Week 6: Creating Bibliographies and Practicing MLA Citation Revision Narrative Assignment Sheet and Rubric After feedback has been received from your peer group and course instructor, you are responsible for making appropriate changes and reflecting upon these changes from initial draft to final submitted draft. This assignment is reflective in nature and you are not expected to quote assigned reading or course content. Instead, think about the assignment holistically and trace your drafting stages from beginning to final product. Our personal identities and experiences affect how we view ourselves as writers, and we need a certain level of self-awareness as writers in order to recognize the power and control we have to guide how we compose texts. This Revision Narrative Worksheet should help you approach two outcomes: demonstrating motivated decision-making and revision throughout an ongoing process of composition and articulating connections between one’s identity and experiences and the rhetorical choices one makes. As you answer the questions on this worksheet, narrate how your awareness and decisions changed across the revision process for this project. Notes: • Be as specific as possible about the realizations and decisions you narrate, but don’t feel like you have to include every little thing you realized or did. • The “work on your own” category is where you can describe steps you took to revise beyond the required steps I ask you to complete. It could include additional exercises you did on your own outside of class, visits to academic resource centers, things you applied based on any readings, feedback you solicited from someone outside of class, etc. Either replace the “work on your own” box with a description of what you did or delete those rows if you’re not using them. • To successfully complete this Revision Narrative worksheet, your answers should do the following: o demonstrate the use of a variety of revision strategies o articulate the potential influence or consequences of one’s identity and experiences as the composer o reflect on the affective experiences of the composition process You do not need to integrate all of the suggested changes, but goal of this assignment is to get you thinking about the writing process at large and consider the steps you take when you revise your own composition. To receive full credit, review the assignment rubric below and complete the following revision narrative outline. Criteria Below Expectation (0-9) Meeting Expectations (10-17) Outstanding (18-25) Total Points Nuts and Bolts Did student fully complete the revision narrative template meeting a minimum total of 500 words? Did students submit in an acceptable word .doc or .docx format? Did student demonstrate strong close reading strategies and meaningfully integrate the suggestions provided from peer and instructor feedback? If feedback was not integr ...

1. Week 6: Creating Bibliographies and Practicing MLA Citation
Revision Narrative Assignment Sheet and Rubric
After feedback has been received from your peer group and
course instructor, you are
responsible for making appropriate changes and reflecting upon
these changes from initial draft to
final submitted draft. This assignment is reflective in nature and
you are not expected to quote
assigned reading or course content. Instead, think about the
assignment holistically and trace
your drafting stages from beginning to final product.
Our personal identities and experiences affect how we view
ourselves as writers, and we need a
certain level of self-awareness as writers in order to recognize
the power and control we have to
guide how we compose texts. This Revision Narrative
Worksheet should help you approach two
outcomes: demonstrating motivated decision-making and
revision throughout an ongoing process
of composition and articulating connections between one’s
identity and experiences and the
rhetorical choices one makes. As you answer the questions on
this worksheet, narrate how your
awareness and decisions changed across the revision process for

2. this project. Notes:
• Be as specific as possible about the realizations and decisions
you narrate, but don’t feel
like you have to include every little thing you realized or did.
• The “work on your own” category is where you can describe
steps you took to revise
beyond the required steps I ask you to complete. It could
include additional exercises you
did on your own outside of class, visits to academic resource
centers, things you applied
based on any readings, feedback you solicited from someone
outside of class, etc. Either
replace the “work on your own” box with a description of what
you did or delete those rows
if you’re not using them.
• To successfully complete this Revision Narrative worksheet,
your answers should do the
following:
o demonstrate the use of a variety of revision strategies
o articulate the potential influence or consequences of one’s
identity and experiences
as the composer
o reflect on the affective experiences of the composition process
You do not need to integrate all of the suggested changes, but
goal of this assignment is to get
you thinking about the writing process at large and consider the
steps you take when you revise

3. your own composition. To receive full credit, review the
assignment rubric below and complete the
following revision narrative outline.
Criteria
Below Expectation
(0-9)
Meeting Expectations
(10-17)
Outstanding
(18-25)
Total
Points
Nuts and Bolts
Did student fully complete the revision narrative template
meeting a minimum total of
500 words? Did students submit in an acceptable word .doc or
.docx format? Did
student demonstrate strong close reading strategies and

4. meaningfully integrate the
suggestions provided from peer and instructor feedback? If
feedback was not
integrated, did student discuss those choices?
While this assignment is based on completion, points will be
awarded based on the
breadth, quality, and completeness of your reflection.
__/ 25
Annotated Bibliography Revision Narrative
Audience
What were the biggest pieces
of feedback you received or
discoveries you made about
the writing at this point?
What did you do with that
feedback? How did you
revise your writing to

5. address what you learned at
this point?
Feedback from or
conversations with
instructor
Peer response process
Individual revision
process

6. 1. Do you think your local revisions or global revisions were
more impactful to
creating a better product? Why? In what ways?
2. Was there any significant feedback you received but chose to
disregard? Why? (For
instance, maybe someone gave you a suggestion for a big
change, but that
suggestion would’ve taken you further away from a goal you
were trying to achieve.)
3. If you could, what would you have done differently during
this writing process?
4. What challenged you during this writing process? How did
that make you feel, and
why? How did you respond?
5. What do you know about your own identity or experiences
that helps you
understand how this composition process went? How might this
reflection help you
in future writing situations?
6. What are you proud of from this writing process? How do
you feel now that it’s
over? Why do you think that is?

7. Project Planning
Do research on one-or-two large software systems that were
implemented successfully and on
one-or-two large software systems that failed in their
implementation. Write at least a 3-page
Word document, double-spaced, detailing each system.
Your paper should include a number of topic sections. Using
the concept of A.D.D.I.E., create a
section to discuss the A.-Analysis that went into the system, a
section to discuss the D.-Design of
the system, a section to discuss the D.-Development of the
system, a section to discuss the I.-
Implementation of the system (successful or failed) and a
section to discuss the E.-Evaluation of
the system (successful or failed). Provide the following:
1. An Introduction paragraph describing the assignment and a
short description of the
systems selected.
2. A section that describes the first Software System (with an
appropriate section Heading)
and a description of that Software System to include:
a. What is its purpose?

8. b. What operations it performs?
c. What are its inputs (resources, interfaces, when used)?
d. What are its outputs (interfaces, data)?
e. The system’s complexity/cost/feasibility.
f. Any constraints or risks found during the research.
3. Sections with details for each component of A.D.D.I.E. (with
an appropriate section
Heading) to include:
a. Success or failures identified.
b. Issues or findings identified.
c. Recommendations or lessons learned.
Your paper should then conclude with a Findings section the
compares the two systems. Provide
the following:
1. What made one system successful but make the other system
fail.
2. What could have been done to make the failed system more
successful.
3. What could have been done to make the successful system
even more successful.

9. You must include at least 3 scholarly references with citations.
Running head: short name of title 1
Short title of paper 4[ Enter Title of Paper here ]
[ Enter your name {Last, First} ]
Introduction
[Replace this Note with an Introduction. Do not include an
Abstract in this paper. The introduction should be
approximately one-or two paragraph of between 150 and 500
words.
The introduction needs to:
1. Summarize the details of the project and briefly describe the
important contents of your paper.
2. Define the following:
· the primary mission of the system to include any alternative or
secondary missions.
· the functions of the system.
· the type of equipment, personnel and other resources used for
the system.
· any changes or improvement that are anticipated as the system
grows and technology evolves.
· the environment where the system will operate.
3. Explain what Problem the system will address (i.e. what
makes a new system successful).
4. Introduce any other concepts or content specific to your
paper.]
Hypothesis
[Replace this Note with 1-or-more Hypothesis which is a
concise statement of what your research and analysis
discovered. As an example, “A successful system
implementation requires a robust testing plan”. Any Hypothesis
is developed after the research has been conducted. ]
Software System #1

10. [Remove this note and enter details about the Smart System
based on the topic details. Do the following for each Software
System and the elements of A.D.D.I.E.
· Complete research and evaluate the literature as it applies to
the topic.
· Analyze the research, especially noting where evidence from
multiple sources either confirm each other, conflict with each
other or supplement each other.
· Link this topic to the research question and hypothesis as well
as the next main topic.
This topic may include many paragraphs. Paragraphs should
consist of 5 to 8 sentences.]
Analysis
[Remove this note and complete this for the software system
found in your research.]
Design
[Remove this note and complete this for the software system
found in your research.]
Development
[Remove this note and complete this for the software system
found in your research.]
Implementation
[Remove this note and complete this for the software system
found in your research.]

11. Evaluation
[Remove this note and complete this for the software system
found in your research.]
Findings
[Remove this note. Summarize what was discovered in the
literature review and topic areas of this paper. The findings
may include many paragraphs but will not necessarily be of
significant length.]
References
Last Name, F. M. (Year). Article Title. Journal Title, Pages
From - To.
Last Name, F. M. (Year). Book Title. City Name: Publisher
Name.
Note: References are in Alphabetic order by last name. I highly
recommend that you use the Reference Tab in WORD to create
References and then Cite these references and add the
Bibliography/Reference page at the end of the document.
1. Click Manage Sources, click New and enter details for each
reference. Make sure the Style is set to APA before creating a
new reference.
2. Find each area with your paper where you want to cite a
reference and Click Insert Citation to choose the reference.
3. Create a blank page at the end of your paper and Click
Bibliography and Click Insert Bibliography.
Annotated Bibliography Revision Narrative
Audience

12. What were the biggest pieces of feedback you received or
discoveries you made about the writing at this point?
What did you do with that feedback? How did you revise your
writing to address what you learned at this point?
Feedback from or conversations with instructor
Peer response process
Individual revision process
1. Do you think your local revisions or global revisions were
more impactful to creating a better product? Why? In what
ways?
2. Was there any significant feedback you received but chose to

13. disregard? Why? (For instance, maybe someone gave you a
suggestion for a big change, but that suggestion would’ve taken
you further away from a goal you were trying to achieve.)
3. If you could, what would you have done differently during
this writing process?
4. What challenged you during this writing process? How did
that make you feel, and why? How did you respond?
5. What do you know about your own identity or experiences
that helps you understand how this composition process went?
How might this reflection help you in future writing situations?
6. What are you proud of from this writing process? How do
you feel now that it’s over? Why do you think that is?