1. PENGURUSAN KUALITI DALAM PENDIDIKAN / KAEDAH PENYELIDIKAN DALAM PENDIDIKAN
TUGASAN MENGKRITIK DAN MENILAI ARTIKEL JURNAL
1.TITLE
Is the title brief and informative?
Does the title make clear the population of interest and the major variables?
Have vague, ambiguous and emotion –laden terms been avoided?
2.STATEMENT OF PROBLEMS
Have the variables of interest been identified?
Has the theoretical foundation for the study been developed?
Is the problem clearly stated?
Is there justification or rational for the study?
3.RELATED LITERATURE
Is the related literature relevant and sufficient?
Are the connections between the present study and previous research and theory made clear?
4. HYPOTHESIS
Are the hypothesis explicit?
Do the hypothesis follow logically from the statement of the problem?
5.SUBJECTS
Is the population of interest defined?
Is the method for selecting the samples explicit?
Does the sampling allow for generalization to the population of interest?
6.PROCEDURES
Are the procedures described well enough to allow replication of the study?
Do the procedures include appropriate operational definition of the IV?
Do the procedures provide sufficient control for internal validity?
2. Do the procedures provide sufficient control for external validity?
7.INSTRUMENT
Is the information on the validity and reliability of the instrument provided?
Are the instrument adequately described?
Are the instruments appropriate operational definitions of the independent variables?
8.ANALYSIS OF THE DATA
Are the descriptive statistics used appropriate for summarizing the data?
Are the inferential statistics used appropriate for testing the hypothesis?
Have the statistics been interpreted appropriately?
Are the statistics appropriate for the level of measurement of the data?
9.RESULTS
Are the results of all hypothesis test presented?
Are the statistics interpreted correctly?
Are the result clearly presented?
Are tables and figures used approprietly?
10.DISCUSSION
Is there a clear interpretation of the results?
Does the author present implication of the study result?
Are the implications presented based on the result of the study, not on what the author hoped or
expected to be true?
Are appropriate applications discussed?
Do the applications follow logically from the results of the study?
Are the connections between the result and the theory and existing literatiure shown?
Are there suggestions for future research?
11. CONCLUSIONS
Are the conclusions clearly presented?
3. Do the conclusions follow logically form the result of the study?
Has the author avoided reaching conclusions that are not directly supported by the outcomes of the
study?
12. SUMMARY
Is the summary clear, concise and sufficiently complete?
Assoc Prof Dr Nek Kamal bin Yeop Yunus
University Pendidikan Sultan Idris
