This document discusses cultural branding and how consumers relate to brands. It presents McCracken's Meaning Transfer Model to explain how brands communicate cultural myths that help resolve tensions in society. A successful cultural brand advances an ideology by connecting individuals with relevant subcultures or crowd-cultures in an authentic way. This model emphasizes how brands can be meaningful to consumers by relating to their identities and helping them navigate changes in culture.
5. Challenges
Consumer Culture Theory: a set of studies drawing on
sociology and anthropology challenged this view of
consumer-brand relationships, identifying:
• Consumers used brands to build their identity
• Consumers used brands to address challenges of I
vs. WE
• Consumers connect to brands in often profoundly
simple ways (relationship metaphors) to solve day-
to-day problems
• Strategic challenges of mindshare and emotions:
creep and ownership issues
9. Cultural Brand Connects I with WE
via Ideology
• Brand advances an ideology
– Patagonia’s adventurist environmentalism
– Dove’s body positive feminism
– Under Armour ‘Female uber-competitiveness’
• That resolves a profound cultural tension at a
particular moment in history, due to societal shift
• Via content repurposed from subcultural ‘source
materials’
– Dove – feminism vs. beauty myth
– Under Armour – female athletics
– Patagonia – ‘dirt bag’ subculture
12. Summary
• Different assumptions about consumer-brand
relationships lead to different models
• Identity markets such as fashion are cultural myth
markets where consumers are trying to cultivate
the self
• Cultural branding emphasizes relevance in
turbulent times, thus emphasizing change
• Ideologies or myths are built on links with
subcultures, populist worlds, or crowd-cultures,
but link must be authentic in every way