Qeros

1. Making Sense of Sense
How do our ideas hit the mark?
Shinning a light on sensibility
.
1
E.R.O.S.
The Quadranym Word-Sensibility Model

2. What’s in a word?
2
Making Sense of Sense
The task is to collect commonsense knowledge. How much
informaAon about the world is contained in a single word?
Commonsense Knowing
Acquisition & Ontology

3. “I know nothing in the world that has as much
power as a word. SomeAmes I write one, and I
look at it, unAl it begins to shine.”
–– Emily Dickinson
3
Making Sense of Sense

4. 4
Q: Why can’t computers use language like people do?
A: People experience the world, computers don’t.
Making Sense of Sense

5. InteracAng with the world produces
instances of coherent sense, some of
which are apparent in the words we use.
The Premise
5
Making Sense of Sense

6. There is a disAncAon to be made between a coherent sense of
a word and the potenAal condi:ons it may aim at in the world.
Coherent Sense CondiAonal Sense
6
Making Sense of Sense

7. Coherent
Sense
CondiAonal
Sense
• A desire to eat points to hungry as being a coherent sense of eat.
• What food you’ll have to eat becomes a condi:onal factor of eat.
Corpus: eat
I prepared a
nice bird!
What are we
having to eat?
Corpus: eat
7
Non-declaraAve: hungry DeclaraAve: food
Word: eat
Making Sense of Sense

8. Condi:onal Sense
Denote EAT
Denote BIRD
The verb Eat and the noun Bird together form
a complete unit of thought, “Eat bird.” That
much is clear, what isn’t clear is how they are
categorized as objects of experience.
Let’s say Robin funcAons like a prototype to
provide one with an actual sense of the word,
Bird. Hungry is able to do a similar task for the
word, Eat. Each sense-word acts as a coherent
core for their perspecAve denotaAons. The
sense of "bird" (“robin”) converges with the
sense of "eat" ("hungry") to produce birds that
experience indicates as likely menu opAons.
robin
hungry
PotenAal Foods
PotenAal Birds
Find Meaning
Find Meaning
potenAal
potenAal
actual
actual
Coherent Sense
8
Making Sense of Sense

9. MoAvaAon:
“Eat bird.”
Object: food
Condi:on-Poten:al
Judgment:
“Eat bird.”
Standpoint: hungry
Coherent-Actual
9
Coherent-Condi:onal Units
Occur and Reoccur
Making Sense of Sense

10. Every word in every language is defined relaAve to a frame.
― Charles Fillmore
10
Making Sense of Sense

11. Actual
(self-sense)
PotenAal
(world-sense)
Word
(that-sense)
EAT
mode=sate
state=hungry
state=food
mode=starve
Q-Unit: Quadranym
11
Dynamic Framework for Specified Terms
An opAmal generalizaAon model of the process of concept specificaAon.
States: actual = hungry ⊇ potenAal = food
Modes: poten6al = sate ⊇ actual = starve
Level pertaining
to
rules of grammar
Level pertaining
to
potenAal
interacAons
with the world
Level pertaining
to
actual
contexts
of experience
Conceptualizing States: FROM actual-being TO potenAal-becoming
Conceptualizing Modes: FROM potenAal-acAon TO actual-measure
Making Sense of Sense

12. “When one encounters a new situaAon (or makes a substanAal
change in one's view of the present problem) one selects from
memory a structure called a Frame. This is a remembered framework
to be adapted to fit reality by changing details as necessary.”
― Marvin Minsky
12
Making Sense of Sense

13. 13
The ObjecAve Field
(DeliberaAve Framework)
Constraint
hungry
Include:
Selector
Deliberate
food
Exclude:
CriAc
• Input
• Rerun
• Value
• Output
• Return
• Expense
actual potenAal
potenAal actual
robin
bird
Q-Unit & Network Circuits
Closing The Loop
(Q-Unit: HeurisAc-Framework)
Making Sense of Sense

14. “Framing is the most ordinary thing we do. A frame is a coherent
structure of related concepts so to help make sense of things. ”
― George Lakoff
14
Making Sense of Sense

15. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
System 1:
a. Heuris:c[2]
b. Contextual Trace[4]
c. Q-Unit: Quadranym[4]
d. Meta-Dimensional Roles[4]
Guider
System 2:
a. Delibera:ve[2]
b. Objec:ve Field[4]
c. Seman:c Networks[3]
d. Nodes & Directed Edges[3]
EAT
Framing Systems[1]
Two Systems of Thinking[2]
Eat
Eat
oven
satisfy
hunger
roast
cook
kitchen
savory
Eat
survive
Eat
follow
recipe
Eat
swallow
M
A
v
t
e
d
B
y
G
o
a
l
D
e
s
i
r
e
s
HasProperty
U
s
e
d
F
o
r
A
lt
Lo
ca
A
o
n
CapableOf
H
a
s
P
r
e
r
e
q
u
i
s
i
t
e
U
s
e
d
F
o
r
IsA
LocaAonOf
15
2. See, Two system of thinking - Thinking Fast and Slow (Kahnerman12)
UsedFor
person
food
domesticate
CeatedBy
poultry
3. SemanAc network common sense representaAon -
hrp://www.kurzweilai.net/meme/frame.html
See Also, Open Mind Common Sense (Singh, P. [42]))
Liminal Point:
HeurisAc Dynamic
Prototype:
robin
1. See, Mental Framing - Metaphors We Live By (Lakoff, Johnson[28]) 4. Q-units are like capacitors,
See menu, Q Theory IntroducAon
HeurisAc
Store
CausesDesire UsedFor
Bird
Books, PublicaAons & General References
Driver
SubjecAve-Actual
State-hungry
Mode-starve
ObjecAve-PotenAal
State-food
Mode-sate
Making Sense of Sense

16. “By their very nature, heurisAc shortcuts will produce biases,
and that is true for both humans and arAficial intelligence, but
the heurisAcs of AI are not necessarily the human ones.”
― Daniel Kahneman
16
Making Sense of Sense

17. ObjecAve State:
condiAon-potenAal
Food
AcAon &
Measure
Modes
SubjecAve State:
coherent-actual
Constraint
Hungry
E=sate
Poultry
is Food
R=starve
Robin
not Poultry
Q-Unit: Coherent Bias
Working Memory, Heuris:c Bias,
Predictability & Predic:ve Errors
Eat:
• The probable conclusion is drawn
from the statement, “Eat bird”.
• Robin is not bird in eat
frame of system 1.
• Eat frame is now in discord with
bird frame of system 1.
Poultry is Bird
Robin not Bird
Selector: potenAal
CriAc: actual
DeliberaAve Analysis
Categorical ResoluAon
System2
17
Making Sense of Sense

18. “Your frame of reference is what you see.”
― Jacque Fresco
18
Making Sense of Sense

19. nutri6on
SubjecAve
hungry
EAT
Food
ObjecAve
ingest
Bird
Poultry
S = funcAon
O = structure
O = exclusive
S = inclusive
survive
Coherent à Condi:onal Coherent à Condi:onal
⊇
potenAal
actual
actual
actual
potenAal
potenAal
actual
potenAal
actual potenAal actual potenAal
19
Input......................... by _actual:[S _eat à O _bird]
Output:.......... by _potenAal:[S _food à O _poultry]
Self
Is
Here
Actual
S = hungry
Inclusive
E = bird
PotenAal
O = food
Exclusive
R = poultry
actual
Q-Unit: Generalized System of Nested States
potenAal
Q-Systems: A Hierarchy of Nested States
Arrows = Dynamic Sense
Making Sense of Sense

20. 20
The Q Categorical Axiom:
State: actual ⊇ potenAal
Mode: potenAal⊇ actual
Ontological Descrip:on:
A State is an actual being. An actual being has a becoming; it is always a potenAal becoming.
A Mode is potenAal acAon. A potenAal acAon has a difference; it is always an actual difference.
Like fractals, Q dimensions emerge as self replicaAng parerns across different scales of contextuality.
Realms, hierarchies and domains represent classes of context. The Q-unit represents the fundamental
unit of context in the system and, as we have been demonstraAng, is based on the Q categorical axiom.
actual potenAal
potenAal actual
State
Mode
AcAve Passive
These dimensions exist in Ame and are only
defined or acAve when they are encountered.
Ame
The encounter pertains to unarended sense (habits or sAmulus) and arended sense (focus or viewpoints).
When unarended sense becomes arended sense this is an affect we call, The Orienta:on Of Interac:vity.
(At this point, this parAcular idea is sAll a speculaAve aspect of the model. For more details go to Theory: Post 4)
A General Descrip:on of the Q-unit.
Making Sense of Sense

21. 21
The Drawbridge
The states of a drawbridge determines one's crossing ability. To come
upon a drawbridge one encounters its actual state as either a crossing
state or a non-crossing state.
In the case of a drawbridge, any actual
state has a predicAve potenAal in Ame.
The modes of a drawbridge refers to its acAons. To refer to a drawbridge is to refer to
its potenAal modes indicaAng the up or the down acAon.
In the case of a drawbridge, any acAve potenAal
mode has an actual difference aptly idenAfied.
A simple way to help think about some basic
goal related dynamics as pertaining to the Q
categorical axiom is to consider…
The World Is Full Of Easy Goal Oriented Predic:ons
actual potenAal
potenAal actual
State
AcAve Passive
Time & Goal
Mode
Making Sense of Sense

22. 22
Analogy ConAnued...
The Q Categorical Axiom:
State: actual ⊇ potenAal
Mode: potenAal ⊇ actual
The actual state is always the superset where cross-ability and non-cross-ability
both exist. The potenAal state is the subset where only one of those states exists.
The potenAal mode is always the superset where the up-ness and down-ness are both
acAve measures. The actual mode is the subset where the passive difference is idenAfied.
According to the Q axiom, a mode is always a potenAal acAon or measure, such that, any
acAon or measure is a potenAal response that automaAcally idenAfies its related actual
difference. For instance, if the mode is up, it has an actual difference down. The acAve-
potenAal mode is idenAfied only awer the passive-actual mode is determined. This
suggests a frame of reference (e.g., is the train your on moving or the one next to you?). These
are two points of measure that need not be complimentary terms. A state does not
funcAon in this way, a state’s becoming can be any number of possible condiAons, for
instance, up can become sky, good mood or awake. Occurrent interacAons with the
world will drive remembered responses toward predicAng likely potenAal condiAons.
Making Sense of Sense

23. potenAal actual
acAon measure
actual potenAal
being becoming
Being à becoming Cycles
States
AcAve Passive
Modes
AcAve Passive
Bias
actual ⊇ potenAal potenAal ⊇ actual
Contextual Temporal Cycle Contextual Spa:al Cycle
Q-Unit dynamics are cyclical. A reciprocal dynamic
between ability and opportunity to find resoluAon.
23
1. To encounter an acAve state refers to an experience of actual context and its potenAal in Ame, thus, pertaining to an actual temporal sense.
2. To encounter an acAve mode refers to a potenAal acAon and its discerning actual measure, thus, pertaining to a potenAal of spaAal sense.
The Q Categorical Axiom:
State: actual ⊇ potenAal
Mode: potenAal ⊇ actual
Recursion & ResoluAon
Difference
Drawbridge:[PotenAal_up(actual_self)⊇Actual_down(potenAal_cross)]
The drawbridge is being in Ame The drawbridge has acAons in space
State is about Cross-ability Mode is about Up or Down
Making Sense of Sense
AcAon à Measure Cycles
1. State: Temporal Sense 2. Mode: SpaAal Sense

24. “The only source of knowledge is experience.” ― Albert Einstein
24
Making Sense of Sense

25. 25
The key idea of The Quadranym Word-Sensibility Model is that the environment drives
the actual-subjecAve-sense, while remembering guides the potenAal-objecAve-sense.
To be clear, in this system, there is no real difference between subjecAve reality and
objecAve reality except for how it pertains to context, otherwise there is theoreAcally
only a single empirical reality made experienAally discrete by contextual and
categorical processes. The objecAve sense of a Q-unit pertains to the ability to make
useful predicAons about the world as it applies in context with the subjecAve sense.
“Eat bird.” – Remembering ExperienAal Cycles: FROM flux:[Poultry(food)]à [Bird(hungry)] TO unit:[Bird(hungry)⊇Poultry(food)]
[MaLer(energy)] à [Nutrient(hungry)]
Passive-PotenAal
ObjecAve Guided
AcAve-Actual
SubjecAve Driven
Unit:[Poten6al(actual)⊇Actual(poten6al)]
Q-Unit: Environmental Cause of Concepts
Flux:[Actual(PotenAal)] à [PotenAal(actual)]
Causal Flux
ExperienAal Cycles Form Remembering Units
Environmental Driver
Situa:onal Context
“Eat Bird”
SubjecAve Sense
ObjecAve Sense
Making Sense of Sense

26. Prior to any associaAon a word holds at least two subjects (states) and two predicates (modes).
Q Ontology: Words are not atomic, words are topics.
MoAon
Marer
Passive
AcAve
0
ENERGY
26
modes
Energy:(∀x) Energy(x) ⟹ [AcAve(moAon)⊇ Passive(marer)](x)
states
Q-Unit: A State of Experience Engages a Mode of Difference
1. Ontologically, basic words are specified suitable to grammar rules.
2. Word Representa:on: a word is a predicate with a subject variable.
3. Quadranyms are apt-subjects of predicates iniAaAng a word sense.
Eat(x) Energy(x)
Mul:-Organiza:onal Dynamics
Q-units are about Word-Topics and Theme-Topics.
Making Sense of Sense

27. Expansive
sate, ac6ve
Objec:ve
food, maLer
Subjec:ve
hungry, mo6on
Reduc:ve
starve, passive
Topic
eat à energy
Quadranym Square
(Prime Dimensions)
0
27
Units will organize and nest together for any given topic.
The prime Q is an exemplary quadranym derived from the Q axiom.
Making Sense of Sense

28. 28
Unit(One Clock): [Nutrient(hungry) ⊇ Marer(Energy)]
Flux: a sense driven by the environment.
Unit: remembering how that sense has been driven before.
Flux:[Actual(potenAal)] → [PotenAal(actual)]
Unit:[PotenAal(actual) → Actual(potenAal)]
Flux is a double bracket: [b] → [a]
Unit is a single bracket: [a → b]
Each bracket represents a clock, and like circadian clocks, a self oscillaAng system responds to its environment.
Flux (Two Clocks):[Marer(energy)] à [Nutrient(hungry)]
Remember-ing
Environmental-ing
Scripts can be formed by linking Q-Units together. Each unit is like a frame of a film. ExisAng
units can be inserted or new units can form. The Causal flux is the reason for scripAng units.
SubjecAveab
ObjecAve b
SubjecAve a
ObjecAve b
For instance…
See Q Scripts in menu
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q Scripts
See Q layers, Q-Unit goals form discrete hierarchies, realms and domains
Making Sense of Sense

29. “We are storytelling creatures, and as children we acquire
language to tell those stories that we have inside us.”
― Jerome Bruner
29
Making Sense of Sense

30. I want
chocolate
mousse!
I understand…
but you’re telling
me this, why?
In our model, once moAvated, the listener’s
intenAon is to find cues in the content so to sync
with oscillaAng coherent and condi:onal factors.
InAmaAng Mental States
Pierre
Marie
30
Making Sense of Sense

31. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Pierre, the oscillaAon between coherent
and condi:onal factors are categorically in
sync, so he can then reply, “I understand”.
[Resolve(belief)] à [Urge(desire)]
31
CondiAonal Sense Coherent Sense
Causal Flux
Remember-ing Loop Forms Units
Marie: agent (cf., semanAc role)
[S _self à O _desire]
[S _desire à O _proposiAon]
[S _proposiAon à O _denote]
[S _denote à O _urer]
[S _urer à O _proposiAon]
[S _proposiAon à O _other]
(transcending from intra-subjec:ve to inter-subjec:ve)
Pierre: pa6ent (cf., semanAc role)
[S _other à O _hear]
[S _hear à O _ProposiAon]
[S _proposiAon à O _cause]
[S _cause à O _intenAon]
[S _intenAon à O _proposiAon]
[S _proposiAon àO _denote]
[S _denote à O _instanAate]
[S _instanAate à O _That ProposiAon]
Units & Scripts
Flux: [O] à [S] Unit:[S à O]
To form scripts, the flux changes a condiAonal-sense (reference role) to a
coherent-sense (sense role), for instance, the reference role O _ desire
fluxes to the sense role S _desire. S _desire can now reference its own
object O _x to either intend a denotaAon or create a new sense.
. !, See, In6ma6ng process of uLered signs. (Husserl, E., [23]) Note, Represen6ng causal flux FROM reference TO sense in a Q script
InAmaAng Mental States[1]
driver
Making Sense of Sense

32. “Thinking is an acAve verb, think-ing. It means you are
doing something. One thing you are doing is criAcizing
your thoughts, seeing whether they cohere. And if they
don’t, you begin to change them and experiment with
others. You get new intuiAons, new insights.”
― David Bohm
32
Making Sense of Sense

33. See, Q Theory Introduc:on in site menu. Also See, The Principle of the Orienta:on of Interac:vity in posts: post 6
ConAnuous
Singularity
E: acAve-potenAal
Discrete
MulAplicity
R: passive-actual
Thinking is the ac:ve side of thoughts.
33
acAve-actual
passive-potenAal
Coherent Sense
CondiAonal Sense
Selector: perceiving
CriAc: percepts
A Unit of Remember-ing
How about
Cupcakes?
sigh
* *
or
When one is moAvated, categorical
potenAals become acAve potenAals.
An occurrent unit of moAvaAon is driven toward resoluAon.
Virtually, a unit of internal percepAons arempts to unify
with external percepAons toward equilibrium between
interdependent states to maintain a system process.
That would be great
Sameness Difference
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Making Sense of Sense

34. “To imagine a language is to imagine a form of life.”
― Ludwig Wirgenstein
34
Making Sense of Sense

35. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Environmental CAUSE of Concepts
35
The Birth of a No:on
A coherent noAon is actual, urged and likely to be culAvated. A condiAonal noAon is
a random opportunity and targeted by the coherent noAon. If successfully engaged a
complete act is determined and able to be used repeatedly in some meaningful way.
1, See, : Pre-cogni6ve Condi6ons, Immanent with the Sensible before Transcendental Categories - Phenomenology of Percep6on (Merleau-Ponty[*])
Making Sense of Sense

36. --------------------------------------------------------------
Consider how music feels when you think of these kinds of cycles.
Musical composers incorporate noAons of anAcipaAon and resoluAon to keep listeners engaged.
[urge _hunger à resolve _food]<find>
[urge _food à resolve _fish] <find>
[urge _fish à resolve _water] <find>
[urge _water à resolve _dive] <find>
[urge _dive à resolve _swim]<find>
[urge _swim à resolve _catch] <find>
[urge _catch à resolve _eat] <find>
[urge _eat à resolve _sate] <stop>
Meta-Dimensional Roles: MoAvaAon Cycles
OscillaAng Between MoAvated Units of Context
FISHING SCRIPT
See, Cogni6on as Agent/Environment Dynamics (Chemero [5])
36
Making Sense of Sense
Urge & Resolve Cycles.
Mo:va:onal cycles: NoAons are more reacAve for the Kingfisher and more reflecAve for humans.

37. 37
Making Sense of Sense
“The meaning or value of a thing consists of
what it affords.” ― James J. Gibson

38. TABLE
Bench
scaffold
chair
roof
…
e = raise
r = flat
o = top
s = surface
?
Affordance Flux
pre-reflecAve
reflecAve
38
Flux:[ObjecAve(surface)]<find>[SubjecAve(surface)]
Making Sense of Sense
An Environmental-ing Flux of Opportunity
• The coherent (pre-reflecAve) state affords actual quesAons.
• The condiAonal (reflecAve) state affords potenAal answers.

39. table
subjecAve
offPut
object
objecAve
onSet
surface
A Remember-ing Unit of Opportunity
subjecAve
objecAve
objecAve
subjecAve potenAal
actual
actual
PotenAal
actual
PotenAal
39
Making Sense of Sense
actual
potenAal
Urge(desire)
Resolve(belief)
Unit:[OffPut(rest) à OnSet(surface)]
rest beer
Affordance Unit
In the Q model, predicAng is projecAng experienAal unit cycles out in the world to capture sense making resoluAon.

40. “To understand is to experience harmony
between what we aim at and what is given,
between the intenAon and the performance - and
the body is our anchorage in the world. ”
― Maurice Merleau-Ponty
40
Making Sense of Sense

41. 41
Making Sense of Sense
Procedural Scripts: Hungry:[urge = eat à resolve = s:ck]<find>
The causal flux will drive ways to modify the interacAons with the
world. Humans reflect on their scripts to modify them. If something
works once maybe it will work again or maybe it can be modified
and made more efficient, or used differently in other scenarios.

42. 42
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2, See, Present-At-Hand, Ready-To-Hand (Heidegger[*])
1, See, Phenomenology of Percep6on: Pre-cogni6ve Condi6ons, Immanent with the Sensible before Transcendental Categories (Merleau-Ponty[*])
Task Oriented PercepAon[2]
Seeing what one expects to see.
Script[1]:[subjec:ve-actual _eat à objec:ve-poten:al _coconut ]<find>
A Polynym is a set of
predicates of any number
(usually a small number),
with subject variables, and
owen appear together, and
can be used to frame
situaAonal contexts or topics.
Polynym Dimensions[3]
Eat(x)
Flesh(x)
Coconut(x)
Open(x)
Smash(x)
Each predicate represents a dimension of a polynym topic.
A subject variable of a polynym dimension can select
quadranyms. Quadranyms link together to form Q scripts.
Scripts form on each Polynym dimension to form layers.
The Polynym
3, See, image schema - The Body in the Mind (Johnson M., 1990[*])
Books, PublicaAons & General References
Making Sense of Sense

43. [Subjec:ve _coconut à objec:ve _rock]<find>[Subjec:ve _rock à objec:ve _smash]<find>
[Subjec:ve _smash à objec:ve _coconut]<find>[Subjec:ve _coconut à objec:ve _open]<find>
Predicate: tool
Predicate: hard Causal Flux[1]
FROM Actual(potenAal) TO PotenAal(actual)
43
Forming Scripts
OscillaAng States
ConAnuous Reciprocal CausaAon
[S _open à O _flesh]<find>[S _flesh à O _chew]<find>[S _chew à O _swallow]<stop>
Predicate: food
Predicate: sow
FROM Actual(potenAal) TO PotenAal(actual)
Causal Flux
Making Sense of Sense
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1, Causal flux in this instance can also be referred to as a Modal Flux. Note, Q scripts join almost like a cenApede where each locomoAon system sends signal to the next system.
The objecAve goal is a condiAon-potenAal, and
when found that is no more experience
necessary. The coherent sense doesn’t then
resolve, rather, it becomes something different.
Each new sense is derived from the reference of the previous state frame. Once the new sense finds its
reference then another state frame is pulled, uniquely predicated and a new reference is aptly queried.

44. 44
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2, See, image schema - The Body in the Mind (Johnson M., 1990[*])
1, See, : Pre-cogni6ve Condi6ons, Immanent with the Sensible before Transcendental Categories - Phenomenology of Percep6on (Merleau-Ponty[*])
Meta-Dimensional Roles Content Dimensional Roles
Bias
Eat(x)
Goal Flesh(x)
MoAvate Coconut(x)
Task Open(x)
Modify Smash(x)
e.g., Predicate: Eat(x)
(∀x) eat(x) ⟹ [Sate(hungry) ⊇ Starve(food)(x)]
(∀x) eat(x) ⟹ [Intact(chew) ⊇ Fragment(substance)(x)]
(∀x) eat(x) ⟹ [Available(consume) ⊇ Deplete(resource)(x)]
(∀x) eat(x) ⟹ [Stable(corrode) ⊇ Disintegrate(substance)(x)]
Quadranyms represent certain topical orientaAons that may
or may not apply to a situaAonal context depending on the
polynym predicates. Polynyms are important factors to help
trigger the quadranym sense-topic best suited for context.
Q system analysis makes a disAncAon between content and Meta-Dimensional Roles (M-roles).
M-roles apply to both polynyms and quadranyms. Polynyms may have any number of dimensions.
Meta-Dimensional Roles are ontological categories of
quadranyms and polynyms used to organize the content of a system.
Polynym M-Role Types[2]
Q-units are the subjects of Polynyms
Books, PublicaAons & General References
Q scripts run linearly or can be
strategically divided into layers.
Making Sense of Sense

45. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Context Cycle Rate Subjec:ve Objec:ve
Bias –––––– cycle = r NegaAve a PosiAve b
MoAvate ––– cycle = r Urge a Resolve b
Task –––––– cycle = r Mo6vate a Goal b
Modify –––– cycle = r Func6on a Structure b
Manipulate – cycle = r Control a Conform b
45
See, Ready-To-Hand includes a larger purpose (Heidegger, 1927)
Time Rates of Context
From overarching to occurrent rates of contextual cycles.
Making Sense of Sense
Meta-Dimensional: Quadranym Roles
Meta-Dimensional: Polynym Roles
Each predicate of a polynym will iniAate on different Ameline layers to
execute the script of a situaAonal context. For instance. Eat will cycle
more generally while specific procedures of eat are taking place.
M-role InformaAon can influence between layers and levels.

46. --------------------------------------------------------------
① [S = NegaAve à O = PosiAve]: bias (self conscious – emoAons)*
② [S = Urge à O = Resolve]: moBvate (self reflecAve - emoAonal thinking)*
③ [S = MoAvate à O = Goal]: plan (reflecAon on world - thinking)*
④ [S = FuncAon à O = Structure]: modify (deliberaAve reacAon - thinking)*
⑤ [S = Control à O = Conform]: manipulate (learned - reacAon)*
⑥ [S = Be à O = Become]: transform (insAncAve - reacAon)*
• Each bracket is a feedback loop to move content through scripts.
• Each layer is a Ameline moving content at its own rate of context.
*See, Six level Model (Minsky35)
46
Making Sense of Sense
• Polynym (Hierarchies): any number of ‘ver6cal dimensions’ = ap:tude
• Quadranym (scripts): Q-units in any number of ‘horizontal cycles’ = agtude
Polynym: A Hierarchy of Nested System Layers
Scripts can run linearly or be strategically divided into any number of polynym layers.
There is no one polynym structure – hierarchical structures will compete and change.

47. Meta-Dimensional Roles: Quadranym Examples
Subjec:ve ⊇ Objec:ve States The Bias Roles
Expansive ⊇ Reduc:ve Modes The Difference Roles
Actual ⊇ PotenBal State Set S ⊇ O
Coherent ⊇ CondiAonal State Set S ⊇ O
FuncAon ⊇ Structure State Set S ⊇ O
Control ⊇ Conform State Set S ⊇ O
urge ⊇ resolve State Set S ⊇ O
NegaAve ⊇ PosiAve State Set S ⊇ O
Posi6ve ⊕ Nega6ve Mode Set E(+) ⊕ R(-) ∨ E(-) ⊕ R(+)
PotenBal ⊇ Actual Mode set E ⊇ R
General ⊇ ParAcular Mode set E ⊇ R
AcAve ⊇ Passive Hemispheres E(s) ⊇ R(o)
Infinite ⊇ Finite Hemispheres E(s) ⊇ R(o)
Inclusive ⊇ Exclusive Hemispheres E(s) ⊇ R(o)
Singular ⊇ MulAple Hemispheres E(s) ⊇ R(o) 47
Neg and Pos modes:
Always Switchable Roles
Switch Polarity
Making Sense of Sense

48. 48
Making Sense of Sense
“'Facts, facts, facts,' cries the scienAst if he
wants to emphasize the necessity of a firm
foundaAon for science. What is a fact? A fact is
a thought that is true. But the scienAst will
surely not recognize something which depends
on men's varying states of mind to be the firm
foundaAon of science.” – Gorlob Frege

49. PotenAal
A STATE Of A STAR
It is Phosphorus NOT Hesperus for all to see
No more experience is necessary
So now let’s go have our morning tea
The same for you is the same for me
Making Sense of Sense
That Star:(∀x) star(x) ⟹ [Above(earth)⊇ Below(light)](x)
Actual
The Sense & Reference of a Denota:on[1]:
1. Sense and reference are idenAcal to themselves a=a.
2. Different senses can reference same denotaAon a=b.
Sense of Reference
That Star
Same: The Sense Phosphorus = That Star Phosphorus[1]
InteracAve Level of Sense & Reference
ExperienAal Level of Sense & Reference
Sense of Reference
A simple sense-making reference frame for the topic, That Star.[2]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.See, Sense and Reference (Frege G, [13]) 2. Sense and reference play parAcular ontological roles and provide relaAonal descripAons between Q-Unit dimensions.
49

50. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That Star:[Phosphorus à morning]
That Star:[Hesperus à evening]
• IdenAcal reference to one object (a=a): no more experience necessary (Sense & Reference = passive difference).
• NonidenAcal reference to one object (a=b): more experience necessary (Sense & Reference = ac:ve sameness).
General Topic: Posi:on:[Coherent-actual = Appearanceà Condi:on-poten:al = 6me and space]
That Planet:[Venus ⊇ Phosphorus and Hesperus]
passive
passive
acAve
50
1. See, Sense and Reference(Frege G, [13]) 2. See, Twin Earth "'meanings' just ain't in the head.”(Putnam H,[*])
Making Sense of Sense
No No, that’s not true
The same for me is a difference for you
Phosphorus and Hesperus are both Venus all the way
She disappears and reappears at different Ames of day
But remember… water is the same for all to see
Except on twin earth where it’s XYZ
”’meanings' just ain't in the head.”[2]
It’s all around us in the world insteadJ
Difference: The Sense Phosphorus and The
Sense Hesperus = That Planet Venus[1]
Books, PublicaAons & General References

51. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SubjecAve
Ontology
(AcAve Hemisphere)
E=solar system
S=astronomer[3]
ObjecAve
Ontology
(Passive Hemisphere)
O=planet
R=second
Mode
Mode
Quadranym Inten:onality logic Reference Sense
Expansive-SubjecAve a†tude premise context Mode of context
representaAon[1]
ReducAve-ObjecAve proposiAon conclusion object Mode of object
representaAon[1]
Use of Concept[2] Truth CondiAon[2]
Theme-Topic: Venus
2, See, Use of Concept, Language Game, Truth Condi6ons,’ (Wirgenstein[24,25])
context object
Implicates AcAve Sameness:
more experience necessary
Implicates Passive Difference:
no more experience necessary
51
1, See, Modes of Representa6on (Frege [13])
Making Sense of Sense
3, S=astronomy can also fit theme-topic S _role
PotenAal
Actual
potenAal
interacAons
with the world
actual
contexts
of experience

52. “We think in generaliAes, but we live in detail.”
― Alfred North Whitehead
52
Making Sense of Sense

53. 53
Making Sense of Sense

54. Quan:fying Spa:ality: Door is configured such that, Barrier B is the condi:onal category of the
coherent category Passage P IFF Door D is a condiAonal category of the coherent category Space S.
• Coherent P is all S
• Condi6on B is some S
The phrase, by this I mean x, is a subjecAve qualifying term, wriren as, by _x.
• by _Space: [Coherent = void ⊇ CondiAon = between{door, passage, barrier...}]
• ∀x: Sx → DPBx = coherent: Open(door)
• ∃x: Sx → DPBx = condiAonal: Close(door)
54
The Q Self and a spa:al code toward openness and movement.
Making Sense of Sense

55. 55
Making Sense of Sense

56. “To exist as an individual means not simply to be numerically
disAnct from other things but to be a self-pole in a dynamic
relaAonship with alterity, with what is other, with the world.”
― Evan Thompson
56
Making Sense of Sense

57. By _space: [Subjec:ve = void ⊇ Objec:ve = door]
Subjective
Space
Open
Subjec:ve
State: passage
y
x
subjec:ve
state: barrier
Reduc:ve mode
Expansive mode
0 Close
0
SubjecAve
State: Void
Finite
Infinite
57
Making Sense of Sense
The zero-point of any Q-concept is a self iden:fica:on opportunity.
pass
y
X impasse
Reduc:ve mode
Expansive
mode
0
SubjecAve
State: [_solid]<find>[_condiAon]
0
y
x

58. A real-world locked door means the subjecAvity
of the concept is denied leaving one faced with
only the objecAvity of the concept. SAll, as cued,
it’s a door, because control of Door is
categorically there even if not actually there.
S = dooràControl/Actual O = dooràConform/Poten:al
Coherent
space
CondiAonal
space
Door[passage à barrier]
Open
Subjec:ve
State: passage
Objec:ve
state: barrier
Reduc:ve mode (-)
Expansive mode (+)
0 Close
By _door: [Subjec:ve = passage ⊇ Objec:ve = barrier]
Objec:ve Space
58
Making Sense of Sense

59. Empty is coherently having space.
Between is the condi:on transi:oning space.
ObjecAve Network
CondiAonal Roles
Space
Modes
SubjecAve State
Coherent Role
void
infinite
exit
out
finite
enter
in
potenAal
potenAal
actual
actual
Note: potenAal/actual arrows below
are in relaAon to modes (not states).
States: actual à potenAal
Modes: potenAal à actual
potenAal
actual
actual
actual
actual
potenAal
Space:
59
Making Sense of Sense

60. • SubjecAve: The enAty void is ubiquitous to the topic
of space by virtue of void’s singular principle in every
condiAon of space.
• ObjecAve: The enAty between is a mulAplicity of
principles, such as, enAAes and changing properAes.
One Small detail.
60
Making Sense of Sense

61. “I asked myself about the present: how wide it was,
how deep it was, how much was mine to keep.”
― Kurt Vonnegut
61
Making Sense of Sense

62. 62
Making Sense of Sense

63. The Doors of Time… like we transition space, we transition time… and rarely the other way around.
Everyone does it, we go to the edge of the pool and dip our toe in the water; if the
temperature feels warm we enter quickly if cool we hesitate. The reason we
hesitate to get into a nice pool on a nice hot day is owen the change and not
necessarily the temperature. Once calibrated to air temps our bodies will resist
change because of how sensibility works. The noAce of change is what concerns us.
From: If not now when?
To: If now then?
hrps://www.scienAficamerican.com/arAcle/cold-or-warm-can-we-really-tell/
63
Making Sense of Sense
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Test(swim)] à [Temp(change)]
CondiAonal Sense Coherent Sense
Causal Flux
Remember-ing Loop Forms Units
[Temp(change) à Test(swim)]
driver
Opportunity drives ability.
Ability assesses opportunity.

64. ObjecAve State
Networks
CondiAonal Roles
Time
Modes
SubjecAve
State
Coherent Role
present
future
swim
water
past
test
temp
Present is coherently having :me.
Event is the condi:on transi:oning :me.
potenAal
potenAal
actual
potenAal
actual
actual
potenAal
actual
Note: potenAal/actual arrows below
are in relaAon to modes (not states).
States: actual à potenAal
Modes: potenAal à actual
Time:
64
Making Sense of Sense

65. The everyday sense of :me comes when Now becomes objec:fied.
65
Making Sense of Sense

66. What Now are we talking about?
66
Making Sense of Sense
• SubjecAve: The enAty present is ubiquitous to the
topic of 6me by virtue of present's singular principle
in every condiAon of 6me.
• ObjecAve: The enAty Event is a mulAplicity of
principles, such as, enAAes and changing properAes.

67. • Coherent and Condi:onal subject variables:
ENTITIES: let Saa’ be actual ac6ve’ Subject (coherent) and let Spp’ be poten6al passive’ Subject (condiAonal).
Saa’ ⊇ Spp’
• General and Par:cular predicate variables:
PROPERTIES: let Ppa’ be poten6al ac6ve’ Predicate (general) and let Pap’ be actual passive’ Predicate (parAcular).
Ppa’ ⊇ Pap Q-Units: Quadranym Topics of Space & Time
Let D be denota6on. (x) ⦂ D(x) ⟹ Ppa’(Saa’)⊇ Pap’(Spp’)(x)
67
Quadranym RepresentaAon: Subjects (States) and Predicates (Modes) in Brackets
Making Sense of Sense
It’s easy to loose sight of what a mode is and what a state is when engaged in any complex engineering project.
The Q axiom keeps modes and states straight thus improving the tractability of categorical judgments in a system.
A quadranym is a general proposiAon that is true for all the members and their posiAons of the delineated Q-unit class.
① (∀x) : Space(x) ⟹ [Infinite(void)⊇ Finite(between)](x)
② (∀x) : Time(x) ⟹ [Future(present)⊇ Past(event)](x)
③ (∀x) : Distance(x) ⟹ [Far(posi6on)⊇ Near(rela6on)](x)
④ (∀x) : Direc6on(x) ⟹ [From(posi6on)⊇ To(rela6on)](x)
⑤ (∀x) : Door(x) ⟹ [Open(passage)⊇ Close(barrier)](x)
⑥ (∀x) : Container(x) ⟹ [Out(empty)⊇ In(full)](x)
⑦ (∀x) : Energy(x) ⟹ [Ac6ve(mo6on)⊇ Passive(maLer)](x)

68. “Each part of the brain knows a lirle bit about
what’s happening in some other [parts], but
there’s no single place that knows
everything. ... It’s like a big corporaAon. .”
― Marvin Minsky
68
Making Sense of Sense

69. Different ways of Thinking
69
Making Sense of Sense

70. Topic Expansive
Reduc:ve
Objec:ve
Subjec:ve
Time future past event present
Door open close barrier passage
percepAon sAmuli select organize interpret
logic proposiAon conclusion evidence argument
scienAfic hypothesis fact law theory
science predicAon test analysis hypothesis
Q u a d r a n y m
Matrix
70
Making Sense of Sense

71. Expansive: novel, general.
Reduc:ve: familiar, specific.
Objec:ve: condiAonal noAon.
Subjec:ve: coherent noAon.
General Domains
Topic Expansive Reduc:ve Objec:ve Subjec:ve
Ame future past event present
door open close barrier passage
percepAon sAmuli select organize interpret
logic proposiAon conclusion evidence argument
scienAfic hypothesis fact law theory
science predicAon test analysis hypothesis
71
Making Sense of Sense

72. Topic Expansive Reduc:ve Objec:ve Subjec:ve
Ame future past event present
door open close barrier passage
percepAon sAmuli select organize interpret
logic proposiAon conclusion evidence argument
scienAfic hypothesis fact law theory
science predicAon test analysis hypothesis
Expansive: novel, general.
Reduc:ve: familiar, specific.
Objec:ve: condiAonal noAon.
Subjec:ve: coherent noAon.
72
Making Sense of Sense
General Domains

73. Topic Expansive Reduc:ve Objec:ve Subjec:ve
Ame future past event present
door open close barrier passage
percepAon sAmuli select organize interpret
logic proposiAon conclusion evidence argument
scienAfic hypothesis fact law theory
science predicAon test analysis hypothesis
Expansive: novel, general. Objec:ve: condiAonal organizaAon.
Subjec:ve: coherent noAon. Reduc:ve: familiar, specific.
73
Making Sense of Sense
General Domains

74. Topic Expansive Reduc:ve Objec:ve Subjec:ve
Ame future past event present
door open close barrier passage
percepAon sAmuli select organize interpret
logic proposiAon conclusion evidence argument
scienAfic hypothesis fact law theory
science
predicAon tested analysis hypothesis
Reduc:ve: familiar, specific.
Objec:ve: condiAonal noAon.
Subjec:ve: coherent interpretaAon.
Expansive: novel, general.
74
Making Sense of Sense
General Domains

75. spaAal
expansive
open large
reducAve
close small Roles
content
Dimensions
Domain
potenAal potenAal actual actual
75
Making Sense of Sense
Modes
Complimentary Roles
SpaAal RelaAons of LocaAons

76. categorical
expansive
general inclusive
reducAve
specific exclusive
Dimensions
Domain
potenAal potenAal actual actual
Roles
content
76
Making Sense of Sense
Modes
Complimentary Roles
SpaAal RelaAons of LocaAons

77. mental
expansive
novel unknown
reducAve
familiar known
Dimensions
Domain
potenAal potenAal actual actual
Roles
content
77
Making Sense of Sense
Modes
Complimentary Roles
SpaAal RelaAons of LocaAons

78. E=premise O=evidence
S=claim R=conclusion
argument
Argument
• Subjec:ve: The enAty claim is ubiquitous to the topic argument by virtue of claim’s singular principle
of every condiAon of argument.
• Objec:ve: The enAty evidence is a mulAplicity of principles, such as, enAAes and changing properAes.
• AlternaAve Mode Set: E=Agree - R=Disagree
In conclusion, what we are proposing is a Quadranym Argument.
78
Making Sense of Sense

79. Prime Dimensions
Quadranym & Polynym AcquisiAon
79
Quadranyms and polynyms can be collected into a kind of
thesaurus containing sets of word dimensions that are
generally regarded as strategic ways of thinking. Our hope is
that once quadranyms and polynyms are berer understood
their pracAcal and diverse applicability will be apparent.
Making Sense of Sense

80. Making Sense of Sense
Q Code Tags: qt, qe, qr, qo, qs
(qe) expansive (qo) objec:ve
(qs) subjec:ve (qr) reduc:ve
(qt) = topic
THE QUADRANT GRAPH HELPS TO ILLUSTRATE DIMENSIONAL
RELATIONSHIPS, DIAGONAL, TOP & BOTTOM, LEFT & RIGHT
80
Framing a Topic Using The Quadranym Square
SupplemenAng lexical ontologies with Q-units improves tractability and helps to establish a natural contextual flow of events.
SemanAc network representaAon rely on nodes directed edges, Q representaAon relies on Q-units & meta-dimensional roles.

81. 81
Role: Expansive
Role: ReducAve
Role: SubjecAve
Role: ObjecAve
PosiAve NegaAve
Pull
Push
We present an common sense knowledge acquisiAon effort to collect quadranym Polyordinate
theoreAcal constructs, such as, in the examples given below. We use the term quadranym (literally,
‘four-words’) to mean four dimensional subordinate elements that defines a superordinate axiom.
Making Sense of Sense

82. Making Sense of Sense
All Qs are tested and cerAfied by humans. To assist in this process a
simple sorAng program is used to read back quadranym constructs
through an array of natural language scripts called expression-frames.
Expression-frames are tailored to fit a specific realm or domain.
For example, the Valence Realm.
(qt) = topic, (qe) = expansive, (qr) = reducBve, (qo) = objecBve (qs)= subjecBve.
It is correct to be (qe) instead of (qr) when the situa6on is (qo) but could have been
(qs) when regarding (qt).
Expression Frame
Prime Quadranym
82

83. Making Sense of Sense
qt = mood, qe = bePer, qr = worse, qo = happy, qs = sad
It is correct to be (bePer) instead of (worse) when the situa6on is (happy) but could have been
(sad) when regarding (mood).
It is correct to be (worse) instead of (bePer) when the situa6on is (sad) but could have been
(happy) when regarding (mood).
People can quickly see if their Quadranym makes sense to them.
qt = sensiBvity, qe = soothed, qr = irritated, qo = comfort, qs = discomfort
It is correct to be (soothed) instead of (irritated) when the situa6on is (comfort) but could have been
(discomfort) when regarding (sensiBvity).
83

84. 84
Expression frame interface example.
Making Sense of Sense

85. 85
Making Sense of Sense
The Polynym Thesaurus
A collecAon of topical dimensions of any number.
• Quadranyms represent autogenously uniAzed contextual dimensions.
• Polynyms represent strategically divided contextual dimensions
For normal communicaAons subjects are broken down into any number of dimensions. The Q system
works on two levels, on the inter-personal level where all dimensions are configured as predicates,
these are polynyms. On the intra-personal or responsive level only quadrant dimensions are used.
Like quadranyms, polynyms can also be collected. Many polynyms already
exist in the world since they represent any number of dimensions for
strategic thinking. For example, Freud’s polynym (p3) , Psyche: Id, Ego,
Superego. It is used as a strategy to understand the human mind.

86. Acquisi:on Interface
example: basic (cf., html, Java, python)
86
Making Sense of Sense
We present an interdisciplinary knowledge acquisiAon effort to collect superordinate
theoreAcal constructs, such as, in the current examples. We use the term polynym (literally,
‘many-word’) to mean an array of subordinate elements that defines a superordinate axiom.

87. 87
polynym: a theore:cal construct that is best
described using an array of subordinate terms
id ego superego
Psyche (Freud)
P=3 A=psychology
topic (source)
P=denominator
A=area/discipline
subordinates
}
}
Making Sense of Sense
Introducing

88. 88
id ego superego
Psyche (Freud)
P=3 A=psychology
topic (source)
P=denominator
A=area/discipline
subordinates
}
}
Superordinate
The theoretical construct = {Freud, Psyche}
Subordinates
The theory’s divisions = {id, ego, superego}
Making Sense of Sense

89. 89
id ego superego
Psyche (Freud)
P=3 A=psychology
topic (source)
P=denominator
A=area/discipline
subordinates
}
}
Numerator
The theory topic = {psyche}
Denominator
The number of subordinates = {3}
Making Sense of Sense

90. 90
Goal
• collect synsets of theory subordinates
• build a network of interdisciplinary theories
• enable development by web community
Uses • machine learning • mapping between disciplines
• story understanding • knowledge base inferencing
• interdisciplinary research • language translation
id ego superego
earth metal wood fire water
Psyche, Personality (Freud)
P=3 A=psychology
chi (Wu Xing)
P=5 A=philosophy
reasoning
P=2 A=cog-sci
inducAve deducAve
innate
insAnct
impulse
reflex
want
desire
me
self
raAonal
reason
resolve
decide
ideal
moral
conscience
self-reflecAon
restraint
disapproval
synsets
topic (source)
P=denominator
A=area/discipline
subordinates
}
}
}
{
{
Making Sense of Sense

91. 91
Synonym sets (synsets) are essenAal for story understanding and language
translaAon. However, meaning can change in context of a specific theory…
≠
ego
personality (Freud)
P=3 A=psychology
self
raAonal
reason
resolve
decide
ego
English (WordNet)
conceit
narcissism
pride
vanity
self-esteem
Like a thesaurus, synonym sets in a lexical database like WordNet[#] are highly aligned in
meaning. In the context of a superordinate construct, synonym sets may be more abstract.
CreaAng super/subordinate synonym sets is a unique way to define and compare axioms.
Making Sense of Sense

92. 92
A network of interdisciplinary theories and accompanying synsets can be built
communally. Specialists in different fields collect and compare ideas in one locaAon.
Expert 1 Expert 2
personality (Freud)
P=3 A=psychology
energy (chakra)
P=7 A=philosophy
mood (Ekman)
P=6 A=psychology
intelligence (Gardner)
P=7 A=psychology
chi (Wu Xing)
P=5 A=philosophy
truth (Buddha)
P=4 A=philosophy
Making Sense of Sense

93. 93
Related theories can be retrieved together, even if originaAng from different domains.
theology metaphysics
man (Shultze)
P=3 A=theology
man (Hsing)
P=5 A=metaphysics
Search: humani:es
natural spritual carnal common worthy superior called sage
Making Sense of Sense

94. The Quadranym Sensibility Model (Q): The Q proposal is a method to research and represent word
level concepts, commonsense knowledge and the intersects that dispense a human-like sensibility.
94
Making Sense of Sense
The prime Q is an exemplary quadranym derived from
the Q axiom. It is idenAfied by the acronym EROS:
Expansive, ReducAve, ObjecAve, SubjecAve. (p. 21 - 28)
The Q Categorical Axiom:
State: actual ⊇ poten6al
Mode: poten6al ⊇ actual

95. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Bruner, J. (1984) Actual minds possible world, MIT Press.
2. Jon Barwise and John Perry, Situa6ons and Attudes, 1983. MIT Press, ISBN 0-262-02189-7
3. Chalmers, D. J. (2010) The Character of Consciousness, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Chalmers, D. J. (1996) The Conscious Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Chemero, A., (2009) Radical Embodied CogniAve Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Clark, A., Chalmers, D. J. (1998), reprint, (2010) The Extended Mind. MIT Press.
7. Clark A. (2015) Surfing Uncertainty, Oxford University Press.
8. Dahlgren, K. (1988) Naïve SemanAcs For Natural Language Understanding, Springer US, copy right holder: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
9. Dreyfus, H.L. (ed.) (1982) Husserl, IntenAonality and CogniAve Science, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
10. Fillmore, C. (1968) "Frame semanAcs”, (1982) In LinguisAcs in the Morning Calm. Seoul, Hanshin Publishing Co.,
11. Fodor, J. A. (1978) “ProposiAonal A†tudes” in RePresentaAons: (1984) Philosophical Essays on the FoundaAons of CogniAve Science, J.A. Fodor, Cambridge, Massachusers: MIT Press, 1981.
12. Frege, G. (1891) FuncAon and Concept, in Jenaische Gesellschaw für Medizin und Naturwissenschaw,
13. Frege, G. (1892) On Sense and Reference, Zeitschriw für Philosophie und philosophische KriAk
14. Frege, G. (1892) Concept and Object, in Vierteljahresschriw für wissenschawliche Philosophie XVI
15. Fries, P. (2005). "A mechanism for cogniAve dynamics: neuronal communicaAon through neuronal coherence".
16. Gallagher S. (2005 )How the body shapes the mind. Oxford University Press.
17. Gibson, J.J. (1950). The PercepAon of the Visual World. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
18. Gibson, J. J. (1966). The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems, Boston: Hughton Mifflin.
19. Gibson, J.J. (1972). A Theory of Direct Visual PercepAon. In J. Royce, W. Rozenboom (Eds.). The Psychology of Knowing. New York: Gordon & Breach.
20. Gibson, J.J. (1977). The Theory of Affordances In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (eds.).
21. Heidegger M. (1927) Being and Time, translated by J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1962.
22. Hoff B. (1982) The Tao of Pooh. Duron
23. Husserl, E. (1900/1970) Logical InvesAgaAons, (Engl. Transl. by Findlay, J.N.), London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
24. Husserl, E. (1913) Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy.
25. Kahneman D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Macmillan.
26. Kahneman D. Tversky A.(2000). Choices, Values, and Frames, Cambridge University Press.
27. Kripke S. (1972) SemanAcs of natural language, Reidel Publishing Company.
28. Lakeoff G., Johnson M, (1980) Metaphores we live by, University of Chicago Press.
29. Lenat, D. (2001) Hal's Legacy, 2001's Computer as Dream and Reality. Common Sense and the Mind of HAL". Cycorp, Inc.
30. Lenat, D. and Guha R. V. (1990). Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems: RepresentaAon and Inference in the Cyc Project. Addison-Wesley.
31. Matuszek C. (2005) "Searching for Common Sense: PopulaAng Cyc from the Web". TwenAeth NaAonal Conference on ArAficial Intelligence. Pirsburgh, Pennsylvania.
32. Merleau-Ponty M. (1945) Phenomenology of PercepAon, first published, EdiAons Gallimard, Paris.
33. Miller G. A., Beckwith R, Fellbaum C. D., Gross D., Miller K. (1990). WordNet: An online lexical database. Int. J. Lexicograph
34. Minsky, M. (1986) The Society of Mind. Simon and Schuster.
35. Minsky, M. (2006). The EmoAon Machine. Simon & Schuster.
36. Myin E. (2013) Radicalizing EnacAvism: Basic Minds without Content MIT Press.
37. Plous, S. (1993). The psychology of judgment and decision making. McGraw-Hill.
38. Prinz, J. (2012) The Conscience Brain, Oxford University Press.
39. Rosch, E. (1975) “CogniAve RepresentaAons of SemanAc Categories", Journal of Experimental Psychology.
40. Searle, J. (1983) IntenAonality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Stamenov, N.I., and Gallese, V. (2002) Mirror Neurons and the EvoluAon of Brain and Language. John Benjamins Publishing Co.
42. Singh, P. (2002) The Open Mind Common Sense Project, MIT Medi a Lab January 1, 2002: KurzweilAI.net.
43. Velleman, J. D. 1989. PracAcal ReflecAon . Princeton: Princeton University Press. "The Guise of the Good” In Velleman 2000.
44. Whitehead, A. N. (1929), Process and Reality, New York: Macmillan.
45. Whitehead, A. N. (1933) Adventures of Ideas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; New York: Macmillan.
46. Williams, R.R. (1992). RecogniAon: Fichte and Hegel on the Other. SUNY Press.
47. Wirgenstein, L. (1953) Philosophical InvesAgaAons , G.E.M. Anscombe and R. Rhees (eds.), G.E.M. Anscombe (trans.), Oxford: Blackwell.
48. Wirgenstein, L. (1921) Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (TLP), 1922, C. K. Ogden (trans.), London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
49. Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind
95
Making Sense of Concepts
Important CS acquisiAon projects (The Cyc project: ‘Common Sense knowledge Base’ (Lenat, Guha, 1990)) (Open Mind Common Sense (Singh, P. 2002))
Reference Page Not Complete

96. Dane Scalise – Researcher
Scory Vercoe – MIT Media Lab
Making Sense of Sense
The Quadranym Sensibility Model (EROS)
A Look at the Ordinariness of the Mythic Sense
Identify the box that you seek to think out of;-)
96
Dedicated to coders and thinkers
Buildintuit.com