Locavore Movement Gains Support

Locavore Movement
The locavore movement has become a much larger cause in recent years. People are increasingly aware of some of the issues pertaining to eating
foods grown far away. These issues have banded some communities together to sacrifice their favorite foods and to begin buying locally grown foods.
These communities are experiencing numerous benefits as a result of their decision to change their culture and eat locally grown foods. Food that is
grown locally is significantly fresher than what can be found in a supermarket where the "fresh" food is stored for weeks. These foods that are stored
can lose lots of nutritional value quickly, making locally grown foods healthier and fresher. Professor Marion Nestle said that the 100–mile diet is,
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Locavores Persuasive Essay
Locavores are people who have decided to eat locally grown or produced products. The more people discuss locavores, the more support local farms get
from surrounding communities. Placing the local farms closer in proximity with one another will minimize the amount of pollution in the air due to
harmful chemicals secreted through transportation. Produce from local farms contain less contamination from chemicals that try to kill pesticides.
Local farms have organic certifications refurbishments, which are requirements that have to be met in order to sell organic produce, such as using the
correct materials approved by the USDA and knowing what materials are not approved. From these positive initiatives conducted to help improve one's
health and

Locavore Analysis
Locavores are idealistic people who put efforts into improving the local economy. Slowly, the world begins to understand the meaning behind locavore
strategies of striving for optimal health and nutrition. Although locavores have a positive intention of leading a more sustainable and healthy food
system, they often misguide or misinform others, doing more harm than good. Locally grown produce is guaranteed to preserve fresh produce and
maximum nutritional values, however, on the other hand, Americans are not "nutrient–deprived" (B). Professor Marion Nestle, also a former chair of
nutrition, assures that a 100–mile diet is "almost certainly more nutritious than what the average American [is] eating. That doesn't mean it is necessary
to eat...show more content...
According to an analysis by Rich Pirog of the Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture, "transportation accounts for only 11% of food's carbon
footprint." Forbes also notes that it "is not food miles but apples per gallon," implying that transportation is not the primary cause of greenhouse gasses
(C). A chart excerpted from an environmental magazine visualizes the total greenhouse gas emission from factory products, measuring the climate
impact in metric tons of CO2 per household–year due to transportation, production, and wholesale. Of all products, production showed to be most
harmful towards the environment, releasing over five times more emission than that of transportation and wholesale/retail. Some might again argue
that the problem is not the "where" or "how," but "what is being made." Referring back to the graph, red meat proves to emit much more greenhouse
gas than any other product (D). Another solution can be to cut down on red meat or become a hearty vegan. Locavores strongly believe in buying
local produce to decrease pollution; one way or another, distance is the least of our problems – it is all about how the products are

Locavores Research Paper
Locavores: Beneficial or harmful? Locavores are a group of people who prefer to consume locally grown products and they get these products
usually within a 100 mile radius from home. The main idea of this local movement is to avoid consuming products that are moved a long distance
from the farm to the market. This a great movement for us the consumers because we know what we're eating and how it was produced, in other
words it has many beneficial health factors. Subsequently, there is always two sides to every coin. The bad side of conventional farming methods
used by corporate farmers that result in the shipping of foods long distances to major grocery stores. Big farm operations require energy at many points
– petrochemicals and energy are

Rhetorical Analysis: The Locavore's Dilemma
Eating food produced within a hundred–mile radius has never been a prominent concern historically, though there has been a recent increase in this
trend. Those that are rigorously set on this new ideology are being labeled "locavores". Christophe Pelletier, being a proficient individual on the topic of
food production had an educated opinion on the locavore's predicted way of life. Pelletier's, "The Locavore's Dilemma", provides multiple examples
to support his belief that informing every resident of the carbon footprint their food contains would realistically carryout the locavore's ideology to a
more viable agriculture. His blog post on this ideology goes into depth about the physical and economical destruction they would provoke. This would
include: the possibility of famine, lack of needed nutritional supplements,...show more content...
He uses small phrases that can be considered humorous throughout the more serious parts of his writing to establish character. This establishment of
character along with applying personal experience creates a strong development of trustworthiness between him and his audience. When Pelletier
addresses the loss of coffee, tea, and beer–known treasures for the British Columbia population–he is able to utilize the lighthearted remark "at least,
there is no shortage of water" (Pelletier p.703). As he takes a look beyond food itself, the hundred–mile radius would begin to affect many other
agricultural products. Cotton, wool, and even the manufacturing of cars would soon fade away. For Pelletier's readers that are just beginning to think
abroad the restrictions of only local food sources; it is quite an eye opener. He uses another frivolous response, "the 100–mile rule will solve traffic
problems" to include a passively positive outlook on what local locavores should expect to experience (Pelletier

Essay On The Locavore Movement
The locavore movement is a powerful and extremely healthy movement; it cuts down on transportation, supports a town's economy, and helps
encourage society to consume healthier foods. It is a powerful movement that would be great to the community in many ways. It would not just benefit
some people in the community but everybody individually. It is also an amazing way to bring the people in the community together. The locavore
movement encourages people in towns to consume more locally grown food, by society consuming locally grown food transportation is cut down
which helps better the environment. Since locally grown food is produce that is cultivated in the community transportation is down to a minimum
which is a blessing for the environment. " Eating local is better for air quality and pollution than eating organic. " ( Source A ) less transportation use
helps lessen the pollution in the air which in turn helps provide the community with cleaner fresher air. " The move towards local food for all its
trendiness highlights one of the problematic pieces of the modern food economy : the increasing reliance on foods shipped halfway round the world. "
( Source E ) The...show more content...
Local farmers markets give back to the community from the income that is made from selling produce which helps boost the community's economy.
" Eating local means more for the local economy. " ( Source A ) Purchasing local foods from the community are a spectacular way to provide for a
community's economy. " According to a study by the New Economics Foundation in London a dollar spent locally generates twice as much income
for the local economy. " ( Source A ) Local food markets are better for the economy because the income would go to the community unlike a big chain
supermarket where the income made in that establishment would go to a corporate office, none of the income would be put towards the

Essay On Locavores
Imagining a community in 2020 where the majority of the population were Locavores is quite difficult due to the fact that modern society has
expanded and is continuing to grow all the time. Locavores are people who only eat food within a 100 mile radius.(source g) The idea of being a
locavore is new but slightly unnecessary due to the era of production our society lives on today. Foods shipped from far places may be lacking the
nutrients that any other fruit or vegetable grown in a farm closer would have. (source B) But the nutritional differences are "marginal", it's not much of
a difference, not enough to affect a person's health anyways. Considering the fast–paced societies growing today in America, relying on the "high
demand" farmers would have to meet, can slow down the community's economic growth speed. In 2020 the society will...show more content...
Buying locally "supports an area's farmers and, in turn, strengthens the community".(source C) However, the localization of foods would have a
negative effect on farmers who rely on Americans by reducing demand. The decrease in business for these farmers will cause less crops to be
made because, if 90 percent of your products is no longer being bought, then you're losing money if you make any more than 10 percent. Another
thing food localization will cause is local businesses outside of these communities, like farmers markets to foreclose, because farmers will be
forced to look for different work. If all the farmers in New Zealand are focusing on supplying the US than no one is focused on what percent of
foods stay locally in New Zealand. Therefore a major movement towards being a locavore could have a big, negative effect on major food production
across the country. Many jobs will be lost, many families will be homeless, and many families will split

Locavore Movement Research Paper
Being a locavore is a very healthy lifestyle that is inhabited by human who eat locally grown or produced products. The locavore movement has
created notice to other local towns that eating locally produced food can preserve your health and increase the town's economy. Eating at a local
farmers market can ensure the local economy by providing income towards those farmers that produce these foods. The locavore movement is
becoming big in present day, and there are many ways that this movement can have a positive impact on a town, for example, the economy will
increase, fresher food that doesn't travel, and with purchases on local produces provide much needed jobs. The locavore movement is a healthy
lifestyle that is well adapted to the human diet that can preserve the environment and make the common rural citizen help out the community....show
more content...
Local small towns need as much support from the community to stay functioning, and running. With being a locavore it provides the economy of
these small towns to increase due to funds going to the farmers, and stores that sell these products. Locally owned businesses rely on the community
to purchase their products, and if these local shops aren't receiving income than these shops can't stay in business. The locavore movement is
important for rural economies, and better for air quality. "A dollar spent locally generates twice as much income for the local economy" (Source A)
Jennifer Maiser refers to the locavore movement as beneficial to food that's locally grown. The community provides funds for towns suffering and
even eating locally grown food is healthier and has much more of a variety than shipped

Locavore Movement
The locavore movement has become more popular and has gained more attention in the recent years. Social and media attention usually display
locavorism as an idealistic lifestyle, "Buy local, shrink the distance food travels, save the planet."(Source C). However, there are some negative issues
and implications with the locavore movement. One of the issues of the locavore movement is the mile range. According to both source B and source
G, the food in a locavore's diet should come from within a 100 mile radius. This mile radius could possibly be an issue for people living in more
urbanized cities like Houston, New York City, and Los Angeles. In cities like these, the mile range would make it harder for people to participate

Analysis Of The Locavore Movement
People who hold nutrition and locally grown foods and other products on a prestigious level are known as locavores. The locavore movement has
risen over the past ten years to improve the economy and nurishment within one's local area. As Jennifer Maiser explains in Source A, a study found
that eating locally does in fact improve the economic value of that area. An organization in London conducted a study that proved the practice of a
locavore doubled their income, and kept money from leaving the community to be spent elsewhere. Highlighted in Source E, Pallavi Gogoi stated,
"Small farmers will be able to get up to 75% of their organic certification costs reimbursed...and obtain crop insurance," which shows that it is very
beneficial

Locavore Synthesis Essay
Locavores consume only locally grown foods in an effort to reduce their carbon footprints and lose weight, among other reasons. The popularity of
locavorism has grown dramatically over the last decade, and its merits are extolled by scientists and ordinary consumers alike. The locavore movement
seems to be indisputably beneficial to the environment, the economy, and to consumer health, yet close examination of its common tenets reveals
issues which should be taken into account before beginning a locavore diet. Locavorism's environmental benefits are referenced frequently by its
supporters . "Food miles" – the distance your food has traveled before it reaches your plate – are a commonly used term. Because of the substantial
amount of fuel...show more content...
Locavores argue that food travelling long distances before being consumed declines in nutrition as antioxidants and nutrients decay – meaning that food
which travels less distance (and is therefore eaten faster) is better for your health. However, Marion Nestle (as quoted by Alisa Smith and J.B.
McKinnon) thinks that the nutrition argument isn't based in science. According to her, "a person making smart choices from the global megamart
can easily meet all the body's needs", and "there will be nutritional differences, but they'll be marginal" (Source B). It's clearly not unhealthy to eat
locally grown foods, and they may even be better for your health. However, the benefits of eating freshly picked food may not be as great as
locavores claim they are. Locavorism has both strong supporters and vehement opposers, as most trends do. Overall, eating locally isn't a bad idea: it
can connect you with community farmers and help you to choose healthier meals. However – as with all topics – it isn't all black and white. Many
common locavorism arguments aren't grounded in science, and people exalt it while blindly ignoring the aforementioned issues. People considering
locavorism should ensure that they consider the negatives before beginning a locavore

Synthesis Essay: The Locavore Movement
I picked up a sweet, fresh, bright red apple at the farmer's market. The tangy smell of the apple makes me hungry, knowing I'm getting the freshest
and most nutritious apple. Though is it really any different from the apple grown 300 miles away? The locavores are people who decided to eat
locally grown produce, this has become known as the locavore movement and is quickly becoming widespread among more people. But, is a locavore
movement really needed? The fact is, there is no difference between local produce and produce that was grown hundreds of miles away. The locavore
movement may not make a huge difference.
A main argument for eating locally grown produce is that, it has more nutrients than store bought food. Based on source A, the longer the produce has
been stored the more the nutritional value goes down, "... the nutritional value ... declines with time"(source A). Though, the longer the produce sits
does not affect the nutritional value, this issue is just a red herring. Nutrition isn't a factor that can be considered when people talk about the locavore
movement, " ... at New York University, she waved away the nutrition issue as a red herring"(source B). The nutritional difference will be so small that
it won't make a difference no matter how someone looks at it, this...show more content...
Ordinarily, transport is said to be affecting the environment, but in reality the carbon footprint doesn't make enough of an impact to make a
difference, " ... transportation accounts for only 11% of food's carbon footprint."(source C). Continually , the environment someone may live doesn't
provide lots of the produce they may need. If someone lives in Hawaii, they could get more fresh fruit than someone who lives in Alaska, as seen in
source G. With this implication to keep in mind, at some point someone would need to go to the store to get some produce, it isn't all offered and
grown where they

Research Paper On Locavore
A locavore is a character who desires to eat locally to empower a community, in addition, to achieve healthy systems except locavores fail to
remember one crucial group, the rest of Earth. Locavores who believe they are improving Earth are actually harming it even greater than before.
Furthermore, not only is it harmful to mother Earth, but even the locavores themselves. Locavores assume they decide to eat locally; however, in
reality, locavores are forced to eat locally as no choice is available. Understand locavores as well as their local food movements as it is seen superb to
every other eye; however, if carefully inspected, it is only an idea that will cause misconduct.
To begin this rant a locavore is one who limits themselves, a negative...show more content...
No matter, to restate, the entire world is affected if a locavore movement is to begin in a community. See the problem is, when people try to include
themselves in the community they start to believe they are actually helping. For example, a locavore shops at a local farm to support him and him
only. What about other farmers who had the same dream, industry businesses that formed to produce food for the people. All around the world people
should realize how important everyone is. Everyone wants to have a role in life no matter what it is, but if only worried about one's community then
this is seen as selfish act only to improve one's reputation. "Locavores argue that buying local food supports an area's farmers and, in turn, strengthens
the community (McWilliams, Source C)." McWilliams continues to argue that it does in fact hurt other farmers around the world, how can one be
satisfied when another farmer could be struggling all because of a locavore movement. One idea or movement that is community based should not be
enough to take effect on the rest of the

Write An Essay On Locavore
The smell of fresh vegetables and fruit, the vibrant colors from every direction you look, and the friendly smiles that come from the question, "Would
you like to try one?" Yes, this is farmer's market many people attend to buy the foods they eat at home. But why? The locavore movement, a trend for
people to eat locally grown products, can have many benefits when looking into the environment around you and personal nutrition. In our busy lives,
the environment is probably one of the last problems on our mind. But, it is very important because the environment's health affects everyone including
future generations. In source A, it quotes "eating local is better for air quality and pollution than eating organic." When looking into transportation,

Locavore Research Paper
Today's increasing popularity with becoming a locavore has sky rocketed with the new age of health nuts. The main issue with becoming a locavore
is whether the fresh produce is local. However, as part of a group that enjoys the luxury of eating fresh food, becoming a locavore should be the only
way of living.
Fresh produce is such an amazing experience, yet many people haven't been blessed to try the crisp bite of the food. Per (Marser), "food bought at your
local farmer's market is often picked 24 hours prior to your purchase." (Marser) also states that, "Because the produce is handled less, locally grown
fruit does not have to stand up to the rigors of shipping." Meaning the produce is given the primal amount of time to grow before being

Locavores Pros And Cons
In the world of today, a new form of agriculture is starting to take place called "locavores." Locavores seek to change the way people eat by only
growing and selling produce locally. However, many problems must be brought up to light before choosing this method as a benefit to the community.
Granted, locavores promise to help the local community by benefiting local farmers. In doing so, the local farmers get more of a financial advantage
leaving in exertion the destitute people who work for produce companies in foreign countries. As stated in source C, when small time farmers
challenge large companies and win, it takes the work and financial security of thousands desperate workers. Also stated in source C, buying certain
products from local

The Locavore Movement
The Locavore movement is sweeping across the nation in a swirl of excitement and thrill. The locavore movement encourages members to buy and eat
foods locally. This movement (when used properly), will allow the Nation to cut down GMO intake and maximize our nutrition, lower shipping cost,
and boost our local economies.
Genetically modified foods (GMO) are a necessary part of our nation's ability to keep up with the required food. They allow us to make food bigger,
and last longer in order to enjoy them year round. However, "food begins to lose nutrition as soon as it is harvested." (Source A). With this information
we may begin to see the danger of keeping foods such as apples for extended periods of time; that is they lose much of their nutrition. In order to avoid
eating non nutritional foods it is imperative that we eat closer to home. This will allow us to reduce the amounts of GMOs injected to foods by eating
them in season and not needing them to last as long....show more content...
Our sense of Adventure and inability to abstain from new and exotic endeavors has bound us with a flaxen cord. With each new finding probing us
to find more, we fulfill our curiosity. We eat more food and grow in knowledge. And this is great for mankind, in fact it lead to our nations
foundation. Now, we trade and barter foods grown across the world. This makes it expensive to ship foods as well as difficult to eat food with less
GMOs. And for foods that are only able to grow in specific climates it leads to "the exploitation of cheap labor." (Source F). Meaning that countries
without minimum wage requirements work long hours with unsubstantial pay. It damages their economies and communities due to the lack of

Locavorism
"Green living" is becoming the way of the future. Everyone will eat fresh, locally sourced foods, packed with nutrients. GMO free. As more people
grab ahold of this trend and spread it around, shaming those who don't follow in their footsteps, they ignore the negative impacts that could develop
through locavorism.
Buying locally reduces transportation, therefore less carbon emission is released into the air. Does this not mean that locavorism could save the planet?
Well it actually may not according to James McWilliams, a writer on Forbes.com. McWilliams says, "factors other than shipping far outweigh the
energy it takes to transport food...transportation accounts for only 11% of food's carbon footprint." McWilliams regards things such as water usage,
fertilizer types, processing methods and packaging techniques to prove that buying fresher foods is not always the right idea. Farms and companies
that are said to be 'green' and 'better for the planet' could actually be harming the planet much more than they thought.
McWilliams also references the issue of the economy, stating, "it also hurts farmers in other parts of the world. The U.K. buys... green beans from
Kenya... threatens the livelihood of 1.5 million sub–Saharan farmers." Buying strictly locally grown foods will put large...show more content...
In an excerpt from a book about the 100 mile diet by Alisa Smith and J.B. McKinnon, the authors speak to professor Marion Nestle, the former chair of
nutrition, food studies, and public health at New York university, about people's concerns about the foods they eat. Nestle says, "it is [not] necessary to
eat locally to be healthy... people are not nutrient–deprived." The largest fight for eating locally is the health benefits, yet eating locally does not mean a
person is less healthy and/or nutrient–deprived than that of a locavore

Benefits Of The Locavore Movement
When it comes to the topic of eating locally grown foods, most of us will readily agree that it is beneficial. Where this agreement usually ends,
however, is on the question of whether the locavores movement is necessary for a community. Whereas some are convinced that the locavore
movement holds more cons, others maintain that the pros heavily outweigh the cons. Although the movement may come across some troubling
difficulties, the locavore movement has many positive implications on the community.
The locavore movement has many health and local economy benefits. Health benefits come from buying locally; by doing this foods have a higher
nutrition content (Source A). Because this food was picked just a day before buying, any produce will

Locavore Movement Gains Support

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Locavore Movement Gains Support

Similar to Locavore Movement Gains Support (6)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Locavore Movement Gains Support