The Case Study Handbook ppt is the presentation I made for my BBA students at the university I taught for a brief period of time.
The PowerPoint content is fully based on the book "The Case Study Handbook - How to Read, Discuss, and Write Persuasively About Cases" 2007 by William Ellet.
If you're enrolled in an executive education or MBA program, you've probably encountered a powerful learning tool: the business case. But if you're like many people, you may find interpreting and writing about cases mystifying, challenging, or downright frustrating. In "The Case Study Handbook", William Ellet presents a potent new approach for analyzing, discussing, and writing about cases.
The book/course is designed for MBA students. Introduction to Author- worked with MBA students for 15 years. Teaches a second year course on “persuading business audiences” at Harvard, involve in preMBA program, and gives presentation to first year on analyzing and writing about cases. How the Book Came to Be – Conventional Writing – Coherant Paragraphs; Active Voice;Essays with decernible beginning, middle, and end.- Students confused, and unclear. Syllogistic approach Stephen Toulmin – Conclusion, reasons, and Evidence. Slowly this led to the book.
Written so that learners benefit on discussion & written arguments. All Cases in the book are from Harvard Business School and are anonymously played.
Individual or group presentation usually aim at persuading the audience. A case based essay also aims at persuasion. This book is divided into three separate skills: case analysis (I) discussion (II), and writing about cases (III)
It does not help student when they are not briefed about the case based method. Therefore, A sink or swim mentality seems common.
Cases have multiple meanings and thus are always controversial. In a classroom of forty students, there are likely to be forty different views of a case. To convince there classmates and professor writers must deal with two obstacles : shared text and critical outlook or attritude of the sudience. Because audience members are familiar with the case and will have their own opinion about it, Writers must meet a high standard of proof.
What? why?
You make conclusion about the case. But what can you say to prove it for audience to take your conclusion seriously. You need to show them why they should.
What? why? how?
You make conclusion about the case. But what can you say to prove it for audience to take your conclusion seriously. You need to show them why they should.
In lecture model there is truth, as teaching method is based on single interpretation but in case discussion they aren’t shaped into a single truth. For students this can be challenging and can be seen as a monumental shift in the educational experience since there are multiple meanings.
It’s vague/ lacks clarity. too much or too little information, and lots of contingency and so do the cases. They provide business students with equivalent of laboratories used for educating scientists and doctors.
You can assume that every case deals with something important eg: pricing dilemma, debt-equity trade offs, a major problem in a plant. A case must have an adequate fact to make possible reasonable conclusions, but it doesn’t state any conclusions.
A well written case must have these characteristics in order to simulate reality.
Cases may seem linear with introduction, conclusion but they are non linear meaning the content is not presented in the most logical way. Inexperienced students read cases assuming that the text has logical order. They are puzzled when the content organization isn’t completely illogical but is still confusing. Then they try to understand the case harder but rather than that they should spend time questioning whether the way they read matches the nature of the text or not.
A well written case must have these characteristics in order to simulate reality.
Case is subject to skepticism based on self interest and limited point of view. You can Give elephant and the blind man story. Every case whether it has large information or very little requires the reader to make inferences.
You can show a chart showing link between starting and ending connecting for news and stories, whereas not connecting for cases. Opening--- closing (any coherant example). Opening--- closing (case example) .
Receive it fits a text that states both subject and its significance. As a news story or an online product review does. Iphone 12 review.
Find it is adapted to a text that has keys or clues that the reader recognizes and puts together for a solution. Mystery novel is a good example. Make it is appropriate for cases.
If news reporter where reading a case they would send it back for rewrite.
By design case doesn’t tell you what it means. On first reading it can seem to be a whole that is less than the sum of its parts. Therefore, you can’t sit back and let the text do the work. You have to read a case actively and construct your own meaning.
The book/course is designed for MBA students. Introduction to Author- worked with MBA students for 15 years. Teaches a second year course on “persuading business audiences” at Harvard, involve in preMBA program, and gives presentation to first year on analyzing and writing about cases. How the Book Came to Be – Conventional Writing – Coherant Paragraphs; Active Voice;Essays with decernible beginning, middle, and end.- Students confused, and unclear. Syllogistic approach Stephen Toulmin – Conclusion, reasons, and Evidence. Slowly this led to the book.
Written so that learners benefit on discussion & written arguments. All Cases in the book are from Harvard Business School and are anonymously played.
(This book helps) the question should be how to provide a starting point for analysis that aids the use of theories and frameworks and quantitative formulas, all of which are indispensable for reaching conclusions about a case and building an argument for those conclusions.
Students new to the case method usually believe the most reliable way to understand a case is to read it from start to finish and then reread it as many times as necessary. (That’s why many business school student think speed reading courses can help them.) They rush into a case, highlighter in han, reading as if the case were textbook chapter. For case analysis you should know when to read fast and when to read slowly. You should spend more time thinking about a case than reading it.
There are multitude of situations but many case situation do belong in one of the four categories and when they do an awareness of which one can help organize analysis. It is not the only way but one way. The greatest value of the case situation approach may be that it causes you to think how you think about case studies. Many causes or few? Strive for a least number of causes sufficient to account for the principal effects. In terms of evaluation you can have good, bad, weak strong, as labels to generalize the performance or situation.
A word problem has many meanings. But in terms of case it is quite specific.
For example, department is doing well but sales are not increasing don’t know why.
That seems obvious, Yet Many cases don’t state a problem.
Protagonist view. Identifying decision option is quite easy because case tells you that. As soon as you encounter a stated decision you should look for statement of the alternatives. If they aren’t stated, then the first goal of analysis is to come up with plausible decision options. Decision criteria is the most important. Case does not state criteria so careful study of specific of the case, with the help of specialized methods is necessary. Criteria is used to develop evidence to complete a decision analysis. The goal is to determine the decision that creates the best fit between available evidence and the criteria.
If you don’t have concrete limit, you can drift along for hours, much of it taken up by distraction and undirected effort.
Hypothesesthat can’t be argued from evidence in the case is simply an unsubstantiated opinion. The one that can be backed up by evidence is galvanizing and can bring entirely new angle to the case.
After reading the opening and closing section you should put the case aside for a moment and consider what you have learned. Is the situation a problem, decision or evaluation, do you have any idea about the criteria that might fit situation. Does it seem you’ll have to cut through large information or make inferences, thereare there any hints in the cases for plausible decision, do the hints seem reliable or just a way to throw you off?
Use a pencil or pen to mark up th case. Mark facts, numbers that can be of importance.
Think about tangible actions and write then down. Finally give a bit of thought to order the actions. Alternativesintention isn’t to undermine your hardwork but to look critically at the hypothesis and evidence.
Think about tangible actions and write then down. Finally give a bit of thought to order the actions. Alternativesintention isn’t to undermine your hardwork but to look critically at the hypothesis and evidence.
The book/course is designed for MBA students. Introduction to Author- worked with MBA students for 15 years. Teaches a second year course on “persuading business audiences” at Harvard, involve in preMBA program, and gives presentation to first year on analyzing and writing about cases. How the Book Came to Be – Conventional Writing – Coherant Paragraphs; Active Voice;Essays with decernible beginning, middle, and end.- Students confused, and unclear. Syllogistic approach Stephen Toulmin – Conclusion, reasons, and Evidence. Slowly this led to the book.
Written so that learners benefit on discussion & written arguments. All Cases in the book are from Harvard Business School and are anonymously played.
In conventional classroom, experts share their knowledge with students, who take it in and, through examinations and other means, demonstrate they undertand it. Students participating in case discussion for the first time can view it as a disguised rendition of the old learning model, and make a number of wrong assumptions.
In conventional classroom, experts share their knowledge with students, who take it in and, through examinations and other means, demonstrate they undertand it. Students participating in case discussion for the first time can view it as a disguised rendition of the old learning model, and make a number of wrong assumptions.
Students who feel confident in their “right answers” will be eager to speak, and those who have less confidence want to avoid participation. Those who speak see themselves as being in a competition to prove to the professor that they have found the truth.
Students who feel confident in their “right answers” will be eager to speak, and those who have less confidence want to avoid participation. Those who speak see themselves as being in a competition to prove to the professor that they have found the truth. Students and instructor in a case discussion classroom are like a team. A soccer team made up of individuals, some wanting to showcase their individual skill and others wanting to stay as far away from the action as possible, cannot succeed and neither can a case discussion class. The coach can guide and support the team but can’t kick a goal or save one.
You stockpile points about a case before class. Points that you think will deliver high impact. Walk into the class with confidence. But once you make the point you are rejected. Some comment is good but sound like rehearsed comment. Instructor says nothing you get demotivated. Worst effect of canned comment is the one it has on you. Your engagement with the class is a constant attempt to fit their conversation to your thinking, and that removes you from class discussion. in the end, your own learning suffers.
In delay and assess students might be lucky to be motivated by friends or teacher to jump start but still don’t rely on others to solve the problem.
Think what is the worse that can happen if you speak? Making superficial comments, getting facts wrong, or misunderstanding what the professor or a classmate has said can certainly be embarrassing, but the moments inflict no permanent damage on active participants because everyone makes the same mistakes at one time or another. By the end of the class it is likely noone will remember the coment. In fact, silence is more damaging than comments that misfire. Silence is saying something.
You can do it the hard way, by spending large chunks of time on a case until disappointing results, fatigue, or both convince you to seek a better way. Alternative is to make decisions about an analytic approach at the beginning of case study and make necessary changes as you gain experiences with cases. One decision is the time limit. Two or more cases, two and half hour per case is good place, aim to gradually reduce that to two hour per case. For single case, you can afford three hours.
Start with an explicit process for analyzing a case. Chapter 3 model try it out.
Classroom for ase is intimidating place. Student differences in opinion, comepting for grades, ethical values, discomfort students. Bowling, card games, class dinners, sports, there are plenty of ways for classmates to get to know one another. Socializing helps students see each other for who they are rather than who they project to be.
Short term benefit is greater clarity about the issues that link one case to another and lends coherence to a course. Long term value is that these takeaway will become personal bible for leadership.
Don’t regard your early comment as a vehicle to prove your brilliance to peers and the professor. Stupid question is usually everyone question. Once you start talking, you will feel comfortable, and your mind will become clearer, and you will come up with better and better comments.
To convince a reader that a conclusion about a case is valid, the writer must offer credible evidence linked directly to the conclusion.
Contrary to what many MBA students think, most professors don’t want essays filled with lenghty case summaries and lists of insights and observations. They don’t want you to prove to them that you have read the case carefully by telliing them everything you know about it. They want you to answer whatever questions you have been asked about a case and to answer them efficicintly as you can.
To convince a reader that a conclusion about a case is valid, the writer must offer credible evidence linked directly to the conclusion.
Contrary to what many MBA students think, most professors don’t want essays filled with lenghty case summaries and lists of insights and observations. They don’t want you to prove to them that you have read the case carefully by telliing them everything you know about it. They want you to answer whatever questions you have been asked about a case and to answer them efficicintly as you can.
The most common failing of the case exams I have seen over the years is that the writers try to look at a situation from all angles, suggesting many meaning but committing to none. The statement of intention can be your reference point as you compose. Writing at start and writing at end both has its benefits and drawbacks.
The most common failing of the case exams I have seen over the years is that the writers try to look at a situation from all angles, suggesting many meaning but committing to none. The statement of intention can be your reference point as you compose. Writing at start and writing at end both has its benefits and drawbacks.
The most common failing of the case exams I have seen over the years is that the writers try to look at a situation from all angles, suggesting many meaning but committing to none. The statement of intention can be your reference point as you compose. Writing at start and writing at end both has its benefits and drawbacks.
The most common failing of the case exams I have seen over the years is that the writers try to look at a situation from all angles, suggesting many meaning but committing to none. The statement of intention can be your reference point as you compose. Writing at start and writing at end both has its benefits and drawbacks.
Don’t put action plan for arguments that has not been covered.
Don’t put action plan for arguments that has not been covered.
Don’t put action plan for arguments that has not been covered.
Short terms actions are easy to perform, something that protagonist can do quickly and easilty that will immediately improve the situation. Long term steps are complex and takes long period of time.
To evaluate the presidents action these criteria will be used The economic advantages and disadvantages of defaulting
The political advantages and disadvantages
The social advantages and disadvantages. For equalifictaion writer says the positive evaluation can be justified only if a long term development strategy is put in place.