SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 33
Parsons Behle & Latimer Employment Law Seminar
WORKPLACE DATING POLICIES
IN THE #METOO ERA
Liz M. Mellem
801.536.6694
amellem@parsonsbehle.com
parsonsbehle.com
TUESDAY, MAY 22, 2018 | THE GRAND AMERICA HOTEL
2
 Yes, probably. But why?
– Manage risks created by employees’ relationships
– Combat: turmoil, drop in productivity, sexual harassment charges
• Strengthen legal defenses in sex harassment litigation
– Communicate standards of acceptable behavior to employees (make clear
what is and is not allowed)
– Not to control employees’ personal lives, but to ensure a fair, equitable,
and comfortable work environment for everyone
– Set expectation for employer action if employees’ are in a relationship
Does Your Company Need
a Dating Policy?
3
Workplace Romances are Inevitable
 22% of workers have dated their boss
– Increased from 15% the year prior
 31% of workers who began dating at work ended up getting
married
 24% had an affair with a co-worker where one person involved
was married at the time
 Nearly 1 in 10 female workers whose romance soured left their
job because of it
 41% of workers had to keep their romance a secret
4
 A consensual office relationship poses several risks for
the employer:
– Sexual harassment
– Sexual favoritism by participants
– Third-party retaliation
– Workplace violence
Dangers of Office Romances
5
 Prohibited sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act (and state/local equivalents)
 Generally involves unwelcome sexual conduct
 Risk is exacerbated by:
– Technology: text messages, emails, social networking
– Public displays of affection: kissing, hugging, inappropriate
touching
Sexual Harassment
6
 Quid Pro Quo Harassment
– When supervisor seeks sexual favors in return for job benefit or
to avoid job detriment
 Hostile Work Environment Harassment
– When employer’s environment is so offensive or intimidating on
basis of sex that it alters conditions of employment and makes
environment abusive
Two Types of Sexual Harassment
7
 Claims by participants
– Individual believes adverse employment action is result of office
romance or post-romance behavior
 Claims by third-parties
– Individual believes professionally disadvantaged because
he/she not dating supervisor like other employee
– Can be isolated, coerced, or widespread
Sexual/Paramour Favoritism
8
 If unrequited affection or soured romance leads to
workplace violence, employer can have exposure to
claims for:
– Negligent hiring
– Negligent supervision
– Negligent retention
– Health and safety violations under OSHA
Workplace Violence
9
 Damage to employee morale and productivity
 Higher turnover rates
 Negative publicity
 Conflicts of interest or other ethical problems
Practical Considerations
10
 Conduct regular training
 Ensure that relationships are consensual
 Consider using a “love contract”
 Limit employer involvement
 Document everything
 Inform employees about possible communications monitoring
 Harassment hotline or other resource
 Draft realistic policies and apply uniformly
Overall Best Practices
11
 Sexual harassment training is relatively inexpensive way
to reduce legal exposure
 Require sexual harassment prevention training
– Require employees to sign acknowledgement that received and
understood training
Regular Training is Key
12
 Separate conversations with each individual:
– Confirm relationship is consensual and free of coercion
– Review company’s harassment policy (and other applicable policies)
– Ensure employee has signed applicable policies
– Stress importance of professionalism at work
– Caution against favoritism or activities which could create conflict of
interest
– Advise employee to report any harassing conduct at any time (particularly
after relationship ends)
Ensure Employees’ Relationship is
Consensual
13
 What is it?
– Signed agreement which two parties agree relationship is
consensual and does not involve any sexual harassment
 Why use it?
– Limits liability when/if romantic relationship ends
Use a Love Contract
14
 Acknowledgement that relationship is consensual, voluntary, and
no sexual harassment exists
 Agreement to behave professionally in office and at work events
 Acknowledgement that relationship will not interfere with work
performance
 Acknowledgement that employee is aware of company’s policy
and reporting procedures – and employee will follow both
 Signed by both parties
What to include in the love contract?
15
 Respect employees’ privacy
 Employer’s concern should be only with the potential or
actual negative effect of relationship on the employer
– lost productivity
– Increased gossiping
– Favoritism, etc.
Limit Employer Involvement
16
 Existence of documents, along with employees’
knowledge of documentation, protects employer from
future lawsuits
 Documents should include:
– Recording performance issues of romantically involved
employees
– Love contract
– Company policy acknowledgement
Document Everything
17
 Make sure employees know emails, phone calls, etc. may
be monitored
 Ensure policy includes language notifying employee that
they have no expectation of privacy in workplace
electronic communications
Communications Monitoring
18
 Ensure employees know that any harassment should be
reported immediately
 Provide harassment hotline for anonymous reporting – or
other resource
 Be committed to investigating reports made
Harassment Reporting Mechanism
19
 Complete ban on office romances is unworkable
 Well-written policy will put you in better position to defend
against claims
 Make sure formal policy is:
– Applied uniformly without exception;
– Available to all employees; and
– Written acknowledgement from employee that read/received
– Place it next to/before/after the anti-harassment policy
Realistic Dating Policy
20
 Workplace romances are discouraged
– Consider whether this includes vendors, customers, or other business associates
 Prohibit, limit or give guidance about romances:
– Can limit or prohibit supervisor/subordinate relationships or internal department
relationships
 Ensure guidance about supervisor/subordinate relationships is clear
– Consider prohibiting relationships between employees who (i) are in direct reporting
relationship, or (ii) could advance career through promotion, raise, etc.
– E.g.: if employees become involved, they cannot report to one another, cannot be of
significantly different rank and cannot work in the same department
– Possibility of transfer to another department (keep these as lateral as possible)
 Explain conduct expected from supervisors, managers, and employees
What to include in your Dating Policy?
21
 Require disclosure of relationship to HR or other appropriate party
as soon as it begins
 Require employees to behave professionally and keep
relationship out of work environment
– Cannot act like a couple at work = no PDA and NO FIGHTING
 No sharing of confidential information
 Reiterate anti-harassment policy and reporting mechanisms
 Clearly state consequences for violating policy (e.g., transfer,
schedule change, termination)
Dating Policy Topics Continued
22
 Silicon Valley Consent Model – Yes means Yes
– Facebook and Google are first to implement
• You can ask out your coworker ONCE. If the answer is anything other
than an unequivocal yes, it means no.
– “I can’t tonight. I have other plans.” = No
– “I’m really busy with this project, sorry.” = No
– “I have a partner.” = No
Dating Policy Example 1
23
 “In order to minimize the risk of conflicts of interest and
promote fairness, [EMPLOYER NAME] maintains the
following policy with respect to romance in the workplace:
– No person in a management or supervisory position shall have a romantic
or dating relationship with an employee whom he or she directly
supervises or whose terms or conditions of employment he or she may
influence (examples of terms or conditions of employment include
promotion, termination, discipline, and compensation). In addition, no
employees working in the same department shall have such a
relationship. A department is defined as a group of employees who report
directly to the same supervisor.
Dating Policy Example 2
24
 Prior Employee Relationships:
– [To the extent possible, a/A] supervisor or manager who has
had a previous romantic or dating relationship with a
subordinate or employee whose terms and conditions he or she
may influence will not be involved in decisions relating to that
individual's promotions, raises, termination, or other terms and
conditions of employment.
Dating Policy Example 2 continued
25
 Individuals involved in a relationship covered by this policy may be asked to sign a document
acknowledging that their relationship is entirely consensual and free from coercion and
harassment. [If the relationship is covered by this policy and is between a more senior and
more junior employee, the more senior employee may be subject to demotion to remove the
conflict of interest. [EMPLOYER NAME] will not impose a demotion as a response to a
prohibited relationship between employees who are professional peers.] At the discretion of
[EMPLOYER NAME], [in addition to or instead of demotion,] one of the individuals involved
in the relationship may be subject to transfer or termination of employment. If transfer or
termination is appropriate, to the extent possible, [EMPLOYER NAME] will give individuals
involved in the relationship the opportunity to select one employee in the relationship who will
be subject to a change in employment status (transfer or termination). If the individuals
involved in the relationship decline to make this decision, [EMPLOYER NAME] will do so.
Dating Policy Example 2 continued
26
 Professionalism:
– Employees are expected to conduct themselves in a professional manner at all times.
[Workplace dating or romantic relationships must not interfere with any employee's
professionalism, including treating others with respect and refraining from behavior that
may make others feel uncomfortable (for example, overt physical displays of affection
and using sexual language).] In particular, management personnel are expected to set a
high standard of professional conduct both at work and in any social setting at events
sponsored by [EMPLOYER NAME]. For this reason, management personnel are
prohibited from social interaction with subordinates that is or might be perceived as
inappropriate (for example, unwanted flirting, touching, or other behavior that may be
regarded as sexual harassment).
Dating Policy Example 2 continued
27
 Discretion and Non-Discrimination:
– [EMPLOYER NAME] retains discretion in its enforcement of this policy.
Decisions made under this policy will be made based on operational and
business reasons and without regard to sex, race, color, religion, creed,
age (40 and over), national origin, citizenship, physical or mental disability,
military service or application, [OTHER APPLICABLE PROTECTED
CLASSES FOR RELEVANT STATE(S),] or any other protected
characteristic under federal, state, or local law.
28
 Objective:
– [Company Name] strongly believes that a work environment where employees maintain clear
boundaries between employee personal and business interactions is most effective for conducting
business and enhancing productivity. Although this policy does not prevent the development of
friendships or romantic relationships between co-workers, it does establish boundaries as to how
relationships are conducted during working hours and within the working environment.
– Individuals in supervisory or managerial roles, and those with authority over others’ terms and
conditions of employment, are subject to more stringent requirements under this policy due to their
status as role models, their access to sensitive information, and their ability to affect the terms and
conditions of employment of individuals in subordinate positions.
– This policy does not preclude or interfere with the rights of employees protected by the National
Labor Relations Act or any other applicable statute concerning the employment relationship.
Dating Policy Example 3
29
 Procedures:
1. During working time and in working areas, employees are expected to conduct themselves in an
appropriate workplace manner that does not interfere with others or with overall productivity.
2. During nonworking time, such as lunches, breaks, and before and after work periods, employees
engaging in personal exchanges in nonwork areas should observe an appropriate workplace
manner to avoid offending other workers or putting others in an uncomfortable position.
3. Employees are strictly prohibited from engaging in physical contact that would in any way be
deemed inappropriate by a reasonable person while anywhere on company premises, whether
during working hours or not.
4. Employees who allow personal relationships with co-workers to adversely affect the work
environment will be subject to the appropriate provisions of [Company Name]’s disciplinary policy,
including counseling for minor problems. Failure to change behavior and maintain expected work
responsibilities is viewed as a serious disciplinary matter.
Dating Policy Example 3 continued
30
 Procedures continued:
5. Employee off-duty conduct is generally regarded as private, as long as such conduct does not create problems
within the workplace. An exception to this principle, however, is romantic or sexual relationships between
supervisors and subordinates.
6. Any supervisor, manager, executive or other company official in a sensitive or influential position with
[Company Name] must disclose the existence of a romantic or sexual relationship with another co-worker.
Disclosure may be made to the immediate supervisor or the director of human resources (HR). This disclosure
will enable [Company Name] to determine whether any conflict of interest exists because of the relative
positions of the individuals involved.
7. With regard to Paragraph 6, when a conflict-of-interest problem or potential risk is identified, [Company Name]
will work with the parties involved to consider options for resolving the problem. The initial solution may be to
make sure the parties no longer work together on matters where one is able to influence the other or take
action for the other. Matters such as hiring, firing, promotions, performance management, compensation
decisions and financial transactions are examples of situations that may require reallocation of duties to avoid
any actual or perceived reward or disadvantage. In some cases, other measures may be necessary, such as
transfer to other positions or departments.
Dating Policy Example 3 continued
31
 Procedures continued:
8. With regard to Paragraph 6, if one or both parties refuse to accept a reasonable solution or to offer
of alternative position, if available, such refusal will be deemed a voluntary resignation.
9. Failure to cooperate with [Company Name] to resolve a conflict or problem caused by a romantic
or sexual relationship between co-workers or among managers, supervisors or others in positions
of authority over another employee in a mutually agreeable fashion may be deemed
insubordination and cause for immediate termination. The disciplinary policy of [Company Name]
will be followed to ensure fairness and consistency before any such extreme measures are
undertaken.
10.The provisions of this policy apply regardless of the sexual orientation of the parties involved.
11.Where doubts exist as to the specific meaning of the terms used above, employees should make
judgments on the basis of the overall spirit and intent of this policy.
12.Any concerns about the administration of this policy should be addressed to the director of HR.
Dating Policy Example 3 continued
32
 EEOC
– Fantastic resource, especially for small businesses
– www.eeoc.gov
– https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/task_force/harassment
Additional Suggested Resource
33
 Liz M. Mellem
801.536.6694
amellem@parsonsbehle.com
Thank You

More Related Content

What's hot

Respectful Workplace
Respectful WorkplaceRespectful Workplace
Respectful WorkplaceShaun Moore
 
Human Resources Insight - Termination- Training Manual
Human Resources Insight - Termination- Training ManualHuman Resources Insight - Termination- Training Manual
Human Resources Insight - Termination- Training ManualLaura Lee
 
Automating PeopleSoft Employee Onboarding with Ease
Automating PeopleSoft Employee Onboarding with EaseAutomating PeopleSoft Employee Onboarding with Ease
Automating PeopleSoft Employee Onboarding with EaseSmart ERP Solutions, Inc.
 
Motivation-Techniques and Examples
Motivation-Techniques and ExamplesMotivation-Techniques and Examples
Motivation-Techniques and ExamplesDeepika Ramanathan
 
Sexual Harassment at workplace
Sexual Harassment at workplaceSexual Harassment at workplace
Sexual Harassment at workplaceShahzad Khan
 
Prevention of Sexual Harassment at Workplace Act
Prevention of Sexual Harassment at Workplace ActPrevention of Sexual Harassment at Workplace Act
Prevention of Sexual Harassment at Workplace ActAID FOR CHANGE
 
Job satisfaction-120112001047-phpapp01
Job satisfaction-120112001047-phpapp01Job satisfaction-120112001047-phpapp01
Job satisfaction-120112001047-phpapp01IT
 
Sexual Harassment in the Workplace- Richard Garrity
Sexual Harassment in the Workplace- Richard GarritySexual Harassment in the Workplace- Richard Garrity
Sexual Harassment in the Workplace- Richard GarrityRichard Garrity
 

What's hot (11)

Motivaton
MotivatonMotivaton
Motivaton
 
Mobbing laboral
Mobbing laboralMobbing laboral
Mobbing laboral
 
Respectful Workplace
Respectful WorkplaceRespectful Workplace
Respectful Workplace
 
Human Resources Insight - Termination- Training Manual
Human Resources Insight - Termination- Training ManualHuman Resources Insight - Termination- Training Manual
Human Resources Insight - Termination- Training Manual
 
Automating PeopleSoft Employee Onboarding with Ease
Automating PeopleSoft Employee Onboarding with EaseAutomating PeopleSoft Employee Onboarding with Ease
Automating PeopleSoft Employee Onboarding with Ease
 
Motivation-Techniques and Examples
Motivation-Techniques and ExamplesMotivation-Techniques and Examples
Motivation-Techniques and Examples
 
Sexual Harassment at workplace
Sexual Harassment at workplaceSexual Harassment at workplace
Sexual Harassment at workplace
 
Prevention of Sexual Harassment at Workplace Act
Prevention of Sexual Harassment at Workplace ActPrevention of Sexual Harassment at Workplace Act
Prevention of Sexual Harassment at Workplace Act
 
Ley 1010 de 2006
Ley 1010 de 2006Ley 1010 de 2006
Ley 1010 de 2006
 
Job satisfaction-120112001047-phpapp01
Job satisfaction-120112001047-phpapp01Job satisfaction-120112001047-phpapp01
Job satisfaction-120112001047-phpapp01
 
Sexual Harassment in the Workplace- Richard Garrity
Sexual Harassment in the Workplace- Richard GarritySexual Harassment in the Workplace- Richard Garrity
Sexual Harassment in the Workplace- Richard Garrity
 

Similar to Workplace Dating Policies in the #MeToo Era

Love is in the Air: The Dangers of Workplace Romances and How to Protect Your...
Love is in the Air: The Dangers of Workplace Romances and How to Protect Your...Love is in the Air: The Dangers of Workplace Romances and How to Protect Your...
Love is in the Air: The Dangers of Workplace Romances and How to Protect Your...Parsons Behle & Latimer
 
Love is in the Air: The Dangers of Workplace Romances and How to Protect Your...
Love is in the Air: The Dangers of Workplace Romances and How to Protect Your...Love is in the Air: The Dangers of Workplace Romances and How to Protect Your...
Love is in the Air: The Dangers of Workplace Romances and How to Protect Your...Parsons Behle & Latimer
 
Professional ethical conduct
Professional ethical conductProfessional ethical conduct
Professional ethical conductMoatasem Mabrouk
 
Sexual Harassment Training-Managers 2015
Sexual Harassment Training-Managers 2015Sexual Harassment Training-Managers 2015
Sexual Harassment Training-Managers 2015Lisa Z. Garvic
 
Pender ems fire manual powerpoint traininggpedits
Pender ems  fire manual powerpoint traininggpeditsPender ems  fire manual powerpoint traininggpedits
Pender ems fire manual powerpoint traininggpeditsEMSMedic79
 
DEALING WITH WORKPLACE BULLYING - A WORKER’S GUIDE
 DEALING WITH WORKPLACE BULLYING - A WORKER’S GUIDE DEALING WITH WORKPLACE BULLYING - A WORKER’S GUIDE
DEALING WITH WORKPLACE BULLYING - A WORKER’S GUIDEFlint Wilkes
 
Employees' Off-the-Job Conduct - Employee Rights and Employee Risks
Employees' Off-the-Job Conduct - Employee Rights and Employee RisksEmployees' Off-the-Job Conduct - Employee Rights and Employee Risks
Employees' Off-the-Job Conduct - Employee Rights and Employee RisksParsons Behle & Latimer
 
Social Media Policy And Work
Social Media Policy  And WorkSocial Media Policy  And Work
Social Media Policy And WorkLakesia Wright
 
The Do's and Don'ts of Workplace Romance
The Do's and Don'ts of Workplace RomanceThe Do's and Don'ts of Workplace Romance
The Do's and Don'ts of Workplace RomanceRudner Law
 
Employee grievance
Employee grievanceEmployee grievance
Employee grievanceBibin Ssb
 
Students  are required to draft an anti-discriminationharassmen.docx
Students  are required to draft an anti-discriminationharassmen.docxStudents  are required to draft an anti-discriminationharassmen.docx
Students  are required to draft an anti-discriminationharassmen.docxdarwinming1
 
Bad Rules & Policies Often Leads to Loss of Great Employee!
Bad Rules & Policies Often Leads to Loss of Great Employee!Bad Rules & Policies Often Leads to Loss of Great Employee!
Bad Rules & Policies Often Leads to Loss of Great Employee!Cycloides
 
Creating a Dealership Social Media Policy With Teeth
Creating a Dealership Social Media Policy With TeethCreating a Dealership Social Media Policy With Teeth
Creating a Dealership Social Media Policy With TeethJim Radogna
 
Employee-employer relationship, discipline management and grievance handling
Employee-employer relationship, discipline management and grievance handling Employee-employer relationship, discipline management and grievance handling
Employee-employer relationship, discipline management and grievance handling Souman Guha
 
HRPA Hamilton: Managing Off-duty Conduct
HRPA Hamilton: Managing Off-duty ConductHRPA Hamilton: Managing Off-duty Conduct
HRPA Hamilton: Managing Off-duty ConductRudner Law
 

Similar to Workplace Dating Policies in the #MeToo Era (20)

Love is in the Air: The Dangers of Workplace Romances and How to Protect Your...
Love is in the Air: The Dangers of Workplace Romances and How to Protect Your...Love is in the Air: The Dangers of Workplace Romances and How to Protect Your...
Love is in the Air: The Dangers of Workplace Romances and How to Protect Your...
 
Love is in the Air: The Dangers of Workplace Romances and How to Protect Your...
Love is in the Air: The Dangers of Workplace Romances and How to Protect Your...Love is in the Air: The Dangers of Workplace Romances and How to Protect Your...
Love is in the Air: The Dangers of Workplace Romances and How to Protect Your...
 
Professional ethical conduct
Professional ethical conductProfessional ethical conduct
Professional ethical conduct
 
Employee Handbook
Employee HandbookEmployee Handbook
Employee Handbook
 
Sexual Harassment Training-Managers 2015
Sexual Harassment Training-Managers 2015Sexual Harassment Training-Managers 2015
Sexual Harassment Training-Managers 2015
 
Pender ems fire manual powerpoint traininggpedits
Pender ems  fire manual powerpoint traininggpeditsPender ems  fire manual powerpoint traininggpedits
Pender ems fire manual powerpoint traininggpedits
 
DEALING WITH WORKPLACE BULLYING - A WORKER’S GUIDE
 DEALING WITH WORKPLACE BULLYING - A WORKER’S GUIDE DEALING WITH WORKPLACE BULLYING - A WORKER’S GUIDE
DEALING WITH WORKPLACE BULLYING - A WORKER’S GUIDE
 
Employees' Off-the-Job Conduct - Employee Rights and Employee Risks
Employees' Off-the-Job Conduct - Employee Rights and Employee RisksEmployees' Off-the-Job Conduct - Employee Rights and Employee Risks
Employees' Off-the-Job Conduct - Employee Rights and Employee Risks
 
Social Media Policy And Work
Social Media Policy  And WorkSocial Media Policy  And Work
Social Media Policy And Work
 
HR Basics
HR BasicsHR Basics
HR Basics
 
The Do's and Don'ts of Workplace Romance
The Do's and Don'ts of Workplace RomanceThe Do's and Don'ts of Workplace Romance
The Do's and Don'ts of Workplace Romance
 
Sexual Harassment webinar 11-21-2011
Sexual Harassment webinar 11-21-2011Sexual Harassment webinar 11-21-2011
Sexual Harassment webinar 11-21-2011
 
Employee grievance
Employee grievanceEmployee grievance
Employee grievance
 
Students  are required to draft an anti-discriminationharassmen.docx
Students  are required to draft an anti-discriminationharassmen.docxStudents  are required to draft an anti-discriminationharassmen.docx
Students  are required to draft an anti-discriminationharassmen.docx
 
Bad Rules & Policies Often Leads to Loss of Great Employee!
Bad Rules & Policies Often Leads to Loss of Great Employee!Bad Rules & Policies Often Leads to Loss of Great Employee!
Bad Rules & Policies Often Leads to Loss of Great Employee!
 
Company policies
Company policiesCompany policies
Company policies
 
Radogna
RadognaRadogna
Radogna
 
Creating a Dealership Social Media Policy With Teeth
Creating a Dealership Social Media Policy With TeethCreating a Dealership Social Media Policy With Teeth
Creating a Dealership Social Media Policy With Teeth
 
Employee-employer relationship, discipline management and grievance handling
Employee-employer relationship, discipline management and grievance handling Employee-employer relationship, discipline management and grievance handling
Employee-employer relationship, discipline management and grievance handling
 
HRPA Hamilton: Managing Off-duty Conduct
HRPA Hamilton: Managing Off-duty ConductHRPA Hamilton: Managing Off-duty Conduct
HRPA Hamilton: Managing Off-duty Conduct
 

More from Parsons Behle & Latimer

Navigating the ADA: Case Studies on Reasonable Accommodation
Navigating the ADA: Case Studies on Reasonable AccommodationNavigating the ADA: Case Studies on Reasonable Accommodation
Navigating the ADA: Case Studies on Reasonable AccommodationParsons Behle & Latimer
 
Navigating the ADA: Case Studies on Reasonable Accommodation
Navigating the ADA: Case Studies on Reasonable AccommodationNavigating the ADA: Case Studies on Reasonable Accommodation
Navigating the ADA: Case Studies on Reasonable AccommodationParsons Behle & Latimer
 
Preventing and Responding to Workplace Violence and the New HB 324
Preventing and Responding to Workplace Violence and the New HB 324Preventing and Responding to Workplace Violence and the New HB 324
Preventing and Responding to Workplace Violence and the New HB 324Parsons Behle & Latimer
 
Employee Life Cycle III: Termination Trepidation - Identifying and Avoiding t...
Employee Life Cycle III: Termination Trepidation - Identifying and Avoiding t...Employee Life Cycle III: Termination Trepidation - Identifying and Avoiding t...
Employee Life Cycle III: Termination Trepidation - Identifying and Avoiding t...Parsons Behle & Latimer
 
Employee Life Cycle I: HR Law Issues Pre-employment
Employee Life Cycle I: HR Law Issues Pre-employmentEmployee Life Cycle I: HR Law Issues Pre-employment
Employee Life Cycle I: HR Law Issues Pre-employmentParsons Behle & Latimer
 
Employee Life Cycle II: HR Law Issues During Employment
Employee Life Cycle II: HR Law Issues During EmploymentEmployee Life Cycle II: HR Law Issues During Employment
Employee Life Cycle II: HR Law Issues During EmploymentParsons Behle & Latimer
 
Conducting Effective Workplace Investigations
Conducting Effective Workplace InvestigationsConducting Effective Workplace Investigations
Conducting Effective Workplace InvestigationsParsons Behle & Latimer
 
Confidentiality Issues Arising Under the ADA, FMLA, HIPAA
Confidentiality Issues Arising Under the ADA, FMLA, HIPAAConfidentiality Issues Arising Under the ADA, FMLA, HIPAA
Confidentiality Issues Arising Under the ADA, FMLA, HIPAAParsons Behle & Latimer
 
The Major Questions Doctrine: A Review of the Supreme Court Decision in West ...
The Major Questions Doctrine: A Review of the Supreme Court Decision in West ...The Major Questions Doctrine: A Review of the Supreme Court Decision in West ...
The Major Questions Doctrine: A Review of the Supreme Court Decision in West ...Parsons Behle & Latimer
 
Inflation Reduction Act - Broad Observations
Inflation Reduction Act - Broad ObservationsInflation Reduction Act - Broad Observations
Inflation Reduction Act - Broad ObservationsParsons Behle & Latimer
 
Social Media: What's Not to Like About Social Media in the Workplace?
Social Media: What's Not to Like About Social Media in the Workplace?Social Media: What's Not to Like About Social Media in the Workplace?
Social Media: What's Not to Like About Social Media in the Workplace?Parsons Behle & Latimer
 
Everything You Want to Ask Your Lawyer But Are Afraid to Ask
Everything You Want to Ask Your Lawyer But Are Afraid to AskEverything You Want to Ask Your Lawyer But Are Afraid to Ask
Everything You Want to Ask Your Lawyer But Are Afraid to AskParsons Behle & Latimer
 
Privacy in the Workplace: How Much Snooping is Legal and Proper?
Privacy in the Workplace: How Much Snooping is Legal and Proper?Privacy in the Workplace: How Much Snooping is Legal and Proper?
Privacy in the Workplace: How Much Snooping is Legal and Proper?Parsons Behle & Latimer
 
Every Case Really is a Story: Four State and Federal Caselaw Stories and Lessons
Every Case Really is a Story: Four State and Federal Caselaw Stories and LessonsEvery Case Really is a Story: Four State and Federal Caselaw Stories and Lessons
Every Case Really is a Story: Four State and Federal Caselaw Stories and LessonsParsons Behle & Latimer
 
Breaking HR Law News: Legislative and Regulatory Update
Breaking HR Law News: Legislative and Regulatory UpdateBreaking HR Law News: Legislative and Regulatory Update
Breaking HR Law News: Legislative and Regulatory UpdateParsons Behle & Latimer
 

More from Parsons Behle & Latimer (20)

Navigating the ADA: Case Studies on Reasonable Accommodation
Navigating the ADA: Case Studies on Reasonable AccommodationNavigating the ADA: Case Studies on Reasonable Accommodation
Navigating the ADA: Case Studies on Reasonable Accommodation
 
Labor Issues for the Non-Union Employer
Labor Issues for the Non-Union EmployerLabor Issues for the Non-Union Employer
Labor Issues for the Non-Union Employer
 
Navigating the ADA: Case Studies on Reasonable Accommodation
Navigating the ADA: Case Studies on Reasonable AccommodationNavigating the ADA: Case Studies on Reasonable Accommodation
Navigating the ADA: Case Studies on Reasonable Accommodation
 
Preventing and Responding to Workplace Violence and the New HB 324
Preventing and Responding to Workplace Violence and the New HB 324Preventing and Responding to Workplace Violence and the New HB 324
Preventing and Responding to Workplace Violence and the New HB 324
 
Employee Life Cycle III: Termination Trepidation - Identifying and Avoiding t...
Employee Life Cycle III: Termination Trepidation - Identifying and Avoiding t...Employee Life Cycle III: Termination Trepidation - Identifying and Avoiding t...
Employee Life Cycle III: Termination Trepidation - Identifying and Avoiding t...
 
Employee Life Cycle I: HR Law Issues Pre-employment
Employee Life Cycle I: HR Law Issues Pre-employmentEmployee Life Cycle I: HR Law Issues Pre-employment
Employee Life Cycle I: HR Law Issues Pre-employment
 
Employee Life Cycle II: HR Law Issues During Employment
Employee Life Cycle II: HR Law Issues During EmploymentEmployee Life Cycle II: HR Law Issues During Employment
Employee Life Cycle II: HR Law Issues During Employment
 
Conducting Effective Workplace Investigations
Conducting Effective Workplace InvestigationsConducting Effective Workplace Investigations
Conducting Effective Workplace Investigations
 
Regulatory Hot Topics
Regulatory Hot TopicsRegulatory Hot Topics
Regulatory Hot Topics
 
Confidentiality Issues Arising Under the ADA, FMLA, HIPAA
Confidentiality Issues Arising Under the ADA, FMLA, HIPAAConfidentiality Issues Arising Under the ADA, FMLA, HIPAA
Confidentiality Issues Arising Under the ADA, FMLA, HIPAA
 
The Corporate Transparency Act
The Corporate Transparency ActThe Corporate Transparency Act
The Corporate Transparency Act
 
The Major Questions Doctrine: A Review of the Supreme Court Decision in West ...
The Major Questions Doctrine: A Review of the Supreme Court Decision in West ...The Major Questions Doctrine: A Review of the Supreme Court Decision in West ...
The Major Questions Doctrine: A Review of the Supreme Court Decision in West ...
 
Inflation Reduction Act - Broad Observations
Inflation Reduction Act - Broad ObservationsInflation Reduction Act - Broad Observations
Inflation Reduction Act - Broad Observations
 
Social Media: What's Not to Like About Social Media in the Workplace?
Social Media: What's Not to Like About Social Media in the Workplace?Social Media: What's Not to Like About Social Media in the Workplace?
Social Media: What's Not to Like About Social Media in the Workplace?
 
Everything You Want to Ask Your Lawyer But Are Afraid to Ask
Everything You Want to Ask Your Lawyer But Are Afraid to AskEverything You Want to Ask Your Lawyer But Are Afraid to Ask
Everything You Want to Ask Your Lawyer But Are Afraid to Ask
 
The ADA and Bosses Behaving Badly
The ADA and Bosses Behaving BadlyThe ADA and Bosses Behaving Badly
The ADA and Bosses Behaving Badly
 
Common Mistakes Employers Make
Common Mistakes Employers MakeCommon Mistakes Employers Make
Common Mistakes Employers Make
 
Privacy in the Workplace: How Much Snooping is Legal and Proper?
Privacy in the Workplace: How Much Snooping is Legal and Proper?Privacy in the Workplace: How Much Snooping is Legal and Proper?
Privacy in the Workplace: How Much Snooping is Legal and Proper?
 
Every Case Really is a Story: Four State and Federal Caselaw Stories and Lessons
Every Case Really is a Story: Four State and Federal Caselaw Stories and LessonsEvery Case Really is a Story: Four State and Federal Caselaw Stories and Lessons
Every Case Really is a Story: Four State and Federal Caselaw Stories and Lessons
 
Breaking HR Law News: Legislative and Regulatory Update
Breaking HR Law News: Legislative and Regulatory UpdateBreaking HR Law News: Legislative and Regulatory Update
Breaking HR Law News: Legislative and Regulatory Update
 

Recently uploaded

Cleades Robinson's Commitment to Service
Cleades Robinson's Commitment to ServiceCleades Robinson's Commitment to Service
Cleades Robinson's Commitment to ServiceCleades Robinson
 
Arbitration, mediation and conciliation in India
Arbitration, mediation and conciliation in IndiaArbitration, mediation and conciliation in India
Arbitration, mediation and conciliation in IndiaNafiaNazim
 
一比一原版利兹大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版利兹大学毕业证学位证书一比一原版利兹大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版利兹大学毕业证学位证书E LSS
 
如何办理纽约州立大学石溪分校毕业证学位证书
 如何办理纽约州立大学石溪分校毕业证学位证书 如何办理纽约州立大学石溪分校毕业证学位证书
如何办理纽约州立大学石溪分校毕业证学位证书Fir sss
 
如何办理(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证学位证书
 如何办理(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证学位证书 如何办理(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证学位证书Fir sss
 
如何办理美国加州大学欧文分校毕业证(本硕)UCI学位证书
如何办理美国加州大学欧文分校毕业证(本硕)UCI学位证书如何办理美国加州大学欧文分校毕业证(本硕)UCI学位证书
如何办理美国加州大学欧文分校毕业证(本硕)UCI学位证书Fir L
 
如何办理(UoM毕业证书)曼彻斯特大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(UoM毕业证书)曼彻斯特大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(UoM毕业证书)曼彻斯特大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(UoM毕业证书)曼彻斯特大学毕业证学位证书srst S
 
Offences against property (TRESPASS, BREAKING
Offences against property (TRESPASS, BREAKINGOffences against property (TRESPASS, BREAKING
Offences against property (TRESPASS, BREAKINGPRAKHARGUPTA419620
 
Introduction to Corruption, definition, types, impact and conclusion
Introduction to Corruption, definition, types, impact and conclusionIntroduction to Corruption, definition, types, impact and conclusion
Introduction to Corruption, definition, types, impact and conclusionAnuragMishra811030
 
如何办理新加坡南洋理工大学毕业证(本硕)NTU学位证书
如何办理新加坡南洋理工大学毕业证(本硕)NTU学位证书如何办理新加坡南洋理工大学毕业证(本硕)NTU学位证书
如何办理新加坡南洋理工大学毕业证(本硕)NTU学位证书Fir L
 
Essentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmm
Essentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmmEssentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmm
Essentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmm2020000445musaib
 
如何办理(SFSta文凭证书)美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(SFSta文凭证书)美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(SFSta文凭证书)美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(SFSta文凭证书)美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书Fs Las
 
Mediation ppt for study materials. notes
Mediation ppt for study materials. notesMediation ppt for study materials. notes
Mediation ppt for study materials. notesPRATIKNAYAK31
 
Transferable and Non-Transferable Property.pptx
Transferable and Non-Transferable Property.pptxTransferable and Non-Transferable Property.pptx
Transferable and Non-Transferable Property.pptx2020000445musaib
 
如何办理(USF文凭证书)美国旧金山大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(USF文凭证书)美国旧金山大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(USF文凭证书)美国旧金山大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(USF文凭证书)美国旧金山大学毕业证学位证书Fs Las
 
如何办理普利茅斯大学毕业证(本硕)Plymouth学位证书
如何办理普利茅斯大学毕业证(本硕)Plymouth学位证书如何办理普利茅斯大学毕业证(本硕)Plymouth学位证书
如何办理普利茅斯大学毕业证(本硕)Plymouth学位证书Fir L
 
如何办理威斯康星大学密尔沃基分校毕业证学位证书
 如何办理威斯康星大学密尔沃基分校毕业证学位证书 如何办理威斯康星大学密尔沃基分校毕业证学位证书
如何办理威斯康星大学密尔沃基分校毕业证学位证书Fir sss
 
如何办理新西兰奥克兰商学院毕业证(本硕)AIS学位证书
如何办理新西兰奥克兰商学院毕业证(本硕)AIS学位证书如何办理新西兰奥克兰商学院毕业证(本硕)AIS学位证书
如何办理新西兰奥克兰商学院毕业证(本硕)AIS学位证书Fir L
 
如何办理(Lincoln文凭证书)林肯大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(Lincoln文凭证书)林肯大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(Lincoln文凭证书)林肯大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(Lincoln文凭证书)林肯大学毕业证学位证书Fs Las
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Cleades Robinson's Commitment to Service
Cleades Robinson's Commitment to ServiceCleades Robinson's Commitment to Service
Cleades Robinson's Commitment to Service
 
Arbitration, mediation and conciliation in India
Arbitration, mediation and conciliation in IndiaArbitration, mediation and conciliation in India
Arbitration, mediation and conciliation in India
 
一比一原版利兹大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版利兹大学毕业证学位证书一比一原版利兹大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版利兹大学毕业证学位证书
 
如何办理纽约州立大学石溪分校毕业证学位证书
 如何办理纽约州立大学石溪分校毕业证学位证书 如何办理纽约州立大学石溪分校毕业证学位证书
如何办理纽约州立大学石溪分校毕业证学位证书
 
如何办理(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证学位证书
 如何办理(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证学位证书 如何办理(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(KPU毕业证书)加拿大昆特兰理工大学毕业证学位证书
 
如何办理美国加州大学欧文分校毕业证(本硕)UCI学位证书
如何办理美国加州大学欧文分校毕业证(本硕)UCI学位证书如何办理美国加州大学欧文分校毕业证(本硕)UCI学位证书
如何办理美国加州大学欧文分校毕业证(本硕)UCI学位证书
 
Rohini Sector 25 Call Girls Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Saikh No Advance
Rohini Sector 25 Call Girls Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Saikh No AdvanceRohini Sector 25 Call Girls Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Saikh No Advance
Rohini Sector 25 Call Girls Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Saikh No Advance
 
如何办理(UoM毕业证书)曼彻斯特大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(UoM毕业证书)曼彻斯特大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(UoM毕业证书)曼彻斯特大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(UoM毕业证书)曼彻斯特大学毕业证学位证书
 
Offences against property (TRESPASS, BREAKING
Offences against property (TRESPASS, BREAKINGOffences against property (TRESPASS, BREAKING
Offences against property (TRESPASS, BREAKING
 
Introduction to Corruption, definition, types, impact and conclusion
Introduction to Corruption, definition, types, impact and conclusionIntroduction to Corruption, definition, types, impact and conclusion
Introduction to Corruption, definition, types, impact and conclusion
 
如何办理新加坡南洋理工大学毕业证(本硕)NTU学位证书
如何办理新加坡南洋理工大学毕业证(本硕)NTU学位证书如何办理新加坡南洋理工大学毕业证(本硕)NTU学位证书
如何办理新加坡南洋理工大学毕业证(本硕)NTU学位证书
 
Essentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmm
Essentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmmEssentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmm
Essentials of a Valid Transfer.pptxmmmmmm
 
如何办理(SFSta文凭证书)美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(SFSta文凭证书)美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(SFSta文凭证书)美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(SFSta文凭证书)美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书
 
Mediation ppt for study materials. notes
Mediation ppt for study materials. notesMediation ppt for study materials. notes
Mediation ppt for study materials. notes
 
Transferable and Non-Transferable Property.pptx
Transferable and Non-Transferable Property.pptxTransferable and Non-Transferable Property.pptx
Transferable and Non-Transferable Property.pptx
 
如何办理(USF文凭证书)美国旧金山大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(USF文凭证书)美国旧金山大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(USF文凭证书)美国旧金山大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(USF文凭证书)美国旧金山大学毕业证学位证书
 
如何办理普利茅斯大学毕业证(本硕)Plymouth学位证书
如何办理普利茅斯大学毕业证(本硕)Plymouth学位证书如何办理普利茅斯大学毕业证(本硕)Plymouth学位证书
如何办理普利茅斯大学毕业证(本硕)Plymouth学位证书
 
如何办理威斯康星大学密尔沃基分校毕业证学位证书
 如何办理威斯康星大学密尔沃基分校毕业证学位证书 如何办理威斯康星大学密尔沃基分校毕业证学位证书
如何办理威斯康星大学密尔沃基分校毕业证学位证书
 
如何办理新西兰奥克兰商学院毕业证(本硕)AIS学位证书
如何办理新西兰奥克兰商学院毕业证(本硕)AIS学位证书如何办理新西兰奥克兰商学院毕业证(本硕)AIS学位证书
如何办理新西兰奥克兰商学院毕业证(本硕)AIS学位证书
 
如何办理(Lincoln文凭证书)林肯大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(Lincoln文凭证书)林肯大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(Lincoln文凭证书)林肯大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(Lincoln文凭证书)林肯大学毕业证学位证书
 

Workplace Dating Policies in the #MeToo Era

  • 1. Parsons Behle & Latimer Employment Law Seminar WORKPLACE DATING POLICIES IN THE #METOO ERA Liz M. Mellem 801.536.6694 amellem@parsonsbehle.com parsonsbehle.com TUESDAY, MAY 22, 2018 | THE GRAND AMERICA HOTEL
  • 2. 2  Yes, probably. But why? – Manage risks created by employees’ relationships – Combat: turmoil, drop in productivity, sexual harassment charges • Strengthen legal defenses in sex harassment litigation – Communicate standards of acceptable behavior to employees (make clear what is and is not allowed) – Not to control employees’ personal lives, but to ensure a fair, equitable, and comfortable work environment for everyone – Set expectation for employer action if employees’ are in a relationship Does Your Company Need a Dating Policy?
  • 3. 3 Workplace Romances are Inevitable  22% of workers have dated their boss – Increased from 15% the year prior  31% of workers who began dating at work ended up getting married  24% had an affair with a co-worker where one person involved was married at the time  Nearly 1 in 10 female workers whose romance soured left their job because of it  41% of workers had to keep their romance a secret
  • 4. 4  A consensual office relationship poses several risks for the employer: – Sexual harassment – Sexual favoritism by participants – Third-party retaliation – Workplace violence Dangers of Office Romances
  • 5. 5  Prohibited sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (and state/local equivalents)  Generally involves unwelcome sexual conduct  Risk is exacerbated by: – Technology: text messages, emails, social networking – Public displays of affection: kissing, hugging, inappropriate touching Sexual Harassment
  • 6. 6  Quid Pro Quo Harassment – When supervisor seeks sexual favors in return for job benefit or to avoid job detriment  Hostile Work Environment Harassment – When employer’s environment is so offensive or intimidating on basis of sex that it alters conditions of employment and makes environment abusive Two Types of Sexual Harassment
  • 7. 7  Claims by participants – Individual believes adverse employment action is result of office romance or post-romance behavior  Claims by third-parties – Individual believes professionally disadvantaged because he/she not dating supervisor like other employee – Can be isolated, coerced, or widespread Sexual/Paramour Favoritism
  • 8. 8  If unrequited affection or soured romance leads to workplace violence, employer can have exposure to claims for: – Negligent hiring – Negligent supervision – Negligent retention – Health and safety violations under OSHA Workplace Violence
  • 9. 9  Damage to employee morale and productivity  Higher turnover rates  Negative publicity  Conflicts of interest or other ethical problems Practical Considerations
  • 10. 10  Conduct regular training  Ensure that relationships are consensual  Consider using a “love contract”  Limit employer involvement  Document everything  Inform employees about possible communications monitoring  Harassment hotline or other resource  Draft realistic policies and apply uniformly Overall Best Practices
  • 11. 11  Sexual harassment training is relatively inexpensive way to reduce legal exposure  Require sexual harassment prevention training – Require employees to sign acknowledgement that received and understood training Regular Training is Key
  • 12. 12  Separate conversations with each individual: – Confirm relationship is consensual and free of coercion – Review company’s harassment policy (and other applicable policies) – Ensure employee has signed applicable policies – Stress importance of professionalism at work – Caution against favoritism or activities which could create conflict of interest – Advise employee to report any harassing conduct at any time (particularly after relationship ends) Ensure Employees’ Relationship is Consensual
  • 13. 13  What is it? – Signed agreement which two parties agree relationship is consensual and does not involve any sexual harassment  Why use it? – Limits liability when/if romantic relationship ends Use a Love Contract
  • 14. 14  Acknowledgement that relationship is consensual, voluntary, and no sexual harassment exists  Agreement to behave professionally in office and at work events  Acknowledgement that relationship will not interfere with work performance  Acknowledgement that employee is aware of company’s policy and reporting procedures – and employee will follow both  Signed by both parties What to include in the love contract?
  • 15. 15  Respect employees’ privacy  Employer’s concern should be only with the potential or actual negative effect of relationship on the employer – lost productivity – Increased gossiping – Favoritism, etc. Limit Employer Involvement
  • 16. 16  Existence of documents, along with employees’ knowledge of documentation, protects employer from future lawsuits  Documents should include: – Recording performance issues of romantically involved employees – Love contract – Company policy acknowledgement Document Everything
  • 17. 17  Make sure employees know emails, phone calls, etc. may be monitored  Ensure policy includes language notifying employee that they have no expectation of privacy in workplace electronic communications Communications Monitoring
  • 18. 18  Ensure employees know that any harassment should be reported immediately  Provide harassment hotline for anonymous reporting – or other resource  Be committed to investigating reports made Harassment Reporting Mechanism
  • 19. 19  Complete ban on office romances is unworkable  Well-written policy will put you in better position to defend against claims  Make sure formal policy is: – Applied uniformly without exception; – Available to all employees; and – Written acknowledgement from employee that read/received – Place it next to/before/after the anti-harassment policy Realistic Dating Policy
  • 20. 20  Workplace romances are discouraged – Consider whether this includes vendors, customers, or other business associates  Prohibit, limit or give guidance about romances: – Can limit or prohibit supervisor/subordinate relationships or internal department relationships  Ensure guidance about supervisor/subordinate relationships is clear – Consider prohibiting relationships between employees who (i) are in direct reporting relationship, or (ii) could advance career through promotion, raise, etc. – E.g.: if employees become involved, they cannot report to one another, cannot be of significantly different rank and cannot work in the same department – Possibility of transfer to another department (keep these as lateral as possible)  Explain conduct expected from supervisors, managers, and employees What to include in your Dating Policy?
  • 21. 21  Require disclosure of relationship to HR or other appropriate party as soon as it begins  Require employees to behave professionally and keep relationship out of work environment – Cannot act like a couple at work = no PDA and NO FIGHTING  No sharing of confidential information  Reiterate anti-harassment policy and reporting mechanisms  Clearly state consequences for violating policy (e.g., transfer, schedule change, termination) Dating Policy Topics Continued
  • 22. 22  Silicon Valley Consent Model – Yes means Yes – Facebook and Google are first to implement • You can ask out your coworker ONCE. If the answer is anything other than an unequivocal yes, it means no. – “I can’t tonight. I have other plans.” = No – “I’m really busy with this project, sorry.” = No – “I have a partner.” = No Dating Policy Example 1
  • 23. 23  “In order to minimize the risk of conflicts of interest and promote fairness, [EMPLOYER NAME] maintains the following policy with respect to romance in the workplace: – No person in a management or supervisory position shall have a romantic or dating relationship with an employee whom he or she directly supervises or whose terms or conditions of employment he or she may influence (examples of terms or conditions of employment include promotion, termination, discipline, and compensation). In addition, no employees working in the same department shall have such a relationship. A department is defined as a group of employees who report directly to the same supervisor. Dating Policy Example 2
  • 24. 24  Prior Employee Relationships: – [To the extent possible, a/A] supervisor or manager who has had a previous romantic or dating relationship with a subordinate or employee whose terms and conditions he or she may influence will not be involved in decisions relating to that individual's promotions, raises, termination, or other terms and conditions of employment. Dating Policy Example 2 continued
  • 25. 25  Individuals involved in a relationship covered by this policy may be asked to sign a document acknowledging that their relationship is entirely consensual and free from coercion and harassment. [If the relationship is covered by this policy and is between a more senior and more junior employee, the more senior employee may be subject to demotion to remove the conflict of interest. [EMPLOYER NAME] will not impose a demotion as a response to a prohibited relationship between employees who are professional peers.] At the discretion of [EMPLOYER NAME], [in addition to or instead of demotion,] one of the individuals involved in the relationship may be subject to transfer or termination of employment. If transfer or termination is appropriate, to the extent possible, [EMPLOYER NAME] will give individuals involved in the relationship the opportunity to select one employee in the relationship who will be subject to a change in employment status (transfer or termination). If the individuals involved in the relationship decline to make this decision, [EMPLOYER NAME] will do so. Dating Policy Example 2 continued
  • 26. 26  Professionalism: – Employees are expected to conduct themselves in a professional manner at all times. [Workplace dating or romantic relationships must not interfere with any employee's professionalism, including treating others with respect and refraining from behavior that may make others feel uncomfortable (for example, overt physical displays of affection and using sexual language).] In particular, management personnel are expected to set a high standard of professional conduct both at work and in any social setting at events sponsored by [EMPLOYER NAME]. For this reason, management personnel are prohibited from social interaction with subordinates that is or might be perceived as inappropriate (for example, unwanted flirting, touching, or other behavior that may be regarded as sexual harassment). Dating Policy Example 2 continued
  • 27. 27  Discretion and Non-Discrimination: – [EMPLOYER NAME] retains discretion in its enforcement of this policy. Decisions made under this policy will be made based on operational and business reasons and without regard to sex, race, color, religion, creed, age (40 and over), national origin, citizenship, physical or mental disability, military service or application, [OTHER APPLICABLE PROTECTED CLASSES FOR RELEVANT STATE(S),] or any other protected characteristic under federal, state, or local law.
  • 28. 28  Objective: – [Company Name] strongly believes that a work environment where employees maintain clear boundaries between employee personal and business interactions is most effective for conducting business and enhancing productivity. Although this policy does not prevent the development of friendships or romantic relationships between co-workers, it does establish boundaries as to how relationships are conducted during working hours and within the working environment. – Individuals in supervisory or managerial roles, and those with authority over others’ terms and conditions of employment, are subject to more stringent requirements under this policy due to their status as role models, their access to sensitive information, and their ability to affect the terms and conditions of employment of individuals in subordinate positions. – This policy does not preclude or interfere with the rights of employees protected by the National Labor Relations Act or any other applicable statute concerning the employment relationship. Dating Policy Example 3
  • 29. 29  Procedures: 1. During working time and in working areas, employees are expected to conduct themselves in an appropriate workplace manner that does not interfere with others or with overall productivity. 2. During nonworking time, such as lunches, breaks, and before and after work periods, employees engaging in personal exchanges in nonwork areas should observe an appropriate workplace manner to avoid offending other workers or putting others in an uncomfortable position. 3. Employees are strictly prohibited from engaging in physical contact that would in any way be deemed inappropriate by a reasonable person while anywhere on company premises, whether during working hours or not. 4. Employees who allow personal relationships with co-workers to adversely affect the work environment will be subject to the appropriate provisions of [Company Name]’s disciplinary policy, including counseling for minor problems. Failure to change behavior and maintain expected work responsibilities is viewed as a serious disciplinary matter. Dating Policy Example 3 continued
  • 30. 30  Procedures continued: 5. Employee off-duty conduct is generally regarded as private, as long as such conduct does not create problems within the workplace. An exception to this principle, however, is romantic or sexual relationships between supervisors and subordinates. 6. Any supervisor, manager, executive or other company official in a sensitive or influential position with [Company Name] must disclose the existence of a romantic or sexual relationship with another co-worker. Disclosure may be made to the immediate supervisor or the director of human resources (HR). This disclosure will enable [Company Name] to determine whether any conflict of interest exists because of the relative positions of the individuals involved. 7. With regard to Paragraph 6, when a conflict-of-interest problem or potential risk is identified, [Company Name] will work with the parties involved to consider options for resolving the problem. The initial solution may be to make sure the parties no longer work together on matters where one is able to influence the other or take action for the other. Matters such as hiring, firing, promotions, performance management, compensation decisions and financial transactions are examples of situations that may require reallocation of duties to avoid any actual or perceived reward or disadvantage. In some cases, other measures may be necessary, such as transfer to other positions or departments. Dating Policy Example 3 continued
  • 31. 31  Procedures continued: 8. With regard to Paragraph 6, if one or both parties refuse to accept a reasonable solution or to offer of alternative position, if available, such refusal will be deemed a voluntary resignation. 9. Failure to cooperate with [Company Name] to resolve a conflict or problem caused by a romantic or sexual relationship between co-workers or among managers, supervisors or others in positions of authority over another employee in a mutually agreeable fashion may be deemed insubordination and cause for immediate termination. The disciplinary policy of [Company Name] will be followed to ensure fairness and consistency before any such extreme measures are undertaken. 10.The provisions of this policy apply regardless of the sexual orientation of the parties involved. 11.Where doubts exist as to the specific meaning of the terms used above, employees should make judgments on the basis of the overall spirit and intent of this policy. 12.Any concerns about the administration of this policy should be addressed to the director of HR. Dating Policy Example 3 continued
  • 32. 32  EEOC – Fantastic resource, especially for small businesses – www.eeoc.gov – https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/task_force/harassment Additional Suggested Resource
  • 33. 33  Liz M. Mellem 801.536.6694 amellem@parsonsbehle.com Thank You

Editor's Notes

  1. Also called “fraternization” or “anti-dating policies” – designed to manage romantic relationships in the workplace Examples of touchy situations: -An HR manager knew about an upcoming layoff. Her partner, who worked in another department, knew nothing about it. The HR manager revealed this confidential information, violating an essential condition of her job and potentially undermining trust in the entire HR department. -Employees complained about feeling unable to have difficult conversations with their boss who was one member of a couple. Though the couple worked in different departments, employees felt that pillow talk was inevitable and they didn’t want their confidential information spreading through the company. -In a worst-case scenario, one couple let their relationship problems spill into the workplace and fought in front of coworkers. **It all might go fine, but you need to protect yourself, the company and the other employees if crazy creeps in
  2. 2018 CareerBuilder’s Annual Valentine’s Day Survey 36% of workers reported dating a co-worker (down from 41% last year) 1 in 5 men say they have dated someone at work two or more times in their career Reality is that people are going to date. They spend the most time they have during the week at work, and attractions are inevitable. How to manage that is the key.
  3. Why should you care? It can lead to problems – lack of professionalism, lack of productivity Key here is that we’re assuming relationship is consensual – anything else is much more dangerous for the employer When workplace romances sour, it can be an incubator of #MeToo experiences!
  4. Most common legal risk Prohibited sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act Most common claim between supervisors and subordinates because of power imbalance risk of 3rd parties feeling ostracized/marginalized Also situations where affection not reciprocated; 3rd parties take offense to relationship, impact on workplace or potential to create favoritism; relationship ends badly; relationship is adulterous Technology: flirting inappropriately, sexting, “virtual” or “textual” harassment PDA: if others observe PDAs that plaintiff then claims were harassing, it’s easier for the plaintiff to prove (witnesses!)
  5. Quid pro quo = something for something QPQ: job benefit could be promotion, raise, better schedule QPQ: job detriment could be demotion, pay cut, worse schedule _employee must show conduct was UNWELCOME and truly consensual relationships do not involve unwelcome conduct --typically arises after consensual relationship ends and (i) one party continues to demand additional sexual conduct in exchange for employment benefits or (ii) employee suffers tangible employment harm for refusing to submit to the demands Schrader v. EG&G, Inc. 953 F. Supp 1160 (D. Colo. 1997) HWE: Derek went over this in first hour -employer can be vicariously liable for HWE harassment by supervisors and possibly non-supervisors if employer was actually or constructively aware of the harassment -very fact intensive so, claims generally withstand summary judgment and can create costly litigation expenses -Examples: repeated and offensive sexual teasing or jokes, pressure for dates or sex, sexual touching, sexually demeaning comments -BUT, can be a single event if shocking enough
  6. Claim by participant: firing or demotion - former employee may allege were fired by jilted lover after ending affair -often come under discrimination/harassment of Title VII but typically rejected if find that unfavorable professional consequence was related to the romance itself (not demands for sexual conduct or P’s gender) *can be costly because fact intensive = time and money Claim by 3rd party: supervisor is in romantic relationship with one subordinate and others believe they are disadvantaged -isolated: single person favoritism generally okay because it discriminates equally against all other employees (regardless of gender, so no gender discrimination); same thing with retaliation for complaining about single favoritism = not discrimination, so retaliation is not unlawful -coerced/widespread: when supervisor favorites subordinate because of submission to sexual coercion/demands, other employees can claim were injured by coercion and discrimination because were denied job advancement because would not submit to sexual demands (sexual harassment claim if sexual favors are unspoken job requirement) *general rule: without coercion, a supervisor’s decision to grant or deny employment benefit to subordinate paramour (or spouse or friend) does not constitute illegal sex discrimination or harassment [just plain nepotism] *but, unwise to tolerate favoritism because it’s hard to police what is “incidental” and what may become actionable
  7. Neg hiring: failing to appropriately screen employees, resulting in harm to others by employee with violent or criminal history Neg supervision: failing to provide adequate supervision Neg retention: retaining employee after employer becomes aware that employee could pose risk of harm to employees or others
  8. Complete prohibition is unworkable We’ll quickly go through each of these in order, leaving policies for the last piece so that we can go through some examples.
  9. Allows employer to easily hand over harassment policy, info re mechanism for reporting claims, and training provided to plaintiff’s lawyer when requested
  10. Drawbacks: can be cumbersome and feel juvenile, can drive relationships underground But potential risks of not suing outweigh challenges – contract encourages communication and openness between managers, and employees (and provides valuable layer for defending against harassment suits) Reality is that this is probably more of a “lawyer” thing, but could help in the long run and during litigation BUT, if any employee refuses to sign one of these (especially when they are the subordinate at work), consider it a RED FLAG and possibly needs investigating (why won’t they sign if the relationship is consensual? Has the subordinate felt pressured during the relationship?) Beware of balancing company’s need to protect itself from harassment claims with employees’ privacy rights Whether to use a love contract depends on the employer’s particular culture and their risk aversion for litigation
  11. Performance issues: helps show adverse employment action was because of performance not harassment, romance, or gender
  12. Helps to combat against likely complaint that employee was unable/afraid to report harassment/discrimination *Ellerth/Faragher defense: primarily defends against hostile work environment sexual harassment claims under certain circumstances employer will argue that it exercised reasonable care to prevent and promptly correct harassing behavior; important if plaintiff unreasonable failed to take advantage of preventative/corrective opportunities provided by employer or to otherwise avoid harm (e.g., not taking advantage of reporting procedures) -documents will support this -solid reporting structure will support this
  13. Written acknowledgement: can be signature in employee handbook if policy included there
  14. *note that one consequences of supervisor/subordinate relationship would be transfer to another department (if the two are in the same department) – but be careful when looking to transfer the subordinate because if she’s female, as is often the case, could lead to disparate (and discriminatory) impact on female employees
  15. Having a formal policy doesn’t mean you have to write someone up every time you find out about a casual date. However, you do have to act immediately if productivity is affected, if you get complaints from employees, or gossip and conflict are tearing a department apart. Pull the two employees aside, preferably together. Some conversation starters might include: -I’m not comfortable having to bring this up, but your productivity (or your department’s productivity) has dramatically changed, so I feel I must intervene. -I know your personal life is your own business, but there have been complaints (of favoritism, of public displays of affection, etc.) that must be addressed.
  16. In the #MeToo moment, we’ve heard copious horror stories about men who used sex as a way to manipulate and abuse the women they work with—accusations that ran the horror gamut from bosses who told female employees their dresses weren't "tight enough" to men who showed women photos of their penises at work parties. The possibility for sex to become a weapon used against women is too much of a clear and present danger for companies to leave office relationships unregulated. If there are no clear rules about what constitutes inappropriate behavior, then harassment will flourish. Focus, here, is on affirmative consent
  17. This is from Exhibit A behind the slides
  18. This is from Exhibit B at the back of the slides