal, obscure or uncertain position or
  classification
                                                  15
Why Delphi Technique?
• To discuss the uncertainty of several factors
• To obtain a group consensus on a forecast.
• To be able to assess policy or objectives (In this
  case Fire Safety In Educational Estb.)

• “Delphi may be characterized a s a method for
  structuring a group communication process so that
  the process is effective in allowing a group of
  individuals as a whole, to deal with a complex
  problem”.(Linstone and Turoff)
                                                       16
Delphi Technique:
Approach & Procedure
• Anonymity (freedom from
  identification or state of being
  noticed)
• Controlled feedback

• Statistical group response
                                17
Delphi Approaches

•   Selection of Members
•   Meetings (Venue & Dates)
•   Invitation letter
•   Set Topic & Questionnaires
•   Incentive and Appreciation

                                 18
Professional Judgment
• Loss Impact
  ( Individual, Community, District,
  National or International level)
• Priorities/Importance
• Using Scaling Number

                                       19
4 Major Elements
          ( Solving Problems)

• Prioritization of Issues
• Setting up Objectives
• Design suitable courses of
  action
• Method to assess or evaluate

                                 20
WHAT IS A POLICY?
• A policy is a deliberate plan of action to guide decisions and
  achieve rational outcome(s). The term may apply to
  government, private sector organizations and groups, and
  individuals. Presidential executive orders,
  corporate privacy policies, and parliamentary
  rules of order are all examples of policy. Policy differs from
  rules or law. While law can compel or prohibit behaviors
  (e.g. a law requiring the payment of taxes on income) policy
  merely guides actions toward those that are most likely to
  achieve a desired outcome.
• Policy or policy study may also refer to the process of
  making important organizational decisions, including the
  identification of different alternatives such as programs or
  spending priorities, and choosing among them on the basis of
  the impact they will have. Policies can be understood as
  political, management, financial, and administrative
  mechanisms arranged to reach explicit goals.
When the term policy is used
It may also refer to:
• Official government policy (legislation or
   guidelines that govern how laws should be put
   into operation)
• Broad ideas and goals in political manifestos and
   pamphlets
• A company or organization's policy on a
   particular topic. For example, the equal
   opportunity policy of a company shows that the
   company aims to treat all its staff equally
Fire Safety Policy
i.e:-
• Fire Free Educational Environment

Fire Safety Objectives
i.e:-
•Human Life
•Property Protection
•Educational Continuity
•Educational Environment
•Public Anxiety
•Economy                              23
Assessing Fire Safety Policy
• To Inculcate Positive Values.
  i.e:-
- To Minimize the Level Of Risk
- To Maximize the Level of Safety
- To Create/Maintain the Educational
   Environment
- To Ensure the Adequacy of the Services and
   Infrastructure, etc.
- To set a Standard Fire Safety Evaluation
   Scheme                                    24
Assessing Fire Safety Objectives



                               25
Life Safety:Occupant

   -Maturity, Aged, Child
   -Ability to Escape/ Evacuate
   -Location
   -Physical Requirement or
    Building Provision
   -Human Resource
    Management, etc.              26
Property Protection
•   Within a Room
•   Within a Building
•   Outside Building
•   Portable or Fixed Appliances
•   Fire Engine &Fire Officers
•   Rescue Team
•   Building Materials etc.
                                   27
Educational Environment
 •   Environmental Temperature
 •   Good Views
 •   Air Circulation
 •   Mobility
 •   Good Odor
 •   Acoustics
 •   Sun Light
 •   Shading
 •   Number of occupants         28
Public Anxiety

•   The standard of fire safety
•   Allocation and management
•   Political and Moral Issues
•   Organizational Reputation


                                  29
Economy

•   Installation
•   Commission
•   Maintenance
•   Alteration


                       30
PURPOSE OF STUDY
 Providing guidelines to ensure the safety of the
  establishments from danger of fire.


 Formulating evaluation checklists consisting of
  numbers which is applicable to assess fire safety
  components

 Establishing the procedure to evaluate fire safety standard
  via the set objectives, tactics and components to achieve
  the fire safety policy
Source(s) of Ignition                    Percentage %
1/ Carelessness                               38.4
2/ Electrical Appliances                      25.6
3/ Not known                                  12.8
4/ Arson                                       9.3
5/ Smoking habit                               5.8
6/ Natural Disasters                           5.8
7/ Other specify                               2.3

Sources of fire safety knowledge         Percentages
General reading                              34.6 %
Mass media and friends                       17.7 %
Notices and sign system                      11.8 %
Rules and regulations                         9.9 %
Subjects taught in schools or colleges        8.1 %
Extra Co-curriculum activities                7.1 %
Assigned Responsibility                       4.8 %
Past Fire Accident(s)                         3.1 %
Other                                         1.5 %
Profession                                    1.3 %     32
Percentages %




                                     0.0
                                           10.0
                                                  20.0
                                                                    30.0
                                                                             40.0
                                                                                           50.0
                                                                                                  60.0
                                                                                                         70.0
                                                                                                                80.0



                      Classroom


                       Staffroom


                          Canteen

                  Laboratory/W
                     orkshop

                  Library/Resou
                     rce Centre

                        Computer
                          room




 Building Areas
                  Assembly Hall

                   Sport Centre/
                    Gymnasium

                      Store room
                                                                                                                       Types of Fire Threat within the Educational Premises




                  Hostel/Accom
                      odation

                       Dining hall
                                                                     Gases




33
                                                         Chemical
                                                                             Electricity
Ranking




                               0
                                   1
                                       2
                                           3
                                                 4
                                                          5
                                                              6
                                                                  7

                 Dormitory


                  Dining
                Hall/kitchen



              Room(Single)



                   Canteen



             Common Room




     Areas
              Utilities Room
                                                                                         Accomodation Building




               Store Room



               Warden Flat
                                                                      The Most Important Areas For Fire Safety System Within Hostel/




              Prayer Room
                                                Series1




34
Priority   Ranking         Less Priority




                             0
                                    2
                                        4
                                              6
                                                        8
                                                               10
                                                                        12
                                                                             14


              Laboratory

                    Hostel

               Workshop

        Computer centre

                 Canteen

               Dining Hall

        Resource Centre

                  Library




Areas
              Classroom

              Staff room

          Office/General
                                                                                     (Areas Within Educational Buildings)




                office
                                                                                  Rank of Vulnerability Towards Fire Hazards




             Lecture Hall

                  Tutorial

            Sport Centre

           Assembly hall
                                              Series1




35
Building Area    Percentage % Fire Safety Objective within
                              Educational Establishment and it’s
                              priority.
Classroom            33.5     Life / Mission / Property
Hostel               21.0     Life / Property
Library              12.4     Property / Cost - books, references,
                              equipment
Laboratory           10.3     Property / Environment or high hazard

Staffroom             6.5       Life / Mission or teaching references

Computer              3.9       Property / Cost or electrical items
General office        3.4       Property / Mission - records

Individual            2.8       Property or teaching or learning
office                          references
Studio                2.4       Property or combustible materials
Other                 2.2
Workshop              1.1       Property or High hazard area
Kitchen               0.6       Property or electrical and source of
                                ignition
The Areas Within Educational Establishment
               Which Are Very Important To Be Considered
                   For Fire Safety System Installation




              DINING
               HALL



             HOSTEL



              WORK
              SHOPS


              STAFF
              ROOM


           RESOURCE
            CENTRE
Areas




           COMPUTER
            CENTRE
                                                                                Series1

            LIBRARY




            CANTEEN



         GYMNASIUM/
        SPORT CENTRE



        LABORATORY



              CLASS
              ROOM/


                       0        1     2    3     4     5    6     7         8

                           Priority   Ranking from 1 to 8   Less Priority


                                                                                          37
EVALUATION PROCESS
          EVALUATION CONSIDERATION

Quantitative appraisal             Analysis


                DELPHI TECHNIQUE

 QUESTIONNAI                       QUESTIONNAI
 RE Involving
    1                              RE 2
                                    Professional
     building                        judgment
   occupants
                 POINT SCHEME
EVALUATION PROCESS
 The first fire safety    THE MAKING OF EVALUATION
evaluation scheme was       Establish the NORM
                           POINT SCHEME
developed for the patients
area in hospitals for       Establish the component of fire safety
Department of Health and
                            Formulating policy, objectives and tactics to
Social Services in June
1982                         achieve

 Development and            Setting up questionnaire for the Delphi Group
application of the scheme    Attributing contribution numbers or points scheme
is now concentrated on
educational establishment    for each fire safety components, tactics,
in Malaysia                  objectives and policy based on their inter-
                             relationships
                             Setting up the Evaluation/Assessment Checklist
                             Application of Checklist
WHY POINTS SCHEME?
(NUMERICAL ASSESSMENT)

 A convincing method for non-technical
professionals and authorities
 Evaluation based on acceptable level
 Evaluation on specific area of the building
will lead to overall numerical assessment of the
premise with regard to fire safety requirement
and performance
 Comparison between buildings of the same
group can facilitate authorities in decision
making process for current and future
development
FRAMEWORK INTERACTION POINTS
                 SCHEME
                    QUESTIONNAIRE
Explanatory Notes

               A guide to experts and
               respondents on limitation of the
Interaction    questionnaire
Boxes
               Boxes and arrows between levels
               of hierarchical framework
Contribution

               Numbers between 0 to 10 is given
               to represent a range of limitation
LEVEL OF QUESTIONNAIRE
HIERARCHICAL FRAMEWORK INTERACTION STAGES
  STEP
    1
          Policy Level

         STEP
           2     Objectives Level

                STEP
                  3      Practice Level

                       STEP
                         4      Component Level
OBJECTIVES VS POLICY
                          POLICY

OBJECTIVES              Average    Percentages

Life Safety               9.6         25%

Property Protection       7.0         18%

Education Continuity      6.9         18%

Education Environment     5.3         14%

Public Anxiety            5.0         13%

Economy                   5.3         14%
Rank Order of The Fire Safety
          Objectives
• In Achieving the          Fire Safety      Rank
  Policy              Life safety             1
• Based on Loss of    Educational Continuity  2
  Life
• Based on Concern    Property Protection    3
• Based on Priority   Educational            3
• Based on Loss       Environment
  Impact              Public Anxiety         4
                      Economy                5   44
NORM VALUES

COMPONENTS                        POINTS(%) V2%

A = BUILDING OCCUPANTS                8.26   8
B = PREPARED FOR FIRE EMERGENCY       9.12   9
C = FIRE PREVENTION                   9.63   9.5
D = INTERNAL ENVIRONMENT              7.64   7.5
E = SERVICES                          6.33   6
F = DETECTION                         8.16   8
G = COMMUNICATION AND ALARM           8.12   8
H = EGRESS OR ESCAPE                  5.33   5.5
I = FIRE FIGHTING                     6.87   7
J = PROTECTED AREAS                   5.92   6
K = AUTO SUPPRESSION                  6.89   7
L = SMOKE MOVEMENT CONTROL            6.64   7
M = BUILDING STRUCTURE                7.45   7.5
N = EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT              3.64   4_
                                             100
                                                   45
Building Type:                   A       B     C         D       E          F
Building Area:                   Sport halls   Percentages       Contribution
          Components                              (Pp)             Values(Nc)
    A.    Building Occupants                      90%        8 = 720
   B.     Preparedness For Fire Emergency        70%         9 =     630
   C.     Fire Prevention                        80%         9.5 =   760
   D.     Internal Environment                   80%         7.5=    600
   E.     Services                               80%         6 =     480
   F.     Detection System                       60%         8 =     480
   G.     Communication and Alarm                50%         8 =     400
   H.     Egress or Escape                       95%         5.5=    522.5
    I.    Fire Fighting                          50%         7 =     350
   J.     Protected Areas                        85%         6 =     510
   K.     Auto Suppression                        0          7 =      0
   L.     Smoke Movement/Control                 75%         7 =     525
   M.     Building Structure                     80%         7.5=    600
   N.     External Environment                   70%         4 =     280
                                                                                46
                                                 Total        = 6857.5
1-->14
                P’ =    ∑ Pp x Nc 100%
                         n 10000

  Overall Safety Performance P’ =      68.57% (Acceptable level of

safety and the standard is good). This evaluation observation
  checklist is considered to be the simplest way to assessed the
  performance of safety components within an area with adequate
  experience and having strong knowledge background in fire safety.




                                                                      47
Performances Assessment
     Zero, 0 = The component is not available . Survey Grade:
     1             2             3                 4                5

   Worst         Bad          Average             Good      Very Good

                       Percentages perceptions:
   below        30% to         41% to             61% to         81% to
    30%           40%            60%                80%           100%
   High                        Average                             Less
   Threat                       Threat                            Threat
 High Risk                    Medium                            Low Risk
                                Risk
    Low                       Medium                              High
   Safety                      Safety                            Safety
 Highly                     Vulnerability                         Less
Vulnerable                                                      Vulnerable

                                                                           48
Conclusion
The fire safety policy and objectives has been considered by
the Delphi group members of various background and
qualifications. Yet, the outcome was really impressive in
terms of the agreement towards achieving the fire safety
policy for the educational establishment. It was agreed that
life safety as the main priority objectives in achieving the
policy and followed by educational continuity, property
protection, educational environment, public anxiety and
economy in sequence.
Also the formation of the checklist and appraisal technique
enable the evaluator and building manager to enhance the
quality of fire safety services installed within a building
according to the yearly budget allocated. And yet there is
no compromise about the level of safety required for the
sustainable of the building and the contents.             49
• The evaluation processes is very important to
  carry out at earlier stage so that precautions
  steps are established
  - to cater for any unexpected fire
  occurrence.
  - a fire safety cost benefit can be
  implemented with flexibility in design
  - to overcome the problems of fire.
  - fire safety of the building is kept to the
      acceptable standard.
                                             50
Thank You




            51

More Related Content

Similar to Assessing educational policy and objectives (2)

EPC Services Capability Tra International limited
EPC Services Capability  Tra International limitedEPC Services Capability  Tra International limited
EPC Services Capability Tra International limitedHimanshu9974
 
Big Bear Package Details
Big Bear Package DetailsBig Bear Package Details
Big Bear Package DetailsCharles_Scholz
 
Information Security Audit Consultant
Information Security Audit  ConsultantInformation Security Audit  Consultant
Information Security Audit Consultantdcs HH
 
Company Profile Principio Eng July 10
Company Profile Principio Eng July 10Company Profile Principio Eng July 10
Company Profile Principio Eng July 10creymicolau
 
Hughitt brian
Hughitt brianHughitt brian
Hughitt brianNASAPMC
 
Innov8 Awareness Flyer Jul10 Artwork1
Innov8 Awareness Flyer   Jul10   Artwork1Innov8 Awareness Flyer   Jul10   Artwork1
Innov8 Awareness Flyer Jul10 Artwork1Alan Robson
 
Update CV 01.08.15
Update CV 01.08.15Update CV 01.08.15
Update CV 01.08.15Edmar Reso
 
Ofg Consultores English
Ofg Consultores  EnglishOfg Consultores  English
Ofg Consultores Englishjjvidal
 
Regulatory Issues for setting up Wind power plant
Regulatory Issues for setting up Wind power plantRegulatory Issues for setting up Wind power plant
Regulatory Issues for setting up Wind power plantPresi
 
Corporate ppt
Corporate pptCorporate ppt
Corporate pptNilesh499
 
Westside case study 3 years without a recordable injury
Westside case study 3 years without a recordable injury Westside case study 3 years without a recordable injury
Westside case study 3 years without a recordable injury NSW Environment and Planning
 
asp_brochure_turnkey_security_project_management_english_2015_linkedin
asp_brochure_turnkey_security_project_management_english_2015_linkedinasp_brochure_turnkey_security_project_management_english_2015_linkedin
asp_brochure_turnkey_security_project_management_english_2015_linkedinMartin Quaife
 
asp_brochure_turnkey_security_project_management_english_2015_linkedin
asp_brochure_turnkey_security_project_management_english_2015_linkedinasp_brochure_turnkey_security_project_management_english_2015_linkedin
asp_brochure_turnkey_security_project_management_english_2015_linkedinStuart Thompson
 
Jayashankar doc
Jayashankar docJayashankar doc
Jayashankar docjsc1091
 
CDM 2015 awareness pack
CDM 2015 awareness packCDM 2015 awareness pack
CDM 2015 awareness packMatt Harrison
 

Similar to Assessing educational policy and objectives (2) (20)

EPC Services Capability Tra International limited
EPC Services Capability  Tra International limitedEPC Services Capability  Tra International limited
EPC Services Capability Tra International limited
 
Big Bear Package Details
Big Bear Package DetailsBig Bear Package Details
Big Bear Package Details
 
Solar Brochure
Solar BrochureSolar Brochure
Solar Brochure
 
Information Security Audit Consultant
Information Security Audit  ConsultantInformation Security Audit  Consultant
Information Security Audit Consultant
 
Company Profile Principio Eng July 10
Company Profile Principio Eng July 10Company Profile Principio Eng July 10
Company Profile Principio Eng July 10
 
Hughitt brian
Hughitt brianHughitt brian
Hughitt brian
 
Innov8 Awareness Flyer Jul10 Artwork1
Innov8 Awareness Flyer   Jul10   Artwork1Innov8 Awareness Flyer   Jul10   Artwork1
Innov8 Awareness Flyer Jul10 Artwork1
 
2009 Face Conference Energy Le Moine
2009 Face Conference Energy Le Moine2009 Face Conference Energy Le Moine
2009 Face Conference Energy Le Moine
 
Rakesh CV (4)
Rakesh CV (4)Rakesh CV (4)
Rakesh CV (4)
 
Update CV 01.08.15
Update CV 01.08.15Update CV 01.08.15
Update CV 01.08.15
 
Ofg Consultores English
Ofg Consultores  EnglishOfg Consultores  English
Ofg Consultores English
 
Regulatory Issues for setting up Wind power plant
Regulatory Issues for setting up Wind power plantRegulatory Issues for setting up Wind power plant
Regulatory Issues for setting up Wind power plant
 
Corporate ppt
Corporate pptCorporate ppt
Corporate ppt
 
Robert Wilson - CV 2015 A
Robert Wilson -  CV 2015 ARobert Wilson -  CV 2015 A
Robert Wilson - CV 2015 A
 
Westside case study 3 years without a recordable injury
Westside case study 3 years without a recordable injury Westside case study 3 years without a recordable injury
Westside case study 3 years without a recordable injury
 
Qs Approach To Project Cost
Qs Approach To Project CostQs Approach To Project Cost
Qs Approach To Project Cost
 
asp_brochure_turnkey_security_project_management_english_2015_linkedin
asp_brochure_turnkey_security_project_management_english_2015_linkedinasp_brochure_turnkey_security_project_management_english_2015_linkedin
asp_brochure_turnkey_security_project_management_english_2015_linkedin
 
asp_brochure_turnkey_security_project_management_english_2015_linkedin
asp_brochure_turnkey_security_project_management_english_2015_linkedinasp_brochure_turnkey_security_project_management_english_2015_linkedin
asp_brochure_turnkey_security_project_management_english_2015_linkedin
 
Jayashankar doc
Jayashankar docJayashankar doc
Jayashankar doc
 
CDM 2015 awareness pack
CDM 2015 awareness packCDM 2015 awareness pack
CDM 2015 awareness pack
 

Recently uploaded

IAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI Solutions
IAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI SolutionsIAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI Solutions
IAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI SolutionsEnterprise Knowledge
 
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone ProcessorsExploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processorsdebabhi2
 
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreter
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreterPresentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreter
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreternaman860154
 
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...apidays
 
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure serviceWhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure servicePooja Nehwal
 
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen Frames
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen FramesUnblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen Frames
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen FramesSinan KOZAK
 
Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed texts
Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed textsHandwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed texts
Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed textsMaria Levchenko
 
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)Gabriella Davis
 
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdf
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdfThe Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdf
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdfEnterprise Knowledge
 
Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...
Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...
Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...Neo4j
 
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...Miguel Araújo
 
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024The Digital Insurer
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking MenDelhi Call girls
 
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path MountBreaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path MountPuma Security, LLC
 
Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...
Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...
Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...Igalia
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Diplomatic Enclave Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Diplomatic Enclave Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Diplomatic Enclave Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Diplomatic Enclave Women Seeking MenDelhi Call girls
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking MenDelhi Call girls
 
Developing An App To Navigate The Roads of Brazil
Developing An App To Navigate The Roads of BrazilDeveloping An App To Navigate The Roads of Brazil
Developing An App To Navigate The Roads of BrazilV3cube
 
GenCyber Cyber Security Day Presentation
GenCyber Cyber Security Day PresentationGenCyber Cyber Security Day Presentation
GenCyber Cyber Security Day PresentationMichael W. Hawkins
 
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine KG and Vector search for enhanced R...
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine  KG and Vector search for  enhanced R...Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine  KG and Vector search for  enhanced R...
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine KG and Vector search for enhanced R...Neo4j
 

Recently uploaded (20)

IAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI Solutions
IAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI SolutionsIAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI Solutions
IAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI Solutions
 
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone ProcessorsExploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
 
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreter
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreterPresentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreter
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreter
 
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
 
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure serviceWhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp 9892124323 ✓Call Girls In Kalyan ( Mumbai ) secure service
 
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen Frames
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen FramesUnblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen Frames
Unblocking The Main Thread Solving ANRs and Frozen Frames
 
Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed texts
Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed textsHandwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed texts
Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed texts
 
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
 
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdf
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdfThe Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdf
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdf
 
Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...
Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...
Neo4j - How KGs are shaping the future of Generative AI at AWS Summit London ...
 
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
 
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Friends Colony Women Seeking Men
 
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path MountBreaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
 
Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...
Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...
Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Diplomatic Enclave Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Diplomatic Enclave Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Diplomatic Enclave Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Diplomatic Enclave Women Seeking Men
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
 
Developing An App To Navigate The Roads of Brazil
Developing An App To Navigate The Roads of BrazilDeveloping An App To Navigate The Roads of Brazil
Developing An App To Navigate The Roads of Brazil
 
GenCyber Cyber Security Day Presentation
GenCyber Cyber Security Day PresentationGenCyber Cyber Security Day Presentation
GenCyber Cyber Security Day Presentation
 
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine KG and Vector search for enhanced R...
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine  KG and Vector search for  enhanced R...Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine  KG and Vector search for  enhanced R...
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine KG and Vector search for enhanced R...
 

Assessing educational policy and objectives (2)

  • 1. Assessing Fire Safety Policy for Educational Establishment MOHD FADZIL MOHD IDRIS(Ph.D) Faculty of Manufacturing & Technology Management, UMP, Kuantan Pahang. 1
  • 2. Introduction BUILDING ASSESSMENT O B BUILDING ARCHITECT J PROGRESS ENGINEERS E P C QUANTITY O T PROFESSIONALS SURVEYORS L I CONTRACTORS I V C LOCAL BUILDING E Y AUTHORITY OWNER S O 2 FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT R
  • 3. Fire Safety and Building Life Cycle (Building Process) • Design & Approval • Construction • Commissioning • Accidental Coverage /Recovery • Improvement, Rebuilding, Maintenance, Alteration 3
  • 4. Stages of Fire Building Construction Activities, Actions Safety Development Process & Requirements I Design & Approval - Assessment on Fire Safety,(Regs & Act) - Costing, - Performances - Maintainability - Reliability - Safety Plans & Supervision • II Construction - Health and Safety on Site (workers and staff, visitors) - Layout Plan - Housekeeping and Material distribution on site - Security and Monitoring on site • III Commissioning - Introducing new system if possible - Introduce Support System - Occupancies Responsibilities - Checking and Maintenance • IV Accidental Coverage - Insurance for Recovery Lifes & Properties - Structural Stability - Performance Assessment - Notify the Safety and Risk Factors - Loss Estimation • V Improvement, - Rechecking the Regs, & Acts, Rebuilding or - Layout, Boundary etc Maintenance or - Building Structural Alteration or - Building Materials Maintenance - Building Services - Building Environment Diagram 1.0: Fire Safety and Building Life Cycle
  • 5. Fire Safety In Buildings • Building Selection • Building Purpose • Building Design • Selection of Materials • Layout and Planning • Construction • Commissioning and • Maintenance • Regulations, Codes and Standards, Cost. 5
  • 6. FIRE SAFETY GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
  • 7. FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERD • LEGAL REQUIREMENTS AND INDUSTRIAL DEMAND – FIRE ACT 1988 – UNIFORM BUILDING BY LAW (UBBL)1984 – OSH ACT 1997 • ORGANIZATION’S POLICY – SAFETY FOR ALL & BENEFITS COME ALONG • SUSTAINABILITY – BUSINESS PROJECTIONS – CONTINUITY – PROFITS – SAVINGS – PROSPEROUS – REPUTATION
  • 8. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS • Fire Service Act 1988: – Part V (28)(1): Every designated premises shall require a fire certificate. – Part V (28)(2): Fire Certificate shall be renewable annually. – Part V (28)(3): Subsection(1) shall not apply to premises appropriated to, and used solely or mainly for ,public religious worship, or premises consisting of or comprised in a house that is occupied as a single private dwelling.
  • 9. Fire Service Act 1988 • Part V (33): Where there is no fire certificate in force in respect of any designated premises the owner of the premises shall be guilty of an offence. • Part V (35)(5): fine <RM 10,000 or < 5 yrs imprisonment for a term or both and shall liable to further fine of RM 1000 each day during which the offence is continued after the conviction.
  • 10. Uniform Building By Law 1984 • No person shall occupy or permit to be occupied any building or any part thereof unless a certificate of fitness for occupation, a partial certificate of fitness for occupation or a temporary certificate of fitness for occupation has been issued under these By-laws for such building and any failure to comply with this by-law shall render such person liable to prosecution under the Act. (Act means the Street, Drainage and Building Act 1974)
  • 11. Objectives of OSH Act 1994  To secure safety & health of persons at work  To protect other persons at the place of work  To promote appropriate and suitable environment for persons at work  To promote use of industry codes of practice
  • 12. Application of OSHA ‘94  Manufacturing  Mining and Quarrying  Finance, Insurance  Construction Real Estate  Agriculture, Forestry & Fishing  Public Services &  Transport, Storage & Statutory Authorities Communication  Wholesale & Retail Trade  Hotels & Restaurants Except:  Utilities – Electricity onboard ships & – Gas armed forces – Water – Sanitary Services
  • 13. Making Decision • WHY? – Needs, uncertainties in construction fields / building organization i.e: Fire Safety Policy & Objectives for Educational Establishment - to reach a satisfactory level of safety - to give good value for money - to sustain its continuation of mission, - benefits and priority for the future development. - to fulfill the legal requirement 13
  • 14. Decision Making Process Experience Primary data Document Analysis Statistics Dept. Survey News Questionnaire Know-how Reports and Knowledge Building Experimentation Regulations & Legislations Professional Judgment 14
  • 15. Definition Knowledge - The nature of desired outcomes Know –How - The Course of action which will ensure the achievement of the desired outcomes Delphi - The susceptible of two interpretation or more meaning, ambiguous, of doubtful meaning, equivocal, obscure or uncertain position or classification 15
  • 16. Why Delphi Technique? • To discuss the uncertainty of several factors • To obtain a group consensus on a forecast. • To be able to assess policy or objectives (In this case Fire Safety In Educational Estb.) • “Delphi may be characterized a s a method for structuring a group communication process so that the process is effective in allowing a group of individuals as a whole, to deal with a complex problem”.(Linstone and Turoff) 16
  • 17. Delphi Technique: Approach & Procedure • Anonymity (freedom from identification or state of being noticed) • Controlled feedback • Statistical group response 17
  • 18. Delphi Approaches • Selection of Members • Meetings (Venue & Dates) • Invitation letter • Set Topic & Questionnaires • Incentive and Appreciation 18
  • 19. Professional Judgment • Loss Impact ( Individual, Community, District, National or International level) • Priorities/Importance • Using Scaling Number 19
  • 20. 4 Major Elements ( Solving Problems) • Prioritization of Issues • Setting up Objectives • Design suitable courses of action • Method to assess or evaluate 20
  • 21. WHAT IS A POLICY? • A policy is a deliberate plan of action to guide decisions and achieve rational outcome(s). The term may apply to government, private sector organizations and groups, and individuals. Presidential executive orders, corporate privacy policies, and parliamentary rules of order are all examples of policy. Policy differs from rules or law. While law can compel or prohibit behaviors (e.g. a law requiring the payment of taxes on income) policy merely guides actions toward those that are most likely to achieve a desired outcome. • Policy or policy study may also refer to the process of making important organizational decisions, including the identification of different alternatives such as programs or spending priorities, and choosing among them on the basis of the impact they will have. Policies can be understood as political, management, financial, and administrative mechanisms arranged to reach explicit goals.
  • 22. When the term policy is used It may also refer to: • Official government policy (legislation or guidelines that govern how laws should be put into operation) • Broad ideas and goals in political manifestos and pamphlets • A company or organization's policy on a particular topic. For example, the equal opportunity policy of a company shows that the company aims to treat all its staff equally
  • 23. Fire Safety Policy i.e:- • Fire Free Educational Environment Fire Safety Objectives i.e:- •Human Life •Property Protection •Educational Continuity •Educational Environment •Public Anxiety •Economy 23
  • 24. Assessing Fire Safety Policy • To Inculcate Positive Values. i.e:- - To Minimize the Level Of Risk - To Maximize the Level of Safety - To Create/Maintain the Educational Environment - To Ensure the Adequacy of the Services and Infrastructure, etc. - To set a Standard Fire Safety Evaluation Scheme 24
  • 25. Assessing Fire Safety Objectives 25
  • 26. Life Safety:Occupant -Maturity, Aged, Child -Ability to Escape/ Evacuate -Location -Physical Requirement or Building Provision -Human Resource Management, etc. 26
  • 27. Property Protection • Within a Room • Within a Building • Outside Building • Portable or Fixed Appliances • Fire Engine &Fire Officers • Rescue Team • Building Materials etc. 27
  • 28. Educational Environment • Environmental Temperature • Good Views • Air Circulation • Mobility • Good Odor • Acoustics • Sun Light • Shading • Number of occupants 28
  • 29. Public Anxiety • The standard of fire safety • Allocation and management • Political and Moral Issues • Organizational Reputation 29
  • 30. Economy • Installation • Commission • Maintenance • Alteration 30
  • 31. PURPOSE OF STUDY  Providing guidelines to ensure the safety of the establishments from danger of fire.  Formulating evaluation checklists consisting of numbers which is applicable to assess fire safety components  Establishing the procedure to evaluate fire safety standard via the set objectives, tactics and components to achieve the fire safety policy
  • 32. Source(s) of Ignition Percentage % 1/ Carelessness 38.4 2/ Electrical Appliances 25.6 3/ Not known 12.8 4/ Arson 9.3 5/ Smoking habit 5.8 6/ Natural Disasters 5.8 7/ Other specify 2.3 Sources of fire safety knowledge Percentages General reading 34.6 % Mass media and friends 17.7 % Notices and sign system 11.8 % Rules and regulations 9.9 % Subjects taught in schools or colleges 8.1 % Extra Co-curriculum activities 7.1 % Assigned Responsibility 4.8 % Past Fire Accident(s) 3.1 % Other 1.5 % Profession 1.3 % 32
  • 33. Percentages % 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 Classroom Staffroom Canteen Laboratory/W orkshop Library/Resou rce Centre Computer room Building Areas Assembly Hall Sport Centre/ Gymnasium Store room Types of Fire Threat within the Educational Premises Hostel/Accom odation Dining hall Gases 33 Chemical Electricity
  • 34. Ranking 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Dormitory Dining Hall/kitchen Room(Single) Canteen Common Room Areas Utilities Room Accomodation Building Store Room Warden Flat The Most Important Areas For Fire Safety System Within Hostel/ Prayer Room Series1 34
  • 35. Priority Ranking Less Priority 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Laboratory Hostel Workshop Computer centre Canteen Dining Hall Resource Centre Library Areas Classroom Staff room Office/General (Areas Within Educational Buildings) office Rank of Vulnerability Towards Fire Hazards Lecture Hall Tutorial Sport Centre Assembly hall Series1 35
  • 36. Building Area Percentage % Fire Safety Objective within Educational Establishment and it’s priority. Classroom 33.5 Life / Mission / Property Hostel 21.0 Life / Property Library 12.4 Property / Cost - books, references, equipment Laboratory 10.3 Property / Environment or high hazard Staffroom 6.5 Life / Mission or teaching references Computer 3.9 Property / Cost or electrical items General office 3.4 Property / Mission - records Individual 2.8 Property or teaching or learning office references Studio 2.4 Property or combustible materials Other 2.2 Workshop 1.1 Property or High hazard area Kitchen 0.6 Property or electrical and source of ignition
  • 37. The Areas Within Educational Establishment Which Are Very Important To Be Considered For Fire Safety System Installation DINING HALL HOSTEL WORK SHOPS STAFF ROOM RESOURCE CENTRE Areas COMPUTER CENTRE Series1 LIBRARY CANTEEN GYMNASIUM/ SPORT CENTRE LABORATORY CLASS ROOM/ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Priority Ranking from 1 to 8 Less Priority 37
  • 38. EVALUATION PROCESS EVALUATION CONSIDERATION Quantitative appraisal Analysis DELPHI TECHNIQUE QUESTIONNAI QUESTIONNAI RE Involving 1 RE 2 Professional building judgment occupants POINT SCHEME
  • 39. EVALUATION PROCESS  The first fire safety THE MAKING OF EVALUATION evaluation scheme was  Establish the NORM POINT SCHEME developed for the patients area in hospitals for  Establish the component of fire safety Department of Health and  Formulating policy, objectives and tactics to Social Services in June 1982 achieve  Development and  Setting up questionnaire for the Delphi Group application of the scheme  Attributing contribution numbers or points scheme is now concentrated on educational establishment for each fire safety components, tactics, in Malaysia objectives and policy based on their inter- relationships  Setting up the Evaluation/Assessment Checklist  Application of Checklist
  • 40. WHY POINTS SCHEME? (NUMERICAL ASSESSMENT)  A convincing method for non-technical professionals and authorities  Evaluation based on acceptable level  Evaluation on specific area of the building will lead to overall numerical assessment of the premise with regard to fire safety requirement and performance  Comparison between buildings of the same group can facilitate authorities in decision making process for current and future development
  • 41. FRAMEWORK INTERACTION POINTS SCHEME QUESTIONNAIRE Explanatory Notes A guide to experts and respondents on limitation of the Interaction questionnaire Boxes Boxes and arrows between levels of hierarchical framework Contribution Numbers between 0 to 10 is given to represent a range of limitation
  • 42. LEVEL OF QUESTIONNAIRE HIERARCHICAL FRAMEWORK INTERACTION STAGES STEP 1 Policy Level STEP 2 Objectives Level STEP 3 Practice Level STEP 4 Component Level
  • 43. OBJECTIVES VS POLICY POLICY OBJECTIVES Average Percentages Life Safety 9.6 25% Property Protection 7.0 18% Education Continuity 6.9 18% Education Environment 5.3 14% Public Anxiety 5.0 13% Economy 5.3 14%
  • 44. Rank Order of The Fire Safety Objectives • In Achieving the Fire Safety Rank Policy Life safety 1 • Based on Loss of Educational Continuity 2 Life • Based on Concern Property Protection 3 • Based on Priority Educational 3 • Based on Loss Environment Impact Public Anxiety 4 Economy 5 44
  • 45. NORM VALUES COMPONENTS POINTS(%) V2% A = BUILDING OCCUPANTS 8.26 8 B = PREPARED FOR FIRE EMERGENCY 9.12 9 C = FIRE PREVENTION 9.63 9.5 D = INTERNAL ENVIRONMENT 7.64 7.5 E = SERVICES 6.33 6 F = DETECTION 8.16 8 G = COMMUNICATION AND ALARM 8.12 8 H = EGRESS OR ESCAPE 5.33 5.5 I = FIRE FIGHTING 6.87 7 J = PROTECTED AREAS 5.92 6 K = AUTO SUPPRESSION 6.89 7 L = SMOKE MOVEMENT CONTROL 6.64 7 M = BUILDING STRUCTURE 7.45 7.5 N = EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT 3.64 4_ 100 45
  • 46. Building Type: A B C D E F Building Area: Sport halls Percentages Contribution Components (Pp) Values(Nc) A. Building Occupants 90% 8 = 720 B. Preparedness For Fire Emergency 70% 9 = 630 C. Fire Prevention 80% 9.5 = 760 D. Internal Environment 80% 7.5= 600 E. Services 80% 6 = 480 F. Detection System 60% 8 = 480 G. Communication and Alarm 50% 8 = 400 H. Egress or Escape 95% 5.5= 522.5 I. Fire Fighting 50% 7 = 350 J. Protected Areas 85% 6 = 510 K. Auto Suppression 0 7 = 0 L. Smoke Movement/Control 75% 7 = 525 M. Building Structure 80% 7.5= 600 N. External Environment 70% 4 = 280 46 Total = 6857.5
  • 47. 1-->14 P’ = ∑ Pp x Nc 100% n 10000 Overall Safety Performance P’ = 68.57% (Acceptable level of safety and the standard is good). This evaluation observation checklist is considered to be the simplest way to assessed the performance of safety components within an area with adequate experience and having strong knowledge background in fire safety. 47
  • 48. Performances Assessment Zero, 0 = The component is not available . Survey Grade: 1 2 3 4 5 Worst Bad Average Good Very Good Percentages perceptions: below 30% to 41% to 61% to 81% to 30% 40% 60% 80% 100% High Average Less Threat Threat Threat High Risk Medium Low Risk Risk Low Medium High Safety Safety Safety Highly Vulnerability Less Vulnerable Vulnerable 48
  • 49. Conclusion The fire safety policy and objectives has been considered by the Delphi group members of various background and qualifications. Yet, the outcome was really impressive in terms of the agreement towards achieving the fire safety policy for the educational establishment. It was agreed that life safety as the main priority objectives in achieving the policy and followed by educational continuity, property protection, educational environment, public anxiety and economy in sequence. Also the formation of the checklist and appraisal technique enable the evaluator and building manager to enhance the quality of fire safety services installed within a building according to the yearly budget allocated. And yet there is no compromise about the level of safety required for the sustainable of the building and the contents. 49
  • 50. • The evaluation processes is very important to carry out at earlier stage so that precautions steps are established - to cater for any unexpected fire occurrence. - a fire safety cost benefit can be implemented with flexibility in design - to overcome the problems of fire. - fire safety of the building is kept to the acceptable standard. 50
  • 51. Thank You 51

Editor's Notes

  1.   FIRE SAFETY Stages of Fire Building Construction Activities, Actions Safety Development Process &amp; Requirements I Design &amp; Approval - Assessment on Fire Safety,(Regs &amp; Act) - Costing, - Performances - Maintainability - Reliability - Safety Plans &amp; Supervision   II Construction - Health and Safety on Site (workers and staff, visitors) - Layout Plan - Housekeeping and Material distribution on site - Security and Monitoring on site   III Commissioning - Introducing new system if possible - Introduce Support System - Occupancies Responsibilities - Checking and Maintenance   IV Accidental Coverage - Insurance for Recovery - Lifes &amp; Properties - Structural Stability - Performance Assessment - Notify the Safety and Risk Factors - Loss Estimation   V Improvement, - Rechecking the Regs, Rebuilding or &amp; Acts, Maintenance Maintenance or - Layout, Boundary etc Alteration - Building Structural - Building Materials - Building Services - Building Environment   Diagram 3.2: Fire Safety and Building Life Cycle
  2. The scope of this study will be based on the data given by the building regulations stated in Uniform Building By-Laws 1984 of Malaysian Government. The whole process will determined the level of performance of each system suggested by the regulations, design and the requirements of fire safety for educational buildings. This is important to most parties involved in decisions making regarding life and property safety of particular building&apos;s function. The purpose also goes to the improvement of educational buildings for children in Malaysia according to their comfort needs in future by comparing with the existing standard buildings. Therefore, the level of fire safety in buildings will also need to be improved and careful study will assist the designer or owner in terms of costing capabilities within the options available to them. There is also an effort to distinguish the importance of certain performance in terms of the regulatory context.   QUESTIONS:- a). Is the Regulations/Act adequate for the designer teams to perform or complete their task on fire safety for any construction project before and after commissionning? b). Are the regulations easy to understand and to use by the professional and non-professional in order to tackle the fire problems? c). How good are the existing regulations? d). Which fire risk assessment is considered to be better in term of simplicity and accuracy? e). Do we really need to upgrade the building condition and perhaps the building requirements as well? f). Do the educational establishments really need to be safe from the danger of fire?   In order to analyse the content of the Building By-Laws for the assessment purpose, 9 major groups has been identified in the document. They are as follows:- 1/ Building Regulations/Acts 2/ Decisions Organisation 3/ Buildings Categories/Occupancy 4/ Buildings Spaces and Areas 5/ Building Services and Maintenance 6/ Materials for Construction 7/ Building Structure Components 8/ Environmental Systems 9/ Aspects of Fire Safety
  3. Other Considerations:- Structure of the Organization It’s functions Problems Identification Current and Future Needs Methods of Evaluation-Performances Base. Examples of Problems Identification:- School Cultural involved: leadership, working capability, communication and interaction, classroom, learning and teaching and etc. Ministry of Education also suggested that schools can be improved by several aspect:- a. Teachers&apos; who create a positive and healthy school culture. b. Creating positive school and classroom environment. c. Good and healthy interaction and communication. d. Involvement of the community and parents. e. Improve students&apos; potentials in everything. f. Provide positive ways of living. g. Produce a responsible and honour student.   The steps to improve the school performance and prestage:- 1. Physical Infra-structure/ tidy and cleanliness/ safety/ provision/ comfort and beauty of the school which can actract students to school or being within the school. 2. Teachers&apos; expertise/ organisational cultural / parents&apos; and society involvement which these will create the positive and healthy environment. Then these will lead to general decision making / commitment/ good communication and sincerity plus highly morality. 3. Harmony environment can be created by having good understanding between teachers and students and headmaster/ feel free to proceed with their resposibilities / having high and respective moral/ open communication/ orientation working procedure/ highly motivated and understanding.   Other considerations:-( Saaid Majid, Berita Harian: 7/6/91) 1. Physical aspect --&gt;a. Comfort b. Beauty c. Facilities 2. Social aspect 3. Knowledge cultural aspect
  4. There is interdependency between knowledge and know –how , therefore a training program or course may need to be conducted to the new inexperience professional or officers.
  5. Delphi is also used to generate useful guidance in those areas where no quantitative data derived from experiment, survey or because experience is not available (Marchant, 1998). The purposes of the Delphi Group are to produce a framework as follows: 1.To distil a general perception from people of different backgrounds. To represent a point of view of the public. To help local authorities or the government in setting a policy for existing and future developments. 4.To assist the local authority in the implementation of the law and regulations related to building construction. 5.To convince the user or building owner about the importance of fire safety systems in buildings and it’s surrounding environment plus budget allocation. 6.To setting up a system of priority for the building development. 7.Using as a tool for decision making by the professionals in fire safety engineering. Application 1.Chemical Industry 2.Health Care Building 3.Development of an atomic capability as part of defense scheme 4.Future economic development in the USA 5.Fire Safety evaluation of Dwellings
  6. The three essential features of the Delphi procedures (Dalkey 1969) applied to most Delphi technique are: - 1. Anonymit y - This was affected by the use of questionnaires or other formal communication channels thereby reducing the impact/effect of dominant individuals; The questionnaire was carefully designed to form a standardized output from the group. 2. Controlled feedback - This is achieved by conducting the exercise in a series of rounds between which a summary of the results of the previous round is communicated to the participants; Explanation of the previous results from the respondents was circulated, before the next set of questionnaires was given out to the panel. 3 . Statistical group response - This is a device to assure that the opinion of every member of the group is represented in the final response. It is also a method of reducing group pressure for conformity. The process of answering the questionnaire was being conducted in a meeting room and being supervised such as in an examination situation. With this in mind, the reliability of the Delphi techniques and methodology has been maintained throughout the studies.
  7. The approaches to the members of the Delphi Group were as follows: - i. Confirming the selected members for the Delphi Group. ii. Set up the meetings venue and dates. iii. Invitation letter for each meeting. iv. Set up the questionnaire and topics for discussion in parts based on the number of meetings to be held. v. Incentive and appreciation for their contribution of time and knowledge and to thank them for the support. Meetings Methodology The discussion was also conducted with initial explanation of the meeting purpose(s) and handing out only the particular set of questionnaires. They were told not to discuss amongst themselves and the feedback was collected before the meeting dismissed. And, before the next meeting is carried out, an explanation of the previous meeting results was taken place.
  8. Questions to be Asked: Why is it important to carry out the discussion? Is there any significant importance that the organization chosen for the task is the priority concern? Importance scale is given as: 0 = Not applicable 1= Not important 2 = Quite important 3 = Important 4 = Very important 5 = Essential and Loss Impact scale is given as: 0 = Not applicable 1 = Trivial 2 = Nuisance 3 = Important 4 = Significant 5 = Disruptive 6 = Severe 7 = Catastrophic Scaling number is given to assist the Delphi group members in assessing the priority of the fire safety contributions. In the loss impact study for schools, two major variable need to be combined (1):-   1. The relative loss potential in the context of the operation of the school, and 2. The relevant geographical area.   The combination of the two variables are take into consideration several other factors such as the human or occupants and the properties which contribute towards the continuity of the educational mission. The surrounding environment involving the buildings, community, local development and national and international relationship are also amongst the factors.     5.6.1 Relative Loss Potential (the result or effect of loss manifest)     Most of the outcome will be used in looking at the importance of areas within the same system which only affecting the operation of the occupants. The loss impact measures that has been chosen are divided into 7 categories:   a) TRIVIAL Causes slight changes in a particular area or room such as no breakdown in the operation of the school probably by a quick replacement. (i.e.: A fire in the rubbish bin. The particular group missed out one period of class, about half an hour)   b) NUISANCE Causes minimal changes which affect only a specific room or area in such a way as to have minor effects on the operation of the school. (i.e.: Change of the writing board and probably the involved group missed classes for half a day.)   c) IMPORTANT Causes changes which have a significant effect on a particular area or room of the school.(i.e.: One or two areas become dual function such as moving out of a classroom into a library or a laboratory. The original area is not available for a day, or more, for only the particular group)   d) SIGNIFICANT Causes changes to the operation of the areas within the school. (i.e.: More classes have to moved out or change places/locations. Some of the school activities have to be cancelled but not involving the academic sessions or classes. Probably most of the laboratories, assembly hall, gymnasium and library might be used as classrooms. Those areas will be used only during particular time of the day and the main mission of certain areas still can be carried out. Dual mission temporarily.)   e) DISRUPTIVE Causes changes to the mission of the areas, permanently.(i.e.: Using non-academic building such as gymnasium or accommodation and dining hall for the academic purposes. Some academic classes and activities have to be cancelled.)   f) SEVERE Causes closure of the students and staffs spaces for a week or so and probably some students and staff will have to be given holiday until being informed. Building up several temporary buildings to be used particularly by those who will be facing major examinations in case there is no other alternative or other school as replacement.   g) CATASTROPHIC No School. (i.e.: The whole school operation is at halt for more than a month or so.)     Note: The descriptors for such outcomes can be supported by the &amp;quot;power&amp;quot; of the catchment area of interest.
  9. In order to address the fire problems within educational establishment buildings, a collective measures in terms of fire safety and the types of buildings will need to be established. Are the schools really safe? The fire safety interest is creating a fire free environment inside and outside the building and the objectives must related to the issues. The Ministry of Education has set the National Educational Policy or Goals as a whole are aimed: - i. To Achieve National Unity ii. To Produce Quality Manpower Requirements for National Development iii. To Achieve Democratisation of Education iv. To Inculcate Positive Values.   Therefore, the policy set for educational establishment in fire safety perspective can be “Fire Free Educational Environment” which is related to inculcate positive values as one of the main educational goals. Secondly, the objectives for free fire educational establishment can be of life safety, property protection, educational continuity and environment, public anxiety and economic. Priority will be the lives of the entire occupant within the educational establishment and also the one that can be affected outside the school boundary in case of fire disaster. Thirdly, the design for the courses of action may well be the following example: - a. Establishing the level of awareness among the occupants of the educational buildings. b. Comply the current situation of fire safety within the school with the requirement of the Building Regulation or Fire Precaution Act 1971 and other building codes. c. Establishing the “Norm” of fire safety requirement. d. Check List and Fire Technology e. Fire Safety and Fire Risk Assessment (Safety and Risk factors) Lastly, choose the methodology of assessing so that the outcome is repeatable and it can be standardized. For example using questionnaires for the probabilistic evaluation or using experimental work to determine the uncertainties and even Delphi Group can be used for professional judgment or opinion evaluation. Therefore, the checklist should be set as critical as possible to the level of being able to get the information required for the assessment purposes. This is the reason “why” a decision maker need to be accommodate with comprehensive background knowledge i.e. fire safety to be applied in the assessment of the policy and objectives check list.
  10. The National Educational Policyas a whole can be explained in two parts (A) and (B):- A) The National Educational Goals which are aimed (3) :- I. To Achieve National Unity. II. To Produce Quality Manpower Requirements For National Development. III. To Achieve Democratisation of Education. IV. To Inculcate Positive Values. It has been long that the objective of the Ministry of Education to see that all the public; regardless of their background, beliefs and well being to have an adequate education to ensure that educational democracy in Malaysia can be achieved. Among the objectives to achieve are:-   i. Increase the level of knowledge to the stage that the new generation will be able to cater all the possibilities that the future might need. ii. Excellence not only in academic but also in moral issues and mental attitudes. iii. To establish a sense of community.   B) The National Educational Philosophy   It is quoted by the Ministry of Education(3) that,:   “ Education in Malaysia is an on-going effort towards the further development of the potential of individuals in a holistic and integrated manner, so as to produce individuals who are intellectually, spiritually, emotionally and physically balanced and harmonious, based on a firm belief in and devotion to GOD. Such an effort is designed to produce Malaysian citizens who are knowledgeable and competent, who possess high moral standards, and who are responsible and capable of achieving high level of personal well-being as well as being able to contribute to the harmony and betterment of the family, the society and the nation at large.”   It seems that the safety of the educational buildings are amongst the main contribution towards realization of the National Education Policy. All started from a safe place or building with provision of security, better environment for education continuity plus a good services that can lead us to the achievement of the National Education Goals. The Government have to ensure that every individual is safe and given all their basic education needs and even comfort to educate them successfully. An assessment of the education curriculum is also important to be considered but the facilities and buildings also should be protected and prevented from any danger or risk partucularly fire and well equipped with the provision required. Since the requirement of fire safety for students must be fulfilled to a level of satisfaction and to a specific comfort, there are many things that the Government needs to consider such as the future expectation in educational system, development of the educational buildings, the facilities, comfort and the acceptability level of safety standards must be established.
  11. To Inculcate Positive Value is one of the Malaysian National Educational Policy
  12. Look at the tables and graphs. Capability to escape based on aged, maturity Capability to handle emergency scenario Training provision Fire drill exposure Building Structure – fire resistance, vertical and horizontal movement Disabled facilities Occupant  Characteristics-  Ability to Egress
  13. Those are among the consideration of items breakdown for achieving Property Protection Objectives. The overall impact of Property Loss with the Continuation of the school educational system is considered to be very serious. There will be a different level of loss impact on the continuation of education depending on the severity and location of the fire within the educational establishment.
  14. The relationships between the educational environments required for the particular areas within the school buildings are very important in order to achieve the maximum performance of the students. The results of the discussion and perceptions can be used by professionals and designers, particularly the architects and government authorities, as reference and decision making in the overall design of school buildings. For example the total number given to each area by the summation of agreement of the Delphi members, can be used as a rank of priority when dealing with the environmental requirement.
  15. In many cases, public anxiety could contribute to the implementation of the government Act and Policy for fire safety standards.
  16. Construction Economics is considered to be very important in all aspects of fire safety. Good management and wise spending will also assist in reducing the extras, or the over spending cost, on fire safety systems. It should be possible to incur minimum cost for the required level of fire safety.