1. 6/30/2018 1
Can the electromagnetic field including
radio field cause cancer?
2. The electromagnetic field is an
element of nature and has always
existed in the Earth's
environment. Electromagnetic
energy is a natural form of energy
composed of connected electric
and magnetic fields that
propagate or travel through a
medium or empty space.
3. The electromagnetic field can be divided into:
• ionizing
• non-ionizing
In contrast to ionizing radiation (gamma rays emitted by radioactive
materials, cosmic rays and X-rays) existing in the upper sphere of the
electro-magnetic spectrum, non-ionizing radiation is too weak to
overcome the forces binding molecules in cells and therefore can not
lead to ionization.
The radio field produced by radio communication devices such as
mobile telephony is part of the non-ionizing electromagnetic field..
4. Influence of the electromagnetic field on the human
body and its cells depends mainly on the field
frequency, its size or intensity. At low frequencies,
the electromagnetic field passes through the body,
while at radio frequencies it is partially absorbed
and penetrates into the body at a small depth. The
energy of this field is absorbed and processed into
the movement of molecules.
5. The level and type of signals used
in cellular networks is similar to
those for radio and TV broadcast,
broadcasted from about 100
years and over 50 years,
respectively. There was also no
threat to the health of people
living near broadcasting towers
of the radio or television, and
similar research also concerned
cellular networks.
6. The subject of the influence of electromagnetic
radiation on human health was taken, among
others through the World Health Organization
(WHO), the International Agency for Research on
Cancer (IARC), the Scientific Committee on
Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks of the
European Commission (SCENIHR), the Commission
on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP).
7. Positions and opinions expressed by this institutions indicated that,
given the current state of knowledge about the impact of
electromagnetic field on living organisms, it can not be unequivocally
stated that elektromagnetic field is harmful, as well as unequivocally
state that it is harmless. The low frequency electromagnetic field was
in 2002 classified by the WHO operating within the framework of the
WHO the International Agency for Research on Cancer, probably
presumably cantharenic for humans, i.e. those for whom there is
limited evidence of carcinogenicity people in the absence of sufficient
evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals, and therefore
"probably carcinogenic" to humans, as well as pickled vegetables.
8. According to the assessment of the International Agency for Research on Cancer
(IARC), no evidence was found for the relationship between exposure to radio
frequency electromagnetic fields and the risk of cancer types such as leukemia,
lymphoma, breast cancer or testicular cancer. Importantly, the IARC classification
process is based on the strength of evidence confirming the threat and not on the
magnitude of the potential risk. In the case of mobile phones, the IARC working
group concluded that there is evidence from studies on humans and animals that
radio signals from cordless telephones may increase the incidence of brain cancer.
However, there was no evidence of an increase in trends in the field of new
products. There are, therefore, some signs of a threat, but there is no certainty
about evidence. The classification was based on evidence related to non-wired
telephones. In the case of wireless exposures, the evidence was weaker or in IARC
terminology "unclassified";
9. Information sheet of the World Health Organization
'Electromagnetic fields and public health: mobile phones'
presents a summary of research into the effects of radio
frequency electromagnetic fields on brain activity, cognitive
functions, sleep, heart rate and blood pressure in volunteers.
To date, studies have not shown any coherent evidence of
negative health effects resulting from exposure to these
electromagnetic fields at levels below those that cause tissue
heating. Furthermore, the studies were unable to show a
causal relationship between electromagnetic field exposure
and reported symptoms or "electromagnetic hypersensitivity"
IARC "unclassified";
10. The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP)
concluded in its assessment (2011) based on epidemiological studies and on
animals that an increase in the risk of cancer in adults is unlikely within 10-15 years
of first use of mobile phones . At the time of the evaluation there were no data on
childhood tumors and periods over 15 years;
11. The Scientific Committee on the Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks of the
European Commission (SCENIHR) concluded in its opinion that general
epidemiological studies on the use of mobile phones did not show an increased risk
of brain tumors. Some studies have suggested an increased risk of glioblastoma and
auditory nerve, but the results of cohort studies and trends during morbidity have
not confirmed an increased risk for glioma, and the possibility of association with
acoustic neuroma remains open. According to the SCENIHR, there is no evidence of
an increased risk for other types of cancer in adults and children;
12. The British advisory group on non-ionizing radiation (AGNIR) in its 2012 report
indicated that although a significant number of studies in the field of
electromagnetic field health have been carried out, there is no convincing evidence
that exposures in the RF field below the accepted limits they cause health effects in
adults or children. These limits are in line with INCIRP, which is already the basis for
public health in the United Kingdom and many other countries.
13. The Swedish Radiation Safety Authority (SSM) in its 2015 report indicates that
there is no convincing evidence of brain cancer or any other adverse health effects
caused by electromagnetic fields from mobile phones.
14. Radio field
The German Commission for Radiological Protection (SSK) concluded in its
assessment that there is insufficient evidence for a link between cancer risk and
exposure to mobile communication. The German Federal Office for Radiation
Protection stated on the basis of epidemiological studies on the use of mobile
phones that adults do not have an increased risk of cancer.
15. According to the latest results, more than a decade of research by scientists led by
the US National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, published at the
beginning of February 2018, there is no link between cellular telephony and rodent
morbidity for glioblastoma and neuroblastoma. In parallel to the publication of
these research results, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a
report based on the results of these and other studies, which concludes that "no
sufficient evidence has been found that there is a detrimental effect on human
health, caused by exposures lower than those allowed by standards for radio
frequency electromagnetic fields.