Department of Justice Government of India forwarded RTI request bearing registration No. JUSTC/R/2018/51094 to Patna High Court on 05.06.2018 for necessary action.

1. 6/6/2018 RTI Online :: Online RTI Information System
https://rtionline.gov.in/request/listActionStatus.php?action=EE5YlebEAVyOkDjHdVVG0oK%2FkJSSZnev0V8fIcXyN6U%3D%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20&&cod
FinalStatusof JUSTC/R/2018/51096
Applicant Name OM PRAKASH
Date of receipt 31/05/2018
Request Filed With Department of Jus ce
Text of Applica on
NON IMPLEMENTATION OF SECTION 7(1) OF RTI ACT RESULTED IN
PLANNED JUDICIAL MURDER OF APPELLANT NUMBER 02 SMT ASHA
RANI DEVI ON 11 TH NOV 2017 AND FORCED APPELLANT NO 01 OM
PRAKASH TO BECOME UNDERGROUND DUE TO IMMINENT DANGER TO
THE LIFE AND LIBERTY
This is with reference to RTI reply memo No. 438 dated 27.08.2016 by
C.J.M Cum PIO and FAA reply memo no.4036 dated 20.09.2017 by
District & Session Judge Cum Appellate Authority Civil Courts Begusarai
under the judicature of Patna High Court
Since ma er is same and jurisdic ons of two states are involved into it
and the same ma er has been se led by the Hon ble High Court of
Delhi in MATT. APPL. 7 of 2012 on 23.07.2013 therefore Department of
Jus ce is the competent authority to supply complete informa on.
Ma er pertains to imminent danger to life and liberty and N.B.W. has
been issued and kept it secret since 08.09.2011 against which Writ
Pe on (CRIMINAL) 136 of 2016 Writ Pe on CRIMINAL NO....OF 2017
D.NO.2188 Miscellaneous Applica on (CRIMINAL) 84 OF 2017 & le er
to CJI vide D.NO.78087 dated 23.05.18 have been filed before Supreme
Court of India and appellant no.02 Smt. Asha Rani Devi has been
succumbed to planned judicial murder on 11.11.2017 at New Delhi and
appellant no.01 Shri Om Prakash has been forced to become
underground due to imminent danger to his life & liberty. Shielded
Magistrate Ms. Meena kumari court no.16 Begusarai Court, under
Supreme Court of India dared to extend next date of hearing in non-
maintainable, false and frivolous Case No.5591 of 2013 on 28.06.2018.
1. Why no ce of appearance not being served on the accused within
two weeks from the date of ins tu ons of case on 07.02.2011
2. Why Magistrate did not order of arrest of the accused since 5 years
from the ins tu ons of case on 07.02.2011 to ll date
3.Why accused not being charge sheeted since 5 years from the
ins tu on of case on 07.02.2011 to ll date
4.Why did the first hearing has been fixed on 05.12.2013 a er Two and
half years of ins tu on of the case on 07.02.2011
5.Why Ld. district Court Begusarai supplied the informa on against
case no. 5591 of 2013 while the informa on was sought by the
pe oner against the case no. 9P/2010
6.What is the Correla on between case no. 9P of 2010 and case no.
5591 of 2013
7.Why Magistrate did not take the cognizance of replica on and
cancella on of NBW filed by the pe oner against the case no.9P of
2010 through his advocate on 03.03.2011 where it has been clearly
men oned that the complainant has appeared before the Ld. Trial
Court in case no. HMA 700 of 2010 at New Delhi and has inten onally
concealed this material fact from this Court
8.Why Magistrate did not order or direct the complainant to pursue
the HMA 700 of 2010 where she has already appeared on 09.02.2011
at New Delhi because the jurisdic on of case falls within South West
district of Delhi
A ached complete RTI request with Argument.
Request document (if any)
Status
RTI REQUEST APPLICATION RETURNED TO APPLICANT as on
05/06/2018
Date of Ac on 05/06/2018
Remarks
Remarks :- A similar RTI request bearing registra on No.
JUSTC/R/2018/51094 has already been forwarded to Patna HC for
necessary ac on.