Military Leadership Styles And Philosophies

Military Leadership Styles And Philosophies
All organizations, whether governmental, corporate, or private, have structures with leadership positions at various levels and different leadership
philosophies. However, the military is an organization that differs from the rest of them, because of the specific mission and complex scenario.
Therefore, military leadership styles and philosophies are very different from all other kinds, and are far more special. There is no leadership
position outside of the military that deals with handling hard decisions and the motivation of people for activities that may require them make the
ultimate sacrifice for a greater good. Thus, to be a military leader means to have special devotion and dedication for taking care of your followers, while
...show more content...
Moreover, a true leader must not allow the unconscious transfer of their focus from the people to themselves, by fixating on their career, ego, and
personal success. A lack of emotional intelligence may bring a toxic environment into the unit, which is not a trait of a good leader. Furthermore, by
focusing on themselves, a leader fails to accomplish a basic principle of a good leadership, which is to care for the people, because they are the
milestone of a true leader's success. Taking care of the people by applying a high degree of emotional intelligence, which includes self–awareness,
self–regulation, motivation, empathy, and social skill, irrefutably distinguish a true, successful, and effective leader from all others. A true, successful
leader will incorporate emotional intelligence in their leadership philosophy in order to create long–term strong and successful teams that will be
motivated to follow and complete the mission regardless of the circumstances. Applying emotional intelligence in relationships within the organization,
through the five domains, will continue to further develop emotional intelligence awareness, thereby enhancing the capabilities to create flexibility in
their leadership style to be able to cope with any situation or event that may ask for the whole team's commitment and sacrifice.
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Army Leadership Levels
"Leadership is the process of influencing people by providing purpose, direction, and motivation to accomplish the mission and improve the
organization" (Mills, 2013). The Army measures its leaders by their attributes and their core leader competencies. Also, a leader must be able to train,
coach and mentor their subordinates. Additionally, the Army has three levels of leadership: Direct, Organizational, and Strategic. An effective leader
understands and practices these qualities at an operational level. Leader Attributes are measured by their character, presence, and intellect. Character is
defined by living the Army Values, Warrior Ethos, and discipline. Presence is a leader's ability to demonstrate military and professional bearing, fitness,
This is face to face leadership and influences the organization indirectly through their subordinates. Direct level leaders monitor and coordinate team
efforts, provide clear and concise mission intent, and set expectations for performance. Direct level leadership influences can span from a few people
to a few dozen people. Organizational leadership happens on a broader spectrum. Leaders at this level establish policies and effect the climate that
supports their subordinate leaders. The addition of subordinates can often make it difficult for them to see and judge immediate results. Their planning
and focus usually ranges from two to ten years. They must establish a long–term vision for their organization and enable their subordinates to
accomplish their mission while abiding by their core leader competencies. Strategic level leadership is the highest level. They are responsible for large
organizations and prepare their commands and the Anny for future roles. Strategic leaders apply all of their core leader competencies they acquire as
direct and organizational leaders, and adapt them to more complex realities of their strategic environment. They are responsible for new systems
acquisition, programs, research, and

Military Leadership
What does leadership really means to you? There have been many theories about leadership and its styles, based among the relationships between
human beings in which one or more persons exert a degree of influence that can lead others to conquer a common goal. It doesn't matter what they say
about leadership what really matter is how you see yourself as a leader, what impact have you left in your men, is it positive? Is it negative? What is
your commander's opinion about you? Have you thought about that before? Many questions to answer, don't they? As military leaders and guidance for
soldiers, we must demonstrate: endurance of character, competence, commitment, courage, patriotism, honor, wisdom, justice, integrity, faith, charisma,
high standards of communication, discernment, generosity, initiative, listening, passion, positive attitude, high standards for problem–decision making,
responsibility, security, self–discipline, dedication to service, be open to criticism and continuous improvement and many more. No matter...show more
content...
Besides that, soldiers should spend most of the time training for war because every military conflict requires more prepared soldiers and leaders to
assume combat responsibilities. In my judgment, combat leadership probably represents the greatest leadership challenge for any leader, because
we have to execute the mission while ensuring our soldier's welfare, morale and their lives. To manage this risk and emerge victoriously is what
makes a true leader because our soldiers are our team, our family on the battlefield. it does not mean that we can only be combat leaders. We must be
able to lead our troops wherever we are, in any circumstance; we should assume the leader's role at any

Military Leadership Role
While enlisted in the military I was in charge of several firemen within my work center. I ensured they arrived to work on time and completed daily
tasks. Most people would consider this position as a leadership role. However, I viewed it as more time management and personnel management. My
most influential role occurred once I exited the military. I worked as an assistant boxing coach for at–risk youth. My specific job requirements were to
teach basic boxing fundamentals and exercise programming. Nonetheless, I took it upon myself to incorporate goal setting. Most of them would set
their goal to win a certain championship or to achieve a knockout in their next fight. Since our control of the outcome is rather limited, I encouraged
children

Military Leadership
Within the U.S. military, leadership is generally considered something of a given. It is a fundamental ingredient of warfare, without which the outcome
of a combat operation cannot be assured. The leader is the brain, the motive power of command, upon whom subordinates rely for guidance and
wisdom, and depend upon for good judgment. The leader must be determined, unflappable and charismatic; confident in delegation of authority; able to
combine the various strands of command into a common thread; seasoned, intelligent, and thoughtful.
When judging the qualities of leadership, there is a tendency to think of the gifted, or natural leader, involving some expectation that leadership is an
inherent personality quality that some have, and...show more content...
Army Staff College, and the Naval War College. Historical examples ofmilitary success and failure featured prominently in their curricula, on the
assumption that trialвЂђandвЂђerror under combat conditions was a poor method of inculcating leadership skills. Lessons learned in the classroom
were then effected in map and field exercises. The expectation was, and still is, that nonвЂђcombat training would provide a fund of practical
knowledge upon which a commander could use as a point of departure under battlefield conditions.
For the educational reformers, emulation was key, although they admitted that talent was also valuable. Raw talent, however, was no substitute for its
disciplined application. Considering the growing complexity and lethality of war, education was regarded as the surest means of directing talent
toward the desired end. Yet the question of native ability remained; could those without it become effective leaders? A problem reformers grappled
with was the difference between leadership and command; they are not the same thing, for not all commanders are good leaders, and not all leaders
are good commanders. During the Civil War, Gen. George McClellan, for example, was a truly inspirational leader who won the total devotion of his
troops, yet consistently failed to achieve decisive victory in battle. Gen. Ulysses S. Grant, on the other hand, was an excellent commander, to whom
few would

Military Leadership Essay
From Combat to Cubicle: Examining Post–9/11 Combat Veterans Transitioning to Private Sector Leadership Positions After becoming involved with
several organizations serving the Post–9/11 Combat Veteran population, I have become increasingly aware of fellow veterans' desires to continue to
lead upon returning from the battlefield. After numerous deployments in support of multiple campaigns, these men and women transition from the
military with valuable leadership training and experience that the private sector can benefit from. This skill set of leadership intangibles, including
strategic personnel management, adaptability, and problem solving, are simply too expensive and time consuming for most tightly budgeted
organizations to properly train...show more content...
There are three styles of leadership in particular that are applicable to the military leader; Transactional, Transformational, and Servant. Transactional
leaders in a military environment pursue outcomes that are mutually rewarding by providing concise instructions and holding subordinates accountable
for their actions. This leadership style eliminates assumptions and allows for subordinates to react rapidly and effectively, which is highly desirable in
the chain of command work structure implemented by all military organizations. Key characteristics of the transformational leader are their ability to
develop esprit–de–corps and to recognize the talents inherently in their subordinates and to cultivate those talents to enable their organization to
succeed. Servant leadership is the converse of leadership in much of corporate America and the style I believe can be most effective in aiding private
sector organizations in maintaining high employee retention rates. Servant leaders are selfless and seek to invest in the people they lead by genuinely
caring about them and their

Military Leadership Development
Abstract Leadership development in the military is critical to its mission and objectives. Understanding and embracing leadership will foster an agile
culture and facilitate attainment of strategic goals. People desire quality leadership to assist with achieving their goals, albeit personal or professional
development. Having a clear vision and the motivation to perform at high–levels influences others to work synergistically together to achieve
organizational goals. Insomuch, employees value being treated respectfully, fairly, and ethically. Leaders serve people best when they help them
develop their own initiative and good judgment, enable them to grow, and help them become better contributors. Military Leadership Development For
the next 10–15 years, leadership development is critical within the military. Training to develop agile leaders will yield a competitive advantage within
both private and public organizations. Importantly, leadership training should mirror as if one would fight in the new Era International Security
Environment. Such tenacity will confront limited engagements in the next 10 years, plus a great deal of offensive operations in the 15 years.
Therefore, trained leaders are flexible to their changing missions, roles, and responsibilities, thus are more adaptive to compelling new conflicts.
Leadership Development Program Many leaders rely on their technical skills, functional knowledge, and energy to achieve results and have not
mastered core

Army Leader: Characteristics of LDRSHIP Essay
The Army's definition of leadership is "the process of influencing people by providing purpose, direction and motivation while operating to
accomplish the mission and improving the organization." An army leader is anyone who inspires and influences people to accomplish their goals.
Leaders motivate people both inside and outside the army to help them pursue their goals, focus thinking, and shape decisions for the better of the
army. Leadership can be acquired by anyone as long as they have the self–determination to do so. The main principles of leadership in the army are
broken down in to the acronym LDRSHIP (loyalty, duty, respect, selfless service, honor, integrity, personal courage), characteristics the army aims to
instilled in each...show more content...
Situational leadership theory is when a leader adapt's to the situation and the management styles to the behavioral needs of the individual or group.
Trait approach leadership gives more credence to the qualities and traits that people are born with that make them natural born leaders. Officers are
taught to lead by example which means learning from the officers who came before them. As a leader in the army, a solider is constantly watched
and must uphold the army core values at all times. Setting a good example for the young, non commissioned officers (NCOs) in the battalion is
vital to the battalions cohesion and morale. In order to lead by example an officer is taught different leadership styles to incorporate in the field For
instance, participating leadership style is especially appropriate when there is time receive input, information, and recommendations of your
subordinates. The primary goal of the army is to develop the leaders of tomorrow. Leadership can always be improved on throughout life. At the end
of the day, a true leader "in the army will do these three things live by the army core values, know the warrior ethos, and lead by example"–MSI
textbook. Leaders both in and out of the army are held to a higher standard holding themselves in a professional manner at all times. The success of
the group is attributed to the leadership styles and core values instilled in the solider to do his job effectively. General Eisenhower once

Military Leadership Examples
The most dominant tenant of military leadership is to "lead by example." What people fail to realize, however, is that everyone leads by example.
Some people tend to lead by a good example, and some people tend to lead by a bad example. I firmly believe that the first "leadership example"
you get as a cadet has the ability to shape your future experiences and contributions. Be it one semester of having a great instructor, or three years of
having a phenomenal tactical officer (TAC), I would argue that the rate of return on cadet output with a positive experience is tenfold that of a
negative experience. My TAC of Company C–2, Major (Promotable) Nicole Ussery was that positive experience for me at school. MAJ Ussery is a
female Military

Military Leadership
A successful leader is the one who gets the job done the right way. True leadership occur when people engage each other in a way that the leaders
and followers achieve the highest level of motivation and take an organization to new heights. In my opinion, building a relationship with
subordinates, leading from the front and adaptability are a few qualities essential for the success of a leader. I believe that a good military leader
builds a relationship with his followers who feel motivated by it and work diligently to get the job done. This is achieved by a leader who make
conscientious efforts to gain thorough knowledge of his personnel background, habits, strengths and weaknesses. A leader who develops an
understanding about how his men react under various conditions will employ them successfully. Personnel desire to satisfy their physical, mental and
spiritual needs form the basis of their...show more content...
In a military organization personnel emulate their leaders and the leader who leads from the front influence his personnel by displaying professional
competency and attracts their confidence and respect. This brings forth a desire in his subordinates to match or even surpass the standards set by him
and generates a healthy competition within the unit. By doing so the leader becomes a part of the group, understands the culture prevalent in the
organization and if necessary transforms it to further enhance efficiency. The more difficult the situation, greater will be the need for a leader to
inspire his men by displaying personal leadership qualities. A good leader will remain visible when things are going wrong and invisible when they
are going well. On the contrary, a leader who shies away from setting a personal example of leading from the front does not enjoy the respect of his
subordinates that significantly reduces their

Military Leadership Research Paper
– Introduction
a.Definition of Military Leadership
b.Significance of the study of Military Leadership
c.Definition of Terms
– Body
a.History of leadership in the military
b.Different theories and styles of leadership
c.Leadership skills
d.Leadership of the future in the military.
– Conclusion
a.Concluding Statement

Military Leadership Philosophy Paper
Throughout my life and my military career I have experienced various leadership styles, from civilian employers to military Officers and
Non–Commissioned officers alike. Each had their own approach to leadership, some I found to be effective and others I did not. I have attempted
to create a leadership philosophy based on a fusion of the leaders I have encountered and my own personal experiences. Trust would be the first
component of my leadership philosophy, if subordinates do not trust you they will not follow you. This commodity is earned not given, as a leader
you must first prove that you are trustworthy before subordinates will follow. Second, you should prove yourself to be knowledgeable in your field.
Having a learned knowledge

Military Leadership
combine the various strands of command into a common thread; seasoned, intelligent, and thoughtful. When judging the qualities of leadership, there is
a tendency to think of the gifted, or natural leader, involving some expectation that leadership is an inherent personality quality that some have, and
Testing and promotion review replace the combat situation, while leadership itself becomes genuine military doctrine. The guiding assumption of
leadership doctrine is that incapable practitioners will be winnowed out before their mediocrity costs lives in battle. Battle represents the severest test of
a commander's mastery of leadership doctrine, for the commander must stimulate subordinates to do things that would imperil their health, even cost
them their lives. It is here that the leadership role diverges from the command role. Command merely vests the leader with authority to define and order
the accomplishment of an objective. Achieving it requires the additional influence of leadership. Ideally, the leader sets the standard for command
through personal example and shared sacrifice. He must, therefore, demonstrate confidence in the troops and in his own abilities, while acknowledging
the risks his decisions may entail. If subordinates trust the leader's judgment and abilities, and believe that he would not unnecessarily expose them to
danger, his authority and decisions will not be questioned. Under the stress of combat, however, a leader cannot assume instant obedience. Fear and the
instinct for selfвЂђpreservation are powerful disincentives to any dangerous enterprise, and the commander cannot simply will them

Military Leadership
Military leadership theory brings forth the discovery of many ideas regarding the application of knowledge from a military background in a business
environment. Much information was premised on business owners, managers and employees working collectively, how to improve communication
skills, and how to define a goal and motivate others to follow it based on military leadership. The connection between these two worlds of business
and military is apparent. Many of today's companies derive their structure and leadership model from that which is applied in the army. The military
typically has a main leader or a decision maker, who transmits orders to subordinates at lower levels. This model is almost identical to what is seen in
many...show more content...
There are plenty of people who possess the personality traits associated with leadership, yet many of these people never seek out positions of
leadership (Wheeler, 2000). Behavioral Theory This theory is based on the idea that a person is not born a leader, but that a person becomes a leader
through self–development and learning. It focuses not on mental qualities or internal states, but on the actions and behaviors of leaders. According to
this theory, people can learn to become leaders through teaching and observation (Wheeler, 2000). One can conclude that it is the converse of the Great
Man theory. Contingency Theory According to this theory, there is not a leadership style that would be best in all situations. Contingency theory of
leadership focuses on particular variables related to the environment that might determine which particular style of leadership is best suited for the
situation. If the leader is highly effective in one situation, he or she may not necessarily be effective in another. Success depends upon a number of
variables, including qualities of the followers, the leadership style or aspects of the situation (Wheeler, 2000). Situational Theory This theory states that
situational factors, rather than skills of leader, determine the effectiveness of leadership. Situational theories propose that leaders choose the best course
of action based upon situational variables. Different styles of leadership are needed

The leadership in our military is quite astonishing. Within this project, we will be looking at different strategies that has helped ensure military
leadership is top notch. Without great leadership, there would be chaos and corruption in a company. Not only will we look at the United States and
their tactics on military leadership, but also some viewpoints worldwide. The highly disciplined military leadership styles are a great reflection of true
leadership and can be used in the civilian workplace. This paper will reflect on how any company can exceed in their leadership capabilities by
learning from successful military leaders. With their expertise, we shall use their guidelines on obtaining an outstanding leadership roles in businesses.
Keywords: Military Leadership
Military Leadership
According to the Encyclopedia the definition of military leadership is:
combine the various strands of command into a common thread; seasoned, intelligent, and thoughtful. (Oxford, 2000).
Let us first start with how military leadership is

1. I believe a true leader, leads from the front. A leader is the first in all, showing the way, setting an example to all. A leader is trustworthy, loyal
and approachable. A leader will support policy and always do what is right. A leader is look up too and promotes motivation. A leader will take
care of his crew, from his most subordinate to his commander. A leader knows when to allow others help. I would follow this leader and I wish to
be this leader. 2. In the Army we are trained as future leaders to lead from the front, set an example for others, and take care of your people. We
ensured our guys ate first, slept first, what ever it was, I allowed my guys first. We trained as a team and put trust in each other because if have too,
we would count on each other in battle. I trusted my squad leaders and platoon sergeants, as I was trusted when I became a squad leader. Lucky for
me, I had great NCOs and officers who looked out for us. They we're good mentors and pushed us...show more content...
This was my ship's clement. It felt like it was every non–rate for them selves, with petty officer, chiefs and officers on a high horse. There was no
motivation or spirit being instilled is us and I knew this was wrong. Even thou it seem mostly negative, they where good shipmates who helped
train us and seem to care. My time on the ship was short but I used it as a learning moment for myself. I knew then that if I was ever put into
leadership position, that I would use what I learned in the Army and my experience from the ship to create my personal leadership style. My
philosophy since then has been, 'take care of your people and the will take care of you'. I ensured that no one was afraid of me and that I'm
approachable. I ensured that I pulled more duty than those in my duty section. Often I sacrifice my fun so that others can enjoy themselves. I have
always been a good listener, even when they are just whining because some times that all it takes to fix

Army Leadership Style Essay
Every leader in the U.S. Army have a different leadership style. During my thirteen years in the Army I have seen several leaders placed in
positions where it was obvious that they were born for that position, performing admirably and making very real contributions. In other situations
leaders were placed in positions of leadership appearing unprepared for the role. These leaders over time were soon surrounded by other leaders that
ensured their success. Several leaders in my career have left a lifelong mark on my leadership style. Every one of them left me with knowledge that
have built a foundation for my leadership beliefs and style. There is also what we call in the Army, "toxic leadership" which produce harm to the
organization, leaders

How To Be A Military Leader Essay
Leadership is defined as the ability to accomplish a set goal(s) due to the act of inspiring and motivating a group of your peers. Former United States
president Dwight D. Eisenhower made famous a quote that stated, "Leadership consists of nothing but taking responsibility for everything that goes
wrong and giving your subordinates credit for everything that goes well." (Notable–quotes.com). One of the most important aspects of the work area is
leadership. Without leadership, there will be no guidance to for teamwork and the percentage of successful goal will be slim to none. Becoming a
great leader is no easy feat however. An exceptional leader must lock in on specific attributes such as intellect, moral character, and human...show more
content...
The warning order must also follow the guidelines of the five paragraph OPORD format. A warning issue may include what the mission consists
of, coordinating instructions, deadline, and who is all responsible for seeing this task is seen through. Which brings us to our final step of leader's
responsibilities: make a tentative plan. This is what really separates the boys from the men. Up until now, it was merely receiving orders of what
to do and who is a part of the plan. Step 3 is all about the plan for mission essentials, analysis, specific and implied tasks, and a restated mission
report. The responsibility for this step is something not for the weak minded as no situation is the same. Throughout history our country has had
many leaders. Whether you're the leader of a business, military platoon, or the leader of our great nation you were withheld with the honor and
trust to govern the actions and best interests of fellow Americans. But just because you have achieved the title of a leader does not by default make
you a good leader. A good leader is a person who has risen above and beyond to show cooperation, perseverance, and respect to decisions made by
those still above you at one point in time. "As a seasoned member of the military, you've risen through the ranks because you understood your mission
and performed your duties with distinction. At this stage of your career, your most important contribution may be how well you take care of the service
members and

Military Leadership Philosophy
A concise, well thought out leadership philosophy will assist a leader in improving an organization. My leadership philosophy statement is; if you
develop a vision, believe in and support all the people within your organization, then they will propel the organization to do amazing things. My
philosophy has evolved over time and was developed mainly from past experiences and enhanced through formal education programs and personal
reflection. Within the military organizations that I have served, I've experience that most people want to do the right thing and make positive
contributions to an organization as long as the leaders within that organization provide a vision of where they want the organization to go, show that
they truly care about...show more content...
I believe that I would have made many of the same decisions with only a few changes if I were faced with the same challenges. Both the commander
and I have a tendency to emphasize people focused behaviors which "include developing a positive climate, facilitating team member participation in
the group...and being friendly and supportive."1 We both agree that a vision is necessary for the organization which was accomplished when the
commander created the commanders tenants. My leadership philosophy believes in and support all members of the organization. The commander
brought underutilized/marginalized members back into the organization and spoke with all ranks within the organization to get their input on the
health of the squadron for squadron improvements. I was very impressed with the way the commander viewed the type of person he wanted in the
CEM; an individual with a differing viewpoint that can assist in making better decisions. One decision that I would've made that differed from the
commander were keeping a first–sergeant that I did not have a good relationship with. As Lt Col Jeffry Smith states, the first–sergeant is the "most
important informal leader of your squadron."1 If I were to have a conflict with my first–sergeant, which I could not resolve, and it brought

Military Leadership Styles And Philosophies

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Military Leadership Styles And Philosophies

Similar to Military Leadership Styles And Philosophies (12)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Military Leadership Styles And Philosophies