Essay Rubric
Criteria Rating Points
Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Does Not Meet Expectations
Organization & Structure
Introduction
Thesis position is clearly stated,
adequately describes the structure
of the essay, and invites reader's
attention.
(18-20)
Some weakness related to the
presentation of structure of the
essay.
(15-17)
No attempt is made to state the
thesis or position is vagu, and/or
there is no description the
structure of the essay.
(0-14)
20
Body
Body includes strong and relevant
supporting details that logically
align with the position of the
author. Essay body is logically
sequenced and cohesive with the
essay thesis. Each body paragraph
presents complete ideas/
supporting details.
(36-40)
Body includes relevant supporting
details that logically align with the
position of the author. Some
weakness in logic, organization, or
paragraph structure.
(30-35)
Body fails to include relevant
supporting details with the
author’s position. Essay body lacks
coherence and does not align with
the essay thesis. Body paragraphs
present incomplete and/or
incoherent ideas/supporting
details. Position is difficult to
articulate.
(1-29)
40
Grammar and Usage
Essay is free of grammatical and
spelling errors. Technical
terminology, words from other
languages, and words from other
historical periods are explained and
used correctly. Sentences are clearly
written and free of run-ons. Reader
is able to fully comprehend the
meaning of the narrative.
(27-30)
Essay contains a few minor
grammatical and/or spelling
errors. Paragraphs contain minor
errors such as word misusage, run-
on sentences, and wordy
sentences. Sentences are generally
clearly written. Contains no more
than a few minor errors, which do
not adversely affect the reader’s
ability to understand the essay.
(22-26)
Paper contains numerous
grammatical and spelling errors,
and misused words. Paragraphs
are wordy, contain multiple run-on
sentences, and are unclear.
Reader has a difficult time
understanding the essay because
of errors and poor sentence
structure.
(0-21)
30
Conclusion
Conclusion clearly and effectively
summarizes main points mentioned
in the essay body, presents new
information to the reader, and
closes with supporting details
mentioned in the essay body.
(9-10)
Some weakness in summarizing
main points of essay and/or there
is presentation of new material.
(7-8)
Conclusion is vague, does not
summarize topics mentioned in
the essay body, does not present
new information to the reader,
and/or fails to effectively close the
essay with supporting details from
the essay body.
(0-7)
10
Content Quality
Research Sources
Presents a variety of reputable and
relevant sources to support author’s
position. Cites all sources of
information referred to in essay. All
sourc ...
5/25/2020 Rubric Detail – 31228.202030
https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_843783_1&course_i… 1/4
Rubric Detail
A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item
and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Show Descriptions Show Feedback
Name: ITS836 (8 Week) Research Paper Rubric
Description: Please use this rubric for grading research papers
Exit
Grid View List View
No requirements are met
Includes a few of the required components as speci�ed in the assignment.
Includes some of the required components as speci�ed in the assignment.
Includes most of the required components as speci�ed in the assignment.
Includes all of the required components as speci�ed in the assignment.
Requirements
--
No Evidence 0 (0.00%) points
Limited Evidence 3 (3.00%) points
Below Expectations 7 (7.00%) points
Approaches Expectations 11 (11.00%) points
Meets Expectations 15 (15.00%) points
Fails to provide enough content to show a demonstration of knowledge
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
Some signi�cant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
A few errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge
from the readings and sources.
Content
--
No Evidence 0 (0.00%) points
Limited Evidence 3 (3.00%) points
Below Expectations 7 (7.00%) points
Approaches Expectations 11 (11.00%) points
Meets Expectations 15 (15.00%) points
5/25/2020 Rubric Detail – 31228.202030
https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_843783_1&course_i… 2/4
g
Fails to provide a critical thinking analysis and interpretation
Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
Some signi�cant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
A few errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.
Critical Analysis
--
No Evidence 0 (0.00%) points
Limited Evidence 5 (5.00%) points
Below Expectations 10 (10.00%) points
Approaches Expectations 15 (15.00%) points
Meets Expectations 20 (20.00%) points
Fails to demonstrate problem solving.
Major errors or omissions in problem solving.
Some signi�cant but not major errors or omissions in problem solving.
A few errors or omissions in problem solving.
Demonstrates strong or adequate thought and insight in problem solving.
Problem Solving
--
No Evidence 0 (0.00%) points
Limited Evidence 5 (5.00%) points
Below Expectations 10 (10.00%) points
Approaches Expectations 15 (15.00%) points
Meets Expectations 20 (20.00%) points
Source or example selection and integration of knowledge.
( 0.00 0.50) Selects an Existing or Hypothetical Human Services SilvaGraf83
( 0.00 / 0.50) Selects an Existing or Hypothetical Human Services Organization/Agency Program
Below Expectations - N/A
( 0.32 / 0.50) Compiles a Proposal that Develops, Evaluates, or Modifies the Hypothetical Implementation of this Change in a Real-World Setting
Below Expectations - Attempts to compile a proposal that develops, evaluates, or modifies the hypothetical implementation of this change in a real-world setting; however, significant details are missing.
( 0.32 / 0.50) Describes the Process for Determining the Need for the New Program, the Evaluation, or the Modification of this Program
Below Expectations - Attempts to describe the process for determining the need for the new program, the evaluation, or the modification of this program; however, significant details are missing.
( 0.22 / 0.50) Explains the Proposed
Solution
to the Problem, Gap, or Need for this Hypothetical Proposal
Below Expectations - Attempts to explain the proposed solution to the problem, gap, or need for this hypothetical proposal; however, the explanation is significantly underdeveloped.
( 0.00 / 0.50) Selects a Qualitative, Quantitative, or Mixed Methods Design for the Proposal
Non-Performance - The selection of a qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods design for the proposal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
( 0.00 / 0.50) Explains Why this Methodology and Design is Most Appropriate for the Proposed Change
Non-Performance - The explanation of why this methodology and design is most appropriate for the proposed change is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
( 0.00 / 0.50) Creates a Hypothetical Research Proposal to a Grant Funding Organization or an Organization Where the Evaluation of Programs is Part of the Job Description
Non-Performance - The hypothetical research proposal to a grant funding organization where the evaluation of programs is part of the job description is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
( 0.00 / 0.50) Addresses the Problem that was Identified, Including the Evidence that Supports this Problem
Non-Performance - The problem that was identified, including the evidence that supports this problem is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
( 0.46 / 0.75) Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.
( 0.88 / 1.00) Written Communication: APA Formatting
Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.
( 0.22 / 0.25) Written Communication: Page Requirement
Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
( 1.76 / 2.00) Written Communicat ...
( 0.00 0.50) Selects an Existing or Hypothetical Human Services SilvaGraf83
( 0.00 / 0.50) Selects an Existing or Hypothetical Human Services Organization/Agency Program
Below Expectations - N/A
( 0.32 / 0.50) Compiles a Proposal that Develops, Evaluates, or Modifies the Hypothetical Implementation of this Change in a Real-World Setting
Below Expectations - Attempts to compile a proposal that develops, evaluates, or modifies the hypothetical implementation of this change in a real-world setting; however, significant details are missing.
( 0.32 / 0.50) Describes the Process for Determining the Need for the New Program, the Evaluation, or the Modification of this Program
Below Expectations - Attempts to describe the process for determining the need for the new program, the evaluation, or the modification of this program; however, significant details are missing.
( 0.22 / 0.50) Explains the Proposed
Solution
to the Problem, Gap, or Need for this Hypothetical Proposal
Below Expectations - Attempts to explain the proposed solution to the problem, gap, or need for this hypothetical proposal; however, the explanation is significantly underdeveloped.
( 0.00 / 0.50) Selects a Qualitative, Quantitative, or Mixed Methods Design for the Proposal
Non-Performance - The selection of a qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods design for the proposal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
( 0.00 / 0.50) Explains Why this Methodology and Design is Most Appropriate for the Proposed Change
Non-Performance - The explanation of why this methodology and design is most appropriate for the proposed change is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
( 0.00 / 0.50) Creates a Hypothetical Research Proposal to a Grant Funding Organization or an Organization Where the Evaluation of Programs is Part of the Job Description
Non-Performance - The hypothetical research proposal to a grant funding organization where the evaluation of programs is part of the job description is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
( 0.00 / 0.50) Addresses the Problem that was Identified, Including the Evidence that Supports this Problem
Non-Performance - The problem that was identified, including the evidence that supports this problem is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
( 0.46 / 0.75) Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.
( 0.88 / 1.00) Written Communication: APA Formatting
Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.
( 0.22 / 0.25) Written Communication: Page Requirement
Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
( 1.76 / 2.00) Written Communicat ...
( 0.00 0.50) Selects an Existing or Hypothetical Human Services MoseStaton39
( 0.00 / 0.50) Selects an Existing or Hypothetical Human Services Organization/Agency Program
Below Expectations - N/A
( 0.32 / 0.50) Compiles a Proposal that Develops, Evaluates, or Modifies the Hypothetical Implementation of this Change in a Real-World Setting
Below Expectations - Attempts to compile a proposal that develops, evaluates, or modifies the hypothetical implementation of this change in a real-world setting; however, significant details are missing.
( 0.32 / 0.50) Describes the Process for Determining the Need for the New Program, the Evaluation, or the Modification of this Program
Below Expectations - Attempts to describe the process for determining the need for the new program, the evaluation, or the modification of this program; however, significant details are missing.
( 0.22 / 0.50) Explains the Proposed
Solution
to the Problem, Gap, or Need for this Hypothetical Proposal
Below Expectations - Attempts to explain the proposed solution to the problem, gap, or need for this hypothetical proposal; however, the explanation is significantly underdeveloped.
( 0.00 / 0.50) Selects a Qualitative, Quantitative, or Mixed Methods Design for the Proposal
Non-Performance - The selection of a qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods design for the proposal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
( 0.00 / 0.50) Explains Why this Methodology and Design is Most Appropriate for the Proposed Change
Non-Performance - The explanation of why this methodology and design is most appropriate for the proposed change is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
( 0.00 / 0.50) Creates a Hypothetical Research Proposal to a Grant Funding Organization or an Organization Where the Evaluation of Programs is Part of the Job Description
Non-Performance - The hypothetical research proposal to a grant funding organization where the evaluation of programs is part of the job description is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
( 0.00 / 0.50) Addresses the Problem that was Identified, Including the Evidence that Supports this Problem
Non-Performance - The problem that was identified, including the evidence that supports this problem is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
( 0.46 / 0.75) Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.
( 0.88 / 1.00) Written Communication: APA Formatting
Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.
( 0.22 / 0.25) Written Communication: Page Requirement
Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
( 1.76 / 2.00) Written Communicat ...
1. Statement of the Project Write a clear statement of the proj.docxjackiewalcutt
1. Statement of the Project: Write a clear statement of the project and the basis for it being addressed.
1. Begin with a clear declarative statement, such as "It is not known how and to what degree or extent. . . ."
2.Describe the general problem.
3.Identify the need for the study and explain why it is of concern to the stakeholders r community members.
4.Tell the reader what needs to be discovered, or explain what is wrong that needs to be fixed.
5.Answer these questions: What do we not know? What is the need we are trying to address? Do we need more research? Do we need to increase our understanding of the problem? Do we need to find ways to solve it?
6.Clearly describe the magnitude and importance of the problem.
2. Contribution to Society: Describe how your project will contribute to society.
3. Need for Change: Present the empirical basis and related evidence that there is a need for change (include the relevant literature from your annotated bibliography).
4.Theoretical Foundation: Describe the theory or theories, including assumptions, that serve as the backbone of your project (include references for theories cited).
1.Establishes the foundation and structure of your study that can hold or support a theory of a research work.
2.Explains why the problem under investigation exists.
3.Cites the major references in support of the theory that is applied or developed in the study.
4.Describes how this study aligns or fits with other research in the field using the same theory.
5.Describes the development of the research questions and/or objectives.
5.Investigator Position (Action Researcher's Role): Provide an explanation of your role as an action researcher (insider or outsider).
6.Research Questions and/or Goals and Objectives of Your Project: Provide a clear statement of the research questions to be answered or the specific project objectives to be achieved.
7.Action Plan (Action Research Methods): Apply the Look, Think, Act Model to explain how your project will be conducted (what are the steps you will follow in implementing this project?).
8.Dissemination Plan: Describe your plan for disseminating the results of your project.
9.Action Research Data-Collection Methods: Describe the methods you will use to collect the data. This includes questionnaires, formal interview protocols, and measurement tools established in the literature.
10.Assumptions: Identify the key assumptions of the proposed project.
11.Limitations: Evaluate the weaknesses of your project at this time.
12.Summary: Explain how your project meets the criteria ("hallmarks") of a good action research project.
13.Bibliography
Project Objectives
To successfully complete this project, you will be expected to: 1.Articulate the focus of an action research project and its significance to the health care field.
2.Describe a current practice or intervention that an action research project addresses.
3.Present the empirical basis and provide related evidence that supports the ...
Top of FormBottom of FormEnterprise Architecture Enables Proce.docxedwardmarivel
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Enterprise Architecture Enables Processes Paper
Purpose of this Assignment
This assignment gives you the opportunity to apply your critical thinking skills and understanding of the course concepts to explain how the enterprise architecture (EA) and/or the EA program supports the other IT management processes of an organization. This assignment specifically addresses the following course outcomes:
· describe enterprise architecture (EA), the appropriate application of EA frameworks, and an overall ongoing EA program
· analyze and examine how enterprise architecture and enterprise systems influence, support, and enable an organization's ability to contribute to strategic decision making and to respond and adapt to the business environment
· apply EA concepts to support business requirements and identify opportunities for enterprise solutions
Assignment
As you have learned throughout the course, EAs can be used to support a wide variety of information technology management processes, and an EA program strengthens IT management activities. A well-defined and implemented EA contributes significantly to each of the phases of the systems development life cycle (SDLC). For this assignment you will write a 3-5 page paper (not counting any cover sheet or reference pages) that explains briefly what enterprise architecture (EA) is and then how it supplements and enables each of the phases of the SDLC:
· initiation/planning/concept phase
· requirements analysis phase
· design phase
· development phase
· integration and testing phase
· implementation/deployment/support/maintenance phase
You should explain how EA enables each phase, how it fits into each phase, and what unique qualities or capabilities a well-defined EA contributes that might not otherwise be available to the organization.
The use of at least two external scholarly resources (other than class materials) is required. (NOTE: More than two external resources are required to receive all possible points; see Grading Rubric below.) You should use scholarly journals (rather than Wikipedia and author-less website postings). If you need assistance with determining what a scholarly journal is, the UMUC library is a very good source of information, accessed via the following link: http://www.umuc.edu/library/libhow/articles.cfm. Remember to correctly cite and reference all sources using APA format.
Submit your paper in Word format via your Assignments Folder as an attached document with your last name included in the filename.
Grading Rubric
Use the rubric below to be sure you have covered all aspects of the assignment.Criteria
90-100%
Far Above Standards
80-89%
Above Standards
70-79%
Meets Standards
60-69%
Below Standards
< 60%
Well Below Standards
Possible Points
Intro-duction
5 Points
A sophisticated introduction sets the stage for the paper.
4 Points
A well-written introduction sets the stage for the paper.
3.5 Points
The introduction adequately sets the stage ...
RubricDiscussion of Which Employees May Need Coaching and Which .docxjoellemurphey
Rubric
Discussion of Which Employees May Need Coaching and Which Are Performing at Acceptable Levels
No discussion of which employees may need coaching and which are performing at acceptable levels is presented.
A discussion of which employees may need coaching and which are performing at acceptable levels is presented, but the discussion is not connected to the data given.
A cursory discussion of which employees may need coaching and which are performing at acceptable levels is presented. The discussion is loosely connected to the data given.
A thorough discussion of which employees may need coaching and which are performing at acceptable levels is presented. The discussion connects reasonably to the data given.
A thorough discussion of which employees may need coaching and which are performing at acceptable levels is presented. The discussion is clearly, logically, and directly connected to the data given.
25.0 %Explanation of Which Principles of Consulting and Coaching Would most Effectively be Applied to Improve Organizational Performance Benchmarks C 4.3: Apply principles of interpersonal and group consulting and coaching to improve organizational performance.
No explanation of which principles of consulting and coaching would most effectively be applied to improve organizational performance is presented.
A vague explanation of which principles of consulting and coaching would most effectively be applied to improve organizational performance is presented, but information presented is not based on scholarly sources.
A cursory explanation of which principles of consulting and coaching would most effectively be applied to improve organizational performance is presented. Information presented is from both non-scholarly and scholarly sources.
A thorough explanation of which principles of consulting and coaching would most effectively be applied to improve organizational performance is presented. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
A thorough explanation of which principles of consulting and coaching would most effectively be applied to improve organizational performance is presented. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
15.0 %Regression Equation and Justification of Hiring Decision
No regression equation and justification of hiring decision are presented.
The regression is not clearly visible. A vague justification of hiring decision is presented, but information presented is not based on scholarly sources.
The regression equation is clearly stated. A cursory justification of hiring decision is presented. Information presented is from both non-scholarly and scholarly sources.
The regression equation is clearly stated. A thorough justification of hiring decision is presented. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
The regression equation is clearly stated. A thorough and insightful and justification of hiring decision is presented. Information presented is from current schola ...
OverviewThis course includes three Article Analyses. These.docxalfred4lewis58146
Overview
This course includes three Article Analyses. These exercises are designed to actively involve you in HR considerations and decision making, and help you understand how the concepts covered in the course apply to complex real-world situations. These exercises also provide practice communicating your reasoning in a professional manner.
3-3 Module Three HR Article Analysis: Crisis Management
Students will demonstrate their knowledge of HR’s role in and influence on legal and environmental risk mitigation, as well as the integration of ethical practices.
Read the article:
“Crisis Management: Prevention, Diagnosis and Intervention” by Toby J. Kash and John R. Darling (SNHU Library online) http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.snhu.edu/docview/226915167
Write a 3- to 5-page analysis (approximately 3,000 words) on the companies in the assigned case study. In your analysis, do the following:
a. Briefly summarize the article (1-3 paragraphs).
b. Identify 3 different companies in the article.
a. Discuss whether the risk management approach taken by each company was a preventive or intervention measure.
b. Consider whether or not the risks change when events are addressed in a proactive manner instead of a reactive manner. Explain your reasoning.
c. Compare the different types of leadership approaches, and suggest how an HR department might implement strategies to mitigate risk or manage a crisis event.
d. Discuss ethical ways for mitigating risks with key stakeholders, considering practical implications to executive leaders.
Guidelines
The article analysis must follow these formatting guidelines: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and APA citations. Page length requirements: 3-5 pages, not including cover page and references. Failure to adhere to these requirements of submission will result in the project not being graded.
Rubric for Article Analysis One/Module Three
Critical Elements
Exemplary
Proficient
Needs Improvement
Not Evident
Value
Summary of the article
N/A
Includes a brief summary of the article
(10)
N/A
Does not include a summary of the article
(0)
5
3 different companies
Identifies 3 different companies in the article
(10)
Identifies 1 or 2 different companies in the article
(9-5)
Does not identify any companies in the article
(0)
5
Preventive or intervention
Submission meets “Proficient” and extends explanation to include supporting evidence from scholarly resources
(10)
Evaluates whether the risk management approach was a preventive or intervention measure and clearly explains why
(9-7)
Evaluates whether the risk management approach was a preventive or intervention measure, but is not correct, or does not clearly explain why
(6-4)
Does not evaluate whether the risk management approach was a preventive or intervention measure
(0)
10
Explain whether risks change when addressed proactively as opposed to reactively
Submission meets “Proficient” and provides illustrative examples
(15)
Explains cl.
5/25/2020 Rubric Detail – 31228.202030
https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_843783_1&course_i… 1/4
Rubric Detail
A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item
and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Show Descriptions Show Feedback
Name: ITS836 (8 Week) Research Paper Rubric
Description: Please use this rubric for grading research papers
Exit
Grid View List View
No requirements are met
Includes a few of the required components as speci�ed in the assignment.
Includes some of the required components as speci�ed in the assignment.
Includes most of the required components as speci�ed in the assignment.
Includes all of the required components as speci�ed in the assignment.
Requirements
--
No Evidence 0 (0.00%) points
Limited Evidence 3 (3.00%) points
Below Expectations 7 (7.00%) points
Approaches Expectations 11 (11.00%) points
Meets Expectations 15 (15.00%) points
Fails to provide enough content to show a demonstration of knowledge
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
Some signi�cant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
A few errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge
from the readings and sources.
Content
--
No Evidence 0 (0.00%) points
Limited Evidence 3 (3.00%) points
Below Expectations 7 (7.00%) points
Approaches Expectations 11 (11.00%) points
Meets Expectations 15 (15.00%) points
5/25/2020 Rubric Detail – 31228.202030
https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_843783_1&course_i… 2/4
g
Fails to provide a critical thinking analysis and interpretation
Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
Some signi�cant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
A few errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.
Critical Analysis
--
No Evidence 0 (0.00%) points
Limited Evidence 5 (5.00%) points
Below Expectations 10 (10.00%) points
Approaches Expectations 15 (15.00%) points
Meets Expectations 20 (20.00%) points
Fails to demonstrate problem solving.
Major errors or omissions in problem solving.
Some signi�cant but not major errors or omissions in problem solving.
A few errors or omissions in problem solving.
Demonstrates strong or adequate thought and insight in problem solving.
Problem Solving
--
No Evidence 0 (0.00%) points
Limited Evidence 5 (5.00%) points
Below Expectations 10 (10.00%) points
Approaches Expectations 15 (15.00%) points
Meets Expectations 20 (20.00%) points
Source or example selection and integration of knowledge.
( 0.00 0.50) Selects an Existing or Hypothetical Human Services SilvaGraf83
( 0.00 / 0.50) Selects an Existing or Hypothetical Human Services Organization/Agency Program
Below Expectations - N/A
( 0.32 / 0.50) Compiles a Proposal that Develops, Evaluates, or Modifies the Hypothetical Implementation of this Change in a Real-World Setting
Below Expectations - Attempts to compile a proposal that develops, evaluates, or modifies the hypothetical implementation of this change in a real-world setting; however, significant details are missing.
( 0.32 / 0.50) Describes the Process for Determining the Need for the New Program, the Evaluation, or the Modification of this Program
Below Expectations - Attempts to describe the process for determining the need for the new program, the evaluation, or the modification of this program; however, significant details are missing.
( 0.22 / 0.50) Explains the Proposed
Solution
to the Problem, Gap, or Need for this Hypothetical Proposal
Below Expectations - Attempts to explain the proposed solution to the problem, gap, or need for this hypothetical proposal; however, the explanation is significantly underdeveloped.
( 0.00 / 0.50) Selects a Qualitative, Quantitative, or Mixed Methods Design for the Proposal
Non-Performance - The selection of a qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods design for the proposal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
( 0.00 / 0.50) Explains Why this Methodology and Design is Most Appropriate for the Proposed Change
Non-Performance - The explanation of why this methodology and design is most appropriate for the proposed change is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
( 0.00 / 0.50) Creates a Hypothetical Research Proposal to a Grant Funding Organization or an Organization Where the Evaluation of Programs is Part of the Job Description
Non-Performance - The hypothetical research proposal to a grant funding organization where the evaluation of programs is part of the job description is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
( 0.00 / 0.50) Addresses the Problem that was Identified, Including the Evidence that Supports this Problem
Non-Performance - The problem that was identified, including the evidence that supports this problem is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
( 0.46 / 0.75) Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.
( 0.88 / 1.00) Written Communication: APA Formatting
Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.
( 0.22 / 0.25) Written Communication: Page Requirement
Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
( 1.76 / 2.00) Written Communicat ...
( 0.00 0.50) Selects an Existing or Hypothetical Human Services SilvaGraf83
( 0.00 / 0.50) Selects an Existing or Hypothetical Human Services Organization/Agency Program
Below Expectations - N/A
( 0.32 / 0.50) Compiles a Proposal that Develops, Evaluates, or Modifies the Hypothetical Implementation of this Change in a Real-World Setting
Below Expectations - Attempts to compile a proposal that develops, evaluates, or modifies the hypothetical implementation of this change in a real-world setting; however, significant details are missing.
( 0.32 / 0.50) Describes the Process for Determining the Need for the New Program, the Evaluation, or the Modification of this Program
Below Expectations - Attempts to describe the process for determining the need for the new program, the evaluation, or the modification of this program; however, significant details are missing.
( 0.22 / 0.50) Explains the Proposed
Solution
to the Problem, Gap, or Need for this Hypothetical Proposal
Below Expectations - Attempts to explain the proposed solution to the problem, gap, or need for this hypothetical proposal; however, the explanation is significantly underdeveloped.
( 0.00 / 0.50) Selects a Qualitative, Quantitative, or Mixed Methods Design for the Proposal
Non-Performance - The selection of a qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods design for the proposal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
( 0.00 / 0.50) Explains Why this Methodology and Design is Most Appropriate for the Proposed Change
Non-Performance - The explanation of why this methodology and design is most appropriate for the proposed change is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
( 0.00 / 0.50) Creates a Hypothetical Research Proposal to a Grant Funding Organization or an Organization Where the Evaluation of Programs is Part of the Job Description
Non-Performance - The hypothetical research proposal to a grant funding organization where the evaluation of programs is part of the job description is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
( 0.00 / 0.50) Addresses the Problem that was Identified, Including the Evidence that Supports this Problem
Non-Performance - The problem that was identified, including the evidence that supports this problem is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
( 0.46 / 0.75) Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.
( 0.88 / 1.00) Written Communication: APA Formatting
Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.
( 0.22 / 0.25) Written Communication: Page Requirement
Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
( 1.76 / 2.00) Written Communicat ...
( 0.00 0.50) Selects an Existing or Hypothetical Human Services MoseStaton39
( 0.00 / 0.50) Selects an Existing or Hypothetical Human Services Organization/Agency Program
Below Expectations - N/A
( 0.32 / 0.50) Compiles a Proposal that Develops, Evaluates, or Modifies the Hypothetical Implementation of this Change in a Real-World Setting
Below Expectations - Attempts to compile a proposal that develops, evaluates, or modifies the hypothetical implementation of this change in a real-world setting; however, significant details are missing.
( 0.32 / 0.50) Describes the Process for Determining the Need for the New Program, the Evaluation, or the Modification of this Program
Below Expectations - Attempts to describe the process for determining the need for the new program, the evaluation, or the modification of this program; however, significant details are missing.
( 0.22 / 0.50) Explains the Proposed
Solution
to the Problem, Gap, or Need for this Hypothetical Proposal
Below Expectations - Attempts to explain the proposed solution to the problem, gap, or need for this hypothetical proposal; however, the explanation is significantly underdeveloped.
( 0.00 / 0.50) Selects a Qualitative, Quantitative, or Mixed Methods Design for the Proposal
Non-Performance - The selection of a qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods design for the proposal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
( 0.00 / 0.50) Explains Why this Methodology and Design is Most Appropriate for the Proposed Change
Non-Performance - The explanation of why this methodology and design is most appropriate for the proposed change is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
( 0.00 / 0.50) Creates a Hypothetical Research Proposal to a Grant Funding Organization or an Organization Where the Evaluation of Programs is Part of the Job Description
Non-Performance - The hypothetical research proposal to a grant funding organization where the evaluation of programs is part of the job description is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
( 0.00 / 0.50) Addresses the Problem that was Identified, Including the Evidence that Supports this Problem
Non-Performance - The problem that was identified, including the evidence that supports this problem is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
( 0.46 / 0.75) Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.
( 0.88 / 1.00) Written Communication: APA Formatting
Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.
( 0.22 / 0.25) Written Communication: Page Requirement
Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
( 1.76 / 2.00) Written Communicat ...
1. Statement of the Project Write a clear statement of the proj.docxjackiewalcutt
1. Statement of the Project: Write a clear statement of the project and the basis for it being addressed.
1. Begin with a clear declarative statement, such as "It is not known how and to what degree or extent. . . ."
2.Describe the general problem.
3.Identify the need for the study and explain why it is of concern to the stakeholders r community members.
4.Tell the reader what needs to be discovered, or explain what is wrong that needs to be fixed.
5.Answer these questions: What do we not know? What is the need we are trying to address? Do we need more research? Do we need to increase our understanding of the problem? Do we need to find ways to solve it?
6.Clearly describe the magnitude and importance of the problem.
2. Contribution to Society: Describe how your project will contribute to society.
3. Need for Change: Present the empirical basis and related evidence that there is a need for change (include the relevant literature from your annotated bibliography).
4.Theoretical Foundation: Describe the theory or theories, including assumptions, that serve as the backbone of your project (include references for theories cited).
1.Establishes the foundation and structure of your study that can hold or support a theory of a research work.
2.Explains why the problem under investigation exists.
3.Cites the major references in support of the theory that is applied or developed in the study.
4.Describes how this study aligns or fits with other research in the field using the same theory.
5.Describes the development of the research questions and/or objectives.
5.Investigator Position (Action Researcher's Role): Provide an explanation of your role as an action researcher (insider or outsider).
6.Research Questions and/or Goals and Objectives of Your Project: Provide a clear statement of the research questions to be answered or the specific project objectives to be achieved.
7.Action Plan (Action Research Methods): Apply the Look, Think, Act Model to explain how your project will be conducted (what are the steps you will follow in implementing this project?).
8.Dissemination Plan: Describe your plan for disseminating the results of your project.
9.Action Research Data-Collection Methods: Describe the methods you will use to collect the data. This includes questionnaires, formal interview protocols, and measurement tools established in the literature.
10.Assumptions: Identify the key assumptions of the proposed project.
11.Limitations: Evaluate the weaknesses of your project at this time.
12.Summary: Explain how your project meets the criteria ("hallmarks") of a good action research project.
13.Bibliography
Project Objectives
To successfully complete this project, you will be expected to: 1.Articulate the focus of an action research project and its significance to the health care field.
2.Describe a current practice or intervention that an action research project addresses.
3.Present the empirical basis and provide related evidence that supports the ...
Top of FormBottom of FormEnterprise Architecture Enables Proce.docxedwardmarivel
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Enterprise Architecture Enables Processes Paper
Purpose of this Assignment
This assignment gives you the opportunity to apply your critical thinking skills and understanding of the course concepts to explain how the enterprise architecture (EA) and/or the EA program supports the other IT management processes of an organization. This assignment specifically addresses the following course outcomes:
· describe enterprise architecture (EA), the appropriate application of EA frameworks, and an overall ongoing EA program
· analyze and examine how enterprise architecture and enterprise systems influence, support, and enable an organization's ability to contribute to strategic decision making and to respond and adapt to the business environment
· apply EA concepts to support business requirements and identify opportunities for enterprise solutions
Assignment
As you have learned throughout the course, EAs can be used to support a wide variety of information technology management processes, and an EA program strengthens IT management activities. A well-defined and implemented EA contributes significantly to each of the phases of the systems development life cycle (SDLC). For this assignment you will write a 3-5 page paper (not counting any cover sheet or reference pages) that explains briefly what enterprise architecture (EA) is and then how it supplements and enables each of the phases of the SDLC:
· initiation/planning/concept phase
· requirements analysis phase
· design phase
· development phase
· integration and testing phase
· implementation/deployment/support/maintenance phase
You should explain how EA enables each phase, how it fits into each phase, and what unique qualities or capabilities a well-defined EA contributes that might not otherwise be available to the organization.
The use of at least two external scholarly resources (other than class materials) is required. (NOTE: More than two external resources are required to receive all possible points; see Grading Rubric below.) You should use scholarly journals (rather than Wikipedia and author-less website postings). If you need assistance with determining what a scholarly journal is, the UMUC library is a very good source of information, accessed via the following link: http://www.umuc.edu/library/libhow/articles.cfm. Remember to correctly cite and reference all sources using APA format.
Submit your paper in Word format via your Assignments Folder as an attached document with your last name included in the filename.
Grading Rubric
Use the rubric below to be sure you have covered all aspects of the assignment.Criteria
90-100%
Far Above Standards
80-89%
Above Standards
70-79%
Meets Standards
60-69%
Below Standards
< 60%
Well Below Standards
Possible Points
Intro-duction
5 Points
A sophisticated introduction sets the stage for the paper.
4 Points
A well-written introduction sets the stage for the paper.
3.5 Points
The introduction adequately sets the stage ...
RubricDiscussion of Which Employees May Need Coaching and Which .docxjoellemurphey
Rubric
Discussion of Which Employees May Need Coaching and Which Are Performing at Acceptable Levels
No discussion of which employees may need coaching and which are performing at acceptable levels is presented.
A discussion of which employees may need coaching and which are performing at acceptable levels is presented, but the discussion is not connected to the data given.
A cursory discussion of which employees may need coaching and which are performing at acceptable levels is presented. The discussion is loosely connected to the data given.
A thorough discussion of which employees may need coaching and which are performing at acceptable levels is presented. The discussion connects reasonably to the data given.
A thorough discussion of which employees may need coaching and which are performing at acceptable levels is presented. The discussion is clearly, logically, and directly connected to the data given.
25.0 %Explanation of Which Principles of Consulting and Coaching Would most Effectively be Applied to Improve Organizational Performance Benchmarks C 4.3: Apply principles of interpersonal and group consulting and coaching to improve organizational performance.
No explanation of which principles of consulting and coaching would most effectively be applied to improve organizational performance is presented.
A vague explanation of which principles of consulting and coaching would most effectively be applied to improve organizational performance is presented, but information presented is not based on scholarly sources.
A cursory explanation of which principles of consulting and coaching would most effectively be applied to improve organizational performance is presented. Information presented is from both non-scholarly and scholarly sources.
A thorough explanation of which principles of consulting and coaching would most effectively be applied to improve organizational performance is presented. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
A thorough explanation of which principles of consulting and coaching would most effectively be applied to improve organizational performance is presented. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
15.0 %Regression Equation and Justification of Hiring Decision
No regression equation and justification of hiring decision are presented.
The regression is not clearly visible. A vague justification of hiring decision is presented, but information presented is not based on scholarly sources.
The regression equation is clearly stated. A cursory justification of hiring decision is presented. Information presented is from both non-scholarly and scholarly sources.
The regression equation is clearly stated. A thorough justification of hiring decision is presented. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
The regression equation is clearly stated. A thorough and insightful and justification of hiring decision is presented. Information presented is from current schola ...
OverviewThis course includes three Article Analyses. These.docxalfred4lewis58146
Overview
This course includes three Article Analyses. These exercises are designed to actively involve you in HR considerations and decision making, and help you understand how the concepts covered in the course apply to complex real-world situations. These exercises also provide practice communicating your reasoning in a professional manner.
3-3 Module Three HR Article Analysis: Crisis Management
Students will demonstrate their knowledge of HR’s role in and influence on legal and environmental risk mitigation, as well as the integration of ethical practices.
Read the article:
“Crisis Management: Prevention, Diagnosis and Intervention” by Toby J. Kash and John R. Darling (SNHU Library online) http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.snhu.edu/docview/226915167
Write a 3- to 5-page analysis (approximately 3,000 words) on the companies in the assigned case study. In your analysis, do the following:
a. Briefly summarize the article (1-3 paragraphs).
b. Identify 3 different companies in the article.
a. Discuss whether the risk management approach taken by each company was a preventive or intervention measure.
b. Consider whether or not the risks change when events are addressed in a proactive manner instead of a reactive manner. Explain your reasoning.
c. Compare the different types of leadership approaches, and suggest how an HR department might implement strategies to mitigate risk or manage a crisis event.
d. Discuss ethical ways for mitigating risks with key stakeholders, considering practical implications to executive leaders.
Guidelines
The article analysis must follow these formatting guidelines: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and APA citations. Page length requirements: 3-5 pages, not including cover page and references. Failure to adhere to these requirements of submission will result in the project not being graded.
Rubric for Article Analysis One/Module Three
Critical Elements
Exemplary
Proficient
Needs Improvement
Not Evident
Value
Summary of the article
N/A
Includes a brief summary of the article
(10)
N/A
Does not include a summary of the article
(0)
5
3 different companies
Identifies 3 different companies in the article
(10)
Identifies 1 or 2 different companies in the article
(9-5)
Does not identify any companies in the article
(0)
5
Preventive or intervention
Submission meets “Proficient” and extends explanation to include supporting evidence from scholarly resources
(10)
Evaluates whether the risk management approach was a preventive or intervention measure and clearly explains why
(9-7)
Evaluates whether the risk management approach was a preventive or intervention measure, but is not correct, or does not clearly explain why
(6-4)
Does not evaluate whether the risk management approach was a preventive or intervention measure
(0)
10
Explain whether risks change when addressed proactively as opposed to reactively
Submission meets “Proficient” and provides illustrative examples
(15)
Explains cl.
PJM6125 Project Evaluation:
Stakeholder Analysis & Evaluation Goal Matrix
Overview and Rationale
For this assignment, you will establish some evaluation goals for your project based on the
method and lens covered in this week’s lecture.
Program and Course Outcomes
This assignment is directly linked to the following key learning outcomes from the course
syllabus:
LO1: Identify and analyze stakeholders associated with performance evaluation.
LO2: Design an evaluation goals matrix incorporating the differences between impact, efficiency,
and effectiveness
LO6: Compare change management procedures needed to respond to the results of both tactical
and non-tactical performance evaluation
L07: Plan and conduct a tactical evaluation using both qualitative and quantitative measures
Essential Components & Instructions
This assignment is completed in two parts. First, using your chosen project that you
submitted as part of Lesson 1, complete the following items:
Stakeholder Register / Analysis:
Create a stakeholder register / analysis that includes the following minimum
columns:
o Stakeholder
o Stakeholder Position / Role
o Type of Stakeholder (internal or external)
o Stakeholder expectation (high level needs or expectations of project)
o Stakeholder interest (high / medium / low)
o Stakeholder influence level (high / medium / low)
o Stakeholder view of project (supportive / neutral / opposed)
o Stakeholder Management strategy (approach to engaging stakeholder to
support success of project)
Once you create the register, create entries for a minimum of 12 - 15 project
stakeholders, performing a full analysis for each of them.
Part 2: Evaluation Goals Matrix:
After completing the stakeholder register, you will create an evaluation goals matrix, as
illustrated in Lesson 2, with an additional column entitled stakeholder. Once you have
designed the evaluation goal matrix, you will need to list at least four evaluation goals for
each category: efficiency, effectiveness, and impact, which will result in a total of 12 metrics
/ goals.
You will be assess on the clarity of the metrics, the concreteness of the measures (Example:
increased performance by 12 percent (concrete) vs. increase performance (not concrete, as
no specific measurement of increase)), and how well the metric will measure the success of
project relative to the overview of the project you provided as a case study.
Format
Below are some key guidelines you will want to ensure you follow in all three elements of
this assignment. Think of this short list as a quality control checklist, along with the
attached grading rubric.
Part 1 and Part 2 (stakeholder analysis and evaluation matrix) should be submitted
as a single file (MsWord or .pdf)
You should include a cover page
You should include a brief summary of your chosen project.
You should format the documents professionally
The tables should be readable.
Please use the grading rubric to create an outline of your assig.docxblazelaj2
Please use the grading rubric to create an outline of your assignment. Each section of the rubric should be a section of your final paper and could become the headings. Your assignment will be graded based on each element of the rubric. Compare each section of your paper with the rubric to ensure all elements are covered. Then, include an introduction and conclusion to tie the paper together. If you have any questions regarding the assignment please contact your instructor using the Course Help forum.
As a nursing leader you will have the opportunity to implement many proposals. This is an exercise to help you learn the processes or steps you will need for implementation. Utilizing assignment one choose one of the program outcomes and develop a quality assurance/capstone project that you believe would be beneficial to your area of employment, or the profession of nursing in general.
Topic: Enhance professional nursing practice through the use of research and evidence-based practice, a quality assurance project that will benefit emergency room care.
In assignment 2 you will address the following points.
the capstone project topic.
review of the literature to validate the importance of the project.
Location for the proposed plan
three outcomes you plan to achieve.
how the project will impact your workplace and your institution
how the project will impact your nursing practice, your workplace and nursing as a profession
However, please note that there is no expectation that you will implement this plan. If you are using a plan from a previous course, you must make significant changes to your paper or cite yourself. Using previously graded work is self-plagiarism.
Grading Rubric
Competency
20 points
12 points
7 points
0 points
Total Points
Develops a well-organized discussion of the capstone project and reviews the literature to support the validity of the project.
Develops a well-organized discussion of the capstone project and reviews the literature to support the validity of the project.
Discussion of capstone project minimally describes the importance of the project and/or literature does not support the validity of the project
Discussion of capstone project is poorly stated and/or the literature review is missing or poorly supports the validity of the project.
No paper submitted or content missing.
/20
Provides a detailed summary of the location and key players (stakeholders) necessary for success of the project.
Provides a detailed summary of the location and key players (stakeholders) necessary for success of the project.
Provides a summary and discussion of the location as well as key players for the project but content is missing or not in-depth enough
Provides vague and poorly presented discussion of the location and key stakeholders for the project and/or content is missing
Does not describes the proposed plan or no paper .
Walden University M.S. in NursingFormative Evaluation Criteria f.docxcelenarouzie
Walden University M.S. in Nursing
Formative Evaluation Criteria for Applications and Formal Papers
Categories and Criteria
Points
QUALITY OF WORK SUBMITTED - 35 Possible Points
1. The extent to which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking (0-30 Points)
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
25-30
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
20-24
Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
16-19
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
0-15
2. Purpose of the paper is clear (0-5 Points)
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.
5
Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
4
Purpose of the assignment is vague.
1-3
No purpose statement was provided.
0
ASSIMILATION AND SYNTHESIS OF IDEAS - 50 Possible Points
The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to-
1. Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts (0-10 Points)
Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.
9-10
Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.
8
Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts.
5-7
Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.
0-4
2. Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources (0-20 Points)
Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 3-4 course resources to support point of view.
15-20
Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 3 to 4 course resources to support major points and point of view.
10-14
Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view.
3-9
Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resource to support major points and point of view.
0-2
3. Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections. (0-20 Points)
Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice.
18-20
Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize.
16-17
I.
NUR 699 – CapstoneProblem Description Holistic AssessmentD.docxhopeaustin33688
NUR 699 – Capstone
Problem Description Holistic Assessment
Directions: Utilizing the assessment tool below, the first submission of this portion of the assignment will be graded holistically. In order to achieve the full points for the assignment, all the criteria on the left must be met at the competency level described on the right.
Criteria
12 pts
24 pts
36 pts
48 pts
60 pts
Problem Description
Describe the background of the problem.
Identify the stakeholders/change agents and list the interested parties.
Provide the PICOT question.
State the purpose and project objectives in specific, realistic, and measurable terms. Develop an initial reference list
No discernible problem description and/or objectives. The problem selection rationale is not addressed or minimally addressed. Expected changes before and after the evidence-based practice is not addressed or minimally addressed. Reveals inaccurate comprehension of material and lacks the ability to apply information. Subject matter is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant. Initial reference list is missing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
Addresses the problem description and objectives but not all components. Alignment is difficult to discern. The problem is not in the correct format. Objectives are lacking measurement or may be ambiguous; The problem selection rationale is not addressed or minimally introduced with now supporting details. Expected changes before and after the evidence-based practice are listed. Displays a lack of comprehension but attempts to apply information. Develops partial initial reference list .There is weak, marginal coverage of subject matter with large gaps in presentation. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.
Problem description and objectives are stated but may not be fully developed or aligned; The problem is in the PICOT format but not appropriately developed. Objectives are measurable but may be ambiguous; The problem selection rationale is present but the significance is unclear. Expected changes are briefly introduced. Exhibits comprehension of the material and clearly attempts to integrate and apply information. Develops an initial reference list. All subject matter is covered in minimal quantity and quality. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
Problem description and objectives are presented and tie together; Identifies the stakeholders/change agents, who or what organizations are concerned, may benefit from, or are affected by this proposal. The problem is in the PICOT format and developed appropriately. Objectives are measurable; The problem selection is justified using liter.
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeHLT-605HLT-605-O101Community Prevention Project250.0CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good (87.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent70.0%Community Related Health Concerns: Identify Vector-Related Diseases Affecting Community20.0%Diseases are not vector-related; vector-related diseases presented are not relevant to the local community health concerns.Vector-related diseases are presented and relevant to the local community; evidence is not presented to support claims; evidence used is not substantiated using information from state public health and environmental quality departments for the local community health concerns.Vector-related diseases presented are relevant to the local community. Claims are partially substantiated using information from state public health and environmental quality departments for the local community health concerns. More relevant evidence is needed for support. Vector-related diseases presented are relevant to the local community. Claims are generally substantiated using information from state public health and environmental quality departments for the local community health concerns. Vector-related diseases are relevant to the local community. Claims are strongly substantiated using information from state public health and environmental quality departments for the local community health concerns.Identify Current Environmental Risk Assessment Methods Applicable to Public Health Issues20.0%Current environmental risk methods applicable to public health issues are not identified.Some environmental risk methods are referenced; the environmental risk methods are not current, or are not applicable to public health issues.General environmental risk methods applicable to public health issues are identified; most environmental risk methods are current and applicable to public health issues.Environmental risk methods applicable to public health issues are identified; environmental risk methods are current and applicable to public health issues, but more supporting detail is needed. Environmental risk methods applicable to public health issues are clearly identified; environmental risk methods are current, applicable and highly relevant to public health issues.Propose Modifier, New Prevention or Intervention Program 20.0%No modifier, new prevention or intervention program is suggested.Reference is made to a modifier, new prevention or intervention program. No evidence or details are offered for support.A modifier, new prevention or intervention program is suggested. Some evidence is provided for support, but suggestion lacks support to demonstrate relevance to local public health issue presented.A modifier, new prevention or intervention program is suggested. Evidence is provided that generally demonstrates support and relevance to local public health issue presented.A modifier, new prevention or intervention program.
DetailsIf counseling is all talk and no action it is not effe.docxalexandernmeredith30
Details:
If counseling is all talk and no action it is not effective counseling. The problem is that clients encounter many barriers in carrying out actions they identify in the counseling process.
Write a 750-1,000-word paper discussing action planning and overcoming barriers for client treatment. Please use headings and include the following in your paper:
Discuss the principles for effectively implementing an action plan.
Describe at least five barriers that might interfere with client implementation of the action plans that are created. Include a case example of each barrier.
Outline a counselor intervention that would help to overcome each barrier.
A list of your local community resources for different types of needs.
Outline an aftercare plan that utilized local community resources.
Include at least three scholarly references in your paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
This assignment meets the following CACREP Standards:
2.F.5.g. Essential interviewing, counseling, and case conceptualization skills.
2.F.5.i. Development of measurable outcomes for clients.
2.F.5.k. Strategies to promote client understanding of and access to a variety of community-based resources.
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
10.0 %
Principles for effectively implementing an action plan
Discussion of the principles for effectively implementing an action plan is not present or not discernible to the reader.
Discussion of the principles for effectively implementing an action plan is incomplete or flawed.
Discussion of the principles for effectively implementing an action plan is accurate and complete.
Discussion of the principles for effectively implementing an action plan is thorough and well-reasoned.
Discussion of the principles for effectively implementing an action plan is thorough and well-reasoned. Information provided is fully supported and rich in detail.
10.0 %
Barriers that might interfere with client implementation of the action plans, including a case example of each barrier
Discussion of the barriers that might interfere with implementation of the action plans.is not present or not discernible to the reader.
Discussion of the barriers that might interfere with implementation of the action plans is incomplete or flawed.
Discussion of the barriers that might interfere with implementation of the action plans is accurate and complete, including relevant examples illustrating the techniques provided.
Discussion of the barriers that might interfere w.
Executive Summary In this assignment, you will propose a quality.docxrhetttrevannion
Executive Summary
In this assignment, you will propose a quality improvement initiative from your place of employment that could easily be implemented if approved. Assume you are presenting this program to the board for approval of funding. Write an executive summary (750-1,000 words) to present to the board, from which the board will make its decision to fund your program or project. Include the following:
The purpose of the quality improvement initiative.
The target population or audience.
The benefits of the quality improvement initiative.
The interprofessional collaboration that would be required to implement the quality improvement initiative.
The cost or budget justification.
The basis upon which the quality improvement initiative will be evaluated.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the
LopesWrite Technical Support articles
for assistance.
RUBRIC
Attempt Start Date:
12-Aug-2019 at 12:00:00 AM
Due Date:
18-Aug-2019 at 11:59:59 PM
Maximum Points:
140.0
Executive Summary
No of Criteria: 11 Achievement Levels: 5
CriteriaAchievement LevelsDescriptionPercentageUnsatisfactory0.00 %Less Than Satisfactory75.00 %Satisfactory79.00 %Good89.00 %Excellent100.00 %Content80.0
Purpose of the Quality Improvement Initiative15.0The purpose of the quality improvement initiative is not provided.The purpose of the quality improvement initiative is incomplete, missing relevant information.The purpose of the quality improvement initiative is provided and meets the basic criteria for the assignment as indicated in the assignment instructions.The purpose of the quality improvement initiative meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail.The purpose of the quality improvement initiative meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, is provided in detail, and demonstrates higher level thinking by incorporating prior learning or reflective thought.Target Population or Audience13.0The target population or audience is not addressed.The target population or audience is incomplete, missing relevant information.The target population or audience is provided and meet the basic criteria for the assignment as indicated in the assignment instructions.The target population or audience meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail.The target population or audience meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail, while demonstrating higher level thinking by incorporating prior learning or .
Top of FormBottom of FormEnterprise Architecture Enables Proce.docxturveycharlyn
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Enterprise Architecture Enables Processes Paper
Purpose of this Assignment
This assignment gives you the opportunity to apply your critical thinking skills and understanding of the course concepts to explain how the enterprise architecture (EA) and/or the EA program supports the other IT management processes of an organization. This assignment specifically addresses the following course outcomes:
· describe enterprise architecture (EA), the appropriate application of EA frameworks, and an overall ongoing EA program
· analyze and examine how enterprise architecture and enterprise systems influence, support, and enable an organization's ability to contribute to strategic decision making and to respond and adapt to the business environment
· apply EA concepts to support business requirements and identify opportunities for enterprise solutions
Assignment
As you have learned throughout the course, EAs can be used to support a wide variety of information technology management processes, and an EA program strengthens IT management activities. A well-defined and implemented EA contributes significantly to each of the phases of the systems development life cycle (SDLC). For this assignment you will write a 3-5 page paper (not counting any cover sheet or reference pages) that explains briefly what enterprise architecture (EA) is and then how it supplements and enables each of the phases of the SDLC:
· initiation/planning/concept phase
· requirements analysis phase
· design phase
· development phase
· integration and testing phase
· implementation/deployment/support/maintenance phase
You should explain how EA enables each phase, how it fits into each phase, and what unique qualities or capabilities a well-defined EA contributes that might not otherwise be available to the organization.
The use of at least two external scholarly resources (other than class materials) is required. (NOTE: More than two external resources are required to receive all possible points; see Grading Rubric below.) You should use scholarly journals (rather than Wikipedia and author-less website postings). Remember to correctly cite and reference all sources using APA format.
Grading Rubric
Use the rubric below to be sure you have covered all aspects of the assignment.Criteria
90-100%
Far Above Standards
80-89%
Above Standards
70-79%
Meets Standards
60-69%
Below Standards
< 60%
Well Below Standards
Possible Points
Intro-duction
5 Points
A sophisticated introduction sets the stage for the paper.
4 Points
A well-written introduction sets the stage for the paper.
3.5 Points
The introduction adequately sets the stage for the paper.
3 Points
The introduction does not adequately set the stage for the paper.
0-2 Points
No introduction included.
5
Explana-tion of Enterprise Architec-ture
13-15 Points
Explanation is brief but clear; is complete enough to set the stage for the paper; and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of course concepts.
1 ...
OL 750 Individual Research PaperOverviewDuring the course, .docxhopeaustin33688
OL 750: Individual Research Paper
Overview
During the course, students will explore a number of topics of significant trends that will affect people at work over the next 30 years. Students are asked to write a paper on a topic, providing sufficient information to provide the reader with a deeper understanding of it and discussing the implications it has for self, organizations, society.
The paper should be comprehensive, well researched, having in depth analysis and displaying critical thinking skills. The topic should be relevant to the individual. It could be the future developments in their field or business or a topic that has excited the student and wish to explore further. Students should discuss the topic with the faculty member before commencing the investigation. This paper is due in Module Seven.
As part of your research you may choose to interview a leader engaged in your topic of interest. The document, Leadership Interview located in the Assignment Guidelines and Rubrics section of the course, provides a format for question asking. Use the Interview Consent form to obtain formal consent prior to the interview.
Main Elements
The research paper should include an extensive survey of the literature. It is expected that this research project will draw on a number of significant sources (minimum of 10), the majority of which must come from the Shapiro Library holdings, including electronic databases.
The following is a list of main elements that could be addressed:
1. Demographic Trends
2. Future Trends is HR
3. Recruitment and Retention
4. Trends in Government Intervention
5. Effects of Changing Technology on Traditional Business Models
6. Rebuilding of Public Trust
7. Fashion Trends
Rubric
Requirements of submission: Written components of projects must follow these formatting guidelines when applicable: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and discipline-appropriate citations. This paper should be 12 – 15 pages in length.
Instructor Feedback: Students can find their feedback in the grade book as an attachment.
Critical Elements
Distinguished
Proficient
Emerging
Not Evident
Value
Main Elements
Includes almost all of the main elements and requirements and cites multiple examples to illustrate each element
(23-25)
Includes most of the main elements and requirements and cites many examples to illustrate each element
(20-22)
Includes some of the main elements and requirements
(18-19)
Does not include any of the main elements and requirements
(0-17)
25
Inquiry and Analysis
Explores multiple issues through extensive collection and in-depth analysis of evidence to make informed conclusions
(18-20)
Explores some issues through collection and in-depth analysis of evidence to make informed conclusions
(16-17)
Explores minimal issues through collection and analysis of evidence to make informed conclusions
(14-15)
Does not explore issues through collection and analysis of evidence.
Clinical Assignment Quality Improvement Project Part 1GoalWilheminaRossi174
Clinical Assignment: Quality Improvement Project Part 1
Goal:
· To assess a clinical issue that is the focus of your Quality Improvement Project.
· Create a description of the clinical issue to be addressed in the project.
Content Requirements:
1. Identify the clinical issue that will be the focus of your Quality Improvement project.
2. Provide rationale for the need to change the status quo.
3. Identify best practices from the literature related to the issues.
Submission Instructions:
· The paper is to be clear and concise, and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.
· The paper is to be 2 - 3 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page.
· Incorporate a minimum of 3 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
· Journal articles and books should be referenced according to current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).
· Your paper should be formatted per current APA and references should be current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions)
· Complete and submit the assignment by 11:59 PM ET on Sunday.
· Note: this is first part of your Quality Improvement Project. You should revise/improve your work based on your professor's feedback. In module 7, you will be putting all the parts together to complete and submit your final project.
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeAssignment TitleTotal PointsNRS-493NRS-493-O501Capstone Project Topic Selection and Approval50.0CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good (89.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent80.0%Project Topic for Focus of Change Proposal5.0%The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is omitted.The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is presented but is largely incomplete.The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is summarized. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Some support is needed.The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is clearly and logically presented. Support and rationale are evident.Setting or Context Where Project Topic Is Observed10.0%Th ...
Due Date Thursday at 1159 pm of Unit 8 Points 100 .docxShiraPrater50
Due Date: Thursday at 11:59 pm of Unit 8
Points: 100
Overview:
As we have stated, self-assessment is a critical component of the Baldrige process.
Accordingly, this assignment will require you to engage in a reflective process and allow you to
develop and articulate your own thoughts on the concept of "quality", the Baldrige principles,
organizational issues, personal and organizational learning, corporate responsibility, and other
important ideas discussed in this course.
Instructions:
Your paper should cover:
A reflection of the Baldrige process and quality.
Organizational issues
Personal and organizational learning.
Corporate responsibility
Your paper should cover the issues above, address your learning experience in the course, and
identify areas of your greatest (or least, if necessary) development or understanding. A well-
developed paper will make reference to the Baldrige principles in a coherent and thoughtful
way, introduce new thinking if appropriate, and show an understanding of the course materials
and their application in an organizational or personal environment.
Please write clearly and in a grammatically correct manner. Remember, clarity of presentation
goes a long way in enhancing the credibility of the presentation.
Requirements:
Length: a minimum of five pages, not including title or reference pages
Resources: a minimum of four resources to back up your reflection
Demonstrate a depth of thought and consideration worthy of a course in quality systems.
The final product will be a paper that is double-spaced, APA formatted pages.
Be sure to read the criteria by which your work will be evaluated before you write and
again after you write.
BUS211 – Baldrige Principles and
Introduction to Quality
Unit 8 Assignment: Reflection Paper
Evaluation Rubric for Unit 8 Assignment
CRITERIA Exemplary Proficient Needs
Improvement
Deficient
(19-20 Points) (16-18 Points) (13-15 Points) (0-12 Points)
Reflection of
the Baldrige
Process and
Quality
The reflection
on the Baldrige
process is
clearly defined
and presented,
including all
details.
The reflection on
the Baldrige
process is
present, but is
missing minor
details.
The reflection on
the Baldrige
process is
present, but is
missing key
details.
The reflection
on the Baldrige
process is
missing or
poorly
presented.
Organizational
Issues
Organizational
issues are
clearly defined
and presented,
including all
details.
Organizational
issues are
present, but is
missing minor
details.
Organizational
issues are
present, but is
missing key
details.
Organizational
issues are
missing or
poorly
presented.
Personal and
Organizational
Learning
Personal and
organizational
learning is
clearly defined
and presented,
including all
details.
Personal and
organizational
learning is
present, but is
missing minor
details.
Personal and
organ ...
Due Date Thursday at 1159 pm of Unit 8 Points 100 .docxgertrudebellgrove
Due Date: Thursday at 11:59 pm of Unit 8
Points: 100
Overview:
As we have stated, self-assessment is a critical component of the Baldrige process.
Accordingly, this assignment will require you to engage in a reflective process and allow you to
develop and articulate your own thoughts on the concept of "quality", the Baldrige principles,
organizational issues, personal and organizational learning, corporate responsibility, and other
important ideas discussed in this course.
Instructions:
Your paper should cover:
A reflection of the Baldrige process and quality.
Organizational issues
Personal and organizational learning.
Corporate responsibility
Your paper should cover the issues above, address your learning experience in the course, and
identify areas of your greatest (or least, if necessary) development or understanding. A well-
developed paper will make reference to the Baldrige principles in a coherent and thoughtful
way, introduce new thinking if appropriate, and show an understanding of the course materials
and their application in an organizational or personal environment.
Please write clearly and in a grammatically correct manner. Remember, clarity of presentation
goes a long way in enhancing the credibility of the presentation.
Requirements:
Length: a minimum of five pages, not including title or reference pages
Resources: a minimum of four resources to back up your reflection
Demonstrate a depth of thought and consideration worthy of a course in quality systems.
The final product will be a paper that is double-spaced, APA formatted pages.
Be sure to read the criteria by which your work will be evaluated before you write and
again after you write.
BUS211 – Baldrige Principles and
Introduction to Quality
Unit 8 Assignment: Reflection Paper
Evaluation Rubric for Unit 8 Assignment
CRITERIA Exemplary Proficient Needs
Improvement
Deficient
(19-20 Points) (16-18 Points) (13-15 Points) (0-12 Points)
Reflection of
the Baldrige
Process and
Quality
The reflection
on the Baldrige
process is
clearly defined
and presented,
including all
details.
The reflection on
the Baldrige
process is
present, but is
missing minor
details.
The reflection on
the Baldrige
process is
present, but is
missing key
details.
The reflection
on the Baldrige
process is
missing or
poorly
presented.
Organizational
Issues
Organizational
issues are
clearly defined
and presented,
including all
details.
Organizational
issues are
present, but is
missing minor
details.
Organizational
issues are
present, but is
missing key
details.
Organizational
issues are
missing or
poorly
presented.
Personal and
Organizational
Learning
Personal and
organizational
learning is
clearly defined
and presented,
including all
details.
Personal and
organizational
learning is
present, but is
missing minor
details.
Personal and
organ.
WarningYou do not have permissions to perform this activityA.docxmelbruce90096
Warning
You do not have permissions to perform this activity
Assignment
Week 10 | Diversity in the Health Care Organization
Details:
1) Providers must learn new tools to eliminate disparities, build trust with patients, and understand how international biases and pre-established stereotypes affect quality of care. Write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) that identifies and defines various tools and measurements that can be used to measure the effectiveness of diversity programs and policies established by the organization.
2) Address how each of the following must be considered when considering how to implement an environment of diversity:
a) Government regulations.
b) Social pressures.
c) Industry and company ethical codes.
d) Tension between personal standards and the goals of the organization.
3) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
4) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
Top of Form
Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the "Submit" button under "Final Submission" is clicked.
New Attempt
Bottom of Form
Title
Attached Documents
Turnitin Report
Similarity Index
Final Submission
Click 'New Attempt' to start assignment or attach documents
Error Details
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
Apply Rubrics
Addressing Diversity
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Content
40.0 %In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Does not demonstrate understanding of the issues surrounding diversity, including the implications. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the situation, and does not develop effective answers to the questions, with rationale.
Demonstrates only minimal understanding diversity. Demonstrates only minimal abilities for critical thinking and analysis of the case study, and develops weak answers to the questions, with minimal rationale
Demonstrates knowledge of issues surrounding diversity, but has some slight misunderstanding of the implications. Provides a basic idea of critical thinking and analysis for the questions, answers, and rationale. Does not include examples or descriptions.
Demonstrates acceptable knowledge of the issues surrounding diversity (in your own words). Develops an acceptable response and rationale for it. Utilizes some examples.
Demonstrates thorough knowledge of the issues surrounding diversity and their implications. Clearly answers the questions and develops a very strong rationale. Introduces appropri.
1Unsatisfactory0.002Less than Satisfactory74.003.docxvickeryr87
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
40.0 %Quality Tool Analysis
A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement, root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools you used to identify and vet the problem is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary of how you arrived at the problem is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.
A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement, root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools you used to identify and vet the problem makes weak connections with several gaps in presentation. An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary of how you arrived at the problem makes weak connections with several gaps in presentation. Supporting sources are present and that show limited understanding of the content.
A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement, root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools you used to identify and vet the problem makes connections at a cursory level and contains minimal gaps. An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary of how you arrived at the problem is at a cursory level and makes connections containing minimal gaps. Supporting sources are present and show some understanding of the content.
A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement, root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools you used to identify and vet the problem is clear and integrated, and makes meaningful connections with no gaps. An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary of how you arrived at the problem is clear and integrated, and makes meaningful connections with no gaps. Supporting sources are present that illustrate the understanding of the content.
A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement, root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools you used to identify and vet the problem is thorough and well integrated and makes meaningful connections with no gaps. An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary of how you arrived at the problem is thorough and well integrated, and makes meaningful connections with no gaps. Supporting sources are present that illustrate a deep understanding of the content.
30.0 %Stakeholder Analysis
A stakeholder analysis that includes a power interest grid and a summary of all considerations for all stakeholders is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.
A stakeholder analysis that includes a power interest grid and a summary of all considerations for all stakeholders makes weak connections with several gaps in presentation. Supporting sources are present and that show limited understanding of the content.
A stakeholder analysis that includes a power interest grid and a summary of all considerations.
Group Member Discussion RubricStudent NameTotal Points PossibleTot.docxwhittemorelucilla
Group Member Discussion RubricStudent NameTotal Points PossibleTotal Points ReceivedLate Work Percentage (select from drop down menu)Late Work DeductionFinal Points Received 750.000%
Windows User: Windows User:
Select dropdown menu for percentage deducted for late work.0.000.00CriterionSuperior Criteria (100%)Excellent Criteria (95%)Satisfactory Criteria (85%)Marginal Criteria (75%)Unacceptable Criteria (0%)Points Possible Evaluation (select from drop down menu)Points ReceivedFaculty FeedbackElement 1: Initial Posting Content for Weeks 2, 4, 6 (28 points maximum; 37% of total points)Student provides an original, thought-provoking, in-depth initial post addressing more than one summative consideration. The student's post stimulates critical inquiry and uses at least five additional scholarly resources to support thinking.Student provides an original, thought-provoking, in-depth initial post addressing more than one summative consideration. The student's post stimulates critical inquiry and uses at least five additional scholarly resources to support thinking. However, there are one or two minor errors in the content of the post.Student provides a good, organized post addressing at least one summative consideration, but does not consistently demonstrate higher-order thinking. The student's post stimulates some critical inquiry and uses at least five additional scholarly resources, but some details are lacking or not accurate. Student provides a weak or incomplete post addressing at least one summative consideration. The student's post demonstrates a low level of thinking and/or resources are lacking and/or do not support thinking.Does not meet minimal standards.280%
Windows User: Windows User:
Select drop down menu for inputting grade for this criterion.0Element 2: Follow-up Responses to Colleagues and Interaction for Weeks 3, 5, 7 (27 points maximum; 36% of total points)Student engages with several peers bringing the discussion to a higher level of inquiry and investigation. Responses are thorough and fully contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes.
Student engages with several peers bringing the discussion to a higher level of inquiry and investigation. Responses are thorough and fully contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes. However, there are one or two minor errors in content of responses.Student engages with at least two peers and helps extend the discussion. Responses are good and somewhat contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes. Student engages with at least two peers. Responses are minimal and do not fully contribute to the q ...
Introduction to Epidemiology Course Project Detailed Article Cri.docxmariuse18nolet
Introduction to Epidemiology Course Project
Detailed Article Critique
Reading, interpreting, and judging the value of epidemiologic literature is a skill that you will exercise throughout your academic career in public health and beyond. To help prepare you for your thesis or capstone experience as well as future coursework, your project this term involves writing a detailed critique of an article. (See link in blackboard.) Construct your critique using complete paragraphs. DO NOT present your critique as an outline.
Please consult the table on the next page to ensure that your review includes the required major elements for this assignment. We will use this table in our evaluation of your project. Each element is worth a specified number of points. Please understand that full credit will not be awarded for simply mentioning each element. You must justify your assessment. For example, you cannot simply state, “The authors justified the importance of their study.” You need to point out how the authors did or did not meet each criterion. Your critique should not be longer than 4-6 pages double-spaced with one-inch margins. There is no minimum page requirement.
For additional assistance, please refer to the article by Young et al. (2009) that is also posted in Blackboard along with the article that you are to review.
See next page for more details. ( ( ( ( ( (
Name___________________________
Element
Possible Points
Grade
Objectives:
· What is/are the research question(s) addressed by this study?
· Did the authors justify the need for their study? What was it?
5
5
Study Design:
· Describe the study design and methods used for the study.
· Critique the overall design by addressing the following:
· Did the authors correctly identify their study design (e.g., the authors stated that their study was a cohort study when it really was a cross-sectional study)?
· Did the authors present clear definitions of their exposure/health outcomes?
· Did the authors adequately describe their sampling (e.g., convenience, consecutive, or random; response rate; study population) and data collection methods (e.g., questionnaire, records, biomarkers, surveys, etc.)?
15
10
Analysis:
· Describe the data analysis plan overall.
· Critique the analysis plan by addressing the following:
· Is the analysis appropriate for the study design (considering you level of statistical knowledge)? Was potential confounding addressed in the analysis stage? If so, how?
· Are the tables and graphs well organized and labeled? Do the tables and graphs provide enough data for reader to draw their own conclusions (e.g. do they stand alone?)?
· Are the findings within the tables/figures consistent? Is each table/figure consistent with the text and other tables/figures?
· Can the findings be attributed simply to chance?
5
10
Validity and Conclusions:
· Internal validity- Consider the potential for selection bias, information bias, and .
Nine-year-old Wandas teacher notices that for the past few weeks,.docxTanaMaeskm
Nine-year-old Wanda's teacher notices that for the past few weeks, Wanda has not been talking to her friends and is always sitting alone in a corner. After talking to Wanda's friends, the teacher finds out that Wanda's sixteen-year-old brother was killed in a gang fight two months ago and her parents have since separated. The teacher talks to her friend Daphne, a counselor, to see if there is anything she can do about Wanda. She wants to know if there is any way in which children and families affected by exposure to violence can be assisted with emotional impact of these events. The teacher also asks Daphne, in the role of a counselor, to call Wanda's parents to see if they would be willing to talk with her about the death of their son, their separation, and Wanda's behavior at school. Daphne is not employed or affiliated with the school.
What would be Daphne's role, as a counselor, in helping the teacher?
What do you see as important roles of a counselor working in a community?
What are the ethical responsibilities that counselors and human services professionals hold toward the community? When answering this question identify the ethical code number and definition, using your own words, of the ethical responsibilities of these professionals.
Briefly speak how you, as an ethical counselor, would respond to the teacher's request for you to speak with Wanda and her family.
DUE TODAY 10/25/16 @6PM eastern time
.
Newspapers frequently feature stories on how various democratic prin.docxTanaMaeskm
Newspapers frequently feature stories on how various democratic principles and processes contribute to democratic governance and impact a wide variety of issues, ranging from the distribution of flu vaccines to the appropriate legal venue for terrorist trials. Public policies that are formulated to address such issues come about as the result of the influence and application of various democratic principles and processes. In addition, competing interests and factions engage in the democratic process using tools such as lobbying or elections in an effort to leverage public policy. As you think about democratic principles and processes for this Assignment, take note of where you see their influence in recent public policy issues. To prepare for this Assignment: • Review the article “War v. Justice: Terrorism Cases, Enemy Combatants, and Political Justice in U.S. Courts” in this week’s Learning Resources. Take note of key democratic principles explained. Consider how the democratic principles in the article might influence public policy. • Review the articles “Strategic Lobbying: Demonstrating How Legislative Context Affects Interest Groups’ Lobbying Tactics” and “The Study of Party Factions as Competitive Political Organizations” in this week’s Learning Resources. • Think about the democratic processes used by lobbying groups and political factions to influence public policy. • Select a public policy issue related to your specialization or to an area with which you are familiar. • Select three democratic principles and/or processes that you think might influence the formulation of public policy related to your issue. • Reflect on how these principles and processes of democracy influence the formulation of the public policy you selected. The Assignment (2–3 pages): • Briefly describe the public policy issue you selected for this Assignment. • Using three democratic principles and/or processes of your choice, explain how you think these democratic principles and/or processes influence the formulation of public policy. • Based on your analysis, share at least one insight you gained about the influence of democratic principles and processes on the formulation of public policy. Or, if you live outside the United States, explain how these democratic principles might affect governance in your country.
.
More Related Content
Similar to Essay Rubric Criteria Rating Points Exceeds Exp
PJM6125 Project Evaluation:
Stakeholder Analysis & Evaluation Goal Matrix
Overview and Rationale
For this assignment, you will establish some evaluation goals for your project based on the
method and lens covered in this week’s lecture.
Program and Course Outcomes
This assignment is directly linked to the following key learning outcomes from the course
syllabus:
LO1: Identify and analyze stakeholders associated with performance evaluation.
LO2: Design an evaluation goals matrix incorporating the differences between impact, efficiency,
and effectiveness
LO6: Compare change management procedures needed to respond to the results of both tactical
and non-tactical performance evaluation
L07: Plan and conduct a tactical evaluation using both qualitative and quantitative measures
Essential Components & Instructions
This assignment is completed in two parts. First, using your chosen project that you
submitted as part of Lesson 1, complete the following items:
Stakeholder Register / Analysis:
Create a stakeholder register / analysis that includes the following minimum
columns:
o Stakeholder
o Stakeholder Position / Role
o Type of Stakeholder (internal or external)
o Stakeholder expectation (high level needs or expectations of project)
o Stakeholder interest (high / medium / low)
o Stakeholder influence level (high / medium / low)
o Stakeholder view of project (supportive / neutral / opposed)
o Stakeholder Management strategy (approach to engaging stakeholder to
support success of project)
Once you create the register, create entries for a minimum of 12 - 15 project
stakeholders, performing a full analysis for each of them.
Part 2: Evaluation Goals Matrix:
After completing the stakeholder register, you will create an evaluation goals matrix, as
illustrated in Lesson 2, with an additional column entitled stakeholder. Once you have
designed the evaluation goal matrix, you will need to list at least four evaluation goals for
each category: efficiency, effectiveness, and impact, which will result in a total of 12 metrics
/ goals.
You will be assess on the clarity of the metrics, the concreteness of the measures (Example:
increased performance by 12 percent (concrete) vs. increase performance (not concrete, as
no specific measurement of increase)), and how well the metric will measure the success of
project relative to the overview of the project you provided as a case study.
Format
Below are some key guidelines you will want to ensure you follow in all three elements of
this assignment. Think of this short list as a quality control checklist, along with the
attached grading rubric.
Part 1 and Part 2 (stakeholder analysis and evaluation matrix) should be submitted
as a single file (MsWord or .pdf)
You should include a cover page
You should include a brief summary of your chosen project.
You should format the documents professionally
The tables should be readable.
Please use the grading rubric to create an outline of your assig.docxblazelaj2
Please use the grading rubric to create an outline of your assignment. Each section of the rubric should be a section of your final paper and could become the headings. Your assignment will be graded based on each element of the rubric. Compare each section of your paper with the rubric to ensure all elements are covered. Then, include an introduction and conclusion to tie the paper together. If you have any questions regarding the assignment please contact your instructor using the Course Help forum.
As a nursing leader you will have the opportunity to implement many proposals. This is an exercise to help you learn the processes or steps you will need for implementation. Utilizing assignment one choose one of the program outcomes and develop a quality assurance/capstone project that you believe would be beneficial to your area of employment, or the profession of nursing in general.
Topic: Enhance professional nursing practice through the use of research and evidence-based practice, a quality assurance project that will benefit emergency room care.
In assignment 2 you will address the following points.
the capstone project topic.
review of the literature to validate the importance of the project.
Location for the proposed plan
three outcomes you plan to achieve.
how the project will impact your workplace and your institution
how the project will impact your nursing practice, your workplace and nursing as a profession
However, please note that there is no expectation that you will implement this plan. If you are using a plan from a previous course, you must make significant changes to your paper or cite yourself. Using previously graded work is self-plagiarism.
Grading Rubric
Competency
20 points
12 points
7 points
0 points
Total Points
Develops a well-organized discussion of the capstone project and reviews the literature to support the validity of the project.
Develops a well-organized discussion of the capstone project and reviews the literature to support the validity of the project.
Discussion of capstone project minimally describes the importance of the project and/or literature does not support the validity of the project
Discussion of capstone project is poorly stated and/or the literature review is missing or poorly supports the validity of the project.
No paper submitted or content missing.
/20
Provides a detailed summary of the location and key players (stakeholders) necessary for success of the project.
Provides a detailed summary of the location and key players (stakeholders) necessary for success of the project.
Provides a summary and discussion of the location as well as key players for the project but content is missing or not in-depth enough
Provides vague and poorly presented discussion of the location and key stakeholders for the project and/or content is missing
Does not describes the proposed plan or no paper .
Walden University M.S. in NursingFormative Evaluation Criteria f.docxcelenarouzie
Walden University M.S. in Nursing
Formative Evaluation Criteria for Applications and Formal Papers
Categories and Criteria
Points
QUALITY OF WORK SUBMITTED - 35 Possible Points
1. The extent to which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking (0-30 Points)
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
25-30
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
20-24
Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
16-19
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
0-15
2. Purpose of the paper is clear (0-5 Points)
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.
5
Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
4
Purpose of the assignment is vague.
1-3
No purpose statement was provided.
0
ASSIMILATION AND SYNTHESIS OF IDEAS - 50 Possible Points
The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to-
1. Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts (0-10 Points)
Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.
9-10
Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.
8
Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts.
5-7
Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.
0-4
2. Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources (0-20 Points)
Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 3-4 course resources to support point of view.
15-20
Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 3 to 4 course resources to support major points and point of view.
10-14
Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view.
3-9
Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resource to support major points and point of view.
0-2
3. Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections. (0-20 Points)
Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice.
18-20
Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize.
16-17
I.
NUR 699 – CapstoneProblem Description Holistic AssessmentD.docxhopeaustin33688
NUR 699 – Capstone
Problem Description Holistic Assessment
Directions: Utilizing the assessment tool below, the first submission of this portion of the assignment will be graded holistically. In order to achieve the full points for the assignment, all the criteria on the left must be met at the competency level described on the right.
Criteria
12 pts
24 pts
36 pts
48 pts
60 pts
Problem Description
Describe the background of the problem.
Identify the stakeholders/change agents and list the interested parties.
Provide the PICOT question.
State the purpose and project objectives in specific, realistic, and measurable terms. Develop an initial reference list
No discernible problem description and/or objectives. The problem selection rationale is not addressed or minimally addressed. Expected changes before and after the evidence-based practice is not addressed or minimally addressed. Reveals inaccurate comprehension of material and lacks the ability to apply information. Subject matter is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant. Initial reference list is missing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
Addresses the problem description and objectives but not all components. Alignment is difficult to discern. The problem is not in the correct format. Objectives are lacking measurement or may be ambiguous; The problem selection rationale is not addressed or minimally introduced with now supporting details. Expected changes before and after the evidence-based practice are listed. Displays a lack of comprehension but attempts to apply information. Develops partial initial reference list .There is weak, marginal coverage of subject matter with large gaps in presentation. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.
Problem description and objectives are stated but may not be fully developed or aligned; The problem is in the PICOT format but not appropriately developed. Objectives are measurable but may be ambiguous; The problem selection rationale is present but the significance is unclear. Expected changes are briefly introduced. Exhibits comprehension of the material and clearly attempts to integrate and apply information. Develops an initial reference list. All subject matter is covered in minimal quantity and quality. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
Problem description and objectives are presented and tie together; Identifies the stakeholders/change agents, who or what organizations are concerned, may benefit from, or are affected by this proposal. The problem is in the PICOT format and developed appropriately. Objectives are measurable; The problem selection is justified using liter.
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeHLT-605HLT-605-O101Community Prevention Project250.0CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good (87.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent70.0%Community Related Health Concerns: Identify Vector-Related Diseases Affecting Community20.0%Diseases are not vector-related; vector-related diseases presented are not relevant to the local community health concerns.Vector-related diseases are presented and relevant to the local community; evidence is not presented to support claims; evidence used is not substantiated using information from state public health and environmental quality departments for the local community health concerns.Vector-related diseases presented are relevant to the local community. Claims are partially substantiated using information from state public health and environmental quality departments for the local community health concerns. More relevant evidence is needed for support. Vector-related diseases presented are relevant to the local community. Claims are generally substantiated using information from state public health and environmental quality departments for the local community health concerns. Vector-related diseases are relevant to the local community. Claims are strongly substantiated using information from state public health and environmental quality departments for the local community health concerns.Identify Current Environmental Risk Assessment Methods Applicable to Public Health Issues20.0%Current environmental risk methods applicable to public health issues are not identified.Some environmental risk methods are referenced; the environmental risk methods are not current, or are not applicable to public health issues.General environmental risk methods applicable to public health issues are identified; most environmental risk methods are current and applicable to public health issues.Environmental risk methods applicable to public health issues are identified; environmental risk methods are current and applicable to public health issues, but more supporting detail is needed. Environmental risk methods applicable to public health issues are clearly identified; environmental risk methods are current, applicable and highly relevant to public health issues.Propose Modifier, New Prevention or Intervention Program 20.0%No modifier, new prevention or intervention program is suggested.Reference is made to a modifier, new prevention or intervention program. No evidence or details are offered for support.A modifier, new prevention or intervention program is suggested. Some evidence is provided for support, but suggestion lacks support to demonstrate relevance to local public health issue presented.A modifier, new prevention or intervention program is suggested. Evidence is provided that generally demonstrates support and relevance to local public health issue presented.A modifier, new prevention or intervention program.
DetailsIf counseling is all talk and no action it is not effe.docxalexandernmeredith30
Details:
If counseling is all talk and no action it is not effective counseling. The problem is that clients encounter many barriers in carrying out actions they identify in the counseling process.
Write a 750-1,000-word paper discussing action planning and overcoming barriers for client treatment. Please use headings and include the following in your paper:
Discuss the principles for effectively implementing an action plan.
Describe at least five barriers that might interfere with client implementation of the action plans that are created. Include a case example of each barrier.
Outline a counselor intervention that would help to overcome each barrier.
A list of your local community resources for different types of needs.
Outline an aftercare plan that utilized local community resources.
Include at least three scholarly references in your paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
This assignment meets the following CACREP Standards:
2.F.5.g. Essential interviewing, counseling, and case conceptualization skills.
2.F.5.i. Development of measurable outcomes for clients.
2.F.5.k. Strategies to promote client understanding of and access to a variety of community-based resources.
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
10.0 %
Principles for effectively implementing an action plan
Discussion of the principles for effectively implementing an action plan is not present or not discernible to the reader.
Discussion of the principles for effectively implementing an action plan is incomplete or flawed.
Discussion of the principles for effectively implementing an action plan is accurate and complete.
Discussion of the principles for effectively implementing an action plan is thorough and well-reasoned.
Discussion of the principles for effectively implementing an action plan is thorough and well-reasoned. Information provided is fully supported and rich in detail.
10.0 %
Barriers that might interfere with client implementation of the action plans, including a case example of each barrier
Discussion of the barriers that might interfere with implementation of the action plans.is not present or not discernible to the reader.
Discussion of the barriers that might interfere with implementation of the action plans is incomplete or flawed.
Discussion of the barriers that might interfere with implementation of the action plans is accurate and complete, including relevant examples illustrating the techniques provided.
Discussion of the barriers that might interfere w.
Executive Summary In this assignment, you will propose a quality.docxrhetttrevannion
Executive Summary
In this assignment, you will propose a quality improvement initiative from your place of employment that could easily be implemented if approved. Assume you are presenting this program to the board for approval of funding. Write an executive summary (750-1,000 words) to present to the board, from which the board will make its decision to fund your program or project. Include the following:
The purpose of the quality improvement initiative.
The target population or audience.
The benefits of the quality improvement initiative.
The interprofessional collaboration that would be required to implement the quality improvement initiative.
The cost or budget justification.
The basis upon which the quality improvement initiative will be evaluated.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the
LopesWrite Technical Support articles
for assistance.
RUBRIC
Attempt Start Date:
12-Aug-2019 at 12:00:00 AM
Due Date:
18-Aug-2019 at 11:59:59 PM
Maximum Points:
140.0
Executive Summary
No of Criteria: 11 Achievement Levels: 5
CriteriaAchievement LevelsDescriptionPercentageUnsatisfactory0.00 %Less Than Satisfactory75.00 %Satisfactory79.00 %Good89.00 %Excellent100.00 %Content80.0
Purpose of the Quality Improvement Initiative15.0The purpose of the quality improvement initiative is not provided.The purpose of the quality improvement initiative is incomplete, missing relevant information.The purpose of the quality improvement initiative is provided and meets the basic criteria for the assignment as indicated in the assignment instructions.The purpose of the quality improvement initiative meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail.The purpose of the quality improvement initiative meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, is provided in detail, and demonstrates higher level thinking by incorporating prior learning or reflective thought.Target Population or Audience13.0The target population or audience is not addressed.The target population or audience is incomplete, missing relevant information.The target population or audience is provided and meet the basic criteria for the assignment as indicated in the assignment instructions.The target population or audience meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail.The target population or audience meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail, while demonstrating higher level thinking by incorporating prior learning or .
Top of FormBottom of FormEnterprise Architecture Enables Proce.docxturveycharlyn
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Enterprise Architecture Enables Processes Paper
Purpose of this Assignment
This assignment gives you the opportunity to apply your critical thinking skills and understanding of the course concepts to explain how the enterprise architecture (EA) and/or the EA program supports the other IT management processes of an organization. This assignment specifically addresses the following course outcomes:
· describe enterprise architecture (EA), the appropriate application of EA frameworks, and an overall ongoing EA program
· analyze and examine how enterprise architecture and enterprise systems influence, support, and enable an organization's ability to contribute to strategic decision making and to respond and adapt to the business environment
· apply EA concepts to support business requirements and identify opportunities for enterprise solutions
Assignment
As you have learned throughout the course, EAs can be used to support a wide variety of information technology management processes, and an EA program strengthens IT management activities. A well-defined and implemented EA contributes significantly to each of the phases of the systems development life cycle (SDLC). For this assignment you will write a 3-5 page paper (not counting any cover sheet or reference pages) that explains briefly what enterprise architecture (EA) is and then how it supplements and enables each of the phases of the SDLC:
· initiation/planning/concept phase
· requirements analysis phase
· design phase
· development phase
· integration and testing phase
· implementation/deployment/support/maintenance phase
You should explain how EA enables each phase, how it fits into each phase, and what unique qualities or capabilities a well-defined EA contributes that might not otherwise be available to the organization.
The use of at least two external scholarly resources (other than class materials) is required. (NOTE: More than two external resources are required to receive all possible points; see Grading Rubric below.) You should use scholarly journals (rather than Wikipedia and author-less website postings). Remember to correctly cite and reference all sources using APA format.
Grading Rubric
Use the rubric below to be sure you have covered all aspects of the assignment.Criteria
90-100%
Far Above Standards
80-89%
Above Standards
70-79%
Meets Standards
60-69%
Below Standards
< 60%
Well Below Standards
Possible Points
Intro-duction
5 Points
A sophisticated introduction sets the stage for the paper.
4 Points
A well-written introduction sets the stage for the paper.
3.5 Points
The introduction adequately sets the stage for the paper.
3 Points
The introduction does not adequately set the stage for the paper.
0-2 Points
No introduction included.
5
Explana-tion of Enterprise Architec-ture
13-15 Points
Explanation is brief but clear; is complete enough to set the stage for the paper; and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of course concepts.
1 ...
OL 750 Individual Research PaperOverviewDuring the course, .docxhopeaustin33688
OL 750: Individual Research Paper
Overview
During the course, students will explore a number of topics of significant trends that will affect people at work over the next 30 years. Students are asked to write a paper on a topic, providing sufficient information to provide the reader with a deeper understanding of it and discussing the implications it has for self, organizations, society.
The paper should be comprehensive, well researched, having in depth analysis and displaying critical thinking skills. The topic should be relevant to the individual. It could be the future developments in their field or business or a topic that has excited the student and wish to explore further. Students should discuss the topic with the faculty member before commencing the investigation. This paper is due in Module Seven.
As part of your research you may choose to interview a leader engaged in your topic of interest. The document, Leadership Interview located in the Assignment Guidelines and Rubrics section of the course, provides a format for question asking. Use the Interview Consent form to obtain formal consent prior to the interview.
Main Elements
The research paper should include an extensive survey of the literature. It is expected that this research project will draw on a number of significant sources (minimum of 10), the majority of which must come from the Shapiro Library holdings, including electronic databases.
The following is a list of main elements that could be addressed:
1. Demographic Trends
2. Future Trends is HR
3. Recruitment and Retention
4. Trends in Government Intervention
5. Effects of Changing Technology on Traditional Business Models
6. Rebuilding of Public Trust
7. Fashion Trends
Rubric
Requirements of submission: Written components of projects must follow these formatting guidelines when applicable: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and discipline-appropriate citations. This paper should be 12 – 15 pages in length.
Instructor Feedback: Students can find their feedback in the grade book as an attachment.
Critical Elements
Distinguished
Proficient
Emerging
Not Evident
Value
Main Elements
Includes almost all of the main elements and requirements and cites multiple examples to illustrate each element
(23-25)
Includes most of the main elements and requirements and cites many examples to illustrate each element
(20-22)
Includes some of the main elements and requirements
(18-19)
Does not include any of the main elements and requirements
(0-17)
25
Inquiry and Analysis
Explores multiple issues through extensive collection and in-depth analysis of evidence to make informed conclusions
(18-20)
Explores some issues through collection and in-depth analysis of evidence to make informed conclusions
(16-17)
Explores minimal issues through collection and analysis of evidence to make informed conclusions
(14-15)
Does not explore issues through collection and analysis of evidence.
Clinical Assignment Quality Improvement Project Part 1GoalWilheminaRossi174
Clinical Assignment: Quality Improvement Project Part 1
Goal:
· To assess a clinical issue that is the focus of your Quality Improvement Project.
· Create a description of the clinical issue to be addressed in the project.
Content Requirements:
1. Identify the clinical issue that will be the focus of your Quality Improvement project.
2. Provide rationale for the need to change the status quo.
3. Identify best practices from the literature related to the issues.
Submission Instructions:
· The paper is to be clear and concise, and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.
· The paper is to be 2 - 3 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page.
· Incorporate a minimum of 3 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
· Journal articles and books should be referenced according to current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).
· Your paper should be formatted per current APA and references should be current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions)
· Complete and submit the assignment by 11:59 PM ET on Sunday.
· Note: this is first part of your Quality Improvement Project. You should revise/improve your work based on your professor's feedback. In module 7, you will be putting all the parts together to complete and submit your final project.
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeAssignment TitleTotal PointsNRS-493NRS-493-O501Capstone Project Topic Selection and Approval50.0CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good (89.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent80.0%Project Topic for Focus of Change Proposal5.0%The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is omitted.The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is presented but is largely incomplete.The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is summarized. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Some support is needed.The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.The problem or issue, intervention, quality initiative, educational need, or collaborative interprofessional team project that will be the focus of the change proposal is clearly and logically presented. Support and rationale are evident.Setting or Context Where Project Topic Is Observed10.0%Th ...
Due Date Thursday at 1159 pm of Unit 8 Points 100 .docxShiraPrater50
Due Date: Thursday at 11:59 pm of Unit 8
Points: 100
Overview:
As we have stated, self-assessment is a critical component of the Baldrige process.
Accordingly, this assignment will require you to engage in a reflective process and allow you to
develop and articulate your own thoughts on the concept of "quality", the Baldrige principles,
organizational issues, personal and organizational learning, corporate responsibility, and other
important ideas discussed in this course.
Instructions:
Your paper should cover:
A reflection of the Baldrige process and quality.
Organizational issues
Personal and organizational learning.
Corporate responsibility
Your paper should cover the issues above, address your learning experience in the course, and
identify areas of your greatest (or least, if necessary) development or understanding. A well-
developed paper will make reference to the Baldrige principles in a coherent and thoughtful
way, introduce new thinking if appropriate, and show an understanding of the course materials
and their application in an organizational or personal environment.
Please write clearly and in a grammatically correct manner. Remember, clarity of presentation
goes a long way in enhancing the credibility of the presentation.
Requirements:
Length: a minimum of five pages, not including title or reference pages
Resources: a minimum of four resources to back up your reflection
Demonstrate a depth of thought and consideration worthy of a course in quality systems.
The final product will be a paper that is double-spaced, APA formatted pages.
Be sure to read the criteria by which your work will be evaluated before you write and
again after you write.
BUS211 – Baldrige Principles and
Introduction to Quality
Unit 8 Assignment: Reflection Paper
Evaluation Rubric for Unit 8 Assignment
CRITERIA Exemplary Proficient Needs
Improvement
Deficient
(19-20 Points) (16-18 Points) (13-15 Points) (0-12 Points)
Reflection of
the Baldrige
Process and
Quality
The reflection
on the Baldrige
process is
clearly defined
and presented,
including all
details.
The reflection on
the Baldrige
process is
present, but is
missing minor
details.
The reflection on
the Baldrige
process is
present, but is
missing key
details.
The reflection
on the Baldrige
process is
missing or
poorly
presented.
Organizational
Issues
Organizational
issues are
clearly defined
and presented,
including all
details.
Organizational
issues are
present, but is
missing minor
details.
Organizational
issues are
present, but is
missing key
details.
Organizational
issues are
missing or
poorly
presented.
Personal and
Organizational
Learning
Personal and
organizational
learning is
clearly defined
and presented,
including all
details.
Personal and
organizational
learning is
present, but is
missing minor
details.
Personal and
organ ...
Due Date Thursday at 1159 pm of Unit 8 Points 100 .docxgertrudebellgrove
Due Date: Thursday at 11:59 pm of Unit 8
Points: 100
Overview:
As we have stated, self-assessment is a critical component of the Baldrige process.
Accordingly, this assignment will require you to engage in a reflective process and allow you to
develop and articulate your own thoughts on the concept of "quality", the Baldrige principles,
organizational issues, personal and organizational learning, corporate responsibility, and other
important ideas discussed in this course.
Instructions:
Your paper should cover:
A reflection of the Baldrige process and quality.
Organizational issues
Personal and organizational learning.
Corporate responsibility
Your paper should cover the issues above, address your learning experience in the course, and
identify areas of your greatest (or least, if necessary) development or understanding. A well-
developed paper will make reference to the Baldrige principles in a coherent and thoughtful
way, introduce new thinking if appropriate, and show an understanding of the course materials
and their application in an organizational or personal environment.
Please write clearly and in a grammatically correct manner. Remember, clarity of presentation
goes a long way in enhancing the credibility of the presentation.
Requirements:
Length: a minimum of five pages, not including title or reference pages
Resources: a minimum of four resources to back up your reflection
Demonstrate a depth of thought and consideration worthy of a course in quality systems.
The final product will be a paper that is double-spaced, APA formatted pages.
Be sure to read the criteria by which your work will be evaluated before you write and
again after you write.
BUS211 – Baldrige Principles and
Introduction to Quality
Unit 8 Assignment: Reflection Paper
Evaluation Rubric for Unit 8 Assignment
CRITERIA Exemplary Proficient Needs
Improvement
Deficient
(19-20 Points) (16-18 Points) (13-15 Points) (0-12 Points)
Reflection of
the Baldrige
Process and
Quality
The reflection
on the Baldrige
process is
clearly defined
and presented,
including all
details.
The reflection on
the Baldrige
process is
present, but is
missing minor
details.
The reflection on
the Baldrige
process is
present, but is
missing key
details.
The reflection
on the Baldrige
process is
missing or
poorly
presented.
Organizational
Issues
Organizational
issues are
clearly defined
and presented,
including all
details.
Organizational
issues are
present, but is
missing minor
details.
Organizational
issues are
present, but is
missing key
details.
Organizational
issues are
missing or
poorly
presented.
Personal and
Organizational
Learning
Personal and
organizational
learning is
clearly defined
and presented,
including all
details.
Personal and
organizational
learning is
present, but is
missing minor
details.
Personal and
organ.
WarningYou do not have permissions to perform this activityA.docxmelbruce90096
Warning
You do not have permissions to perform this activity
Assignment
Week 10 | Diversity in the Health Care Organization
Details:
1) Providers must learn new tools to eliminate disparities, build trust with patients, and understand how international biases and pre-established stereotypes affect quality of care. Write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) that identifies and defines various tools and measurements that can be used to measure the effectiveness of diversity programs and policies established by the organization.
2) Address how each of the following must be considered when considering how to implement an environment of diversity:
a) Government regulations.
b) Social pressures.
c) Industry and company ethical codes.
d) Tension between personal standards and the goals of the organization.
3) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
4) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
Top of Form
Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the "Submit" button under "Final Submission" is clicked.
New Attempt
Bottom of Form
Title
Attached Documents
Turnitin Report
Similarity Index
Final Submission
Click 'New Attempt' to start assignment or attach documents
Error Details
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Top of Form
Apply Rubrics
Addressing Diversity
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Content
40.0 %In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Does not demonstrate understanding of the issues surrounding diversity, including the implications. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the situation, and does not develop effective answers to the questions, with rationale.
Demonstrates only minimal understanding diversity. Demonstrates only minimal abilities for critical thinking and analysis of the case study, and develops weak answers to the questions, with minimal rationale
Demonstrates knowledge of issues surrounding diversity, but has some slight misunderstanding of the implications. Provides a basic idea of critical thinking and analysis for the questions, answers, and rationale. Does not include examples or descriptions.
Demonstrates acceptable knowledge of the issues surrounding diversity (in your own words). Develops an acceptable response and rationale for it. Utilizes some examples.
Demonstrates thorough knowledge of the issues surrounding diversity and their implications. Clearly answers the questions and develops a very strong rationale. Introduces appropri.
1Unsatisfactory0.002Less than Satisfactory74.003.docxvickeryr87
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
40.0 %Quality Tool Analysis
A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement, root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools you used to identify and vet the problem is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary of how you arrived at the problem is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.
A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement, root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools you used to identify and vet the problem makes weak connections with several gaps in presentation. An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary of how you arrived at the problem makes weak connections with several gaps in presentation. Supporting sources are present and that show limited understanding of the content.
A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement, root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools you used to identify and vet the problem makes connections at a cursory level and contains minimal gaps. An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary of how you arrived at the problem is at a cursory level and makes connections containing minimal gaps. Supporting sources are present and show some understanding of the content.
A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement, root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools you used to identify and vet the problem is clear and integrated, and makes meaningful connections with no gaps. An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary of how you arrived at the problem is clear and integrated, and makes meaningful connections with no gaps. Supporting sources are present that illustrate the understanding of the content.
A quality tool analysis that includes a problem statement, root-cause analysis, and explanation of which quality tools you used to identify and vet the problem is thorough and well integrated and makes meaningful connections with no gaps. An explanation of quantitative and qualitative tools you used and a summary of how you arrived at the problem is thorough and well integrated, and makes meaningful connections with no gaps. Supporting sources are present that illustrate a deep understanding of the content.
30.0 %Stakeholder Analysis
A stakeholder analysis that includes a power interest grid and a summary of all considerations for all stakeholders is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.
A stakeholder analysis that includes a power interest grid and a summary of all considerations for all stakeholders makes weak connections with several gaps in presentation. Supporting sources are present and that show limited understanding of the content.
A stakeholder analysis that includes a power interest grid and a summary of all considerations.
Group Member Discussion RubricStudent NameTotal Points PossibleTot.docxwhittemorelucilla
Group Member Discussion RubricStudent NameTotal Points PossibleTotal Points ReceivedLate Work Percentage (select from drop down menu)Late Work DeductionFinal Points Received 750.000%
Windows User: Windows User:
Select dropdown menu for percentage deducted for late work.0.000.00CriterionSuperior Criteria (100%)Excellent Criteria (95%)Satisfactory Criteria (85%)Marginal Criteria (75%)Unacceptable Criteria (0%)Points Possible Evaluation (select from drop down menu)Points ReceivedFaculty FeedbackElement 1: Initial Posting Content for Weeks 2, 4, 6 (28 points maximum; 37% of total points)Student provides an original, thought-provoking, in-depth initial post addressing more than one summative consideration. The student's post stimulates critical inquiry and uses at least five additional scholarly resources to support thinking.Student provides an original, thought-provoking, in-depth initial post addressing more than one summative consideration. The student's post stimulates critical inquiry and uses at least five additional scholarly resources to support thinking. However, there are one or two minor errors in the content of the post.Student provides a good, organized post addressing at least one summative consideration, but does not consistently demonstrate higher-order thinking. The student's post stimulates some critical inquiry and uses at least five additional scholarly resources, but some details are lacking or not accurate. Student provides a weak or incomplete post addressing at least one summative consideration. The student's post demonstrates a low level of thinking and/or resources are lacking and/or do not support thinking.Does not meet minimal standards.280%
Windows User: Windows User:
Select drop down menu for inputting grade for this criterion.0Element 2: Follow-up Responses to Colleagues and Interaction for Weeks 3, 5, 7 (27 points maximum; 36% of total points)Student engages with several peers bringing the discussion to a higher level of inquiry and investigation. Responses are thorough and fully contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes.
Student engages with several peers bringing the discussion to a higher level of inquiry and investigation. Responses are thorough and fully contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes. However, there are one or two minor errors in content of responses.Student engages with at least two peers and helps extend the discussion. Responses are good and somewhat contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes. Student engages with at least two peers. Responses are minimal and do not fully contribute to the q ...
Introduction to Epidemiology Course Project Detailed Article Cri.docxmariuse18nolet
Introduction to Epidemiology Course Project
Detailed Article Critique
Reading, interpreting, and judging the value of epidemiologic literature is a skill that you will exercise throughout your academic career in public health and beyond. To help prepare you for your thesis or capstone experience as well as future coursework, your project this term involves writing a detailed critique of an article. (See link in blackboard.) Construct your critique using complete paragraphs. DO NOT present your critique as an outline.
Please consult the table on the next page to ensure that your review includes the required major elements for this assignment. We will use this table in our evaluation of your project. Each element is worth a specified number of points. Please understand that full credit will not be awarded for simply mentioning each element. You must justify your assessment. For example, you cannot simply state, “The authors justified the importance of their study.” You need to point out how the authors did or did not meet each criterion. Your critique should not be longer than 4-6 pages double-spaced with one-inch margins. There is no minimum page requirement.
For additional assistance, please refer to the article by Young et al. (2009) that is also posted in Blackboard along with the article that you are to review.
See next page for more details. ( ( ( ( ( (
Name___________________________
Element
Possible Points
Grade
Objectives:
· What is/are the research question(s) addressed by this study?
· Did the authors justify the need for their study? What was it?
5
5
Study Design:
· Describe the study design and methods used for the study.
· Critique the overall design by addressing the following:
· Did the authors correctly identify their study design (e.g., the authors stated that their study was a cohort study when it really was a cross-sectional study)?
· Did the authors present clear definitions of their exposure/health outcomes?
· Did the authors adequately describe their sampling (e.g., convenience, consecutive, or random; response rate; study population) and data collection methods (e.g., questionnaire, records, biomarkers, surveys, etc.)?
15
10
Analysis:
· Describe the data analysis plan overall.
· Critique the analysis plan by addressing the following:
· Is the analysis appropriate for the study design (considering you level of statistical knowledge)? Was potential confounding addressed in the analysis stage? If so, how?
· Are the tables and graphs well organized and labeled? Do the tables and graphs provide enough data for reader to draw their own conclusions (e.g. do they stand alone?)?
· Are the findings within the tables/figures consistent? Is each table/figure consistent with the text and other tables/figures?
· Can the findings be attributed simply to chance?
5
10
Validity and Conclusions:
· Internal validity- Consider the potential for selection bias, information bias, and .
Similar to Essay Rubric Criteria Rating Points Exceeds Exp (20)
Nine-year-old Wandas teacher notices that for the past few weeks,.docxTanaMaeskm
Nine-year-old Wanda's teacher notices that for the past few weeks, Wanda has not been talking to her friends and is always sitting alone in a corner. After talking to Wanda's friends, the teacher finds out that Wanda's sixteen-year-old brother was killed in a gang fight two months ago and her parents have since separated. The teacher talks to her friend Daphne, a counselor, to see if there is anything she can do about Wanda. She wants to know if there is any way in which children and families affected by exposure to violence can be assisted with emotional impact of these events. The teacher also asks Daphne, in the role of a counselor, to call Wanda's parents to see if they would be willing to talk with her about the death of their son, their separation, and Wanda's behavior at school. Daphne is not employed or affiliated with the school.
What would be Daphne's role, as a counselor, in helping the teacher?
What do you see as important roles of a counselor working in a community?
What are the ethical responsibilities that counselors and human services professionals hold toward the community? When answering this question identify the ethical code number and definition, using your own words, of the ethical responsibilities of these professionals.
Briefly speak how you, as an ethical counselor, would respond to the teacher's request for you to speak with Wanda and her family.
DUE TODAY 10/25/16 @6PM eastern time
.
Newspapers frequently feature stories on how various democratic prin.docxTanaMaeskm
Newspapers frequently feature stories on how various democratic principles and processes contribute to democratic governance and impact a wide variety of issues, ranging from the distribution of flu vaccines to the appropriate legal venue for terrorist trials. Public policies that are formulated to address such issues come about as the result of the influence and application of various democratic principles and processes. In addition, competing interests and factions engage in the democratic process using tools such as lobbying or elections in an effort to leverage public policy. As you think about democratic principles and processes for this Assignment, take note of where you see their influence in recent public policy issues. To prepare for this Assignment: • Review the article “War v. Justice: Terrorism Cases, Enemy Combatants, and Political Justice in U.S. Courts” in this week’s Learning Resources. Take note of key democratic principles explained. Consider how the democratic principles in the article might influence public policy. • Review the articles “Strategic Lobbying: Demonstrating How Legislative Context Affects Interest Groups’ Lobbying Tactics” and “The Study of Party Factions as Competitive Political Organizations” in this week’s Learning Resources. • Think about the democratic processes used by lobbying groups and political factions to influence public policy. • Select a public policy issue related to your specialization or to an area with which you are familiar. • Select three democratic principles and/or processes that you think might influence the formulation of public policy related to your issue. • Reflect on how these principles and processes of democracy influence the formulation of the public policy you selected. The Assignment (2–3 pages): • Briefly describe the public policy issue you selected for this Assignment. • Using three democratic principles and/or processes of your choice, explain how you think these democratic principles and/or processes influence the formulation of public policy. • Based on your analysis, share at least one insight you gained about the influence of democratic principles and processes on the formulation of public policy. Or, if you live outside the United States, explain how these democratic principles might affect governance in your country.
.
Nice thought process and good example of foot into the door” ).docxTanaMaeskm
Nice thought process and good example of “foot into the door” :)!
You also appear to be a very smart person when it comes to being ware of other that may take advantage of one’s
Kindness!
Why do you think some people take advantage of the “foot into the door” in a negative way? What are your views on this? Other students may chime in! I love to hear
your views!!!!
Thanks for sharing and stay positive!
.
NIST and Risk Governance and Risk Management Please respond to the.docxTanaMaeskm
"NIST and Risk Governance and Risk Management" Please respond to the following:
NIST provides many procedures and much guidance on IT and information security-related topics.
Assess if NIST is too large and attempts to cover too many topics. Decide if NIST should separate into different entities for different major areas, such as IT governance, risk management, information security, and others.
Assess if the various NIST documents covering risk management topics and concepts are too spread out and should be more consolidated to provide better guidance to organizations when they are establishing risk management programs.
.
Nice thought process ;)!Some in social media agree with your v.docxTanaMaeskm
Nice thought process ;)!
Some in social media agree with your views:"… involving a breakdown in the relation between thought, emotion, and behavior,”.
Santrock (2006) support your views on this topic and also noted that one main type of schizophrenia is cationic (exhibits bizarre behavior, frequently causes immobile stupor
).
Do you think most people are aware that there are more than one type of schizophrenia?
What are your views on this?
Other students may chime in! I would love to hear your views ;)!
.
Newsletter pertaining to an oceanographic environmental issue 1500.docxTanaMaeskm
Newsletter pertaining to an oceanographic environmental issue
1500 words with minimum of 6 references.
must be submitted by Dec 10
Please do the newsletter talks about the Chinese fishery, mainly focus on the damage they made to the environment.
1500 words , with some well-designed pictures
due dec10th
please do more than 6 references, use the information get from references
please follow the format if the sample I attached.
.
Nicole Martins is the controller at UMC Corp., a publicly-traded man.docxTanaMaeskm
Nicole Martins is the controller at UMC Corp., a publicly-traded manufacturing company. Last year, UMC had annual sales revenue of $15 million. The first quarter of this year just ended, and Nicole needs to prepare a trial balance so she can prepare the quarterly financial statements. However, trial balance is out of balance by $750 (credits exceed debits).
Nicole is running out of time as the report is due today! Therefore, she decides to balance by plugging the $750 into the Equipment account. She chose the Equipment account because it has the largest account balance. Therefore, with the $750 added, it will be the least-misstated account.
Identify the stakeholders in the case.
Explain the ethical issues the case involves.
If you were Nicole, what would you do?
.
New and Orignal work. Please cite in MLA citation and use in text ci.docxTanaMaeskm
New and Orignal work. Please cite in MLA citation and use in text citations for the other sources you use. This essay is two pages long. I will list the poems this essay will be on below. Please highlight where you cite these poems so I can know where to add the in text citation. I need this essay completed by 8:00 pm sunday.
Theme: Loss of faith in institutional, cultural, and social foundation that could provide stability in the world
Poems: T.S. Eliot " The Waste Land"
W.B. Yeats " The Second Coming"
James Joyce "Ulysses"
.
New and Origninal work. The topic is already provided below and I ne.docxTanaMaeskm
New and Origninal work. The topic is already provided below and I need it to be 2 pages no limit on word count. Make sure it is MLA cited and the paragraghs are detailed explaining which charasteristic you are referring to. The writings are coming from the Norton Anthology English Literature Book The Victorian Age Volume E. I have attached the three writings from the book that I would like you to use for this essay. Let me know if you need a better copy scanned and I will be happy to rescan it.
Assignment Description
: Write a short (2 page) essay using selections from the texts that demonstrate the characteristic below.
Remember it takes more than 2 data points to indicate a trend. You will need to
choose 3 different writers
to show there was a prevailing tendency toward the characteristic you choose.
Explain fully how the characteristic is shown by detailed explication of the works you choose. Make sure references are integrated and cited according to MLA conventions.
Literature of this age tends to come closer to daily life and reflects its practical problems and interests. It becomes a powerful instrument for human progress. Socially & economically, industrialism was on the rise as well as various reform movements such as emancipation, child labor, women’s rights, and evolution.
.
New essay -- minimum 300 words3 resources used NO cover sheet or.docxTanaMaeskm
New essay -- minimum 300 words
3 resources used
NO cover sheet or headers
Must use Harris book as one of the sources-- I am attaching the 2 chapters needed (be sure to site pages).
Essay is on:
What do Harris and others suggest as a hypothesis to explain patterns of people-eating and insect-eating? Why is it more common in certain societies than in others?
.
Neurological DisordersNeurological disorders, such as headaches, s.docxTanaMaeskm
Neurological Disorders
Neurological disorders, such as headaches, seizure disorders, sleep disorders, depression, and dementia, can present several complications for patients of all ages. These disorders affect patients physically and emotionally, impacting judgment, school and/or job performance, and relationships with family and friends. Since these disorders may have drastic effects on patients’ lives, it is important for advanced practice nurses to effectively manage patient care. With patient factors and medical history in mind, it is the nurse’s responsibility to assist physicians in the diagnosis, treatment, and education of patients with neurological disorders.
To prepare:
·
Review this week’s media presentations on the nervous system.
·
Select one of the following neurological disorders: headaches, seizure disorders, sleep disorders, depression, or dementia. Consider the pathophysiology, as well as the types of drugs that would be prescribed to patients to treat your selected disorder.
·
Select one of the following factors: genetics, gender, ethnicity, age, or behavior. Consider how the factor you selected might impact the pathophysiology of the disorder. Then, reflect on how this factor might impact the effects of prescribed drugs, as well as measures you might take to help reduce any negative side effects.
·
Locate an agency that provides patient education on your selected disorder and review the available materials and curriculum. Consider how you might be able to use those materials to educate a patient on the disorder, treatment options, management, and self-care.
Questions to be addressed in my paper:
1.
A description of the neurological disorder you selected, including its pathophysiology and types of drugs that would be prescribed to treat patients.
2.
Explain how the factor you selected might impact the pathophysiology of the disorder, as well as the effects of prescribed drugs.
3.
Include a description of measures you might take to help reduce any negative side effects.
4.
Finally, explain how you would use materials from a supporting agency to educate patients on the disorder, treatment options, management, and self-care.
5.
Summary with Conclusion
REMINDERS:
1)
2-3 pages (addressing the 4 questions above excluding the title page and reference page).
2)
Kindly follow APA format for the citation and references! References should be between the period of 2011 and 2016. Please utilize the references at least three below as much as possible and the rest from yours.
3)
Make headings for each question.
References:
Readings
·
Huether, S. E., & McCance, K. L. (2012).
Understanding pathophysiology
(Laureate custom ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
o
Chapter 12, “Structure and Function of the Neurologic System”
This chapter begins with an overview of the structure and function of the nervous system. It also explains the importance of the central, peripheral, and autonomic nervous systems.
o
Chapter 13, “Pain, Tempe.
Neurodevelopmental and Neurocognitive Disorders Paper··I.docxTanaMaeskm
Neurodevelopmental and Neurocognitive Disorders Paper
·
·
Instructions
Assignment FilesGrading
Write
a 1,500- to 1,750-word paper on the following:
Describe one neurodevelopmental disorder and one neurocognitive disorder.
Discuss behavioral criteria for each disorder.
Discuss incidence rates and causes for each disorder.
Propose two options for treatment for each disorder, based on two different theoretical models.
Format
your paper consistent with APA guidelines.
Provide references
.
Needs to be done by 8pm central time!!!!!!An important aspect .docxTanaMaeskm
Needs to be done by 8pm central time!!!!!!
An important aspect of a research study is the ability to analyze data and then describe the statistics derived from that data in a form that is easy to understand and interpret. For quantitative data, this can include representing the data visually through tables, diagrams, and graphs. Review the quantitative descriptive statistic examples in the sport involvement article.
2-3 pages APA Format.
message for extra information.
.
Need to know about 504 plan and IEP. I need to research the process.docxTanaMaeskm
Need to know about 504 plan and IEP. I need to research the process of determining a child with OHI (Other Health Inpairment. 1 of the sources needs to be DPI (Department of Public Instruction for Wisconsin). I would like a power point presentaion along with what I should be said with each slide. APA format
.
Nelson Carson is a 62-year-old man who presents to his private pract.docxTanaMaeskm
Nelson Carson is a 62-year-old man who presents to his private practitioner’s office with a hacking, raspy cough.
Subjective Data
PMH: HTN, CAD
Cough is productive, bringing up green, thick phlegm
Runny nose, sore throat
No history of smoking or seasonal allergies
Complains of fatigue
Objective Data
Vital signs: T 37 P 72 R 14 BP 134/64
Lungs: + Rhonchi bilateral upper lobes, wheezes
O2 Sat = 98%
Medications: Metoprolol 25 mg per day, ASA 325 mg/daily
What other questions should the nurse ask about the cough?
What nursing diagnoses can be derived from the data?
What should be included in the plan of care?
What risk factors are associated with this age group?
Based on the readings, what is the most likely cause of cough for this patient?
Apa format
Reference
Jarvis, C. (2016).
Physical examination & health assessment
(7th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.
Chapter 18: Thorax and Lungs
pp. 413–441 (Structure, Function, The Thoracic Cavity, Developmental Competence, Subjective Data, Objective Data)
Chapter 19: Heart and Neck Vessels
pp. 459–492 (Structure and Function, Heart Wall, Chambers, and Valves, Heart Sounds, Developmental Competence, Subjective Data, Objective Data )
Chapter 20: Peripheral Vascular System and Lymphatic System
pp. 509–529 (Structure and Function, Lymphatics, Developmental Competence, Subjective Data, Objective Data)
.
Negotiation strategiesUsing the text Negotiation Readings, Exerc.docxTanaMaeskm
Negotiation strategies
Using the text “Negotiation: Readings, Exercisers, and Cases” by Lewicki, prepare a 1,400-1,750-word paper in which you analyze the possible intervention strategies. Apply what you believe to be the best strategy and explain how it should resolve the conflict. In case your best strategy does not work, or is rejected, develop and describe at least one contingency plan.
Instructions
Major points are stated clearly; are supported by specific details, examples, or analysis; and are organized logically.
1) Article Employs Negotiation strategy
2) Described Negotiation process
3) Compared and contrasted both strategies / work / home
Responsible for combining all sections, editing for flow, uploading draft for team review, submitting the final assignment (on time)
Expand view
.
Needs quotes and needs to be citied!!about 2 pages.NO PLAGARISM..docxTanaMaeskm
Needs quotes and needs to be citied!!
about 2 pages.
NO PLAGARISM. Looking for authetnitc work.
MLA
Summary from the following sections.
Vatican II. Gaudium et Spes. 1965. 12-18. Print. [available in Many are Called]
Rahner, Karl. Theological Investigations. Trans. C. Ernst. London: Darton, Longman & Todd, 1966. Print. [available in Many are Called]
Vol. 6, 390-398
Vol. 14, 280-294
Wong, Norman. "Karl Rahner’s Concept of the ‘Anonymous Christian’ An Inclusivist View of Religions." Church and Society, 4.1 (2001): 23-39. Print. [available in Many are Called] (Optional reading)
.
need to work on my present assignment using my last assignment as .docxTanaMaeskm
need to work on my present assignment using my last assignment as source
need 3 pages document and 1 page reference
Should concentrate on what authors discuss on that specific topic
Should be in IEEE Format
No Plagiarism
Willing to do changes references should be in IEEE format Important
• 1st attachment is question for the assignment
• 2nd attachment is topic you need to work on this project
• 3rd attachment my project should be also in same format
.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
This is a presentation by Dada Robert in a Your Skill Boost masterclass organised by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan (EFSS) on Saturday, the 25th and Sunday, the 26th of May 2024.
He discussed the concept of quality improvement, emphasizing its applicability to various aspects of life, including personal, project, and program improvements. He defined quality as doing the right thing at the right time in the right way to achieve the best possible results and discussed the concept of the "gap" between what we know and what we do, and how this gap represents the areas we need to improve. He explained the scientific approach to quality improvement, which involves systematic performance analysis, testing and learning, and implementing change ideas. He also highlighted the importance of client focus and a team approach to quality improvement.
The Indian economy is classified into different sectors to simplify the analysis and understanding of economic activities. For Class 10, it's essential to grasp the sectors of the Indian economy, understand their characteristics, and recognize their importance. This guide will provide detailed notes on the Sectors of the Indian Economy Class 10, using specific long-tail keywords to enhance comprehension.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Sectors of the Indian Economy - Class 10 Study Notes pdf
Essay Rubric Criteria Rating Points Exceeds Exp
1. Essay Rubric
Criteria Rating Points
Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Does Not Meet
Expectations
Organization & Structure
Introduction
Thesis position is clearly stated,
adequately describes the structure
of the essay, and invites reader's
attention.
(18-20)
Some weakness related to the
presentation of structure of the
essay.
(15-17)
2. No attempt is made to state the
thesis or position is vagu, and/or
there is no description the
structure of the essay.
(0-14)
20
Body
Body includes strong and relevant
supporting details that logically
align with the position of the
author. Essay body is logically
sequenced and cohesive with the
essay thesis. Each body paragraph
presents complete ideas/
supporting details.
(36-40)
Body includes relevant supporting
details that logically align with the
position of the author. Some
weakness in logic, organization, or
paragraph structure.
3. (30-35)
Body fails to include relevant
supporting details with the
author’s position. Essay body lacks
coherence and does not align with
the essay thesis. Body paragraphs
present incomplete and/or
incoherent ideas/supporting
details. Position is difficult to
articulate.
(1-29)
40
Grammar and Usage
Essay is free of grammatical and
spelling errors. Technical
terminology, words from other
languages, and words from other
historical periods are explained and
used correctly. Sentences are clearly
written and free of run-ons. Reader
is able to fully comprehend the
meaning of the narrative.
(27-30)
Essay contains a few minor
4. grammatical and/or spelling
errors. Paragraphs contain minor
errors such as word misusage, run-
on sentences, and wordy
sentences. Sentences are generally
clearly written. Contains no more
than a few minor errors, which do
not adversely affect the reader’s
ability to understand the essay.
(22-26)
Paper contains numerous
grammatical and spelling errors,
and misused words. Paragraphs
are wordy, contain multiple run-on
sentences, and are unclear.
Reader has a difficult time
understanding the essay because
of errors and poor sentence
structure.
(0-21)
30
Conclusion
5. Conclusion clearly and effectively
summarizes main points mentioned
in the essay body, presents new
information to the reader, and
closes with supporting details
mentioned in the essay body.
(9-10)
Some weakness in summarizing
main points of essay and/or there
is presentation of new material.
(7-8)
Conclusion is vague, does not
summarize topics mentioned in
the essay body, does not present
new information to the reader,
and/or fails to effectively close the
essay with supporting details from
the essay body.
(0-7)
10
6. Content Quality
Research Sources
Presents a variety of reputable and
relevant sources to support author’s
position. Cites all sources of
information referred to in essay. All
sources are properly formatted
according to APA style (7th edition).
(27-30)
Sources may lack variety and/or
may be of poor quality. Some
citations may be missing or minor
errors in use of APA style (7th
edition).
(22-26)
Essay does not utilize reputable
sources to support author’s
position. Sources referred to in the
essay are not cited. Sources are
not properly cited according to
APA style (7th edition).
(0-21)
7. 30
Analysis
*Descriptive ethics paper:
Assessment of the conditions and
factors that contributed to unethical
behavior in the organization.
*Normative ethics paper: Clear link
to ethical frameworks presented in
the course. Multiple perspective
offered on ethical issue addressed.
(27-30)
Some weakness in either
assessment of factors contributing
to unethical behavior or in linkage
to framework to the course.
(22-26)
Underlying logic has major flaws;
connection to position is not clear.
Connections to position are
incorrect or unclear or just a
repetition of the events without
explanation.
8. (0-21)
30
Compliance
Word Length
Essay is within required word
length.
(9-10)
Essay is with 20 percent of word
requirement.
(7-8)
Essay is more than 20 percent
outside of word limit.
(0-6)
10
In-Text Citation
9. In-text citations, footnotes, and
bibliography correctly follows APA
style (7th edition) format.
(9-10)
In-text citations, footnotes, and
bibliography generally follows APA
style (7th edition) format; essay
contains a few minor errors.
(7-8)
Fails to include in-text citations,
footnotes, and bibliography.
(0-6)
10
Proper Formatting
Essay follows formatting
requirements stated in assignment
instructions posted on Canvas.
(9-10)
10. Essay generally follows formatting
requirements stated in assignment
instructions posted on Canvas;
essay contains a few minor errors.
(7-8)
Essay does not follow formatting
requirements stated in assignment
instructions posted on Canvas.
(0-6)
10
On-Time Submission
Submitted by required due date.
(9-10)
Submitted more than three days
late.
(7-8)
Not submitted by required due
date.
11. (0-6)
10
D A Y 3 0
Community-
Based
Interventions
Presentation Overview
Announcements
Community-Based Interventions
Activity
Homework
Source: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/analyze/where-
to-start/design-community-
interventions/main
What is an intervention?
PROGRAM
12. __________
A PRACTICE WHICH BECOMES POPULAR
WHAT THEY DO
FOCUS:
INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIORS
_______________________
IMPROVE SITUATIONS IN WHICH BEHAVIORS HAPPEN
IMPROVE COMMUNITY
HEALTH
WELL-BEING
________________
ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO EDUCATE ON THE ISSUE YOU
ARE ADDRESSING
__________________
UNDERSTAND MORE
THEORIES
CHOOSING
DESIGNING
DEVELOPING
Why should you develop interventions?
Source: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/analyze/where-
to-start/design-community-interventions/main
13. When should you develop an
intervention?
WHEN THERE IS AN ISSUE OR PROBLEM
YOU/YOUR ORGANIZATION HAS
RESOURCES
____________
DESIRE
YOU/YOUR GROUP ARE RIGHT TO AID THE ISSUE OR
PROBLEM
Source: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/analyze/where-
to-start/design-community-interventions/main
How do you develop an intervention?
Source: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/analyze/where-
to-start/design-community-interventions/main
"DECIDE WHAT NEEDS TO HAPPEN"
"WHAT BEHAVIOR NEEDS TO CHANGE?"
"WHOSE BEHAVIOR NEEDS TO CHANGE?"
"IF PEOPLE ARE GOING TO CHANGE THEIR
BEHAVIOR, WHAT CHANGES IN THE ENVIRONMENT
NEED TO OCCUR TO MAKE IT HAPPEN? FOR
EXAMPLE, IF YOU WANT PEOPLE TO RECYCLE, YOU'LL
HAVE MUCH BETTER RESULTS IF THERE IS EASY
ACCESS TO RECYCLING BINS."
______________________________
14. How do you develop an intervention?
Source: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/analyze/where-
to-start/design-community-interventions/main
"USE A MEASUREMENT SYSTEM TO GATHER INFO
ABOUT THE LEVEL OF THE PROBLEM"
MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS
"DIRECT OBSERVATIONS OF BEHAVIOR. FOR EXAMPLE,
YOU CAN WATCH
WHETHER MERCHANTS SELL ALCOHOL TO PEOPLE
UNDER THE AGE OF
21."
"BEHAVIORAL SURVEYS. FOR EXAMPLE, THE YOUTH
RISK BEHAVIOR
SURVEY OF THE U.S. CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL
AND PREVENTION
ASKS QUESTIONS ABOUT DRUG USE, UNPROTECTED
SEXUAL ACTIVITY,
AND VIOLENCE."
_____________________________
"REVIEW OF ARCHIVAL OR EXISTING RECORDS. FOR
EXAMPLE, WE MIGHT
LOOK AT RECORDS OF THE RATE OF ADOLESCENT
PREGNANCY,
UNEMPLOYMENT, OR CHILDREN LIVING IN POVERTY
How do you develop an intervention?
Source: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/analyze/where-
to-start/design-community-interventions/main
"DECIDE WHO THE INTERVENTION SHOULD HELP"
15. EXAMPLES
CHILDHOOD IMMUNIZATION PROGRAM--> CHILDREN
__________________
INCREASE GUARDIANS TO GET KIDS IMMUNIZATIONS--
>TARGET PARENTS & BENEFIT KIDS
__________: INDIVIDUALS IN WHICH ONE IS AIMING TO
CHANGE
____________: INDIVIDUALS WHO AIDE IN THE CHANGE
How do you develop an intervention?
Source: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/analyze/w here-
to-start/design-community-interventions/main
"INVOLVE POTENTIAL CLIENTS OR END USERS OF
THE INTERVENTION"
ASK
______________
BECOMES THEIR PROGRAM-"OWNERSHIP"
How do you develop an intervention?
Source: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/analyze/where-
to-start/design-community-interventions/main
"ID THE ISSUES OR PROBLEMS YOU WILL ATTEMPT TO
SOLVE
TOGETHER:
16. COMMON WAYS TO TALK WITH SOMEONE IMPACTED:
"INFORMAL PERSONAL CONTACT - JUST TALKING WITH
PEOPLE,
AND SEEING WHAT THEY HAVE TO SAY"
"INTERVIEWS
__________
COMMUNITY FORUMS
CONCERNS SURVEYS"
UNDERLYING ISSUE
_________________________
http://ctb.ku.edu/en/community-tool-box-toc/community-
assessment/chapter-3-assessing-community-needs-and-
resources-8
http://ctb.ku.edu/en/community-tool-box-toc/community-
assessment/chapter-3-assessing-community-needs-and-
resources-41
How do you develop an intervention?
Source: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/analyze/where-
to-start/design-community-interventions/main
"ANALYZE THESE PROBLEMS OR THE ISSUE TO BE
ADDRESSED IN THE INTERVENTION"
ANSWER IMPORTANT QUESTIONS:
"WHAT FACTORS PUT PEOPLE AT RISK FOR (OR
PROTECT THEM AGAINST) THE PROBLEM OR CONCERN?
WHOSE BEHAVIOR (OR LACK OF BEHAVIOR) CAUSED
THE PROBLEM?
___________________
FOR WHOM IS THE SITUATION A PROBLEM?
17. WHAT ARE THE NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES FOR THOSE
DIRECTLY AFFECTED?
WHAT ARE THE NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES FOR THE
COMMUNITY?
_________________________
HOW DO THEY BENEFIT?
WHO SHOULD SHARE THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR
SOLVING THE PROBLEM?
WHAT BEHAVIORS NEED TO CHANGE TO CONSIDER THE
PROBLEM "SOLVED"?
WHAT CONDITIONS NEED TO CHANGE TO ADDRESS THE
ISSUE OR PROBLEM?
HOW MUCH CHANGE IS NECESSARY?
AT WHAT LEVEL(S) SHOULD THE PROBLEM BE
ADDRESSED? IS IT SOMETHING THAT SHOULD BE
ADDRESSED BY
INDIVIDUALS; BY FAMILIES WORKING TOGETHER; BY
LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS OR NEIGHBORHOODS; OR AT
THE
LEVEL OF THE CITY, TOWN, OR BROADER
ENVIRONMENT?
WILL YOU BE ABLE TO MAKE CHANGES AT THE
LEVEL(S) IDENTIFIED? THIS QUESTION INCLUDES
TECHNICAL
CAPABILITY, ENSURING YOU HAVE ENOUGH MONEY TO
DO IT, AND THAT IT IS GOING TO BE POLITICALLY
POSSIBLE.
How do you develop an intervention?
Source: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/analyze/where-
to-start/design-community-interventions/main
"SET GOALS & OBJECTIVES"
18. _______________________
**STARTING FROM THE FINISH LINE AND WORKING
BACKWARD
ANSWER THE FOLLOWING
"WHAT SHOULD THE INTERVENTION ACCOMPLISH? FOR
EXAMPLE, YOUR GOAL MIGHT BE
FOR MOST OF THE HOMELESS PEOPLE WHO ARE ABLE
TO HOLD JOBS DO SO BY THE END
OF THE INTERVENTION."
"WHAT WILL SUCCESS LOOK LIKE? IF YOUR
INTERVENTION IS SUCCESSFUL, HOW WILL
YOU KNOW IT? HOW WILL YOU EXPLAIN TO OTHER
PEOPLE THAT THE INTERVENTION
HAS WORKED? WHAT ARE THE "BENCHMARKS" OR
INDICATORS THAT SHOW YOU ARE
MOVING IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION?"
"FINALLY, WHAT ARE THE SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES YOU
WANT TO ACHIEVE? WHEN YOU ARE
WRITING DOWN YOUR OBJECTIVES, BE AS SPECIFIC AS
POSSIBLE. STATE HOW MUCH
CHANGE YOU WANT TO SEE HAPPEN IN WHAT
BEHAVIORS AND ACTIVITIES. BY WHOM? BY
WHEN?"
___________________________________
http://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/evaluate/evaluate-
community-initiatives/community-level-indicators/main
http://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/structure/strategic-
planning/create-objectives/main
How do you develop an intervention?
19. Source: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/analyze/where-
to-start/design-community-interventions/main
"LEARN WHAT OTHERS HAVE DONE"
_____________
MORE COMMON RESOURCES:
"SEE WHAT LOCAL EXAMPLES ARE AVAILABLE. WHAT
HAS WORKED IN YOUR COMMUNITY? HOW
ABOUT IN NEARBY PLACES? CAN YOU FIGURE OUT
WHY IT WORKED? IF POSSIBLE, TALK TO THE
PEOPLE RESPONSIBLE FOR THOSE APPROACHES, AND
TRY TO UNDERSTAND WHY AND HOW THEY
DID WHAT THEY DID."
"LOOK FOR EXAMPLES OF WHAT HAS BEEN DONE IN
ARTICLES AND STUDIES IN RELATED FIELDS.
SOURCES MIGHT BE PROFESSIONAL JOURNALS, SUCH
AS THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC
HEALTH, OR EVEN OCCASIONALLY, GENERAL NEWS
MAGAZINES. ALSO, LOOK AT INTERVENTIONS
THAT HAVE BEEN DONE FOR RELATED PROBLEMS--
PERHAPS THEY CAN BE ADAPTED FOR USE BY
YOUR GROUP. INFORMATION AND AWARENESS EVENTS,
FOR EXAMPLE, TEND TO BE GENERAL IN
NATURE--YOU CAN DO A SIMILAR EVENT AND CHANGE
WHAT IT'S FOR. A 5-K RACE MIGHT BE
PLANNED, FOR EXAMPLE, TO RAISE AWARENESS OF
AND MONEY FOR BREAST CANCER, TO PROTEST
ENVIRONMENTAL DESTRUCTION, AND SO ON."
_________________________________
How do you develop an intervention?
Source: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/analyze/where-
20. to-start/design-community-interventions/main
"BRAINSTORM IDEAS OF YOUR OWN"
WRITE IT DOWN
_____________
BE CREATIVE
How do you develop an intervention?
Source: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/analyze/where-
to-start/design-community-interventions/main
"TRY TO DECIDE WHAT INTERVENTIONS OR PARTS OF
INTERVENTIONS HAVE WORKED, AND WHAT MIGHT BE
APPLICABLE TO YOUR SITUATION"
AFFORD:
FINANCIALLY
POLITICALLY
_____
RESOURCE
CONSIDERING OTHER INTERVENTIONS, LOOK FOR:
"___________ - DO THEY FIT THE GROUP'S PURPOSE?"
"______ - DID THEY MAKE A DIFFERENCE ON BEHAVIOR
AND OUTCOME?"
"REPLICABLE - ARE THE DETAILS AND RESULTS OF
WHAT HAPPENED IN THE ORIGINAL
INTERVENTION EXPLAINED WELL ENOUGH TO REPEAT
WHAT WAS DONE? UNFORTUNATELY,
THIS ISN'T ALWAYS THE CASE--MANY PEOPLE, WHEN
YOU TALK TO THEM, WILL SAY, "OH! WE
JUST DID IT! "
"_______- IS IT CLEAR ENOUGH FOR PEOPLE IN YOUR
21. GROUP TO DO?"
"_________- DO WE HAVE THE TIME AND MONEY TO DO
THIS?"
"COMPATIBLE WITH YOUR SITUATION - DOES IT FIT
LOCAL NEEDS, RESOURCES, AND VALUES"
http://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/analyze/choose-and-
adapt-community-interventions/cultural-adaptation/main
How do you develop an intervention?
Source: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/analyze/where-
to-start/design-community-interventions/main
"ID BARRIERS & RESISTANCE YOU MIGHT COME UP
AGAINST"
"WHAT BARRIERS & RESISTANCE MIGHT WE FACE?"
________________________
"FOR EXAMPLE, A YOUTH GROUP TO PREVENT
SUBSTANCE ABUSE WANTED
TO OUTLAW SMOKING ON THE HIGH SCHOOL CAMPUS
BY EVERYONE,
INCLUDING THE TEACHERS AND OTHER STAFF
MEMBERS. HOWEVER, THEY
KNEW THEY WOULD COME UP AGAINST RESISTANCE
AMONG TEACHERS
AND STAFF MEMBERS WHO SMOKED. HOW MIGHT THEY
OVERCOME THAT
OPPOSITION?"
How do you develop an intervention?
22. Source: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/analyze/where-
to-start/design-community-interventions/main
"ID CORE COMPONENTS & ELEMENTS OF THE
INTERVENTION"
NUTS & BOLTS OF DESIGN'
BIG IDEAS
4 CLASSES WHEN IT COMES TO DESIGN
____________________
"ENHANCING SUPPORT AND RESOURCES"
____________
"MONITORING AND GIVING FEEDBACK"
_________________________________
How do you develop an intervention?
Source: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/analyze/where-
to-start/design-community-interventions/main
"DEVELOP AN ACTION PLAN TO CARRY OUT THE
INTERVENTION"
DEVELOPING AN ACTION PLAN, CONSIDER....
"WHAT COMPONENTS AND ELEMENTS WILL BE
IMPLEMENTED?
"WHO SHOULD IMPLEMENT WHAT BY WHEN?"
___________________
"WHAT POTENTIAL BARRIERS OR RESISTANCE ARE
EXPECTED?
HOW WILL THEY BE MINIMIZED?"
"WHAT INDIVIDUALS OR ORGANIZATIONS NEED TO BE
23. INFORMED? WHAT DO YOU NEED TO TELL THEM?"
How do you develop an intervention?
Source: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/analyze/where-
to-start/design-community-interventions/main
"PILOT-TEST YOUR INTERVENTION"
WORK OUT ANY ISSUES
PILOT TESTING DOING THIS..
"DECIDE HOW THE INTERVENTION WILL BE TESTED ON
A SMALL
SCALE"
__________________-
"PAY PARTICULAR ATTENTION TO UNINTENDED
CONSEQUENCES OR
SIDE EFFECTS THAT YOU FIND WHEN YOU EVALUATE
YOUR WORK"
"USE FEEDBACK FROM THOSE WHO TRIED THE
INTERVENTION TO
SIMPLIFY AND REFINE YOUR PLAN"
Wednesday
RA 17 Due by 11:59 pm Wednesday
Healthy People
CDC-Community-Based Interventions
https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-