Essay On Gun Laws

Essay On Gun Laws
Chase Ramsey
Mrs.Servick
English 9
24 April 2016
Gun control laws in America
On December 14, 2012, 28 students and teachers were shot and killed in an elementary school. If the Gun laws in America were stricter, the man who
committed this crime may not have been able to get his hands on a firearm. The gun laws in America are way too lenient. Changing the gun laws to
make it harder to obtain a gun would help protect our country and cause death rates to decrease. The Gun laws today make it incredibly easy to
purchase a gun. At a licensed gun store,all someone has to do is walk in and fill out some paperwork, then wait for a background check to be ran on
themselves.(4). Accorrding to Money.cnn.com this backround check denies less than 1% of people who take it. This means that out of one hundred
million gun buyers only seven hundred thousand people are denied(4). Another way to purchase a gun is through a gun show. Gun shows occur almost
weekly around the U.S. At a gun show, no background check is required to purchase a gun(4). This takes away the one true element of protection we
have from criminals buying guns. Pbs.org says that "almost all guns used in criminal acts enter circulation...show more content...
Between the dates of 1999 and 2013 there were 464,033 gun deaths(2). Guns also were the leading cause of death in homicides and suicides(2).
Making stricter gun laws could prohibit people from owning guns, also making the death rates decrease and prevent homicides and suicide. To
purchase a gun in the future you should have to take a strict background test, take classes to get a license, and give reasons why you need a gun. Also,
the gun show loophole should be taken away, restricting people the right to buy guns at a gunshow without any checks. According to Procon.org, " An
average 200 people go to hospitals every day with gunshot wounds. Stricter gun laws could prevent this from happening in the
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Essay On Gun Laws
The most developed country with the highest amounts of gun related deaths is the United States. This is understandable due to the amount of shootings
that occur in the country ranging from local miniscule headlines to massacres. However the public agrees, the reason for most of these shootings is
due to lack of control on the gun buying process that our government enacted. Governments should have stricter and more controlled gun laws to
diminish the amount of yearly homicides. First, stricter gun laws are beneficial because it limits the amount of damage a shooter can inflict on a
community. The recent shooting in an Orlando gay nightclub which claimed over fifty lives and injured hundreds was enacted with only one shooter.
As due to our...show more content...
A recent example of this was at a night screening of a Hollywood blockbuster where a deranged shooter by the name of James Holmes, who pleaded
for insanity in court, open fired into the crowd of movie goers once again killing many in the process. The reports have concluded that Holmes was
mentally unstable and should have been rejected for getting any type of weapon, unfortunately the sequence of events did not transpire in that fashion.
This is not the only time when the United States failed to uphold the peace of gun violence in the country as in recent history a police officer was
shot and euthanized by a war veteran ailing from PTSD. The reason why he was able to keep his weapon was due to his military service but they did
not take away his weapon due to the fact the government do not check the people that already possess weapons for any mental anomalies. Therefore if
the laws controlled more on owning a firearm then lives like this could have been saved and perhaps gun violence would diminish. The existence of
more controllable and stricter gun laws in the United States can save the lives of many every year. As today, the people allow themselves to buy
weapons that were meant beyond the capabilities of self–protection. Along with the idea that people who own a gun and are psychologically unsound

Gun Laws And Legislation Summary
This week in our reading we focused on Chapter 1 of the SSM 200 course text, Gun Laws and Legislation. While this isn't the most exciting subject to
be reading about it's an area ANYONE in the firearms industry needs to be well educated in. With the current political environment having so many
anti–gun players shaping and forming red tape, violating any laws/regulations can have very serious legal ramifications.
Our course text began by stating that "One of the most difficult issues confronting firearms businesses and firearms owners is the need for fully trained,
competent gunsmiths." The author went on to make a point that "unfortunately, there are many people out there, some of them federal licensees, who
claim to be gunsmiths but have very little knowledge or skills in that area. Gun owners often complain that these people hold their guns for
unreasonable periods of time and, when they finally get them back, the necessary repairs have either been made poorly or not made at...show more
content...
However, these laws are modified frequently." We were also given an explaination of what publications we can utilize to find particular firearms
regulations in order to educate ourselves. Certain terminology was also broken down in a way that was quite easy to understand... One of the more
important thing covered in my mind was the definition of what a prohibited person is. It was stated that a person could be prohibited from owning
firearms for many reasons, including but not limited to Having been convicted in any court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term
exceeding 1 year, Has been adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to a mental institution, Has been discharged from the armed
Forces under dishonorable conditions, and Has been convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence or where the underlying charge was one
of domestic

Persuasive Essay On Gun Laws
Strict gun laws lead to more gun violence and crime in America. Guns are very dangerous and can be used for harmful reasons, but guns can also be
good for America and can be used for protection and safety. These issues are very serious and can be detrimental which leads to the question, should
our nation's gun laws be changed.
Americans have been facing a major crisis for a while, guns. Gun– related crimes have been plaguing America, especially most major cities. Chicago
has the highest murder rate in America, but Chicago has one of the strictest gun laws in America. The reason that so many people are getting killed
in Chicago is because the law abiding citizens who would acquire guns for protection, have a hard time acquiring guns due to Chicago's laws, but the
people who want to use guns for crimes are willing to go to extreme heights to get a gun. Guns will continue to be an issue in America if our current
gun laws are not changed.
Multiple political figures and citizens of America believe that the solution to America's gun issue is to make gun laws more lenient. People believe
that if America increases the amount of guns accessible to the average citizen then America's streets will be safer, and there will be less gun violence.
This fact is backed by Most political figures and citizens who want more guns in America, as they want them for one large reason, self defense. To
support this, author William J Bennett wrote an article supporting the claim that gun laws should

Essay On Anti Gun Laws
With many recent school shootings the question, should gun privileges be taken away, has been raised. Each year an estimated 4.5 million firearms
are sold in the US alone. Around 30,000 deaths occur due to firearms annually. Research from NBC news reveals that 1/2 of the death are between the
age of 18 – 35. A common belief is that if guns are taken away less violence will occur.Gun control will not stop the mass shootings. Most of the
public shootings are committed by people that are mentally ill or are on strong anti depressant medicine. Telling the public to hand over their guns
will not stop the mentally ill from finding one to make a public scene and be heard. Changing the way we view and react to these situations will.
Instead of changing the law to take guns away...show more content...
Most people believe that if guns were seized crime would come to an abrupt halt. This is not the case. Law abiding citizens would indeed hand their
guns over, but criminals and people who plan to do harm with guns would keep them. This would do nothing except give them an advantage. Criminals
would be able to commit more crimes and get away with them. They would have more control of the situation knowing theres nothing the citizen could
do to harm them. Research finds that in most countries where gun control laws have been put in place, they do not have any lower death rates. In
Norway 32% of households have guns, yet they have the lowest murder rate. Guns are a must–have to feel truly safe. Never will gun control stop
violence. Gun control will leave citizens completely dependent on the government. Without being able to rely on yourself for safety we must rely on
the government. The government is trying to take our 2nd amendment right away so we are defenseless, which will give them the power they so
desire. America was not founded to be a communist country, we the people should have say whether we want a gun under our beds or

Essay On Gun Laws
Some people believe that gun laws in the U.S. should be stricter. Should they? Yes, they should... for three reasons: mass shootings, hunting that kills
and wounds too many animals, and accidents. Here are the following arguments. Mass shootings. Did you know that the United States has the most
mass shootings of every country in the world? It's true. In the chart "Civilian Firearms by Country," we see that more people have guns in the US than
anywhere else in the world, including countries like India and China who have a lot more people than the in US. Statista.com says:"Over the past four
decades, no other country as experienced as many mass shootings as the United States." Mexico requires a job letter to get a legal gun. Austria requires
you show extreme physical danger. Several countries require a membership in a shooting club. It is difficult to limit gun use in the US because the
US is one of only three countries where the Constitution lets people own guns. Every state has the right to make its own laws about guns, and there is
no national law about how old one has to be, or what reasons one has to have to own a gun....show more content...
These include the dodo bird, woolly mammoth, several types of tigers, passenger pigeons, american crocodiles (well, maybe not all hunting is bad),
polar bears and muskox. Other more common animals, like deer and bears, are hunted and get wounded but not killed, then die a long, slow and
painful death. In past times, many people who could not afford to buy meat hunted to get meat for their families, but buying basic meat like hamburger
at the store is currently cheaper than bullets for hunting. A bullet for hunting can cost 30 cents, while meat on sale is only $3 per pound or less,
according to ecomass and Walmart. Unless you can guarantee bringing home meat from hunting in ten bullets or less, Walmart is

Informative Essay On Gun Laws
Statistics show that mentally ill people are more likely to commit acts of violence than other people. People who are bullied are 2 to 9 times more
likely to kill themselves with a gun. I was giveing facts of what people who are pro gun control would say. But these things happen because
background checks are not done that tell the gun clerk if the person buying it has a mental issue. The person buying it should also be made to take a
polygraph before being allowed to buy bullets or guns. Families that own guns tell their children what the combination is. So don't tell the children the
combination. There will always be gun violence but just doing these things can reduce the chances of gun violence. I can understand stricter gun laws
but

Essay On Stricter Gun Laws
Should the U.S. impose stricter gun laws to protect our people? Why, or why not?
The U.S. should impose stricter gun laws to protect our students. The enforcement of stricter gun laws will provide parents with peace of mind while
their children are safe and by integrating safety programs in schools. The enforcement of stricter gun laws in schools will also provide security for our
younger generations by implementing the rules and regulations that schools will impose. The enforcement of stricter gun laws will positively affect the
safety and security of every person in our society, allowing the police to make security decisions.
By imposing stricter gun laws, the U.S. Will provide parents with peace of mind by protecting their children while gaining confidence in the safety
programs that schools implement. Gaining confidence in school...show more content...
Teaching our younger generations to respect the rules implemented by police authorities will provide security to our schools. Having safer schools
will allow younger generations be more confident and secured. If young people feel more secure in school, as a result, they will focus more on the
class. As a society, it is our responsibility to teach students to maintain open communication with teachers and parents in order to help keep our schools
safer.
The imposition of stricter gun laws will positively affect the safety of every person in our society, and by allowing the police to make security
decisions for us, for example; in accordance with school safety, 2016 states that; "We must be able to explain to our children that the armed officer in
their school is part of a larger effort to protect them, along with evacuation and disaster drills." (National Rifle Association). Implementing safer ways
to protect our schools and allow security forces to protect our people will help us acquire a safer country for generations to

Guns laws in America are one of the most controversial topics today that are dividing many U.S. citizens. Many people are ignorant to what new gun
laws will enforce and what statistical data shows about gun violence. Future Gun laws will be used to control guns in America, making it restricted to
own and buy weapons. Although some people say that stricter gun laws will protect people more than concealed carry laws, the reality is that
concealed carry laws allow individuals to better defend themselves and their families.
There are many types of gun laws in America, one of the most important is the right to conceal carry. The law states that the, "...bill amends the
federal criminal code to allow a qualified individual to carry a concealed handgun into or possess a concealed handgun in another state that allows
its residents to carry concealed firearms."(public law). The reason this law is so important is it gives the citizen the right to defend his or her self
and family from attackers in public. Many people think that the police will arrive and stop a lone gunman but the truth is that, "The only thing that
stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun,''( LaPierre) said Wayne LaPierre, a top executive at the NRA. Although some people say guns
laws help America recent studies find that gun laws actually do nothing to help stop the flow of buying, selling, and carrying guns.
Many people think that gun control laws pushed by the Democratic Party will help reduce the amount of guns bought, this a very big misconception.
The gun laws that are in effect now require a background check and age requirement, but according to Junior Scholastic there are,"major holes in it.
Perhaps the biggest is that many small–scale sellers, who claim to be "hobbyists," aren't required to conduct background checks" this example shows
that nearly anyone can buy a gun and do not have to have a background check. Another reason why gun control does not work is that,"A criminal could
also resort to a method other than a firearm"(NRA). Before this great country was created men used swords, axes, daggers, bows and many other types
of weapons to inflict terror, murder, and other horrid acts. The guns and other weapons are not what kill

How Do Gun Laws Affect Society
If the United States of America were to make the right to bear arms and legally own guns it would have a negative effect on society. By getting rid of
ways to legally obtain guns and ammo it would increase the amount black market gun sales. Culturally in the United States we want the items were told
we cannot have taking away guns would only fuel the desire to obtain numerous amounts of guns. We have already tried this type of method back in
history and it wasn't successful the prohibition in the United States was a nationwide ban on the production, importation and transportation and sale of
alcoholic beverages (History). When this law was in place it didn't stop individuals from consuming alcohol, they proceeded to drink illegally in unsafe
...show more content...
If we were to make owning a gun illegal in today's society it would have the same negative side effects but with an object that can be misused and
deadly quickly. Just like Al Capone gang leaders would take control of what would become the gun black market putting communities at risks for
violence and increases in homicides individuals who follow the laws would be forced with the unknown every day. Law enforcement wouldn't have
the upper hand anymore and wouldn't be seen as an intimidation factor anymore. Police officers would no longer be a threat to gang leaders. If law
enforcement was no longer seen as a threat there wouldn't be a way to protect citizens from harm's way the leaders that would be controlling gun
sales would be individuals that no longer see law enforcement as a threat to them. This would start gang rivalries just like it did in the prohibition.
Communities would be facing new fears of gang leaders and increased criminal activities. If the country put out new laws involving gun control it
would only affect the law abiding citizens that have guns or want

Argumentative Essay On Gun Laws
On December 14th, 2012, a renewed debate concerning The United States' gun laws sparked after the deadliest mass shooting at the high school age
and the second deadliest mass shooting by an individual occurred. Twenty–year–old Adam Lanza stormed into Sandy Hook Elementary school armed
and motivated. Although his motive is still unknown to this day he must have had a legitimate reason to relentlessly shoot and kill twenty children and
six members of the staff. Before entering the school, Lanza returned to his childhood home and murdered his mother. After much speculation, the
American Justice System deemed Lanza mentally unstable, a common theme in mass murder trials. I believe that in order to prevent any more grueling
tragedies, The United States must change the current gun...show more content...
Out of the 1,289 adults polled, merely 8% voted that the laws should be less strict. That means about 100 people in that group believe that the laws are
currently too strict. From Columbine in 1999 to one of the more recent tragedies at Sandy Hook in 2012 the anti–gun activists have been trying to
protect the citizens of America by changing gun laws. On the other side of the debate, pro–gun activists argue four main points: mental illness causes
gun violence, psychiatric diagnosis can predict gun crime before it happens, US mass shootings teach us to fear mentally ill loners, and due to of the
complex psychiatric histories of mass shooters, gun control "won't prevent" another mass slaughter. What this group of people is arguing is that
whenever you see a person with mental disabilities, you must automatically stereotype them as a mass murderer. These pro–gun activists believe that
by providing an entire nation with psychiatric help will completely eliminate gun violence. Instead of curing the problem, they are attempting to cure
the people. What needs to happen is the laws regarding who is eligible to carry firearms must

December 15, 1791, the day America's Bill of Rights was ratified, was the day the initial infrastructure for our country's basic rights were established.
Since then, firearms have been a highly deliberated topic. Even today, the debate over whether we, as a country, should institute stricter gun laws
continues to be an ongoing conversation throughout social media, the press, and within our governing bodies. But, since the approval of the Bill of
Rights, gun laws have continued to be restricted in order to protect the lives of citizens who reside in America. The initial catalyst for more rigid gun
laws was the horrific assassination attempt of Ronald Reagan, which also brought injury upon James Brady who, due to this incident, later became an
advocate for gun laws. Ronald Reagan's potential rendezvous with bloodshed brought about the initiation of Brady's law as a safeguard to prevent
another incident of this kind from besieging our country.
A big factor lending itself to the gun laws of today's age started with the attempted assassination of Ronald Reagan. On March 31, 1981 there was an act
of mutiny against the president. "John Hinckley, Jr. shoots President Ronald Reagan outside the Hilton Hotel in Washington D.C. just after the
president had addressed the Building and Construction Workers Union of the AFL–CIO" (Ronald Reagan shot by John). Hinckley was one of the men
standing among the crowd of onlookers and reporters, watching and waiting for the precise moment to

Essay on Firearms and Weapons
Firearms are the weapons of choice for people who decide to use them for protection. Unfortunately, they are also the weapon of choice for criminals.
Since firearms are easy for criminals to steal, firearms are readily available on the black market; this makes firearms the prime tool for criminals. Most
crimes involving firearms are committed with the use of a handgun; this is a serious problem in America today. Somegun control supporters believe
that restricting firearms is the best way to protect citizens. However, restricting firearms fails to protect people because the laws are not effective,
restricting firearms prevents people from an effective means of self–defense, and the laws do not solve the actual problem, which is the owner of
firearms.
The restriction on firearms is an ineffective way to protect citizens. There are some cities that have employed firearm bans in the past, and the results
were very poor. On September 24, 1976, Washington, D.C. enacted a ban on handguns, the ban was later cancelled on June 26, 2008. Under this
regulation, no one could possess firearms except police officers. Evidently, restricting firearms in D.C. had little effect on reducing the amount of
crimes committed, and the number of murders actually increased by a great deal. Supporters of firearm control would argue this information by
saying that the data is one sided , and that it is necessary to take into account other factors such as the rise of drug and gang violence.

Argumentative Essay: Gun Laws
A law that interest me is gun laws. I believe as with the constitutional party on the 2nd amendment the right to keep and bear arms, to be able to protect
ones self and family. Quote, "We repeat that when guns are illegal, only makes illegal will have them. In such facts or conditions that surround
someone, the peaceful citizen's protection against the criminal would be seriously endanged." Also with the Libertarians, that want "the right of self
defense, as studies show where gun ownership is illegal, residential crimes are higher." Quote, "a man with a gun in his home is no threat to you if you
aren't breaking into it."

Essay On Stricter Gun Laws
I believe that we as Americans should not have stricter gun laws. When the majority of people decide to enact stronger gun control laws, they take
power away from law abiding citizens and giving more power to criminals. Guns and the right to form militias, are our right as American people and
they always have been. Guns are what built this country what it is, without guns we would still be thirteen colonies ruled by the British. So many
things in america are protected by guns. Stricter gun laws will take away our rights, and stronger gun laws will not be addressing our country's
problems, which is people.
Guns are our right to own, use, and buy. "A well regulated Militia...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"– second
amendment of the Constitution of the United States that is what our founding fathers said 229 years ago. The right to own guns is so important that it
is the second amendment, and it should be kept that way for our protection. Without guns we cannot form a well regulated militia. We as Americans
have the ability to form militias to protect, and secure our free state. If we cannot protect our state, then who keep us content and safe....show more
content...
Without guns we cannot protect our people, and this country; when we look in history we find guns at base of it all. When we look to the
revolutionary war, in order to separate from the British and become our own nation, we needed guns to fight for our life, liberty, and pursuit of
happiness. During both world wars we as americans wanted the wars to end, so we together put forth the effort to stop those wars. We have always
fought for our life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness anyone that has tried to infringe on that we stopped the enemy. No enemy has successfully
infringed on our rights, lets keep it that way, our politicians can be our enemies if we make them our

Essay on Gun Control in Canada
Gun Control in Canada
Gun Control is an important issue to Canadians. Canada has both provincial and federal legislation that restricts the sale, purchase, and use of
different kinds of firearms. The United States, on the other hand, do not have federal or state bills restricting the possession or use of firearms, only
local laws exist there. A firearm consists of any barreled weapon from which a shot, bullet or other missile can be fired and that is capable of causing
serious bodily harm or death.
Society's concerns about protection from violent crimes involving firearms have encouraged Canadian Parliament to pass tougher gun control legislation
. The Federal Government responded by passing Bill C–68 that created the Firearms Act,...show more content...
In 1892 was the first government step in licensing firearms. A basic permit for pistols was introduced in the Criminal Code. In 1913 it became a
criminal offence to sell or distribute firearms to anyone under 16 years old. Government finally recognized that children should not have possession of
a firearm. Until 1934 firearm registration was rarely an enforced offence. The Royal Canadian Mounted Police kept records of those purchasing
firearms. Handguns had to be re–registered every five years starting in 1939.
It also became an offence to alter the serial numbers on guns as records were kept and gun transactions were being monitored. 1951 was the next step in
gun control legislation having automatic fire guns added to the list of firearms that were to be registered. A list to categorize firearms as 'restricted
weapons' and 'prohibited weapons' was created in 1968 ("History of Firearms", 2000). By this time police were become allowed to search and seize
firearms with a judge issued warrant or if they had reasonable grounds that the safety of the public was at stake. On August 5, 1977 Bill C–51 was
given royal assent. This bill imposed stricter penalties for those convicted of an indictable offence where a firearm had been used. Bill C–51 also
created the requirement of a Firearms Acquisition Certificate (FAC) to properly screen those purchasing guns and to keep records of firearms
purchased. A FAC had to be renewed

Essay on America Needs Stricter Gun Control Laws
Gun control has become more of a hot topic in recent years. Some believe that there is no need for additional gun control. On the other hand, we have
some that believe that the government can improve gun laws. Although many believe that gun control will violate their rights, the idea of stricter gun
control laws can help communities. We live in very violent times. There are daily accounts reported in the media about shootings. We do well to ask,
Is there a solution to this growing crisis? Yes! It is call gun control. The lack of stricter gun control has damaged our communities. How so? Well, in
order to answer that question, first we have to understand what makes up a community. Then we will explore the history of our gun control laws....show
more content...
Many people are familiar with the second amendment. However, this amendment has been interpreted many different ways to fit the wants of this
society. It has been used and several times by the Supreme Court and politicians. But we need to examine the second amendment closely. Many
people fail to mention or read the small print. The second amendment was ratified in 1791. The second amendment states: A well regulated Militia,
being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed This has been distorted so many
ways. This amendment is also dated. We have to keep in mind that our society has changed since this amendment has been written. This was made
around the time of the Revolutionary War. During that time all males' citizens were required to own guns because they were fighting against the
British forces. Virginia has the best interpretation of the second amendment. Before the Declaration of Independence, Virginia was the first colony to
adopt a state constitution. They stated that the second amendment as follows: A well regulated Militia, composed of the body of the people trained to
arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state Today there is no need to protect ourselves from government take over. We handed them
ourselves our lives our education. They control the way we live and raise our children among a lot of other things weather we agree with their input or
not. There

Gun Laws Essay
Gun Regulations in Estonia and Belarus Belarus and Estonia's laws were individually crafted based on each nation's Constitution. Their laws were
enacted right after their separation and freedom from the former Soviet Union. As the time goes by, each country was able to create their respective gun
laws, which are based on their current needs and situation of the country. Each country aimed to create a government that enforces the laws of the land,
which will strengthen their sovereignty as independent countries. Estonia, for example, enacted "The Weapons Act" in 2001 that establishes legal
procedures in relation to ammunition and hand handling (Riigi Teataja n.p.). This law covers the granting of permission for ammunition andweapon,
which are intended for civilian use. According to the law's general provisions, the weapons of the civilians must only be used for specific purposes,
such as engagement in sports, hunting, and for ensuring personal safety. Personal safety could be the most important reason for some Estonians, as to
why they opt to own a gun at home. However, the law has certain provisions that regulate the classifications of guns that private individuals can own.
Civilians are not allowed to own a firearm...show more content...
As the changing security situation happens in most post–Soviet nations, Estonian government introduced a Bill that will reevaluate the current gun law
of the country. This is due to various factors, such as the migration crisis in Europe, the threat of terror attacks, and even the sanctions that were
applied to Russia. The amending law generally states that firearms are sources of danger against the public and that gun ownership must only be
allowed based on the people's needs. It was noted that the more guns being allowed to be used by the public means that there is a higher chance that
they might be stolen, lost, and end up in the trafficking of illegal

Since the founding days American gun laws have been used as a part of some American lifestyles. When the founding fathers wrote amendment 2 of
the United States Constitution, guns were not as technologically as advanced as they are now. Giving all United States Citizens the right to bear arms
seemed like a fair idea when guns fired 1–2 rounds per minute; but today some gun fire up to 900 rounds per minute and can cause severe damage.
Gun law restrictions has been a constant topic of discussion amongst legislators and citizens over the past 5 years. America should impose more
restrictive gun laws because they pose a serious threat to safety of Americans.
Mass Shootings have increased in America over the past 20 years. Innocent bystanders and civilians are the victims of a shooting rampage caused by
one or more suspects. On October 1, 2017 in Las Vegas, Nevada a man by the name of the of Stephen Paddock opened fire on concertgoers at the
Route 91 Harvest. He fired thousands of rounds in just a matter of minutes using high powered advanced tech military grade weapons. After the
shooting the uproar about the ability to purchase such high–powered weapons arose again and citizens called for gun laws to be revised. The
semi–automatic weapons can now be altered to function as a fully automatic weapon. Assault rifles should only be permitted for the use in war combat
only. Non–military personnel should have the right to own an assault rifle. In an article titled "Disarming the

Essay On Gun Laws

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Paper Writing Help Wise

More from Paper Writing Help Wise (11)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Essay On Gun Laws