The Mexican Revolution Essay

The Mexican Revolution Essay
The Mexican Revolution
There was a huge revolution in the country of Mexico that started in the year 1910, led by Porfirio Diaz, the president of Mexico in 1910. In the
1860's Diaz was important to Mexican politics and then was elected president in 1877. Diaz said that he would only be president for one year and
then would resign, but after four years he was re–elected as the President of Mexico. Porfirio Diaz and the Mexican revolution had a huge impact on the
country of Mexico that is still felt in some places today.
The earliest start to the Mexican Revolution of 1910 happened one hundred years earlier when two priests, Miguel Hidalgo and Jose Morelos, led a
stand against the Spanish colonial officials who were...show more content...
Diaz used this philosophy to make reasons for his policies. Diaz kept his old slogan "liberty, order, progress", but, the word liberty was removed
from the slogan. Another slogan "few politics, much administration" also became common and popular. Foreign firms began to invest in Mexico
because it became more structurally and economically stable. These investments gave Diaz the money he needed to construct highways, railroads,
telegraph lines, and new industries. The city of Veracruz used the money to create oil fields, and elsewhere the mining industry was brought back.
Mexico, fifty years before was seen as a third–world nation, became the standard for developing countries because of its high tech industry and
technology. Although these were all big steps for Mexico's economy, in the end it was responsible for the bringing down of Diaz. (Encarta 98,
www.eh.net.htm)
The people in power became rich along with the nation, however, the majority of the population in the cities and the countryside remained poor. Along
with those people, rich and poor Mexicans began to resent their trust on foreign investments. More importantly, the new generation of Mexicans was
full of political ambition, and the Diaz era had such control of the government that no one new was able to enter their league. This combination of
factors was what sparked the revolution of 1910. In 1908 US journalist James Creelman interviewed Porfirio Diaz. In the interview Diaz
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

During the Mexican Revolution there were many prominent figures that emerged during the long struggle. Some of the figures had a positive impact
on the region, and some others a very negative impact on the people of Mexico and their quest for an uncorrupted government. One figure that stands
out in the border region between Mexico and The United States during this time is General Francisco "Pancho" Villa. To understand Pancho Villa's
significant role during this uprising it is important to understand who Villa was prior to the revolution, and what acts lead to his rise to power.
Francisco "Pancho" Villa (born Doroteo Arango on June 5th, 1878) was known as a bandit prior to his life as a Mexican General. Villa was born
to sharecropper parents on a hacienda in San Juan Del Rio, Durango, Mexico. After the death of his father, Villa only in his teens became the head
of his family. Villa soon found himself on the run from the law and the Haciendas owner after he shot the man in the foot after an altercation over
Villa's sister; this is what led to him initially becoming an outlaw. While on the run as a fugitive Villa adapted other well known bandito ways of
making money including robbing haciendas, and sticking up wealthy mine owners, this is also when he officially dropped Arango and only used
Francisco "Pancho" Villa (Katz, 1998). Some bits of folklore can be found when describing Villa's actions during this time period. There are tales of
him acting like a Robin

The French and Mexican Revolutions Essay
What is a revolution? By definition it means the overthrow of a government by those who are governed. That is exactly what the French and the
Mexican revolutions were all about. The living conditions and overall treatment of the poor, pheasants, lower class, last man on the totem pole or
what ever you want to call them, was a large factor in the coming of these revolutions. "Those who are governed" are exactly what the lower class
people were. Also, liberty was one of the people's major concerns. They were ruled by men whose only desire was power and greed which is what led
them into revolt.
The treatment of the "majority", which was the lower class, had a significant role in each of these revolutions. The French revolution was...show more
content...
The "majority" or "creoles" (Mexican born natives) as they were called, "out number all the others ten to one." (Robinson, Fay) Yet they were
treated the worst and, by the way, they were the ones who paid most taxes. These lower class peoples were forced to barely survive on meager pay
for manual labor and menial jobs. Many of them ended up peddling or begging in the streets. (Americana)
The men that drove these revolts were very determined to change their world. When Marquis de Lafayette, a French noble, went to America and
fought as a volunteer in the American Revolution, he was inspired by their quest for liberty. He brought this inspiration home with him, and began
the French pursuit for freedom. In 1788 "absolute monarchy was collapsing... What would replace it?" (Mckay, 706). The three estates would quarrel
for the next few years about how to proceed. In the end the National Assembly would form, vowing not to disband until a new constitution was born.
On August 27, 1789 the National Assembly (NA) issued the: Declaration of the rights of man. By 1790 the NA would hold the power of lawmaking.
Although it did not last long, the idea was there and it did bring about some type of reform. Unfortunately, Napoleon would reign and dictatorship
would once again reign in France.
The Mexican Revolution had much of the same results as did the French. Encouraged by both the American

Mexican Revolution
Assignment 1: Major Causes of the revolution in Mexico.
Based on John Tutino, From Insurrection to Revolution in Mexico
The Mexican Revolution (1910–1917) was caused by a variety of factors. It is impossible to place the blame on one single event or person because of
the complexity of the Mexican people. One thing is for sure, if people are deprived of food and water, they will find a way to obtain enough to
survive. History proves that in desperate times people will take matters into their own hands. When a countries leadership wavers, and conditions
become poor enough that people are starving, they will respond negatively. It seems that any time the Mexicans lose the ability to grow their own
maize they become discontent....show more content...
Diaz had done well at expanding the economic system especially by producing a system of Mexican Railroads. He is also given credit with the
economic growth in the Southern Regions. Mexican land owners were losing land for owing money. For example.
In Central Mexico, a heavily indebted Mariano Riva Palacio lost in 1870 the estates he had worked to acquire since the 1830 's, and that had provided
the economic base at Chalco that underlay his political dominance of the state of Mexico for years.
Tutino also discussed how interaction with the French could also lead to loss of land. Large chunks of land were broken up under Diaz, in order
to redistribute lands in order to yield more productive areas to generate commerce. Crop failures in 1907 were another cause; the people could not
afford to import American Maize, and were unable to grow their own crops for subsistence. All of these separate but different events led to the
people of Mexico revolting, and brought a significant amount of change to the landscape of Mexico ever since. In the southern areas were
uprisings were held to a minimum, people were still able to feed themselves and their children. The Elite were still making money and able to afford
the near slave labor wages by giving the workers who migrated advances on their pay in the off seasons, for a promise to go to work at a later date.
This system was used in the North, but ultimately failed

Mexican Revolution Research Paper
The Mexican revolution started in 1910, and lasted for a decade, at least that is the common conception of the revolution, but as historians gain a
deeper understanding of the revolution these common sense statements become murkier. The revolution was not a singular event that lasted ten years,
and it was not really a singular revolution, and arguments could be made that in some places it was not really a revolution at all. This paper will argue
the Mexican revolution was a complicated event that defies traditional explanations and the usual definition of a singular revolution. This paper will be
organized the following way. First it will look at the cause of the revolution, looking at both events in the north and the south. Second, it will...show
more content...
He was actually a rich land owner, and something of a fop who didn't fit the revolutionary mold, with his vegetarianism, and belief in homeopathic
medicine (Easterling, pg 42). What Fransico Madero wanted was a liberal open system, and to that extent he attempted to challenge Porfirio in a
presidential election after the president suggested he would actually have an open election. The election never really happened though, as Francisco
was pushed out and exiled to the United States (Class notes, Feb 2nd). This left Francisco with a choice, except his exile, or start a rebellion in hopes of

The Mexican Revolution Summary
The book is a non–fiction book written by, Alan Knight and was Published on May 5, 1980.The Mexican Revolution began in 1910, it began as a
movement of a middle–class protest against the long standing dictatorship of Porfirio DIaz. In 1876, Diaz, an Indian general in the Mexican Army,
took control of the nation and continued to be elected until 1910, he also had held power in 1876–1911. From 1884 to 1911, he was an unofficial ruler
from 1880 to 1884, he was a respected political leader. In 1908, DIaz had an interview with an United States journalist James Creelman, and Diaz told
James that would be ready for free elections in 1910, so in 1910, Diaz promised the people that he was going to let there be free elections. Porfirio Diaz
was born

Mexican Revolution Vs Russian Revolution
The Russian and the Mexican revolution can be compared because they both were a social revolution. there was a dictator, who does not rules the
country Diaz of Mexico. Both leaders did not keep the in country in a right way. Stalin was a dictator of Russia and Porfirio Diaz oMexco. Both
leaders did not keep the promise they had made and rules the country for long time, making the laws in self–centered way. Also both revolutions had
people who kills the opponents, such as secret police in Stalinist Russia. By this, many people suffered. Some fled to other places where they can be
safe but some died out.
In my conclusion the Russian and Mexican revolution was not successful because the country did not keep their promises and they rule their

History: The Mexican Revolution
The Mexican revolution was a great success as it restored the values that the Mexican people valued. After the violent reign of Porfiriato–marred by
massive wealth inequality–ended, the Mexican people rallied for a stable government with the greatest focus on equal opportunities in government,
land ownership, and the creation of jobs. The new government embraced the ideals held by the Mexican people and this lead to great success with
goals being maintained through the 1940s. At the start of the revolutionary era, people began to rally behind three party leaders: Emiliano Zapata, who
focused on land reform, Francisco Villa, who rallied for workers and peasants, and Venustiano Carranza, who wanted to restore democratic principles.
Shortly

Mexican Revolution Research Paper
Every revolution, from the American revolution of 1776 to the Mexican one of 1910, to current ones, share one thing in common: they start with an
idea. This idea calls for some kind of change and seeks to overturn the current method of running things. It does this by protesting or fighting, and even
though most people see rebellion as a fight for control of the government, my students need to see that all revolutions start with a thought. In the
Mexican revolution Magon never lifted a gun, but without him the revolution may not have occured at all. My students need to understand the
importance of this, and maybe see how their speaking out can transform the world around them. Magon did not have the blessing of free speech, and
went to jail for his actions, yet he still spoke out. My students need to form an opinion on this, and if they think about how important his newspaper
was, they will have to think about him and his trials. The punishments he went through, do not happen in...show more content...
Magon is often considered to be an anarchist, although he never outright claimed that title. Students need to understand the ideology behind anarchy,
and how the idea came into being. The working class of Mexico possessed few rights and little property. Diaz had downtrodden the majority of
Mexico into peasants who were allowed to work the land, and keep some of the profits. In that era land equaled wealth, so only a few rich families
actually owned land. Magon experienced this, and since he had an education he remembered why only a few families had land today. His article
discusses how the Spanish took communal lands away from the indigenous people, and put property laws in place to call it their own. This is why
Magon labels private property laws as unjust, and calls for their removal altogether. Students need to understand the reasoning behind this anarchist
idea, and analyze whether it is a good one or

After the Mexican Revolution, which took place from 1910 – 1920, Mexican art saw a change in the type of art being created. Although the focus of
creating art with an indigenous and Mexican theme continued, the country saw a shift to art presenting socialist ideals. The government saw value in
working with local artist and commissioning them to create murals that would influence their political agendas. However, what these murals mostly did
was strengthen the Mexican culture and bring pride to the indigenous heritage. Although this time period has come and gone, its influence over
Mexican art and culture is still very apparent today and can even be seen in Mexican American communities today.

The Mexican Revolution began November 20th, 1910. It is disputable that it extended up to two decades and seized more than 900,000 lives. This
revolution, however, also ended dictatorship in Mexico and restored the rights of farm workers, or peons, and its citizens. Revolutions are often
started because a large group of individuals want to see a change. These beings decided to be the change that they wanted to see and risked many
things, including their lives. Francisco "Pancho" Villa and Emiliano Zapata are the main revolutionaries remembered. These figures of the revolution
took on the responsibility that came with the title. Their main goal was to regain the rights the people deserved. The peons believed that they deserved
the land that...show more content...
DГaz, afraid of losing his presidency, rigged the election and had Madero arrested. After his release, he fled to the United States and planned a revolt
for November 20th, 1910. While this revolt did fail, it inspired many people who were tired of being dictated to join in a revolution. Banding Together
Soon after this failed revolt, groups began to form in hopes to successfully remove Diaz. In Northern Mexico, Francisco Villa returned and gathered an
army of Mexican cowboys. Another army was led by a peasant unsatisfied with the government with the name of Pascual Orozco. One of the bigger
groups consisted of Emiliano Zapata and they were called the Zapatistas. This force grew to include over 5,000 men. In 1911 these groups worked
together to overrun DГaz. Zapata seized the town of Cuautla, and afterwards cut off the town from Mexico City. DГaz started to realize what was
happening and fled to Europe. This victory would start of a new conflict beginning.
The New Conflict
Soon after the victory Francisco Madero was declared as the new president. Madero tried to please everybody which led to nothing being done. Nobody
liked the lack of progress and people once again started forming revolutionary groups. Victoriano Huerta, the leader of the conservative federal army,
and a faction of people led by DГaz's nephew Felix DГaz fought for ten days in Mexico City. This battle is known as La Decena Tragica. On the ninth
day of the battle, Felix DГaz

Mexican Independence After the people of Mexico freed themselves from Spanish control, they faced difficulties trying to officially establish
themselves as a country. Despite their independence, Mexico had to also live with the aftermath of Spanish colonialism. Part of the aftermath included
socio–political issues amongst the Mexican people. In an effort to establish themselves as a nation, they first had to free themselves from a Spanish
ideology, for Mexico truly was not free after their independence. The socio–political predicaments contribute to the evolution of modern day Mexico.
To begin, let's go back the start of Mexico's independence: "Mexico" was declared in 1821, and the Spanish crown lost control after the Mexican War
for Independence (Menchaca 161). As a result of Mexico's independence, the ownership of power was given to the Mexican people. This led to
immediate socio–political and territorial changes. Mexico's war for independence was inspired by the Catholic priest known as Miguel Hidalgo y
Costilla. After his call for action against the Spanish in the town of Dolores, Mexico, also known as the "Cry of Dolores," the people of Mexico
united to rebel against the Spanish (AcuГ±a 40). This led to an eleven year war to achieve independence. That very first day of the revolution will
always hold symbolic meaning in the eyes of the Mexican people: 16 September 1810. Alas, Mexico was left with the debris of 300 years of Spanish
control following their immediate

The Mexican Revolution Essay
The Mexican Revolution was the culmination of a mass of political, economic, and social tension that accompanied the regime of the dictator Porfirio
Diaz. The Revolution began with the aims to overthrow Diaz, but the Revolution had a pronounced effect on the organization of Mexico's government,
economy, and society.
Porfirio Diaz was the president of Mexico when the Revolution broke out. He was elected in 1877, and although he swore to step down in 1880, he
continued to be reelected until 1910. He claimed that he was justified in this because he brought stability to Mexico. However, this was hardly the case.
Diaz's regime aimed to industrialize Mexico, and foreign investors such as the United States and Britain...show more content...
After Diaz had won by a landslide, he released Madero from prison. Madero promptly fled to San Antonio, Texas to plan a revolution. There he wrote
the Plan of St. Luis Potosi, which said that the election was fraudulent and that he was the provisional president of Mexico. The plan was purely
political and Madero planned to have a completely democratic government. The plan said nothing about changing the situation for farmers and
peasants. However, rural peasants latched onto the plan, thinking that Madero would also reform the country economically and socially. There were
many revolutions carried out under Madero's flag, specifically revolutions carried out by Pancho Villa and Emiliano Zapata.
Different groups had very different goals for what the Mexican revolution would accomplish. The rural peasants and indigenous people wanted the
land to be taken out of the hands of the aristocracy or the elite and have the land be evenly divided between the rural towns. They wanted the territory
of their ancestors back because it had been stripped from them during the regime of Porfirio Diaz. They also wanted to be taken out of poverty and to
have farming available to them again so that they could sustain their lives and work for their living. Therefore, because the peasants were suffering
under the regime of Diaz, they wholeheartedly supported the revolution and everything that came with it. The Roman Catholic Church,

Mexican Revolution Essay
The Mexican Revolution completely changed Mexico's society and its government. It is called one of the greatest upheavals of the 20th century by
many. It all started in 1910 and ended a dictatorship and created a constitutional republic. The United States played a major role in the revolution by
supporting the side who occupied the seats of power for both economic reasons and political reasons. Their contribution varied by supporting the
Mexican regimes in the beginning but then rejecting them by the end of the revolution. That's why I believe that without the intervention of the United
States, the revolution would have ended another way. So to what extent did the United States interact and influence the Mexican Revolution from
1910–1920? I believe the answer is that without the intervention of the United States, Mexico could still be a dictatorship. The Mexican Revolution
began as a protest against the dictatorship and policies of Porfirio DГaz. He ran a 34 year dictatorship and his policies favored the wealthy families that
monopolized economic and political power in Mexico. There were very few wealthy Mexicans and they were typically the politicians of cities,
landowners, and foreign investors. Diaz suppressed the press and all the worker strikes that asked for better wages and better treatment. In the state of
Veracruz, textile workers rioted in January 1907 at the huge RГo Blanco factory which was at the time the largest in the world, protesting against their
unfair

A Reflection Of The Mexican Revolution
A Reflection of the Mexican Revolution "'I love the revolution like a volcano in eruption; I love the volcano because it's a volcano; the revolution
because it's the revolution!'" cries a revolutionary soldier in Azuela's The Underdogs (159). The Mexican Revolution of 1910 was aimed to overthrow
the dictatorship of the Mexican government, which was in constant turmoil as presidents were constantly toppled from power. Porfirio Diaz, the
president at the time the uprising began, was removed from power when revolutionary generals, Emiliano Zapata and Francisco "Pancho" Villa,
answered Francisco Madero's call for rebellion. After Madero took power, he was defeated by Victoriano Huerta.Venustiano Carranzaseized power
from Huerta, and Alvaro Obregon gained control after Carranza was deposed. The revolution lasted a decade and ended with the new Mexican
Constitution of 1917. These events are told in The Underdogs, by Mariano Azuela, in which a native Indian, Demetrio Macias, is forced to side
with and aid the rebels when his home is destroyed and his loved ones are put in danger. Throughout the battles, Macias becomes hardened by war,
which eventually leads him into Villa's army as a general. Yet, his original gang of rebels and newly recruited men begin to lose battle after battle.
The soldiers go to war and some do not come back. Written from the revolutionaries' point of view, The Underdogs, by Marino Azuela, is a historically
accurate novel that argues that the ideals of

The Causes Of The Mexican Revolution
101 Presidents and More– The Causes of the Mexican Revolution
"Democracy is the destiny of mankind; freedom its indestructible arm" –Benito Juarez
Mexico was building up to its revolution long before activists like Francisco Madero and Emiliano Zapata. From 1840 to 1910; Mexico went from a
war–torn and newly freed nation to a nation on the brink of civil war. How did it get there? Through a series of wars, leaders, and policies, which
proved causation politically, socially, and economically to the Mexican Revolution.
The loss of material and economic productivity in the war for Independence had long–lasting economic consequences on Mexico. It severely damaged
agriculture, commerce, industry, and mining sectors. The most severe blow to the Mexican economy was the loss of capital; money either fled the
country or was withdrawn from circulation . After the war, Mexico fell into 50 years of economic depression. The speedy rehabilitation of the mining
sector would have aided national recovery greatly, but both financial and technical problems hindered its recovery until the 1880s. Because Mexico
lagged behind the rest of the world for half a century, great economic advances were needed towards the turn of the century.
The two main sources of power after Mexican Independence were the Church and the military. The Catholic Church owned considerable sums of land,
and gave loans to other landowners. This secured its alliance with the upper class of society. The military

Mexico's Revolution
Ariel Elias
HIST 112
Proffesor Cummings
17 February 2013
Ariel Elias
Professor Cummings
Hist 112
17 February 2013
Mexico's Revolution
Many nations across time and the world have experienced a revolution. From the American revolution to the French revolution, history has proven
conflict can engage a nation at any moment. Tanter explains that two possible scenarios, changes in the economic development and the level of
education are likely to cause revolutions (Tanter 264). A revolution can be composed of a group of individuals who are willing to make the ultimate
sacrifice in exchange for change in the existing...show more content...
Chavez states that for men and boys there was only one option during the revolution, becoming a soldier (Chavez 423). YoungMexico believed that the
revolution would bring social justice and a stronger Mexico. The men from the mountains, farms and villages would unite under leaders such as
Emiliano Zapata and fight against larger Mexican armies. There was a sense of pride and purpose in the revolution. The revolution empowered the
average Mexican and encouraged them to fight. Knight states that revolutionaries had inadequate arms and training, but managed to dominate battles
against a superior Mexican army (Knight 31). Eventually following many years of fighting a man named Alvaro Obregon was elected president.
Washington states that the ideals of the Mexican revolution would eventually provide the people with a Constitution in 1917 (Washington 505). Mexico

would finally reach a point in history where nation could focus on the entire nation and not an elite group. Mexico suffered ten years of war, suffering,
and turmoil. Mexican leaders during 1910–1920 were unable to hold the country together and a revolution consumed the nation. The Mexican people
grew tired of political greed, lack of support, and unequal treatment. Several leaders such as President Diaz would prove to be a man of one interest,
himself. Others would quickly rise against him and attempt to claim the presidency. General Huerta and Francisco

Why Is Scott Van Winkle Important
Scott Van Winkle (MLA Format)
My Thesis is, the Mexican Revolution was important because the people were getting fed up and something needed to be done about the corruption
and the possibility of a free–market. This kind of "opportunity" would help the rich but the poor would only have a larger gap into the steps of
economical and political society. People were unsatisfied with the Diaz Regime and it had now effected much larger groups. Liberals and radicals
wanting democracy, owners of land not wanting foreign control, and people suffering for regulated pay and healthy working environments. Several
landowners lost their land to landowner takeovers.
"A call to arms by Francisco Madero, a leader of the prodemocracy forces, united the disparate groups opposed to Diaz which succeeded in
overthrowing the Porfirian government and forcing Diaz into exile" (Vanden & Prevost 319).
With Madero's efforts he was able to become president but was assassinated by a team put together by Victoriano Huerta. "TwoMexico's" was
addressed when the Revolution was sparked and taken control by Venustiano Carranzapart of the constitutionalist army and Emiliano Zapata which
whom will be under credited for their efforts in the future. They took Huerta out of power in 1914.
After the victory there was a split between the two revolution leaders due to differences in direction for Mexico. The Constitutionalist

How Was The Mexican Revolution Successful
Mexican Revolution
The Mexican Revolution of 1910 was an uprising against President Porfirio Diaz's dictatorship and against the many years of oppression from the elite
class on Mexico's indigenous and rural population. The revolution began as an attempt to overthrow President Diaz, but quickly turned into a social and
political uprising. However, the key question is, was the Mexican Revolution a success? In order to determine this, we must first examine the economic
backdrop of the 19th century prior to the revolution, the goals and objectives of the Revolution itself, as well as the conditions after the revolution.
Based off of readings on Mexico's history during these times frames, such as works by Carlos Contreras, Robert Miller, Gilbert joseph...show more
content...
In "Economic Policy in Mexico," Contreras notes the challenges Mexico faces in the early Republican of reestablishing a central authority. Contreras
states that the "presidency of Mexico changed 36 times from the 1820's to the middle of the 1850's, with the average tenure lasting only seven and a
half months" (4). The key factor for this was the division between the educated elite as either liberal or conservatives, as each group had their own
ideas and visions on how to structure the nation. For the first half of the 19th century, the control of the government shifted hands between these two
groups; and "upon taking power, the new group not only changed key government personal, it also rewrote laws and even the constitution to reflect its
philosophy" (Miler 203). The inconsistency in leadership and government policies lead to political instability until the rise of Porfirio Diaz, who ruled
from 1876–1911. Robert Miller's "The Age of Porfiro Diaz," provides a clear understanding of the political and economic polices during the
Porfiriato. President Diaz is seen as both the "Hero of America" and a harsh dictator who, at the expense of many made,

The Mexican Revolution Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

The Mexican Revolution Essay