1. A
SEMINAR REPORT
ON
“ACTIVE SAFETY SYSTEM”
Submitted by:
Mr. N. V. SHELKE
Final Year
(Mechanical Engineering)
Guided by:
Prof. A. B. DIGHEWAR
Project & Seminar Guide
Dept. Of Mechanical Engineering
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
Janata Shikshan Prasarak Mandal’s
B. N. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, PUSAD.
ACADEMIC YEAR
2012-2013
2. CONTENTS
• INTRODUCTION
• CONCEPT OF ACTIVE SAFETY.
• NEED OF ACTIVE SAFETY SYSTEMS.
• VARIOUS ACTIVE SAFETY SYSTEMS.
• VARIOUS COMPONENTS ACTIVE SAFETY
SYSTEMS.
• DISADVANTAGES ACTIVE SAFETY SYSTEM.
• FUTURE TRENDS.
• CONCLUSION
REFRENCES
3. 1. INTRODUCTION
• The beginning of the 20th century heralded the advent
of the motor vehicle era.
• During the last decade, with the ability of making use
of materials like silicon in semiconductors, the
electronics industry has seen a kind of a revolution.
• Active safety systems make the most of these
relatively recent developments.
4. 2. CONCEPT OF ACTIVE SAFETY
• Initially let‟s see “Passive Safety Devices” are:
• On the contrary Active Devices are:
5. 3. NEED OF ACTIVE SAFETY SYSTEM
• Adverse trends for passive systems.
• Human error factor not accounted in passive
systems.
6. 4. VARIOUS ACTIVE SAFETY SYSTEMS
A. Near Object Detection
Systems
B. Run Off Road Warning
Systems
7. C. Adaptive Cruise Control
Systems
D. Collision
Warning/Avoidance
Systems
8. E. Driver Monitoring/
Warning Systems
F. Automated Highways and
Co-operative Intersections
9. G. Night Vision Enhancements Systems
H. Pedestrian Safety Systems
I. Call for Help
11. C. ABS (Anti-Lock Braking system)
If the wheels lock during braking, the brakes on that
wheel are momentarily released to maintain the
traction on the road.
D. ASR (Acceleration Skid Control)
ASR controls the torque supplied to that wheel.
13. 6. DISADVANTAGES
• Costly
• Complex
• Mass produce
• Minor glitches in the software.
14. 7. FUTURE TRENDS
• The increasing role computers are taking in today‟s
vehicles‟ safety, with luxury cars having as many as
60 microprocessors.
• Striking examples of this are the Mitsubishi HSR-6
prototype and the Volvo XC90 SUV.
15. 8. CONCLUSION
• Need of the hour.
• But all this finally boils down to „ONESELF‟. There
is no alternative to „ALERT AND SAFE DRIVING‟.
• The gist of the entire discussion is:-
“FATE MAY SAVE YOU ONCE, SAFETY WILL
ALWAYS”
16. REFRENCES
1. Mackey,M. and Hill., “The limitation of current seat belts in Europe”,
Tnuma: Injury, inflection and critical care,ISSN:1079-6061, May 1995,
pp.533-537.
2. Rikard Fredriksson & Yngve Haland, “Evaluation of a new Pedestrian Head
Injury Protection system with a sensor in the Bumper and lifting of the
bonnet‟s rear part.” Autoliv research, 2001, paper no.131.
3. Ching-Yao Chan, “Detection of Vehicular Crashes-System Characteristics
and Architecture” IEEE Transaction On Vehicular Technology, Jan.2002,
VOL. 51, NO. 1.
4. Donald F. Huelke, “Driver Stature Injuries and Airbag Deployment
Crashes”, Analysis Of UMTRI Crash Investigations, Aug.1998, pp.997-
1001.
5. Martinelli, N. and Boulanger, S., "Cadillac DeVille Thermal Imaging Night
Vision System," SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-0323, March 2000, Paper
Number: 2000-01-0323.
6. David S. Breed, Lori Summers, Jan Carlson and Michel Koyzreff,
“Development of an Occupant Position Sensor System to improve Frontal
Crash Protection” 400 Commonwealth Drive Warrendale, PA15096, 2004,
pp.53-62.