2. Sensor 1 Sensor 2 Sensor 1 Sensor 2 Sensor 1 Sensor 2 Sensor 1 Sensor 2 Sensor 1 Sensor 2 Sensor 1 Sensor 2
16,333 0 272,67 0 444,33 0 291,17 41,667 603,5 227,67 824,67 329,8
DATE
T=150°C - Conventional - WITHOUT (1000 Bar)
PEI
100,00% 100,00% 100,00% 85,69% 62,28% 60,00%
FLOW LENGTH MEASUREMENT AT DIFFERENT IMM PRESSURE IMM PRESSURE DROP AT ISO FLOW LENGTH
FORM
FOR-TEC-101 Rev.: A
Page 1 of 3
FLOW AND PRESSURE STUDY REPORT- SPIRAL MOLD
ROCTOOL TECHNOLOGY IMPROVEMENT VERSUS CONVENTIONAL TECHNOLOGY
TRADE NAME GRADE 1000
PICTURES OF INJECTED SAMPLES
TRIAL # HDP-17-011 MOLD Spiral 1 mm
MATERIAL
FAMILY
02/08/2017
500 1000 1500 Flow Length (cm) 2,5 5 7,5
290°C 187,3% 157,0% 141,5% 290°C -84,0% -79,3% _
Flow length improvement IMM Pressure improvement
T=290°C - RocTool - WITH (1000 Bar)
270°C
SUPPLIER SABIC
250°C 86,7% 67,6% -60,0% -65,3% _
115,3% 101,2% 89,0% 270°C -70,0% -69,3% _
Pressure (Bar)
Mold Pressure Avg
Pressure Drop (%)
PRESSURE DROP BETWEEN THE TWO PRESSURE SENSORS
CONVENTIONAL TECHNOLOGY (150°C) ROCTOOL TECHNOLOGY (290°C)
Pressure (Bar) 500 1000 1500 500 1000 1500
54,2% 250°C
Sensors
Sensor 1
Sensor 1
Sensor 2
3. Sensor 1 Sensor 2 Sensor 1 Sensor 2 Sensor 1 Sensor 2 Sensor 1 Sensor 2 Sensor 1 Sensor 2 Sensor 1 Sensor 2
366,5 125,83 738,83 360,33 1061 569,5 376,67 245,17 793,67 545,17 1079,2 761,17
ROCTOOL TECHNOLOGY (290°C)CONVENTIONAL TECHNOLOGY (150°C)
IMM PRESSURE DROP AT ISO FLOW LENGTH
Pressure Drop (%)
Mold Pressure Avg
31,31%
Sensors
Pressure (Bar) 500 1000 1500 500 1000
65,67% 51,23% 46,32% 34,91% 29,47%
1500
FLOW LENGTH MEASUREMENT AT DIFFERENT IMM PRESSURE
-40,4% -45,3%
Pressure (Bar)
PICTURES OF INJECTED SAMPLES
FORM
T=290°C - RocTool - WITH (1000 Bar)
MATERIAL
FAMILY PEI SABIC
TRADE NAME GRADE 1000
FOR-TEC-101 Rev.: A
Page 2 of 3
FLOW AND PRESSURE STUDY REPORT- SPIRAL MOLD
DATE 10/07/2017 TRIAL #
Flow Length (cm)
50,5%
10
T=150°C - Conventional - WITHOUT (1000 Bar)
42,1% 270°C
22,3% 250°C
HDP-17-011 MOLD Spiral 1.5 mm
SUPPLIER
ROCTOOL TECHNOLOGY IMPROVEMENT VERSUS CONVENTIONAL TECHNOLOGY
Flow length improvement IMM Pressure improvement
20
0,0%
0,0%290°C 89,9% 58,9% 52,9% 290°C
500 1000
19,9% 22,7%
55,9%
1500
-66,7% 0,0%270°C
-70,2% -71,7%
PRESSURE DROP BETWEEN THE TWO PRESSURE SENSORS
-51,9%
15
250°C
Sensor 1
Sensor 2
Sensor 1
Sensor 2
4. Pressure Drop between the 2 Sensors vs Mold Thickness at Injection
Pressure = 1000 Bars
Results Evaluations
The graph above shows a flow length for the two thicknesses
at two temperature (150°C and 290°C). By comparing these
curves, a significant reduction in thickness an be observed.
Also, the following diagram shows the pressure drop
measured between the two sensors for the two thicknesses at
1000 bars of injection pressure. The reduction of pressure
drop in the cavity is important up to 39%.
GLOBAL COMMENTS & RECOMMENDATIONS
temperature is 290°C regarding to the trials performed with this material. We obtain the longest flow with an important
reduction of the pressure drop compared to the conventional mold temperature.
Note : All the injection trials and the pressure measurements were carried out according to the protocol defined by RocTool (injection process, 2 heating sides,
cold sprue, mold design).
All pressure data are measured using eDart system (RJG).
FLOW AND PRESSURE STUDY REPORT- SPIRAL MOLD
DATE 10/07/2017 TRIAL # HDP-17-011 MOLD Spiral
FORM
FOR-TEC-101
Flow Length improvement vs Injection Pressure in function of Mold Temperature/Mold Thickness
MATERIAL
FAMILY PEI SUPPLIER SABIC
TRADE NAME GRADE 1000
Rev.: A
Page 3 of 3
150°C (1 mm)
150°C (1.5 mm)
