20 hand out on cp assessment methodology -samantha
Fall 2015 Final Presentation
1. End of Term Presentation: Fall 2015
Nathan Lex
CBG Tech Services Co-op
Term 4 of 5
2. About Me
From Dublin, Ohio
Fourth Co-op with Marathon
– Canton Fall 2013
– Canton Summer 2014
– Cincinnati Spring 2015
Education
– Fourth year at the University of Cincinnati
– Bachelor’s in Chemical Engineering
– Graduate Spring of 2017
2
3. Goals for the Fall
My Goals
Personal Goals
– Take on as many unit engineer
responsibilities as I can
– Get the chance to learn a new unit and
understand how it is integrated with
the rest of the refinery
Professional Goals
– Strengthen communication skills
– Strengthen technical knowledge on
unit/tower design
3
4. Projects and Responsibilities
CFU Max Rate Test
– Field data collection
– Mass and Energy Balance
– Post Audit Memo
Deepcut TAR
– Deepcut PI Graphics
CFU/LEP FOE Metrics
Spring 2015 Bundle Cleaning Program Memo
4
5. CFU Max Rate Test
Scope of Work
Complete CFU Max Rate test
– Assisted operations with temperature
and pressure surveys around all heat
exchangers and pumps
– Collected routine and non-routine
samples during varying step test rates
Results
Mass and Energy Balance
– CFU Charge Rate: 40 MBPD
– CFU Charge Rate: 46.2 MBPD
Recommendations for future process
improvement
Post-rate test memo
5
6. Deepcut TAR: South End
Scope of Work
Internal vessel and tower inspections
– Mechanical damage & Cleanliness
FCO & PSSR Walk-downs
Tracking Heat Exchanger bundle cleaning &
collecting samples
Mic’d and verified orifice plate installation
PI Graphics
– Update graphics to show new equipment and circuits
6
9. CFU/LEP FOE (Focused on Energy) Metrics
9
Scope of Work:
Identify energy metric points within the unit to track
Develop FOE metrics and implement in UPM and Optimization Envelope
Results
Worked with Design Engineer and Energy Technologist to determine energy
targets on the identified metric points
Developed five metrics within the CFU
– Steam to Feed Ratios: Dehex, Debut and Deprop Towers
– Absorbed Duty to Feed Ratio: Naphtha Splitter
– Excess %O2: Naphtha Fired Reboiler
Developed two metrics within the LEP
– Absorbed Duty to Feed Ratio: Dehex
– Excess %O2: Dehex Fired Reboiler
Drafted memo
10. Bundle Cleaning Program-Spring 2015
Scope of Work
Analyze pre and post-cleaning data on all exchangers cleaned in the Spring
2015
Determine the economic/operational benefit of cleaning each bundle
– Heater duty gains
– Reducing hydraulic limitations
– Avoiding NTE limit
Results
Developed justifications and incentives for bundles that were cleaned
Drafted post-audit memo
10
11. My Experience
My Experience
Received the opportunity to take on
greater responsibility
– TAR
– CFU Rate Test
– FOE Metrics
Lessons Learned
– Challenging my assumptions prior to
drawing a conclusion
Take Away
– Greater understanding on unit
integration and tower design
– Greater confidence as an engineer
11
12. Special Thanks
Mentor: Rob Dugan
Supervisors: Wayne Kinnel & Greg Peach
TAR Group: Liz Chapman, Nic Adams, Devon Hill & Olivia Fischer
Tech Service Department
Everyone at the Catlettsburg Refinery who made this fall a great learning
experience!
12
13. Questions
Please feel free to ask me any questions you may have about my experience
here at Catlettsburg Refining LLC!
13
Editor's Notes
Introduce yourself
Overview
About Me
Goals
Projects
Questions
Personal Goals
Unit Engineer Responsibilities
Learn new unit and how it’s integrated
Professional Goals
Communication Skills
Being able to communicate effectively with others has been a goal every term
Work at higher efficiency when able to communicate effectively
Unit/Tower Design
Process design class upcoming semester
Increased understanding as to why towers are designed with different types of technologies
Scope
Complete rate test
Got the chance to help with completion of the rate test
Temperature/pressure surveys
Collected routine/non-routine samples
Results
Completed mass and energy balance during two rates: 40 and 46.2 MBPD
Developed recommendations for future process optimizations
Deprop ovhd liquid control valve and flow transmitter (changed this week)
Deprop ovhd flare vent control valve
(Naphtha Splitter bottoms pumps were operating at the end of their curve at max rate and are unit limitation)
(Heater Duty limit at 55 MMBTU/hr due to environmental compliance with NOx emissions)
Drafted and completed post-rate test memo
Learning Opportunities
Opportunity to work in a new unit
Chance to make comparison to the Utica fractionator that is in Canton
Completing mass and energy balance increased understanding on how heat integration within units is optimized
Greater written communication abilities
Scope of Work
Vessel inspections
FCO Walkdowns
Sole responsibility for tracking all bundles being pulled on night shift
Mic’d orifice plates
Verified orifice plate installation
Updated PI Graphics to show changes, updates, new process circuits
Learning Opportunities
Hands on experience/Visual learning
New experience having to communicate with contracted employees
Ability to discover why equipment was designed as it was through visual reasoning without having to ask why
Received the opportunity to take on greater responsibilities
New graphic more detailed
**Explain What an FOE is**
Scope of Work
Identify energy consumption points within CFU/LEP
Develop FOE metrics and add to UPM/Optimization Envelope
Results
Chance to reach out to design engineer and energy technologist for direction
Developed five FOE metrics for CFU
Developed one FOE metric for LEP
Metrics set off of tower product quality specifications
Wrote memo
Learning Opportunities
Greatly strengthened understanding on why similar towers are designed differently
Naphtha Splitter with Fired Reboiler vs. Debutanizer with Steam Reboiler
Chance to optimize energy consumption within the unit and help optimize operation
Scope of Work
Analyze pre and post-bundle cleaning data on all exchangers that were cleaned in the Spring
Identify justifications for cleaning these bundles whether it be for economic or operational purposes
Results
Developed and identified justifications for what cleaning of each bundle gained for the refinery
Savings on fired heater duty
Drafted memo
Learning Opportunities
Received the chance to better understand how heat integration within a unit is designed
Greater understanding for benefits and of implementing a different heat exchanger design into service where a different design had previously been the norm
Received the opportunity to take on greater responsibilities during TAR and through developing FOEs
Working through the various responsibilities during TAR and the work that was completed with the Rate Test and FOE metrics I feel that I was able to discover how well I perform on my own. TAR especially taught me about how important being able to work effectively with others is when we are all working towards a common goal.
Lessons Learned
Learning to challenge my assumptions was one of the bigger personal lessons I will take away from this co-op term. There were times when I was working on the CFU rate test mass balance and FOE metrics where I found that my initial assumption was not always correct. It is always difficult admitting when you are wrong, but it has ultimately made me a better engineer because it has taught me to consider a problem from all angles prior to coming to a final conclusion.
Take Away
TAR greatly improved my understanding on unit and tower design as well as how units are integrated with one another to optimize their operations.
All the lessons, opportunities and struggles have improved not only as an engineer but also as an individual and co-worker. Ultimately the experiences I had here in Catlettsburg will continue to help me to improve and develop my abilities both in the classroom and in the workplace.