3. Problem statements
1. Funds from Multilateral
funding agencies are
misused.
2. Corruption and mis-
governance is root-cause
of hunger, poverty,
diseases and
unemployment in the
world.
4. Draft Framework
People Process Technology Penalty Rewards Continuous
improvement
Geo-Political conditions
Internal improvement
6. People
• People of highest level
of integrity should be
hired for UNO jobs
• People of highest level
of integrity should only
be allowed to be
involved in projects
• People whose main aim
is to earn salary in $
should be kept out
7. Process
• All internal processes
should be completely
transparent.
• Properly documented
processes
• Accountability clearly
defined.
• Everything should be
disclosed on web-sites
8. Process (contd.)
• Hotline to be provided.
Any employee, agency
can pick up and contact
• Very strong whistleblower
rule
• Integrity should be given
prominent place in
annual appraisal of
employees
• Exemplary punishment
for internal employees
who indulge in corrupt
practices
9. Process (contd.)
• Surprise visits for
projects
• Surprise audits of
projects
• Audit alone is not
sufficient, beyond
required
• “Creativity “ in financial
management to be
curbed
10. Process (contd.)
• Systemic corruption to
be tackled
• “Collective
responsibility” defense
should be tackled
11. Process (contd.)
• Reputed NGOs and
Individuals of highest
integrity should be part
of the auditing process
• Social audit of projects
should be done
• Local population should
be roped-in for effective
supervision of the work.
12. Process (contd.)
• A very strong culture
and perception should
be created internally,
that corruption is a
BIG NO, and all such
practices will be curbed
and guilty will not go
unpunished, come what
may
13. Process (contd.)
• Holistic approach, all
International
multilateral funding
agencies should share
best practices,
defaulters list and
recommended punitive
actions
• All deviations, funded
by any agency should
be cumulative
14. Technology
• More and more use of
technology, will bring
transparency and
efficiency into the
system
15. Penalty
• Corruption in multilateral
funded project should be
treated as “ Crime Against
Humanity”
• No. of deviations and
amount mis-appropriated
both should be
considered
• Special courts should be
set up for disposal of such
cases
• Time bound trial and
appeal period
16. Penalty (contd.)
• Depending upon the
gravity of the
corruption, starting
from entry level
employee to the head
of states, should be
made accused.
• For repeated offenders
and big amounts,
International courts
should be set up to
dispose off such cases.
17. Penalty (contd.)
• No future projects or
projects of less value
• Such nefarious activates
should have impact on
economic, political and
cultural ties at
international levels
18. Rewards
• Transparent, quality and
efficient work should be
rewarded by more
projects in the region
• Employees who help in
eradicating corruption
should be rewarded
19. Geo Political Conditions
• Country / region
specific special watch
• Countries going through
polls, army rule,
insurgency, perceived to
be high on corruption
etc. should be watched
with more rigor
• Past history of country
in project execution to
be considered
20. Internal improvement
• UNO preamble to be
amended
• Removing corruption
and mis-governance
from world, should be
part of preamble
• Special International
body to be formed to
tackle menace of
corruption and mis-
governance
21. Continuous improvement
• Dedicated expert teams
to be formed, who will
work round-the-clock to
tackle the menace of
corruption and mis-
governance in funded
projects.