2. General Info
• Sacral fractures are common pelvic ring injuries (30-45%)
• Frequently missed
• 25% - Associated with neurologic injury
• A blow from behind, or a fall onto the ‘tail’
• Women > Men
• Young adults - high energy trauma
• Elderly - low energy falls
3. Anatomy
• Central role in the stability of both
the pelvis and the spinal column.
• Formed by fusion of 5 Sacral Vertebrae
• Fuses at 26 years
• Articulates with
5th Lumbar Vertebra Proximally
Coccyx Distally
Ilium Laterally At Sacroiliac Joints
• Contains 4 Foramina which transmit sacral nerves
• BIOMECHANICS - Transmission of load distributed by first
sacral segment through iliac wings to the acetabulum
4.
5. • Lumbo-pelvic stability is contributed by
– The complex of ligaments that invest the sacrum anteriorly
and posteriorly
– The ligaments of the pelvic floor
– The osseous structure of the sacrum and pelvis
– All these also help to prevent injury to the neurovascular
structures .
ANTERIORLY POSTERIORLY
6. Nerves
• L5 nerve root runs on top of sacral ala
• S1- S4 nerve roots (4 pairs) are transmitted through the
sacral foramina
– S1 and S2 nerve roots carry higher rate of injury
• Lower sacral nerve roots (S2-S5)
– Function
• Anal sphincter tone
• Voluntary contracture
• Bulbo-cavernosus reflex
• Peri-anal sensation
– Unilateral preservation of nerves
is adequate for bowel and bladder control
7. Traumatic “Far Out” Syndrome
• Compression and entrapment of the L5 nerve root in the
extra-foraminal area between the hypertrophied L5
transverse process
and the sacral ala.
• Radiculopathy
• Rx: Minimally invasive
decompressive surgery
8. Etiology
• High energy trauma - RTA
• Direct trauma
• Fall from height
• Insufficiency fracture ( Osteoporosis, Drug induced
osteopenia, Pelvic irradiation, Repetitive stress - Trivial
trauma)
• Pathological fracture.
• Isolated sacrum fracture – RARE
9. AO Classification Of Sacral Injuries
• Type A: Lower Sacro-coccygeal Injuries
– 3 subtypes (A1, A2, A3)
• Type B: Posterior Pelvic Injuries
– 3 subtypes (B1, B2, B3)
• Type C: Spino-pelvic Injuries
– 4 subtypes (C0, C1, C2, C3)
10.
11. Denis Classification
• Based on the fracture line orientation and location with
respect to the sacral foramina
• Zone 1: fracture involves the sacral ala lateral to the neural
foramina
• Zone 2: fracture involves the neural foramina, spinal canal
not involved
• Zone 3: fracture is medial to the neural foramen, involving
the spinal canal; these may be transverse or longitudinal
– Sub-classified into 4 types (Type 1,2,3 and 4)
13. • Zone 3 sub-classified into 4 types:
Roy-Camille, Strange-Vognsen and Lebech Sub-classification
– Type 1: Only kyphotic angulation at the fracture site (no
translation)
– Type 2: Kyphotic angulation with anterior translation of the
distal sacrum
– Type 3: Kyphotic angulation with complete offset of the
fracture fragments (cephalad and caudal sacrum)
– Type 4: Comminuted S1 segment, usually due to axial
compression
15. • Zone 1 fractures
– Fracture lateral to foramina
– Most common (50%)
– Nerve injury rare (5%) - usually
occurs to L5 nerve root
– Mostly - not affect pelvic stability
16. • Zone 2 fractures
– Fracture through foramina
– One third of all sacral fractures
– May be Stable or Unstable
– Zone 2 fracture with shear
component is highly unstable
– Unstable - higher risk of non-
union, poor functional outcome
– Neurologic deficit in 30%
17. • Zone 3 fractures
– Fracture medial to foramina into the spinal canal
– Highest rate of neurologic deficit (60%) -bowel, bladder,
and sexual dysfunction
– fracture lines are all medial to the sacral foramina and
enter the spinal canal,
but can run in a vertical,
oblique/ horizontal direction
– The least common 16%.
– Cauda equina syndrome
18. JUMPER’S FRACTURE : Transverse sacral fractures -
high energy, fall from height
onto lower extremities.
ZONE III FRACTURES
19. Isler classification
• Used for fractures that involve the lumbosacral articulation:
– Isler 1: fracture occurs lateral to the L5/S1 facet
– Isler 2: fractures line involves the L5/S1 facet
– Isler 3: fracture line extends medially to the L5/S1 facet
20. Presentation
• Peripelvic pain
• Slow antalgic gait
• Bruising and/or tenderness is elicited when the sacrum is
palpated from behind or per rectum.
• Test pelvic ring stability by internally and externally rotating
iliac wings
• Can have subcutaneous fluid mass indicative of lumbosacral
fascial degloving
(Morel-Lavallee lesion)
• Trendelenburg test (-)
• SLRT - normal
• FABER Test (+)
21. • Do Perform
– Primary assessment (ABCDE) First – ATLS Protocol
– Neurologic Examination - Saddle Anasthesia
– Genito-urinary and Gastrointestinal examination
• Vaginal Examination - to rule out open injury
• Rectal - Light touch and pinprick sensation
along S2-S5 dermatomes
- Perianal Wink
- Bulbo-cavernosus /Cremasteric Reflexes
– Vascular - Distal Pulses/ Ankle-brachial Index or
Angiogram
22. Imaging
X- RAY - Only show 30% of sacral fractures
- Effective screening tool for sacral fractures
- Often of poor quality
Recommended views
1.AP
2.Lateral - identifies the sacral ala slope (minimizes risk to
the L5 nerve root)
23. 3. Inlet view
- Determining anterior or posterior displacement of SI
joint/sacrum/iliac wing.
- Best assessment of sacral spinal canal and superior
view of S1
4. Outlet view
- Provides true AP of sacrum (optimal visualization of
the S1 neural foramina).
- Determination of vertical displacement of the
hemipelvis
- Subtle signs of pelvic disruption - slightly widened SI
joint, discontinuity of the sacral borders, nondisplaced
sacral fractures, or disruption of the sacral foramina.
25. Findings in Xrays
• Sacral fractures
• L4 or L5 transverse process fractures
• Asymmetric foramina
• Anterior pelvic ring disruptions
• Stepladder sign - seen on AP view
- Results from displacement with overriding of
transverse fracture fragments
- Indicates disruption of anterior sacral foramina and
lumbro-sacral facets
CT - Diagnostic study of choice (coronal and sagittal
reconstruction views)
26. • MRI
– When neural compromise is suspected
– Limited clinical utility owing to restricted access to a
critically injured patient
– Provide superior imaging of genitourinary and pelvic
vascular structures.
CT VIEWS MRI VIEWS
27. Treatment
• NONOPERATIVE - Progressive weight-bearing +/-
orthosis (Hip Spica casts, bracing, traction techniques)
• Indications
– Stable /minimally displaced
– <1 cm displacement
– No neurologic deficit
– Absence of soft tissue involvement
– Insufficiency fractures
• Weight bearing as tolerated for incomplete fractures
• Touch-toe weight bearing for complete fractures.
28. • Examples:
– Unilateral zones I and II fractures
– Anterior impaction fractures from lateral compression
mechanism
– Isolated sacral ala fractures.
• Most of the cases can be managed conservatively -
takes 8–12 weeks to heal.
29. Sacroplasty
• Non-surgical therapy used to ease pain from a
fractured sacrum due to osteoporosis (insufficiency
fractures) / pathological fractures
• Minimally invasive
• Injecting polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement
30. • OPERATIVE
Surgical fixation
– Indications
• Displaced fractures >1 cm
• Soft tissue compromise
• Persistent pain after non-operative management
• Displacement of fracture after non-operative
management
– Surgical fixation with decompression
• Any evidence of neurologic injury
31. Surgical Fixation
1. Percutaneous Screw Fixation
2. Posterior Tension Band Plating
3. Lumbopelvic Fixation
4. Transiliac Sacral Bars/Rods
5. Decompression Of Neural Elements
6. Triangular Osteosynthesis
32. Percutaneous Screw Fixation
• Screws may be placed as sacroiliac, trans-sacral or trans-
iliac
• Useful for sagittal plane fractures
• Technique
– Screws placed percutaneously under fluoroscopy
– Mostly at the level of S1-S2 segments
– Beware of L5 nerve root
– Avoid overcompression of fracture
– Screw placement posterior to the ICD ensures safe
screw placement (in non-dysmorphic sacrum)
– May result in loss of fixation or malreduction
– Does not allow for removal of loose bone fragments
– Do not use in osteoporotic bone
33. • Risk of anterior screw penetration causing neurologic injury
is much higher with anterosuperior sacral concavity.
• In low-energy fractures, sacral ala fracture - iliosacral screw
fixation, feasible in both the S1 and S2 corridor
ILIO-SACRAL
TRANS-SACRAL
34. Posterior Tension Band Plating
• Posterior two-incision approach
• Technique - May use in addition to ilio-sacral screws
• Allows direct visualization of fracture
• Wound healing complications high
ILIO-ILIAC PLATE
35. • Transverse sacral fractures
– If with severe kyphosis : manipulation and stabilization
done to prevent skin compromise and allow
decompression
– Sacral roots tented over extreme kyphosis
– Simple sacral laminectomy not effective
– Vigorous manipulation can cause rectal perforation
– Reduction is done with Cobb Elevator and Weber clamps
and maintained with plates.
36. Lumbo-Pelvic Fixation
• Posterior approach to lower lumbar spine and sacrum –
mainly for ‘U’ type sacral fracture
• Technique
– Pedicle screw fixation in lumbar spine
– Iliac screws parallel to the inclination angle of outer table
of Ilium
– Longitudinal and transverse rods
• Pros - Shown greatest stiffness when used for
an unstable fracture
- biomechanically robust
• Cons - Invasive
ILIO – LUMBAR FIXATION
38. Decompression Of Neural Elements
• The relief of tension/compression of neural structures
entrapped or under traction
• Technique
– Indirect - Reduction (open or closed) through axial
traction - restoring the patency of the neural foramina
– Direct - Posterior approach followed by laminectomy or
foraminotomy
foraminotomy
39. Triangular osteosynthesis
– Subcategory of Spino-pelvic fixation
– This technique offers mechanically better fixation for highly unstable,
vertical shear sacral alar fractures
– The use of a vertical fixation component represented by a lumbo-
pelvic construct (usually unilateral) using transiliac screws
– And a horizontal part represented by a sacroiliac screw/ sacral plate at
the height of the S1 vertebral body or S1 Pedicle Screw and S2 Alar
Iliac Screw
– Provide enhanced multi-planar stability of the LSCFU (the lumbo-
sacro-coccygeal functional unit).
– Smaller displacement & better stability than sacroiliac fixation alone
– Early mobilization of the patient may be achieved, with avoidance of
late deformity
– Can cause destruction of the L5-S1 joint, Need for additional removal
surgery, An increased risk of infection due to the large incision
41. Complications
• Venous thromboembolism- result of immobility
• Iatrogenic nerve injury-
– Overcompression of fracture
– Improper hardware placement
– lower extremity deficits
– Urinary , rectal, sexual dysfunction
• Chronic low back pain.
• Malreduction/Malunion.
– More common with vertically displaced fracture
42. Prognosis
• Fusion rates following sacral fractures after conservative
management have been reported to be 85–90%
• Presence of a neurologic deficit is the most important
factor in predicting outcome
• Displacement confers an increased risk of neurologic
dysfunction
• Mistreated fractures may result in complications
43. References
1. Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults Ninenth edition
2. Handbook of Fractures 6th Edition 2019 By Kenneth Egol,
Kenneth J. Koval & Joseph Zuckerman
3. Orthobullets : https://www.orthobullets.com/trauma/
1032/sacral-fractures