This will be useful for you if you are a new councillor, or a councillor new to planning. Or you are feeling a bit rusty and just want an update. It covers some planning basics, including on your role as a councillor
2. What is PAS ?
ā¢ PAS is a DCLG grant-funded programme but
part of the Local Government Association
ā¢ Governed by a āsector ledā board
ā¢ 10 staff ā commissioners, generalists, support
āPAS exists to provide support to local planning
authorities to provide efficient and effective planning
services, to drive improvement in those services and
to respond to and deliver changes in the planning
systemā
3. Scope of this Presentation
ā¢ To provide an introduction planning
ā¢ To help councillors understand their role
ā¢ To help councillors get the most from the
system
4. Introduction to planning
ā¢ What is planning?
ā¢ Planning legislation and policy
ā¢ Development management
ā¢ Decision making
ā¢ Appeals and Enforcement
7. Planningā¦
ā¢ sets out a long term vision for places
ā¢ provides a decision making framework to
manage competing uses for space;
ā¢ balances economic, social and environmental
needs.
ā¢ provides legitimacy through consultation and
testing of evidence;
ā¢ delivers change on the ground
8. Planning involves balancing issues
economic recession
climate change
environmental issues
meeting housing needs localism
long term strategies todayās pressures
brownfield development town cramming
retail āmarket forcesā viability of town centres
individual interest public interest
9. Councillors have an important role
ā¢ Strategic leadership:ā setting the vision and
direction
ā¢ Plan making: councillors try to reflect local
values and priorities in the policies
ā¢ Ward level: representing local views
ā¢ Neighbourhood planning ā link between
community and the council, involved in local
decisions on spending
10. Councillors have an important role
ā¢ Development Management
ā involvement with the community and
developers at an early stage
āRaising areas of concern
ā Informed debate
āWide range of issues and material
considerations to balance
āMaking the right decision (not always the
easiest)
11. Standards in planning are important
ā¢ Planning manages the right to develop land
ā¢ It involves balancing private and public interests
ā¢ Getting it wrong is costly (time, money, reputation
and long lasting impacts)
ā¢ Need to demonstrate, at all times:
ā Fairness
ā Openness
ā impartiality
12. Legislation and Policy
ā¢ The Planning Acts and Statutory Instruments
ā¢ The National Planning Policy Framework
(NPPF)
ā¢ The Development Plan
- - Local Plans and other development plan
documents
- Neighbourhood Plans
13. National Planning Policy Framework
(NPPF)
ā¢ Bringing together all the existing policy into
one policy document
ā¢ Pro-growth
ā¢ Golden thread - presumption
ā¢ Plan-led system
14. NPPF: purpose of the planning
system
ā¢ the NPPF emphasises the positive, rather
than the controlling or regulatory, side of
planning, to contribute to the achievement of
sustainable development
ā¢ Plans and decisions should be based on the
real world e.g. a sound āevidence baseā, an
understanding of economic viability etc.
ā¢ 3 mutually dependent elements:
- economic, social, environmental
15. NPPF and plan-making
ā¢ Local plan must show how objectively assessed
development needs can be met. Not capacity based.
ā¢ In a (locally) sustainable way
ā¢ Take into account local circumstances and market
signalsā¦.to inform judgements about demand
ā¢ Only where there would be significant and
demonstrable adverse affects which outweigh the
benefits when assessed against the framework as a
whole ā should a development need not be met
16. Strategic Planning and the Duty to
Co-operate
ā¢ Many planning issues stretch across
boundaries and need a ālarger than localā
response
ā¢ The duty to co-operate was introduced to
address these issues via the local plan
ā¢ Local Plans will be tested against the duty
ā¢ Early days: some plans passing this, others
are not.
17. Local plans
ā¢ The key to delivering sustainable development
ā¢ Be based on evidence
ā¢ Aspirational but realistic (deliverable)
ā¢ Reflect a collective vision developed through
engagement with local communities
ā¢ Set out the strategic priorities for the area
ā¢ Positively plan for development and
infrastructure required over a 15 year horizon
18. Neighbourhood plans
ā¢ Gives communities power to develop a shared
vision for their neighbourhood
ā¢ Prepared by town/parish councils or
neighbourhood forums
ā¢ Must be in general conformity with the
strategic policies of the Local Plan
ā¢ Should not promote less development than
set out in the Local Plan
ā¢ A few plans are close to being āadoptedā by
the local authority
19. The development plan is crucial
āIf regard is to be had to the development plan for the
purpose of any determination to be made under the
Planning Acts, the determination must be made in
accordance with the plan unless material considerations
indicate otherwiseā.
Section 38, Planning & Compulsory Purchase Act 2004
The āprimacyā of the Development Plan depends on it
being:
ā up to date
ā in accord with national planning policies
This is not changed by the Localism Act or the NPPF!
20. In practice
ā¢ The NPPF presumption
ā¢ Where an adopted (new or old-style) plan is
out of date, or doesnāt reflect the NPPF, the
NPPF will ātrumpā the adopted plan
ā¢ Particularly relevant for housing
ā¢ Around half of councils have an adopted plan
in place (July 13)
22. Development Management
ā¢ Pre-application discussions, considering and
determining actual apps, monitoring and
enforcement
ā¢ Concentrate on delivery ā not control
ā¢ Puts plans into action
ā¢ Councillorās role ā understanding the policies,
understanding the applications, getting
engaged, liaising with the community,
considering, deciding, reviewing
23. What is development?
Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s55
except where the context otherwise requires-
āthe carrying out of building, engineering, mining or
other operations in, on, over or under land, OR the
making of any material change in the use of any
buildings or other landā
24. Development?
ā¢ Is there a material change to the external
appearance of the building, or a material
change of use?
ā¢ If yes, then it is development needing planning
permission
ā¢ But some things are āpermitted developmentā
and donāt need planning permission from you
ā¢ Granted nationally by General Permitted
Development Order or Use Classes Order
25. Examples of Permitted development
ā¢ minor house extensions, walls and fences,
garages etc.
ā¢ temporary buildings and use
ā¢ agricultural buildings and operations
ā¢ some āacceptableā material changes of use
ā¢ minor works by statutory undertakers
26. Change of use
ā¢ a few specific changes are defined in the Act as always
āmaterialā, eg the subdivision of a single dwelling house
ā¢ otherwise there is no statutory definition; extensive
decisions of the courts have established various tests
and principles
ā¢ secondary legislation has established broad āuse
classesā; changes of use within these classes are not
development and so do not need planning permission
NB: a change between classes does not automatically
mean there will be a material change of use
27. Consultation and notification on
applications
ā¢ Statutory consultation
ā¢ Town & Parish Councils
ā¢ Non-statutory consultation
ā¢ Neighbour notification
ā¢ Community engagement
29. Delegated and committee decisions
ā¢ Delegation procedures aim to ensure that the
Planning Committee only considers the most
significant or contentious applications
ā¢ Aim for at least 90% of decisions delegated
ā¢ Referral to committee
ā¢ Time and resources
ā¢ Costs of committee decisions
ā¢ Local democracy
30. NPPF and decision making
ā¢ Local planning authorities should:
ā approve development proposals that accord
with statutory plans without delay; and
ā grant permission where the plan is absent, silent,
indeterminate or where relevant policies are out of
dateā¦ā¦ā¦ā¦ā¦ā¦ā¦..unless
āā¦.adverse impacts of allowing development
would significantly and demonstrably outweigh
the benefits, when assessed against the policies
in the Framework taken as a whole
31. Making a decision
ā¢ Start with the development plan policies
ā¢ Take into account other material
considerations, including:
ā¢ National policy
ā¢ Other council strategies
ā¢ Context and merits of the particular application
ā¢ Technical consideration
ā¢ Consultees views on planning aspects
ā¢ Other material planning matters
ā¢ Come to a view
32. Material considerations includeā¦
ā¢ Financial considerations
ā¢ Overlooking/loss of privacy
ā¢ Loss of light or
overshadowing
ā¢ Parking, highway safety and
traffic
ā¢ Noise
ā¢ Effect on listed building and
conservation area
ā¢ Layout and density of
building
ā¢ Design, appearance and
materials
ā¢ Disabled personās access
ā¢ Nature conservation
ā¢ Previous planning decisions
33. Non material considerations
Matters that should not be taken into account in
deciding planning applications include:
ā¢ Loss of view
ā¢ Negative effect on the value of properties
ā¢ Land ownership or restrictive covenants
ā¢ Applicantās personal circumstances (unless exceptional such
as relating to a physical disability)
ā¢ Business competition
ā¢ Matters controlled under building regulations or other non-planning
legislation
34. The Development Plan
Section 38 of the Planning & Compulsory
Purchase Act 2004:
āIf regard is to be had to the development plan
for the purpose of any determination to be
made under the planning Acts, the
determination is to be made in accordance
with the plan unless material considerations
indicate otherwiseā
35. The Development Plan again
ā¢ Policies can be interpreted differently
ā¢ Some policies conflict with each other
ā¢ And decisions can seem to conflict the with
plan
ā¢ You can make these decisions provided that it
is based on the merits of the case, in the light
of all other material considerations
36. The decision
ā¢ Grant planning permission
- subject to conditions
- subject to planning obligations
ā¢ Special types of approval or consent e.g. prior
approval, listed building consent, conservation
area consent
ā¢ Refuse planning permission (or prior approval,
LBC, CAC etc)
37. Refusals
ā¢ must be lawful
ā¢ must be justified by reasons, based on the
Development Plan and any other material
considerations in the case
ā¢ may be subject to appeal, so reasons should at
least be defensible and based on credible
evidence
ā¢ unreasonable or invalid refusals may result in
cost awards against the council; but considered
decisions properly defended will not, even if lost
at appeal
38. Approvals
ā¢ must be lawful
ā¢ justification should be clearly minuted if different
from officer report/recommendation
ā¢ should include a statement relating to
development plan policies
ā¢ usually subject to conditions - with reasons
which pass the tests in Circular 11/95 (this will
be the issue if there is an appeal against any of
them)
39. Being effective at Committee
ā¢ Be prepared
ā¢ Be focused:
ā¢ focus on the precise points where you agree or
disagree with officer assessment
ā¢ Know your policies
ā¢ Stick to policies and material considerations
ā¢ Ensure your points are valid in planning law (take advice
in advance if necessary)
ā¢ be aware of the need for probity and the public
perception of your actions
40. Appeals
ā¢ against a refusal
ā¢ against a condition on permission
ā¢ against an enforcement notice
ā¢ against failure to determine within the
statutory period
41. Assessing an appeal
ā¢ written representations
ā¢ public hearings
ā¢ public inquiries
ā¢ much-simplified process for householder cases
ā¢ Councillors can be involved, but take guidance
from officers
42. Award of costs
ā¢ one of the parties must seek an award ā itās not
automatic
ā¢ rights apply to authorities, appellants and the
Inspectorate (or Secretary of State)
ā¢ it can be for full or partial costs (you can actually āwinā
the appeal and still have costs against you)
ā¢ the other party must have behaved unreasonably,
causing unnecessary expense or delay
43. Developer contributions: S106 and
Community Infrastructure Levy
ā¢ S106 obligations ā site specific, includes affordable housing,
negotiated and agreed
ā¢ CIL is set out, and fixed, in a charging schedule
ā¢ The aim of CIL is to help pay for infrastructure needed to
support new development but not to remedy existing
deficiencies unless the new scheme will make it worse.
ā¢ Councils must spend the income on infrastructure ā but you
can decide what (and that can change over time).
ā¢ Rates can vary by geographic area, use, and size
ā¢ CIL applies to all permitted development above 100 sqm from
April this year.
45. Enforcement 1
ā¢ Discretionary
ā¢ Act proportionately in responding to suspected
breaches of planning control
ā¢ Publish an Enforcement Plan
ā¢ Works without permission not an offence
ā¢ Legal notices
ā¢ Other action
46. Enforcement 2
Options available:
ā¢Submit a retrospective application
ā¢Submit a Certificate of Lawfulness application
ā¢Negotiations between the alleged offender and
Council officers
ā¢Enforcement appeal
47. Behaviour - Rules and Codes
ā¢ Nolan Report (Standards in public life) 1997
ā¢ Local Government Act 2000
ā¢ Local Authorities (Model Code of Conduct)
(England) Order 2007
ā¢ Local codes for planning
ā¢ Killian & Pretty ā role of councillors
ā¢ Localism Act 2011
ā¢ Probity in Planning 2013
48. Councillor conduct and role
ā¢ As a Ward Councillorā¦
ā¦you can support or oppose an application and
represent the views of your constituents
ā¢ As a Planning Committee Memberā¦
ā¦you still can, but you must still retain an open
minded disposition; if not it could compromise your
(impartial) role on the committee.
āAvoid favouring a person, company, group or locality
or putting yourself in a position where you appear to
do soā
ā¢ Applies to policy making as well
49. Whatās changed?
Localism Act ā section 25
ā¢ Makes it clear that councillors are entitled to
campaign on issues, express views etc. without
disqualifying themselves from decision-making
PROVIDED you can demonstrate absence of
"bias" or "predeterminationā.
50. To close
ā¢ Feedback forms
ā¢ Follow up impact assessment
ā¢ Use our website/forums
ā¢ Newsletter
ā¢ Keep in touch
51.
52. Contact PAS
email pas@local.gov.uk
web www.pas.gov.uk
phone 020 7664 3000
Editor's Notes
This is intended for councillors fairly new to planning. It covers planning basics and a councillors role in decision making. It is a long presentation, but is intended for you to dip in and out of to use the most relevant aspects for your needs. There are other councillor presentations on our website that go into certain areas in more detail.
We provide
Brief introduction to the content of the module
Help Councillors be clear about their role and engagement.
Explain that there are other Councillor presentations which go into the various topics in more detail ā todayās presentation is very much an INTRODUCTION TO PLANNING
These are the main elements of the planning system that Members making decisions need to be familiar with.
From the basics of āWhat is planning? ā to essential technical and legal procedures such as enforcement and planning obligations.
Planning has been in the news more over the past year or so than Iāve ever known it before.
A lot has been about housing in the countryside ā a bit polarised into a house builders vs nimbies debate.
More recently about changes to Permitted Development to allow bigger extensions to houses.
Good ā to get people to be aware of and to discuss issues
But not really about the big planning decisions that need to be made.
Planning is exciting and interesting and touches everyone.
Houses, infrastructure (roads, rail, power supply and generation etc.), schools, hospitals, factories, leisure facilities, retailing, education, tourism are all shaped by planning.
It shapes our town centres and suburbs and helps to protect our best landscapes, coastlines and buildings.
It can also be very controversial, unpopular and difficult.
Because planning is about big things.
Planning is about sustainable development ā balancing the economic, environmental and social impacts of new development. Planning is not just about dealing with planning applications; the plan you have, and the decisions then made on applications, will impact on housing, job creation, climate change, investment, infrastructure and the quality of peopleās lives. That is one of the reasons why planning is often controversial. Finding the right balance between different objectives is what makes your job challenging and exciting.
So sustainable development is about positive growth ā making economic, environmental and social progress for this and future generations.
The planning system is about helping to make this happen.
There are two main aspects to planning in local government ā writing and implementing a plan, and dealing with planning applications. Underpinning both of these areas is the need for community involvement ā something you can take a lead role in.
(Government is implementing a series of reforms, aimed at reducing complexity and regulation, and enabling greater local input to planning. Responding to a perception that planning is a barrier to growth).
Sometimes these are very difficult ā hard choices to make.
There is a legal framework and a policy framework.
Legislation mainly takes the form of Acts of Parliament and Statutory Instruments. The main Acts of Parliament are:
The Town and Country Planning Act 1990
The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004
The Planning Act 2008
The Localism Act 2011
But there are many others.
Some examples of Statutory Instruments are:
The Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012
The Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2010 (and subsequent Amendments)
The Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations 2010
And again there are many others
The National Planning Policy Framework was published 27 March 2012. It replaced much of the previous national planning policy and guidance in Planning Policy Statements, Planning Policy Guidance Notes and many other documents. The NPPF is a key part of Government reforms aimed at making the planning system less complex and more accessible, protecting the environment and promoting sustainable growth.
The 2004 Act provides that the Development Plan for an area was the RSS and the Local Development Framework. The RSS contained regional policies and was prepared by the Regional Planning Body for the area. Regional planning structures have now been revoked and strategic planning will be done by LPAs working in co operation to tackle their larger than local issues. At examination they will need to satisfy the Duty to Co operate and demonstrate that they have worked together in positive and constructive way that is on going. Failure to do this means you wonāt be able to adopt you plan.
The Local Development Framework (LDF) was a suite of documents ā Core Strategy, Site Specific Allocations, Area Action Plans etc.
Whilst the legislation affecting the LDF has not changed, the NPPF makes it clear that the Government now envisages a less complex system. The NPPF refers to āLocal Plansā and āeach local planning authority should produce a Local Plan for its areaāā¦. āLocal Plans should set out the opportunities for development and clear policies on what will or will not be permitted and whereā. (paragraph 154)
Any additional development plan documents should only be used where clearly justifiedā (Paragraph 153)
The Localism Act introduced a new type of plan ā Neighbourhood Plans. āNeighbourhood planning gives communities direct power to develop a shared vision for their neighbourhood and deliver the sustainable development they need. (NPPF paragraph 183) āNeighbourhood plans must be in general conformity with the strategic policies of the Local Planā¦.Neighbour plans and orders should not promote less development than set out in the Local Plan or undermine its strategic policies. (paragraph 184). āOnce a neighbourhood plan has demonstrated its general conformity with the strategic policies of the Local Plan and is brought into force, the policies it contains take precedence over existing non-strategic policies in the Local Plan for that neighbourhood, where they are in conflict. (paragraph 185) Neighbourhood plans can be prepared by town/parish councils or community forums and do not take effect unless there is a majority of support in a referendum in the area. The Upper Eden Neighbourhood Plan was the first to be adopted, having received 90.22% of votes cast in favour at a referendum. This has now been joined Thame and St James area in Exeter. A few more are getting close.
The NNPF was published in March 2012 and replaced and reduced policy and guidance. Previously national planning policy and guidance was contained in a series of Planning Policy Statements (PPSs) and Planning Policy Guidance Notes (PPGs). In addition there was a series of Mineral Policy statements (PPSs) and Mineral Planning Guidance Notes (MPGs). These have mostly been superseded by the NPPF. The NPPF does not contain specific waste policies, since national waste planning policy will be published as part of the National Waste Management Plan for England which is not expected before late 2013. PPS 10 āPlanning for Sustainable Waste Managementā (July 2005) therefore remains in force.
But it is quite clear that the Government does expect you to plan for āobjectively assessed housing needsā ā quite clear through comments on plans coming forward, and on appeals against housing refusals where there is no identified 5 year supply.
The NPPF is important. It is a material consideration in determining planning applications.
The NPPF does firmly set out that it is still a plan led system.
It requires āneedsā to be met and local plans need to be ā deliverableā āviableā, ārealisticā, and āflexibleā.
Includes land prices, viability ā increased emphasis (para 39) on viability of development ā which should not be threatened by āobligations and policy burdensā. So the cumulative impact of your policies should not risk the implementation of the plan via developments ā should not jeopardise āacceptable returns to a willing land owner and willing developerā.
Plans must āfacilitateā development āthroughout the economic cycleā.
LAs should have a clear understanding of business needs and how to meet them
Work with neighbours if needs canāt be met within own area
BUT ā how local authorities deal with the tension between delivering growth, ensuring sustainability and competitive returns for owners ā is still being worked through. Will be positions taken, though, by authorities and Inspectorate.
The Duty to Co-operate was introduced as a form of regional planning, delivered via co-operation between organisations, and to be delivered via local plans.
The NPPF specifies certain topics as being appropriate strategic matters, which cross authority boundaries, which you will probably need to co-operate with your neighbours on. They are:
Provision of homes and jobs; Retail, leisure and commercial development; Infrastructure for transport, telecoms, waste, water, flood-risk, coastal change, minerals & energy; Health, security, community & cultural infrastructure; Climate change mitigation and adaptation; Conservation & enhancement of the natural & historic environment, including landscape. But only where relevant. If you havenāt got strategic, cross boundary issues raised by conservation issues, you donāt need to apply the duty.
Local planning authorities should set out the strategic priorities for these area in the Local Plan. And to pass the duty test (which needs to start early and be ongoing) they have to demonstrate outcomes.
The NPPF sets out the role of Local Plans, a summary of which is provided in the bullet points in the slide.
This is where you set out your priorities. It is a key document and should be one of the main strategies for the council, linking up other strategies and investment programmes.
Approximately 500 areas across England are involved in neighbourhood planning
Ensure neighbourhood plans are deliverable, sustainable and credible to be part of the local development plan.
Ensure neighbourhood orders are appropriate to grant development consent for compatible development
Enable communities to enter into a positive dialogue with local planning authorities
The examination is to check the basic conditions.
Upper Eden Valley in Cumbria is the first plan to go through referendum in March 2013.
If they pass the referendum (simple majority of those voting) the authority has to adopt it; it becomes part of the Dev Plan and will be used for decision making.
Once adopted, the policies in neighbourhood plans must be taken into account in decisions on any planning application in that area.
Also opens up opportunity for more funds to be spent on local infrastructure (CiL allocation)
So these are the documents that make up the development plan. The development plan is a crucial tool in planning ā made clear in legislation and the NPPF.
NPPF makes it clear that authorities should have an identified 5 year land supply. If they donāt then their policies are seen as out of date:
Para 49
Housing applications should be considered in the context of the presumption
in favour of sustainable development. Relevant policies for the supply of
housing should not be considered up-to-date if the local planning authority
cannot demonstrate a five-year supply of deliverable housing sites.
This is the implementation side of planning. Deals with getting the right development on the ground. It is more than just processing planning applications - at least it should be. It is engaging with councillors, communities and developers to āplan positivelyā and get the best development possible. It involves working with developers on stalled sites, monitoring and where necessary enforcement, and generally managing development to achieve the spatial objectives set out in the plan.
Pre application engagement by Councillors is essential
This is the bit that is most often in the public eye. Many people only pay attention to planning (and maybe only get in touch with you) when there is a planning application that affects them. It might be their own, their neighbourās, or one down the road.
is it ādevelopmentā in terms of the statute?
physical change (usually of some permanence), other than some categories excluded from the definition in the Act
a āmaterialā change of use
If the answer to this question is NO, then planning permission is not required: the use or physical change are not ādevelopmentā and are not subject to planning control
NB: if the change is not a āmaterialā change of use it is not even development
if it is ādevelopmentā, is this a form of development which is āpermittedā [āPDā]?
If YES, an application is not required ā unless the authority has removed permitted development rights (āArticle 4 Directionā)
In some areas of the country, known generally as 'designated areas', permitted development rights are more restricted. If you live in a Conservation Area, a National Park, an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty or the Norfolk or Suffolk Broads, you will need to apply for planning permission for certain types of work which do not need an application in other areas.
Too detailed.
A1 Shops
A2 Financial and Professional Services
A3 Restaurants & Cafes
A4 Drinking Establishments
A5 Hot Food Takeaways
B1 Business
B2 General Industrial
B8 Storage and Distribution
C1 Hotels
C2 Residential Institutions
C2A Secure residential institutions
C3 Dwellinghouses
C4 Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMO)
D1 Non-residential Institutions
D2 Assembly and Leisure
Changes between some classes are permitted.
A recent change is to allow changes of use from offices to residential without permission. Government are also talking about introducing a permitted change from retail to residential.
Growth and Infrastructure Act 2013 introduced changes to PD criteria and reduced restrictions on changes between use classes with the aim of speeding up and streamlining the development processes.
Why necessary
Role of parish councils
Press and public notices
Legal requirements/local practice
Balance between committee and delegated decisions. - not possible to report all applications to committee.
Councillors and officers must develop mutual trust and understanding.
Every Council should have a delegation scheme and criteria for referring applications to committee e.g. contrary to Development Plan or where the number of objections exceeds a certain number.
Published protocol ā open and everyone can see. Sets out how everything from how the public can get involved (e.g. speaking at committee), to site visits. It should be visible to the public and be the cornerstone of all communications and interaction.
Duty to whole community ā not just that applicant or that objector. We must be aware of our role as community leaders serving the whole community/public through the system.
Good and ethical - planning decisions affect us all, affect land and property values, they can affect livelihoods, quality of life, our health, social and economic well being. Planning decisions carry great responsibility on the part of those making them.
If have a plan in place:
If proposal accords with local plan, pass it quickly
If it doesnāt, refuse it quickly
No plan in place (or its silent, out of date or indeterminate):
Proposal assessed against sustainable development principles of whole NPPF
Subject to test of āsignificant and demonstrable harmā
Accept that policies can be interpreted differently
And that the weight to be given to material considerations is for the decision maker
The list is not exhaustive.
Not all will apply in every case.
The weight to be given to the different considerations will vary according to the circumstances of the case.
Financial considerations ā recently introduced, and includes income to the council generated by S106 obligations, CiL, and New Homes Bonus
It is helpful if the Council has a system to explain to third parties what are material considerations and what are or unlikely to be material considerations (e.g. information provided with public speaking or neighbour notification guidance) . This will help objectors to understand the process who otherwise may feel that their comments are being disregarded.
When matters are addressed by other legislation (eg licensing regimes, health & safety, fire safety) they should not be taken into account in the planning decision.
The history or character of the applicant is unlikely to be a material consideration other than in certain exceptional circumstances such as a mineral operatorās experience in managing and restoring a site.
Commercial competition (eg Tesco v Sainsburys) is not a material consideration BUT whether the development proposal is out of town or in town (i.e. relative impact on the vitality and viability of the town centre) MAY be material.
Issues related to decency or belief (e.g. sex shops, places of worship) are not likely to be relevant material considerations.
The starting point
Development plan (and reference to NPPF and any other relevant national advice) is the starting point ā and will always be referred to in officersā reports.
How the NPPF applies to decisions. First through the plan, but if the plan is silent on an issue (or out of date, or not prepared, as in some authorities), councils must still have regard to national policy. The lack of a plan or policy does not give Councillors a āget out of jail freeā card on difficult issues. The Government had given Local Planning Authorities until the end of March 2013 to have their plans adopted but after this date it is the NPPF that now carries the most weight in the absence of an up-to-date Local Plan.
This is relevant whoever (officers or committee) makes the decision.
- a policy is out of date compared with national policy
- the monitoring information shows that the situation āon the groundā has changed
- exceptional local circumstances
The Committee can decide to grant planning permission and therefore allow the development to proceed or refuse permission.
Otherwise unacceptable development, can be made acceptable through the use of conditions or planning obligations.
Most decisions to grant planning permission will be subject to various planning conditions being satisfied.
Planning conditions should only be imposed where they are necessary, relevant to planning and to the development to be permitted, enforceable, precise and reasonable in all respects. (NPPF paragraph 206)
Planning obligations should only be used where it is not possible to address unacceptable impacts through a planning condition and are required to meet the following tests
Necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms
Directly related to the development; and
Fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind to the development. (NPPF paragraph 204)
For some types of application planning permission is deemed granted if the planning authority does not respond to the developerās application within a specified period called prior approval. Typical examples are telecommunication or agricultural developments. Because telecommunication masts often generate considerable local opposition it is not unusual for such developments to be determined by Committee rather than officers which can put a severe constraint on meeting the required timescales.
Other special types of consent exist such as Listed Building Consent ā to demolish, alter or extend a listed building in a way that affects its character or appearance as a building of special architectural or historic interest ā or Conservation Area Consent ā for the total or substantial demolition of any unlisted building in a Conservation Area.
Trees can be protected by the designation of Tree Preservation Orders or if they are located within a Conservation Area. For such protected trees consent is required for works to prune or fell them.
Planning applications can only be refused for genuine planning reasons.
This applies to decisions made at delegated or committee
Particularly important for overturned recommendations. You canāt refuse something just because you donāt like it, or your constituents donāt like it. It has to be based on planning grounds and agreed at committee. You canāt send officers away to work it out. That kind of behaviour is seen to be unreasonable.
Itās also just not fair, and doesnāt give a good impression of the way the council operates.
written representations
an exchange of written statements
Inspector visits site only to see
public hearings
exchange of written submissions
informal discussion lead by the Inspector
discussion may continue at site visit
public inquiries
written statements and proofs of evidence of witnesses
advocates present the case and may cross examine witnesses
Inspector visits site only to see
much-simplified process for householder cases
Details (including examples of unreasonable behaviour) are in Circular 03/2009
EXAMPLES (for the LPA)
failure to produce credible evidence to substantiate each reason for refusal
refusing only because of local objection
ignoring policy, in the absence of other compelling material planning considerations
relying on non-planning reasons
refusing to renew, where no changed circumstances
refusing details as a way of re-visiting the principle
There is a separate PAS presentation on viability and developer contributions
What is really important to deliver the development in your area? Set up your priorities and get agreements to them.
CIL is a corporate matter ā all those involved in collection and spending should understand it and be clear of their role.
Requires knowledge of the infrastructure needs of the area.
What mechanisms or agreements do you need to put in place
S106s - If the development is capable of being charged CIL, the S106 obligation must meet these legal tests:
NECESSARY to make the development acceptable in planning terms
DIRECTLY RELATED to the development
FAIRLY AND REASONABLY related in kind and scale to the development
These are also now the policy tests in the NPPF
Explain that whilst discretionary is central to credibility of Planning.
Formerly PPS 18 provided clear guidance ā such as when not expedient to take action. NPPF deals with enforcement in a single paragraph (paragraph 207).
A breach of planning control is ā the carrying out of development without the required planning permission or failing to comply with any condition or limitation subject to which planning permission has been grantedā -199o Act.
Need a policy ā time consuming and complex.
Various notices ā Planning Contravention Notice, Enforcement Notice, Breach of Condition Notice, Stop Notice
Injunctions.
Essential to have knowledgeable legal support/advice.
The person(s) served with the Enforcement Notice or other types of notice has a number of options open to them.
They can submit a retrospective application which must be dealt with by the Local Planning Authority in exactly the same way as a normal planning application i.e. without prejudice.
They can submit a Certificate of Lawfulness application.
Whatever course of action is decided it should be preceded by negotiations with the Enforcement Officer.
Submitting an enforcement appeal is very much the last resort. The appeal will be decided by an independent planning inspector.
Councillors need to know that there are rules and a framework within which they operate. All designed to ensure proper, fair and transparent decision making.
Lord Nolan was the first chairman of a commission that highlighted that planning is probably the most contentious matter with which local government deals. While his report created, as mentioned earlier, an unhelpful atmosphere where councillors shied away from any involvement with applicants, it contained many positive recommendations such as that members of planning committees should be trained and there should be greater openness in the planning process.
The Localism Act intended to provide additional protection to Councillors who have expressed views on proposals before a planning committee and paved the way for the abolition of the Standards Board for England (currently postponed to July). In its place, the Act introduced a criminal offence introduce a new criminal offence of failing to disclose or register membersā interests.
The LGA first issued its Probity in Planning guidance in 1997 after the Nolan Report. It was subsequently revised in 2009 and has now (2013) unsdergone a further revision to take into account the Localism Act.
Point out to audience that there is a separate PAS presentation which deals in detail with the probity issues which surround the role of Councillors on Planning Committees but there is a need to highlight some of the key issues to complete todayās presentation.
The basis of the planning system is the consideration of private proposals against wider public interests. Much is often at stake in this process, and opposing views are often strongly held by those involved. Whilst planning committee councillors should take account of these views, the general role and conduct of councillors and officers is they should not favour any person, company, group or locality, nor put themselves in a position where they appear to do so. Councillors who do not feel that they can act in this way should consider whether they are best suited to serve on a planning committee.
Also remember any other roles you have ā as a cabinet member, or within your political group.
This is different from before. After Nolan in 1997 lobbying and openly expressing opinions was seen as too risky.
The Localism Act 2011, especially section 25, has changed what is allowed. Before then Councillors on Planning Committees were strongly discouraged from expressing any view on the merits of an application before they had seen the officerās report setting out all the policy and other material considerations. The Localism Act changed that because the Coalition Government felt that a Councillor was not able to deliver on his role of championing an area if he was not able to express a view on a proposal which might have a significant influence on the area. So now it is allowed to express a view though that needs to be qualified by retaining an open mind as new facts and information becomes available. At the same time it is important not to give the appearance of having a closed mind.
Section 25 makes it clear that the normal activities of a councillor, representing constituents and raising questions, are acceptable and will not represent pre-determination. You will still be able to vote on the application (unless, of course, you have already made up your mind).
A lot more detail on this issue is available in the Committees and Probity PAS presentation for councillors.
Part of our grant conditions are that we do independent impact assessment work. So we may, in a few weeks/months time, get in touch with you (via Arup) to ask how useful you found this event after a bit of time has passed.
We provide our support for free, so in return, we would appreciate it if you gave us 10 minutes or so of your time to help us work out how effective we are being.