6. 63% OF PEOPLE DID
NOT PREDICT OUR
CONCLUSION
37% OF PEOPLE
PREDICTED OUR
CONCLUSION
7. Q3 RATING OUR FILM ON A WHOLE
0% 0%
4%
4%
34%
Excellent
Great
Alright
29%
Just okay
Bad
Really Bad
Dreadful
29%
8. Q5 RATING THE EFFECTIVENESS
OF OUR SOUND
0%
4%
20%
Rubbish
42%
Pretty bad
Alright
Very good
Most excellent
34%
9. 37% OF PEOPLE THOUGHT
OUR MAIN CHARACTER
WAS DEVELOPED VERY
WELL
45% THOUGHT OUR USE
OF CAMERA ANGLES WAS
EXTREMELY EFFECTIVE
10. Q6 RATING THE EDITING
4%
16%
4%
Awful
30%
Not too bad
Good
Great
Perfect
46%
11. Q8 RATING THE MISÉ EN SCENE
0%
8%
Bad
30%
20%
Ok
Good
Very good but could have used
more work
Excellent
42%
12. TIPS FOR IMPROVEMENTSUGGESTED BY VIEWERS
• MAKE THE STORYLINE A BIT MORE
UNDERSTANDABLE
• MORE CAMERA ANGLES AND EFFECTS
• A LITTLE BIT MORE CONTEXT ON THE
FLASHBACKS
• THE SOUND COULD USE SOME MORE WORKWITH REGARDS TO HOW WE ARE PUT IN
TENSION
13. EVALUATION
From the feedback given, the majority loved the
unique location and use of sound. The editing and
execution of the film was well done but if we were
to reshoot it we would focus on how we present
the themes of our film. This could possibly be done
by changing some of shots- possibly including a
dolly shot. This is a shot that is very good at
showing a character’s change in perspective. We
would also focus on the storyline itself- as the final
character at the end- some viewers were very
confused about as there was barely any insight into
his character.
15. CRITICS ON SURVEY MONKEY RAVE
“VERY GOOD FOR A FIRST
SHORT”
“VERY GUID”
“CONTINUE
MORE WORK
GOOD”
“WELL DONE”
“IT WAS ALRIGHT”
“4”
“NICE JOB”
“TWAS
GREAT”
“IS NICE”
“INTERESTING
WITH AMBIGOUS
“NICE
ENDING”
ATMOSPHERE”
