Trump is not dead; the Eternal return of puritanism
#Trump #american-puritanism #puritanism #puritan
https://bittube.tv/post/e9447caa-a07d-4cde-815f-d3eab8e7deef
https://odysee.com/@periodic-reset-of-civilizations:c/Trump-is-not-dead--the-eternal-return-of-puritanism:8
https://tube.midov.pl/w/gMgWi5JoCjtnLD7AAkBxsm
https://www.bitchute.com/video/aD4MWKxiRxNR/
All the platforms I Am on:
https://steemit.com/links/@resetciviliz/link-s
▶ BITCOIN
34c3XCeSyoi9DPRks867KL7GVD7tGVcxnH
▶ ETHEREUM
0xAc1FBaEBaCc83D332494B55123F5493a113cE457
▶ TEESPRING
https://periodic-reset.creator-spring.com
Trump is not dead; the eternal return of puritanism
1. Trump is not dead; the Eternal return of puritanism.
2. TITLE OF THIS ARTICLE could be summarized:
THE PURITAN ORIGINS OF AMERICAN PATRIOTISM.
There is something deeply irritating in religious; it is this
notion of 'purity'; of an original 'lost paradise'.
Which obviously never existed.
3. From A Curmudgeon's Garden of Love : Romance, Sex and
Love's Myriad Delusions - 1,000 Irreverent Quotations,
Anecdotes, and Interviews by Jon Winokur:
“Henry Louis Mencken unflinchingly battled the
fundamentalism and Puritanism of his day, and he was the
scourge of the AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS, WHICH HE
LABELED THE "BOOBOISIE."”
4. From A Free Church, a Holy Nation: Abraham Kuyper's
American Public Theology by John Bolt:
“THE PUBLIC SQUARE WAS TO BE NAKED BY
DESIGN, liberated from the tyranny of oppressive (i.e.,
Protestant, Puritan) religion.
No longer would the village atheist or practitioner of any
religion other than Christianity need to feel publicly
uncomfortable.
Religious practice was to be relegated to the private, personal
sphere where it belonged.”
5. THIS IS THE WAY A SOCIETY SHOULD WORK. A
PUBLIC SPHERE AND A PURELY 'PRIVATE' SPHERE,
NOWADAYS EVERYTHING IS MIXED.
And these idiots of the 'new generations' don't understand
'what's wrong with it'.
And as these idiots born since the 2000s have no political
culture, they give even more weapons to the States, asking
them to take care of them more and more.
IN THE END, WE HAVE TOTALITARIAN STATES LIKE
THOSE OF COMMUNISM OR NAZISM IN THE 20TH
CENTURY.
6. Except that there is no longer any real physical violence,
but that the violence is carried out on the mental level only.
We saw it with the covid, and the all power of the State in
the West, which literally locked us up for months.
7. For those who HAVE 'NO POLITICAL CULTURE';
- It's totalitarianism.
And there's rally no point in ranting about Communist
China when you live in the West, which 'has much the
same way of operating'.
My gosh, those millennials and the ones who came after, are
going to fuck us up with their Socialist ideal.
8. From First Founders: American Puritans and Puritanism in an
Atlantic World (New England in the World) by Francis J.
Bremer:
“The thread that pulls together the stories that I have chosen
to tell is the narrative of how puritans sought to shape a
GODLY KINGDOM in America.”
GODLY KINGDOM?
Dah!
“This is partially intentional, to trace how some men and
women shaped their personal lives, while looking at how other
dedicated puritans sought to create GODLY
COMMUNITIES.”
GODLY COMMUNITIES?
Dah!
9. It seems that the religious exports itself 'very badly', this
animal has the tendency 'to repeat the same bullshit'.
10. “Puritans were dedicated TO RAISING THE KINGDOM OF
GOD.”
RAISING THE KINGDOM OF GOD?
Dah!
“Having transformed oneself into a “SHINING LIGHT,” the
puritan sought to bring others into the kingdom by persuasion
and the example of a godly life.”
The religious IS TOTALLY DELUSIONAL.
11. “One of the challenges faced by the first colonists was how to
determine the precise nature of A GODLY ORDER AND HOW
TO DISCERN BETWEEN FREE DISCUSSION THAT
PROMOTED THEIR GOAL AND IDEAS THAT
THREATENED IT.”
This is the religious person's idea of freedom; you have
the right to think what you want, but it must not go against
my ideas.
12. From The Puritan Origins of American Patriotism by George
McKenna:
“When the chips are down, when the stakes are high, American
political leaders go back to the narrative and even the
language of the Puritans; they do it then, especially, because
that is when Americans especially want to hear it. They start
talking about grace and consecration and sanctification,
language found nowhere in the Constitution or even the
Declaration of Independence. It is biblical, prophetic language,
the language of sermons and jeremiads. It reappears each time
the nation needs to gird its loins, concentrate its mind, and
throw itself against whatever threatens its life: a foreign foe, a
domestic rebellion, a Great Depression, a conspiracy of terror.
After the crisis has passed, ‘‘normalcy’’ eventually returns, and
Americans may even become a little embarrassed by what they
13. had solemnly pronounced only a short time earlier. But the
old Puritan language will reappear with the next crisis.”
BASICALLY YES. And that's what I find repugnant about
'Christianism', and what takes it away from the way of the
Antiquity: 'which sought reason'.
Which made them strong nations.
14. “Alexis de Tocqueville worried about the tendency of
MODERN DEMOCRACY toward a kind of COLLECTIVE
AMNESIA.”
For those who have not read it, I advise you to read
Tocqueville. You will understand better the modern
democracies.
And why we have episodes like the Covid, and its 'religious
collective Treatment'.
15. “Despite sometimes fierce resistance from Catholics and
midwesterners, by the outset of the Civil War ‘‘the
Puritanization of the United States’’ had become a fact of life
throughout most of the North, and the war itself marked the
beginning of its century-long march into the heart of the
South.”
American Civil War was about that; not about the
Segregation of Blacks. Black segregation 'was the religious
pretext'.
16. “Randolph Bourne, one of those critics who blamed the sexual
repression of the 1890s on the Puritans, confessed that ''if
there were no Puritans we should have to invent them.''”
Still true today; the moralistic discourse on the one hand and
the immoral acts of these same religious people, who still
have this acerbic will to dictate their Codes of CONDUCT
TO OTHER INDIVIDUALS;
There is no more immoral act.
17. And this shows the barbaric character of this human species,
which takes pride in being the species chosen by God, but at
the same time, is the most licentious that exists.
And that from a purely biological point of view represents a
Vehement error of nature.
18. “The South, then, was one portion of America that was not
swept into what has been variously called ‘‘the New
Englandization of the nation’’ and ‘‘the Puritanism of the
United States.’’”
And that's the only reason the South was destroyed.
Forget racial Segregation, it was all a pretext.
19. “Although Cotton belonged to the first generation of Puritans
in America, his venture into what Sacvan Bercovitch calls the
‘‘genetics of salvation’’ helped lay the foundations for what
later developed more fully: the idea of ‘‘holy New England,’’
a land whose providential mission entitled it to God’s special
protection.
The Gospel-Covenant, a compilation of sermons. Taken as a
whole, The Gospel-Covenant was a summons to activism and
accountability and at the same time an assurance that God
had something great in store for New England.”
It's funny, but it's always about God, AND NEVER
ABOUT MEN.
20. This is in CONTRAST TO ANTIQUITY Where it was
diametrically the Opposite.
Now if you think that MODERN STATES will ever give
freedom back to the individual, you still don't
understand the nature of monotheism;
a perverse narcissist.
21. From The Puritan Origins of American Sex: Religion,
Sexuality, and National Identity in American Literature by
Tracy Fessenden, Nicholas F. Radel, et al.:
“Certainly, sex among the Puritans has been studied. The
venerable scholar of colonial American culture Edmund
Morgan long ago put to rest the idea that the Puritans were
not interested in sex, that they repressed sexuality in favor
of godly behavior. In an argument that has been cited
repeatedly, Morgan demonstrates that Puritan sexuality was
idealized as a domestic or familial and reproductive
behavior.”
NOTHING HAS CHANGED, this small bourgeois that is the
religious always pisses us of 'with his family model'.
BORING.
22. Always this same model of social organization that we
drag 'FROM MONOTHEISM'.
23. From New aspects of the history of the family in antiquity by
Päivi Setälä:
“There is no term in Greek for "family". The private sphere of
life was the oikos and the public sphere the polis, the city-state.
The oikos is understood as meaning the domestic and family
household, which included property and slaves in addition to
the members of the family household. The man or kyrios was
the judicial head of the oikos. The basis of the way of thought
of the community was that men serve well in duties and
functions of the polis, while the oikos is the sphere and
environment of the women.”
That is WHY ALL OUR MODERN STATES ARE
'MATERNALIST':
24. - For example in the case of Covid, at the same time THESE
MODERN STATES WANT TO PROTECT 'THE WHOLE
POPULATION', and at the same time THESE MODERN
STATES TAKE AWAY THE 'INDIVIDUAL LIBERTIES'.
'This is what women do', they take under their protection
and REMOVE INDIVIDUAL LIBERTIES 'OF THE YOUNG
CHILDREN'.
'YOUNG CHILDREN': that's what you are in the West.
THESE MODERN STATES ARE MATERNAL STATES.
And even the Communism of the 20th century Russia for
example, had the 'SAME MATERNAL TENDENCY';
25. THESE STATES WANTED TO FEED EVERYONE, AND
THIS ENDED IN COLLECTIVE INEFFICIENCY -AND
TENS OF MILLIONS OF DEATHS FROM STARVATION.
THIS IS WHAT WOMEN DO, THEY ARE NOT
PRACTICAL BY DEFINITION.
AND ALL THE MODERN WESTERN STATES HAVE THIS
'MATERNAL ARCHITECTURE', WHETHER IT 'IS FOR
THE LEFT OR THE RIGHT'. IT'S THE SAME.