Professor of Psychology Christina Salmivalli, University of Turku, Finland, at INVEST – Towards the Next Welfare State? EU side event, 4 Oct 2019, THL, Helsinki
Christina Salmivalli: KiVa antibullying program - From nationwide roll-out to international implementation
1. 1
KiVa® antibullying program: From nationwide
roll-out to international implementation
Professor Christina Salmivalli
University of Turku, Finland
www.kivaprogram.net
4. NOT feeling safe at school, %
(Finland, 2009)
4
Correlates significantly with being bullied
5. Bullying at school: a global concern
10-40 % victims
Serious short- and
long-term negative
consequences
Enormous human
suffering; costs to
societies
9. Universal
IndicatedMonitoring
KiVa®: based on best available evidence
9
Student lessons
Visible vests
for recess
supervisors
Online antibullying
games
KiVa™ team
Clear guidelines for
tackling bullying
Parent materials
Online surveys with
feedback of progress
29. Challenges
• High hopes lead to disappointments, too
• Implementation is a big challenge
• Healthy context paradox
29
30. Implementation challenge: two
examples
• When implementation suppport is lacking,
sustainability is threatened
30
Implementation of Kiva across years (Sainio et al., 2019):
Four-group model of 1,771 schools starting in 2009
31. Implementation challenge: two
examples
• When implementation suppport is lacking, fidelity
fades over time
– Johander et al., in preparation:
Annual reports from KiVa teams regarding the method they used to
tackle bullying
– Confronting / non-confronting / own adaptation / could not specify
31
32. Implementation challenge: two
examples
We also collected:
– Annual reports from Kiva team
members regarding the
effectiveness of their
interventions
– Annual reports from students
who had been bullied and
whose case was tackled by the
KiVa team: was it helpful?
32
Results (Johander et al., in preparation): Schools start adapting more over
time, although both KiVa team members and students find interventions
most helpful in schools utilizing the program-recommended methods
33. ”Healthy context paradox”
33
The negative impact of victimization seems to be especially
damaging in contexts where the overall level of victimization
is low, or decreasing over time
34. Pan, B., Tengfei, L., Linqin, J., Zhang, W., & Salmivalli, C. (in
preparation). Why does classroom-level victimization moderate the
victimization-depression association? The “healthy context
paradox” and two explanations.
Support for both social self-concept and lack of friends as
mediators
35. How can we become better in erasing
bullying?
• We have done some great progress in
developing, implementing, and evaluating
measures to prevent bullying
• It is time to focus on failure, not only on success
– Yes we have looked at (some) moderating
factors before, but our eyes are usually on
”whent it works, for whom it works” rather than
”when it doesn’t work, for whom it does not work”
• -> Focus on ”challenging cases”
36. Implementing Kiva abroad
• Belgium 2013
• European school network
2013
• The Netherlands 2014
• UK 2014
• New Zealand 2014
• Estonia 2015
• Sweden 2015
• Italy 2015
• Hungary 2015
• International schools in
Spain, Argentina, Mexico,
Peru, Columbia 2015
• Basque country 2016
• Chile 2016
• Spain 2017
• Ireland 2018
36
www.kivaprogram.net
39. ”More than a program”
• A global community of researchers, partner
organizations, KiVa trainers, schools…
– continuous development of effective tools to
ensure safe learning environment for all
39