SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 3
Download to read offline
s
NOT FOR SALE TO MINORS
PLUS!
Bram Stoker’s
Dracula
The Making Of Coppola’s
Vampire Tale...
NOT FOR SALE TO MINORS
JJJJJDaniel Radcliffe Talks
Monsters!
Daniel Radcliffe Talks
Monsters!
victorFRANKENSTEIN
ANTISOCIAL 2, INSIDIOUS 3, HANNIBAL, PSYCHO, 21ST CENTURY
FRIGHTS, BEHIND THE SCREAMS, SEIZE THE NIGHT, GAMES,
DVDS/BLU-RAYS, NEWS, REVIEWS, PREVIEWS  MUCH MORE!
Daniel Radcliffe Talks
Monsters!
bite
Bram Stoker’s
Dracula
Paranormal
Activity:
TheGhost
Dimension
Jason Blum Talks Ghosts
Jscream
BLOOD,GUTS, GORE  MORE! WWW.SCREAMHORRORMAG.COM
THE
HORROR
MAGAZINE
ISSUE 33
£4.50
US$8.99
JJThe Hallow
Director Corin Hardy
Talks Dark Folklore
bitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebiteCHAD ARCHIBALD  ELMA BEGOVIC
TALK BODY HORROR
The casting in the title role of the Harry
Potter franchise made Daniel Radcliffe
a household name and with the series
finished he moved onto a variety of roles to
acclaim both in the theatre (notably in the
award winning Equus) and film where he’s
taken dark roles in Horns and The Woman
in Black which went onto become the
most successful British horror film ever,
making over £100m worldwide.
When we first meet Daniel he bounds
into the room unshaven, casually dressed
but with a huge smile. In the flesh he is
noticeably different from his on screen
persona with unusually piercing eyes but
perhaps more surprisingly is his slight
build. It’s difficult to reconcile that this
immensely friendly actor at only 26 years
old is, according to the Times Rich List the
wealthiest actor under 30 in the UK today
with an estimated fortune in excess of £60m.
Since the Potter franchise finished
in 2011 Daniel has continued with an
incredibly busy workload but he was
briefly in London talking about his new
film, Victor Frankenstein where he appears
as the hunchback Igor to James McAvoy’s
title character. The Frankenstein story has
been made so many times it’s difficult to
keep count or indeed to come up with a
new angle but Max Landis (son of director,
John) has written a story which is almost a
‘bromance’ between the two as they work
on creating life from death culminating in
the famous monster.
Daniel was frank and forthcoming, polite
and positive as we spoke to him about the
latest take on the Frankenstein story.
SCREAM: You’re not even 30 yet but you’ve
achieved a position where I’d suggest you’re
influential enough to green light a project
DANIEL RADCLIFFE: Well no not quite
but I’m very flattered and I’ll take the
compliment (Laughs).
SCREAM: Well the story of Frankenstein
has had a quite a chequered history in
terms of cinematic success so this must be
a bit of a gamble to make another film and
there must be a bit of pressure on you?
DANIEL RADCLIFFE: Well I take all
the pressure off myself by not worrying
about those sort of things. I don’t think,
‘How is this going to fit into the cannon of
Frankenstein?’ You can never strategise for
what’s going to be a success. You just go,
‘What excites me and what do I like?’ so I
don’t think there was ever a feeling of, ‘Oh
this is a weighty thing we’re undertaking
here’ and also because we’re doing
something that is so different from the
book there was never a moment I thought,
‘How are the people who like the book
going to feel about this?’ because I know
they’re going to hate it. It’s so different from
the book that if people go into it with that
expectation it will definitely disappoint.
SCREAM: I gather that Shawn Levy from
the Night at the Museum films was going
to direct this originally but dropped out.
What happened there?
Words: Simon Hooper
DANIEL RADCLIFFE TALKS MONSTERS!
VICTOR
FRANKENSTEIN
VICTOR
FRANKENSTEIN
28 www.screamhorrormag.comSCREAM
DANIEL RADCLIFFE: I don’t know,
you’d have to ask him. He went on to do
something else. I really don’t know, it went
quiet for a while and then they came back
with Paul McGuigan which I immediately
was very excited by because the one
thing that I had been concerned about in
the prior incarnation of the script I read
...obviously it was written by Max (Landis)
a young American guy and Shawn is
American. I mean American’s love writing
English people and love writing English
characters to be very verbose, which is
great and fits Victor perfectly but I felt that
some of the baddies in it were a little bit...
they were bad English people as written
by an American who still can’t quite help
but find us charming whereas when Paul
came along we said, ‘No’. I suppose what
I’m saying is that my problem with that is
it seems like Victor would just run rings
round these guys and there wasn’t a real
threat from them to Victor and so when
Paul came on that was one of the first
things we talked about including Andrew
(Scott) for that role which was great and
that’s how that needs to be.
SCREAM: Have you had much say in
getting the script changed?
DANIEL RADCLIFFE: Not hugely. Me and
James did a week of rehearsal where we
went through the script and could say what
we thought worked and what didn’t and
they were very open to that process.
SCREAM: In some scenes there does
seem to be a bit of ad-libbing going on.
DANIEL RADCLIFFE: There is a bit but
not much. The good thing about Max’s
script is the dialogue does feel quick and
snappy and natural. You’ve seen it more
recently than me so you’ll remember it
better but the one thing that was totally
James was the scene where he’s doing
my back and siphoning it off. That thing
was never supposed to go in his mouth it
wasn’t in the script it was James having
two hands free and saying, ‘Well if I had
a hand free this is how you would do it’.
That was great and it was our first scene
together. It was like,‘Great! This is what it’s
going to be like together’.
SCREAM: Now the hair in this is a little bit
acid house raver in a field. I presume those
were extensions you’re wearing?
DANIEL RADCLIFFE: Yes for six months!
SCREAM: That must be incredibly
uncomfortable?
DANIEL RADCLIFFE: I ended up actually
liking it because I could pull it down over
my face and be sort of hidden. My girlfriend
did not like it.
SCREAM: It’s not your best look!
DANIEL RADCLIFFE: (laughs) Well it
kind of is! The thing is I love it when it’s all
shaggy and crazy and messy. It was great
and then I think people were suddenly
unsure what they wanted with the hair so
they started straightening it out. I said, ‘Do
we need to do that?’ but it works. Originally
it looked crazier and that was my idea for
him having all this kind of mad hair it would
get dirty and wouldn’t get much better but
I think they wanted me looking a bit more
polished after the transformation.
SCREAM: I’ve got to talk about the
Monster. At what point did you become
aware of what it would look like? You’ve got
two guys, Spencer and Guillame playing it
and with all that’s going on in those scenes
it can’t have been easy for anyone.
DANIEL RADCLIFFE: I’m glad they both
get credit because it was hard on both of
them. We were under rain machines for
3 weeks and they wear wearing nothing
except those prosthetics and they were
freezing. Rain machine rain is big and
cold. They had a tough time. I suppose I
first became aware of what the monster
looked like really early on actually. Paul
was showing me concepts and designs for
it and he was always very insistent that it
be played by an actor rather than entirely
a visual effect and that we had something
there to interact with. I’m fine with CGI. I’ve
done a lot with it but it’s definitely much
nicer to have something there.
SCREAM: You’ve done quite a bit of horror
in the past with The Woman in Black and
Horns and now this.
DANIEL RADCLIFFE: Well I’d say the
pedigree of this is horror.
SCREAM: So what’s the attraction of these
much darker subjects?
DANIEL RADCLIFFE: It’s absolutely not to
do with horror or fantasy. No! It is to do with
fantasy not necessarily horror. I love films that
do what they like, that explore other worlds or
explore the mixing of other worlds with ours.
I find that most of what I read is sort of not
fantasy necessarily but magical realism.
SCREAM: Do you not like horror?
DANIEL RADCLIFFE: I do like horror but
I’m scared shitless by it as well. It’s not
the reason I pick these films because I’m
a horror fan but given what people come
to expect from horror movies this... well,
there’s a couple, of moments that will make
you jump in this movie.
SCREAM: You say horror films scare you...
an example would be?
DANIEL RADCLIFFE: An example would
be… I’m one of those people that will see
the trailer for The Babadook and I’ll go, ‘Oh,
I can’t watch that!’
SCREAM: So it’s more creepy films than
blood guts and gore.
29www.screamhorrormag.com SCREAM
DANIEL RADCLIFFE: Oh no, they would
creep me out too. I don’t watch those they
would just traumatise me. I’ll still watch the
blood guts and gore but...
SCREAM: But Woman in Black is still very
creepy.
DANIEL RADCLIFFE: Oh I would never
have watched that if I hadn’t been in it. No, I
get really freaked out.
SCREAM: James Watkins, the director, did
a great job on that film.
DANIEL RADCLIFFE: It was great fun to
make. There’s something about making a
movie – the bit where we had a face on the
window pane and her face coming up...
when James explained what we were doing
I thought, ‘Oh this is great. This’ll scare the
shit out of people’. There’s a real sort of
sadistic joy you get out of doing that. You
know there’s always one boy in every class
who’s like 8 years old who has a party and
they all watch Scream or something and I’m
like, ‘NO’, that would scare me too much.
I watched Alien when I was really young
and that was too much. Why do we watch
all these things when we were so young?
Terrible. I was always the kid who’d have to
leave the room.
SCREAM: So do you have a favourite
horror film?
DANIEL RADCLIFFE: One of my favourites
which is because I was doing Woman in
Black was James’ first movie Eden Lake. I
love those films where this could happen. It
is horror but could also very much happen
and that the fact that the ending of that film
gives me confidence that you could write
any type of ending you fucking like. It does
not have to be happy, not everything has to
be resolved, you can end it with a punch to
the gut.
SCREAM: Yes it had the confidence to
have a downbeat ending.
DANIEL RADCLIFFE: Exactly and it’s such
a huge thing that everyone’s, ‘Oh, you can’t
do that!’ No! You can! What happened to
these people is terrible.
SCREAM: But the position you’re in now
you do have the sway to get the script
changed.
DANIEL RADCLIFFE: Yes well definitely.
I mean the end of this script was different
because it was absolutely teeing up a
sequel in the most obvious way. I mean
you just cut to James and I and we were
in a new setting, I mean a very different
setting. We’re not in Victorian England
anymore we’re in another part of the world
and James had the same reaction. When
we met at rehearsal the first thing we talked
about was, ‘We can’t do that!’ I always feel
there’s something very presumptuous about
doing that. I mean let’s just concentrate
on making one good film before we think
of another and also like... I can’t speak for
James entirely but I’ve done a franchise,
he’s currently in a franchise and neither of
us are looking for another one right now. It
still leaves it open but you should have seen
what was there before.
SCREAM: Did you speak to Max about it?
DANIEL RADCLIFFE: We spoke to Paul
about it, absolutely. I’ve not had a huge
amount of interaction with Max about the
script but it was mostly done with Paul. I
don’t like it when I see it in other movies
and I didn’t want to be part of that.
SCREAM: Ahh, so you are in a position to
change things.
DANIEL RADCLIFFE: Yes but earlier
you said to green light a film which is very
different and there’s not many people who
can do that.
SCREAM: But your name does sell a film.
DANIEL RADCLIFFE: It helps but it
doesn’t sell it entirely but it helps which is a
great position to be in but I wouldn’t want
anyone reading this to think that I can get a
green light on my own. No, no, no.
SCREAM: I know your character died in the
first Woman In Black film but you didn’t get
involved with the sequel.
DANIEL RADCLIFFE: Well it’s a supernatural
film so there were ways of coming back but
I didn’t feel that was for me, no.
SCREAM: Thanks for talking to SCREAM,
Daniel.
DANIEL RADCLIFFE: Thank you so much.
VICTOR FRANKENSTEIN opens in the UK
on December 4th.
30 www.screamhorrormag.comSCREAM

More Related Content

What's hot

Damon and Elena ppt
Damon and Elena pptDamon and Elena ppt
Damon and Elena ppt
hrodg93
 
The DE Project- For Ian Somerhalder
The DE Project- For Ian SomerhalderThe DE Project- For Ian Somerhalder
The DE Project- For Ian Somerhalder
hrodg93
 
Script Three Irish Lads & Some Dead Fella
Script Three Irish Lads & Some Dead FellaScript Three Irish Lads & Some Dead Fella
Script Three Irish Lads & Some Dead Fella
Joe Lane
 

What's hot (16)

Andy patrick's portrait of jason
Andy patrick's portrait of jasonAndy patrick's portrait of jason
Andy patrick's portrait of jason
 
Choices in Task Inspiration
Choices in Task InspirationChoices in Task Inspiration
Choices in Task Inspiration
 
Choices in task inspiration
Choices in task inspirationChoices in task inspiration
Choices in task inspiration
 
Genre of my Preliminary Task
Genre of my Preliminary TaskGenre of my Preliminary Task
Genre of my Preliminary Task
 
Damon and Elena ppt
Damon and Elena pptDamon and Elena ppt
Damon and Elena ppt
 
The DE Project- For Ian Somerhalder
The DE Project- For Ian SomerhalderThe DE Project- For Ian Somerhalder
The DE Project- For Ian Somerhalder
 
Brawn Portfolio_small
Brawn Portfolio_smallBrawn Portfolio_small
Brawn Portfolio_small
 
The Eastside Story City of Lost Souls
The Eastside Story City of Lost SoulsThe Eastside Story City of Lost Souls
The Eastside Story City of Lost Souls
 
Script Three Irish Lads & Some Dead Fella
Script Three Irish Lads & Some Dead FellaScript Three Irish Lads & Some Dead Fella
Script Three Irish Lads & Some Dead Fella
 
Sarah_Paulson
Sarah_PaulsonSarah_Paulson
Sarah_Paulson
 
R.K.Lilley - Up in air trilogy ( 2nd book "Mile High" )
R.K.Lilley - Up in air trilogy ( 2nd book "Mile High" )R.K.Lilley - Up in air trilogy ( 2nd book "Mile High" )
R.K.Lilley - Up in air trilogy ( 2nd book "Mile High" )
 
Superman: Secret Origin
Superman: Secret OriginSuperman: Secret Origin
Superman: Secret Origin
 
R.K.Lilley - Up in air trilogy ( 3rd book "Grounded )
R.K.Lilley - Up in air trilogy ( 3rd book "Grounded )R.K.Lilley - Up in air trilogy ( 3rd book "Grounded )
R.K.Lilley - Up in air trilogy ( 3rd book "Grounded )
 
Oscars Red Carpet 2016
Oscars Red Carpet 2016Oscars Red Carpet 2016
Oscars Red Carpet 2016
 
Pilot Script (Final Network Draft)
Pilot Script  (Final Network Draft)Pilot Script  (Final Network Draft)
Pilot Script (Final Network Draft)
 
13.16 Scoobynatural script
13.16 Scoobynatural script13.16 Scoobynatural script
13.16 Scoobynatural script
 

Viewers also liked

C O N S C I O U S N E S S T O C O N S C I E N C E D R
C O N S C I O U S N E S S  T O  C O N S C I E N C E  D RC O N S C I O U S N E S S  T O  C O N S C I E N C E  D R
C O N S C I O U S N E S S T O C O N S C I E N C E D R
ghanyog
 
MISSED INCOMETAX RETURN FILLING DUE DATE, NOW WHAT????
MISSED INCOMETAX RETURN FILLING DUE DATE, NOW WHAT????MISSED INCOMETAX RETURN FILLING DUE DATE, NOW WHAT????
MISSED INCOMETAX RETURN FILLING DUE DATE, NOW WHAT????
CA Gourang Shah
 
оюутны эрдмийн чуулган 2016
оюутны эрдмийн чуулган 2016оюутны эрдмийн чуулган 2016
оюутны эрдмийн чуулган 2016
enkhzaya badarch
 
Multiliteral Agreement Announcement
Multiliteral Agreement AnnouncementMultiliteral Agreement Announcement
Multiliteral Agreement Announcement
batnasanb
 
Over fosfor en fosfaat AcconAvm 9 dec. 2015 a.baken@planet.nl
Over fosfor en fosfaat AcconAvm 9 dec. 2015 a.baken@planet.nlOver fosfor en fosfaat AcconAvm 9 dec. 2015 a.baken@planet.nl
Over fosfor en fosfaat AcconAvm 9 dec. 2015 a.baken@planet.nl
Adviesbureau voor agro-ecologie
 
Tutorías Compartidas
Tutorías CompartidasTutorías Compartidas
Tutorías Compartidas
10enero64
 
Ч.Отгонжаргал - Соёл урлагийн байгууллагуудын стратеги төлөвлөлт
Ч.Отгонжаргал - Соёл урлагийн байгууллагуудын стратеги төлөвлөлтЧ.Отгонжаргал - Соёл урлагийн байгууллагуудын стратеги төлөвлөлт
Ч.Отгонжаргал - Соёл урлагийн байгууллагуудын стратеги төлөвлөлт
batnasanb
 
Lecture4,5
Lecture4,5Lecture4,5
Lecture4,5
Bbujee
 

Viewers also liked (19)

C O N S C I O U S N E S S T O C O N S C I E N C E D R
C O N S C I O U S N E S S  T O  C O N S C I E N C E  D RC O N S C I O U S N E S S  T O  C O N S C I E N C E  D R
C O N S C I O U S N E S S T O C O N S C I E N C E D R
 
MISSED INCOMETAX RETURN FILLING DUE DATE, NOW WHAT????
MISSED INCOMETAX RETURN FILLING DUE DATE, NOW WHAT????MISSED INCOMETAX RETURN FILLING DUE DATE, NOW WHAT????
MISSED INCOMETAX RETURN FILLING DUE DATE, NOW WHAT????
 
1020082552 010
1020082552 0101020082552 010
1020082552 010
 
оюутны эрдмийн чуулган 2016
оюутны эрдмийн чуулган 2016оюутны эрдмийн чуулган 2016
оюутны эрдмийн чуулган 2016
 
Multiliteral Agreement Announcement
Multiliteral Agreement AnnouncementMultiliteral Agreement Announcement
Multiliteral Agreement Announcement
 
Over fosfor en fosfaat AcconAvm 9 dec. 2015 a.baken@planet.nl
Over fosfor en fosfaat AcconAvm 9 dec. 2015 a.baken@planet.nlOver fosfor en fosfaat AcconAvm 9 dec. 2015 a.baken@planet.nl
Over fosfor en fosfaat AcconAvm 9 dec. 2015 a.baken@planet.nl
 
Tutorías Compartidas
Tutorías CompartidasTutorías Compartidas
Tutorías Compartidas
 
Budget sample
Budget sampleBudget sample
Budget sample
 
Електричне коло
Електричне колоЕлектричне коло
Електричне коло
 
Лабораторна робота №4
Лабораторна робота №4Лабораторна робота №4
Лабораторна робота №4
 
Сила струму. Вимірювання сили струму
Сила струму. Вимірювання сили струмуСила струму. Вимірювання сили струму
Сила струму. Вимірювання сили струму
 
Ahisan test2015
Ahisan test2015Ahisan test2015
Ahisan test2015
 
C N P cycles
C N P cyclesC N P cycles
C N P cycles
 
500-cau-trac-nghiem-luat-kinh-te-co-dap-an-p5
500-cau-trac-nghiem-luat-kinh-te-co-dap-an-p5500-cau-trac-nghiem-luat-kinh-te-co-dap-an-p5
500-cau-trac-nghiem-luat-kinh-te-co-dap-an-p5
 
500-cau-trac-nghiem-luat-kinh-te-co-dap-an-p1
500-cau-trac-nghiem-luat-kinh-te-co-dap-an-p1500-cau-trac-nghiem-luat-kinh-te-co-dap-an-p1
500-cau-trac-nghiem-luat-kinh-te-co-dap-an-p1
 
Libro Física 1- Ejercicios resueltos - Luís Rodríguez Valencia
Libro Física 1- Ejercicios resueltos - Luís Rodríguez ValenciaLibro Física 1- Ejercicios resueltos - Luís Rodríguez Valencia
Libro Física 1- Ejercicios resueltos - Luís Rodríguez Valencia
 
Tsho lekts 1
Tsho lekts  1Tsho lekts  1
Tsho lekts 1
 
Ч.Отгонжаргал - Соёл урлагийн байгууллагуудын стратеги төлөвлөлт
Ч.Отгонжаргал - Соёл урлагийн байгууллагуудын стратеги төлөвлөлтЧ.Отгонжаргал - Соёл урлагийн байгууллагуудын стратеги төлөвлөлт
Ч.Отгонжаргал - Соёл урлагийн байгууллагуудын стратеги төлөвлөлт
 
Lecture4,5
Lecture4,5Lecture4,5
Lecture4,5
 

Similar to Victor (20)

Insidious
InsidiousInsidious
Insidious
 
Double page spread planning simran kaur
Double page spread planning simran kaurDouble page spread planning simran kaur
Double page spread planning simran kaur
 
Task 10 research
Task 10 researchTask 10 research
Task 10 research
 
Task 10 research
Task 10 researchTask 10 research
Task 10 research
 
Task 10 research article
Task 10 research articleTask 10 research article
Task 10 research article
 
Task 10 research article
Task 10 research articleTask 10 research article
Task 10 research article
 
Mode of language
Mode of languageMode of language
Mode of language
 
Mode of language
Mode of languageMode of language
Mode of language
 
AS Media Coursework: Radcliffe Interview.
AS Media Coursework: Radcliffe Interview.AS Media Coursework: Radcliffe Interview.
AS Media Coursework: Radcliffe Interview.
 
Daniel radcliffe nme article moa
Daniel radcliffe nme article   moaDaniel radcliffe nme article   moa
Daniel radcliffe nme article moa
 
Mode of language
Mode of languageMode of language
Mode of language
 
Daniel radcliffe article
Daniel radcliffe articleDaniel radcliffe article
Daniel radcliffe article
 
Media planning dps
Media planning dpsMedia planning dps
Media planning dps
 
Task 10 research article
Task 10 research articleTask 10 research article
Task 10 research article
 
Task 10 in design explanation for stick
Task 10 in design explanation for stickTask 10 in design explanation for stick
Task 10 in design explanation for stick
 
Planning DPS - Emily Climer
Planning DPS - Emily ClimerPlanning DPS - Emily Climer
Planning DPS - Emily Climer
 
Planning dps
Planning dpsPlanning dps
Planning dps
 
Planning for my dps
Planning for my dpsPlanning for my dps
Planning for my dps
 
Daniel radcliffe - Nicole Hickman
Daniel radcliffe - Nicole HickmanDaniel radcliffe - Nicole Hickman
Daniel radcliffe - Nicole Hickman
 
Planning dps
Planning dpsPlanning dps
Planning dps
 

Victor

  • 1. s NOT FOR SALE TO MINORS PLUS! Bram Stoker’s Dracula The Making Of Coppola’s Vampire Tale... NOT FOR SALE TO MINORS JJJJJDaniel Radcliffe Talks Monsters! Daniel Radcliffe Talks Monsters! victorFRANKENSTEIN ANTISOCIAL 2, INSIDIOUS 3, HANNIBAL, PSYCHO, 21ST CENTURY FRIGHTS, BEHIND THE SCREAMS, SEIZE THE NIGHT, GAMES, DVDS/BLU-RAYS, NEWS, REVIEWS, PREVIEWS MUCH MORE! Daniel Radcliffe Talks Monsters! bite Bram Stoker’s Dracula Paranormal Activity: TheGhost Dimension Jason Blum Talks Ghosts Jscream BLOOD,GUTS, GORE MORE! WWW.SCREAMHORRORMAG.COM THE HORROR MAGAZINE ISSUE 33 £4.50 US$8.99 JJThe Hallow Director Corin Hardy Talks Dark Folklore bitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebitebiteCHAD ARCHIBALD ELMA BEGOVIC TALK BODY HORROR
  • 2. The casting in the title role of the Harry Potter franchise made Daniel Radcliffe a household name and with the series finished he moved onto a variety of roles to acclaim both in the theatre (notably in the award winning Equus) and film where he’s taken dark roles in Horns and The Woman in Black which went onto become the most successful British horror film ever, making over £100m worldwide. When we first meet Daniel he bounds into the room unshaven, casually dressed but with a huge smile. In the flesh he is noticeably different from his on screen persona with unusually piercing eyes but perhaps more surprisingly is his slight build. It’s difficult to reconcile that this immensely friendly actor at only 26 years old is, according to the Times Rich List the wealthiest actor under 30 in the UK today with an estimated fortune in excess of £60m. Since the Potter franchise finished in 2011 Daniel has continued with an incredibly busy workload but he was briefly in London talking about his new film, Victor Frankenstein where he appears as the hunchback Igor to James McAvoy’s title character. The Frankenstein story has been made so many times it’s difficult to keep count or indeed to come up with a new angle but Max Landis (son of director, John) has written a story which is almost a ‘bromance’ between the two as they work on creating life from death culminating in the famous monster. Daniel was frank and forthcoming, polite and positive as we spoke to him about the latest take on the Frankenstein story. SCREAM: You’re not even 30 yet but you’ve achieved a position where I’d suggest you’re influential enough to green light a project DANIEL RADCLIFFE: Well no not quite but I’m very flattered and I’ll take the compliment (Laughs). SCREAM: Well the story of Frankenstein has had a quite a chequered history in terms of cinematic success so this must be a bit of a gamble to make another film and there must be a bit of pressure on you? DANIEL RADCLIFFE: Well I take all the pressure off myself by not worrying about those sort of things. I don’t think, ‘How is this going to fit into the cannon of Frankenstein?’ You can never strategise for what’s going to be a success. You just go, ‘What excites me and what do I like?’ so I don’t think there was ever a feeling of, ‘Oh this is a weighty thing we’re undertaking here’ and also because we’re doing something that is so different from the book there was never a moment I thought, ‘How are the people who like the book going to feel about this?’ because I know they’re going to hate it. It’s so different from the book that if people go into it with that expectation it will definitely disappoint. SCREAM: I gather that Shawn Levy from the Night at the Museum films was going to direct this originally but dropped out. What happened there? Words: Simon Hooper DANIEL RADCLIFFE TALKS MONSTERS! VICTOR FRANKENSTEIN VICTOR FRANKENSTEIN 28 www.screamhorrormag.comSCREAM DANIEL RADCLIFFE: I don’t know, you’d have to ask him. He went on to do something else. I really don’t know, it went quiet for a while and then they came back with Paul McGuigan which I immediately was very excited by because the one thing that I had been concerned about in the prior incarnation of the script I read ...obviously it was written by Max (Landis) a young American guy and Shawn is American. I mean American’s love writing English people and love writing English characters to be very verbose, which is great and fits Victor perfectly but I felt that some of the baddies in it were a little bit... they were bad English people as written by an American who still can’t quite help but find us charming whereas when Paul came along we said, ‘No’. I suppose what I’m saying is that my problem with that is it seems like Victor would just run rings round these guys and there wasn’t a real threat from them to Victor and so when Paul came on that was one of the first things we talked about including Andrew (Scott) for that role which was great and that’s how that needs to be. SCREAM: Have you had much say in getting the script changed? DANIEL RADCLIFFE: Not hugely. Me and James did a week of rehearsal where we went through the script and could say what we thought worked and what didn’t and they were very open to that process. SCREAM: In some scenes there does seem to be a bit of ad-libbing going on. DANIEL RADCLIFFE: There is a bit but not much. The good thing about Max’s script is the dialogue does feel quick and snappy and natural. You’ve seen it more recently than me so you’ll remember it better but the one thing that was totally James was the scene where he’s doing my back and siphoning it off. That thing was never supposed to go in his mouth it wasn’t in the script it was James having two hands free and saying, ‘Well if I had a hand free this is how you would do it’. That was great and it was our first scene together. It was like,‘Great! This is what it’s going to be like together’. SCREAM: Now the hair in this is a little bit acid house raver in a field. I presume those were extensions you’re wearing? DANIEL RADCLIFFE: Yes for six months! SCREAM: That must be incredibly uncomfortable? DANIEL RADCLIFFE: I ended up actually liking it because I could pull it down over my face and be sort of hidden. My girlfriend did not like it. SCREAM: It’s not your best look! DANIEL RADCLIFFE: (laughs) Well it kind of is! The thing is I love it when it’s all shaggy and crazy and messy. It was great and then I think people were suddenly unsure what they wanted with the hair so they started straightening it out. I said, ‘Do we need to do that?’ but it works. Originally it looked crazier and that was my idea for him having all this kind of mad hair it would get dirty and wouldn’t get much better but I think they wanted me looking a bit more polished after the transformation. SCREAM: I’ve got to talk about the Monster. At what point did you become aware of what it would look like? You’ve got two guys, Spencer and Guillame playing it and with all that’s going on in those scenes it can’t have been easy for anyone. DANIEL RADCLIFFE: I’m glad they both get credit because it was hard on both of them. We were under rain machines for 3 weeks and they wear wearing nothing except those prosthetics and they were freezing. Rain machine rain is big and cold. They had a tough time. I suppose I first became aware of what the monster looked like really early on actually. Paul was showing me concepts and designs for it and he was always very insistent that it be played by an actor rather than entirely a visual effect and that we had something there to interact with. I’m fine with CGI. I’ve done a lot with it but it’s definitely much nicer to have something there. SCREAM: You’ve done quite a bit of horror in the past with The Woman in Black and Horns and now this. DANIEL RADCLIFFE: Well I’d say the pedigree of this is horror. SCREAM: So what’s the attraction of these much darker subjects? DANIEL RADCLIFFE: It’s absolutely not to do with horror or fantasy. No! It is to do with fantasy not necessarily horror. I love films that do what they like, that explore other worlds or explore the mixing of other worlds with ours. I find that most of what I read is sort of not fantasy necessarily but magical realism. SCREAM: Do you not like horror? DANIEL RADCLIFFE: I do like horror but I’m scared shitless by it as well. It’s not the reason I pick these films because I’m a horror fan but given what people come to expect from horror movies this... well, there’s a couple, of moments that will make you jump in this movie. SCREAM: You say horror films scare you... an example would be? DANIEL RADCLIFFE: An example would be… I’m one of those people that will see the trailer for The Babadook and I’ll go, ‘Oh, I can’t watch that!’ SCREAM: So it’s more creepy films than blood guts and gore. 29www.screamhorrormag.com SCREAM
  • 3. DANIEL RADCLIFFE: Oh no, they would creep me out too. I don’t watch those they would just traumatise me. I’ll still watch the blood guts and gore but... SCREAM: But Woman in Black is still very creepy. DANIEL RADCLIFFE: Oh I would never have watched that if I hadn’t been in it. No, I get really freaked out. SCREAM: James Watkins, the director, did a great job on that film. DANIEL RADCLIFFE: It was great fun to make. There’s something about making a movie – the bit where we had a face on the window pane and her face coming up... when James explained what we were doing I thought, ‘Oh this is great. This’ll scare the shit out of people’. There’s a real sort of sadistic joy you get out of doing that. You know there’s always one boy in every class who’s like 8 years old who has a party and they all watch Scream or something and I’m like, ‘NO’, that would scare me too much. I watched Alien when I was really young and that was too much. Why do we watch all these things when we were so young? Terrible. I was always the kid who’d have to leave the room. SCREAM: So do you have a favourite horror film? DANIEL RADCLIFFE: One of my favourites which is because I was doing Woman in Black was James’ first movie Eden Lake. I love those films where this could happen. It is horror but could also very much happen and that the fact that the ending of that film gives me confidence that you could write any type of ending you fucking like. It does not have to be happy, not everything has to be resolved, you can end it with a punch to the gut. SCREAM: Yes it had the confidence to have a downbeat ending. DANIEL RADCLIFFE: Exactly and it’s such a huge thing that everyone’s, ‘Oh, you can’t do that!’ No! You can! What happened to these people is terrible. SCREAM: But the position you’re in now you do have the sway to get the script changed. DANIEL RADCLIFFE: Yes well definitely. I mean the end of this script was different because it was absolutely teeing up a sequel in the most obvious way. I mean you just cut to James and I and we were in a new setting, I mean a very different setting. We’re not in Victorian England anymore we’re in another part of the world and James had the same reaction. When we met at rehearsal the first thing we talked about was, ‘We can’t do that!’ I always feel there’s something very presumptuous about doing that. I mean let’s just concentrate on making one good film before we think of another and also like... I can’t speak for James entirely but I’ve done a franchise, he’s currently in a franchise and neither of us are looking for another one right now. It still leaves it open but you should have seen what was there before. SCREAM: Did you speak to Max about it? DANIEL RADCLIFFE: We spoke to Paul about it, absolutely. I’ve not had a huge amount of interaction with Max about the script but it was mostly done with Paul. I don’t like it when I see it in other movies and I didn’t want to be part of that. SCREAM: Ahh, so you are in a position to change things. DANIEL RADCLIFFE: Yes but earlier you said to green light a film which is very different and there’s not many people who can do that. SCREAM: But your name does sell a film. DANIEL RADCLIFFE: It helps but it doesn’t sell it entirely but it helps which is a great position to be in but I wouldn’t want anyone reading this to think that I can get a green light on my own. No, no, no. SCREAM: I know your character died in the first Woman In Black film but you didn’t get involved with the sequel. DANIEL RADCLIFFE: Well it’s a supernatural film so there were ways of coming back but I didn’t feel that was for me, no. SCREAM: Thanks for talking to SCREAM, Daniel. DANIEL RADCLIFFE: Thank you so much. VICTOR FRANKENSTEIN opens in the UK on December 4th. 30 www.screamhorrormag.comSCREAM