HLT 540 GRAND CANYON ALL WEEK ASSIGNMENTS Just Click on Below Link To Download This Course: http://www.tutorialsexperts.us/product/hlt-540-grand-canyon-all-week-assignments/ HLT 540 Grand Canyon All Week Assignments HLT540 HLT 540 Grand Canyon Week 2 Assignment Evidence-Based Research Interview Details: Identify, analyze, and discuss the components that comprise a valid evidence-based research study.

1. HLT 540 GRAND CANYON ALL WEEK ASSIGNMENTS
Just Click on Below Link To Download This Course:
http://www.tutorialsexperts.us/product/hlt-540-grand-canyon-all-week-
assignments/
Or
Email us
HELP@TUORIALSEXPERTS.US
HLT 540 Grand Canyon All Week Assignments
HLT540
HLT 540 Grand Canyon Week 2 Assignment
Evidence-Based Research Interview
Details:
Identify, analyze, and discuss the components that comprise a valid evidence-based research study.
Based on the information compiled above, interview a health care leader about his/her experiences
related to using evidence-based research to drive changes in practices in his/her facility.
Write a report (1,000-1,250 words) of your findings. Include the following in your report:
1) The changes that the health care leader has been involved in implementing.
2) How strong did the leader feel the research on the topic was? Why?
3) Have they ever rejected research findings? Why or why not?
4) Include any concerns they have had or resistance they have experienced when implementing changes
based on research.
5) Analyze your findings as they apply to the components of evidence-based research.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the
Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

2. This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment;
therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the
assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
HLT 540 Grand Canyon Week 3 Assignment 1
Coyne and Messina Articles, Part 1 Analysis
Details:
1) In a paper (1,000-1,250 words), compare and contrast the major elements of the reports by Coyne et
al. and Messina et al., listed in the Module 2 Readings.
2) Complete the “Coyne and Messina Articles Analysis.” Study the information in the right-side column
related to the Coyne, et al. study, which identifies the required elements as found in the reading.
Complete the information for the Messina et al. article by identifying the required elements from the
article.
3) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the
Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
4) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment;
therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the
assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
Coyne and Messina Articles Analysis
As an example guideline, review the study components in the left-side column of the table below. Read
the study by Messina et al., and build the data in the right-side column with the key components in that
study.
Research Question:
Coyne: Do size and ownership type make a difference in the efficiency and cost results of hospitals in
Washington state? (Highlight p.164, second column, starting 15 lines from bottom to seven lines from
bottom.)
Messina:
How did the research question emerge from the review of literature in the article?

3. Coyne:
Built on an earlier study by Coyne on performance differences between multi-facility systems and
independent hospitals using two cost measures. Cited studies that used a range of variables to measure
differences in hospital performance, and noted that prior findings have been inconclusive in regard to
hospital size, although economies of scale were found.
Messina:
Independent Variables
Type:
Coyne:
Hospital size and hospital ownership structure.
Categorical
Messina:
Dependent Variables
Type:
Coyne:
Efficiency measures – continuous variables.
Cost measures – continuous variables.
Messina:
Design Elements
1. Quantitative vs. Qualitative
2. Sample Size
3. Method of sample selection
4. Experimental vs. control group?
5. Reliable and valid data instruments?
Coyne:
Quantitative 96
Picked all hospitals in state, except investor owned hospitals.

4. No
Used data that are commonly used to measure hospital efficiency and performance with high degrees of
accuracy (reliable), and data that are historically used and make sense to other hospital users (valid).
Messina:
Describe analysis.
What statistics were used?
Coyne:
Two-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Messina:
Did the researchers’ conclusions make sense, did they answer the research question, and did they
appear to flow from the review of the literature?
Did they explore control of extraneous variables?
Coyne:
They concluded that size and ownership type make a difference in reported levels of efficiency. Not for
profits seem to achieve higher performance levels, and medium and large not for profits operate more
efficiently than industry average. The same results were found for cost levels, in that size and ownership
type do make a difference, with medium sized hospitals reporting lower costs than large or small
hospitals.
Yes, when they called for national studies that controlled for case mix, scope of services, and payer mix,
all of which could have affected the results in this study in an unmeasured way.
HLT 540 Grand Canyon Week 3 Assignment 2
Assessing a Research Study
Details:
1) Choose a research study article of interest to you.
2) Refer to the study you choose and complete “Assessing a Research Study.”

5. 3) Identify an article that directly references your chosen study and compare it to your findings. Does this
article refute or confirm the study’s findings?
4) Write a paper (750-1,000 words) that analyzes and summarizes your findings.
5) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the
Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
6) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment;
therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the
assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
Assessing a Research Study
Review the study components in the left-side column of the form below. Refer to the study you chose,
and complete the data in the right-side column with the key components in that study.
Research Question:
How did the research question emerge from the review of literature in the article?
Independent Variables
Type:
Dependent Variables
Type:
Identify and Define the Study Design Elements:
1. Quantitative vs. Qualitative:
2. Sample Size
3. Method of sample selection: Explanation.
4. Identify and define the experimental and control groups?
5. Reliable and valid data instruments? Explain.
Describe analysis.
What statistics were used?
Did the researchers’ conclusions make sense, did they answer the research question, and did they
appear to flow from the review of the literature?
Did they explore control of extraneous variables?

6. HLT 540 Grand Canyon Week 4 Assignment
Coyne and Messina Articles Part 2 Statistical Assessment
Details:
1) Write a paper of 1,000-1,250 words regarding the statistical significance of outcomes as presented in
Messina’s, et al. article “The Relationship between Patient Satisfaction and Inpatient Admissions Across
Teaching and Nonteaching Hospitals.”
2) Assess the appropriateness of the statistics used by referring to the chart presented in the Module 4
lecture and the resource “Statistical Assessment.”
3) Discuss the value of statistical significance vs. pragmatic usefulness.
4) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide located in the
Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
5) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment;
therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the
assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment
HLT 540 Grand Canyon Week 5 Assignment 1
Broyles Textbook Practice Exercise
Details:
Complete “Practice Exercise 1” (page 157) and “Practice Exercise 11” (page 180) in the textbook. For the
data set listed, use Excel to extract the mean and standard deviation for the sample of lengths of stay for
cardiac patients. Use the following Excel steps:
1) Enter the data set into Excel.
2) Click on the Data tab at the top.
3) Highlight your data set with your mouse.
4) Click on the Data Analysis tab at the top right.

7. 5) Click on Descriptive Statistics in the analysis tool list.
6) Find the mean and standard deviation of the data sets.
7) Send the results to instructor via e-mail, along with your analysis of the description of the data set.
APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
HLT 540 Grand Canyon Week 5 Assignment 2
Coyne and Messina Articles Part 3 Spearman Coefficient Review
Details:
1) Write a paper (750-1,000 words) regarding the use of the Spearman rank correlation coefficient by
Messina, et al. in “The Relationship between Patient Satisfaction and Inpatient Admissions Across
Teaching and Nonteaching Hospitals,” listed in the module readings.
2) Comment on what variables were used; whether it answered the research question; and whether the
Spearman rank correlation coefficient is appropriately used, given the requirements of the Spearman rank
correlation coefficient.
3) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the
Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
HLT 540 Grand Canyon Week 6 Assignment 1
Yeung Analysis
Details:
1) Refer to “The Use of Electro-Acupuncture in Conjunction with Exercise for the Treatment of Chronic
Low-Back Pain” by Yeung, Leung, and Chow.
2) Complete “Yeung Analysis Worksheet.”
3) Examine the question the researchers were trying to answer and write an essay (500-750 words) that
explains why you feel the t-test was chosen. Choose one of the other tools studied so far in this course
and explain why it would not provide relevant findings.

8. 4) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the
Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
5) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment;
therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the
assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
Yeung Analysis Worksheet
What was the research question?
What were the independent variables?
What was the dependent variable?
What was the sample size and how was it chosen?
What was the experimental design and use of control group?
Were the instruments of measurement shown to be reliable and valid?
What data types were included?
Describe the statistics used, what they were used for, and the results.
What were the researchers’ conclusions? How did they answer the research question(s)?
How was error controlled?
Did you see any concerns with the research study? If so, what?
HLT 540 Grand Canyon Week 6 Assignment 2
Correlation between Two Variables
Details:
Use Excel to do a correlation between the following variables:
1) X – 2,5,5,6,6,7,8,9
2) Y – 1,2,2,3,4,4,5,5

9. This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment;
therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the
assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
HLT 540 Grand Canyon Week 6 Assignment 3
T-Test for Two Sample
Details:
A drug company is measuring levels of oxygenation in patients after receiving a test medication. As the
researcher, you are interested in whether Group I, which received the medication, has the same
oxygenation levels as Group II, which did not.
1) Group 1: 2,3,3,4,4,7,8,9
2) Group 2: 1,2,2,3,4,4,5,5,6,8
Use Excel to run a t-test for two samples, assuming equal variances, with an alpha value of 0.05. Run the
t-test and note:
1) Are you doing a one-tailed test or a two-tailed test (Excel will give you both)?
2) What is the probability that Group I is different from Group 2, using the p value? Is it significant against
the benchmark of p < .05?
APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment;
therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the
assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
HLT 540 Grand Canyon Week 7 Assignment 1
Broyles Textbook Exercise 1
Details:
1) Use Excel to complete “Exercise 1” on page 247 (Regression Analysis) in the textbook.

10. 2) Answer the questions at the end of the exercise.
3) APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment;
therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the
assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
HLT 540 Grand Canyon Week 7 Assignment 2
Broyles Textbook Exercise 7
Details:
1) Use Excel to complete “Exercise 7” on page 208 (ANOVA) in the textbook.
2) Answer the questions at the end of the exercise.
3) APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment;
therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the
assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
HLT 540 Grand Canyon Week 7 Assignment 3
Roddy and Ganz Assessments
Details:
1) Use “Roddy and Ganz Worksheets” to complete an assessment of the research studies: “Evidence-
Based Clinical Guidelines: A New System to Better Determine True Strength of Recommendation” by
Roddy et al., and “ICU Nurses’ Oral-Care Practices and the Current Best Evidence” by Ganz et al.
2) In a paper (1,000-1,250 words), analyze and support whether you believe that the changes
recommended are statistically valid and sound enough to make practice changes in a hospital.
3) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the
Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

11. 4) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment;
therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the
assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
Roddy Analysis Worksheet
Using the worksheet below, complete an assessment of the following article.
Roddy, E., Zhang, W., Doherty, M., Arden, N. K., Barlow, J., Birrell, F., et al. (2006). Evidence-based
clinical guidelines: A new system to better determine true strength of recommendation. Journal of
Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 12(3), 347-352. Retrieved
from.gcu.edu:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=20870724
&site=ehost-
live&scope=site”>http://library.gcu.edu:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true
&db=a9h&AN=20870724&site=ehost-live&scope=site
What was the research question?
What were the independent variables?
What was the dependent variable?
What was the sample size and how was it chosen?
What was the experimental design and use of control group?
Were the instruments of measurement shown to be reliable and valid?
What data types were included?
Describe the statistics used, what they were used for, and the results.
What were the researchers’ conclusions? How did they answer the research question(s)?
How was error controlled?
Did you see any concerns with the research study? If so, what?
Ganz Analysis Worksheet
Using the worksheet below, complete an assessment of the following article.
Ganz, F., Fink, N., Raanan, O., Asher, M., Bruttin, M., Nun, M., et al. (2009). ICU nurses’ oral-care
practices and the current best evidence. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 41(2), 132-138. Retrieved

12. from.gcu.edu:2048/login?url=http://proquest.umi.com.library.gcu.edu:2048/pqdweb?did=1780947491&sid
=1&Fmt=3&clientId=48377&RQT=309&VName=PQD”>http://library.gcu.edu:2048/login?url=http://proque
st.umi.com.library.gcu.edu:2048/pqdweb?did=1780947491&sid=1&Fmt=3&clientId=48377&RQT=309&V
Name=PQD
What was the research question?
What were the independent variables?
What was the dependent variable?
What was the sample size and how was it chosen?
What was the experimental design and use of control group?
Were the instruments of measurement shown to be reliable and valid?
What data types were included?
Describe the statistics used, what they were used for, and the results.
What were the researchers’ conclusions? How did they answer the research question(s)?
How was error controlled?
Did you see any concerns with the research study? If so, what?
HLT 540 Grand Canyon Week 8 Assignment 1
Proposal Development Paper
Details:
Write a proposal paper (1,250-1,500 words) for a major change project that you would like to lead.
Identify a health care issue that interests you and explain why.
Develop a rationale using evidence-based research, including:
1) The background.
2) Statistical findings.
3) Probable stakeholders.

13. 4) Logical conclusions.
Design an implementation plan for the project, including:
1) A communications plan.
2) Creation of a design and implementation team by roles.
List the strategies you would use to lead the team to success and identify potential obstacles that may be
faced, along with plans to deal with them.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the
Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
HLT 540 Grand Canyon Week 8 Assignment 2
Stakeholder Scenario
Details:
1) Read and complete “Stakeholder Scenario.”
2) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the
Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
Stakeholder Scenario
Goal: To convince a group of people to use a specific, new type of antibiotic for patients pre-operatively in
order to decrease surgical wound infections.
Scenario: You are a healthcare administrator that is trying to introduce a change in practice to a group of
stakeholders. Your goal is to help them understand the rationale and need for the change, and to get a
sense of the areas of resistance to the change. The change under discussion is to implement a new
antibiotic to be given one hour before surgery starts as a way of reducing post-op wound infections. The
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Studies (CMS) have indicated that timely pre-op application of
specific antibiotics is becoming a requirement and will be a publicly reported indicator on the CMS Web
site for your hospital. Thus, institution of this new procedure is something you really need to pull off.

14. As the administrator in this scenario, you will hear the initial responses of each of the stakeholders. You
will then be presented with several options for your response. Select the option you think is most
effective.
Review the stakeholders’ responses to the option you selected. According to their own perspectives and
prerogatives, the stakeholders will respond in different ways to each choice. Your goal is to achieve some
level of buy-in to the change.
Issues:
 The antibiotic is new and people aren’t familiar with it.
 Requires administration within one hour of the actual surgery start time.
 Requires administration by IV.
 Adds a step to the busy pre-op nurse’s work load.
 Saves the hospital $28,000 per year.
 Research shows wound infections down 47% with this new antibiotic if it is administered in a
timely fashion.
Players:
 Pharmacist: He’s learned about the new antibiotic through his research studies, and is excited
about using it.
 Pre-op Nurse: She is worried about having one more thing added to the pre-op activities list she
must complete before the patient goes to surgery, but she’s very interested in doing the right
thing for her patients.
 Surgeon: He hates government mandates, doesn’t like to be told what to do, generally has a
pretty good track record for his patients’ outcomes after surgery, but has no idea what his actual
rates of wound infection are.
 Finance Analyst: It’s all about the money. Don’t make it harder by concentrating on anything other
than the dollars.
Stakeholders’ Background Thinking
Pharmacist: I really like this idea, because this antibiotic is better and cheaper too. If we can standardize
to this antibiotic, I can save money by stocking only one antibiotic for surgery. It will save my staff time in
preparation also. This is a great idea for me and my department.
Pre-op Nurse: I am just worn out trying to keep up with all the changes they keep hitting us with. It’s hard
enough to do my job and remember to do things differently and use different items. Why can’t they give
me a break? Now I’ll have to start an IV as well as give a drug, and they are already pressuring me to get
the patient ready for the OR faster. Sometimes I just want to go home!! But I got into nursing to help
people, and if this really makes a difference, I guess I can suck it up.

15. Physician: The government makes me crazy! Those bureaucrats think they know how to practice
medicine better than I do. The last thing I need is some ivory tower academic telling me what antibiotics
to give! I’ve been doing this for 30 years, and I know what works and what doesn’t. The stupid hospital
better shut up and let me do what I know is right and stop telling me how to be a doctor. My patients like
me and that is what counts. I’m sure voting Libertarian in the next election!
Financial Analyst: I have been tasked to save this hospital hundreds of thousands of dollars this year, and
this one change will save us a bundle. Why are they all arguing? This change could save their jobs! Don’t
they get that it’s all about the money? I wish they’d just shut up and approve the change so we could go
get lunch.
Download Files