Your final exam paper will require you to answer 2 essay questions (each question between 5 to 6 pages), a total of 10 to 12 pages for both questions. You will be graded on the following: 1) COMPOSITION: grammar, syntax, spelling, organization 2) CONTENT: information & data 3) CREATIVITY: originality of approach and ideas 4) CRITICAL ANALYSIS: sociological imagination 5) CITATION: sources; references of each textbook, each film clip, email discussions/articles, class lectures/discussion, bibliography/works cited -page. In order to provide a critical analysis, in addition to sourcing your required readings, film clips, lectures, & class discussion posts, your paper should enliven your "historical and legal imagination" and incorporate the lectures and readings fully and extensively. When developing essays, please answer and address the questions in the assignment prompt, constructing a cogent, coherent essay supported with logic, reason & empirical evidence. Please note that these are two separate essays!!!! Your final exam paper will require you to answer 2 separate essay questions (each question between 5 to 6 pages), a total of 10 to 12 pages for both questions. Please upload in one document *but* make sure you indicate where one essay ends and the second one starts! 1. Hall vs. People of California (1854) 2. 1852 Foreign Miner's Tax 3. 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act 4. Yick Wo vs. Hopkins 1886 5. 1908 Gentleman's Agreement 6. Ozawa v. United States 1922 7. 1934 Tydings-McDuffy Act 8. Asiatic Barred Zone, 1917 9. Immigration Act of 1924 10. U.S. v. Bhagat Singh Thind (1923) 11. Korematsu v. United States, 1945 12. Executive Order 9066 13. Hirabayashi v. United States, 1943 14. Yasui v. United States, 1943 15. War Brides' Act of 1945 16. Cable Act of 1922 17. Roldan v. Los Angeles County, 1933 18. California Anti-Miscegenation Statue (1880's ~ 1948) 19. Walter-McCarren Act, 1952 20. Immigration Act of 1965 21. Amerasian Homecoming Act, 1980 22. Immigration Act of 1986 23. The Massie Case, 1932 (Honolulu, Hawaii) 24. The Myles Fukunaga Case, 1928 (Honolulu, Hawaii) 25. 1954 Brown v. Board of Education 26. 1982 Vincent Chin Case (Criminal Case, Civil Cases) *********FINAL EXAM QUESTIONS: 1) How have *race,* *the racialization process* and *the law* informed, affected, and defined the Asian American/Pacific Islander experiences and social identity in the United States? Explain how they have contributed to the racialization process of Asian Pacific Islander Americans and impacted their experiences and social positionality in the United States. Provide a sociohistorical context and explain their significant role in defining what it means to be an "Asian American" and more importantly, "American." Incorporate at least 3 laws or legal cases (from the list provided) to give examples. 2) Select and discuss 3 landmark legal cases (from the list above) that involve Asian Pacific Ameri.