2. National Osteoporosis Society
Priorities and Plans for 2016
Aim 1:
Every person aged over 50 who breaks a
bone is assessed for osteoporosis and
managed appropriately.
Priority 1:
Extend coverage of Fracture Liaison Services
Priority 2:
Improve quality of Fracture Liaison Services
and osteoporosis services
3. New for 2016β¦
οDevelop and implement best
practice for identification and
management of vertebral
fractures
4. β’ FLS Implementation Group
β’ FLS Implementation Toolkit
β’ FLS Implementation Workshops
β’ UK FLS Clinical Standards
β’ Fracture Prevention Practitioner (FPP) Training
β’ Peer Review
β’ Service Delivery Team support
A National Approach to FLS
5. Service Delivery Team
Sonya Stephenson
Service Development
Project Manager
Will Carr
Service Development
Project Manager
Hilary Arden
Head of
Service Delivery
Tim Jones
Commissioning
Advisor
Mayrine Fraser
Service Development
Project Manager
Debbie Stone
Service Development
Project Manager
Fiona Gardner
Operation Projects
Officer
Henry Mace
Professional
Development Lead
Jo Sayer
Service Development
Project Manager
6. β’ Facilitate stakeholder engagement
β’ Help establish patient/care pathway
β’ Project manage commissioning/funding:
o The economic and business case
o Service specification
o Resource and capacity planning
β’ Work with commissioners to ensure services
are sustained.
How We Help
7.
8.
9. FLS Cost & Workforce Calculator
β’ Additional resource within the FLS-IT
β’ Designed for use by clinicians and Health
Boards to help develop an FLS
β’ Provides the βcostβ side of a cost/benefit table
for the FLS business case
β’ Uses estimates of fracture numbers either
from local audit or from using the FLS
Benefits Calculator
β’ Outputs: the numbers of staff, DXA, follow-
ups etc. required, bespoke to the service.
10. FLS Implementation Workshops
2 workshops planned for 2016:
South Central & NE London
Rebecca Gear, Osteoporosis specialist
nurse practitioner, Care UK: βI feel
confident in going forward and have a plan
in mind. A must have workshop when
wanting to start an FLS.β
Dr Madhavi Vindlacheruvu, Consultant
Orthogeriatrician, Cambridge
University Hospitals: βExcellent to be
able to present 1st draft of business case.
Great expertise and support, really well
organised.β
11. β’ Provide input to support the development of
an FLS to meet the Clinical Standards
β’ Identify gaps in service provision, put in place
improvement plans and monitor against
agreed actions
β’ Help establish data collection, analysis,
evaluation and reporting
β’ Peer review.
How We Help
12. UK FLS Clinical Standards
Summary of Standards
CRITERIA RATIONALE MEASURES OUTCOMES
Identification
1 All patients aged 50 years and over with a new fragility
fracture or a newly reported vertebral fracture, whether
managed as inpatients or outpatients, will be systematically
and proactively identified.
Patients who have sustained a
fracture are at higher relative risk of
fracture than those who have not.
Targeted interventions in this
population will have most impact on
reducing future fracture burden.
Proportion of fracture patients aged
over 50 years identified by the FLS.
Denominator for all fragility fractures
can be best estimated by multiplying
total hip fractures in over 50 year
olds by 5 (1).
Systematic identification of at
risk patient population who
would benefit from investigation.
Investigation
2 Patients will have a bone health assessment and their need
for a comprehensive falls risk assessment will be evaluated
within 3 months of the incident fracture.
Assessments need to be conducted
promptly as the risk of having a further
fracture is increased in the first year.
% of identified patients who have a
bone health assessment within 3
months of incident fracture.
% of identified patients who have
their need for a falls risk assessment
evaluated within 3 months of
incident fracture.
Improved identification of the
population who will benefit from
interventions leading to
appropriate targeting of
resources.
Information
3 All patients identified will be offered written information about
bone health, lifestyle, nutrition and bone-protection
treatments.
Anyone aged over 50 years who has
had a fracture needs to be aware of
the steps they can take to maintain
healthy bones.
% of identified patients given
information.
Improved patient understanding
leading to confident self-
management and engagement
with recommended
interventions.
Intervention
4 Patients at risk of further fracture will be offered appropriate
bone-protection treatments.
Appropriately targeted interventions
reduce future fracture risk.
% of assessed patients offered
bone-protection treatment.
The right people receive the
right interventions for bone
health and falls leading to
reduced fracture risk and fewer
fractures.
Patient mobility and
independence is maintained.
5 Patients at risk of further falls will be offered appropriate
assessment or interventions to reduce future falls.
Evidence-based falls interventions are
effective at reducing falls risk.
% of assessed patients offered
referral for assessment or an
intervention.
14. Fracture Prevention Practitioner
(FPP) Training
β’ Officially launched April 2015 @ BSR
β’ 420 healthcare professionals registered
β’ 98 accredited FPPs
β’ Accessed by 91 different hospital trusts and
GP practices
β’ Endorsed by 10 leading educational and
professional bodies
β’ Accessed from across 15 different countries
(US, AUS, NZ, SA, CA, ROI, FR)
15. 15
Peer Review
β’ A means of assessing clinical care against agreed
standards
β’ Addresses agendas of clinical governance, practitioner
revalidation, and service development
β’ Facilitates a quality assured level of care for patients
with osteoporosis and metabolic bone diseases.
16. 16
FLS Coverage England NI/IOM Scotland Wales UK
2015
FLS Coverage
47/141
(33%)
4/6
(80%)
7/14
(50%)
6/11
(55%)
64/171
(37%)
Supporting new
service
development
38 0 2 4 44
Supporting
quality
improvement
40 6 12 6 64
Number of
additional sites
in contact
31 3 2 6 42
Total/Potential
number of FLS
109/141
(77%)
9/9
(100%)
16/16
(100%)
16/16
(100%)
150/182
(82%)
No. of services
commissioned
7 0 0 0 7
FLS Implementation
To Date
What have we done?
Top down with FLS-IG β National Stakeholders & Government (both NHS England and Public Health England)
Bottom up with Service Delivery Team through direct contact and support using the relevant resources developed
SDT provides bespoke individualised support to services:
Project management for commissioning of FLS
Reports
Mentoring of services
Launched February 2015
Over 52 hospital trusts have used/are using the Toolkit to develop or improve an FLS
Instrumental in securing funding
Endorsed by 6 leading professional bodies
Currently being reviewed by NHSE and NICE for endorsement
Additional resource within the FLS-IT
Designed for use by hospitals, community services and commissioning organisations to help develop an FLS
Estimates the benefits in terms of reduced fragility fracture incidence and cost savings that can be realised in a local health economy as a result of implementing an effective FLS.
Currently being developed
3 workshops in 2015
Attended by over 67 healthcare professionals
Engaged with over 25 hospital trusts
In the UK weβve developed these standards as criteria for the ingredients in the cake recipe.
The UK standards compliment the IOF Capture the Fracture Standards and in no way contradict them. However, they do not have the levels of Bronze, Silver, Gold.
The gap analysis is our starting point for any visit, even if a locality says they have nothing, we still tend to do this as there is always something happening!
Looking at Identification, where are you at???
Little service provision β so needs a full FLS
Good service provision β but needs to add on identification of spinal fractures.
Also bone densitometry training
Osteoporosis Conference
Peer Review of osteoporosis and metabolic bone services, including FLS where present
To provide review and quality assurance to improve performance based around professional credibility
Appraisal of services against agreed criteria to advance and develop clinical practice and service provision for the good of patients
Updated 03/2/16
Supporting New Service Development β assisting in the implementation of new services where no FLS exists
Supporting Quality Improvement β providing peer support with regards efficiency of existing services; and quality improvement through commissioning of additional staff/resources for an existing service
Additional sites in contact β contact made with potential FLS sites but no measurable service implementation or quality improvement work has yet taken place
Number of services commissioned β sites/areas where new FLS have been successfully commissioned or existing services have been enhanced through successful commissioning. NB these are not in addition to the totals above; they represent a commissioning/business case success but sites will continue to require on-going support as the new services come βon-lineβ
David is correct β there are 14 health boards in Scotland but I have not done in by health boards β I have done by hospital sites β e.g GGC has 1.4 million population and has 5 large hospital sites.
I will try to explain below but am around if you need to phone me:
Ayrshire & Arran β x1
Borders β x1
Dumfries & Galloway β x1
Fife β x1
Forth Valley β x1
Grampian- x1
GGC β x5
Highland β x1
Lanarkshire β x1
Lothian β x1
Orkney β Grampian said to include within their site as they take mobile DXA there x 2 year
Shetland - Grampian said to include within their site as they take mobile DXA there x 2 year
Tayside β x1
Western Isles β x1
So that is where 16 came from instead of 14.
I understand his point and am happy to change.
However I donβt really know where we would class Orkney and Shetland yet as I need to catch up with Dr Hollick. I know Grampian reports the scans but regards FLS β it is all a bit delicate up there are you may recall. They donβt want any input from me.
Updated 3/2/16
Green = new services being developed from scratch (nothing)
Blue = contact only at this stage
Purple = quality improvement of service through peer support
Yellow = quality improvement of service through additional commissioning
Updated 13/1/16 (FLS Benefits Calculator v2.8)
Bradford population includes Bradford City CCG and Bradford District CCG
East Sussex population includes Hastings & Rother CCG, and Eastbourne Hailsham & Seaford CCG
Epsom is based at St Helier Hospital, population includes Merton and Sutton CCGs combined
Salisbury population is 30% that of Wiltshire CCG
Stoke population shown here is that of N.Staffs CCG (since that was the CCG that was found through peer review not to be commissioning the service. As a result of peer review, N.Staffs CCG approved funding of the service too).