SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 6
Download to read offline
ASSESSING THE INTEGRITY OF
PHARMACEUTICAL PACKAGING USING THE
SEPHA BLISTERSCAN AND CONVENTIONAL
BLUE DYE LEAK TESTING METHODS.



WHITE PAPER
OVERVIEW
01


     ASSESSING THE INTEGRITY OF PHARMACEUTICAL
     PACKAGING USING THE SEPHA BLISTERSCAN AND
     CONVENTIONAL BLUE DYE LEAK TESTING METHODS.
     Dr Dorian Dixon, Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials Institute,
     University of Ulster. February 2011.



     Overview                             A preliminary study was             free, 12µm holes or 20µm holes).
                                          conducted by Dr Dixon to            The model defects were laser
     A new whitepaper by a leading        determine the ability of            drilled in the approximate centre
     packaging expert from the            Blisterscan to identify defects     of the foil laminate covering
     University of Ulster, Dr Dorian      in a wide range of blister pack     each pocket and the dimensions
     Dixon, into the integrity of         designs. A Design of Experiment     of the holes were confirmed to
     pharmaceutical packaging has         approach was used to investigate    a tolerance of +/-2µm using an
     established that existing methods    the effect of pocket dimensions,    electron microscope.
     for testing the seal integrity of    foil thickness, pack material and
     blister packs are not as accurate    defect size on detection rates
     as newer, technology based test      by both Blisterscan
     equipment.                           and blue dye testing.
                                          This study found that
     In particular Dr Dixon found         the Blisterscan test
     that the laser based Blisterscan,    method detected
     manufactured in the UK by            100% of 15µm sized
     Sepha, was capable of detecting      holes while only 85%
     15% more product defects             of such defects were
     than traditional blue dye test       picked up by blue
     methods used by the majority of      dye testing.
     the pharmaceutical market. In
     a global market valued at over       In his whitepaper
     $40 billion per annum, where         study Dr Dixon
     quality control is of paramount      compared the ability
     importance, a 15% difference in      of Blisterscan and
     the ability to detect if a product   the blue dye test
     is sealed correctly or not is        to detect defective
     significant.                         pockets in blister
                                          packs. 30 cavity
     Dr Dixon’s whitepaper “Assessing     PVC thermoformed
     the Integrity of Pharmaceutical      packs sealed with a
     packaging using Sepha                25µm foil laminate
     Blisterscan and Blue Dye Testing”    were used, with
     comes on the back of internal        12µm or 20µm sized
     studies by Sepha highlighting        holes laser drilled in
     that Blisterscan, a laser based      the packs to create
     leak detection machine, was          defective packs. 90
     capable of identifying 50%           pockets were tested
     more defects in blister packs with   for each of the
     10 micron holes than blue dye        three sample types
     test methods.                        investigated (defect




     SEPHA WHITE PAPER
02

“DR DIXON STATES THAT THE APPROACH
IS PREFERABLE TO SYSTEMS THAT RELY
ON CONTACTING THE LID MATERIAL
WITH A PROBE IN ORDER TO MEASURE
PRESSURE OR DISPLACEMENT.”



The current industry standard        respond in a different manner
for testing blister pack             to a perfectly sealed pocket
integrity is blue dye testing,       when a vacuum is applied. Dr
which consists of placing a          Dixon states that the approach
selection of packs into blue         is preferable to systems that rely
stained water, subjecting the        on contacting the lid material
packs to a vacuum of typically       with a probe in order to measure
400-600mBar for several              pressure or displacement.
minutes and then removing
the vacuum, which allows any         Blisterscan testing consists of
defective pockets to take up the     initially scanning the surface of
dye. The packs are manually          each pocket in order to provide
deblistered and inspected for        a datum value for subsequent
dye ingress. This technique          deflection measurements.
relies on human subjectivity,        A vacuum level of 500mbar
and Dr Dixon states that it is       is then applied and held for
unlikely that the accuracy he        10 seconds and the pack re-
achieved in his laboratory tests     measured. Deflection refers
could be reproduced during           to the difference in average
routine factory quality control      height when the vacuum is
procedures.                          applied compared to the datum
                                     value. The vacuum level is then
Blisterscan is a dry, non-           reduced to 400mBar and held
destructive technique which uses     for a further 30 seconds before
a laser to measure changes in        the pack is scanned again. The
the pack profile which result from   variation in average height at
applying a vacuum. The lidding       the full and reduced vacuum is
material of defective pockets will   referred to as collapse.




                                                                          SEPHA WHITE PAPER
03




     Figure 1a.                                            Figure 1b.

     Blisterscan results of a pack containing a 30µm hole and a defect free pack

     Figure 1a illustrates the typical       was recorded for the defect free      after testing. The packs which
     difference in deflection behaviour      packed compared to only 4µm           were submerged in methylene
     measured by Blisterscan between         for the pack containing the 30µm      blue stained water and a vacuum
     a defect free pocket (bottom)           hole. A large hole i.e. one greater   of 500mBar was applied. This
     and one containing a 30µm sized         than ~20µm allows the pressure        vacuum level was maintained
     laser drilled defect (top). In Figure   inside the pocket to equalise to      for a soak time of 1 minute. The
     1 the black dotted line is the          the applied vacuum inhibiting foil    vacuum was then released with
     profile of the foil surface before      movement. Small holes manifest        the packs remaining in the dye
     the vacuum is applied. It can be        as a greater than normal              for a further period of 1 minute
     seen that a variation in profile        collapse when the vacuum level        to allow the dye to penetrate any
     exists between packs. The profiles      is reduced. This occurs as the air    defective pockets. The pockets
     after the full and reduced vacuum       slowly escapes through a small        were then opened and the
     is applied are shown by the green       defect allowing the pressure          contents visually inspected for
     and purple lines respectively.          inside the pocket to equalise with    signs of dye ingress.
                                             the applied vacuum.
     The solid blue line denotes the                                               Findings
     deflection, which is the difference     Once the packs had been
     between the profiles before and         tested by Blisterscan they were       Building on Dr Dixon’s initial
     after the vacuum is applied, while      then subjected to the blue dye        study where 100% of 15 micron
     the red line illustrates collapse       test. Extensive trials observed       holes were detected, Blisterscan
     (difference between profiles            that repeat testing packs on          went on to detect 100% of the
     at full and reduced vacuum).            BlisterScan had no observable         20 micron holes and 99% of
     It can be seen from Figure 1            effect on the deflection              the 12 micron holes in the final
     that the pack with a 30µm hole          behavior of the pack, or on           whitepaper study. Conversely
     does not deflect significantly          the dimensions of any defects.        blue dye testing was only capable
     from the initial profile when the       Multiple BlisterScan testing          of detecting 85% of the 15
     vacuum is applied. The defect           of the same defective pocket          micron holes, 90% of the 12
     free pocket (Figure 1b) however         produced repeatable results. The      micron holes and 99% of the 20
     displays a large deflection and         non-destructive nature of the         micron holes.
     adopts a domed profile as a             BlisterScan technique was also
     result of the applied vacuum. In        confirmed by electron microscopy
     this case a deflection of 410µm         analysis of defects before and




                                                                                   Figure 2: The destructive
                                                                                   effect of blue dye on a tablet




     SEPHA WHITE PAPER
04




                                      12µm Hole     15 µm Hole   20µm Hole   Defect Free

 Blisterscan detection accuracy          99%           100%       100%          100%

 Blue Dye detection accuracy             90%           85%        99%           100%

Table 1 : Blisterscan test accuracy vs Blue Dye test accuracy


Commenting on the results of
the whitepaper Dr Dixon said,
“Blisterscan testing is a rapid
                                      “BUILDING ON
non-destructive test method
which can detect the presence         DR DIXON’S INITIAL
of 12um, 15um and 20um sized
defects in pharmaceutical blister
packaging with a higher degree
                                      STUDY WHERE 100%
of reliability than conventional
blue dye testing.” Dr Dixon went
on to conclude that “The non-
                                      OF 15 MICRON HOLES
subjective nature of Blisterscan
testing removes the possibility
of human error and reliance
                                      WERE DETECTED,
on operator judgement, which
is a key element in the correct       BLISTERSCAN WENT
identification of small holes using
traditional blue dye testing.”
                                      ON TO DETECT 100%
As manufacturers seek to
improve their levels of quality
control and drive costs down,
                                      OF THE 20 MICRON
Blisterscan represents a
significant improvement over
traditional blue dye testing.
                                      HOLES AND 99%
Sepha believe that the accurate
and repeatable results proven         OF THE 12 MICRON
by this academic whitepaper,
mean that Blisterscan is the
definitive method for testing
                                      HOLES IN THE FINAL
blister packs in the modern global
pharmaceutical market.                WHITEPAPER STUDY.”




                                                                               SEPHA WHITE PAPER
Unit 25 Carrowreagh Business Park, Carrowreagh Road,
Dundonald, Belfast BT16 1QQ, United Kingdom

T: +44 (0)28 9048 4848               E: sales@sepha.com
F: +44 (0)28 9048 0890               W: www.sepha.com

More Related Content

What's hot

Food Packaging Testing Equipment
Food Packaging Testing EquipmentFood Packaging Testing Equipment
Food Packaging Testing EquipmentRohit Chawla
 
Kronenberg Summer 2015 Asatekin lab powerpoint
Kronenberg Summer 2015 Asatekin lab powerpointKronenberg Summer 2015 Asatekin lab powerpoint
Kronenberg Summer 2015 Asatekin lab powerpointJacob Kronenberg
 
Assignment no (1)
Assignment no (1)Assignment no (1)
Assignment no (1)rehan22ali
 
Tissue Processing in Histopathology
Tissue Processing  in HistopathologyTissue Processing  in Histopathology
Tissue Processing in HistopathologyDr.Kamal Uddin zaidi
 
Recent advances in desizing, scouring and bleaching
Recent advances in desizing, scouring and bleachingRecent advances in desizing, scouring and bleaching
Recent advances in desizing, scouring and bleachingBahirdar University
 
Wet Testing of textile materials
Wet Testing of textile materialsWet Testing of textile materials
Wet Testing of textile materialsAzmir Latif Beg
 

What's hot (12)

Mtad10
Mtad10Mtad10
Mtad10
 
Food Packaging Testing Equipment
Food Packaging Testing EquipmentFood Packaging Testing Equipment
Food Packaging Testing Equipment
 
Kronenberg Summer 2015 Asatekin lab powerpoint
Kronenberg Summer 2015 Asatekin lab powerpointKronenberg Summer 2015 Asatekin lab powerpoint
Kronenberg Summer 2015 Asatekin lab powerpoint
 
Assignment no (1)
Assignment no (1)Assignment no (1)
Assignment no (1)
 
Tissue Processing in Histopathology
Tissue Processing  in HistopathologyTissue Processing  in Histopathology
Tissue Processing in Histopathology
 
Recent advances in desizing, scouring and bleaching
Recent advances in desizing, scouring and bleachingRecent advances in desizing, scouring and bleaching
Recent advances in desizing, scouring and bleaching
 
TISSUE PROCESSING SEMINAR
TISSUE PROCESSING SEMINARTISSUE PROCESSING SEMINAR
TISSUE PROCESSING SEMINAR
 
Porosity
PorosityPorosity
Porosity
 
Wet Testing of textile materials
Wet Testing of textile materialsWet Testing of textile materials
Wet Testing of textile materials
 
Mounting media
Mounting mediaMounting media
Mounting media
 
Rajan final ppt
Rajan final pptRajan final ppt
Rajan final ppt
 
Science direct 1
Science direct 1Science direct 1
Science direct 1
 

Similar to Sepha Whitepaper Summary

quality control tests for parenterals
quality control tests for parenteralsquality control tests for parenterals
quality control tests for parenteralsAhmad Ali
 
Membrane characterization
Membrane characterizationMembrane characterization
Membrane characterizationPedroFigueira30
 
Optimization of Fibronectin Micro-contact Printing Protocol for Potential
Optimization of Fibronectin Micro-contact Printing Protocol for PotentialOptimization of Fibronectin Micro-contact Printing Protocol for Potential
Optimization of Fibronectin Micro-contact Printing Protocol for PotentialLaura McGimpsey
 
Turbidity poster presentation final edit
Turbidity poster presentation final editTurbidity poster presentation final edit
Turbidity poster presentation final editKala Drake
 
IPQC For Parenterals - By Kaleem Petkar
IPQC For Parenterals - By Kaleem PetkarIPQC For Parenterals - By Kaleem Petkar
IPQC For Parenterals - By Kaleem PetkarKaleem Petkar
 
EWMA 2013-Ep441-IN VITRO EVALUATION OF THE DEBRIDEMENT PERFORMANCE OF A NEW D...
EWMA 2013-Ep441-IN VITRO EVALUATION OF THE DEBRIDEMENT PERFORMANCE OF A NEW D...EWMA 2013-Ep441-IN VITRO EVALUATION OF THE DEBRIDEMENT PERFORMANCE OF A NEW D...
EWMA 2013-Ep441-IN VITRO EVALUATION OF THE DEBRIDEMENT PERFORMANCE OF A NEW D...EWMA
 
Physical Properties of Seven Different Brands of Standardized Endodontic Pape...
Physical Properties of Seven Different Brands of Standardized Endodontic Pape...Physical Properties of Seven Different Brands of Standardized Endodontic Pape...
Physical Properties of Seven Different Brands of Standardized Endodontic Pape...CrimsonPublishersTNN
 
Ipqc tests for sterile formulations
Ipqc tests for sterile formulationsIpqc tests for sterile formulations
Ipqc tests for sterile formulationsPramod Ramane
 
removal of the smear layer /rotary endodontic courses by indian dental academy
removal of the smear layer /rotary endodontic courses by indian dental academyremoval of the smear layer /rotary endodontic courses by indian dental academy
removal of the smear layer /rotary endodontic courses by indian dental academyIndian dental academy
 
Coating of nanocellulose on the filters
Coating of nanocellulose on the filtersCoating of nanocellulose on the filters
Coating of nanocellulose on the filtersKirubanandan Shanmugam
 

Similar to Sepha Whitepaper Summary (12)

quality control tests for parenterals
quality control tests for parenteralsquality control tests for parenterals
quality control tests for parenterals
 
Membrane characterization
Membrane characterizationMembrane characterization
Membrane characterization
 
Optimization of Fibronectin Micro-contact Printing Protocol for Potential
Optimization of Fibronectin Micro-contact Printing Protocol for PotentialOptimization of Fibronectin Micro-contact Printing Protocol for Potential
Optimization of Fibronectin Micro-contact Printing Protocol for Potential
 
Turbidity poster presentation final edit
Turbidity poster presentation final editTurbidity poster presentation final edit
Turbidity poster presentation final edit
 
IPQC For Parenterals - By Kaleem Petkar
IPQC For Parenterals - By Kaleem PetkarIPQC For Parenterals - By Kaleem Petkar
IPQC For Parenterals - By Kaleem Petkar
 
EWMA 2013-Ep441-IN VITRO EVALUATION OF THE DEBRIDEMENT PERFORMANCE OF A NEW D...
EWMA 2013-Ep441-IN VITRO EVALUATION OF THE DEBRIDEMENT PERFORMANCE OF A NEW D...EWMA 2013-Ep441-IN VITRO EVALUATION OF THE DEBRIDEMENT PERFORMANCE OF A NEW D...
EWMA 2013-Ep441-IN VITRO EVALUATION OF THE DEBRIDEMENT PERFORMANCE OF A NEW D...
 
Physical Properties of Seven Different Brands of Standardized Endodontic Pape...
Physical Properties of Seven Different Brands of Standardized Endodontic Pape...Physical Properties of Seven Different Brands of Standardized Endodontic Pape...
Physical Properties of Seven Different Brands of Standardized Endodontic Pape...
 
Ipqc tests for sterile formulations
Ipqc tests for sterile formulationsIpqc tests for sterile formulations
Ipqc tests for sterile formulations
 
BMES2015Poster
BMES2015PosterBMES2015Poster
BMES2015Poster
 
removal of the smear layer /rotary endodontic courses by indian dental academy
removal of the smear layer /rotary endodontic courses by indian dental academyremoval of the smear layer /rotary endodontic courses by indian dental academy
removal of the smear layer /rotary endodontic courses by indian dental academy
 
Coating of nanocellulose on the filters
Coating of nanocellulose on the filtersCoating of nanocellulose on the filters
Coating of nanocellulose on the filters
 
Poster_TJM_NK_1
Poster_TJM_NK_1Poster_TJM_NK_1
Poster_TJM_NK_1
 

Sepha Whitepaper Summary

  • 1. ASSESSING THE INTEGRITY OF PHARMACEUTICAL PACKAGING USING THE SEPHA BLISTERSCAN AND CONVENTIONAL BLUE DYE LEAK TESTING METHODS. WHITE PAPER OVERVIEW
  • 2. 01 ASSESSING THE INTEGRITY OF PHARMACEUTICAL PACKAGING USING THE SEPHA BLISTERSCAN AND CONVENTIONAL BLUE DYE LEAK TESTING METHODS. Dr Dorian Dixon, Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials Institute, University of Ulster. February 2011. Overview A preliminary study was free, 12µm holes or 20µm holes). conducted by Dr Dixon to The model defects were laser A new whitepaper by a leading determine the ability of drilled in the approximate centre packaging expert from the Blisterscan to identify defects of the foil laminate covering University of Ulster, Dr Dorian in a wide range of blister pack each pocket and the dimensions Dixon, into the integrity of designs. A Design of Experiment of the holes were confirmed to pharmaceutical packaging has approach was used to investigate a tolerance of +/-2µm using an established that existing methods the effect of pocket dimensions, electron microscope. for testing the seal integrity of foil thickness, pack material and blister packs are not as accurate defect size on detection rates as newer, technology based test by both Blisterscan equipment. and blue dye testing. This study found that In particular Dr Dixon found the Blisterscan test that the laser based Blisterscan, method detected manufactured in the UK by 100% of 15µm sized Sepha, was capable of detecting holes while only 85% 15% more product defects of such defects were than traditional blue dye test picked up by blue methods used by the majority of dye testing. the pharmaceutical market. In a global market valued at over In his whitepaper $40 billion per annum, where study Dr Dixon quality control is of paramount compared the ability importance, a 15% difference in of Blisterscan and the ability to detect if a product the blue dye test is sealed correctly or not is to detect defective significant. pockets in blister packs. 30 cavity Dr Dixon’s whitepaper “Assessing PVC thermoformed the Integrity of Pharmaceutical packs sealed with a packaging using Sepha 25µm foil laminate Blisterscan and Blue Dye Testing” were used, with comes on the back of internal 12µm or 20µm sized studies by Sepha highlighting holes laser drilled in that Blisterscan, a laser based the packs to create leak detection machine, was defective packs. 90 capable of identifying 50% pockets were tested more defects in blister packs with for each of the 10 micron holes than blue dye three sample types test methods. investigated (defect SEPHA WHITE PAPER
  • 3. 02 “DR DIXON STATES THAT THE APPROACH IS PREFERABLE TO SYSTEMS THAT RELY ON CONTACTING THE LID MATERIAL WITH A PROBE IN ORDER TO MEASURE PRESSURE OR DISPLACEMENT.” The current industry standard respond in a different manner for testing blister pack to a perfectly sealed pocket integrity is blue dye testing, when a vacuum is applied. Dr which consists of placing a Dixon states that the approach selection of packs into blue is preferable to systems that rely stained water, subjecting the on contacting the lid material packs to a vacuum of typically with a probe in order to measure 400-600mBar for several pressure or displacement. minutes and then removing the vacuum, which allows any Blisterscan testing consists of defective pockets to take up the initially scanning the surface of dye. The packs are manually each pocket in order to provide deblistered and inspected for a datum value for subsequent dye ingress. This technique deflection measurements. relies on human subjectivity, A vacuum level of 500mbar and Dr Dixon states that it is is then applied and held for unlikely that the accuracy he 10 seconds and the pack re- achieved in his laboratory tests measured. Deflection refers could be reproduced during to the difference in average routine factory quality control height when the vacuum is procedures. applied compared to the datum value. The vacuum level is then Blisterscan is a dry, non- reduced to 400mBar and held destructive technique which uses for a further 30 seconds before a laser to measure changes in the pack is scanned again. The the pack profile which result from variation in average height at applying a vacuum. The lidding the full and reduced vacuum is material of defective pockets will referred to as collapse. SEPHA WHITE PAPER
  • 4. 03 Figure 1a. Figure 1b. Blisterscan results of a pack containing a 30µm hole and a defect free pack Figure 1a illustrates the typical was recorded for the defect free after testing. The packs which difference in deflection behaviour packed compared to only 4µm were submerged in methylene measured by Blisterscan between for the pack containing the 30µm blue stained water and a vacuum a defect free pocket (bottom) hole. A large hole i.e. one greater of 500mBar was applied. This and one containing a 30µm sized than ~20µm allows the pressure vacuum level was maintained laser drilled defect (top). In Figure inside the pocket to equalise to for a soak time of 1 minute. The 1 the black dotted line is the the applied vacuum inhibiting foil vacuum was then released with profile of the foil surface before movement. Small holes manifest the packs remaining in the dye the vacuum is applied. It can be as a greater than normal for a further period of 1 minute seen that a variation in profile collapse when the vacuum level to allow the dye to penetrate any exists between packs. The profiles is reduced. This occurs as the air defective pockets. The pockets after the full and reduced vacuum slowly escapes through a small were then opened and the is applied are shown by the green defect allowing the pressure contents visually inspected for and purple lines respectively. inside the pocket to equalise with signs of dye ingress. the applied vacuum. The solid blue line denotes the Findings deflection, which is the difference Once the packs had been between the profiles before and tested by Blisterscan they were Building on Dr Dixon’s initial after the vacuum is applied, while then subjected to the blue dye study where 100% of 15 micron the red line illustrates collapse test. Extensive trials observed holes were detected, Blisterscan (difference between profiles that repeat testing packs on went on to detect 100% of the at full and reduced vacuum). BlisterScan had no observable 20 micron holes and 99% of It can be seen from Figure 1 effect on the deflection the 12 micron holes in the final that the pack with a 30µm hole behavior of the pack, or on whitepaper study. Conversely does not deflect significantly the dimensions of any defects. blue dye testing was only capable from the initial profile when the Multiple BlisterScan testing of detecting 85% of the 15 vacuum is applied. The defect of the same defective pocket micron holes, 90% of the 12 free pocket (Figure 1b) however produced repeatable results. The micron holes and 99% of the 20 displays a large deflection and non-destructive nature of the micron holes. adopts a domed profile as a BlisterScan technique was also result of the applied vacuum. In confirmed by electron microscopy this case a deflection of 410µm analysis of defects before and Figure 2: The destructive effect of blue dye on a tablet SEPHA WHITE PAPER
  • 5. 04 12µm Hole 15 µm Hole 20µm Hole Defect Free Blisterscan detection accuracy 99% 100% 100% 100% Blue Dye detection accuracy 90% 85% 99% 100% Table 1 : Blisterscan test accuracy vs Blue Dye test accuracy Commenting on the results of the whitepaper Dr Dixon said, “Blisterscan testing is a rapid “BUILDING ON non-destructive test method which can detect the presence DR DIXON’S INITIAL of 12um, 15um and 20um sized defects in pharmaceutical blister packaging with a higher degree STUDY WHERE 100% of reliability than conventional blue dye testing.” Dr Dixon went on to conclude that “The non- OF 15 MICRON HOLES subjective nature of Blisterscan testing removes the possibility of human error and reliance WERE DETECTED, on operator judgement, which is a key element in the correct BLISTERSCAN WENT identification of small holes using traditional blue dye testing.” ON TO DETECT 100% As manufacturers seek to improve their levels of quality control and drive costs down, OF THE 20 MICRON Blisterscan represents a significant improvement over traditional blue dye testing. HOLES AND 99% Sepha believe that the accurate and repeatable results proven OF THE 12 MICRON by this academic whitepaper, mean that Blisterscan is the definitive method for testing HOLES IN THE FINAL blister packs in the modern global pharmaceutical market. WHITEPAPER STUDY.” SEPHA WHITE PAPER
  • 6. Unit 25 Carrowreagh Business Park, Carrowreagh Road, Dundonald, Belfast BT16 1QQ, United Kingdom T: +44 (0)28 9048 4848 E: sales@sepha.com F: +44 (0)28 9048 0890 W: www.sepha.com