SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 97
Download to read offline
Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Oleksandr Kazakov
January 28, 2015
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Outline
1 Treatment of motional and exchange narrowing in magnetic
resonance.
2 Algorithm approach on assignment and inversion of Liouville
Matrix.
3 STOL Ver. 1.0 for simulating stochastic lineshapes.
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Outline
1 Treatment of motional and exchange narrowing in magnetic
resonance.
2 Algorithm approach on assignment and inversion of Liouville
Matrix.
3 STOL Ver. 1.0 for simulating stochastic lineshapes.
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Outline
1 Treatment of motional and exchange narrowing in magnetic
resonance.
2 Algorithm approach on assignment and inversion of Liouville
Matrix.
3 STOL Ver. 1.0 for simulating stochastic lineshapes.
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Theory Overview
Hamiltonian for a nucleus in a randomly varying magnetic field
h(x, y, z):
H(t) = γh · If(t) (1)
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Theory Overview
Hamiltonian for a nucleus in a randomly varying magnetic field
h(x, y, z):
H(t) = γh · If(t) (1)
What will happen if we add a fixed magnetic field H0 along
positive x?
H(t) = γH0Iz + γh · If(t) (2)
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Theory Overview
Hamiltonian for a nucleus in a randomly varying magnetic field
h(x, y, z):
H(t) = γh · If(t) (1)
What will happen if we add a fixed magnetic field H0 along
positive x?
H(t) = γH0Iz + γh · If(t) (2)
[H(t), H(t) ] = 0
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Theory Overview
Probability of the emission of a photon with wave vector k and
frequency ω by the system from state |λ to its final state |α :
Pλα(k) =
| α|H(+)|λ |2
(ω + Eα − Eλ)2 + 1
4Γ2
(3)
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Theory Overview
Pλα(k) =
2
Γ
Re
∞
0
exp(iωt −
1
2
tΓ) λ|H(−)
|α α|U†
(t)H(+)
U(t)|λ ) dt
(4)
Where U(t) = exp(−iHt) and H(−) = H(+)†
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Theory Overview
P(k) =
λα
pλPλα(k) =
2
Γ
Re
∞
0
exp(iωt −
1
2
tΓ)( H(−)
H(+)
(t) )av dt (5)
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Theory Overview
Blume developed a solution for the lineshape:
P(w) =
2
Γ(2I0 + 1)
m1m0,m1 m0
I1m1|H(−)
|I0m0
ab
pa I0m0I1m1a|L−1
|I0m0m1b I0m0|H(+)
|I1m1 (6)
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Theory Overview
Propogator has a following form (s = iω):
L = s1 − W − i
j
V ×
j Fj (7)
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Theory Overview
Propogator has a following form (s = iω):
L = s1 − W − i
j
V ×
j Fj (7)
L = s1 − W − i
j
(Vj ⊗ Fj − Fj ⊗ Vj) (8)
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Theory Overview
For easier implementation we can also rewritte as:
P(s) =
2
Γ(2I0 + 1)
H(−)
δm1m0 H(+)
δm0m1
[sδabδm1m1
δm0m0
− (a|W|b)δm0m0
δm1m1
− i(a|F|a)δab[ I0m0|Vj|I0m0 δm0m0
− I1m1|Vj|I1m1 δm1m1
]−1
(9)
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Problem
Algorithm to generate arrays values and perform where index i and
j for Ai,j are composed of 3 subindices A(m0,m1,a),(m0,m1,b) in a
simplest case having only nuclear spin.
Ai,j = A(m0S,m1S,m0I ,m1I ,a),(m0S,m1S,m0I ,m1I ,b) =
[sδabδm1m1
δm0m0
− (a|W|b)δm0m0
δm1m1
− i(a|F|a)δab[ I0m0|Vj|I0m0 δm0m0
− I1m1|Vj|I1m1 δm1m1
]−1
(10)
It is possible to do assignment of Liouville Matrix by hand up to
size 8 × 8 but what if its size expands to 256 × 256 or
1 · 106 × 1 · 106?
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Where to go?
1 Matlab
Multidimensional arrays(N-D) implementation appeared in
recent Matlab 2014b
2 Java
Supports Multidimensional arrays implementation since 1995
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Where to go?
1 Matlab
Multidimensional arrays(N-D) implementation appeared in
recent Matlab 2014b
2 Java
Supports Multidimensional arrays implementation since 1995
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Algorithm Development in Stages
Generate 6-D array: A[a][b][m0][m1][m0][m1]
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Algorithm Development in Stages
Generate 6-D array: A[a][b][m0][m1][m0][m1]
Cast 6-D array into 2-D: A[a][b][m0][m1][m0][m1] → A [i][j]
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Algorithm Development in Stages
Generate 6-D array: A[a][b][m0][m1][m0][m1]
Cast 6-D array into 2-D: A[a][b][m0][m1][m0][m1] → A [i][j]
Perform 2-D array inversion: A [i][j] = A [i][j]−1
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Algorithm Development in Stages
Generate 6-D array: A[a][b][m0][m1][m0][m1]
Cast 6-D array into 2-D: A[a][b][m0][m1][m0][m1] → A [i][j]
Perform 2-D array inversion: A [i][j] = A [i][j]−1
Cast 2-D array back into 6-D array:
A [i][j] → A[a][b][m0][m1][m0][m1]
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Algorithm Development in Stages
Generate 6-D array: A[a][b][m0][m1][m0][m1]
Cast 6-D array into 2-D: A[a][b][m0][m1][m0][m1] → A [i][j]
Perform 2-D array inversion: A [i][j] = A [i][j]−1
Cast 2-D array back into 6-D array:
A [i][j] → A[a][b][m0][m1][m0][m1]
Go back to the equation 6 and do the summation.
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Algorithm Development in Stages
Generate 6-D array: A[a][b][m0][m1][m0][m1]
Cast 6-D array into 2-D: A[a][b][m0][m1][m0][m1] → A [i][j]
Perform 2-D array inversion: A [i][j] = A [i][j]−1
Cast 2-D array back into 6-D array:
A [i][j] → A[a][b][m0][m1][m0][m1]
Go back to the equation 6 and do the summation.
Plot the results.
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Encoding Table Example
A simple example of encription of 6 different combinations between
3 indecies that are used to cast back 6-D array from
2-D(A[a][:][m0][m1][:][:] → A [i][:]).
a, m0, m1 Output Count
1, 1/2, 1/2 → 000 1
1, −1/2, 1/2 → 010 2
1, 1/2, −1/2 → 001 3
2, 1/2, 1/2 → 100 4
2, 1/2, 1/2 → 101 5
2, −1/2, −1/2 → 111 6
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Code Sample
Java Method to store reference for the elements of 6-D array after
converting into 2-D array. Elements being converted and saved
into string format.
public static String[] genind(int m_0,int m_1, int a1 ){
int x=1;
String Y[] = new String[max];
for(int k=0;k<m_0;k++){
for(int l=0;l<m_1;l++){
for(int a=0;a<a1;a++){
Y[x-1]=String.format("%03d",a+10*k+100*l);
x++;
}
}
}
return Y;
} Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Code Sample
Casting 6-D array into 2-D:
for(int k=0; k<m_0;k++){
for(int l=0; l<m_1; l++){
for(int m=0; m<m_01; m++){
for(int n=0;n<m_11; n++){
for(int a=0; a<a1; a++){
for(int b=0; b<b1;b++){
tr[index(k,l,a,Y)][index(m,n,b,Y)]=matrix[a][b][k][l][m][n];
}
}
}
}
}
}
return tr;
}
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Code Sample
Converting from 2-D array back to 6-D array:
public static Object[][][][][][] matrixturn(Complex
tr[][], String Y[]){
for(int k=0; k<max;k++){
for(int l=0; l<max; l++){
hn[a1indback(k,Y)][b1indback(l,Y)][m0indback(k,Y)]...
[m1indback(k,Y)][m01indback(l,Y)][m11indback(l,Y)]=tr[k][l];
}
}
return hamatrixnew;
}
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Code Sample
Method for the extraction of element reference in 2-D array to that
in 6-D:
public static int m0indexback( int k, String Y[]){
int m0=0;
int f=Integer.parseInt(Y[k]);
m0=(int) Math.floor((f/100));
return m0;
}
public static int m1indexback( int k,String Y[]){
int m1=0;
int ff=Integer.parseInt(Y[k]);
m1=(int) Math.floor((ff-Math.floor(ff/100)*100)/10);
return m1;
}
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Code Sample
Method for the extraction of element reference in 2-D array to that
in 6-D to perform summation:
public static int a1indexback(int k,String Y[]){
int fff=Integer.parseInt(Y[k]);
int a1=0;
a1= (int) (Math.floor(fff-Math.floor(fff/100)*100)-...
Math.floor((fff-Math.floor(fff/100)*100)/10)*10);
return a1;
}
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
To illustrate that algorithm works Nuclear Zeeman Hamiltonian
was introduced of the form:
H = HIz + h · If(t) (11)
Where fixed magnetic field set along z−direction
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
NMR line shape for spin-1
2 nucleus in a fixed magnetic field
along z axis and fluctuating field along x axis
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 0.1
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 0.3
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 1
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 3
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 10
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 100
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
NMR line shape for spin-1
2 nucleus in a fixed magnetic field
along z axis and fluctuating field along z axis
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 0.1
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 0.3
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 1
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 3
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 10
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 100
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
NMR line shape for spin-1
2 nucleus in a fixed magnetic field
along z axis and fluctuating field along y axis. Jump rate
W = 0.1and100
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 0.1
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 1
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 1
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 3
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 10
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 100
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Plotting 3-D graphs using JZY3D OpenGL library
Figure: NMR line shape for spin- 1
2
nucleus in a fixed magnetic field along z axis and fluctuating field along z
axis. Frequency along x-axis, fluctuating field along y-axis and intensity along z-axis. Transition rateW = 0.1
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
ISTO Approach
Most important aspect of calculating matrix elements of Lioville is
keeping track of coordinate frames in which various quantaties are
defined. To unravel such comlications concept of irreducable
tensor operator(ISTO) should be intorduced:
T
(J,M)
i → T
(J,M)
f =
J
M =−J
T
(J,M )
i DJ
M ,M (Ξi→f )
Also spin Hamiltonian is a rank-zero tensor:
H(Ω) =
µ,m,l
F(l,−m)
ν,µ A(l,m)
ν,µ
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Zeeman Splitting
To account for the anisotropy of the Zeeman response to an
applied magnetic field, an effective Hamiltonian using a so-called g
tensor is used. Note that Hamiltonian has the following form:
Hzm = µBH · g · S
and thus Zeeman magnetic tensor and spin operators can be
written in principal axis frame as following:
F
[2](P)
±2(g) = −
1
2
βe(gxx − gyy) A
[2](P)
±2(g) = 0
F
[2](P)
±1(g) = 0 A
[2](P)
±1(g) = 0
F
[2](P)
0(g) = −
2
3
βe(gzz −
1
2
(gxx + gyy) A
[2](P)
0(g) = −
2
3
SzHz
F
[0](P)
0(g) =
1
√
3
(gxx + gyy + gzz A
[0](P)
0(g) =
1
√
3
)
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Coordinate Frames Transformation
F
[l](L)
m(g) = (Dl
m,2(ΩL→P ) + Dl
m,−2(ΩL→P ))∗F
[2](P)
2(g) + (Dl
m,0(ΩL→P ))∗F
[2](P)
0(g)
F tensor components should satisfy identity:
(F
[l]
q )∗ = (−1)2+qF
[l]
−q
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Coordinate Frames Transformation(Explicit)
F
[2],(L)
1(g) = −(F
[2],(L)
−1(g) )∗
= −e−iα
([sin(β)cos(β)cos(2γ) − isin(β)sin(2γ)]F
2(P)
2(g) −
3
2
sin(β)cos(β)F
2(P)
0(g) )
F
[2],(L)
0(g) =
3
2
sin2
(β)cos(2γ)F
2(P)
2(g) +
1
2
(3cos2
(β) − 1)F
2(P)
0(g)
F
[2],(L)
2(g) = (F
[2],(L)
−2(g) )∗
= ei2α
([
1 + cos2(β)
2
cos(2γ) + icos(β)sin(2γ)]F
2(P)
2(g) +
3
8
sin2
(β)F
2(P)
0(g) )
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Zeeman Splitting
Now we all set to construct Hamiltonian where all quantities are
evaluated in the lab frame:
Hzm = A
[2]
0 F
[2]
0 + A
[0]
0 F
[0]
0
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Abstracting from Blume simplified two-state model
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Octahedron
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Zeeman Splitting Lineshape
W = 0.1
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Zeeman Splitting Lineshape
W = 0.5
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Zeeman Splitting Lineshape
W = 1
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Zeeman Splitting Lineshape
W = 3
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Zeeman Splitting Lineshape
W = 10
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Zeeman Splitting Lineshape
W = 100
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
In EPR, it is important to consider hyperfine interaction between
the EPR active electron and neighboring nuclei. Most general
Hamiltonian has the following form:
Hhf = I · A · S
Hyperfine tensor
and spin operators can be written in principal axis frame as following:
F
[2](P)
±2(hf) = −
1
2
βe(Axx − Ayy) A
[2](P)
±2(hf) = −
1
2
S±I±
F
[2](P)
±1(hf) = 0 A
[2](P)
±1(hf) = ±
1
2
(S±Iz + SzI±)
F
[2](P)
0(hf) = −
2
3
βe(Azz −
1
2
(Axx + Ayy)) A
[2](P)
0(hf) = −
2
3
SzIz −
1
4
(S+I− + S−I+)
F
[0](P)
0(hf) =
1
√
3
(Axx + Ayy + Azz) A
[0](P)
0(hf) =
1
√
3
SzIz −
1
4
(S+I− + S−I+)
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
In the same manner as Zeeman Hamiltonian we can rewritte:
Hhf = A
[2]
0 F
[2]
0 + A
[0]
0 F
[0]
0 + A
[2]
1 (F
[2]
1 )∗
+ A
[2]
−1F
[2]
1
so generalizing:
Hres = Hzm + Hhf
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Slides with both Hyperfine and Zeeman coupling S-I 1/2 at Low
Field(H=8)
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 0.1
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 0.3
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 1
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 3
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 10
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 100
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Slides with both Hyperfine and Zeeman coupling S(1/2)-I(1/2) at
high field.H = 12 · 103
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 0.1
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 0.3
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 1
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 3
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 10
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 100
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Hyperfine and Zeeman splitting for spins S(1/2)-I(1) coupling
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 0.1
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 0.3
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 1
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 3
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 10
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 0.1, H = 100
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 0.3
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 1
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 3
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 10
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Results
W = 0.01, H = 2 · 105
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
Conclusion:
Algorithm for populating and inverting stochastic luneshape
have been developed and succesfully tested.
Developed algorithm is universal not only to stochastic indices
but spin values can be varied as well.
Ongoing Work:
Efficiency of the computationg have to be boosted and
currently code have been transferred to the Matlab.
Extending possible number of stochastic and quantum states
for coupled S − I spins.
Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape

More Related Content

What's hot

Further Results On The Basis Of Cauchy’s Proper Bound for the Zeros of Entire...
Further Results On The Basis Of Cauchy’s Proper Bound for the Zeros of Entire...Further Results On The Basis Of Cauchy’s Proper Bound for the Zeros of Entire...
Further Results On The Basis Of Cauchy’s Proper Bound for the Zeros of Entire...IJMER
 
Stability Analysis and Controller Synthesis for a Class of Piecewise Smooth S...
Stability Analysis and Controller Synthesis for a Class of Piecewise Smooth S...Stability Analysis and Controller Synthesis for a Class of Piecewise Smooth S...
Stability Analysis and Controller Synthesis for a Class of Piecewise Smooth S...Behzad Samadi
 
Btech_II_ engineering mathematics_unit5
Btech_II_ engineering mathematics_unit5Btech_II_ engineering mathematics_unit5
Btech_II_ engineering mathematics_unit5Rai University
 
WE4.L09 - MEAN-SHIFT AND HIERARCHICAL CLUSTERING FOR TEXTURED POLARIMETRIC SA...
WE4.L09 - MEAN-SHIFT AND HIERARCHICAL CLUSTERING FOR TEXTURED POLARIMETRIC SA...WE4.L09 - MEAN-SHIFT AND HIERARCHICAL CLUSTERING FOR TEXTURED POLARIMETRIC SA...
WE4.L09 - MEAN-SHIFT AND HIERARCHICAL CLUSTERING FOR TEXTURED POLARIMETRIC SA...grssieee
 
Btech_II_ engineering mathematics_unit4
Btech_II_ engineering mathematics_unit4Btech_II_ engineering mathematics_unit4
Btech_II_ engineering mathematics_unit4Rai University
 
Spacey random walks and higher-order data analysis
Spacey random walks and higher-order data analysisSpacey random walks and higher-order data analysis
Spacey random walks and higher-order data analysisDavid Gleich
 
Fuzzy join prime semi l ideals
Fuzzy join prime semi l idealsFuzzy join prime semi l ideals
Fuzzy join prime semi l idealsAlexander Decker
 
11.fuzzy join prime semi l ideals
11.fuzzy join prime semi l ideals11.fuzzy join prime semi l ideals
11.fuzzy join prime semi l idealsAlexander Decker
 
11.[1 7]fuzzy join prime semi l-ideals
11.[1 7]fuzzy join prime semi l-ideals11.[1 7]fuzzy join prime semi l-ideals
11.[1 7]fuzzy join prime semi l-idealsAlexander Decker
 
Prims & kruskal algorithms
Prims & kruskal algorithmsPrims & kruskal algorithms
Prims & kruskal algorithmsAyesha Tahir
 
Hecke Operators on Jacobi Forms of Lattice Index and the Relation to Elliptic...
Hecke Operators on Jacobi Forms of Lattice Index and the Relation to Elliptic...Hecke Operators on Jacobi Forms of Lattice Index and the Relation to Elliptic...
Hecke Operators on Jacobi Forms of Lattice Index and the Relation to Elliptic...Ali Ajouz
 
Eh3 analysis of nonlinear energy harvesters
Eh3   analysis of nonlinear energy harvestersEh3   analysis of nonlinear energy harvesters
Eh3 analysis of nonlinear energy harvestersUniversity of Glasgow
 
Orthogonal Vector Spaces
Orthogonal Vector Spaces Orthogonal Vector Spaces
Orthogonal Vector Spaces Sohaib H. Khan
 

What's hot (20)

Further Results On The Basis Of Cauchy’s Proper Bound for the Zeros of Entire...
Further Results On The Basis Of Cauchy’s Proper Bound for the Zeros of Entire...Further Results On The Basis Of Cauchy’s Proper Bound for the Zeros of Entire...
Further Results On The Basis Of Cauchy’s Proper Bound for the Zeros of Entire...
 
On Uq(sl2)-actions on the quantum plane
On Uq(sl2)-actions on the quantum planeOn Uq(sl2)-actions on the quantum plane
On Uq(sl2)-actions on the quantum plane
 
Stability Analysis and Controller Synthesis for a Class of Piecewise Smooth S...
Stability Analysis and Controller Synthesis for a Class of Piecewise Smooth S...Stability Analysis and Controller Synthesis for a Class of Piecewise Smooth S...
Stability Analysis and Controller Synthesis for a Class of Piecewise Smooth S...
 
B.Tech-II_Unit-IV
B.Tech-II_Unit-IVB.Tech-II_Unit-IV
B.Tech-II_Unit-IV
 
Btech_II_ engineering mathematics_unit5
Btech_II_ engineering mathematics_unit5Btech_II_ engineering mathematics_unit5
Btech_II_ engineering mathematics_unit5
 
WE4.L09 - MEAN-SHIFT AND HIERARCHICAL CLUSTERING FOR TEXTURED POLARIMETRIC SA...
WE4.L09 - MEAN-SHIFT AND HIERARCHICAL CLUSTERING FOR TEXTURED POLARIMETRIC SA...WE4.L09 - MEAN-SHIFT AND HIERARCHICAL CLUSTERING FOR TEXTURED POLARIMETRIC SA...
WE4.L09 - MEAN-SHIFT AND HIERARCHICAL CLUSTERING FOR TEXTURED POLARIMETRIC SA...
 
Fem 3d solid
Fem 3d solidFem 3d solid
Fem 3d solid
 
Btech_II_ engineering mathematics_unit4
Btech_II_ engineering mathematics_unit4Btech_II_ engineering mathematics_unit4
Btech_II_ engineering mathematics_unit4
 
Spacey random walks and higher-order data analysis
Spacey random walks and higher-order data analysisSpacey random walks and higher-order data analysis
Spacey random walks and higher-order data analysis
 
Fuzzy join prime semi l ideals
Fuzzy join prime semi l idealsFuzzy join prime semi l ideals
Fuzzy join prime semi l ideals
 
11.fuzzy join prime semi l ideals
11.fuzzy join prime semi l ideals11.fuzzy join prime semi l ideals
11.fuzzy join prime semi l ideals
 
11.[1 7]fuzzy join prime semi l-ideals
11.[1 7]fuzzy join prime semi l-ideals11.[1 7]fuzzy join prime semi l-ideals
11.[1 7]fuzzy join prime semi l-ideals
 
B.Tech-II_Unit-V
B.Tech-II_Unit-VB.Tech-II_Unit-V
B.Tech-II_Unit-V
 
H0743842
H0743842H0743842
H0743842
 
UCSD NANO106 - 01 - Introduction to Crystallography
UCSD NANO106 - 01 - Introduction to CrystallographyUCSD NANO106 - 01 - Introduction to Crystallography
UCSD NANO106 - 01 - Introduction to Crystallography
 
Prims & kruskal algorithms
Prims & kruskal algorithmsPrims & kruskal algorithms
Prims & kruskal algorithms
 
Hecke Operators on Jacobi Forms of Lattice Index and the Relation to Elliptic...
Hecke Operators on Jacobi Forms of Lattice Index and the Relation to Elliptic...Hecke Operators on Jacobi Forms of Lattice Index and the Relation to Elliptic...
Hecke Operators on Jacobi Forms of Lattice Index and the Relation to Elliptic...
 
Eh3 analysis of nonlinear energy harvesters
Eh3   analysis of nonlinear energy harvestersEh3   analysis of nonlinear energy harvesters
Eh3 analysis of nonlinear energy harvesters
 
Orthogonal Vector Spaces
Orthogonal Vector Spaces Orthogonal Vector Spaces
Orthogonal Vector Spaces
 
1526 exploiting symmetries
1526 exploiting symmetries1526 exploiting symmetries
1526 exploiting symmetries
 

Similar to Oral Exam Slides

Comparative study of results obtained by analysis of structures using ANSYS, ...
Comparative study of results obtained by analysis of structures using ANSYS, ...Comparative study of results obtained by analysis of structures using ANSYS, ...
Comparative study of results obtained by analysis of structures using ANSYS, ...IOSR Journals
 
Metodo Monte Carlo -Wang Landau
Metodo Monte Carlo -Wang LandauMetodo Monte Carlo -Wang Landau
Metodo Monte Carlo -Wang Landauangely alcendra
 
Relative superior mandelbrot and julia sets for integer and non integer values
Relative superior mandelbrot and julia sets for integer and non integer valuesRelative superior mandelbrot and julia sets for integer and non integer values
Relative superior mandelbrot and julia sets for integer and non integer valueseSAT Journals
 
Relative superior mandelbrot sets and relative
Relative superior mandelbrot sets and relativeRelative superior mandelbrot sets and relative
Relative superior mandelbrot sets and relativeeSAT Publishing House
 
Dynamic stiffness and eigenvalues of nonlocal nano beams
Dynamic stiffness and eigenvalues of nonlocal nano beamsDynamic stiffness and eigenvalues of nonlocal nano beams
Dynamic stiffness and eigenvalues of nonlocal nano beamsUniversity of Glasgow
 
M. Dimitrijević, Noncommutative models of gauge and gravity theories
M. Dimitrijević, Noncommutative models of gauge and gravity theoriesM. Dimitrijević, Noncommutative models of gauge and gravity theories
M. Dimitrijević, Noncommutative models of gauge and gravity theoriesSEENET-MTP
 
Bound State Solution of the Klein–Gordon Equation for the Modified Screened C...
Bound State Solution of the Klein–Gordon Equation for the Modified Screened C...Bound State Solution of the Klein–Gordon Equation for the Modified Screened C...
Bound State Solution of the Klein–Gordon Equation for the Modified Screened C...BRNSS Publication Hub
 
Stability and pole location
Stability and pole locationStability and pole location
Stability and pole locationssuser5d64bb
 
Kittel c. introduction to solid state physics 8 th edition - solution manual
Kittel c.  introduction to solid state physics 8 th edition - solution manualKittel c.  introduction to solid state physics 8 th edition - solution manual
Kittel c. introduction to solid state physics 8 th edition - solution manualamnahnura
 
machinelearning project
machinelearning projectmachinelearning project
machinelearning projectLianli Liu
 
Perfect method for Frames
Perfect method for FramesPerfect method for Frames
Perfect method for Framesandreslahe
 
1- Matrices and their Applications.pdf
1- Matrices and their Applications.pdf1- Matrices and their Applications.pdf
1- Matrices and their Applications.pdfd00a7ece
 
Eigenvalues and eigenvectors
Eigenvalues and eigenvectorsEigenvalues and eigenvectors
Eigenvalues and eigenvectorsiraq
 
D. Vulcanov - On Cosmologies with non-Minimally Coupled Scalar Field and the ...
D. Vulcanov - On Cosmologies with non-Minimally Coupled Scalar Field and the ...D. Vulcanov - On Cosmologies with non-Minimally Coupled Scalar Field and the ...
D. Vulcanov - On Cosmologies with non-Minimally Coupled Scalar Field and the ...SEENET-MTP
 

Similar to Oral Exam Slides (20)

Comparative study of results obtained by analysis of structures using ANSYS, ...
Comparative study of results obtained by analysis of structures using ANSYS, ...Comparative study of results obtained by analysis of structures using ANSYS, ...
Comparative study of results obtained by analysis of structures using ANSYS, ...
 
Metodo Monte Carlo -Wang Landau
Metodo Monte Carlo -Wang LandauMetodo Monte Carlo -Wang Landau
Metodo Monte Carlo -Wang Landau
 
Relative superior mandelbrot and julia sets for integer and non integer values
Relative superior mandelbrot and julia sets for integer and non integer valuesRelative superior mandelbrot and julia sets for integer and non integer values
Relative superior mandelbrot and julia sets for integer and non integer values
 
Relative superior mandelbrot sets and relative
Relative superior mandelbrot sets and relativeRelative superior mandelbrot sets and relative
Relative superior mandelbrot sets and relative
 
Stability
StabilityStability
Stability
 
Dynamic stiffness and eigenvalues of nonlocal nano beams
Dynamic stiffness and eigenvalues of nonlocal nano beamsDynamic stiffness and eigenvalues of nonlocal nano beams
Dynamic stiffness and eigenvalues of nonlocal nano beams
 
M. Dimitrijević, Noncommutative models of gauge and gravity theories
M. Dimitrijević, Noncommutative models of gauge and gravity theoriesM. Dimitrijević, Noncommutative models of gauge and gravity theories
M. Dimitrijević, Noncommutative models of gauge and gravity theories
 
Polynomial Matrix Decompositions
Polynomial Matrix DecompositionsPolynomial Matrix Decompositions
Polynomial Matrix Decompositions
 
Bound State Solution of the Klein–Gordon Equation for the Modified Screened C...
Bound State Solution of the Klein–Gordon Equation for the Modified Screened C...Bound State Solution of the Klein–Gordon Equation for the Modified Screened C...
Bound State Solution of the Klein–Gordon Equation for the Modified Screened C...
 
Stability and pole location
Stability and pole locationStability and pole location
Stability and pole location
 
04_AJMS_157_18_RA.pdf
04_AJMS_157_18_RA.pdf04_AJMS_157_18_RA.pdf
04_AJMS_157_18_RA.pdf
 
04_AJMS_157_18_RA.pdf
04_AJMS_157_18_RA.pdf04_AJMS_157_18_RA.pdf
04_AJMS_157_18_RA.pdf
 
Kittel c. introduction to solid state physics 8 th edition - solution manual
Kittel c.  introduction to solid state physics 8 th edition - solution manualKittel c.  introduction to solid state physics 8 th edition - solution manual
Kittel c. introduction to solid state physics 8 th edition - solution manual
 
machinelearning project
machinelearning projectmachinelearning project
machinelearning project
 
G e hay's
G e hay'sG e hay's
G e hay's
 
Servo systems
Servo systemsServo systems
Servo systems
 
Perfect method for Frames
Perfect method for FramesPerfect method for Frames
Perfect method for Frames
 
1- Matrices and their Applications.pdf
1- Matrices and their Applications.pdf1- Matrices and their Applications.pdf
1- Matrices and their Applications.pdf
 
Eigenvalues and eigenvectors
Eigenvalues and eigenvectorsEigenvalues and eigenvectors
Eigenvalues and eigenvectors
 
D. Vulcanov - On Cosmologies with non-Minimally Coupled Scalar Field and the ...
D. Vulcanov - On Cosmologies with non-Minimally Coupled Scalar Field and the ...D. Vulcanov - On Cosmologies with non-Minimally Coupled Scalar Field and the ...
D. Vulcanov - On Cosmologies with non-Minimally Coupled Scalar Field and the ...
 

Oral Exam Slides

  • 1. Stochastic Theory of Lineshape Oleksandr Kazakov January 28, 2015 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 2. Outline 1 Treatment of motional and exchange narrowing in magnetic resonance. 2 Algorithm approach on assignment and inversion of Liouville Matrix. 3 STOL Ver. 1.0 for simulating stochastic lineshapes. Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 3. Outline 1 Treatment of motional and exchange narrowing in magnetic resonance. 2 Algorithm approach on assignment and inversion of Liouville Matrix. 3 STOL Ver. 1.0 for simulating stochastic lineshapes. Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 4. Outline 1 Treatment of motional and exchange narrowing in magnetic resonance. 2 Algorithm approach on assignment and inversion of Liouville Matrix. 3 STOL Ver. 1.0 for simulating stochastic lineshapes. Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 5. Theory Overview Hamiltonian for a nucleus in a randomly varying magnetic field h(x, y, z): H(t) = γh · If(t) (1) Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 6. Theory Overview Hamiltonian for a nucleus in a randomly varying magnetic field h(x, y, z): H(t) = γh · If(t) (1) What will happen if we add a fixed magnetic field H0 along positive x? H(t) = γH0Iz + γh · If(t) (2) Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 7. Theory Overview Hamiltonian for a nucleus in a randomly varying magnetic field h(x, y, z): H(t) = γh · If(t) (1) What will happen if we add a fixed magnetic field H0 along positive x? H(t) = γH0Iz + γh · If(t) (2) [H(t), H(t) ] = 0 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 8. Theory Overview Probability of the emission of a photon with wave vector k and frequency ω by the system from state |λ to its final state |α : Pλα(k) = | α|H(+)|λ |2 (ω + Eα − Eλ)2 + 1 4Γ2 (3) Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 9. Theory Overview Pλα(k) = 2 Γ Re ∞ 0 exp(iωt − 1 2 tΓ) λ|H(−) |α α|U† (t)H(+) U(t)|λ ) dt (4) Where U(t) = exp(−iHt) and H(−) = H(+)† Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 10. Theory Overview P(k) = λα pλPλα(k) = 2 Γ Re ∞ 0 exp(iωt − 1 2 tΓ)( H(−) H(+) (t) )av dt (5) Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 11. Theory Overview Blume developed a solution for the lineshape: P(w) = 2 Γ(2I0 + 1) m1m0,m1 m0 I1m1|H(−) |I0m0 ab pa I0m0I1m1a|L−1 |I0m0m1b I0m0|H(+) |I1m1 (6) Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 12. Theory Overview Propogator has a following form (s = iω): L = s1 − W − i j V × j Fj (7) Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 13. Theory Overview Propogator has a following form (s = iω): L = s1 − W − i j V × j Fj (7) L = s1 − W − i j (Vj ⊗ Fj − Fj ⊗ Vj) (8) Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 14. Theory Overview For easier implementation we can also rewritte as: P(s) = 2 Γ(2I0 + 1) H(−) δm1m0 H(+) δm0m1 [sδabδm1m1 δm0m0 − (a|W|b)δm0m0 δm1m1 − i(a|F|a)δab[ I0m0|Vj|I0m0 δm0m0 − I1m1|Vj|I1m1 δm1m1 ]−1 (9) Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 15. Problem Algorithm to generate arrays values and perform where index i and j for Ai,j are composed of 3 subindices A(m0,m1,a),(m0,m1,b) in a simplest case having only nuclear spin. Ai,j = A(m0S,m1S,m0I ,m1I ,a),(m0S,m1S,m0I ,m1I ,b) = [sδabδm1m1 δm0m0 − (a|W|b)δm0m0 δm1m1 − i(a|F|a)δab[ I0m0|Vj|I0m0 δm0m0 − I1m1|Vj|I1m1 δm1m1 ]−1 (10) It is possible to do assignment of Liouville Matrix by hand up to size 8 × 8 but what if its size expands to 256 × 256 or 1 · 106 × 1 · 106? Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 16. Where to go? 1 Matlab Multidimensional arrays(N-D) implementation appeared in recent Matlab 2014b 2 Java Supports Multidimensional arrays implementation since 1995 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 17. Where to go? 1 Matlab Multidimensional arrays(N-D) implementation appeared in recent Matlab 2014b 2 Java Supports Multidimensional arrays implementation since 1995 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 18. Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 19. Algorithm Development in Stages Generate 6-D array: A[a][b][m0][m1][m0][m1] Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 20. Algorithm Development in Stages Generate 6-D array: A[a][b][m0][m1][m0][m1] Cast 6-D array into 2-D: A[a][b][m0][m1][m0][m1] → A [i][j] Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 21. Algorithm Development in Stages Generate 6-D array: A[a][b][m0][m1][m0][m1] Cast 6-D array into 2-D: A[a][b][m0][m1][m0][m1] → A [i][j] Perform 2-D array inversion: A [i][j] = A [i][j]−1 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 22. Algorithm Development in Stages Generate 6-D array: A[a][b][m0][m1][m0][m1] Cast 6-D array into 2-D: A[a][b][m0][m1][m0][m1] → A [i][j] Perform 2-D array inversion: A [i][j] = A [i][j]−1 Cast 2-D array back into 6-D array: A [i][j] → A[a][b][m0][m1][m0][m1] Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 23. Algorithm Development in Stages Generate 6-D array: A[a][b][m0][m1][m0][m1] Cast 6-D array into 2-D: A[a][b][m0][m1][m0][m1] → A [i][j] Perform 2-D array inversion: A [i][j] = A [i][j]−1 Cast 2-D array back into 6-D array: A [i][j] → A[a][b][m0][m1][m0][m1] Go back to the equation 6 and do the summation. Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 24. Algorithm Development in Stages Generate 6-D array: A[a][b][m0][m1][m0][m1] Cast 6-D array into 2-D: A[a][b][m0][m1][m0][m1] → A [i][j] Perform 2-D array inversion: A [i][j] = A [i][j]−1 Cast 2-D array back into 6-D array: A [i][j] → A[a][b][m0][m1][m0][m1] Go back to the equation 6 and do the summation. Plot the results. Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 25. Encoding Table Example A simple example of encription of 6 different combinations between 3 indecies that are used to cast back 6-D array from 2-D(A[a][:][m0][m1][:][:] → A [i][:]). a, m0, m1 Output Count 1, 1/2, 1/2 → 000 1 1, −1/2, 1/2 → 010 2 1, 1/2, −1/2 → 001 3 2, 1/2, 1/2 → 100 4 2, 1/2, 1/2 → 101 5 2, −1/2, −1/2 → 111 6 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 26. Code Sample Java Method to store reference for the elements of 6-D array after converting into 2-D array. Elements being converted and saved into string format. public static String[] genind(int m_0,int m_1, int a1 ){ int x=1; String Y[] = new String[max]; for(int k=0;k<m_0;k++){ for(int l=0;l<m_1;l++){ for(int a=0;a<a1;a++){ Y[x-1]=String.format("%03d",a+10*k+100*l); x++; } } } return Y; } Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 27. Code Sample Casting 6-D array into 2-D: for(int k=0; k<m_0;k++){ for(int l=0; l<m_1; l++){ for(int m=0; m<m_01; m++){ for(int n=0;n<m_11; n++){ for(int a=0; a<a1; a++){ for(int b=0; b<b1;b++){ tr[index(k,l,a,Y)][index(m,n,b,Y)]=matrix[a][b][k][l][m][n]; } } } } } } return tr; } Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 28. Code Sample Converting from 2-D array back to 6-D array: public static Object[][][][][][] matrixturn(Complex tr[][], String Y[]){ for(int k=0; k<max;k++){ for(int l=0; l<max; l++){ hn[a1indback(k,Y)][b1indback(l,Y)][m0indback(k,Y)]... [m1indback(k,Y)][m01indback(l,Y)][m11indback(l,Y)]=tr[k][l]; } } return hamatrixnew; } Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 29. Code Sample Method for the extraction of element reference in 2-D array to that in 6-D: public static int m0indexback( int k, String Y[]){ int m0=0; int f=Integer.parseInt(Y[k]); m0=(int) Math.floor((f/100)); return m0; } public static int m1indexback( int k,String Y[]){ int m1=0; int ff=Integer.parseInt(Y[k]); m1=(int) Math.floor((ff-Math.floor(ff/100)*100)/10); return m1; } Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 30. Code Sample Method for the extraction of element reference in 2-D array to that in 6-D to perform summation: public static int a1indexback(int k,String Y[]){ int fff=Integer.parseInt(Y[k]); int a1=0; a1= (int) (Math.floor(fff-Math.floor(fff/100)*100)-... Math.floor((fff-Math.floor(fff/100)*100)/10)*10); return a1; } Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 31. Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 32. Results To illustrate that algorithm works Nuclear Zeeman Hamiltonian was introduced of the form: H = HIz + h · If(t) (11) Where fixed magnetic field set along z−direction Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 33. Results NMR line shape for spin-1 2 nucleus in a fixed magnetic field along z axis and fluctuating field along x axis Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 34. Results W = 0.1 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 35. Results W = 0.3 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 36. Results W = 1 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 37. Results W = 3 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 38. Results W = 10 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 39. Results W = 100 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 40. Results NMR line shape for spin-1 2 nucleus in a fixed magnetic field along z axis and fluctuating field along z axis Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 41. Results W = 0.1 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 42. Results W = 0.3 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 43. Results W = 1 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 44. Results W = 3 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 45. Results W = 10 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 46. Results W = 100 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 47. Results NMR line shape for spin-1 2 nucleus in a fixed magnetic field along z axis and fluctuating field along y axis. Jump rate W = 0.1and100 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 48. Results W = 0.1 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 49. Results W = 1 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 50. Results W = 1 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 51. Results W = 3 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 52. Results W = 10 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 53. Results W = 100 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 54. Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 55. Plotting 3-D graphs using JZY3D OpenGL library Figure: NMR line shape for spin- 1 2 nucleus in a fixed magnetic field along z axis and fluctuating field along z axis. Frequency along x-axis, fluctuating field along y-axis and intensity along z-axis. Transition rateW = 0.1 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 56. ISTO Approach Most important aspect of calculating matrix elements of Lioville is keeping track of coordinate frames in which various quantaties are defined. To unravel such comlications concept of irreducable tensor operator(ISTO) should be intorduced: T (J,M) i → T (J,M) f = J M =−J T (J,M ) i DJ M ,M (Ξi→f ) Also spin Hamiltonian is a rank-zero tensor: H(Ω) = µ,m,l F(l,−m) ν,µ A(l,m) ν,µ Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 57. Zeeman Splitting To account for the anisotropy of the Zeeman response to an applied magnetic field, an effective Hamiltonian using a so-called g tensor is used. Note that Hamiltonian has the following form: Hzm = µBH · g · S and thus Zeeman magnetic tensor and spin operators can be written in principal axis frame as following: F [2](P) ±2(g) = − 1 2 βe(gxx − gyy) A [2](P) ±2(g) = 0 F [2](P) ±1(g) = 0 A [2](P) ±1(g) = 0 F [2](P) 0(g) = − 2 3 βe(gzz − 1 2 (gxx + gyy) A [2](P) 0(g) = − 2 3 SzHz F [0](P) 0(g) = 1 √ 3 (gxx + gyy + gzz A [0](P) 0(g) = 1 √ 3 ) Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 58. Coordinate Frames Transformation F [l](L) m(g) = (Dl m,2(ΩL→P ) + Dl m,−2(ΩL→P ))∗F [2](P) 2(g) + (Dl m,0(ΩL→P ))∗F [2](P) 0(g) F tensor components should satisfy identity: (F [l] q )∗ = (−1)2+qF [l] −q Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 59. Coordinate Frames Transformation(Explicit) F [2],(L) 1(g) = −(F [2],(L) −1(g) )∗ = −e−iα ([sin(β)cos(β)cos(2γ) − isin(β)sin(2γ)]F 2(P) 2(g) − 3 2 sin(β)cos(β)F 2(P) 0(g) ) F [2],(L) 0(g) = 3 2 sin2 (β)cos(2γ)F 2(P) 2(g) + 1 2 (3cos2 (β) − 1)F 2(P) 0(g) F [2],(L) 2(g) = (F [2],(L) −2(g) )∗ = ei2α ([ 1 + cos2(β) 2 cos(2γ) + icos(β)sin(2γ)]F 2(P) 2(g) + 3 8 sin2 (β)F 2(P) 0(g) ) Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 60. Zeeman Splitting Now we all set to construct Hamiltonian where all quantities are evaluated in the lab frame: Hzm = A [2] 0 F [2] 0 + A [0] 0 F [0] 0 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 61. Abstracting from Blume simplified two-state model Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 63. Zeeman Splitting Lineshape W = 0.1 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 64. Zeeman Splitting Lineshape W = 0.5 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 65. Zeeman Splitting Lineshape W = 1 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 66. Zeeman Splitting Lineshape W = 3 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 67. Zeeman Splitting Lineshape W = 10 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 68. Zeeman Splitting Lineshape W = 100 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 69. In EPR, it is important to consider hyperfine interaction between the EPR active electron and neighboring nuclei. Most general Hamiltonian has the following form: Hhf = I · A · S Hyperfine tensor and spin operators can be written in principal axis frame as following: F [2](P) ±2(hf) = − 1 2 βe(Axx − Ayy) A [2](P) ±2(hf) = − 1 2 S±I± F [2](P) ±1(hf) = 0 A [2](P) ±1(hf) = ± 1 2 (S±Iz + SzI±) F [2](P) 0(hf) = − 2 3 βe(Azz − 1 2 (Axx + Ayy)) A [2](P) 0(hf) = − 2 3 SzIz − 1 4 (S+I− + S−I+) F [0](P) 0(hf) = 1 √ 3 (Axx + Ayy + Azz) A [0](P) 0(hf) = 1 √ 3 SzIz − 1 4 (S+I− + S−I+) Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 70. In the same manner as Zeeman Hamiltonian we can rewritte: Hhf = A [2] 0 F [2] 0 + A [0] 0 F [0] 0 + A [2] 1 (F [2] 1 )∗ + A [2] −1F [2] 1 so generalizing: Hres = Hzm + Hhf Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 71. Slides with both Hyperfine and Zeeman coupling S-I 1/2 at Low Field(H=8) Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 72. Results W = 0.1 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 73. Results W = 0.3 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 74. Results W = 1 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 75. Results W = 3 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 76. Results W = 10 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 77. Results W = 100 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 78. Slides with both Hyperfine and Zeeman coupling S(1/2)-I(1/2) at high field.H = 12 · 103 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 79. Results W = 0.1 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 80. Results W = 0.3 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 81. Results W = 1 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 82. Results W = 3 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 83. Results W = 10 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 84. Results W = 100 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 85. Hyperfine and Zeeman splitting for spins S(1/2)-I(1) coupling Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 86. Results W = 0.1 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 87. Results W = 0.3 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 88. Results W = 1 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 89. Results W = 3 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 90. Results W = 10 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 91. Results W = 0.1, H = 100 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 92. Results W = 0.3 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 93. Results W = 1 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 94. Results W = 3 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 95. Results W = 10 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 96. Results W = 0.01, H = 2 · 105 Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape
  • 97. Conclusion: Algorithm for populating and inverting stochastic luneshape have been developed and succesfully tested. Developed algorithm is universal not only to stochastic indices but spin values can be varied as well. Ongoing Work: Efficiency of the computationg have to be boosted and currently code have been transferred to the Matlab. Extending possible number of stochastic and quantum states for coupled S − I spins. Oleksandr Kazakov Stochastic Theory of Lineshape