7 low emission energy sources sfc

Session 7. Low Emission
Energy Sources
Sustainable Logistics
Roadmap Training
26 October 2021

Session 7. Low Emission Energy Sources
Certification Manager Transport
Energy Saving Trust
Colin Smith
Sales and Marketing Director
Tevva Motors Limited
David Thackray
Sustainable Logistics Roadmap | S7 Low Emission Energy Sources
2

Only use training materials within your company
Terms and Conditions and Antitrust – Training
The following terms and
conditions apply to registration
for and participation in the Online
Training and/or E-Training (the
‘Training’) between Stichting
Smart Freight Centre (SFC) and
the Participant. By completing the
registration process for
participating in the Training you
confirm receipt of the terms and
conditions and applicability of
these terms and conditions.
 Confidential information: any
correspondence, documents, data
carried, information or materials
(including, without limitation, any
methodology and tools which may be
disclosed or demonstrated during the
Training) relating to the business,
activities or trade secrets of the other.
 Documentation: the written and / or
electronic documentation associated
and provided with the Training.
Intellectual Property Rights
 SFC has the sole entitlement to all
Intellectual Property Rights in and
related to the Training and all
Documentation developed for or made
available to the Participant during the
Training.
 Participant shall refrain from using or
copying and distributing Documentation
he/she has received during the
Training.
 Should Participant share
Documentation outside the group of
Participants to the Training access will
be blocked immediately.
Confidentiality
 SFC and the Participant must exercise
confidentiality in respect of all
Confidential Information used for the
Training and / or which is expressly
designated by them as confidential.
 The confidentiality obligation does not
apply to information that:
 is (or has become) part of the public
domain;
 has been lawfully obtained from a third
party who is not bound by a similar
obligation of confidentiality;
 has been independently obtained,
regardless of transfer of information
from the other party;
 has been released with permission of
the other party.
 The Confidential Information may not
be copied, recorded or reproduced
without the SFC’s prior written
consent.
All Participants should note
that NOTHING Smart Freight
Centre does shall have as its
object or effect the
PREVENTION, RESTRICTION
or DISTORTION of
COMPETITION. During the
training sessions the
following rules apply to ALL
participants:
 YOU CAN discuss in general
terms trends in prices, terms and
conditions, trade and market
conditions (In relation to freight
transport, logistics and supply
chain services).
 AVOID mentioning or sharing
information which relates or
reveals directly to actual prices,
terms and conditions,
commercial information and data
that may be advantageous to a
competitor, or (unless expressly
approved by the respective
Legal and/or Compliance
departments) discussing the
cross-licensing of any
technology.
 DO NOT discuss business
proposals with anyone without
first consulting legal counsel.
Arrange a separate meeting with
the person you want to discuss a
business proposal with.
 DO NOT make any agreement
or suggest to others that they
should boycott any individual
service or service provider.
 DO NOT discuss market
strategies, target customers,
product development, prices and
margins, costs of production and
supply
 AVOID getting into debates with
or making disparaging
comments about our
competitors, as they can easily
lead to a claim for unfair trade
practices.
3
Don’t share commercially sensitive information

Recap of
previous
session
SLR S6. Fleets and Asset Efficiency and Utilization
4
 Calculate and Report
 Setting Targets
 Procurement
 Solutions:
 Manage Demand
 Switch mode
 Utilize Fleets and Assets
 Efficiency of the Fleets
and Assets
 Switch energy carrier

Session 7: Low Emission Energy Sources
Objective: Determine what are
the available options for low
emission fuels and energy
sources and how to select them
for own and outsourced
operations
Content:
 Solutions for low emission fuels and
energy sources
 Company case: Tevva eTrucks
 Decision Making for shippers on low
emission energy sources
5
1. Getting Started
2. Calculate and report:
GLEC Framework
3. Vision, Goals and
Targets
4. Procurement
5. Solutions: Transport
Modes and Demand
6. Solutions: Fleet and
Assets Utilization and
Efficiency
7. Solutions: Low
Emission Energy
Sourcess
8. Carbon Offsetting and
Insetting and Finance
9. Resources and
Collaboration
10. Welcome day

Solutions for decarbonizing freight and logistics
6
Focus of today

Our Low Emissions and
Fuels Program
In partnership with
Sustainable Road Freight Conference | Smart Freight Centre
7
Solutions
Report
and
calculate
Decide
Implement
and
collaborate

Solutions for low emission fuels and energy
sources

Energy solutions
Energy
Solutions
Natural Gas Biofuels
Electric
Hydrogen
fuel cell
electric
E-fuels
9

What makes an energy source “low” or “zero” emission
10
Source: GLEC Framework 2.0 (2019)

Breakdown
of Upstream
Emissions
11
 Feedstock
matters
 Origin of
electricity
matters

Options for fuel and energy (current and future)
ENERGY
SOURCE
ROAD SEA/ WATERWAYS AIR RAIL LOGISTICS
SITES
Fossil fuel -
petroleum
based
 Diesel
 Gasoline
 Liquified petroleum gas (LPG)
 Heavy fuel oil
 Marine diesel oil (MDO)
 Kerosene  Diesel  Diesel
 Gasoline
 LPG
Fossil fuel -
natural gas
 Compressed natural gas (CNG)
 Liquified natural gas (LNG)
 LNG  LNG  CNG
 LNG
Biofuels  Biodiesel
 HVO (Hydrotreated vegetable
oil)
 Biomethane (Bio-CNG or LNG)
 Bioethanol
 Bio-MDO
 Bio-LNG
 Sustainable
aviation fuels
(SAF)
 Bio-LNG  Biodiesel
 HVO
 Biomethane
 Bioethanol
Electric  Electricity (plug-in hybrid
vehicles, battery electric)
 Electricity (battery electric
vessels)
 Electricity (small
applications)
 Electric  On site generation
 Green tariffs
Hydrogen  Hydrogen (combustion and fuel
cell electric vehicles)
 E-fuels
 Hydrogen (combustion and fuel
cell electric vehicles)
 E-fuels (incl ammonia)
Other  Wind
 Solar
 Solar
12
©

Your challenge
13
Operators
Shippers
Energy
Providers
Policymakers
Vehicle
Manufacturers
Natural
Gas
• CNG
• LNG
Biofuels
• HVO
• Biomethane
Electric
• Battery
• eHighways
Hydrogen
• Green
• Blue
• Grey
E-fuels
• Renewable
• Gas-to-
liquid
Challenge:
which way
to go?
 What is it?
 It’s already
happening
 Well-to-wheel
GHGs
 Pros and cons

What is it?
Natural gas - LNG and CNG
 Natural gas cooled to -162°C
(-260°F), changing it into a liquid that
is 1/600th of its original volume
 LNG ships/trucks require modified
engines and dedicated fuel tanks
 Otto cycle engine (spark/positive
ignition): cheaper but higher methane
leaks
 Diesel cycle engine (compression
ignition)
 Natural gas compressed to <1/100th
of its original volume
 CNG trucks require modified engines
and dedicated fuel tanks
 Compression-ignition dual fuel
technologies: comes with methane
leaks
 Spark-ignition engine technology + 3-
way catalyst: deals with methane
leaks, but lower efficiency
15
Compressed natural gas (CNG)
Liquefied natural gas (LNG)
Source: Chevron

Natural gas – LNG and CNG
It’s already happening
16
Source: Volkswagen, Volvo, TNM/Albert Heijn, News Atlas, Transportation News
Courtesy of Ewals CargoCare

Well-to-wheel GHGs
Natural gas – LNG and CNG
Extraction and
processing
Transportation
Storage and
dispensing at
refueling station
0
50
100
150
Diesel (Fossil
Diesel)
LNG (EU mix) CNG (EU piped mix)
Fossil Fuels
Variation in
Emissions
Source: JEC v5, gCO2e/MJ
Well to Tank
Tank to Wheel
Land use (from RED2)
17
CO2
CH4
~20% reduction

Pros and cons
Natural gas - LNG and CNG
 Lower costs
 High supply availability
 Potential reduction in local pollution
 Established fuel in ships
 Current IMO regulatory framework GHG
calcs favor LNG: only tank-to-wheel and
methane slip is not considered
 Insufficient reduction in GHG
emissions
 Still a fossil fuel
 WTW GHG reductions 0-20% compared
to petroleum diesel
 Methane slip (CH4) high emission
potent GHG
 Requires dedicated engines & tanks
(but costs offset by lower fuel costs)
 New fuel distribution infrastructure
needed
18
Pros Cons

What is it?
Biofuels
Biodiesel:
 Form of diesel fuel derived from
plants or animals
 1st generation: food and/or feed crops
 2nd generation: non-food-based crops or
waste oil feedstocks
 3rd generation: algae (in development)
Biomethane:
 biogas (CNG or LNG) produced by
microbiological process from different kinds
of biomass
 Wastewater, water treatment sludge, manure
from animal production, industrial or
municipal waste streams, energy crops
Biopropane:
 renewable liquid petroleum gas (LPG) and
by-product from HVO production >> drop-in
replacement fuel
Bioethanol:
 ethanol produced from biogenic feedstocks
(e.g. sugar cane, starch) >> blended with
conventional gasoline, e.g. E10 (10%
ethanol)
19
HVO - Hydrotreated
Vegetable Oil: chemically
same as diesel >> “drop-in”
fuel
FAME - Fatty Acid Methyl
Ester biodiesel:
“conventional” biofuel by
transesterification of
vegetable oil or animal
fats

Biofuels
20
Source: gcaptain, GoodFuels; Gaz Mobilité Suise and Carrefour; Airline Ratings

Well-to-wheel GHGs
Biofuels
Source of the
biofuel
Distance
biofuels
source to use
Efficiency
biofuels plant
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
rapeseed
sunflower seed
soybeans
palm oil
waste cooking oil
tallow oil
palm oil effluent
Variation in HVO Emission Factors
Source: JEC v5; gCO2e/MJ; WTW incl iLUC
Production at Source Transformation at source
Transport to market Transformation near market
Conditioning and distribution iLUC (from RED2)
21
Diesel
comparator
88% reduction

Pros and Cons
Biofuels
Pros
 Effective energy diversification and
GHG reductions
 Drop-in fuel:
 Existing infrastructure and vehicles
 Blends can help overcome cost
challenges
 Relevant option to meet IMO 2020
requirements for fuel Sulphur content
 Accelerated uptake and development
Cons
 Crop-based biofuels are not reducing
WTW emissions
 Costs are higher
 No air pollution advantages (PM, NOx)
 Large scale adoption limited
 Limited supply
 Competition with other end-uses
 Prioritize application where other solutions
are lacking, e.g. aviation, long-distance
trucking
 Other sustainability issues:
 Land-use change,
 Competition with food crops
22

Quick Poll:
For what mode do you see a role
for biofuels in 2030?
 Air
 Road
 Rail
 Maritime
 Inland waterways
(multiple options)
23 Sustainable Logistics Roadmap | S4 Low Emission Energy Sources

Electric vehicles and vessels
What is it?
Hybrid electric vehicles:
• Internal combustion engine (ICE) +
• An electric motor (battery charged by ICE
and/or regenerative braking)
Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles
(PHEV):
• Electric motor (battery charged by wall outlet,
charging station, ICE, regenerative braking)
and
• An ICE used only when battery is depleted
Battery electric vehicles (or vessels)
(BEV):
• Full electric vehicles with rechargeable
batteries and no ICE
Electric Road System (ERS):
• Battery electric vehicle can draw power from
wired network e.g. catenary lines
24

25
Sources: Calstart Zero-Emission Technology Inventory, IEA, Scania, Clean Technica, Greenbiz, Siemens, Electrive, Heineken

It’s started to happen
Electric road vehicles
26

It’s starting to happen
Electric vehicles and vessels…and planes!
27
Sources: Calstart Zero-Emission Technology Inventory, IEA, Scania, Clean Technica, Greenbiz, Siemens, Electrive, Heineken

Well-to-wheel GHGs
Fossil fuels
Renewable
energy
Nuclear 0
50
100
150
EU mix, 2016 EU mix, 2030 Farmed wood
IGCC
Municipal
waste; CCGT
Wind / solar /
hydro
Variation in Emissions
Source: JEC v5, gCO2e/MJ Well to Tank
Tank to Wheel
28
Diesel comparator

Pros and cons
Pros
 Competitive TCO for road
 Reduction in GHG emissions
 Improving with green power supply
 Well suited to urban hub-and-spoke
 Easily integrated in logistics fleets
with back to base operations
 Full control over investment
decisions
 Vehicles, chargers, power supply all in one
Cons
 Higher capital investment costs
 Constraint for carriers
 Requires investments in vehicles and
charging infrastructure
 Vehicle supply volume
 Challenges for Heavy Duty long-
distance trucks
 Need to adjust energy grid connections
 In particular for large fleet
 Uncertainties:
 Rapidly development technology
 Policy, residual value of asset,
 Battery life-cycle impacts
29

What is it?
Hydrogen
Hydrogen is an “energy carrier”
 Grey: Steam methane reformation (SMR),
without carbon capture and storage (CCS)
 Blue: SMR with CCS
 Green: Electrolysis of water using renewable
electricity
Different forms:
 Gaseous: H2
 Synthetic (e.g. methanol, ammonia)
Applications
 Fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEV)
 Still have batteries
 Conventional ICE vehicles
30

Hydrogen
It’s almost happening
31
Sources: Hydrogen Council Europe, Waterstofmagazine, Toyota

Well-to-wheel GHGs
Hydrogen
Losses during
production,
transport,
distribution and use
Source of the
methane in SMR
Effectiveness of
carbon capture and
storage (CCS)
Means of electricity
generation
0
50
100
150
eHydrogen (Natural
Gas)
EU 2016 Electricity
Mix
EU 2030 Electricity
Mix
Wind Electricity eHydrogen (Farmed
Wood)
eHydrogen
Variation in Emissions
Source: JEC v5, gCO2e/MJ
Well to Tank Tank to Wheel
32
Diesel comparator

Pros and cons
Hydrogen
Pros
 Flexibility
 Hydrogen can be produced from fossil and
renewable energy sources
 Longer distance & heavy duty application
 Geopolitical: Future for fossil fuels
 if combined with CCS (“blue hydrogen”)
 If produced with renewable energy sources
(“green hydrogen”)
 No tailpipe GHGs and air pollution
Cons
 Vast majority (95%) of hydrogen is
‘grey’
 High energy losses ~70%
 Costs are high and uses still low
 Requires investments in vehicles and
infrastructure
 Lack of supply of vehicles and
infrastructure:
 Still in development phase
 Ammonia production using hydrogen
is energy intensive
33

Others: e-fuels or synfuels
Gaseous or liquid fuels
generated from additional
renewable electricity for use in
internal combustion engines
Other names:
 Electrofuels or Synthetic fuels
 Advanced liquid fuels
 Power-to-X (X = gas or liquid)
Questions about cost and energy
effectiveness
 Very little publicly available that is
comparable across fuel providers
 Emerging solution for aviation
34

Others: e-fuels or synfuels
35
Maersk Secures Green e-Methanol for First Vessel
Operating on Carbon Neutral Fuel
More than half of Maersk’s 200 largest customers have set—or are in the
process of setting—carbon targets for their supply chains. As part of Maersk’s
ongoing collaboration with customers, corporate sustainability leaders
including Amazon, Disney, H&M Group, HP Inc., Levi Strauss & Co.,
Microsoft, Novo Nordisk, The Procter and Gamble Company, PUMA,
Schneider Electric, Signify, Syngenta and Unilever have committed to use and
scale zero carbon solutions for their ocean transport, with many more
expected to follow.

Efficiency of
energy used
36
 Hydrogen
requires 2-3x
the energy
consumed
 eFuels require
3-4x the energy
consumed
Sources: Transport & Environment

Wildcard: wind-powered ships
37
Source: Maritime Executive, Groene Zaken

Q&A
Would you go
for hydrogen
or electric in
2030 for your
road freight?
 Hydrogen
 Electric
38
?

Q&A
39

DEPLOYING ELECTRIC MEDIUM DUTY
TRUCKS IN THE REAL WORLD

26/10/2021 42
TEVVA’S TECHNOLOGY ON THE ROAD TODAY
 State of the art e-machines.
 High energy efficiency, reliability, safety.
 No rare earth metals mean e-motor is more
sustainable and lower cost than alternatives.
 E-machines are 100% recyclable at end of life.
 Regenerative braking produces up to 30% of
battery electric charge each day.
02
 Typical 180 mile all electric, zero emission
range.
 Rapid charge capability enables
redeployment in 1 hour.
 High voltage electrical energy storage and
distribution management system.
BATTERY/BATTERY
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (‘BMS’)
03
 Range Extender (generator) removes range
anxiety.
 ReX operates at constant charging output more
than doubling the vehicle’s daily energy capacity
and range.
 PREMS1 ensures that ReX operates for the
absolute minimum period daily to maximise use
of the cheapest energy and minimise TOC.
RANGE EXTENDER (‘ReX’)
04
 PREMS: Patented cloud-based software
that optimises use of ReX.
 VCU: gateway with vehicle communication
network enabling autonomous control
telematics system for fleet management and
diagnostic analysis.
EMBEDDED CONTROL
SYSTEMS
1. PREMS – Predictive Range Extender Management System (patent granted software)
01
E-MOTOR/GENERATOR

26/10/2021 43
UPS BIRMINGHAM LAUNCH SUMMER 2019
Page 43
10 Vehicles in Birmingham
5 Vehicles in Southampton
Since mid - 2019
>260,000km accumulated to date
c. 120 tonnes CO2 eliminated

26/10/2021 44
UPS – LUKE WAKE VP OF FLEET MAINTENANCE & ENGINEERING - DELIVERY
EQUIPMENT

26/10/2021 45
HOW MUCH BATTERY IS NEEDED TO BE CERTAIN OF 160 KM RANGE?
Battery Size needed to give a 7.5t GVW truck a 160 km range
Influences on actual range achieved
Fleet manager’s view
of min. ‘safe’ battery
capacity
kWh
Needed
Consumption
in
kWh
55
63
95
120 110 87 67
wind, surface water, temperature
Driver behaviour, load, highway vs. urban,
133
Fleet manager’s ‘safe’ battery size is 150% of what will be
needed on most days and DOUBLE what will be needed
on a good summer day
0.83
kWh/km
Add 25% battery
capacity for 12t GVW
requirement

26/10/2021 46
H2 REX – SPLIT AND UTILISATION OF ENERGY MIX
(7.5T VEHICLE ASSUMED)
80kWh grid-charged electricity
€0.14 /kWh (€11.20)
11kg / kWh (880kg)
65-130 miles range
120kWh stored as 7.5kg of Hydrogen
€0.28 /kWh (€33.50)
3kg / kWh (c.360kg including fuel cell and tanks)
98-195 miles additional range
‘Base load energy - typically, fully
consumed, every day
Back-up energy daily consumption can be from
zero to 100%
PREMS keeps this to the minimum to optimise
daily operating cost
€23,000
Capex
€35,000
Capex

26/10/2021 47
ECONOMICS – CALCULATING TCO FOR YOUR OPERATION
TCO will be driven by for primary factors
Vehicle capex
‘Fuel’ Costs
Maintenance costs
Utilisation level
Residual value
Based on an anticipated €120,000 net capex and a 7-year lease (1+83 rentals):
Monthly rentals will be ‘in the order of’ €1850 (ambient) €2250 (temperature-controlled)
= APPROXIMATELY €500 higher than a diesel
For an 12T truck, in 2021, this means:
 Capex – c. €140,000 (before any grants applied)
 Diesel: c. €1.14/litre / Electricity: c. €0.14/kWh
 Maintenance - “significantly lower”
 Residual value - unclear
Complexity of the above can be largely eliminated by moving to an operating lease
(contract hire) financial model as maintenance costs and RV are fixed at the outset

26/10/2021 48
ECONOMICS – CALCULATING TCO FOR YOUR OPERATION (ii)
Page 48
The UPS ‘base vehicle’ consumed 21 litres/ 100km – equating to c. €0.24/km (based on €1.14/litre)
EV cost per km is between €0.09 and €0.04 – depending (primarily) on driver behaviour and temperature
Saving per km is therefore between €0.20 and €0.15
To offset a €500 per month increase in monthly rental
3350km per month @ €0.15 per km
2500km per month @ €0.20 per km
To simplify: somewhere between €620 and €850 per month of diesel spend implies an
opportunity to save cost by switching to electric
Alternatively – just focusing on diesel spend (because diesel doesn’t only fuel ‘mileage’)
3350 km typically equates to approx. 750 litres or €840 monthly spend
2500 km typically equates to approx. 550 litres or €630 monthly spend

26/10/2021 49
DEFINING SUSTAINABILITY: BATTERY CHEMISTRY
Several Different Chemistries – Each Offering a Trade-Off
Lithium Cobalt Oxide(LiCoO2) — LCO
Lithium Manganese Oxide (LiMn2O4) — LMO
Lithium Nickel Manganese Cobalt Oxide (LiNiMnCoO2) — NMC
Lithium Nickel Cobalt Aluminum Oxide (LiNiCoAlO2) — NCA
Lithium Titanate (Li2TiO3) — LTO
Tevva batteries are:
Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4) — LFP
LiFePO4
Low Cost
Extreme Longevity
Excellent Thermal Stability
COBALT-FREE
Bulky (low energy density)
Heavy (ish)







26/10/2021 50
DEFINING SUSTAINABILITY:
REAL CARBON FOOTPRINT – UK EXAMPLE
Page 50
Inevitably depends on the CO2 per kWh of
electricity generated in any country
Grid electricity = 282g CO2 / kWh
(inc. WTT contribution of 27g / kWh)
Diesel = 3,170g CO2 / kWh
(inc. WTT contribution of 630g / kWh)
CO2 per tonne-kilometre
Diesel 130g
EV 36g
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-medium-duty-truck-low-hanging-
fruit-transport-david-thackray/

26/10/2021 51
BRAND ATTRIBUTES AND BRAND VALUES
Appendices:
Not for presentation
Q&A purposes only
(if needed)

www.tevva.com
WHY EREV IS PREFERRED OVER BEV
BEV range is not constant, it varies with
Temperature
Driver behavior
Traffic patterns
Ancillary loads (refrigeration, hydraulics)
Greater than 2:1 variance from max to
min
Consequences
100 mile duty needs a 250 mile battery
£230 per kWh (approx. at 2019 prices)
11kgs per kWh
For an 12T truck, this means:
 £28k additional battery
 1320kg lost payload
 Capex per tonne of payload – c.60% higher

26/10/2021 53
ONE DRIVETRAIN – TWO DRIVERS
David Thackray, Sales Director at Tevva
Tevva 7500kg gvw
0.39 kWh per kilometre
UPS Driver, 100 drops per day
Tevva 7500kg gvw
0.79 kWh per kilometre

26/10/2021 54
ELECTRIC TRUCKS
FOR THE REAL WORLD
Thank you
David Thackray
Sales and Marketing Director, Tevva
david.thackray@tevva.com

How to
decide which
solution
works in
your case?
?
Infra-
structure?
Vehicle
supply?
Legal?
Costs?
Emissions?
Availability
of fuel?
Range and
payload?
A myriad of
solutions
exists
56

LEFV Decision Making Template
Determine in three steps the potential solutions:
57
Applicability
Step 1. Determine
Applicability of
LEFV solutions to
your use case
Availability
Step 2. Determine
Availability of LEFV
solutions in your
market
Feasibility
Step 3. Determine
Feasibility of the
LEFV solutions in
cost and emissions

Step 1. Determine applicable LEFV solutions
Questions of step 1
Determine
1. What is the
timeframe?
2. What is the
operating
range?
3. Which fuels
to include?
Select
applicable
LEFV
solutions
58

Output shows the Low emission fuel solutions in a particular year (evolvement of technology);
Final categories and chosen solution to be made by each company.
Step 1. Determine applicable LEFV solutions
2025 concept (example only) 2030 answer (example only)
59
Source: Example derived
from Unilever
Urban
100-300
km
300-500
km
500-
1000km
1000km+
1-[0T – 1.3T] Electric Electric Biofuel Biofuel Intermodal
2-[1.3T – 3.5T] Electric Electric Biofuel Biofuel Intermodal
3-[3.5T – 7.5T] Electric Electric Biofuel Biofuel Intermodal
4-[7.5T – 12T] Electric Electric Biofuel Biofuel Intermodal
5-[12T – 17.5T] Biofuel Biofuel Biofuel Biofuel Intermodal
6-[17.5T – 26T] Biofuel Biofuel Biofuel Biofuel Intermodal
7-[26T+] Biofuel Biofuel Biofuel Biofuel Intermodal
Urban
100-300
km
300-500
km
500-
1000km
1000km+
1-[0T – 1.3T] Electric Electric Electric
Electric/
Hydrogen
Intermodal
2-[1.3T – 3.5T] Electric Electric Electric
Electric/
Hydrogen
Intermodal
3-[3.5T – 7.5T] Electric Electric Electric
Electric/
Hydrogen
Intermodal
4-[7.5T – 12T] Electric Electric Electric
Electric/
Hydrogen
Intermodal
5-[12T – 17.5T] Electric Electric Electric
Electric/
Hydrogen
Intermodal
6-[17.5T – 26T] Electric Electric
Electric/
Hydrogen
Electric/
Hydrogen
Intermodal
7-[26T+] Electric Electric
Electric/
Hydrogen
Electric/
Hydrogen
Intermodal

Step 2. Determine available LEFV solutions
Questions
Determine
What are the
locations of your
operation?
What vehicles are
available in the
market?
What fuel
infrastructure is
available?
What legal
requirements may
limit LEFV solutions?
Select
available
LEFV
solutions
60

Output: Which vehicles and infrastructure are available
Guidance: Legal considerations, reliability, etc.
Step 2. Determine available LEFV solutions
Vehicles Infrastructure
61
Source: Global Commercial Drive To Zero Program (globaldrivetozero.org)
Source: Véhicules et Avitaillement | Kit Environnement (terre-tlf.fr)

Step 3. Determine feasible LEFV solutions
Questions
Determine
what is
feasible?
1. What is your
investment cost?
2. What are the
operational cost?
3. What GHG
abatement costs
are included?
Total cost
of
ownership
(TCO)
Total
emissions
of
ownership
(TEO)
62

Output: Calculations based on the anticipated usage of total emissions and cost of ownership
Step 3. Determine feasible LEFV solutions
Total Emissions of Ownership
(TEO)
Total Cost of Ownership
(TCO)
63
Source: Example of FM Logistic, Mobility Comparator
kg
CO2e

Summary
Applicability
• Overview of
technical feasibility
• Indicative answer of
preferred solution
per use case
Availability
• Fuel and
infrastructure
availability
• Vehicle availability
• Legal/Policy options
Feasibility
• Guidance on TEO
calculations
• Reference to TCO
guidance
• Excel template for
calculations
64
Product 1.
LEFV Decision
Making Framework
Product 2.
LEFV Decision
MakingMatrix

Questions
65

What are you trying to influence as a shipper?
Vehicle/assets and fuel/energy
combination that you or your
carriers use in service delivery
1. Own assets
2. Exclusive use of assets
3. Chartered vessels/fleets
4. High volume and direct (and
long-term) contracts
5. Collaboration
Sustainable Logistics Roadmap Session 4: Procurement
67

How to incorporate your influence in
your procurement?
Does your company
have published
emission targets?
Are their internal
KPIs linked to GHG
emissions?
Is decarbonization
efforts part of your
procurement?
Is the footprint
measured?
Can relevant details
be shared with you
as a customer?
What is your emission
intensity?
Are you implementing
low emission fuels?
Are you using
renewable energy for
your Distribution
Centers?
What is your emission
reduction strategy?
Assess supplier’s
logistics
 GHG emission calculation
capabilities
 GHG goals and targets
and translation into
internal KPIs
 Vehicle/assets and
fuel/energy combination
that you or your carriers
use in service delivery
 GHG decarbonization
efforts across modes and
logistics sites
68
Details:
Smart Freight
Procurement
Questionnaire

What are you trying to influence as a shipper?
Assess
supplier’s
logistics
GHG
decarbonizati
on efforts
across
modes and
logistics sites
All modes
 Is your company able to provide
transport solutions that make use of
alternative or low emission fuels
 Please specify the alternative
transport solutions your company can
offer for the requested business
including a pre-shipment GHG
emissions analysis
Road freight
 Is your company using specific
measures and technologies to reduce
its road freight related GHG
emissions?
 Please list the measures in place to
reduce your company’s road freight
GHG emission that are applicable for
our business.
Logistics sites
 Does your company’s sustainability
strategy include general energy
reduction plans and a shift towards
renewable energy sources for your
logistics sites?
 Please indicate the % of renewable
energy that is used in the logistics
sites which will be included in the
tendered business.
Office buildings
 Does your company’s sustainability
strategy include general energy
reduction plans and a shift towards
renewable energy sources for your
office buildings?
 Please share your company's plans
for a general energy reduction and
shift towards renewable energy
sources for your office buildings.
69

Recap of
today
71
Additional reading
about today’s
subject?
 Introduction Report
Low Emission Fuels
 Beach head model
(Calstart)
 Low Emission Freight
and Logistics Trials
Report (TRL)

SLR S6. Fleets and Asset Efficiency and Utilization
Continue building up your
own Road Map
 Sustainable Logistics Roadmap
Worksheet
 Sustainable Logistics Roadmap
Template
You can continue reviewing the
solution areas
Details on the TalentLMS
72

Key information all shippers should now (background
reading)
 Fundamentals of low emission fuels
and energy sources
 Overview of the current landscape
 Industry experience and perspectives
 Total Emissions of Ownership (TEO)
concept
 Variation in Low Emission Fuels
73

Next session: Carbon Insetting, Offsetting and Financing
We invite you to:
 Building upon the targets you would set
for your supply chain. Identify relevant
solutions you would implement.
 How would you adjust your procurement
strategy to implement these solutions?
 Identify the modes you are using now
and what is needed to shift to more
sustainable options
Prework (Recommended):
 Watch Kühne Logistics University
video Module G
 Read Carbon Insets for the Logistics
Sector
1. Getting Started
2. Calculate and report:
GLEC Framework
3. Vision, Goals and
Targets
4. Procurement
5. Solutions: Transport
Modes and Demand
6. Solutions: Fleet and
Assets Utilization and
Efficiency
7. Solutions: Low
Emission Fuels
8. Carbon Offsetting
and Insetting and
Finance
9. Resources and
Collaboration
10. Welcome day
74

Join our journey towards
efficient and zero-emissions
global freight and logistics
Thank you!
If you have further questions, reach
out to:
Raluca Voinea
raluca.voinea@smartfreightcentre.org
Rik Arends
rik.arends@smartfreightcentre.org

7 low emission energy sources sfc

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to 7 low emission energy sources sfc

Similar to 7 low emission energy sources sfc (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

7 low emission energy sources sfc

Editor's Notes