Examples Of Negligence In Healthcare
I think first and foremost it would be important to explain to the healthcare professionals what tort is and how it can happen so that the healthcare
professions can have a better idea of what exactly tort is and how to avoid it happening ever again. Tort is defined as a civil wrong; it is something
that unfairly causes someone else to suffer a loss of harm resulting in legal liability. Torts are categorized in several different ways; the most common
ways are negligent and intentional torts.
Negligence is defined as a cause of action that can lead to damages, or to relief, it is designed to protect legal rights. Through civil cases an injured
person must prove that another person acted negligently to cause their injury. It must be proven that it was a "careless" mistake. The elements that must
be established in every negligence case are, duty, breach,...show more content...
Intentional tort occurs when the medical professional intends to hurt an individual but ends up hurting another person in the process. Examples of both
of these can vary; negligence can happen when any careless act occurs. Some examples include misdiagnosis, delayed diagnosis, surgical error,
unnecessary surgery, malpractice, etc. This is very important to never allow this to happen so that tort laws are not broken and the medical
professionals are able to uphold their ethical standards that they must meet.
Misdiagnosis can happen for example, when a patient is not notified about their cancer diagnosis and ends up having a mistake in their diagnosis, the
doctor may then be held liable for any further injuries or damage.
Delayed diagnosis can happen when for example, a patient that has cancer is not notified immediately about their illness and with the delay in the
diagnosis, and treatment is must more difficult and can then reduce the likelihood of the recovery for their
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Medical Negligence
Could parents who use IVF or other ARTs be more likely to make medical negligence claims following childbirth?
Birth injury claims are some of the most serious cases that medical negligence solicitors see. Infants, who are usually the victims in these cases, may
be unlikely to ever recover from their injuries and could, require care and assistance for the rest of their lives.
So what leads to these personal Injury claims? Recent research from Plymouth University has indicated that women who conceive naturally could be
less likely to face problems in childbirth than those who utilise assisted reproductive technology (ART) to conceive, as a result of the so–called
'precious baby' effect.
The study, which polled clinicians from all over the world,...show more content...
While the scientists admitted the research is not conclusive and is only indirect, it appears to show that the management of ART pregnancies and
natural pregnancies can be different, and that clinicians can also fall into 'previous baby' syndrome.
Presumably clinicians miss out on these tests because they do not wish to recommend a termination to someone who has tried so hard to become
pregnant and has had so much difficulty. However, when these tests are advisable but are not performed, and a child is born with a serious birth
defect as a result, the parents may be able to make a medical negligence claim against the practitioner who failed to properly check the health of the
baby before it was born.
Clinicians should take all steps to ensure they do not fall prey to precious baby syndrome and treat every patient in a consistent and responsible manner.
Carol Smith has spent years looking into hospital negligence compensation, personal injury solicitor's cases and other forms of mistreatment and poor
service in the healthcare setting for a team of solicitors in

Medical Negligence Research Paper
One thing that sets medical malpractice apart from other legal issues is the challenge of understanding if you are, in fact, a victim. You may have
gone in for a simple medical procedure six months ago and yet now you find yourself in a hospital bed. Or you may have had a loved one pass
away after/during treatment at a hospital. Dealing with the issues of this new reality can be overwhelming on their own without adding the
possibility that there was medical malpractice involved. One of the most frustrating things about being a victim of medical malpractice or medical
negligence is that, as you deal with the many issues surrounding your injury, the time you have to take action is steadily ticking away. You may
wonder if you should focus on your recovery or on managing the issues around your loved one's death before you look into filing a malpractice
lawsuit. That can make it very difficult for you to be made whole or find justice....show more content...
There is a time limit, by law, on how long you have to file a medical malpractice lawsuit. This time limit is called the "statute of limitations." If the
statute of limitations expires before you file a lawsuit, you lose the chance to be compensated for your loss and to seek justice, even if it is clear you
were a victim. The statute of limitations is not meant to make things particularly unfair for victims of medical malpractice. The reason we have a
statute of limitations is to find a balance for protecting injured parties while allowing medical providers a chance to defend themselves while records
and witnesses are still available. There are a few triggers that start the clock on the statute of limitations running, those

A big problem that is becoming of lawsuits is Wrongful Birth Cases. Wrongful birth by legal definition is a term to describe medical malpractice. A
claim that the child would not have been born if medical malpractice did not occur (Knudsen, 2011). The legal definition of medical malpractice is
also known as medical negligence, this is a professional negligence by act or omission by a health care provider which the treatment provided falls
below the accepted standards of practice in the medical community and causes injury or death to the patient (Dictionary.com). In most cases, this is
medical error. There is now 28 states that recognized wrongful birth claims. There is also 12 states that prohibit wrongful birth claims, including, Idaho,
...show more content...
A major reason parents sue the care providers is because of the financial problems it takes in raising a child with down syndrome or another disability.
The parents want to seek damages for their child with a birth defect. The parents also sue for the emotional distress they they suffered, as well as
the cost for the child. The parents seek award for the cost of the child for the rest of their life. The plaintiff wants to show that the defendant was
negligent in the diagnose of the rubella in her 1st month of pregnancy. The rubella is a contagious viral disease with symptoms like mild measles.
This viral disease can cause fetal malformation to the baby if contracted in early pregnancy (Dictionary.com). While wrongful birth does not just
represent children with down syndrome it represents all kinds of birth problems children are born with. A couple won a $4.5 million in a lawsuit for
wrongful birth. The parents claimed "They would have never brought their son Bryan into the world if they had known about his horrific disabilities"
(Hallowell, 2011). The parents son was born with only three limbs, no arms and one leg; however, if Dr. Marie Morel and technicians at OB/GYN
specialists of the Palm Beaches did properly administered two ultrasounds and seen he was missing three limbs the parents would have terminated the
pregnancy (Howell, 2011). The parents "understandably upset that they had no warning about the

Pros And Cons Of Medical Negligence
Medical Negligence is one of a civil action that take against medical professionals by the injured party. In brief, medical negligence is a medical
malpractice that by act carried out or omission by a medical practitioner or health care provider in which the treatment provided is below reasonable or
required standard of care or practice in the boundary of medical professional and caused harm or injury to the victim. As a doctor or medical
professional whom specialize in a medical skills and knowledge are bound to exercise their duty in a professional way. Therefore, they are bounded
to carry out higher level or standard of duty of care towards their patients. Failure to do so might be charge under medical negligence.
In such, the test to determine the standard of care of a medical professional can be found in the case of Bolam v Friern Hospital Management
Committee. The brief fact of the case is that the...show more content...
As mentioned in the case of Bolam above, the standard of duty of care for doctor is higher than an ordinary reasonable person. In order to prove a
medical breach of duty by doctor, it heavily depend on expert evidence provided by other professional that in if other doctors were in the same
situation, what are their reasonable practice of care towards their patient. If majority show a different practice or would not practice such alike with
the defendant then the defendant might in breach of his duty of care. However, some might try to escape their liability by argue that they have less
experience in that field. In the case of Nettleship v Weston, it established that a lack of experience cannot be an excuse for breach of duty of care. A
doctor who has less experience such as junior doctor or new doctor should take extended reasonable steps to consult and seek assistance from senior
doctor who has more experience and they are expect to treat patient that they are capable of

Medical Malpractice And Negligence Cases
Introduction Paragraph.. {Deb–– So, I usually write this last and am still not quite sure how to start my paper. Any feedback or suggestions are
welcome} According to Showalter (2015), medical malpractice is a form of negligence and negligence is a sub–category of torts that fall under civil
law (p. 104). Some cases brought against healthcare providers fall under the category of intentional torts or breach of contract. However, this paper
will focus on negligence cases and how elements of a contract establish a duty of care. Brodnick, Rinehart–Thompson & Reynolds (2017) state,
"Medical malpractice and negligence are often used interchangeably because negligence is the basis for most (but not all) medical malpractice
lawsuits". As further

WHY YOU SHOULD OPEN A CASE OF MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE Do you believe that you are a victim of medical negligence? Medical
negligence includes injury, damage, loss or suffering caused by deliberate or irresponsible actions of a medical practitioner during a medical treatment.
This covers any instances where the standard of medical care from your doctors, nurses or other medical staff is deficient or lacking. A subpar standard
of care could constitute medical negligence in many forms. It can be misdiagnoses, a botched operation, harmful medical treatment or secondary
ailments acquired from reduced safety precautions during a medical treatment. Medical negligence can occur in private medical practices, free
healthcare clinics and national hospitals

Medical Negligence And Medical Negligence
MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE RHEA DALAL BBA LLB ROLL NO
– 16
"If people understood that doctors weren't divine, perhaps the odor of malpractice might diminish."
In India doctors are treated as second life saver after God. The standard of care should be more so that the cases of negligence may not arise.
Nowadays Indian society is experiencing a growing awareness regarding the patients right as the number of case of medical negligence has increased
drastically.
A doctor can be charged with criminal negligence when a patient...show more content...
The protection of patients right should not be at the cost of professional integrity. When an FIR is filed against a doctor for the death of a patient under
treatment than the doctor can be arrested and can be punished for 2 years of imprisonment under IPC section 304A.
But if the doctor has not charged any fees for the treatment of the patient than, the doctor cannot be sued for medical negligence. The patient requires
proper care as they suffer from disease and treatment is been provided, it becomes the duty of the hospital as well as that of the staff members to take
care of the patient.
In the case of:
Aparna Dutt V. Appollo Hospital Enterprises Ltd
It was held in this case that the staff members of the hospital had not taken proper care of the patient and so the court held liable the hospital thus it
is the duty of the staff members also to take care. The doctor is not held liable for every injury caused to the patient, the injury cured only under his
treatment can only be held liable if proper care is not taken by the doctor. It should show all possible reasons for the injury caused than only the
compensation can be

This is a classic example of failure to protect a patient from potential harm. The question of whether a slip and fall that occurs within a hospital
constitutes medical malpractice, rather than ordinary negligence, has been a much debated topic. Medical malpractice refers to professional negligence
by the hospital or its staff whose actions have caused emotional, physical and monetary damage to a patient under care. Negligence is a failure to act as
a reasonably prudent person would act under similar circumstances.
There are four elements of negligence that must be established in order for there to be a practical medical malpractice claim. In this specific case, it
can be analyzed all these four elements of negligence settled in order to have

Title: Process of medical negligence claims and solicitors fees options
To create prosperous Professional medical negligence claims, you can find 2 biggest aspects ought to prove. To start with, you must show in which
problem from professional medical website, i. Electronic. Treatment is exhibiting ended up being poor along with executed under many appropriate
prices and that has not been helped simply by physique. Second of all you have got to demonstrate causation means carelessness treatment right added
to the damage.
Previous to getting in contact with in order to solicitor, you must go through NHS issues treatment, can often be helpful for solicitor to acquire more
info concerning your current treatment and definitely will aid your current solicitor whenever they assess the event. Previous to creating states
professional medical negligence you...show more content...
Your income will be considered and the solicitor will have to show this Authorized Services Commission that provides Authorized aid that this event
provides realistic prospective customers connected with thriving. To offer justified reason internet marketing granted Authorized help your current
solicitor must also be able to show that this state complies with the purchase price help checks, i. Electronic. That this loss recovered is often more than
the fees connected with seeking this motion.
In last option you can apply a common condition payment deal, this is referred to as not any gain not any payment time frame, in such cases should
you gain this state, your current solicitor recuperate expense from your accused. And if an individual loss subsequently you will not always be
responsible for any of the

Medical Negligence Claim
Findings from a 2012 Study of Medical Negligence Claiming in Scotland revealed that patient support and advice groups find that when a complaint is
made to the NHS in relation to a medical injury a defensive attitude tends to be adopted in response to such complaints. According to Professor Sir Ian
Kennedy, Chairman of the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority, this defensive attitude is what leads to claims being raised against the
NHS. He stated that the current clinical negligence regime is what prompts defensiveness within the NHS and that this problem will persist as long as
the fear of litigation and stigma of settlement remains. In the literature reviewed there seems to be a general consensus that the requirement for the
claimant

Medical Malpractice
Medical Malpractice
The doctor–patient relationship has been defined differently through the years. In the beginning it developed into a "common calling" which meant
doctors practiced medicine as a duty to their patients. Laws were developed to protect patients, therefore doctors used proper care and expert skill. In
the past six centuries, medical malpractice has increased, which lead to revision and addition to the law. Liability was introduced along with the
"GIANT of all torts", negligence. Now in today's society, a doctor's duty is to use reasonable care, skill and judgment in the practice of his/her
profession and when negligent, take full responsibility. What is malpractice? Malpractice is negligence. Negligence...show more content...
In cases like these the doctor is incredibly egotistical and is playing God.
Physicians
who ignore patient requests or fail to ask for consent only build communication barriers and ruin the profession's reputation. Many people believe
doctors are the real victims. They feel doctors are confined from performing and medical students limit career options in fear of being sued. There
are some illegitimate and ungrateful citizens who insist on filing suits when doctors are not at fault. When a family member dies, the loss may cause
anger and looking for a doctor to sue seems like the right thing to do. It is human nature to always look for a party at fault in any tragedy. Doctors'
fears of malpractice awards also result in bad medical care. New procedures carry a higher risk of harm and second guessing later, so doctors stick to
conventional treatments, even in terminal cases, for fear the treatment may hasten the patient's death. The opposite is also true, both overtesting and
overtreating are standard methods of beating malpractice suits. Thousands of unneeded surgeries are performed each year. Expensive technology is
regularly misused В– CAT scans to diagnose simple headaches, for example. Also, the few plaintiff's who win unrealistically high awards raise
insurance costs for all doctors. (Nolo Press editors, # 32) In fact, the Canadian Medical Protective
Association has announced a 20 % increase in premiums for

Medical Negligence Case
If you are ever in doubt about hiring an attorney for your personal injury case, then there are some aspects that you should keep in mind. One of
the main questions you should ask yourself is whether your case is simple or complex. The severity of your injuries will also decide whether you
require Personal Injury Lawyer Vaughan. You should always keep in mind that the personal injury encompasses wide array of personal injuries.
Your case would be considered under personal injury law only if you have sustained your injuries due to the negligence, omission or commission of
some one. The case you will file would be a civil case and not a criminal case. The defendant would not be prosecuted and you will only receive only
monetary compensation....show more content...
These injuries have resulted in adversely affecting your physical appearance or capabilities over a long period of time or even permanently. While
deciding the compensation amount, you are entitled to; this factor is always taken into consideration by the court. Medical malpractice Amongst all
the personal injury cases, proving medical negligence is one of the toughest. For these types of cases, you will always require the help of an
experienced, knowledgeable and skilled Personal Injury Lawyer Vaughan to fight your case. You can file a case if you feel that you have suffered
injuries due to the incompetence, unprofessionalism or carelessness during diagnosis or treatment of your medical condition. Depending upon the
provider, you can file your case against the nurse, hospital, doctor, laboratory, clinic or any other related medical provider. Toxic exposure As is the
case with the medical malpractice, the cases involving toxic exposure require great skill and investigative acumen of the Personal Injury Lawyer
Vaughan. You will have to gather irrefutable complex scientific data to back your claim that your injuries are due to your exposure to the said
contaminants in the soil, water, air or any other

Medical Negligence Case Study
Legal Issues: Due to several medical errors from both the Hospital and Nursing facility legal can step in and make a case for Medical Negligence.
This case may not have been intentional but too many mistakes bypassed people on several occasions and by two different organizations caused the
patient to have an extension of a stroke. Doctors and medical staff have an obligation and duty to their patients to be in line with the "Medical
Standard of Care." This legal term is defined as, "the caution that a reasonable person in similar circumstances would exercise in providing care to a
patient." Here the physician did not provide the quality of care to the patient because he/she did not adequately review the patient history and
medications properly.

Ethical Issues In Medical Malpractice Cases
Medical malpractice refers to negligence by a health care provider whose treatment was unacceptable, caused harm, injury or death to a patient.
This can be from a nurse, a doctor or any other health professional. Majority of the cases are from a medical error like a wrong diagnosis,
medication dosage, treatment or aftercare and even a major mistake during surgery. Not all errors are because of a doctor error. Complications arise
that even doctors did not expect. Compensation for malpractice lawsuits are referred to as damages(money) and are awarded to the patient or patients
family if death was involved. The lawsuit can be against a hospital, doctor or insurance company. Not all doctors have the same style of treating
patients. If a doctor...show more content...
A patient can refuse treatment even if their doctor believes their decision is wrong. Doctors or any other health care professional cannot provide
any kind of treatment without a consenting adult, if the patient is a minor one of their legal guardians has to be there to make the decision.
Doctors are obligated to provide the patient with all details about their treatment, this means all risks, and possible outcomes. If a doctor describes
the details of the patient's operation but does not tell them the surgery is high risk for heart failure, blood clots or death the doctor could be held
liable for a malpractice suit. Doctors also have to tell a patient what they would do if one of the risks occurred and the patient was unable to make
any medical decisions. If a doctor does this, then they have covered themselves and usually cannot be sued. With this information patient are able to
make a choice about treatment knowing all possible outcomes. During an investigation a lawyer gathers all information that refers to loss of any
income, wages, medical expenses, or childcare services. These need to be properly documented from receipts or bills, then they can be calculated to
determine any damages owed. Lawyers, adjusters, juries and accountants have access to all this information so they can look thru and add up damages.
Non–economic damages can include compensation for suffering, pain and any humiliation can also be decided in a

Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Essay
Introduction:Medical malpractice lawsuits are an extremely serious topic and have affected numerous patients, doctors, and hospitals across the
country. Medical malpractice is defined as "improper, unskilled or negligent treatment of a patient by a physician, dentist, nurse, pharmacist, or other
health care professional" (Medical malpractice, n.d.). If a doctor acts negligent and causes harm to a patient, malpractice lawsuits arise. Negligence is
the concept of the liability concerning claims of medical malpractice, making this type of litigation part of tort law. Tort law provides that one person
may litigate negligence to recover damages for personal injury. Negligence laws are designed to deter careless behavior and also to...show more
content...
Basic Requirements for a Claim: In order to claim that a doctor or hospital was negligent in a medical malpractice case, there must be specific
requirements present. First off a doctor–patient relationship must have existed (Boeschen, 2014). An individual making the claim must show that there
was a physician–patient relationship with the doctor being sued. This means the doctor was hired and agreed to be hired for the medical care
provided. If a doctor began seeing you and treating you, it is easy to prove a physician–patient relationship existed. Second the plaintiff must show the
doctor was negligent. Regardless of if the patient is unhappy with their treatment or results, does not determine the doctor is liable for medical
malpractice. The doctor must have been negligent –– not reasonably skillful and careful –– in a diagnosis or treatment (Boeschen, 2014). To sue for
malpractice, you must be able to show that the doctor caused you harm in a way that a competent doctor, under the same circumstances would not
have (Boeschen, 2014). In many cases, the doctor's care is not required to be the best possible, but simply "reasonably skillful and careful" (Boeschen,
2014). Whether or not the doctor was reasonably skillful and careful is often up to the medical malpractice claim. Another basic requirement of a
medical malpractice claim is whether or not the doctor's negligence caused the injury. Many malpractice cases involve patients that were already

The Pros And Cons Of Medical Negligence
INTRODUCTION
In the present scenario, medical negligence has been topic of great scrutiny . The number cases filed for negligence are increasing. This is not only
harmful for the person affected, but also a matter to be given a great thought of. Doctors through their code of conduct are highly responsible to take
care of the patient and such negligent care on their part does not only results in money loss to the party but also serious complications in many cases ,
and it may many a times result into death of the party.
So medical negligence is not something that can be reprimanded and serious actions needs to be taken against it. As it denigrates the image of doctor
in the right thinking people, doctors are seemed to be as sanctified figure....show more content...
Elements of medical negligence
Plaintiff has to prove all five elements for successful medical negligence claim :–
1.A duty owned by the doctor :– A legal duty exist whenever a or doctor start doing treatment on a patient
2.Legal duty was breached:– Plaintiff has to prove that defendant failed to take reasonable care
3.Injury caused by breach of duty:– There must a direct and proximate cause of the injury
4.Deviation from the standard care:– plaintiff must show that the standard of care taken by the doctor is less than the generally accepted standard in
doctor's profession
5.Damage: – without damage plaintiff cannot claim for the compensation. He has to show that doctor was negligent in his duties.
4.1.What happened in the movie?
Kareena kapoor has a legal duty towards akshay kumar when she started surgery on him. She breach her duty by leaving her watch in aksahay kumar's
stomach which cause injury to the patient for this akshay kumar could ask for

The Law Of Medical Nefeligence
Thesis presented for the LLM by Alan Raftery The Law of medical negligence, a comparative analysis of the issue of causation in cases of informed
consent in Australia, the United Kingdom and Ireland. Student Number: 13205410. Table of contents. Page(s) Introduction 1–3 Chapter 1: The
doctrine of informed consent Irish courts approach 4 English Courts approach 5–7 Australian courts approach 7–8 Discussion...show more content...
While the cases involving causation in ordinary negligence cases have departed to the material contribution etc the cases involving causation in non
informed cases have taken a different direction. The author will discuss the approaches taken by the Irish, English and Australian courts regarding
causation in non informed cases in medical negligence first. He will then proceed to discuss the approach to causation in ordinary negligence. The
author will then contrast the tow and give an detail analysis on

Medical Negligence Law
FIND ATTORNEYS WHO SPECIALISE IN MEDICO–LEGAL SERVICES The medico–legal community has experienced a rise in medical
negligence claims in the past six years, as patients are becoming more aware of their rights regarding health care and medical treatment. South Africa
has struggled with medical negligence law in the past as there were inefficient procedures for patients to make such claims. However, attorneys in
South Africa are bringing experience and professional legal services to the table to help the public receive justice and compensation after suffering
from medical negligence. Professional attorneys in South Africa Such attorneys can be found at Paul du Plessis Attorneys. We have over 20 years of
experience and specialise in medico–legal

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)