Why Should It be Teaching in schools

1. Why Should It be Teaching in schools
There is considerable anecdotal evidence that students respond well in
subjects involving programming of robots.
Plenty of resources are available on the internet for parents and teachers,
for example, robot kits such as Lego Mindstorms and Vex Robotics, simple
programmable robots such as Sphero balls, and lesson plans. Sophisticated,
engaging robots such as the NAO robot are also available.
Robots lend themselves to do-it-yourself activities. For example, a
colleague builds robots using a 3D printer and uses his smart phone as
an interactive device to communicate with the printed robot.
Here are five reasons to teach robotics in schools:
1. Children find it fun
There are several competitions for a range of age groups that can channel
competitive instincts in a positive way. For example, asking children to
build a robot from a Lego set and then running a race to see which robot
goes fastest works well.
In my experience, the two most engaging ways of introducing IT in the
curriculum are robotics and computer game design.
2. Effective way of introducing programming to
students
Programming can be too abstract. By having to control a physical robot
and seeing what goes wrong, students learn what robots can and can’t do.
They also learn the need for precise instructions.
Robotics helps address the growing demand for teaching science,
technology, engineering and maths in schools. As well as exemplifying
technology directly by programming the robot, students also learn about

2. science, engineering and maths and get an understanding of how these
subjects link together.
3. Provides skills useful in future employment
There’s no doubt that there will be a need for people to be involved in
programming mechanical devices in the foreseeable future. The drone
industry has taken off. According to The Economist, more than 15,000
drones are being sold in the US each month.
By programming robots, students can discover if they have aptitude and
interest in a job market of the future.
4. Suitable for children with a range of abilities
There is [considerable
evidence](http://scazlab.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/annurev-b
ioeng-071811-150036(1) that robots are particularly suitable for
engaging with children on the autism spectrum. Children on the spectrum
respond to the calm, clear, consistent interactions that robots can
provide.
ASK NAO is a suite of games that have been developed for the NAO robots
to teach autistic children. Milo is a robot developed by US startup
Robokind to help autistic children. Repetition, predictability and clear
emotions work well.
5. Demystifies a complex technology
Many stories in the media concern robots – one of the most recent
focused on a report urging the United Nations to ban drones and “killer
robots”.
Another report by the Committee for Economic Development of Australia
warned that robots could replace 40% of Australian jobs by 2025 - which
equates to around 5 million jobs over the next two decades.