002709_2012-2013_BUILD

IRN: 002709 Page 1 of 18Printed on August 25, 2014
2012-2013 Report Card for
Big Walnut High School
DISTRICT GRADE
2015
Coming in
SCHOOL GRADE
Achievement
Performance Index
...............................................................................................
........
Indicators Met
...............................................................................................
........
A
Coming in
2015
COMPONENT GRADE Progress
Value Added
Students with Disabilities.....................................................................................
Lowest 20% in Achievement..............................................................................
Coming in
2015
COMPONENT GRADE
This grade combines two results for students who
took the state tests. The first result answers the
question – How many students passed the state test?
The second result answers the question – How well
did students do on the state test?
This is your district’s average progress for its
students in math and reading, grades 4-8. It looks
at how much each student learns in a year. Did
the students get a year’s worth of growth? Did
they get more? Did they get less?
B
100.0%
89.9% Overall...................................................................................................................
Gifted...................................................................................................................
NR
NR
NR
NR
Gap Closing
Annual Measurable Objectives
...............................................................................................
........
89.9% B
Coming in
2015
COMPONENT GRADE Graduation Rate
Graduation Rates
of students graduated in 4 years...................................................................................96.3%
of students graduated in 5 years.................................................................................95.5%
Coming in
2015
COMPONENT GRADE
This grade shows how well all students are doing in
your district in reading, math, and graduation. It
answers the question – Is every student succeeding,
regardless of income, race, culture or disability?
This grade answers the question – How many
ninth graders graduate in four years or five years?
A
A
K-3 Literacy
Coming in
2015
COMPONENT GRADE Prepared for Success
Coming in
2015
COMPONENT GRADE
This grade answers the question – Are more students
learning to read in kindergarten through third grade?
The 2014 report card will report some results. The
2015 report card will display one grade for
kindergarten through grade 3.
This grade answers the question – Are students
who graduate from our district ready for college
or a career? There are six ways to show that
graduates are prepared. In the 2014 school year,
the report card will show results for the six areas.
The 2015 report card will display one grade
combining the results of all six ways of showing
graduates are prepared.

2012-2013 Report Card for Big Walnut High School
Achievement
This grade combines two results for students who took the state
tests. The first result answers the question – How many
students passed the state test? The second result answers the
question – How well did students do on the state test? Coming in
2015
COMPONENT GRADE
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0.0
1.1 1.3
0.5
4.3 4.7
3.3
25.1
29.5
19.9
38.8
34.9
38.1
34.8
31.4
46.0
104.0
101.8
107.9
2009 2010 2013
Untested Limited Basic Proficient Accelerated Advanced
=
=
=
0.01.3x
x
x
Advanced Plus
Advanced
Accelerated
Proficient
Basic
Limited
Untested
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.6
0.3
0.0
38.4
34.7
19.9
5.4
1.6
0.0
46.0
38.1
19.9
3.3
0.5
0.0
107.9
x
x
x
x
=
=
=
=
0.0
0
20
40 60
80
100
B
GRADE Performance Index
The Performance Index measures the test results of every student, not just those who
score proficient or higher. There are six levels on the index and districts receive points
for every student in each of these levels. The higher the achievement level the more
the points awarded in the district's index. This rewards schools and districts for
improving performance.
89.9%
Performance Index
107.9 of a possible 120.0
A = 90.0 - 100.0%
B = 80.0 - 89.9%
C = 70.0 - 79.9%
D = 50.0 - 69.9%
F = 0.0 - 49.9%
38.4
34.7
19.9
1.6
5.4
Advanced Plus
Advanced
Accelarated
Proficient
Limited
Basic
Untested
Achievement
Level
Pct of
Students
Points for
this Level
Points
Received
Performance Index Trend

A
GRADE Indicators Met
Indicators Met measures how many students have passed the state tests at a
minimum level, called proficient, or higher. Test results are reported for each
student in a grade and subject. At least 75 percent of students must pass to
get credit for the indicator. Starting in the 2013-14 school year, a district or
school needs to have 80 percent of their students pass at a minimum level or
higher in order to “meet” an indicator.
Indicators Met %
0
20
40 60
80
100
100.0%10.0 out of 10.0
A =
B =
C =
D =
F =
90.0 - 100.0%
80.0 - 89.9%
70.0 - 79.9%
50.0 - 69.9%
0.0 - 49.9%
6th Grade
7th Grade
8th Grade
Mathematics
Reading
Mathematics
Reading
Mathematics
Reading
Science
NC NC
NC NC
NC NC
NC NC
NC NC
NC NC
NC NC
OGT, 10th Graders
OGT, 11th Graders
Mathematics
Reading
Science
Social Studies
Writing
Mathematics
Reading
Science
Social Studies
Writing
93.8%
94.3%
89.4%
93.4%
94.7%
97.3%
97.3%
97.3%
98.2%
97.8%
3rd Grade
4th Grade
5th Grade
Mathematics
Reading
Mathematics
Reading
Mathematics
Reading
Science
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
This school does not have
enough test results in 3rd,
4th, or 5th grade to display
this table.
This school does not have
enough test results in 6th,
7th, or 8th grade to display
this table.
Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Ohio Graduation Test

Proficiency Percent Comparison by Grade Proficient Percent Trend by Grade
10th Grade OGT
76%
80%
84%
88%
92%
96% 94.3% 94.7% 93.8% 93.4%
89.4%
94.3% 94.7% 93.8% 93.4%
89.4%
87.6%
84.9%
83.9%
81.2%
77.3%
Reading Writing Mathematics Social Studies Science
School District State Average
82%
84%
86%
88%
90%
92%
94%
96%
98%
100%
2009 2010 2013
Reading Writing Mathematics Social Studies
Science
10th Grade OGT
11th Grade Cumulative OGT
84%
86%
88%
90%
92%
94%
96%
98%
100%
97.3% 97.8% 97.3%
98.2%
97.3%
97.3% 97.8% 97.3%
98.2%
97.3%
93.0%
92.1%
89.2%
88.2%
85.1%
Reading Writing Mathematics Social Studies Science
School District State Average
93%
94%
95%
96%
97%
98%
99%
100%
2009 2010 2013
Reading Writing Mathematics Social Studies
Science
11th Grade Cumulative OGT

Gifted Students
The Gifted Students data and Indicator highlight the opportunities for and performance of
gifted students. The dashboard answers several questions: How many students are
identified as gifted and in what categories? How many of those students are receiving
gifted services? How well are those gifted students performing? The Gifted Indicator
measures whether opportunity and performance expectations are being met for gifted
students.
INDICATOR
2015
Coming in
Students Identified as
Gifted
Students Receiving
Gifted Services
26.7% of enrollment
8.0% of enrollment 18.7%
8.0%
73.3%
Identified as Gifted, Not
Receiving Services
Receiving Gifted
Services
Not Identified as Gifted
Gifted Overview Achievement
This chart illustrates the test achievement levels by students identified as gifted in that
test's subject. For example, how well do students identified as gifted in Reading do on
the Reading achievement tests?
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
70.7%
89.9%
81.4%
86.8%
24.4%
8.3%
16.1%
10.7%
4.9% 1.8% 2.5% 2.5%
Reading Math Science Social Studies
Advanced Accelerated Proficient
Value Added
Value Added measures the progress for all
students identified as gifted in reading, math,
and/or superior cognitive ability.
GRADE
NR
Performance Index
This chart compares the Performance Index of students identified as gifted to those not
identified as gifted.
115.6
106.1
Gifted
Non-Gifted

Enrollment by Gifted Category
Grades K-3
No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data.
Grades 4-8
Grades 9-12
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
0.2%
3.0%
3.2% 3.1%
3.7%
3.1%
0.2%
0.9% 0.8%
0.2%
2.2%
Creative Thinking
Math
Reading
Science
Social Studies
Superior Cognitive
Visual and Performing Arts
Identified Receiving Services
This chart cannot be displayed because there
were not enough students to evaluate.
All Grades
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
0.2%
3.0%
3.2% 3.1%
3.7%
3.1%
0.2%
0.9% 0.8%
0.2%
2.2%
Creative Thinking
Math
Reading
Science
Social Studies
Superior Cognitive
Visual and Performing Arts
Identified Receiving Services
These charts show the percentage of enrolled students that are identified as gifted and that are receiving gifted services.

Identified and Receiving Services
Grades K-3
Grades 4-8
Grades 9-12
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
0.0%
30.2%
24.3%
7.2%
0.0%
72.4%
0.0%
Creative Thinking Math Reading Science
Social Studies Superior Cognitive Visual and Performing
Arts
This chart cannot be displayed because
there were not enough students to
evaluate.
All Grades
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
0.0%
30.2%
24.3%
7.2%
0.0%
72.4%
0.0%
Creative Thinking Math Reading Science
Social Studies Superior Cognitive Visual and Performing
Arts
These charts show, of the students identified as gifted, the percentage of students receiving gifted services.

Progress
This is your school’s average progress for its students in math and
reading, grades 4-8. It looks at how much each student learns in a
year. It answers the question – Did the students get a year’s worth of
growth? Did they get more? Did they get less?
Coming in
2015
COMPONENT GRADE
NR
GRADE Overall
Coming
in 2016
GRADE High School
NR
GRADE Gifted Students
NR
GRADE Students with Disabilities
NR
GRADE Students in the Lowest 20% in Achievement
This measures the progress for all students in math and reading,
grades 4-8.
A High School measure of progress will be implemented in the 2015-16
school year.
This measures the progress for students identified as gifted in reading,
math, and/or superior cognitive ability.
This measures the progress for students with disabilities.
This measures the progress for students identified as the lowest 20%
statewide in reading and math achievement.
No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter
excludes all data.
This table shows the Progress scores by test grade and subject.
Although Progress scores are not
assigned letter grades at this level of
detail, the grading scale applied at the
Overall (All Students, All Tests) level is:
A = 2.0 and up
B = 1.0 to 1.9
C = -1.0 to 0.9
D = -2.0 to -1.1
F = below -2.0
Progress Details

Progress vs. Performance Index
This bubble chart shows the relationship between each subgroup's performance index results (horizontal
axis) to the Value-Added letter grade (vertical axis). The size of the bubble represents the size of the
student subgroup.
A
B
C
D
F Performance Index
Grade

Gap Closing
This grade shows how well all students are doing in your district in
reading, math, and graduation. It answers the question – Is every
student succeeding, regardless of income, race, culture or disability? Coming in
2015
COMPONENT GRADE
Graduation RateMathReading
B
GRADE Annual Measurable Objectives
Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) compare the performance of all students to a state goal which is displayed as the red line in the following charts. These charts show how well each group achieves
that goal in reading, math and graduation – and emphasize any achievement gaps that exist between groups. The ultimate goal is for all groups to achieve at high levels.
The red line on each graph identifies the Annual Measurable Objective. The 2013 AMO for Reading is 83.4%, for Math is 78.5%, and for Graduation Rate is 75.9%.
0 20 40 60 80 100
95.2
93.9
83.9
White All Students
Econ
Disadvantage
AMO Points
89.9%
0
20
40 60
80
100
90
A = 90.0 - 100.0%
B = 80.0 - 89.9%
C = 70.0 - 79.9%
D = 60.0 - 69.9%
F = 0.0 - 59.9%
0 20 40 60 80 100
93.9
93.7
90.3
All Students White
Econ Disadvantage
0 20 40 60 80 100
96.9
96.3
87.9
84.8
White All Students
Students w/ Disa... Econ Disadvantage
Subgroups with fewer than 30 students are not rated and do not appear on the graphs.

Graduation Rate
This grade represents the percentage of students whom entered the
9th grade and graduated 4 and 5 years later.
Coming in
2015
COMPONENT GRADE
D =
B =
0
20
40
60
80
100
96.3 96.3
81.3
School District
State Average
4-Year Rate
0
20
40
60
80
100
95.5 95.5
82.4
School District
State Average
5-Year Rate
A
GRADE
4-Year Graduation Rate
The 4-year graduation rate applies to the Class of 2012 who graduated within four years, i.e. students who
entered the 9th grade in 2009 and graduated by 2012.
A
GRADE
5-Year Graduation Rate
The 5-year graduation rate applies to the Class of 2011 who graduated within five years, i.e. students who
entered the 9th grade in 2008 and graduated by 2012.
96.3%
95.5%
A = 93.0 - 100.0%
89.0 - 92.9%
C = 84.0 - 88.9%
79.0 - 83.9%
F = 0.0 - 78.9%
A = 95.0 - 100.0%
B = 90.0 - 94.9%
C = 85.0 - 89.9%
D = 80.0 - 84.9%
F = 0.0 - 79.9%
0
20
40 60
80
100
0
20
40 60
80
100

Graduation Rate Trend
93%
93%
94%
94%
95%
95%
96%
96%
97%
97%
98%
96.0%
92.9%
96.3%
93.3%
96.5%
95.5%
97.1%
2010 2011 2012 2013
4 - Year 5 - Year
Note: The 5-year graduation rate does not appear in the final year of this graph because the
necessary data is not yet available to calculate the 5-year rate for that school year.

Principal:
Address:
Jeffrey W. Jones
PO Box 5001
Sunbury OH 43074-5001
Directory information current as of the 2012-2013 Report Card publication date
Phone: (740) 965-3766
Your School's Students
Average
Daily
Enrollment:
897
Enrollment by Subgroup
Am. Indian / Alaskan Native
Asian or Pacific Islander
Black, Non-Hispanic
Hispanic
Multiracial
White, Non-Hispanic
Students with Disabilities
Economically Disadvantaged
Limited English Proficiency
Migrant
Enrollment # Enrollment %
NC
NC
1.4%13
1.8%16
3.7%33
92.0%826
10.3%93
15.6%140
NC
NC
NC = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 10 in the group
Number of
Limited
English
Proficiency
Students
Excluded from
Accountability
Calculations:
--
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
American Indian or
Alaska...
Asian or Pacific Islander Black, Non-Hispanic
Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic
Students with
Disabilities
Economic Disadvantage
Limited English
Proficiency
Migrant

All Students
Am. Indian / Alaskan Native
Black, Non-Hispanic
Hispanic
Multiracial
White, Non-Hispanic
Students with Disabilities
Economically Disadvantaged
Limited English Proficiency
Migrant
Student Mobility %
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
NC
NC
Mobility Rates by Subgroup
-600%
-400%
-200%
0%
200%
400%
600%
All Students
American Indian or
Alaska...
Black, Non-Hispanic Economic Disadvantage Hispanic
Limited English
Proficiency
Migrant Multiracial
Students with
Disabilities
White, Non-Hispanic
A mobility rate chart cannot be
displayed for this school because
either there are not enough
students to evaluate in any
subgroup or all calculated results
are 0.0%.

Your School's Teachers
Percentage of teachers with at least a Bachelor's Degree
Percentage of teachers with at least a Master's Degree
Percentage of core academic subject and elementary
classes not taught by Highly Qualified Teachers
Percentage of core academic subject and elementary
classes taught by properly certified teachers
Percentage of core academic subject elementary and
secondary classes taught by teachers with temporary,
conditional or long-term substitute certification/licensure
Your School Your District
64.9
99.6
99.4
59.7
0
99.9
0
High-poverty schools are those ranked in the top quartile based on the percentage of economically disadvantaged students. Low-poverty schools are those ranked in the bottom quartile based
on the percentage of economically disadvantaged students. A district may have buildings in both quartiles, in just one quartile or in neither quartile.
Your School's Poverty Status: Low
100.0
0
0
Wellness and Physical Education
The extent to which students are successful in
meeting the benchmarks contained in Ohio's
physical education standards
Moderate Success

Financial Data
These measures answer several questions about spending and performance. How much is spent on Classroom instruction? How
much, on average, is spent on each student? What is the source of the revenue? How do these measures compare to other districts
and schools?
Comparison Group: Enrollment between 2500 and 4999
Note: Financial data is district level data. The data on this page is for Big Walnut Local, not just Big Walnut High
School.
Classroom Spending Data
68.4%
31.6%
Percentage Spent on
Classroom Instruction
66.1%
Rank in comparison group
for highest % spent
92 out of 112
Percentage Spent for Non-
33.9%
Rank in comparison group
for highest % spent
21 out of 112
Comparison Group State
66.1%
33.9%
67.5%
32.5%
District
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Classroom Instruction Non-Classroom Instruction
$0 $4,000 $8,000 $12,000
$5,668
$5,953
$2,901
$2,861
School
State
Operating Spending per Pupil
District State
$8,569 $8,814
$5,668 $5,953
$2,901 $2,861
Non-Classroom Spending
Spending per Pupil Data

Spending and Performance
This measure answers the question – what is the relationship of average spending per student to performance, and how does that compare to similar districts and
schools?
Comparison Group
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
110.0
120.0
$0 $3,000 $6,000 $9,000 $12,000 $15,000 $18,000 $21,000 $24,000
PerformanceIndex
Spending per Pupil
Big Walnut Local IS among the 20% of traditional public districts with the
highest academic performance index scores.
Big Walnut Local IS NOT among the 20% of traditional public districts
with the lowest operating expenditures per pupil.
All Public Districts
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
110.0
120.0
$0 $3,000 $6,000 $9,000 $12,000 $15,000 $18,000 $21,000 $24,000
PerformanceIndex
Spending per Pupil

Source of Revenue
68.4%
21.2%
4.6%
Local State
Federal Other Non-Tax
District
40.1%
8.6%
44.0%
7.3%
Local Federal
State Other Non-Tax
State
Source of Funds
Local
State
Federal
District
68.4%
21.2%
4.6%
State Total
40.1%
44.0%
8.6%
Other Non-Tax
Total
0.0%
100.0%
7.3%
100.0%
$21,300,771
$6,611,486
$1,425,747
$0
$29,338,004
$7,953,216,862
$8,725,275,316
$1,701,436,355
$1,442,122,710
$19,822,051,242

002709_2012-2013_BUILD

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to 002709_2012-2013_BUILD

Similar to 002709_2012-2013_BUILD (20)

002709_2012-2013_BUILD