1. Parsons Behle & Latimer Employment Law Seminar
WORKPLACE DATING POLICIES
IN THE #METOO ERA
Liz M. Mellem
801.536.6694
amellem@parsonsbehle.com
parsonsbehle.com
TUESDAY, MAY 22, 2018 | THE GRAND AMERICA HOTEL
2. 2
Yes, probably. But why?
– Manage risks created by employees’ relationships
– Combat: turmoil, drop in productivity, sexual harassment charges
• Strengthen legal defenses in sex harassment litigation
– Communicate standards of acceptable behavior to employees (make clear
what is and is not allowed)
– Not to control employees’ personal lives, but to ensure a fair, equitable,
and comfortable work environment for everyone
– Set expectation for employer action if employees’ are in a relationship
Does Your Company Need
a Dating Policy?
3. 3
Workplace Romances are Inevitable
22% of workers have dated their boss
– Increased from 15% the year prior
31% of workers who began dating at work ended up getting
married
24% had an affair with a co-worker where one person involved
was married at the time
Nearly 1 in 10 female workers whose romance soured left their
job because of it
41% of workers had to keep their romance a secret
4. 4
A consensual office relationship poses several risks for
the employer:
– Sexual harassment
– Sexual favoritism by participants
– Third-party retaliation
– Workplace violence
Dangers of Office Romances
5. 5
Prohibited sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act (and state/local equivalents)
Generally involves unwelcome sexual conduct
Risk is exacerbated by:
– Technology: text messages, emails, social networking
– Public displays of affection: kissing, hugging, inappropriate
touching
Sexual Harassment
6. 6
Quid Pro Quo Harassment
– When supervisor seeks sexual favors in return for job benefit or
to avoid job detriment
Hostile Work Environment Harassment
– When employer’s environment is so offensive or intimidating on
basis of sex that it alters conditions of employment and makes
environment abusive
Two Types of Sexual Harassment
7. 7
Claims by participants
– Individual believes adverse employment action is result of office
romance or post-romance behavior
Claims by third-parties
– Individual believes professionally disadvantaged because
he/she not dating supervisor like other employee
– Can be isolated, coerced, or widespread
Sexual/Paramour Favoritism
8. 8
If unrequited affection or soured romance leads to
workplace violence, employer can have exposure to
claims for:
– Negligent hiring
– Negligent supervision
– Negligent retention
– Health and safety violations under OSHA
Workplace Violence
9. 9
Damage to employee morale and productivity
Higher turnover rates
Negative publicity
Conflicts of interest or other ethical problems
Practical Considerations
10. 10
Conduct regular training
Ensure that relationships are consensual
Consider using a “love contract”
Limit employer involvement
Document everything
Inform employees about possible communications monitoring
Harassment hotline or other resource
Draft realistic policies and apply uniformly
Overall Best Practices
11. 11
Sexual harassment training is relatively inexpensive way
to reduce legal exposure
Require sexual harassment prevention training
– Require employees to sign acknowledgement that received and
understood training
Regular Training is Key
12. 12
Separate conversations with each individual:
– Confirm relationship is consensual and free of coercion
– Review company’s harassment policy (and other applicable policies)
– Ensure employee has signed applicable policies
– Stress importance of professionalism at work
– Caution against favoritism or activities which could create conflict of
interest
– Advise employee to report any harassing conduct at any time (particularly
after relationship ends)
Ensure Employees’ Relationship is
Consensual
13. 13
What is it?
– Signed agreement which two parties agree relationship is
consensual and does not involve any sexual harassment
Why use it?
– Limits liability when/if romantic relationship ends
Use a Love Contract
14. 14
Acknowledgement that relationship is consensual, voluntary, and
no sexual harassment exists
Agreement to behave professionally in office and at work events
Acknowledgement that relationship will not interfere with work
performance
Acknowledgement that employee is aware of company’s policy
and reporting procedures – and employee will follow both
Signed by both parties
What to include in the love contract?
15. 15
Respect employees’ privacy
Employer’s concern should be only with the potential or
actual negative effect of relationship on the employer
– lost productivity
– Increased gossiping
– Favoritism, etc.
Limit Employer Involvement
16. 16
Existence of documents, along with employees’
knowledge of documentation, protects employer from
future lawsuits
Documents should include:
– Recording performance issues of romantically involved
employees
– Love contract
– Company policy acknowledgement
Document Everything
17. 17
Make sure employees know emails, phone calls, etc. may
be monitored
Ensure policy includes language notifying employee that
they have no expectation of privacy in workplace
electronic communications
Communications Monitoring
18. 18
Ensure employees know that any harassment should be
reported immediately
Provide harassment hotline for anonymous reporting – or
other resource
Be committed to investigating reports made
Harassment Reporting Mechanism
19. 19
Complete ban on office romances is unworkable
Well-written policy will put you in better position to defend
against claims
Make sure formal policy is:
– Applied uniformly without exception;
– Available to all employees; and
– Written acknowledgement from employee that read/received
– Place it next to/before/after the anti-harassment policy
Realistic Dating Policy
20. 20
Workplace romances are discouraged
– Consider whether this includes vendors, customers, or other business associates
Prohibit, limit or give guidance about romances:
– Can limit or prohibit supervisor/subordinate relationships or internal department
relationships
Ensure guidance about supervisor/subordinate relationships is clear
– Consider prohibiting relationships between employees who (i) are in direct reporting
relationship, or (ii) could advance career through promotion, raise, etc.
– E.g.: if employees become involved, they cannot report to one another, cannot be of
significantly different rank and cannot work in the same department
– Possibility of transfer to another department (keep these as lateral as possible)
Explain conduct expected from supervisors, managers, and employees
What to include in your Dating Policy?
21. 21
Require disclosure of relationship to HR or other appropriate party
as soon as it begins
Require employees to behave professionally and keep
relationship out of work environment
– Cannot act like a couple at work = no PDA and NO FIGHTING
No sharing of confidential information
Reiterate anti-harassment policy and reporting mechanisms
Clearly state consequences for violating policy (e.g., transfer,
schedule change, termination)
Dating Policy Topics Continued
22. 22
Silicon Valley Consent Model – Yes means Yes
– Facebook and Google are first to implement
• You can ask out your coworker ONCE. If the answer is anything other
than an unequivocal yes, it means no.
– “I can’t tonight. I have other plans.” = No
– “I’m really busy with this project, sorry.” = No
– “I have a partner.” = No
Dating Policy Example 1
23. 23
“In order to minimize the risk of conflicts of interest and
promote fairness, [EMPLOYER NAME] maintains the
following policy with respect to romance in the workplace:
– No person in a management or supervisory position shall have a romantic
or dating relationship with an employee whom he or she directly
supervises or whose terms or conditions of employment he or she may
influence (examples of terms or conditions of employment include
promotion, termination, discipline, and compensation). In addition, no
employees working in the same department shall have such a
relationship. A department is defined as a group of employees who report
directly to the same supervisor.
Dating Policy Example 2
24. 24
Prior Employee Relationships:
– [To the extent possible, a/A] supervisor or manager who has
had a previous romantic or dating relationship with a
subordinate or employee whose terms and conditions he or she
may influence will not be involved in decisions relating to that
individual's promotions, raises, termination, or other terms and
conditions of employment.
Dating Policy Example 2 continued
25. 25
Individuals involved in a relationship covered by this policy may be asked to sign a document
acknowledging that their relationship is entirely consensual and free from coercion and
harassment. [If the relationship is covered by this policy and is between a more senior and
more junior employee, the more senior employee may be subject to demotion to remove the
conflict of interest. [EMPLOYER NAME] will not impose a demotion as a response to a
prohibited relationship between employees who are professional peers.] At the discretion of
[EMPLOYER NAME], [in addition to or instead of demotion,] one of the individuals involved
in the relationship may be subject to transfer or termination of employment. If transfer or
termination is appropriate, to the extent possible, [EMPLOYER NAME] will give individuals
involved in the relationship the opportunity to select one employee in the relationship who will
be subject to a change in employment status (transfer or termination). If the individuals
involved in the relationship decline to make this decision, [EMPLOYER NAME] will do so.
Dating Policy Example 2 continued
26. 26
Professionalism:
– Employees are expected to conduct themselves in a professional manner at all times.
[Workplace dating or romantic relationships must not interfere with any employee's
professionalism, including treating others with respect and refraining from behavior that
may make others feel uncomfortable (for example, overt physical displays of affection
and using sexual language).] In particular, management personnel are expected to set a
high standard of professional conduct both at work and in any social setting at events
sponsored by [EMPLOYER NAME]. For this reason, management personnel are
prohibited from social interaction with subordinates that is or might be perceived as
inappropriate (for example, unwanted flirting, touching, or other behavior that may be
regarded as sexual harassment).
Dating Policy Example 2 continued
27. 27
Discretion and Non-Discrimination:
– [EMPLOYER NAME] retains discretion in its enforcement of this policy.
Decisions made under this policy will be made based on operational and
business reasons and without regard to sex, race, color, religion, creed,
age (40 and over), national origin, citizenship, physical or mental disability,
military service or application, [OTHER APPLICABLE PROTECTED
CLASSES FOR RELEVANT STATE(S),] or any other protected
characteristic under federal, state, or local law.
28. 28
Objective:
– [Company Name] strongly believes that a work environment where employees maintain clear
boundaries between employee personal and business interactions is most effective for conducting
business and enhancing productivity. Although this policy does not prevent the development of
friendships or romantic relationships between co-workers, it does establish boundaries as to how
relationships are conducted during working hours and within the working environment.
– Individuals in supervisory or managerial roles, and those with authority over others’ terms and
conditions of employment, are subject to more stringent requirements under this policy due to their
status as role models, their access to sensitive information, and their ability to affect the terms and
conditions of employment of individuals in subordinate positions.
– This policy does not preclude or interfere with the rights of employees protected by the National
Labor Relations Act or any other applicable statute concerning the employment relationship.
Dating Policy Example 3
29. 29
Procedures:
1. During working time and in working areas, employees are expected to conduct themselves in an
appropriate workplace manner that does not interfere with others or with overall productivity.
2. During nonworking time, such as lunches, breaks, and before and after work periods, employees
engaging in personal exchanges in nonwork areas should observe an appropriate workplace
manner to avoid offending other workers or putting others in an uncomfortable position.
3. Employees are strictly prohibited from engaging in physical contact that would in any way be
deemed inappropriate by a reasonable person while anywhere on company premises, whether
during working hours or not.
4. Employees who allow personal relationships with co-workers to adversely affect the work
environment will be subject to the appropriate provisions of [Company Name]’s disciplinary policy,
including counseling for minor problems. Failure to change behavior and maintain expected work
responsibilities is viewed as a serious disciplinary matter.
Dating Policy Example 3 continued
30. 30
Procedures continued:
5. Employee off-duty conduct is generally regarded as private, as long as such conduct does not create problems
within the workplace. An exception to this principle, however, is romantic or sexual relationships between
supervisors and subordinates.
6. Any supervisor, manager, executive or other company official in a sensitive or influential position with
[Company Name] must disclose the existence of a romantic or sexual relationship with another co-worker.
Disclosure may be made to the immediate supervisor or the director of human resources (HR). This disclosure
will enable [Company Name] to determine whether any conflict of interest exists because of the relative
positions of the individuals involved.
7. With regard to Paragraph 6, when a conflict-of-interest problem or potential risk is identified, [Company Name]
will work with the parties involved to consider options for resolving the problem. The initial solution may be to
make sure the parties no longer work together on matters where one is able to influence the other or take
action for the other. Matters such as hiring, firing, promotions, performance management, compensation
decisions and financial transactions are examples of situations that may require reallocation of duties to avoid
any actual or perceived reward or disadvantage. In some cases, other measures may be necessary, such as
transfer to other positions or departments.
Dating Policy Example 3 continued
31. 31
Procedures continued:
8. With regard to Paragraph 6, if one or both parties refuse to accept a reasonable solution or to offer
of alternative position, if available, such refusal will be deemed a voluntary resignation.
9. Failure to cooperate with [Company Name] to resolve a conflict or problem caused by a romantic
or sexual relationship between co-workers or among managers, supervisors or others in positions
of authority over another employee in a mutually agreeable fashion may be deemed
insubordination and cause for immediate termination. The disciplinary policy of [Company Name]
will be followed to ensure fairness and consistency before any such extreme measures are
undertaken.
10.The provisions of this policy apply regardless of the sexual orientation of the parties involved.
11.Where doubts exist as to the specific meaning of the terms used above, employees should make
judgments on the basis of the overall spirit and intent of this policy.
12.Any concerns about the administration of this policy should be addressed to the director of HR.
Dating Policy Example 3 continued
32. 32
EEOC
– Fantastic resource, especially for small businesses
– www.eeoc.gov
– https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/task_force/harassment
Additional Suggested Resource
33. 33
Liz M. Mellem
801.536.6694
amellem@parsonsbehle.com
Thank You
Editor's Notes
Also called “fraternization” or “anti-dating policies” – designed to manage romantic relationships in the workplace
Examples of touchy situations:
-An HR manager knew about an upcoming layoff. Her partner, who worked in another department, knew nothing about it. The HR manager revealed this confidential information, violating an essential condition of her job and potentially undermining trust in the entire HR department.
-Employees complained about feeling unable to have difficult conversations with their boss who was one member of a couple. Though the couple worked in different departments, employees felt that pillow talk was inevitable and they didn’t want their confidential information spreading through the company.
-In a worst-case scenario, one couple let their relationship problems spill into the workplace and fought in front of coworkers.
**It all might go fine, but you need to protect yourself, the company and the other employees if crazy creeps in
2018 CareerBuilder’s Annual Valentine’s Day Survey
36% of workers reported dating a co-worker (down from 41% last year)
1 in 5 men say they have dated someone at work two or more times in their career
Reality is that people are going to date. They spend the most time they have during the week at work, and attractions are inevitable. How to manage that is the key.
Why should you care? It can lead to problems – lack of professionalism, lack of productivity
Key here is that we’re assuming relationship is consensual – anything else is much more dangerous for the employer
When workplace romances sour, it can be an incubator of #MeToo experiences!
Most common legal risk
Prohibited sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act
Most common claim between supervisors and subordinates because of power imbalance risk of 3rd parties feeling ostracized/marginalized
Also situations where affection not reciprocated; 3rd parties take offense to relationship, impact on workplace or potential to create favoritism; relationship ends badly; relationship is adulterous
Technology: flirting inappropriately, sexting, “virtual” or “textual” harassment
PDA: if others observe PDAs that plaintiff then claims were harassing, it’s easier for the plaintiff to prove (witnesses!)
Quid pro quo = something for something
QPQ: job benefit could be promotion, raise, better schedule
QPQ: job detriment could be demotion, pay cut, worse schedule
_employee must show conduct was UNWELCOME and truly consensual relationships do not involve unwelcome conduct
--typically arises after consensual relationship ends and (i) one party continues to demand additional sexual conduct in exchange for employment benefits or (ii) employee suffers tangible employment harm for refusing to submit to the demands
Schrader v. EG&G, Inc. 953 F. Supp 1160 (D. Colo. 1997)
HWE: Derek went over this in first hour
-employer can be vicariously liable for HWE harassment by supervisors and possibly non-supervisors if employer was actually or constructively aware of the harassment
-very fact intensive so, claims generally withstand summary judgment and can create costly litigation expenses
-Examples: repeated and offensive sexual teasing or jokes, pressure for dates or sex, sexual touching, sexually demeaning comments
-BUT, can be a single event if shocking enough
Claim by participant: firing or demotion
- former employee may allege were fired by jilted lover after ending affair
-often come under discrimination/harassment of Title VII but typically rejected if find that unfavorable professional consequence was related to the romance itself (not demands for sexual conduct or P’s gender)
*can be costly because fact intensive = time and money
Claim by 3rd party: supervisor is in romantic relationship with one subordinate and others believe they are disadvantaged
-isolated: single person favoritism generally okay because it discriminates equally against all other employees (regardless of gender, so no gender discrimination); same thing with retaliation for complaining about single favoritism = not discrimination, so retaliation is not unlawful
-coerced/widespread: when supervisor favorites subordinate because of submission to sexual coercion/demands, other employees can claim were injured by coercion and discrimination because were denied job advancement because would not submit to sexual demands (sexual harassment claim if sexual favors are unspoken job requirement)
*general rule: without coercion, a supervisor’s decision to grant or deny employment benefit to subordinate paramour (or spouse or friend) does not constitute illegal sex discrimination or harassment [just plain nepotism]
*but, unwise to tolerate favoritism because it’s hard to police what is “incidental” and what may become actionable
Neg hiring: failing to appropriately screen employees, resulting in harm to others by employee with violent or criminal history
Neg supervision: failing to provide adequate supervision
Neg retention: retaining employee after employer becomes aware that employee could pose risk of harm to employees or others
Complete prohibition is unworkable
We’ll quickly go through each of these in order, leaving policies for the last piece so that we can go through some examples.
Allows employer to easily hand over harassment policy, info re mechanism for reporting claims, and training provided to plaintiff’s lawyer when requested
Drawbacks: can be cumbersome and feel juvenile, can drive relationships underground
But potential risks of not suing outweigh challenges – contract encourages communication and openness between managers, and employees (and provides valuable layer for defending against harassment suits)
Reality is that this is probably more of a “lawyer” thing, but could help in the long run and during litigation
BUT, if any employee refuses to sign one of these (especially when they are the subordinate at work), consider it a RED FLAG and possibly needs investigating (why won’t they sign if the relationship is consensual? Has the subordinate felt pressured during the relationship?)
Beware of balancing company’s need to protect itself from harassment claims with employees’ privacy rights
Whether to use a love contract depends on the employer’s particular culture and their risk aversion for litigation
Performance issues: helps show adverse employment action was because of performance not harassment, romance, or gender
Helps to combat against likely complaint that employee was unable/afraid to report harassment/discrimination
*Ellerth/Faragher defense: primarily defends against hostile work environment sexual harassment claims under certain circumstances employer will argue that it exercised reasonable care to prevent and promptly correct harassing behavior; important if plaintiff unreasonable failed to take advantage of preventative/corrective opportunities provided by employer or to otherwise avoid harm (e.g., not taking advantage of reporting procedures)
-documents will support this
-solid reporting structure will support this
Written acknowledgement: can be signature in employee handbook if policy included there
*note that one consequences of supervisor/subordinate relationship would be transfer to another department (if the two are in the same department) – but be careful when looking to transfer the subordinate because if she’s female, as is often the case, could lead to disparate (and discriminatory) impact on female employees
Having a formal policy doesn’t mean you have to write someone up every time you find out about a casual date. However, you do have to act immediately if productivity is affected, if you get complaints from employees, or gossip and conflict are tearing a department apart.
Pull the two employees aside, preferably together. Some conversation starters might include:
-I’m not comfortable having to bring this up, but your productivity (or your department’s productivity) has dramatically changed, so I feel I must intervene.
-I know your personal life is your own business, but there have been complaints (of favoritism, of public displays of affection, etc.) that must be addressed.
In the #MeToo moment, we’ve heard copious horror stories about men who used sex as a way to manipulate and abuse the women they work with—accusations that ran the horror gamut from bosses who told female employees their dresses weren't "tight enough" to men who showed women photos of their penises at work parties. The possibility for sex to become a weapon used against women is too much of a clear and present danger for companies to leave office relationships unregulated. If there are no clear rules about what constitutes inappropriate behavior, then harassment will flourish.
Focus, here, is on affirmative consent