About CMU-SPP: The Chiang Mai University School of Public Policy is the first public policy school established in Thailand. Offers graduate programs in public policy for academically ambitious students from within the region and beyond.
Read more - www.spp.cmu.ac.th
________________________________________________________
Connect CMU-SPP
Get the latest news: http://www.spp.cmu.ac.th/
Find SPP on Facebook: https://bit.ly/2RARA5e
Follow SPP on Twitter: https://bit.ly/2F7oAuZ
Follow SPP on Instagram: https://bit.ly/2LOkglG
» Subscribe to SPP youtube channel: https://bit.ly/2QoWYnc
2. The first year of our new CMU School of Public Policy (CMU-SPP) has been very eventful.
We conducted several key research projects for the northern region of Thailand
including the haze issue, urban mobility, and smart city.
We officially launched our PhD and MA in Public Policy programs.
The School also started a series of Policy Market platforms to engage with
stakeholders in constructive policy dialogues. They were on energy policy, blockchain
technology, urban development, and disability or the differently abled.
We also conducted several workshops on scenario planning for clients in Thailand.
We could not have accomplished all of this without the full support from
Chiang Mai University - the University Council members, the President,
and all the Vice-Presidents. We would like to also thank all our key partners
for believing in our work and trusting us.
We look forward to working with all of you again.
Message from the
Director
3. To make Asia more sustainable for all by supporting sound public policies, encouraging
responsible leadership, and providing collaborative platforms
Production of research work and
public policy specialists that are nationally
and inter- nationally recognized.
- To generate top quality research products and platforms, with cross- disciplinary
approach founded on reli- able information, that can help en- hance
public policy decisions.
- To train scholars and practitioners in skills related to public policy including
policy-making, policy analysis, policy communication, and policy advocacy.
- To shape new discourses on our un- derstanding and practices of public policy
processes in the world.
Vision
Mission
Values
INCLUSIVE
INNOVATIVE
PROGRESSIVE
4. Smart
City
CMU-SPP mobilized stakeholders of Chiang Mai
to conceptualize the Chiang Mai Smart City Plan.
A comprehensive website in Thai, English, and Chinese,
a logo, and 24 short videos were produced to generate ideas.
Numerous workshops, including with TEDx Chiangmai,
were held to publicize the concept. The Plan focuses on
addressing smart city, not just as the opportunity for
technological advancement but also for Chiang Mai to rethink
its urban development strategies, as well as for Chiang Mai
people, including migrants and residents, to become
constructive citizens of the city. Our research cautions
public leaders against blindly investing in technology.
The Plan suggests dividing between investments in
the physical platform (mobility and environment),
the digital platform (government and economy), and
the deliberative platform (people and living).
Each platform has short-term, medium-term,
and long-term projects. It endorses three flagship projects,
which are
1) Smart Nimman,
2) 30 Minute City, and
3) Heritage City.
One key aspect of this project is that it requires future
thinking and design thinking skills, in addition to deliberative
and facilitative skills. With rational and analytical
thinking alone, it would be difficult to imagine all possibilities
for the city.
5. Haze
Thailand
Free
In collaboration with the wider cluster of Haze Free
Thailand research projects, our research on the haze issue in
Northern Thailand confirms that this transboundary
air pollution problem is a classic example of a wicked and
complex problem. It also depicts problems of income
inequality between highlanders and city dwellers.
The problem has endured for a long time (over 10 years),
there are many factors involved such as climate, geographical
location, wind direction, and economic and land use behav-
iors.
The problem is also related to behaviors of the general
public in burning, and the complex relationship between
highlanders and forest fires. Recently,
the problem is considered transboundary because
the forest fires originate from all the countries in the region
and not just Thailand. CMU-SPP has provided a holistic plan
for the Provincial Office to tackle is complex issue. The Plan
suggest four key strategies
1) People
2) City
3) Forest
4) Livelihood
For the people, first and foremost is to raise awareness
on the harm of haze and small dust particles. For the city,
it is crucial, to create a smart, clean, and green city of
Chiang Mai. This is to help protect the citizens with a place of
sanctuary. For the forest, it is suggested to proactively pro-
tect the remaining parts and to add new protected areas.
Lastly for the livelihoods, it is important to create new high
value-added economic opportunities for the highlanders.
This is in the hopes that there will be less slash and burn
activities in the mountains.
6. Urban
Mobility
Chiang Mai and nearby provinces lack basic
infrastructure for intra-provincial transportation.
All the municipalities also lack descent public transportation.
This studied investigated the mobility capacity of people
in the upper north region of Thailand. As expected, the cost of
travel between cities of northern provinces is very high.
This impedes strong economic growth between cities.
The study also investigated parking spaces and the possibility
of other modes of public transport in Chiang Mai city,
particularly in the Nimman district.
CMU-SPP suggests strategies to reform laws and
the setup of a committee to oversee transportation systems
in the city. Hence, there is an urgent need to merge varying
modalities of transportation. From this study, CMU-SPP
proposes two plans. One for the overall transportation policy
for Chiang Mai and nearby satellite cities.
The other for managing the parking space on Nimman road.
This issue requires a re-interpretation of the problem
(i.e. traffic jam to mobility capacity), needs futures thinking
to imagine the possibilities, and also needs technical
expertise on urban transport and public parking to come up
with such plans.
7. Training
CMU-SPP conducted a multi-level training program for officials of Northern Thailand called
‘Helicopter View’. The training program, aimed at junior, mid-level, and high-level public officials,
focused on 21st century skill sets for public officials. They are design thinking, futures thinking,
complexity thinking, and collaborative skills. Over 110 officials were trained over a three months
period. Participants were able to prepare project ideas for their respective fields of responsibility
such as eco-tourism, aging society, heritage tourism, and agro-tourism.
In addition, CMU-SPP conducted two training programs on scenario planning and foresight,
one for the Chiang Mai University planning team, and the other for 20 leaders of public universities
in Thailand. The first program led to the formation of four future scenarios for Chiang Mai city,
which in turn helped to shape the university’s strategic plans. The second program opened leaders’
views toward the future of higher education and universities in Thailand. Many saw the need to
design new educational products, to provide online learning platforms, and to merge existing
traditional disciplinary programs. Based on our trainings on futures skills,
CMU-SPP is now a proud member of Thailand’s Futurists Network,
led by the National Innovation Agency of Thailand.
8. Policy
Market
CMU-SPP designed a platform called ‘Policy Market’
to facilitate processes for deliberative policy analysis.
We designed it based on the aim to compliment empirical
information with an opportunity for stakeholders to
deliberate on policies and public projects. It is modeled on
the concept of mini-publics. It is also an offline channel for
CMU-SPP to ‘share our story’ and co-create ideas and
re-define issues with other actors in a given policy arena. The
philosophy of the platform it that it is a non-hierarchical
space, like a market, for people who are interested to freely
join and participate. The platform does not encourage
formalities, usage of titles, and bureaucratic language.
In 2018, we organized four events.
1) Policy Market EP1: Energy Policy Options
2) Policy Market EP2: Blockchain and
the Future of Public Policy
3) Policy Market EP3: Urban Expo
4) Policy Market EP4: Differently Abled
Products from these events include policy briefs,
videos, social media blogs, and poster for dissemination.
We look forward to continuing organizing meaningful events
for Thailand and the Asian region.
9. Policy Market EP:3
The Northern Thailand EXPO
Policy Market EP:4
Differently Abled
Policy Market EP:1
Energy Policy Option
Policy Market EP:2
Blockchian & Future of Public Policy
11. International
Publications
1. Boossabong, Piyapong (2018) “Articulating multi-actors in planning food systems in Bangkok”.
Integrating Food into Urban Planning, eds. Cabannes, Yves and Marocchino, Cecilia. London: UCL Press.
2. Boossabong, Piyapong (2018) “Governing Bangkok’s City Food System: Engaging Multi-Stakeholders for Smart,
Sustainable and Inclusive Growth Journal of City”. Culture and Society, 7(3).
3. Fischer, Frank., Boossabong, Piyapong (2018) “Deliberative Policy Analysis”. Oxford Handbook of
Deliberative Democracy, ed. A. Bächtiger, J. Dryzek, J. Mansbridge and M. Warren. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
4. Boossabong, Piyapong (2018) “Community-based Food Production”. Routledge Handbook of
Urbanization in Southeast Asia, ed. Padawangi, Rita. London: Routledge.
5. Boossabong, Piyapong (2018) “Collaborative Urban Farming Networks: To Promote Community Gardens and
Alternative Markets as Theaters of Social Action”. Cities in Asia by and for the People, ed. Cabannes, Yves.
Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
6. Chaiyapa, W., Nguyen, K.N., Ahmed, A., Vu, Q.T.H., Bueno, M., Wang, Z., Nguyen, K.T., Nguyen, N.T., Duong, T.T.,
Dinh, U.T.T. and Sjögren, A. (2018) “Public perception of biofuel usage in Vietnam”. Biofuels, pp.1-13.
7. Chaiyapa, W., Esteban, M. and Kameyama, Y. (2018) “Why go green? Discourse analysis of motivations for
Thailand’s oil and gas companies to invest in renewable energy”. Energy Policy, 120, pp.448-459.
8. Lebel L, Lebel P, Chuah CJ. (2018) “Governance of aquaculture water use”. International Journal of
Water Resources Development: 1-23
9. Lebel L, Käkönen M, Dany V, Lebel P, Thuon T, Voladet S (2018) “The framing and governance of climate change
adaptation projects in Lao PDR and Cambodia”. International Environmental Agreements: 18: 429.
10. Lebel L, Lebel P, Chitmanat C, Uppanunchai A, Apirumanekul C. (2018) “Managing the risks from the
water-related impacts of extreme weather and uncertain climate change on inland aquaculture in
Northern Thailand”. Water International: p. 1-24.
11. Lebel P, Lebel L, Singphonphrai D, Duangsuwan C, Zhou Y. (2018) “Making space for women: civil society
organizations, gender and hydropower development in the Mekong region”.
International Journal of Water Resources Development: p. 1-21
Publications in Thai
1. Boossabong, Piyapong., Chamchong, Pobsook., Decoding Local Policy in Thailand: The Emergence of Policy
Networks and Their Collaboration (2561) วารสารรัฐศาสตร์และรัฐประศาสนศาสตร์, 9(2)
2. พบสุข ช�่ำชอง., ความร่วมมือระหว่างองค์กรปกครองส่วนท้องถิ่นในบริบทสากล: เหตุผล รูปแบบ
และเงื่อนไขความส�ำเร็จ (2561) วารสารการบริหารท้องถิ่น, 11(3) (1-22)
3. ปิยะพงษ์ บุษบงก์., พบสุข ช�่ำชอง., การให้ความส�ำคัญกับเครือข่ายในทางนโยบายสาธารณะและการบริหารจัดการ:
มุมมองเชิงวิพากษ์และกรอบการวิเคราะห์ส�ำหรับข้ามพ้นสัญญะที่กลวงเปล่า (2561)
วารสารสังคมศาสตร์, 14(2) (123-136)
4. พบสุข ช�่ำชอง., ปิยะพงษ์ บุษบงก์., ความร่วมมือระหว่างองค์กรปกครองส่วนท้องถิ่นในการจัดบริการสาธารณะ (2561)
เอกสารชุดค�ำสอน วิชาการปกครองท้องถิ่น มหาวิทยาลัยสุโขทัยธรรมาธิราช
12. Partners We Worked With
Office of Strategy Management Upper
Northern Provincial Cluster 1
Ministry of Energy
Northern Illinois
University
National Broadcasting and
Telecommunications
Commission
Thailand Greenhouse Gas
Management Organization
Fraunhofer Institute
Thai Chamber of
Commerce
United Nation
Development Program
Federation of Thai
Industries Chiang Mai
Chapter
Committee of Experts for
Public Administration of
the United NationsNational Innovation
Agency
York UniversityThailand Research Fund
National Housing
Authority
Lee Kuan Yew School of
Public Policy
Higher Education
Commission of Thailand
Digital Economy
Promotion Agency
Asia-Pacific Public
Policy Network
Public Sector
Anti-Corruption
Commission
Chiang Mai Province Chiang Mai Municipality
13. ORA-ORN POOCHAROEN
Director
JAMEEKORN AMNAJPOOK
Program Coordinator
DR. WARATHIDA CHAIYAPA
Lecturers
ANGUNTHIP SRISUWAN
Faculty of Architecture,
Chiang Mai University
EKKACHAI MAHAEK
Faculty of Architecture,
Chiang Mai University
LEE KIAN CHENG
Faculty of Political Science and
Public Administration,
Chiang Mai University
PAIRACH PIBOONRUNGROJ
Director, Supply Chain Economic
Research Centre, Faculty of
Economics, Chiang Mai University
PITIPONG YODMONGKOL
Dean, College of Arts
Media & Technology,
Chiang Mai University
PRASIT WANGPAKAPATTANAWONG
Department of Biology,
Faculty of Science,
Chiang Mai University
CHARLES PHUA CHAO RONG
President, Association
for Public Affairs Singapore
KAMONPHORN KANCHANA
Faculty of Political Science and
Public Administration,
Chiang Mai University
MARTIN VENZKY- STALLING
Senior Adviser, Science and
Technology Park,
Chiang Mai University
PATAMAWADEE JONGRUCK
Faculty of Political Science and
Public Administration,
Chiang Mai University
POON THIENGBURANATHUM
Director, ECUP, School of Public
Policy, Chiang Mai University
RAM CHOTIKOOT
Faculty of Political Science and
Public Administration,
Chiang Mai University
CHAYA VADDHANAPHUTI
Department of Geography,
Faculty of Social Sciences,
Chiang Mai University
KARUNA RAKSAWIN
Faculty of Architecture,
Chiang Mai University
NAWIT ONGSAVANGCHAI
Faculty of Architecture,
Chiang Mai University
PENKARN KANJANARAT
Faculty of Pharmacy,
Chiang Mai University
PRANOM TANSUKANUN
Faculty of Architecture
Chiang Mai University
RATANAPORN AWIPHAN
Faculty of Pharmacy,
Chiang Mai University
CHIRAWAN CHAISUWAN
PhD Program Director, Faculty
of Business Administration,
Chiang Mai University
AKACHAI SANG-IN
MALINEE KHUMSUPA
Faculty of Political Science and
Public Administration,
Chiang Mai University
PANOM GUNAWONG
Director, Centre for Digital
Society, School of Public Policy,
Chiang Mai University
PONGTIP THIENGBURANATHUM
Research Fellow,
ECUP, School of Public Policy,
Chiang Mai University
PRUK AGGARANGSI
Director, Energy Research and
Development
Institute - Nakornping,
Chiang Mai University
DR. POBSOOK CHAMCHONG
Lecturers
DR. PIYAPOG BOOSSABONG
Lecturers
DR. WILLIAM P. KITTREDGE
Lecturers
CHIRADA NA SUWAN
Executive Manager
NIRATTIGORN SANGDEE
Creative Director
WACHIRA C. PANSUWAN
Finance and Accounting Officer
JIRAWAT KEAWKUN
Design Consultant
Our Management Members in 2018
Our Faculty and Affiliated Members in 2018
14. SIRIWUT BURANAPIN
Dean, Faculty of Business
Administration,
Chiang Mai University
WANNAPA LEERASIRI
SIDTHINAT PRABUDHANITISARN
TAWEE CHAIPIMONPLIN
Department of Geography,
Faculty of Social Sciences,
Chiang Mai University
WONGKOT WONGSAPAI
Department of Mechanical
Engineering,
Faculty of Engineering,
Chiang Mai University
UDOMCHOKE ASAWIMOLKIJ
YANIN CHIVAKIDAKARN HUYAKORN
Faculty of Social Sciences,
Chiang Mai University
SURAPIT PROMSIT
Director, MBA in Global Business
Management Program,
Thammasat Business School
WASAN PANYAGAEW
Head, Department of Sociology
and Anthropology,
Faculty of Social Sciences,
Chiang Mai University
Our Finances
การเงินและงบประมาณ
รายรับจริงประจำปีงบประมาณ พ.ศ.2561 ของสถาบันนโยบายสาธารณะ มหาวิทยาลัยเชียงใหม่ จำแนกตามประเภทที่มาของรายได้
ประเภทรายได้ งบประมาณเงินแผ่นดิน งบประมาณเงินรายได้ฯ รวมทั้งสิ้น
รายได้จากเงินอุดหนุนทั่วไป - 5,898,200.00 5,898,200.00
รายได้จากค่าธรรมเนียมการศึกษา - - -
รายได้จากการบริการวิชาการ - 66,140.00 66,140.00
รายได้/ผลประโยชน์อื่น - - -
- เงินบริจาค 4,000.00 4,000.00
- ดอกเบี้ยเงินฝากธนาคาร 126.40 126.40
เงินโอนจากมหาวิทยาลัย - - -
เงินเหลือจ่ายนำมาตั้งงบประมาณ - - -
รวม - 5,968,466.40 5,968,466.40
ผลการใช้จ่ายงบประมาณ ประจำปีงบประมาณ พ.ศ.2561 สถาบันนโยบายสาธารณะ มหาวิทยาลัยเชียงใหม่
จำแนกตามแผนงาน
แผนงานงบประมาณ งบประมาณเงินแผ่นดิน งบประมาณเงินรายได้ฯ
แผนการเรียนการสอน - -
แผนงานบริการวิชาการแก่สังคม - -
แผนงานบริหารมหาวิทยาลัย - 5,713,468.00
รวม - 5,713,468.00
จำแนกตามหมวดงบ
ประเภทงบ งบประมาณเงินแผ่นดิน งบประมาณเงินรายได้ฯ
งบบุคลากร - 2,193,200.00
งบดำเนินงาน - -
- เงินเหลื่อมปี 3,520,268.00
งบเงินอุดหนุน - -
งบลงทุน - -
งบรายจ่ายอื่น - -
รวม - 5,713,468.00