2. • The impact of disability cannot easily be separated
out for people in contact with the criminal justice
system
• Disability can result in criminalised behaviours
• How do we fund service provision based on the
identification of needs relating to an intellectual
disability only?
• How do we confidently state that one behavior is
more related to the presence of an intellectual
disability than another?
• How then can we ensure we are funding the true
extent of need?
Separation of disability and non-disability needs
2Monday, August 3, 2015
3. • Concept is problematic for those in
contact with the criminal justice system
• Many people have never had the privilege
of choice & control over their lives
• Impairments affecting cognition impacts o
understanding what a positive life might
look like
• Lack of insight into behaviours
Notions of choice and control
3Monday, August 3, 2015
4. • Disproportionate number of mental ill /
intellectual disability in criminal justice
contact
• Prison increases a range of risks and
compounds disability related cognition
• Prison increase likelihood of death, ill
health, homelessness and challenging
behaviours
• Needs within custody are inextricably
linked to a person’s disability
The impact of incarceration
4Monday, August 3, 2015
5. • Mainstream services are a challenge to
access and frequently denied
• ID is overshadowed by criminal history
• Services often miss or misunderstand ID
issues relating to criminalised behaviour.
• Self-determination is not likely to result in
access (e.g. lack of ID AoD services)
• Human rights for people with an ID and
criminalised behaviours are rarely
responded to fairly
Access to mainstream services
5Monday, August 3, 2015
6. • The proposed ‘Quality and Safeguarding’
sees risk as:
– risk of poor quality of service
– risk that a participant could be harmed
• Risk ignored as it relates to the risk to the
community
• Ability of this risk to prevent access to goals
• To ignore fact that criminal behavoiurs are co
sequence of disability is to shift care &
responsibility to criminal justice system.
Conceptualising of risk
6Monday, August 3, 2015
7. • Pre-release planning should occur while the
person is in prison.
• With the same worker supporting the person
on release from prison.
• Through-care leads to greater:
– levels of engagement,
– sustained engagement
– post-release success in increasing well being
• At this stage the maintenance of contact with
a person by a service provider is not
recognised as a critical element of support.
Importance of Through-care
7Monday, August 3, 2015
8. • Current funding results in recruitment of low
skilled and casual workforce
• Support requires range of skills given
complexity of histories, risks and needs
– Disability
– Mental health
– Drug and alcohol
– Offender rehabilitation
– Criminal justice system
• Need for flexibility in response to issues to
address fast paced change in needs
A skilled workforce
8Monday, August 3, 2015
9. All People With An Intellectual
Disability
Are Worth The Investment
9Monday, August 3, 2015
10. All People With An Intellectual
Disability
Are Worth The Investment
9Monday, August 3, 2015