SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 4
Running head: VPH-WS2.4 DROPBOX: CLASSICAL AND OPERANT CONDITIONING
Compare and Contrast the
Concepts of Classical and Operant Conditioning
Vanessa P Hebert
Dr. Theresa Veach
Nov 16, 2015
PSY-150
General Psychology
I have read and I understand the plagiarism policy as outlined in the syllabus and the sections in
the Student Catalog relating to the IWU Honesty/Cheating Policy. By affixing this statement to
the title page of my paper, I certify that I have not cheated or plagiarized in the process of
completing this assignment. If found that cheating and/or plagiarism did take place in the
writing of this paper, I understand the possible consequences of the act/s, which could include
expulsion from Indiana Wesleyan University.
Running head: VPH- WS2.4 COMPARE AND CONTRAST THEORIES
In the distance you hear the roar of a locomotive engine. Suddenly, bells start to clang
and flashing red lights are blinking so fast you cannot keep up with them. Out of nowhere, what
looks like two candy cane gauntlets appear on each side of the road before you. In our classic
conditioning, we expect to see a train soon. This train, I am thinking could not have chosen a
worse moment. I am late for a very important meeting. I do the unthinkable; I rush through the
crossing bars and I make. Just ahead of me there sits a patrolman, observing the whole thing.
Just as I think I have succeeded, he pulls me over; not only do I receive a citation-a lecture is
attached with it as well. What happened will likely never occur again in operant conditioning.
Learning is having a permanent change in behavior, or potential behavior that results
from experience (Nairne, 2014/2009, p. 205).Operant conditioning and Classical conditioning
are both components of Learning.
In our learning process, noticing and ignoring are both important. Why is this element of
learning important, it helps us identify a classical conditioned event; which allows us to prepare
for what is about to occur: producing an appropriate responses.
What is similar between classical conditioning and operant conditioning is that learning
takes place, a behavior is formed or identified and a memory function is involved.
In the process of becoming classical conditioned, you must have an (US) unconditioned
stimulus that produces an unconditioned response (UR) and (CS) conditioned stimulus, which is
a neutral stimulus that is paired with the unconditioned stimulus. For classical conditioning to
occur, a (CS) event must precede a normal event called unconditional stimuli in repeated
intervals. Repeated experiences with the (US) paired with a signal and a (CS): will produce what
is referred to as a conditioned response (CR) (Nairne, 2014/2009, p. 209). This process seems to
have greater focus on rewards and have a more positive focus.
Running head: VPH- WS2.4 COMPARE AND CONTRAST THEORIES
Another element of learning can be measured in results: the type of experience one
encounters or the connections we make about the end result of our behavior affect our learning
process.
Operant conditioning is the study of how organisms learn about the consequences of their own
voluntary actions (also called instructional conditioning). This theory seems to focus on our
consequences or punishments.
The differences between these learning theories are: one outcome has a result from a
natural occurring event or desire-from non-voluntary action or participation that occurs in a
repeated manner. Usually yielding rewards or designed to have positive result. Whereas, the
other event is a consequences or punishment of how he have performed in a voluntary behavior.
What translate over is that once classical conditioned it is very difficult to navigate away
from what your current level has yielded. There is an experiment with fleas. The fleas were put
in the jar with a lid; they jumped to the top hitting the lid. It was soon observed that they started
jumping just below the top. The lid was removed and they never jumped to the top again.
I know this feeling, that life does not always allow you to do what you are good at. How does
effort, motivation; while operating in a spirit of excellence translate into success for some and
not others?
Perhaps it is the law of effect, an element of operant behavior. These results will affect
the discriminative stimulus in this process. As we know needs or desires that are good should
produce positive reinforcement. When one behaves either positive or negatively, whichever is
appropriately categorized; if the consequences or punishment occur in a timely manner after of
the performance or display of behavior: learning will occur.
Running head: VPH- WS2.4 COMPARE AND CONTRAST THEORIES
References
Nairne, J. S. (2014/2009). Psychology (6th ed.). CA: Jon-David Hague.

More Related Content

Similar to VPH-WS24Dropbox-Classical and Operant Conditioning

Karma Or Dharma
Karma Or DharmaKarma Or Dharma
Karma Or Dharma
vitacentre
 
Chapter 3Perception, Attribution, and LearningA discerning e.docx
Chapter 3Perception, Attribution, and LearningA discerning e.docxChapter 3Perception, Attribution, and LearningA discerning e.docx
Chapter 3Perception, Attribution, and LearningA discerning e.docx
christinemaritza
 

Similar to VPH-WS24Dropbox-Classical and Operant Conditioning (6)

Learning.ppt
Learning.pptLearning.ppt
Learning.ppt
 
AP Chapter 6 Learning.ppt:Classical Conditioning, Operant Condition, Social C...
AP Chapter 6 Learning.ppt:Classical Conditioning, Operant Condition, Social C...AP Chapter 6 Learning.ppt:Classical Conditioning, Operant Condition, Social C...
AP Chapter 6 Learning.ppt:Classical Conditioning, Operant Condition, Social C...
 
Anxiety Management
Anxiety ManagementAnxiety Management
Anxiety Management
 
Karma Or Dharma
Karma Or DharmaKarma Or Dharma
Karma Or Dharma
 
Classical conditioning vs operant conditioning (2)
Classical conditioning vs operant conditioning (2)Classical conditioning vs operant conditioning (2)
Classical conditioning vs operant conditioning (2)
 
Chapter 3Perception, Attribution, and LearningA discerning e.docx
Chapter 3Perception, Attribution, and LearningA discerning e.docxChapter 3Perception, Attribution, and LearningA discerning e.docx
Chapter 3Perception, Attribution, and LearningA discerning e.docx
 

More from Vanessa Prejean Hebert (6)

V.P.Hebert:Turnitin-Pisco Model-Leading Change in the World
V.P.Hebert:Turnitin-Pisco Model-Leading Change in the WorldV.P.Hebert:Turnitin-Pisco Model-Leading Change in the World
V.P.Hebert:Turnitin-Pisco Model-Leading Change in the World
 
VPH-WS5.4 DropBox-Social Roles
VPH-WS5.4 DropBox-Social RolesVPH-WS5.4 DropBox-Social Roles
VPH-WS5.4 DropBox-Social Roles
 
VPHebert-WS5.5-FINAL PAPER-HYDROSPHERE and GLOBAL OCEAN
VPHebert-WS5.5-FINAL PAPER-HYDROSPHERE and GLOBAL OCEANVPHebert-WS5.5-FINAL PAPER-HYDROSPHERE and GLOBAL OCEAN
VPHebert-WS5.5-FINAL PAPER-HYDROSPHERE and GLOBAL OCEAN
 
VPH-WS3.5 Dropbox-Happiness
VPH-WS3.5 Dropbox-HappinessVPH-WS3.5 Dropbox-Happiness
VPH-WS3.5 Dropbox-Happiness
 
WS1.5 VPH-DropBox-Morality
WS1.5 VPH-DropBox-MoralityWS1.5 VPH-DropBox-Morality
WS1.5 VPH-DropBox-Morality
 
VPH-n.p.s User Friendly SOP LF Instructions2009-1
VPH-n.p.s User Friendly SOP LF Instructions2009-1VPH-n.p.s User Friendly SOP LF Instructions2009-1
VPH-n.p.s User Friendly SOP LF Instructions2009-1
 

VPH-WS24Dropbox-Classical and Operant Conditioning

  • 1. Running head: VPH-WS2.4 DROPBOX: CLASSICAL AND OPERANT CONDITIONING Compare and Contrast the Concepts of Classical and Operant Conditioning Vanessa P Hebert Dr. Theresa Veach Nov 16, 2015 PSY-150 General Psychology I have read and I understand the plagiarism policy as outlined in the syllabus and the sections in the Student Catalog relating to the IWU Honesty/Cheating Policy. By affixing this statement to the title page of my paper, I certify that I have not cheated or plagiarized in the process of completing this assignment. If found that cheating and/or plagiarism did take place in the writing of this paper, I understand the possible consequences of the act/s, which could include expulsion from Indiana Wesleyan University.
  • 2. Running head: VPH- WS2.4 COMPARE AND CONTRAST THEORIES In the distance you hear the roar of a locomotive engine. Suddenly, bells start to clang and flashing red lights are blinking so fast you cannot keep up with them. Out of nowhere, what looks like two candy cane gauntlets appear on each side of the road before you. In our classic conditioning, we expect to see a train soon. This train, I am thinking could not have chosen a worse moment. I am late for a very important meeting. I do the unthinkable; I rush through the crossing bars and I make. Just ahead of me there sits a patrolman, observing the whole thing. Just as I think I have succeeded, he pulls me over; not only do I receive a citation-a lecture is attached with it as well. What happened will likely never occur again in operant conditioning. Learning is having a permanent change in behavior, or potential behavior that results from experience (Nairne, 2014/2009, p. 205).Operant conditioning and Classical conditioning are both components of Learning. In our learning process, noticing and ignoring are both important. Why is this element of learning important, it helps us identify a classical conditioned event; which allows us to prepare for what is about to occur: producing an appropriate responses. What is similar between classical conditioning and operant conditioning is that learning takes place, a behavior is formed or identified and a memory function is involved. In the process of becoming classical conditioned, you must have an (US) unconditioned stimulus that produces an unconditioned response (UR) and (CS) conditioned stimulus, which is a neutral stimulus that is paired with the unconditioned stimulus. For classical conditioning to occur, a (CS) event must precede a normal event called unconditional stimuli in repeated intervals. Repeated experiences with the (US) paired with a signal and a (CS): will produce what is referred to as a conditioned response (CR) (Nairne, 2014/2009, p. 209). This process seems to have greater focus on rewards and have a more positive focus.
  • 3. Running head: VPH- WS2.4 COMPARE AND CONTRAST THEORIES Another element of learning can be measured in results: the type of experience one encounters or the connections we make about the end result of our behavior affect our learning process. Operant conditioning is the study of how organisms learn about the consequences of their own voluntary actions (also called instructional conditioning). This theory seems to focus on our consequences or punishments. The differences between these learning theories are: one outcome has a result from a natural occurring event or desire-from non-voluntary action or participation that occurs in a repeated manner. Usually yielding rewards or designed to have positive result. Whereas, the other event is a consequences or punishment of how he have performed in a voluntary behavior. What translate over is that once classical conditioned it is very difficult to navigate away from what your current level has yielded. There is an experiment with fleas. The fleas were put in the jar with a lid; they jumped to the top hitting the lid. It was soon observed that they started jumping just below the top. The lid was removed and they never jumped to the top again. I know this feeling, that life does not always allow you to do what you are good at. How does effort, motivation; while operating in a spirit of excellence translate into success for some and not others? Perhaps it is the law of effect, an element of operant behavior. These results will affect the discriminative stimulus in this process. As we know needs or desires that are good should produce positive reinforcement. When one behaves either positive or negatively, whichever is appropriately categorized; if the consequences or punishment occur in a timely manner after of the performance or display of behavior: learning will occur.
  • 4. Running head: VPH- WS2.4 COMPARE AND CONTRAST THEORIES References Nairne, J. S. (2014/2009). Psychology (6th ed.). CA: Jon-David Hague.