2. background
neighbourhood planning is becoming well
established – widespread engagement, court
cases, ministerial decisions
3. be realistic about QB capability
technical support – eg SEA/Habitats
understanding of policy context
expertise on policy wording (DM)
handling non land use issues
keep QB focussed on basic conditions
make sure QB tell the story of plan development
including evidence used and decisions made
4. try to resolve any LPA/QB differences before
submission plan stage – examiners recommend
modifications only to meet the basic conditions
and convention rights
co-ordinate LPA and QB publicity/websites
encourage QB to work with all stakeholders
including developers
5. an examination where the questions are known - there
are no surprises – what an examiner can consider is
precisely defined
look at examination reports already issued and court
cases
encourage full use of the basic conditions statement
consider an independent ‘health check’ review –
usually undertaken in a few days
6.
7. independent desk-based review undertaken by a
qualified and experienced examiner
most beneficial at pre-submission stage
identifies issues that may cause delay or rejection
at examination
considers problems in meeting the basic
conditions and other requirements
provides general advice on changes that need to
be made
8. no win no fee operators
is evidence local, proportionate and sufficient?
(fairness includes affordability)
does SEA assess options?
is allocation selection justified?
are LGS designations evidenced?
use of reasoning and evidence informing an
emerging Local Plan process
negotiation to narrow or eliminate issues
9. source early so can drip-feed representations
LPA appointment – fully engage QB
highlight key issues and particular areas of
expertise required - eg regeneration, rural,
heritage
indicate timing of examination - assists checking
examiner availability
be realistic about professional indemnity
10.
11. 48 examiners on the Panel including chartered
town planners, chartered surveyors, barristers
since the Panel was established 48 plans have
been submitted for examination
45 (94%) have sourced independent examiners
through NPIERS
auditable and transparent process
12. NPIERS provide CV and suitability statement from
3 potential non-conflicted examiners
can request specific examiner be included on
basis background, qualifications, experience,
issues dealt with in previous reports
applications usually sufficient to appoint - if
questions consider email or phone
interview rarely necessary - LPA and QB should
be represented - deal with process, skills and
experience - not plan merits
13. LPA and examiner contract directly
agree invoicing arrangements
nominate a single LPA point of contact (some
LPA’s have NP dedicated officer/s)
agree communication protocol
LPA provide complete documentation in format
required
agree anticipated timeline
14. manage expectations and reduce cost - issue
guidance that representations should address the
basic conditions and other tests
late representations and new evidence not normally
considered
listing/summary of representations and clarification
of development plan/strategic policies helpful
examiner will visit the plan area - normally
unaccompanied - consider access
15. examination by consideration of written
representations is the general rule
if examiner decides a hearing is necessary
examiner will identify topic(s) for consideration,
parties to speak in addition to LPA and QB, take
charge of proceedings. LPA role – notice,
invitations, venue issues
examiner may request the LPA to note take
17. LPA project plan – involve electoral services -
work from preferred referendum date - consider
decision meeting cycles and delegated powers
examination will typically take 6 days work
complex representations, absence of an up to
date Local Plan, or a hearing can each add a
further 2 to 3 days
consider briefings and manage press and publicity
18. Chris Collison
Planning and Management Ltd
collisonchris@aol.com
01773 853450
uk.linkedin.com/pub/chris-collison/14/289/6aa
Paul Taylor
NPIERS Product Manager
ptaylor@rics.org
02076 951735