Summary Of The Federalist Paper

Summary Of The Federalist Paper
The Federalist papers are a set of 85 essays and articles written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. These papers were in support of
ratifying the constitution. Federalist number 16 starts right off the bat with Alexander Hamilton and his thoughts about the end of confederacy and
where we fall at as a country.
Throughout this chapter Hamilton shares a variety of methods that he used to question the country's ability to join together after the fall of the
confederacy. Hamilton tries to calm many American who fear that the government is too strong because they were created by the new constitution of the
United States. Although many people were in distress Hamilton knew how to handle the situation and states that the government
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Federalism Essay
Throughout history there have been a large quantity debates to decide the fate of America. In the late 18th century, America had finally broken off
from Britain's control and was looking for a new form of government. Originally, the Articles of Confederation connected the founding thirteen states of
America, which was a beginner version of a constitution. This eventually became an issue since these articles did not give any power to the central
government. Because of this, the states had many problems in international politics since they had just found freedom and did not have the respect of
other countries. Eventually there was talk of the necessity of a new document of some sort to attempt to give the central government a higher purpose
...show more content...
Men like Patrick Henry, Samuel Adams, and Richard Henry strongly believed in the Anti–Federalist movement, they tried to prove that a strong
government could be found if the states could possess most of the nation's control. "Nevertheless, great States have their own particular advantages
which it is necessary to recognize" (Tocqueville 70). The Anti–Federalists received their support from rural areas, such as farmers, because these were
the people who feared a stronger central government and the addition to their tax burden. Many civilians who supported minimizing a strong central
government did not appeal to the fact that each state would have a representative, which basically spoke for the entire state, since this representative
cannot share multiple opinions. Anti–Federalists were afraid of not being heard because under a strong central government in a large nation like
America, many opinions or concerns would not be taken under consideration. They believed that a proper government would function better if all
concerns are heard and dealt with. The Anti–Federalists had written a series of articles arguing the constitution, called The Anti–Federalist papers.
These articles argued that the constitution would take away the freedom and rights that America had won in the American Revolution and that the
government would ignore the states and only protect the rich. The Federalist Party clearly opposed most ideas from the Anti–Federalist party.

Federalist Papers : The Federalist Paper
Daniel Gasca
Mr. Brooks
AP Government Period 1
10/27/15
The Federalist Papers
The Federalist Papers Ten and Fifty–One were the ideal papers written by Madison to support thВ¬В¬В¬В¬В¬В¬В¬В¬e ratification of the
Constitution. Out of all the federalist papers, these are two of the most important federalist papers. So what were the federalist papers? They were 85
essays written by three gentlemen: Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay that explained particular provisions of the Constitution in
detail. Alexander Hamilton goes on to be the first treasury secretary, James Madison goes on to be the fourth president and John Jay the first chief
justice in US history. So what was the purpose of these papers? Well, they were written to gain support for the US Constitution, especially in New
York. While many people might see it as inevitable, the Constitution was a revolutionary step. Because of the revolutionary nature of the new
constitution, arguments were necessary to rationalize it. Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Virginia, and New York were the states critical to the success
or failure of the Constitution. Of these four states, New York by far was the state where the success of the constitution was in the most doubt.
Quickly, Alexander Hamilton decided that a massive propaganda campaign was necessary in New York, more than in any other state. So with the
help of James Madison and John Jay, he published several essays in different newspapers in New York. There is really little

Summary Of The Federalist Papers
The Federalist Papers are a collection of 85 essays and articles written by three of the most prominent men in early United States history: Alexander
Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. All of these essays were written to try to ratify the United States Constitution. Seventy–seven were published
serially in The Independent Journal and The New York Packet between October 1787 and August 1788. A compilation of these and eight others, called
The Federalist; or, The New Constitution, was published in two volumes in 1788 by J. and A. McLean. The collection's original title was The
Federalist; the title The Federalist Papers did not emerge until the 20th century.
As many as seventy seven were published in The Independent Journal and The New York...show more content...
Federalist No. 10, in which Madison discusses the means of preventing rule by majority faction and advocates a large, commercial republic, is
generally regarded as the most important of the 85 articles from a philosophical perspective; it is complemented by Federalist No. 14, in which
Madison takes the measure of the United States, declares it appropriate for an extended republic, and concludes with a memorable defense of the
constitutional and political creativity of the Federal Convention.[3] In Federalist No. 84, Hamilton makes the case that there is no need to amend the
Constitution by adding a Bill of Rights, insisting that the various provisions in the proposed Constitution protecting liberty amount to a "bill of
rights". Federalist No. 78, also written by Hamilton, lays the groundwork for the doctrine of judicial review by federal courts of federal legislation or
executive acts. Federalist No. 70 presents Hamilton's case for a one–man chief executive. In Federalist No. 39, Madison presents the clearest exposition
of what has come to be called "Federalism". In Federalist No. 51, Madison distills arguments for checks and balances in an essay often quoted for its
justification of government as "the greatest of all reflections on human

Federalist Essay
After winning their independence in the American Revolution, America's leaders were hesitant to create a strong centralized government in fear that it
would only replace King George III's tyranny. As a result, the first constitution, the Articles of Confederation, gave the national government hardly any
power over the states, and created chaos within the nation. Because of the Articles' inefficiency, a new document called the Constitution was drafted.
The Constitution created a more centralized government with the separation of powers among executive, legislative, and judicial branches. The
ratification of this new constitution created a debate among the federalists and the anti–federalists. The federalists were supporters of the...show more
content...
2: Jay). Jay set out to persuade the public about the importance of their voice in ratifying the Constitution by appealing to their sense of patriotism and
by reminding them of their own powers to judge upon the validity of the arguments. The federalists made it very clear that they, and the future
Constitution, would take the views of the public with serious consideration. In the same essay, Jay also wrote that "the people must cede to it some of
their natural rights, in order to vest it with requisite powers." He reminded the people to look out for the interest of the nation as a whole. Increasing
distrust in public affairs and the search for private rights were some of the distresses the infant nation was undergoing. "These must be chiefly, if not
wholly, effects of the unsteadiness and injustice with which a factious spirit has tainted our public administration" (No.10: Madison). The federalists
believed that a republican form of government was the best remedy in eliminating factions, citizens with a common inspiring cause that acted harmfully
to another, without destroying liberty. This would be possible because a higher number of representatives would guard against the factions, which
would never become the majority under the republic. "After an unequivocal experience of the inefficacy

The Federalists
The ability to unify a nation in a liberal democracy and work towards obtaining a given objective is incredibly difficult when everyone's opinion is
supposed to be valued. However it's not just valuing everyone's opinion that can cause concern, but the fact that people are allowed to act on their
opinions, no matter how radical or crazy they are to the majority of the population. This allows for dissenting opinions against the general will to rise
up and hold seats within the legislature; therefore, legitimizing their claims by thrusting them into the public spotlight. This can be both good and bad
and it was explored in–depth by James Madison in The Federalist Papers. In his work he states the obvious concerns factions can have on a society
Madison's usage of the word "most" seems to the reader that he is assuming more than 50%, however, those popular social movements consist of
people of all economic standing on both sides. Therefore, how can the unequal distribution of property be the cause of factions. Without factions
(according to Madison) society would have to be involved in a communist state to guarantee the equal distribution of property so as not to cause
factions to develop. However, society can't enter into a state of an authoritarian regime because it needs to maintain liberty, a theme Madison believes
is unreplaceable. Instead of trying to remove factions by mandating a communist egalitarian world view (which some people understand when they read
Madison's work, not what Madison himself said), society should embrace factions as an example of political and intellectual freedom working
beautifully. It demonstrates that dissenting views are able to properly lobby government officials, through either being elected or organizing protests.
There is validity to the claim that factions cause unnecessary bureaucracy, however, the constitution of the United States formed a government that
intentionally worked this way, it was expected factions would rise up, that's why there is so many checks and balances. The checks and balance system
is the effective way of handling factions, not removing liberty, and certainly not forming a communist egalitarian state. Factions are not only necessary
to maintaining a capitalist society, but they are also important in guaranteeing that dissenting views and opinions are allowed to be heard. They serve a
role and purpose in the echo

Dual Federalism Essay
a)Federalism directly addresses relationships that deals with the division between national and state governments. There are two types of Federalisms,
one of them is called dual federalism. This means that the states and national governments remain in their own spheres and is known as a "layer cake".
The second type of Federalism, is the cooperative federalism. Which is that powers and policy assignments are shared between the states and national
governments and is known as the "marble cake".
b)Two types of powers used to increase federal government relative to the states are as following. Categorical grants were specifically designed for a
particular purpose. The states have to spend their money according to government wishes. Also the

federalism Essay
Federalism
The United States Government is beloved to all Americans, in the simple fact that all men are created equal and all men are given equal opportunity,
to aspire to achieve success and make their dreams come true. Although the percentage of people who achieve all of their goals in life is fairly small,
they have the freedom to chase them and America for the most part is a pretty content place. The "law of the land" that sets the standards for our rights
and privileges is the U.S. Constitution.
As pretty and proper as the U.S. Constitution sounds, there has always been and always will be some conflicts and concerns about different laws and
amendments and even values that...show more content...
However with all the power that the President possesses there are also many limits set on him, including the length of time he is allowed to hold his
job. However the President who runs the entire country, is appointed by the states.
This power and compromise is also included amongst the Congress. Each state appoints members of the legislature. Each state gets an equal numbers
of electors in the Senate and the House of Representatives. The President is also required to take an oath before he takes over in office. "I do
solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, 1`protect, and
defend the Constitution of the United States." Adams had the brilliant idea of Checks & Balances where he broke the government into three
branches; the president, Congress, and the judiciary. Each of them had power but no one branch would be allowed to enjoy a monopoly of power.
However when problems did occur each branch was allowed to put their two cents in and try to resolve whatever conflict that arose.
However there are times when the Constitution puts its foot down, and prohibits power of the states . A big example of this is Article 1, Section 10. It
lists all powers prohibited of the states

Federalists and Anti-Federalists Essay
The Constitution, when first introduced, set the stage for much controversy in the United States. The two major parties in this battle were the
Federalists and the Anti–Federalists. The Federalists, such as James Madison, were in favor of ratifying the Constitution. On the other hand, the
Anti–Federalists, such as Patrick Henry and Richard Henry Lee, were against ratification. Each party has their own beliefs on why or why not this
document should or should not be passed. These beliefs are displayed in the following articles: Patrick Henry's "Virginia Should Reject the
Constitution," Richard Henry Lee's "The Constitution Will Encourage Aristocracy," James Madison's "Federalist Paper No. 10," and "The Letters to
Brutus." In these...show more content...
He thinks that this system would never really be followed. The senate, he says, is not structured well enough to protect the rights of the people. One
of his main points is the leaning towards a monarchy. He describes that it would be very easy for the President to become a king. Henry seems to
also contradict himself on this point when he says that he would rather have a king and lords than a chief who controls the army. Henry's final point
is about the creation of an absolute ruler. Like he says about the monarchy, it would be easy for this to happen. If the President has control of the army,
it would be easy to declare himself an absolute leader.
Richard Henry Lee is another Anti–Federalist who displays his views throughout his article. Lee discusses some arguments, but the main point of his
article is about how the Constitution came to be and the problems associated with it. He says "by making tender, suspension, and paper money laws,
have given just cause of uneasiness to creditors. By these and other causes, several orders of men in the community have been prepared, by degrees,
for a change in government" (Lee in Unger, p. 119). Lee believes that if these things had not occurred, the idea of a new government would have never
been thought of. Another point that Lee makes is about the delegates that were chosen to go to the convention. He says that the intentional purpose of
the convention was to amend

Federalist vs. Anti–Federalist
The road to accepting the Constitution of the United
States was neither easy nor predetermined. In fact during and after its drafting a wide–ranging debate was held between those who supported the
Constitution, the
Federalists, and those who were against it, the
Anti–Federalists. The basis of this debate regarded the kind of government the Constitution was proposing, a centralized republic. Included in the
debate over a centralized government were issues concerning the affect the
Constitution would have on state power, the power of the different branches of government that the Constitution would create, and the issue of a
standing army. One of the most important concerns of the...show more content...
46, James Madison addresses these concerns about the well being of the state governments under the Constitution. Madison argues that the interests of
the states will not be lost in Congress, because the loyalty of the legislator will be first to the people of his district and then secondly to the benefit of
the whole country. Madison says that the "members of the Federal
Legislature will be likely to attach themselves too much to local objects"(Madison 239). Madison tried to alleviate the concerns of the Anti–Federalist
concerning what type of recourse the states would have against Federal legislation by saying that the states would have powerful means of opposition
to any unfavorable or unwarranted legislation.
The powerful means of opposition Madison talks about is the displeasure of the people, whom Madison believes to be the fountain from which the
Federal government draws its power.
The second major concern of the Anti–Federalists was the power of Congress. It worried the Anti–Federalists a great deal that the Constitution would
grant Congress the power to tax in "necessary and proper" circumstances (Main 122). Not only could Congress pass new taxes without the consent of
the people or state governments, the Anti–Federalist also felt that the Congress would have control over the judiciary branch. If Congress had influence
over the judicial system, what recourse would the state have against unfair legislation? The

Federalists Essay
The early years of the Constitution of the United States were full of political strife. The two prominent political ideals were complete opposites. The
Jeffersonian Republicans were focused on giving power to the people and maintaining a pastoral economy, while the Federalists supported the
control of the government by the elite class, and maintaining "positive" democracy. Both parties feared the influence and effect the other party would
have on the public. In Linda K. Kerber's article, "The Fears of the Federalists", the major concerns Federalists held in the early 19th century are
described. Ever since the war with and separation from England, the citizens of America were seen to be continually drive to "patriotic rebellion" as a
way to...show more content...
Despite the vast amount of land available for agriculture, industry was created regardless, in order to become more independent from Europe.
Machinery was developed that would eliminate the need for actually laborers, but at the same time this machinery needed laborers to work it6. Thus
the Proletariat formed. This class was negatively viewed by the Federalists as they believed that any one who was dependent upon others was not
virtuous and thus not a proper citizen. The condition of the proletariat class was also poor, and the Federalists believed that the poor were more prone
to indecent behavior and unpredictability7. Kerber quotes Federalist Philip Barton Key, who stated that men and boys in workshops were not expected
to have the same stable constitution as those who were in charge of their own salaries and independent in their lives8. What is meant is that those who
are rich and assured of their social and economic standing are not going to rebel. They have influence in what matters to them politically, unlike those
who are poor, who would have more reason to start an uprising. Federalists also feared that the Republicans would "'...break down the 'barrier of
habitual morality...both as it respects our civil & religious institutions..."9. Of course, this referred to the cultivation of the public desire rather than the
elite rich and educated. As

Analysis: The Federalist Papers
The "Federalist Papers" were created as part of the political campaign of the North to further push the federalist views of a strong central government, in
which Hamilton, Madison, and Jay strongly argued their case. In Federalist paper 10, Madison strongly talks about the representative government that
the new system has; iterating that with representative government, this shows the diverse perspectives throughout the country. He also argues that there
will be less oppression with chosen politicians so like–mindedness of opinions does not occur. Additionally, Madison writes in, similar fashion,
Federalist paper #39 how the way to avoid an oppressive, tyrant leader is to have the president be voted by all of the citizens so not one social class
In fact, paper 10 expresses how a republic is necessary with the size of the country, which is still a factor due to the different beliefs, morals and
political views across the nation. Additionally Madison spoke about how the system is made to protect against their own injustice in paper #51;
where senators like Bernie Sanders, and Elizabeth Warren are vocal towards the corrupt leaders in today's presidency and cabinet. Paper #70 states
that by having a reliable and strong president it is the "definition of a strong government," this is still relevant today but vise versa. Trump siding with
the white supremacists, trying to kick out a religion, and banning transgender soldiers demonstrates the corruptness with the politicians, as was
conveyed in the paper. Ratification was also a leading argument of paper #39 that for the right purpose is used today; times change and so do the
morals of others with it, where ratification was used to legalize same–sex marriage bringing more equality to the LGBTQ+ community. Finally, paper
#57 exhibits that the leaders do not have to come from pretentious families, starting from Hamilton who was an orphan to Jimmy Carter, a peanut
farmer, having a representative government gives all backgrounds a voice for a more diverse leadership.
In conclusion, the "Federalist Papers" started out as a political platform to voice the opinions needed to have a federalist government consisting of
separation of powers, and checks and balances to keep corrupt politicians out of office. The same methods written by Hamilton, Madison and Jay
continues to be the foundation for the system put in place, having equal system to govern over the United

Federalism Essay
Federalism
Federalism is a system of government that divides power between a national government and a regional government with the use of a constitution.
Throughout the United States history, federalism has played a significant role in the constitution and the system of government adopted by the United
States of America. Federalism has also changed throughout the course of America's history to fit the constitution and the government. Montesquieu was
a French philosopher who was very important in the American constitutional thought. He was a man who was referred to more that any other
theoretical writer and wrote, "The Spirit of the Laws." Some of Montesquie's theories or views were that the Republic form of government was only
He also believed that a right is of two kinds–– power and property. Hume was a man that was lead by the influence of John Locke and George
Berkeley. Hume also believed that we should just keep and improve our ancient governments; hence, we prevent any new radical forms of government.
Federalism was incorporated in the constitution for many different reasons. One of the main reasons federalism was added was to prevent the new
form of government in the United States after the Articles of Confederation of abusing its powers. Under federalism, state governments and the national
governments would have specific limit, and rights. Some of the limits and rights on the national government were the right of habeus corpus, and
control of interstate commerce. States could not tax imports and exports, could not impair obligation of contracts. Federalism was created to ensure
both separate governments certain privileges. The Framers of the Constitution believed that the competition between both of the governments would
create an effective limitation on each governments power. The Federalist Papers, numbers forty–five and forty–six, were written by James Madison and
supported some of the ideas of federalism in them. In Federalist Papers 45, Madison wrote about "The Alleged Danger from the Powers of the Union
to the State Governments."

Federalism Essay
Federalism
The Constitution of the United States was drafted at a time when our country was in dire need of many answers to political and social questions. In
addition to many other things, the drafters of the Constitution were concerned with solidifying our central government and the Constitution was
intended to provide a solid structure from which our burgeoning nation could grow. The Constitution gave explicit powers to the federal government
and provided the states with the Tenth Amendment which states ,"Powers not delegated to theUnited States, nor prohibited to the states, are reserved to
the states respectively…" Of the enumerated powers given to the federal government by the Constitution, the interpretation of the...show more
content...
Dual Federalism also relies on the notion that in a court of law, the Tenth Amendment gives the states enough support to declare unconstitutional any act
of the national government that infringes on the reserved powers given to the states. Cooperative Federalism provides an entirely different view of the
relationship between the federal and state governments. Federal supremacy is the hallmark of this ideology. Supporters of the cooperative federalist
view prefer to employ a broad interpretation of the Constitution. The legal basis on which cooperative federalism has been argued is threefold: (1)
Enumerated powers (e.g. Commerce Clause) should be interpreted in light of an expansive Necessary and Proper Clause (2) The Supremacy Clause, as
prescribed in Article 6, paragraph 2, gives federal actions supremacy over state laws when made in pursuance of the Constitution and when they are
made using implied and enumerated powers (3) The Tenth Amendment does not give states the power to contest federal laws. To suggest that that these
two ideologies are contradictory is an understatement. To understand which theory best identifies with the correct interpretation of the Constitution, it
is necessary to understand the circumstances that created the necessity for a Constitution and the political circumstances that motivated decisions
contrary to the correct interpretation of the Constitution. The

Federalist 10 Paper
FEDERALIST #10
This paper is considered an important document in American history for it lays out how the writers of the constitution defined the form of government
that would protect minority rights from organized and united factions that intended to pass legislation injurious to the liberty of the minority or
detrimental to the good of the country.
The Federalist Papers, were a series of eighty five essays written by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison between October 1787 and
May 1788. The essays were published anonymously, under the pen name "Publius," primarily in two New York state newspapers of the time: The New
York Packet and The Independent Journal.
This essay, the first of James Madison's contributions to...show more content...
With pure democracy he means a system in which every citizen vote directly for laws. And with republic he intends a society in which citizens vote
for an elite of representatives who then vote for laws. He indicates that the voice of the people pronounced by a body of representatives is more
conformable to the interest of the community. Because again, common people's decisions are affected by their self–interest.
Then he makes an argument in favor of a large republic against a small republic for the choice of "fit characters" to represent the public's voice. In a
large republic where the number of voters and candidates is greater, the probability to elect competent representatives is broader. The voters have a
wider option. In a small republic it would also be easier for the candidates to fool the voters, while in a large one, harder.
The last argument Madison makes in favor of a large republic is, in a small republic there will be a lower variety of interests and parties, so more
frequently a majority will be found. The number of participants of that majority, will be lower, and considering they live in a more limited territory,
it would be easier for them to agree and work together for the accomplishment of their ideas. While in a large republic the variety of interests will be
greater so to make it harder to find a majority. Even if there is a majority it would be harder for them to

The Federalist Papers
Introduction
The Federalist Papers present a series of essays written by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay. This volume of eighty–five essays,
written between October 1787 and May 1788, is perhaps the most famous, and at the same time the most important newspaper column ever published.
These essays are considered to be among the most important documents of the Founding period, together with the Constitution and Civil Rights Act. In
these essays the authors provided facts and justification for the Constitution, with also raising and discussing some of the most important political
issues of the time. The sole purpose for writing the essays was to convince people of the State of New York to ratify the U.S. Constitution. People of
New York and its political leaders were strongly against the Constitution and they firmly opposed newgovernment. The main reason for that is the fact
that the State of New York gain independence under theArticles of Confederation and was becoming rich trough the trade. The citizens of this state
believed that they have no interest in ratifying the Constitution and joining the Union.
The writers of The Federalist Papers were very concerned that because of New York's reluctance and decided to take the matter into their hands and
came all the efforts in order to change their minds. They were very well aware of the relationship between human nature and popular government.
Hamilton, Madison and Jay were apprehensive of the ethics of the

Essay on Federalism
Federalism
Federalism is a widely accepted system of government in North American cultures. To many North Americans it seems to be the obvious choice for all
world governments, but this is not the case. In all honesty, federalism is a fairly unique form of government. Out of approximately two hundred nations
on the earth one hundred and eighty states practice unitary forms of government, leaving only twenty or so as federal nations (Winchester, 1999).
Unitary forms of government consist of only one level of government. These are very popular in modern day politics as they are much cheaper to run
and to maintain, while still fitting the needs of most countries. Examples of countries which use unitary governments include France,...show more
content...
Federalism has a rich and influential history in North America as well as in many other parts of the world. While it is widely believed that federalism
as a principle was the brainchild of the founding fathers of the United States of America, reference to federalism in an unrefined form was
documented in the early 1600's. It was in this time period that the Jewish convenant in response to social and religious persecution created "a new
doctrine of "federal theology" based on the idea of a mutual obligation between the ruler and the ruled" (Wijemanne, 1999). Essentially this was the
very first division of powers, and shared control over an area by two levels of government, all be it in a very crude form. A more contemporary and
widely accepted approach regarding the birth of federalism is that it was essentially created with the Declaration of Independence and the gradual
confederation of the American states in the late 1700's and early 1800's. The United States fits the mold most common with Federal states. Federalism
was first implemented in the United States because America contained a large plot of land which was filled with a very diverse population. Typically
the only way to unite a heterogeneous population is through a federal government because it is the only way to articulate and protect regional interests.
As the United States evolved so did federalism as an ideology and as a political practice. Constant amendments to the

Federalist Paper
Federalist Papers Federalist papers are a series of articles authored by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, which argued in favor of
ratifying the proposed constitution of the United States; the Federalist Papers outlined the philosophy and motivation of the document. Federalist No.
10, Madison analyzes the nature, causes and effects of factions, by which he meant groups of people motivated by a common economic and/or
political interest. Factions are both the product and prize of liberty, Madison argued that "by extending the sphere in which they can act, you make it
less probable that a majority of the whole will have a common motive to invade the rights of other citizens." Factions are perceived as a problem
because they mostly work against public interest, and infringe upon the right of others; this is why factions is endemic in popular forms of government,
because in popular governments, factions band together to advance their own self–interests at others' expense causing aggravation to the rest of the
community.
There are ways to control and cure...show more content...
Checks and balances were created as institutional safeguards to prevent one branch of the government from amassing to much power and influence;
the Checks and balances separate the powers that conform the powers of a country such as: legislative, executive and judicial power. The legislative
power is directed through the Congress, the executive power directed by the President, and the judicial power by the Supreme Court. Federalism is the
layered form of government that integrates the national government and the local state governments, as expressed in the 10th amendment of the Bill of
Rights. Last, the electoral college, is a system of indirect election in which the people chose electors whose allotment to the states according to the base
on number of

Federalist Paper 10
Federalist Paper Essay The Federalist Papers are a collection of eighty–five articles that explain the United States Constitution, written by Alexander
Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. The Federalist Papers were written in response to the Anti–Federalist attacks on the ratification of the newly
written U.S. Constitution in 1787. Federalist Paper 10 was authored by James Madison and published on November 22, 1787 under the pseudonym
"Publius." In Federalist Paper 10, James Madison addresses the question of how to guard against "factions." To accomplish this, James Madison
describes the meaning and importance of factions, explains how "Liberty is to factions what air is to fire," and elaborates on why a republic could
protect liberties...show more content...
Madison believed that a republic could protect liberties better than a democracy. Madison explains that if it's a minority faction, voting can fix this,
so a democracy can work here, but if it's a majority faction, a large republic can fix this. Firstly, Madison states that a direct democracy cannot control
the conflict of factions because the largest faction dominates and there would be no solution to protect the smaller factions against the actions of the
overpowering majority faction. Therefore, a direct democracy wouldn't be able to protect personal security or the rights of property. Secondly,
Madison argues that a large on the other hand would establish a government where representatives are selected to rule the people in order to protect
the minority from the tyranny of the majority. Madison feared that a direct democracy was bad because he thought the people weren't informed enough
which could lead to corruption. This is why Madison yearned for men with intelligence, passion and patriotism towards their country so they won't
make folly decisions, but he explains that the inverse may yet occur. Men of factious tempers, prejudice, and of sinister designs may as well betray the
interest of the people through corruption or intrigue. He argues a contradiction by explaining that the possibility of this occurring in a

Summary Of The Federalist Paper

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Summary Of The Federalist Paper