SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 26
1©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
[Protected] Distribution or modification is subject
©2017 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Q1 2020
Check point Security Effectiveness-
THE FACTS
©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
2
©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
2
“IN GOD WE TRUST
ALL OTHERS
MUST BRING DATA“
W. Edwards Deming
©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
3
IPS Recommended – Jan 2011
Best integrated IPS Security Score of
97.3%!
NGFW Recommended – April 2011
World’s first NSS Recommended
NGFW!
FW Recommended – April 2011
Only vendor to pass the initial test!
NGFW Recommended – Jan 2012
Continued NGFW Leadership and
Excellence!
IPS Recommended – July 2012
Leading integrated IPS Security Score
of 98.7%!
FW Recommended – Jan 2013
Best Security + MGMT score of 100%!
IPS Recommended – Nov 2013
100% Management score and
Best annual Management Labor Cost
NGFW Recommended – Feb 2013
Best Security + MGMT Score of 98.5%!
NGFW Recommended – Sept 2014
4th NGFW Recommended
BDS Recommended – Aug 2015
1st time tested - 100% unknown
malware catch-rate
NSS Labs- Check Point’s track record of
security leadership and excellence!
NGFW Recommended (follow-on test) –
Aug 2018
Follow-on test - 99.62 overall Exploit Block-Rate
AEP Recommended – March 2019
96.6 overall Block-Rate
NGFW Recommended – Jul 2019
98.42 Exploit Catch-Rate
BPS Recommended – Aug 2019
98.4 Security Effectiveness
NGFW Recommended – Mar 2016
99.8% Catch rate and 5th NSS NGFW
Recommended!
BDS Recommended – Aug 2016
2nd NSS BDS Recommended! -
100% evasion free
NGIPS Recommended – Oct 2016
Highest Catch-rate 99.95% lowest TCO
NGFW Recommended – Jun 2017
99.56% overall Exploit Block-Rate
BDS Recommended – Oct 2017
99.7% overall Breach Detection Score
BPS Recommended – Dec 2017
Top Right Dot - 100% Block-rate
Score
AEP “AA” rating – Mar 2020
99.12 Block-Rate and #1 vendor in the
test
4©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
1
3
18
12
CHECK POINT PROVEN TRACK RECORD OF SECURITY EXCELLENCE
*
Recommended:
18/19=95%
Recommended:
63%
[Protected] Distribution or modification is subject to approval
Neutral Caution Recommended
Source: http://tiny.cc/nss_stats
NSS Labs Security tests (FW/NGFW/IPS/NGIPS/BDS/BPS/AEP)
2020 AEP A & AA rating considered as Recommended
Based on NSS Labs tests where Check Point and Palo Alto Participated together
4
5©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
1 2
21 19
CHECK POINT PROVEN TRACK RECORD OF SECURITY EXCELLENCE
Recommended:
21/22=95% Recommended:
86%
[Protected] Distribution or modification is subject to approval
Neutral Caution Recommended
Source: http://tiny.cc/nss_stats
NSS Labs Security tests (FW/NGFW/IPS/NGIPS/BDS/BPS/AEP)
2020 AEP A & AA rating considered as Recommended
Based on NSS Labs test where Check Point and Fortinet Participated together
1
6©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
1
6
16
9
CHECK POINT PROVEN TRACK RECORD OF SECURITY EXCELLENCE
*
Recommended:
16/17=94%
Recommended:
53%
[Protected] Distribution or modification is subject to approval
Neutral Caution Recommended
Source: http://tiny.cc/nss_stats
NSS Labs Security tests (FW/NGFW/IPS/NGIPS/BDS/BPS/AEP)
AEP 2020 no report for cisco yet
Based on NSS Labs tests where Check Point and Cisco Participated together
2
7©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
13
1
3 2
4
12
9 8
CHECK POINT PROVEN TRACK RECORD OF SECURITY EXCELLENCE
*
Recommended:
13/14=93%
Recommended:
57%
Recommended:
64%
Recommended:
86%
[Protected] Distribution or modification is subject to approval
Neutral Caution Recommended
Source: http://tiny.cc/nss_stats
NSS Labs Security tests (FW/NGFW/IPS/NGIPS/BDS/BPS/AEP)
Based on NSS Labs tests where all four vendors participated together
1
1
2
8©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
14
1
3 2
4
13
9 9
CHECK POINT PROVEN TRACK RECORD OF SECURITY EXCELLENCE
*
Recommended:
14/15=93%
Recommended:
60%
Recommended:
64%
Recommended:
86%
[Protected] Distribution or modification is subject to approval
Neutral Caution Recommended
Source: http://tiny.cc/nss_stats
NSS Labs Security tests (FW/NGFW/IPS/NGIPS/BDS/BPS/AEP)
2020 AEP A & AA rating considered as Recommended
Based on NSS Labs tests where all four vendors participated together
1
1
2
©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
9
Check Point SandBlast
Recommended for Security Effectiveness and Value
2019 NSS Breach Prevention Systems Test
©2016 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
100% Block Rate
100% Protection against
HTTP Malware
100% Protection against
Email Malware
98.4% Overall Security
Effectiveness
0.0% False Positives
A Leading TCO: $19
Price/protected Mbps
100% Exploit Resistant
100% catch-rate in post
infection
10©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
NSS Security Value Map
Breach Prevention System (BPS) Test – 2019
Check Point comes out on top !
TCO per Protected Mbps
SecurityEffectiveness
1 BPS
2 NGFW+AEP
3 NGIPS+AEP
©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
11
©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
11
4512 4343
4152
3416
4284
1447
1177 1104 1177 1268
1554 1518
1801
1579
1112
# CVE's
Microsoft CVE's
Adobe CVE's
Number of CVE’s covered by IPS (2014-2019)
Last 5 Years
Information is current as of Dec 2014 – Dec 22, 2019 | Source: Check Point Advisories| Palo Alto ThreatVault |Fortinet FortiGuard|Mcafee Threat Intelligence|Tipping Point Digital Vaccine|SourceFire
Advisories
©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
12
©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
12
4512 4343
1447
1177
1554 1518
# CVE's
Microsoft CVE's
Adobe CVE's
Number of CVE’s covered by IPS(2015-2019):
Check Point vs. Palo Alto Networks
Last 5 Years
Information is current as of Dec 2014 – Dec 2019 | Source: Palo Alto ThreatVault https://threatvault.paloaltonetworks.com/
©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
13
©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
13
4512 4472
4222
1447 1541
# CVE's Strict Optimized Microsoft CVE's Adobe CVE's
Number of CVE’s covered by IPS(Dec 2014-Dec 2019):
Check Point Strict & Optimized vs. Palo Alto Networks “ALL Signatures”
-Last 5 Years-
Information is current as of Dec 2014 – Dec 2019 | Source: Palo Alto ThreatVault https://threatvault.paloaltonetworks.com/
4343
1176
1518
©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
14
©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
14
4512
4152
1447
1104
1541 1425
# CVE's
Microsoft CVE's
Adobe CVE's
Number of CVE’s covered by IPS(2015-2019)
Check Point vs. Fortinet
Information is current as of Dec 13 2014 – Dec 13, 2019 | Source: FortiGuard Center https://fortiguard.com/updates/ips
©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
15
©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
15
4512
4284
1447 1268
1541
1112
# CVE's
Microsoft CVE's
Adobe CVE's
Number of CVE’s covered by IPS(2015-2019)
Check Point vs. Cisco SourceFire
Information is current as of Dec 13, 2014 – Dec 13, 2019 | Source: Cisco SourceFire Advisories http://www.snort.org/vrt/advisories/
©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
16
©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
16
4512
3375
1447 13931541
1160
# CVE's
Microsoft CVE's
Adobe CVE's
Number of CVE’s covered by IPS 2015-2019
Check Point vs. McAfee
Information is current as of Dec 13 – Dec 13, 2019 | Source: McAfee Threat Intelligence http://www.mcafee.com/threat-intelligence/vulnerability/latest.aspx
©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
18
©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
18
4512 4343 4152 4284
8012
3158
4200
3507
772
32 51
Check Point NGFW One Step Ahead – Visibility into risks
Information of IPS is current as of Dec 13, 2014 – Dec 13, 2019 | Source: Check Point Advisories| Palo Alto ThreatVault |Fortinet FortiGuard|Mcafee Threat Intelligence|Tipping Point Digital
Vaccine|SourceFire Advisories
IPS - Total number of CVE’s covered
Applications -Total number of Apps
DLP – number of Data types (patterns, file types )
©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
19
Check Point One Step Ahead in Detection
and Prevention of Threat Focused Apps
[Internal Use] for Check Point employees​
Potentially Risky Apps
Check
Point
Palo Alto
Networks
Fortinet Cisco
# of Anonymizers proxy/tunnel apps
(e.g. TOR, UltraSurf, HideMyAss…) 222 115 169 41
# of P2P apps
(e.g. Bitorrent, WinMX…) 343 146 64 54
# of File sharing apps
(e.g. Dropbox, Google Drive, Mega…) 945 348 178 155
# of Remote Admin apps
(e.g. TeamViewer, LogMeIn…) 147 98 84 71
Total number of apps
8,067 3,197 4,090 3,528
Source: Check Point AppWiki, PAN Applipedia, Fortinet FortiGuard, Cisco FirePower , as of March 10, 2020
[Protected ] Non-confidential content
©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
20
Vendors Check Point R80.x
Palo Alto Networks
V9.x
Fortinet
v6
Cisco
V6.2.1
IPS (CVEs covered) –
Dec 2014-Dec 2019
4,512 4,343 4,152 4,284
Application Control 8,067 3,197 4,090 3,528
DLP
File Types
over 500 10 51 -
Patterns
739 22 2 -
URL Filtering
Categories
164 71 88 84
[Protected ] Non-confidential content
Source: Check Point AppWiki, ThreatWiki, PAN Applipedia, Threat Vault, PA-VM, Fortinet FortiGuard, FG-VM, Cisco FirePower , as of March 2020
Check Point One Step Ahead in Detection
and Prevention of Threat Focused Apps
21©2020 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. Source: vendors security advisories web pages & http://tiny.cc/urgency
TO MAKE SURE YOUR SYSTEMS ARE NOT EXPOSED…
172
94.5118
234
128
159
136.6
Total of SW Vulnerabilities(2016-
2019)Average fix time (days)
Mature SW Code
Swift response to
SW vulnerabilities
©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
22
©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
22
Source: vendors security advisories web pages & http://tiny.cc/urgency
109min
TOP VULNERABILITIES
AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME
108days 2days
64min 10days 54days
20min 2days 1day 3days
5days
6days
5days
BlueKeep
CVE-2019-0708
©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
23
©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
23
9 hours
Check Point
Cisco
2 days
Fortinet
5 days
Heartbleed Shellshock Poodle-TLS Venom
22 hours
Check Point
18 hours
Check Point
30 hours
Check Point
Palo Alto
29 days
Fortinet
14 days
Palo Alto
56 days
Fortinet
10 days
Palo Alto
10 days
Fortinet
9 days
Sense of Urgency is in Our DNA
Full references at http://tiny.cc/dna-cp
©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
24
©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
24
Patch Tuesday 2015-2017
AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME FOR TOP VULNERABILITIES(IPS)
Apache Struts 2
35 minutes
Check Point
Palo Alto
377 min.
Cisco
110 min.
29 hours
Check Point
13 hours
Check Point
Palo Alto
6 days
Fortinet
4 days
Palo Alto
22 hours
Fortinet
44 hours
Flash (0day)
CVE-2017-11292
48 hours
Check Point
Palo Alto
12 days
Fortinet
5 days
Disdain EK
CVE-2017-0037
CVE-2017-0059
CVE-2017-9805
CVE-2017-9791
Source: vendors security advisories web pages & http://tiny.cc/urgency
©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
25
©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
25
Patch Tuesday 2015,2016
AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME FOR TOP VULNERABILITIES(IPS)
SSL Drown Attack
50 minutes
Check Point
Palo Alto
900 min.
Cisco
98 min.
0 hours
Check Point
13 hours
Check Point
Palo Alto
10 days
Fortinet
9 hours
Palo Alto
5 days
Fortinet
5 days
Flash (In The Wild)
0days 2016
Full references at http://tiny.cc/dna-cp
11 Minutes
Check Point
Palo Alto
9 hours
Fortinet
1 hour
BADLOCK
26©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Patch Tuesday 2017
AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME FOR TOP VULNERABILITIES(IPS)
Apache Struts 2
40 minutes
Check Point
Palo Alto
8.3 Hours
Cisco
110 min.
29 hours
Check Point
43 minutes
Check Point
Palo Alto
6 days
Fortinet
4 days
Palo Alto
35 Days
Fortinet
30 Days
48 hours
Check Point
Palo Alto
12 days
Fortinet
5 days
Disdain EK
CVE-2017-0037
CVE-2017-0059
CVE-2017-9805
CVE-2017-9791
Source: vendors security advisories web pages & http://tiny.cc/urgency
WannaCry & NotPetya
Key Competitive Point: Such response time is unacceptable
27©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Patch Tuesday 2017
AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME FOR TOP VULNERABILITIES(IPS)
40 minutes
Check Point
Palo Alto
8.3 Hours
Fortinet
3.6 hours.
12.3 hours
Check Point
43 minutes
Check Point
Palo Alto
36.3 hours
Fortinet
32 hours
Palo Alto
30 Days
Fortinet
30 Days
CVE-2017-5753, CVE-2017-5715, CVE-2017-5754
WannaCry & NotPetya
CVE-2017-0144
Apache Struts 2
29 hours
Check Point
Palo Alto
6 days
Fortinet
4 days
CVE-2017-9805
CVE-2017-9791

More Related Content

What's hot

PaloAlto Enterprise Security Solution
PaloAlto Enterprise Security SolutionPaloAlto Enterprise Security Solution
PaloAlto Enterprise Security SolutionPrime Infoserv
 
SOC Architecture Workshop - Part 1
SOC Architecture Workshop - Part 1SOC Architecture Workshop - Part 1
SOC Architecture Workshop - Part 1Priyanka Aash
 
Security architecture
Security architectureSecurity architecture
Security architectureDuncan Unwin
 
SDWAN Concept - Certificate and keys Roles in Controllers and vEdge Router Au...
SDWAN Concept - Certificate and keys Roles in Controllers and vEdge Router Au...SDWAN Concept - Certificate and keys Roles in Controllers and vEdge Router Au...
SDWAN Concept - Certificate and keys Roles in Controllers and vEdge Router Au...Farooq Khan
 
What We’ve Learned Building a Cyber Security Operation Center: du Case Study
What We’ve Learned Building a Cyber  Security Operation Center: du Case  StudyWhat We’ve Learned Building a Cyber  Security Operation Center: du Case  Study
What We’ve Learned Building a Cyber Security Operation Center: du Case StudyPriyanka Aash
 
Bulding Soc In Changing Threat Landscapefinal
Bulding Soc In Changing Threat LandscapefinalBulding Soc In Changing Threat Landscapefinal
Bulding Soc In Changing Threat LandscapefinalMahmoud Yassin
 
From SIEM to SOC: Crossing the Cybersecurity Chasm
From SIEM to SOC: Crossing the Cybersecurity ChasmFrom SIEM to SOC: Crossing the Cybersecurity Chasm
From SIEM to SOC: Crossing the Cybersecurity ChasmPriyanka Aash
 
Presentation cisco iron port email & web security
Presentation   cisco iron port email & web securityPresentation   cisco iron port email & web security
Presentation cisco iron port email & web securityxKinAnx
 
Briefing the board lessons learned from cisos and directors
Briefing the board lessons learned from cisos and directorsBriefing the board lessons learned from cisos and directors
Briefing the board lessons learned from cisos and directorsPriyanka Aash
 
cloud security-suk kim-2022-10-14-Busan.pdf
cloud security-suk kim-2022-10-14-Busan.pdfcloud security-suk kim-2022-10-14-Busan.pdf
cloud security-suk kim-2022-10-14-Busan.pdfsuk kim
 
Check Point SandBlast and SandBlast Agent
Check Point SandBlast and SandBlast AgentCheck Point SandBlast and SandBlast Agent
Check Point SandBlast and SandBlast AgentMarketingArrowECS_CZ
 
IBM Security Strategy Overview
IBM Security Strategy OverviewIBM Security Strategy Overview
IBM Security Strategy Overviewxband
 
Workshop Trend Micro
Workshop Trend MicroWorkshop Trend Micro
Workshop Trend MicroAymen Mami
 
Optimizing Security Operations: 5 Keys to Success
Optimizing Security Operations: 5 Keys to SuccessOptimizing Security Operations: 5 Keys to Success
Optimizing Security Operations: 5 Keys to SuccessSirius
 
SOC: Use cases and are we asking the right questions?
SOC: Use cases and are we asking the right questions?SOC: Use cases and are we asking the right questions?
SOC: Use cases and are we asking the right questions?Jonathan Sinclair
 
Cisco Security portfolio update
Cisco Security portfolio updateCisco Security portfolio update
Cisco Security portfolio updateAtanas Gergiminov
 
Splunk Phantom SOAR Roundtable
Splunk Phantom SOAR RoundtableSplunk Phantom SOAR Roundtable
Splunk Phantom SOAR RoundtableSplunk
 
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)k33a
 
[AKIBA.AWS] NLBとPrivateLinkの仕様に立ち向かう
[AKIBA.AWS] NLBとPrivateLinkの仕様に立ち向かう[AKIBA.AWS] NLBとPrivateLinkの仕様に立ち向かう
[AKIBA.AWS] NLBとPrivateLinkの仕様に立ち向かうShuji Kikuchi
 

What's hot (20)

PaloAlto Enterprise Security Solution
PaloAlto Enterprise Security SolutionPaloAlto Enterprise Security Solution
PaloAlto Enterprise Security Solution
 
SOC Architecture Workshop - Part 1
SOC Architecture Workshop - Part 1SOC Architecture Workshop - Part 1
SOC Architecture Workshop - Part 1
 
Security architecture
Security architectureSecurity architecture
Security architecture
 
SDWAN Concept - Certificate and keys Roles in Controllers and vEdge Router Au...
SDWAN Concept - Certificate and keys Roles in Controllers and vEdge Router Au...SDWAN Concept - Certificate and keys Roles in Controllers and vEdge Router Au...
SDWAN Concept - Certificate and keys Roles in Controllers and vEdge Router Au...
 
What We’ve Learned Building a Cyber Security Operation Center: du Case Study
What We’ve Learned Building a Cyber  Security Operation Center: du Case  StudyWhat We’ve Learned Building a Cyber  Security Operation Center: du Case  Study
What We’ve Learned Building a Cyber Security Operation Center: du Case Study
 
Bulding Soc In Changing Threat Landscapefinal
Bulding Soc In Changing Threat LandscapefinalBulding Soc In Changing Threat Landscapefinal
Bulding Soc In Changing Threat Landscapefinal
 
From SIEM to SOC: Crossing the Cybersecurity Chasm
From SIEM to SOC: Crossing the Cybersecurity ChasmFrom SIEM to SOC: Crossing the Cybersecurity Chasm
From SIEM to SOC: Crossing the Cybersecurity Chasm
 
Presentation cisco iron port email & web security
Presentation   cisco iron port email & web securityPresentation   cisco iron port email & web security
Presentation cisco iron port email & web security
 
Briefing the board lessons learned from cisos and directors
Briefing the board lessons learned from cisos and directorsBriefing the board lessons learned from cisos and directors
Briefing the board lessons learned from cisos and directors
 
cloud security-suk kim-2022-10-14-Busan.pdf
cloud security-suk kim-2022-10-14-Busan.pdfcloud security-suk kim-2022-10-14-Busan.pdf
cloud security-suk kim-2022-10-14-Busan.pdf
 
Check Point SandBlast and SandBlast Agent
Check Point SandBlast and SandBlast AgentCheck Point SandBlast and SandBlast Agent
Check Point SandBlast and SandBlast Agent
 
IBM Security Strategy Overview
IBM Security Strategy OverviewIBM Security Strategy Overview
IBM Security Strategy Overview
 
Workshop Trend Micro
Workshop Trend MicroWorkshop Trend Micro
Workshop Trend Micro
 
Optimizing Security Operations: 5 Keys to Success
Optimizing Security Operations: 5 Keys to SuccessOptimizing Security Operations: 5 Keys to Success
Optimizing Security Operations: 5 Keys to Success
 
SOC: Use cases and are we asking the right questions?
SOC: Use cases and are we asking the right questions?SOC: Use cases and are we asking the right questions?
SOC: Use cases and are we asking the right questions?
 
Cisco Security portfolio update
Cisco Security portfolio updateCisco Security portfolio update
Cisco Security portfolio update
 
Introducing Splunk – The Big Data Engine
Introducing Splunk – The Big Data EngineIntroducing Splunk – The Big Data Engine
Introducing Splunk – The Big Data Engine
 
Splunk Phantom SOAR Roundtable
Splunk Phantom SOAR RoundtableSplunk Phantom SOAR Roundtable
Splunk Phantom SOAR Roundtable
 
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
 
[AKIBA.AWS] NLBとPrivateLinkの仕様に立ち向かう
[AKIBA.AWS] NLBとPrivateLinkの仕様に立ち向かう[AKIBA.AWS] NLBとPrivateLinkの仕様に立ち向かう
[AKIBA.AWS] NLBとPrivateLinkの仕様に立ち向かう
 

Similar to Check Point vs competition security effectiveness

Emphasizing Value of Prioritizing AppSec Meetup 11052023.pptx
Emphasizing Value of Prioritizing AppSec Meetup 11052023.pptxEmphasizing Value of Prioritizing AppSec Meetup 11052023.pptx
Emphasizing Value of Prioritizing AppSec Meetup 11052023.pptxlior mazor
 
Pactera - Cloud, Application, Cyber Security Trend 2016
Pactera - Cloud, Application, Cyber Security Trend 2016Pactera - Cloud, Application, Cyber Security Trend 2016
Pactera - Cloud, Application, Cyber Security Trend 2016Kyle Lai
 
Infosec 2014: Risk Analytics: Using Your Data to Solve Security Challenges
Infosec 2014: Risk Analytics: Using Your Data to Solve Security ChallengesInfosec 2014: Risk Analytics: Using Your Data to Solve Security Challenges
Infosec 2014: Risk Analytics: Using Your Data to Solve Security ChallengesSkybox Security
 
комплексная защита от современных интернет угроз с помощью Check point sandblast
комплексная защита от современных интернет угроз с помощью Check point sandblastкомплексная защита от современных интернет угроз с помощью Check point sandblast
комплексная защита от современных интернет угроз с помощью Check point sandblastDiana Frolova
 
Fact vs-hype top10
Fact vs-hype top10Fact vs-hype top10
Fact vs-hype top10Usman Arif
 
Overcoming the old ways of working with DevSecOps - Culture, Data, Graph, and...
Overcoming the old ways of working with DevSecOps - Culture, Data, Graph, and...Overcoming the old ways of working with DevSecOps - Culture, Data, Graph, and...
Overcoming the old ways of working with DevSecOps - Culture, Data, Graph, and...Erkang Zheng
 
Advanced threat security - Cyber Security For The Real World
Advanced threat security - Cyber Security For The Real WorldAdvanced threat security - Cyber Security For The Real World
Advanced threat security - Cyber Security For The Real WorldCisco Canada
 
Android App Security Solution
Android App Security SolutionAndroid App Security Solution
Android App Security SolutionJay Li
 
Check Point: From Branch to Data Center
Check Point: From Branch to Data CenterCheck Point: From Branch to Data Center
Check Point: From Branch to Data CenterGroup of company MUK
 
What's Wrong with Vulnerability Management & How Can We Fix It
What's Wrong with Vulnerability Management & How Can We Fix ItWhat's Wrong with Vulnerability Management & How Can We Fix It
What's Wrong with Vulnerability Management & How Can We Fix ItSkybox Security
 
DevOps Night - Shifting Security to the Left - SCTV Tower - 19 September 2018
DevOps Night - Shifting Security to the Left - SCTV Tower - 19 September 2018DevOps Night - Shifting Security to the Left - SCTV Tower - 19 September 2018
DevOps Night - Shifting Security to the Left - SCTV Tower - 19 September 2018Adhitya Hartowo
 
MalCon Future of Security
MalCon Future of SecurityMalCon Future of Security
MalCon Future of SecurityNetskope
 
Risk Analytics: One Intelligent View
Risk Analytics: One Intelligent ViewRisk Analytics: One Intelligent View
Risk Analytics: One Intelligent ViewSkybox Security
 
BGA SOME/SOC Etkinliği - Tehdit Odaklı Güvenlik Mimarisinde Sourcefire Yakla...
BGA SOME/SOC Etkinliği - Tehdit  Odaklı Güvenlik Mimarisinde Sourcefire Yakla...BGA SOME/SOC Etkinliği - Tehdit  Odaklı Güvenlik Mimarisinde Sourcefire Yakla...
BGA SOME/SOC Etkinliği - Tehdit Odaklı Güvenlik Mimarisinde Sourcefire Yakla...BGA Cyber Security
 
Juniper competitive cheatsheet
Juniper competitive cheatsheetJuniper competitive cheatsheet
Juniper competitive cheatsheetUsman Arif
 
Cisco Live Cancun PR Session
Cisco Live Cancun PR SessionCisco Live Cancun PR Session
Cisco Live Cancun PR SessionFelipe Lamus
 
Solnet dev secops meetup
Solnet dev secops meetupSolnet dev secops meetup
Solnet dev secops meetuppbink
 

Similar to Check Point vs competition security effectiveness (20)

Emphasizing Value of Prioritizing AppSec Meetup 11052023.pptx
Emphasizing Value of Prioritizing AppSec Meetup 11052023.pptxEmphasizing Value of Prioritizing AppSec Meetup 11052023.pptx
Emphasizing Value of Prioritizing AppSec Meetup 11052023.pptx
 
CPX 2016 Moti Sagey Security Vendor Landscape
CPX 2016 Moti Sagey Security Vendor LandscapeCPX 2016 Moti Sagey Security Vendor Landscape
CPX 2016 Moti Sagey Security Vendor Landscape
 
Pactera - Cloud, Application, Cyber Security Trend 2016
Pactera - Cloud, Application, Cyber Security Trend 2016Pactera - Cloud, Application, Cyber Security Trend 2016
Pactera - Cloud, Application, Cyber Security Trend 2016
 
Infosec 2014: Risk Analytics: Using Your Data to Solve Security Challenges
Infosec 2014: Risk Analytics: Using Your Data to Solve Security ChallengesInfosec 2014: Risk Analytics: Using Your Data to Solve Security Challenges
Infosec 2014: Risk Analytics: Using Your Data to Solve Security Challenges
 
комплексная защита от современных интернет угроз с помощью Check point sandblast
комплексная защита от современных интернет угроз с помощью Check point sandblastкомплексная защита от современных интернет угроз с помощью Check point sandblast
комплексная защита от современных интернет угроз с помощью Check point sandblast
 
Fact vs-hype top10
Fact vs-hype top10Fact vs-hype top10
Fact vs-hype top10
 
Overcoming the old ways of working with DevSecOps - Culture, Data, Graph, and...
Overcoming the old ways of working with DevSecOps - Culture, Data, Graph, and...Overcoming the old ways of working with DevSecOps - Culture, Data, Graph, and...
Overcoming the old ways of working with DevSecOps - Culture, Data, Graph, and...
 
Check Point Corporate Overview 2020 - Detailed
Check Point Corporate Overview 2020 - DetailedCheck Point Corporate Overview 2020 - Detailed
Check Point Corporate Overview 2020 - Detailed
 
Advanced threat security - Cyber Security For The Real World
Advanced threat security - Cyber Security For The Real WorldAdvanced threat security - Cyber Security For The Real World
Advanced threat security - Cyber Security For The Real World
 
Android App Security Solution
Android App Security SolutionAndroid App Security Solution
Android App Security Solution
 
Check Point: From Branch to Data Center
Check Point: From Branch to Data CenterCheck Point: From Branch to Data Center
Check Point: From Branch to Data Center
 
FireEye Solutions
FireEye SolutionsFireEye Solutions
FireEye Solutions
 
What's Wrong with Vulnerability Management & How Can We Fix It
What's Wrong with Vulnerability Management & How Can We Fix ItWhat's Wrong with Vulnerability Management & How Can We Fix It
What's Wrong with Vulnerability Management & How Can We Fix It
 
DevOps Night - Shifting Security to the Left - SCTV Tower - 19 September 2018
DevOps Night - Shifting Security to the Left - SCTV Tower - 19 September 2018DevOps Night - Shifting Security to the Left - SCTV Tower - 19 September 2018
DevOps Night - Shifting Security to the Left - SCTV Tower - 19 September 2018
 
MalCon Future of Security
MalCon Future of SecurityMalCon Future of Security
MalCon Future of Security
 
Risk Analytics: One Intelligent View
Risk Analytics: One Intelligent ViewRisk Analytics: One Intelligent View
Risk Analytics: One Intelligent View
 
BGA SOME/SOC Etkinliği - Tehdit Odaklı Güvenlik Mimarisinde Sourcefire Yakla...
BGA SOME/SOC Etkinliği - Tehdit  Odaklı Güvenlik Mimarisinde Sourcefire Yakla...BGA SOME/SOC Etkinliği - Tehdit  Odaklı Güvenlik Mimarisinde Sourcefire Yakla...
BGA SOME/SOC Etkinliği - Tehdit Odaklı Güvenlik Mimarisinde Sourcefire Yakla...
 
Juniper competitive cheatsheet
Juniper competitive cheatsheetJuniper competitive cheatsheet
Juniper competitive cheatsheet
 
Cisco Live Cancun PR Session
Cisco Live Cancun PR SessionCisco Live Cancun PR Session
Cisco Live Cancun PR Session
 
Solnet dev secops meetup
Solnet dev secops meetupSolnet dev secops meetup
Solnet dev secops meetup
 

More from Moti Sagey מוטי שגיא

CPX23_Moti_2nd_best_sec_will_get_u_breached_v11.pdf
CPX23_Moti_2nd_best_sec_will_get_u_breached_v11.pdfCPX23_Moti_2nd_best_sec_will_get_u_breached_v11.pdf
CPX23_Moti_2nd_best_sec_will_get_u_breached_v11.pdfMoti Sagey מוטי שגיא
 
Moti Sagey CPX keynote _Are All security products created equal
Moti Sagey CPX keynote _Are All security products created equal Moti Sagey CPX keynote _Are All security products created equal
Moti Sagey CPX keynote _Are All security products created equal Moti Sagey מוטי שגיא
 

More from Moti Sagey מוטי שגיא (17)

CPX23_Moti_2nd_best_sec_will_get_u_breached_v11.pdf
CPX23_Moti_2nd_best_sec_will_get_u_breached_v11.pdfCPX23_Moti_2nd_best_sec_will_get_u_breached_v11.pdf
CPX23_Moti_2nd_best_sec_will_get_u_breached_v11.pdf
 
Why Check Point - Top 4 Facts
Why Check Point  - Top 4 FactsWhy Check Point  - Top 4 Facts
Why Check Point - Top 4 Facts
 
Mind the gap_cpx2022_moti_sagey_final
Mind the gap_cpx2022_moti_sagey_finalMind the gap_cpx2022_moti_sagey_final
Mind the gap_cpx2022_moti_sagey_final
 
Why check point win top 4 facts
Why check point win   top 4 factsWhy check point win   top 4 facts
Why check point win top 4 facts
 
Why Check Point - Moti Sagey
Why Check Point - Moti SageyWhy Check Point - Moti Sagey
Why Check Point - Moti Sagey
 
NGFW RFP TEMPLATE - TEST PLAN
NGFW RFP TEMPLATE - TEST PLANNGFW RFP TEMPLATE - TEST PLAN
NGFW RFP TEMPLATE - TEST PLAN
 
Check point Infinity Overview
Check point Infinity OverviewCheck point Infinity Overview
Check point Infinity Overview
 
Why Check Point - Top 4
Why Check Point - Top 4Why Check Point - Top 4
Why Check Point - Top 4
 
Security architecture proposal template
Security architecture proposal templateSecurity architecture proposal template
Security architecture proposal template
 
Cyber Security Coverage heat map
Cyber Security Coverage heat map Cyber Security Coverage heat map
Cyber Security Coverage heat map
 
Moti Sagey CPX keynote _Are All security products created equal
Moti Sagey CPX keynote _Are All security products created equal Moti Sagey CPX keynote _Are All security products created equal
Moti Sagey CPX keynote _Are All security products created equal
 
Ecosystem
EcosystemEcosystem
Ecosystem
 
Cyber intro 2017_hebrew
Cyber intro 2017_hebrew Cyber intro 2017_hebrew
Cyber intro 2017_hebrew
 
Check point response to Cisco NGFW competitive
Check point response to Cisco NGFW competitiveCheck point response to Cisco NGFW competitive
Check point response to Cisco NGFW competitive
 
Check Point mission statement
Check Point mission statementCheck Point mission statement
Check Point mission statement
 
How to Choose a SandBox - Gartner
How to Choose a SandBox - GartnerHow to Choose a SandBox - Gartner
How to Choose a SandBox - Gartner
 
How to expose shortcuts in competitive poc
How to expose shortcuts in competitive pocHow to expose shortcuts in competitive poc
How to expose shortcuts in competitive poc
 

Recently uploaded

Call girls Service Canacona - 8250092165 Our call girls are sure to provide y...
Call girls Service Canacona - 8250092165 Our call girls are sure to provide y...Call girls Service Canacona - 8250092165 Our call girls are sure to provide y...
Call girls Service Canacona - 8250092165 Our call girls are sure to provide y...MOHANI PANDEY
 
Call girls Service in Ajman 0505086370 Ajman call girls
Call girls Service in Ajman 0505086370 Ajman call girlsCall girls Service in Ajman 0505086370 Ajman call girls
Call girls Service in Ajman 0505086370 Ajman call girlsMonica Sydney
 
一比一原版贝德福特大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版贝德福特大学毕业证学位证书一比一原版贝德福特大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版贝德福特大学毕业证学位证书F
 
APNIC Policy Roundup, presented by Sunny Chendi at the 5th ICANN APAC-TWNIC E...
APNIC Policy Roundup, presented by Sunny Chendi at the 5th ICANN APAC-TWNIC E...APNIC Policy Roundup, presented by Sunny Chendi at the 5th ICANN APAC-TWNIC E...
APNIC Policy Roundup, presented by Sunny Chendi at the 5th ICANN APAC-TWNIC E...APNIC
 
Top profile Call Girls In Dindigul [ 7014168258 ] Call Me For Genuine Models ...
Top profile Call Girls In Dindigul [ 7014168258 ] Call Me For Genuine Models ...Top profile Call Girls In Dindigul [ 7014168258 ] Call Me For Genuine Models ...
Top profile Call Girls In Dindigul [ 7014168258 ] Call Me For Genuine Models ...gajnagarg
 
Research Assignment - NIST SP800 [172 A] - Presentation.pptx
Research Assignment - NIST SP800 [172 A] - Presentation.pptxResearch Assignment - NIST SP800 [172 A] - Presentation.pptx
Research Assignment - NIST SP800 [172 A] - Presentation.pptxi191686
 
💚 Call Girls Bahraich 9332606886 High Profile Call Girls You Can Get The S...
💚 Call Girls Bahraich   9332606886  High Profile Call Girls You Can Get The S...💚 Call Girls Bahraich   9332606886  High Profile Call Girls You Can Get The S...
💚 Call Girls Bahraich 9332606886 High Profile Call Girls You Can Get The S...Sareena Khatun
 
Local Call Girls in Gomati 9332606886 HOT & SEXY Models beautiful and charmi...
Local Call Girls in Gomati  9332606886 HOT & SEXY Models beautiful and charmi...Local Call Girls in Gomati  9332606886 HOT & SEXY Models beautiful and charmi...
Local Call Girls in Gomati 9332606886 HOT & SEXY Models beautiful and charmi...Sareena Khatun
 
2nd Solid Symposium: Solid Pods vs Personal Knowledge Graphs
2nd Solid Symposium: Solid Pods vs Personal Knowledge Graphs2nd Solid Symposium: Solid Pods vs Personal Knowledge Graphs
2nd Solid Symposium: Solid Pods vs Personal Knowledge GraphsEleniIlkou
 
Best SEO Services Company in Dallas | Best SEO Agency Dallas
Best SEO Services Company in Dallas | Best SEO Agency DallasBest SEO Services Company in Dallas | Best SEO Agency Dallas
Best SEO Services Company in Dallas | Best SEO Agency DallasDigicorns Technologies
 
Vip Firozabad Phone 8250092165 Escorts Service At 6k To 30k Along With Ac Room
Vip Firozabad Phone 8250092165 Escorts Service At 6k To 30k Along With Ac RoomVip Firozabad Phone 8250092165 Escorts Service At 6k To 30k Along With Ac Room
Vip Firozabad Phone 8250092165 Escorts Service At 6k To 30k Along With Ac Roommeghakumariji156
 
Local Call Girls in Seoni 9332606886 HOT & SEXY Models beautiful and charmin...
Local Call Girls in Seoni  9332606886 HOT & SEXY Models beautiful and charmin...Local Call Girls in Seoni  9332606886 HOT & SEXY Models beautiful and charmin...
Local Call Girls in Seoni 9332606886 HOT & SEXY Models beautiful and charmin...kumargunjan9515
 
best call girls in Hyderabad Finest Escorts Service 📞 9352988975 📞 Available ...
best call girls in Hyderabad Finest Escorts Service 📞 9352988975 📞 Available ...best call girls in Hyderabad Finest Escorts Service 📞 9352988975 📞 Available ...
best call girls in Hyderabad Finest Escorts Service 📞 9352988975 📞 Available ...kajalverma014
 
Trump Diapers Over Dems t shirts Sweatshirt
Trump Diapers Over Dems t shirts SweatshirtTrump Diapers Over Dems t shirts Sweatshirt
Trump Diapers Over Dems t shirts Sweatshirtrahman018755
 
一比一原版犹他大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版犹他大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版犹他大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版犹他大学毕业证如何办理F
 
20240509 QFM015 Engineering Leadership Reading List April 2024.pdf
20240509 QFM015 Engineering Leadership Reading List April 2024.pdf20240509 QFM015 Engineering Leadership Reading List April 2024.pdf
20240509 QFM015 Engineering Leadership Reading List April 2024.pdfMatthew Sinclair
 
Nagercoil Escorts Service Girl ^ 9332606886, WhatsApp Anytime Nagercoil
Nagercoil Escorts Service Girl ^ 9332606886, WhatsApp Anytime NagercoilNagercoil Escorts Service Girl ^ 9332606886, WhatsApp Anytime Nagercoil
Nagercoil Escorts Service Girl ^ 9332606886, WhatsApp Anytime Nagercoilmeghakumariji156
 
一比一原版帝国理工学院毕业证如何办理
一比一原版帝国理工学院毕业证如何办理一比一原版帝国理工学院毕业证如何办理
一比一原版帝国理工学院毕业证如何办理F
 
South Bopal [ (Call Girls) in Ahmedabad ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Paymen...
South Bopal [ (Call Girls) in Ahmedabad ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Paymen...South Bopal [ (Call Girls) in Ahmedabad ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Paymen...
South Bopal [ (Call Girls) in Ahmedabad ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Paymen...gragchanchal546
 
pdfcoffee.com_business-ethics-q3m7-pdf-free.pdf
pdfcoffee.com_business-ethics-q3m7-pdf-free.pdfpdfcoffee.com_business-ethics-q3m7-pdf-free.pdf
pdfcoffee.com_business-ethics-q3m7-pdf-free.pdfJOHNBEBONYAP1
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Call girls Service Canacona - 8250092165 Our call girls are sure to provide y...
Call girls Service Canacona - 8250092165 Our call girls are sure to provide y...Call girls Service Canacona - 8250092165 Our call girls are sure to provide y...
Call girls Service Canacona - 8250092165 Our call girls are sure to provide y...
 
Call girls Service in Ajman 0505086370 Ajman call girls
Call girls Service in Ajman 0505086370 Ajman call girlsCall girls Service in Ajman 0505086370 Ajman call girls
Call girls Service in Ajman 0505086370 Ajman call girls
 
一比一原版贝德福特大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版贝德福特大学毕业证学位证书一比一原版贝德福特大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版贝德福特大学毕业证学位证书
 
APNIC Policy Roundup, presented by Sunny Chendi at the 5th ICANN APAC-TWNIC E...
APNIC Policy Roundup, presented by Sunny Chendi at the 5th ICANN APAC-TWNIC E...APNIC Policy Roundup, presented by Sunny Chendi at the 5th ICANN APAC-TWNIC E...
APNIC Policy Roundup, presented by Sunny Chendi at the 5th ICANN APAC-TWNIC E...
 
Top profile Call Girls In Dindigul [ 7014168258 ] Call Me For Genuine Models ...
Top profile Call Girls In Dindigul [ 7014168258 ] Call Me For Genuine Models ...Top profile Call Girls In Dindigul [ 7014168258 ] Call Me For Genuine Models ...
Top profile Call Girls In Dindigul [ 7014168258 ] Call Me For Genuine Models ...
 
Research Assignment - NIST SP800 [172 A] - Presentation.pptx
Research Assignment - NIST SP800 [172 A] - Presentation.pptxResearch Assignment - NIST SP800 [172 A] - Presentation.pptx
Research Assignment - NIST SP800 [172 A] - Presentation.pptx
 
💚 Call Girls Bahraich 9332606886 High Profile Call Girls You Can Get The S...
💚 Call Girls Bahraich   9332606886  High Profile Call Girls You Can Get The S...💚 Call Girls Bahraich   9332606886  High Profile Call Girls You Can Get The S...
💚 Call Girls Bahraich 9332606886 High Profile Call Girls You Can Get The S...
 
Local Call Girls in Gomati 9332606886 HOT & SEXY Models beautiful and charmi...
Local Call Girls in Gomati  9332606886 HOT & SEXY Models beautiful and charmi...Local Call Girls in Gomati  9332606886 HOT & SEXY Models beautiful and charmi...
Local Call Girls in Gomati 9332606886 HOT & SEXY Models beautiful and charmi...
 
2nd Solid Symposium: Solid Pods vs Personal Knowledge Graphs
2nd Solid Symposium: Solid Pods vs Personal Knowledge Graphs2nd Solid Symposium: Solid Pods vs Personal Knowledge Graphs
2nd Solid Symposium: Solid Pods vs Personal Knowledge Graphs
 
Best SEO Services Company in Dallas | Best SEO Agency Dallas
Best SEO Services Company in Dallas | Best SEO Agency DallasBest SEO Services Company in Dallas | Best SEO Agency Dallas
Best SEO Services Company in Dallas | Best SEO Agency Dallas
 
Vip Firozabad Phone 8250092165 Escorts Service At 6k To 30k Along With Ac Room
Vip Firozabad Phone 8250092165 Escorts Service At 6k To 30k Along With Ac RoomVip Firozabad Phone 8250092165 Escorts Service At 6k To 30k Along With Ac Room
Vip Firozabad Phone 8250092165 Escorts Service At 6k To 30k Along With Ac Room
 
Local Call Girls in Seoni 9332606886 HOT & SEXY Models beautiful and charmin...
Local Call Girls in Seoni  9332606886 HOT & SEXY Models beautiful and charmin...Local Call Girls in Seoni  9332606886 HOT & SEXY Models beautiful and charmin...
Local Call Girls in Seoni 9332606886 HOT & SEXY Models beautiful and charmin...
 
best call girls in Hyderabad Finest Escorts Service 📞 9352988975 📞 Available ...
best call girls in Hyderabad Finest Escorts Service 📞 9352988975 📞 Available ...best call girls in Hyderabad Finest Escorts Service 📞 9352988975 📞 Available ...
best call girls in Hyderabad Finest Escorts Service 📞 9352988975 📞 Available ...
 
Trump Diapers Over Dems t shirts Sweatshirt
Trump Diapers Over Dems t shirts SweatshirtTrump Diapers Over Dems t shirts Sweatshirt
Trump Diapers Over Dems t shirts Sweatshirt
 
一比一原版犹他大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版犹他大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版犹他大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版犹他大学毕业证如何办理
 
20240509 QFM015 Engineering Leadership Reading List April 2024.pdf
20240509 QFM015 Engineering Leadership Reading List April 2024.pdf20240509 QFM015 Engineering Leadership Reading List April 2024.pdf
20240509 QFM015 Engineering Leadership Reading List April 2024.pdf
 
Nagercoil Escorts Service Girl ^ 9332606886, WhatsApp Anytime Nagercoil
Nagercoil Escorts Service Girl ^ 9332606886, WhatsApp Anytime NagercoilNagercoil Escorts Service Girl ^ 9332606886, WhatsApp Anytime Nagercoil
Nagercoil Escorts Service Girl ^ 9332606886, WhatsApp Anytime Nagercoil
 
一比一原版帝国理工学院毕业证如何办理
一比一原版帝国理工学院毕业证如何办理一比一原版帝国理工学院毕业证如何办理
一比一原版帝国理工学院毕业证如何办理
 
South Bopal [ (Call Girls) in Ahmedabad ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Paymen...
South Bopal [ (Call Girls) in Ahmedabad ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Paymen...South Bopal [ (Call Girls) in Ahmedabad ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Paymen...
South Bopal [ (Call Girls) in Ahmedabad ₹7.5k Pick Up & Drop With Cash Paymen...
 
pdfcoffee.com_business-ethics-q3m7-pdf-free.pdf
pdfcoffee.com_business-ethics-q3m7-pdf-free.pdfpdfcoffee.com_business-ethics-q3m7-pdf-free.pdf
pdfcoffee.com_business-ethics-q3m7-pdf-free.pdf
 

Check Point vs competition security effectiveness

  • 1. 1©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. [Protected] Distribution or modification is subject ©2017 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. Q1 2020 Check point Security Effectiveness- THE FACTS
  • 2. ©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 2 ©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 2 “IN GOD WE TRUST ALL OTHERS MUST BRING DATA“ W. Edwards Deming
  • 3. ©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 3 IPS Recommended – Jan 2011 Best integrated IPS Security Score of 97.3%! NGFW Recommended – April 2011 World’s first NSS Recommended NGFW! FW Recommended – April 2011 Only vendor to pass the initial test! NGFW Recommended – Jan 2012 Continued NGFW Leadership and Excellence! IPS Recommended – July 2012 Leading integrated IPS Security Score of 98.7%! FW Recommended – Jan 2013 Best Security + MGMT score of 100%! IPS Recommended – Nov 2013 100% Management score and Best annual Management Labor Cost NGFW Recommended – Feb 2013 Best Security + MGMT Score of 98.5%! NGFW Recommended – Sept 2014 4th NGFW Recommended BDS Recommended – Aug 2015 1st time tested - 100% unknown malware catch-rate NSS Labs- Check Point’s track record of security leadership and excellence! NGFW Recommended (follow-on test) – Aug 2018 Follow-on test - 99.62 overall Exploit Block-Rate AEP Recommended – March 2019 96.6 overall Block-Rate NGFW Recommended – Jul 2019 98.42 Exploit Catch-Rate BPS Recommended – Aug 2019 98.4 Security Effectiveness NGFW Recommended – Mar 2016 99.8% Catch rate and 5th NSS NGFW Recommended! BDS Recommended – Aug 2016 2nd NSS BDS Recommended! - 100% evasion free NGIPS Recommended – Oct 2016 Highest Catch-rate 99.95% lowest TCO NGFW Recommended – Jun 2017 99.56% overall Exploit Block-Rate BDS Recommended – Oct 2017 99.7% overall Breach Detection Score BPS Recommended – Dec 2017 Top Right Dot - 100% Block-rate Score AEP “AA” rating – Mar 2020 99.12 Block-Rate and #1 vendor in the test
  • 4. 4©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 1 3 18 12 CHECK POINT PROVEN TRACK RECORD OF SECURITY EXCELLENCE * Recommended: 18/19=95% Recommended: 63% [Protected] Distribution or modification is subject to approval Neutral Caution Recommended Source: http://tiny.cc/nss_stats NSS Labs Security tests (FW/NGFW/IPS/NGIPS/BDS/BPS/AEP) 2020 AEP A & AA rating considered as Recommended Based on NSS Labs tests where Check Point and Palo Alto Participated together 4
  • 5. 5©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 1 2 21 19 CHECK POINT PROVEN TRACK RECORD OF SECURITY EXCELLENCE Recommended: 21/22=95% Recommended: 86% [Protected] Distribution or modification is subject to approval Neutral Caution Recommended Source: http://tiny.cc/nss_stats NSS Labs Security tests (FW/NGFW/IPS/NGIPS/BDS/BPS/AEP) 2020 AEP A & AA rating considered as Recommended Based on NSS Labs test where Check Point and Fortinet Participated together 1
  • 6. 6©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 1 6 16 9 CHECK POINT PROVEN TRACK RECORD OF SECURITY EXCELLENCE * Recommended: 16/17=94% Recommended: 53% [Protected] Distribution or modification is subject to approval Neutral Caution Recommended Source: http://tiny.cc/nss_stats NSS Labs Security tests (FW/NGFW/IPS/NGIPS/BDS/BPS/AEP) AEP 2020 no report for cisco yet Based on NSS Labs tests where Check Point and Cisco Participated together 2
  • 7. 7©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 13 1 3 2 4 12 9 8 CHECK POINT PROVEN TRACK RECORD OF SECURITY EXCELLENCE * Recommended: 13/14=93% Recommended: 57% Recommended: 64% Recommended: 86% [Protected] Distribution or modification is subject to approval Neutral Caution Recommended Source: http://tiny.cc/nss_stats NSS Labs Security tests (FW/NGFW/IPS/NGIPS/BDS/BPS/AEP) Based on NSS Labs tests where all four vendors participated together 1 1 2
  • 8. 8©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 14 1 3 2 4 13 9 9 CHECK POINT PROVEN TRACK RECORD OF SECURITY EXCELLENCE * Recommended: 14/15=93% Recommended: 60% Recommended: 64% Recommended: 86% [Protected] Distribution or modification is subject to approval Neutral Caution Recommended Source: http://tiny.cc/nss_stats NSS Labs Security tests (FW/NGFW/IPS/NGIPS/BDS/BPS/AEP) 2020 AEP A & AA rating considered as Recommended Based on NSS Labs tests where all four vendors participated together 1 1 2
  • 9. ©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 9 Check Point SandBlast Recommended for Security Effectiveness and Value 2019 NSS Breach Prevention Systems Test ©2016 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 100% Block Rate 100% Protection against HTTP Malware 100% Protection against Email Malware 98.4% Overall Security Effectiveness 0.0% False Positives A Leading TCO: $19 Price/protected Mbps 100% Exploit Resistant 100% catch-rate in post infection
  • 10. 10©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. NSS Security Value Map Breach Prevention System (BPS) Test – 2019 Check Point comes out on top ! TCO per Protected Mbps SecurityEffectiveness 1 BPS 2 NGFW+AEP 3 NGIPS+AEP
  • 11. ©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 11 ©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 11 4512 4343 4152 3416 4284 1447 1177 1104 1177 1268 1554 1518 1801 1579 1112 # CVE's Microsoft CVE's Adobe CVE's Number of CVE’s covered by IPS (2014-2019) Last 5 Years Information is current as of Dec 2014 – Dec 22, 2019 | Source: Check Point Advisories| Palo Alto ThreatVault |Fortinet FortiGuard|Mcafee Threat Intelligence|Tipping Point Digital Vaccine|SourceFire Advisories
  • 12. ©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 12 ©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 12 4512 4343 1447 1177 1554 1518 # CVE's Microsoft CVE's Adobe CVE's Number of CVE’s covered by IPS(2015-2019): Check Point vs. Palo Alto Networks Last 5 Years Information is current as of Dec 2014 – Dec 2019 | Source: Palo Alto ThreatVault https://threatvault.paloaltonetworks.com/
  • 13. ©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 13 ©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 13 4512 4472 4222 1447 1541 # CVE's Strict Optimized Microsoft CVE's Adobe CVE's Number of CVE’s covered by IPS(Dec 2014-Dec 2019): Check Point Strict & Optimized vs. Palo Alto Networks “ALL Signatures” -Last 5 Years- Information is current as of Dec 2014 – Dec 2019 | Source: Palo Alto ThreatVault https://threatvault.paloaltonetworks.com/ 4343 1176 1518
  • 14. ©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 14 ©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 14 4512 4152 1447 1104 1541 1425 # CVE's Microsoft CVE's Adobe CVE's Number of CVE’s covered by IPS(2015-2019) Check Point vs. Fortinet Information is current as of Dec 13 2014 – Dec 13, 2019 | Source: FortiGuard Center https://fortiguard.com/updates/ips
  • 15. ©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 15 ©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 15 4512 4284 1447 1268 1541 1112 # CVE's Microsoft CVE's Adobe CVE's Number of CVE’s covered by IPS(2015-2019) Check Point vs. Cisco SourceFire Information is current as of Dec 13, 2014 – Dec 13, 2019 | Source: Cisco SourceFire Advisories http://www.snort.org/vrt/advisories/
  • 16. ©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 16 ©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 16 4512 3375 1447 13931541 1160 # CVE's Microsoft CVE's Adobe CVE's Number of CVE’s covered by IPS 2015-2019 Check Point vs. McAfee Information is current as of Dec 13 – Dec 13, 2019 | Source: McAfee Threat Intelligence http://www.mcafee.com/threat-intelligence/vulnerability/latest.aspx
  • 17. ©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 18 ©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 18 4512 4343 4152 4284 8012 3158 4200 3507 772 32 51 Check Point NGFW One Step Ahead – Visibility into risks Information of IPS is current as of Dec 13, 2014 – Dec 13, 2019 | Source: Check Point Advisories| Palo Alto ThreatVault |Fortinet FortiGuard|Mcafee Threat Intelligence|Tipping Point Digital Vaccine|SourceFire Advisories IPS - Total number of CVE’s covered Applications -Total number of Apps DLP – number of Data types (patterns, file types )
  • 18. ©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 19 Check Point One Step Ahead in Detection and Prevention of Threat Focused Apps [Internal Use] for Check Point employees​ Potentially Risky Apps Check Point Palo Alto Networks Fortinet Cisco # of Anonymizers proxy/tunnel apps (e.g. TOR, UltraSurf, HideMyAss…) 222 115 169 41 # of P2P apps (e.g. Bitorrent, WinMX…) 343 146 64 54 # of File sharing apps (e.g. Dropbox, Google Drive, Mega…) 945 348 178 155 # of Remote Admin apps (e.g. TeamViewer, LogMeIn…) 147 98 84 71 Total number of apps 8,067 3,197 4,090 3,528 Source: Check Point AppWiki, PAN Applipedia, Fortinet FortiGuard, Cisco FirePower , as of March 10, 2020 [Protected ] Non-confidential content
  • 19. ©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 20 Vendors Check Point R80.x Palo Alto Networks V9.x Fortinet v6 Cisco V6.2.1 IPS (CVEs covered) – Dec 2014-Dec 2019 4,512 4,343 4,152 4,284 Application Control 8,067 3,197 4,090 3,528 DLP File Types over 500 10 51 - Patterns 739 22 2 - URL Filtering Categories 164 71 88 84 [Protected ] Non-confidential content Source: Check Point AppWiki, ThreatWiki, PAN Applipedia, Threat Vault, PA-VM, Fortinet FortiGuard, FG-VM, Cisco FirePower , as of March 2020 Check Point One Step Ahead in Detection and Prevention of Threat Focused Apps
  • 20. 21©2020 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. Source: vendors security advisories web pages & http://tiny.cc/urgency TO MAKE SURE YOUR SYSTEMS ARE NOT EXPOSED… 172 94.5118 234 128 159 136.6 Total of SW Vulnerabilities(2016- 2019)Average fix time (days) Mature SW Code Swift response to SW vulnerabilities
  • 21. ©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 22 ©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 22 Source: vendors security advisories web pages & http://tiny.cc/urgency 109min TOP VULNERABILITIES AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME 108days 2days 64min 10days 54days 20min 2days 1day 3days 5days 6days 5days BlueKeep CVE-2019-0708
  • 22. ©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 23 ©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 23 9 hours Check Point Cisco 2 days Fortinet 5 days Heartbleed Shellshock Poodle-TLS Venom 22 hours Check Point 18 hours Check Point 30 hours Check Point Palo Alto 29 days Fortinet 14 days Palo Alto 56 days Fortinet 10 days Palo Alto 10 days Fortinet 9 days Sense of Urgency is in Our DNA Full references at http://tiny.cc/dna-cp
  • 23. ©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 24 ©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 24 Patch Tuesday 2015-2017 AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME FOR TOP VULNERABILITIES(IPS) Apache Struts 2 35 minutes Check Point Palo Alto 377 min. Cisco 110 min. 29 hours Check Point 13 hours Check Point Palo Alto 6 days Fortinet 4 days Palo Alto 22 hours Fortinet 44 hours Flash (0day) CVE-2017-11292 48 hours Check Point Palo Alto 12 days Fortinet 5 days Disdain EK CVE-2017-0037 CVE-2017-0059 CVE-2017-9805 CVE-2017-9791 Source: vendors security advisories web pages & http://tiny.cc/urgency
  • 24. ©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 25 ©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 25 Patch Tuesday 2015,2016 AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME FOR TOP VULNERABILITIES(IPS) SSL Drown Attack 50 minutes Check Point Palo Alto 900 min. Cisco 98 min. 0 hours Check Point 13 hours Check Point Palo Alto 10 days Fortinet 9 hours Palo Alto 5 days Fortinet 5 days Flash (In The Wild) 0days 2016 Full references at http://tiny.cc/dna-cp 11 Minutes Check Point Palo Alto 9 hours Fortinet 1 hour BADLOCK
  • 25. 26©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. Patch Tuesday 2017 AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME FOR TOP VULNERABILITIES(IPS) Apache Struts 2 40 minutes Check Point Palo Alto 8.3 Hours Cisco 110 min. 29 hours Check Point 43 minutes Check Point Palo Alto 6 days Fortinet 4 days Palo Alto 35 Days Fortinet 30 Days 48 hours Check Point Palo Alto 12 days Fortinet 5 days Disdain EK CVE-2017-0037 CVE-2017-0059 CVE-2017-9805 CVE-2017-9791 Source: vendors security advisories web pages & http://tiny.cc/urgency WannaCry & NotPetya Key Competitive Point: Such response time is unacceptable
  • 26. 27©2019 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. Patch Tuesday 2017 AVERAGE RESPONSE TIME FOR TOP VULNERABILITIES(IPS) 40 minutes Check Point Palo Alto 8.3 Hours Fortinet 3.6 hours. 12.3 hours Check Point 43 minutes Check Point Palo Alto 36.3 hours Fortinet 32 hours Palo Alto 30 Days Fortinet 30 Days CVE-2017-5753, CVE-2017-5715, CVE-2017-5754 WannaCry & NotPetya CVE-2017-0144 Apache Struts 2 29 hours Check Point Palo Alto 6 days Fortinet 4 days CVE-2017-9805 CVE-2017-9791

Editor's Notes

  1. Here is the complete record of our NSS Labs test participation. You can see in each instance we received NSS Labs’ highest award, NSS Recommended. In fact Check Point has received nine NSS Recommended awards since 2011. Every FW, IPS and NGFW test we’ve participated in, we’ve received NSS Recommended. Plus we conducted one Individual IPS test where we scored 99% Security Score – but NSS only grant “Recommended” as part of Group Tests – this was an Individual test on our 61000 appliance. Overall a truly exceptional record – that should help give you confidence in the quality of our products and the security we deliver – over the long term.
  2. Topic CVEs Covered by Check Point, but not covered by Palo Alto Covered by Palo Alto, but not covered by Check Point Covered by Check Point in Recommended, but not covered by Palo Alto Covered by Check Point with Critical performance impact Covered by Check Point with Critical performance impact, but not covered by Palo Alto
  3. Topic CVEs Covered by Check Point, but not covered by Palo Alto Covered by Palo Alto, but not covered by Check Point Covered by Check Point in Recommended, but not covered by Palo Alto Covered by Check Point with Critical performance impact Covered by Check Point with Critical performance impact, but not covered by Palo Alto
  4. Topic CVEs Covered by Check Point, but not covered by Palo Alto Covered by Palo Alto, but not covered by Check Point Covered by Check Point in Recommended, but not covered by Palo Alto Covered by Check Point with Critical performance impact Covered by Check Point with Critical performance impact, but not covered by Palo Alto
  5. Check Point: https://appwiki.checkpoint.com/appwikisdb/public.htm Palo Alto: https://applipedia.paloaltonetworks.com/ Fortinet: https://fortiguard.com/appcontrol Cisco: FP management -> Policies -> Application Detectors # of Anonymizers proxy/tunnel apps (e.g. TOR, UltraSurf, HideMyAss…) Check point: anonymizer PAN: proxy+encrypted-tunnel Fortinet:proxy Cisco: anonymizer/proxy category # of P2P apps CP: P2P file sharing PAN: “peer-to-peer” Technology Fortinet: “P2P” Cisco: peer-to-peer category # of File sharing apps CP: file storage and sharing category PAN: file sharing sub-category Fortinet: storage.backup Cisco: remote file storage category # of Remote Admin apps CP: remote administration category PAN: remote access subcategory Fortinet: remote access category Cisco: remote administration category
  6. Full Reference : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16kMzTF2xIlnzyrkGmKswnbR_qsMg4heO8aqzv4D3qTI/edit#gid=1963141070 # of vulnerabilities represent the sum of CVE’s + Internal vulnerabilities found in 2016 by each vendor. The list include vulnerabilities of all enterprise security products (network + endpoint security)
  7. Full reference patch teusday http://tiny.cc/urgency) BlueKeep CVE-2019-0708: publish date – May 16, 2019 Check Point – May 19, 2019 - https://www.checkpoint.com/defense/advisories/public/2019/cpai-2019-0657.html Palo Alto – May 21, 2019 – content version 8154 Fortinet – May 22, 2019 - https://fortiguard.com/search?q=CVE-2019-0708&engine=3 Cisco - May 21, 2019 https://blog.talosintelligence.com/2019/05/talos-releases-coverage-for-wormable.html Fragmentsmack: CVE-2018-5391 - used in FragmentSmack. Publication: August 14, 2018 Check Point released a fix (patch) on August 16, 2018 = 2 days (https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&solutionid=sk134253&src=securityAlerts) Palo Alto released advisory with “medium” severity that they are vulnerable and with fix in November 29, 2018 = 108 days (https://securityadvisories.paloaltonetworks.com/  PAN-SA-2018-0012) Cisco released a fix in August 24 @21:30 GMT = 10 days (https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/mpublicationListingDetails.x?pageNo=5&docType=CiscoSecurityAdvisory) SegmentSmack: CVE-2018-5390 & CVE-2018-6922 https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/962459/ and https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2018-5390 Published in Aug 6, 2018 (after embargo) Check Point Released a patch OS fix in August 16, 2018 = 10 days (https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&solutionid=sk134253&src=securityAlerts) Cisco released a fix in Cisco released a fix in August 24 @21:30 GMT (https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/mpublicationListingDetails.x?pageNo=5&docType=CiscoSecurityAdvisory) Palo Alto released “info” advisory, stating they are not vulnerable - in September 19, 2018 - (https://securityadvisories.paloaltonetworks.com/  PAN-SA-2018-0012) Struts2 2018 CVE-2018-11776 published in August 22, 2018 - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-11776 & https://semmle.com/news/apache-struts-CVE-2018-11776 Check Point published August 23, 2018 @ 18:22 GMT+2 PAN published in August 24, 2018 @20:43 (8:43pm) GMT+2 (pkg 8057) Cisco published in Aug 23, 2018 @21:29 GMT+2  https://www.snort.org/advisories/talos-rules-2018-08-23-8-23-2018 Fortinet published in Oct 15, 2018  https://fortiguard.com/encyclopedia/ips/30956/apache-struts-2-ognl-script-injection ===ALL TIMES ARE IST (GMT +2 with daylight) === Microsoft Patch Tuesday release dates :         Flash (In The Wild) 0days 2016 Check Point CVE-2016-1010 (http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/03/adobe-issues-emergency-patch-for-actively-exploited-code-execution-bug/) Mar 2016 update package 634161670 Thu 10-Mar-16 22:11   CVE-2016-1019 (https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsa16-01.html) Apr 2016 update package 634162315 Wed 06-Apr-16 19:12       Fortinet: CVE-2016-1010  http://fortiguard.com/updates/ips?version=7.813 (Mar 16th, 2016 - 10:37:11) CVE-2016-1019 http://fortiguard.com/updates/ips?version=7.829 ( Apr 08th, 2016 - 10:44:09) Palo Alto : CVE-2016-1010 Version 570 (Thu 3/17/2016 12:24 AM) CVE-2016-1019 Version 576 (Fri 4/8/2016 11:39 AM) BADLOCK Check Point Apr 2016 update package 634162437  Tue 12-Apr-16 20:14 ====> 11 Min. Palo Alto: Apr 2016 update package 578 Wed 4/12/2016 4:55 AM====> 532 Min Fortinet Update 7.831 Apr 12th, 2016 - 21:07:14=64 min
  8. Full references at http://tiny.cc/dna-cp
  9. ===ALL TIMES ARE IST (GMT +2 with daylight) === Microsoft Patch Tuesday release dates : Jan 2015  Tue 13-Jan-15 20:41 Feb 2015 Tue 10-Feb-15 20:23 Mar 2015 Tue 10-Mar-15 20:05 Apr 2015 Tue 14-Apr-15 20:11 May 2015 Tue 12-May-15 20:01 Jun 2015 Tue 09-Jun-15 20:11 Jul 2015 14-07-15 20:22 Aug 2015 Tue 11-Aug-15 20:13 Sept 2015 Tue 08-Sep-15 20:11 Oct 2015 Tue 13-Oct-15 20:02 Nov 2015 10-Nov-15 20:06 Dec 2015 08-Dec-15 20:21 Jan 2016 12-Jan-16 20:32 Feb 2016 09-Feb-16 20:11 Mar 2016 08-Mar-16 20:10 Apr 2016 12-Apr-16 20:03   Check Point: Jan 2015 update package 634150275  Tue 13-Jan-15 21:10 ====> 29 Min. Feb 2015 update package 634150971 Tue 10-Feb-15 20:44 ====> 21 Min. Mar 2015 update package 634151647 Tue 10-Mar-15 21:06 ====> 61 Min. Apr 2015 update package 634152477 Tue 14-Apr-15 20:32 ====> 21 Min. May 2015 update package 634153159 Tue 12-May-15 22:11 ====> 130 Min. Jun 2015 update package 634153827 Tue 09-Jun-15 20:41 ====> 30 Min. Jul 2015 update package 634154669 Tue 14-Jul-15 21:21 ====> 59 Min. Aug 2015 update package 634155315 Tue 11-Aug-15 20:34 ====> 21 Min. Sept 2015 update package 634156015 Tue 08-Sep-15 23:02 ====> 171 Min. Oct 2015 update package 634156850 Tue 13-Oct-15 20:21 ====> 19 Min. Nov 2015 update package 634157526 Tue 10-Nov-15 21:11 ====> 55 Min. Dec 2015 update package 634158204 Tue 08-Dec-15 22:11 ====> 110 Min. Jan 2016 update package 634150275 Tue 12-Jan-16 20:48 ====> 16 Min. Feb 2016 update package 634160946 Tue 09-Feb-16 20:31 ====> 20 Min. Mar 2016 update package 634161619 Tue 08-Mar-16 20:32 ====> 22 Min. Apr 2016 update package 634162437  Tue 12-Apr-16 20:14 ====> 11 Min.   Average for Check Point Patch Tuesday response time (Jan-2015 – Apr 2016 ): 50 minutes   Palo Alto Jan 2015 update package 481 Wed 1/14/2015 1:26 AM====> 285 Min. Feb 2015 update package 485 Wed 2/11/2015 2:00 AM====> 337 Min. Mar 2015 update package 490 Wed 3/11/2015 6:50 PM====> 1365 Min. Apr 2015 update package 495 Wed 4/15/2015 12:01 AM====> 230 Min. May 2015 update package 499 Wed 5/13/2015 8:18 AM====> 737 Min. Jun 2015 update package 504 Tue 6/9/2015 10:46 PM====> 95 Min. Jul 2015 update package 515 Thu, 7/16/2015 3:24 AM====> 1862 Min. Aug 2015 update package 521 Thu, 8/13/2015 7:11 PM====> 2818 Min. Sept 2015 update package 526 Wed, 9/9/2015 6:14 PM====> 1323 Min. Oct 2015 update package 533 Wed, 10/14/2015 7:38 AM====> 696 Min. Nov 2015 update package 539 Wed, 11/11/2015 10:16 AM====> 850 Min. Dec 2015 update package 544 Wed 12/9/2015 2:34 AM====> 373 Min. Jan 2016 update package 551 Tue 1/12/2016 10:25 PM====> 113 Min. Feb 2016 update package 557 Wed 2/10/2016 5:08 AM====> 537 Min. Mar 2016 update package 566 Thu 3/10/2016 0:03 AM====> 1793 Min. Apr 2016 update package 578 Wed 4/12/2016 4:55 AM====> 532 Min   Average for PAN Patch Tuesday response time (Jan-2015 – Apr 2016 ): 872 minutes (14h33m)   Cisco (https://www.snort.org/advisories/) : Jan 2015 VRT Rules 2015-01-13 2015-01-13 19:27:43 UTC====> 106 Min. Feb 2015 VRT Rules 2015-02-10 2015-02-10 18:23:34 UTC====> 60 Min. Mar 2015 VRT Rules 2015-03-10 2015-03-10 19:40:03 UTC====> 155 Min. Apr 2015 VRT Rules 2015-04-14 2015-04-14 17:46:40 UTC====> 35 Min. May 2015 Talos Rules 2015-05-12 2015-05-12 18:28:55 UTC====> 87 Min. Jun 2015 Talos Rules 2015-06-09 2015-06-09 17:25:03 UTC====> 14 Min. Jul 2015 Talos Rules 2015-07-14 2015-07-14 17:51:25 UTC====> 31 Min. Aug 2015 Talos Rules 2015-08-11 2015-08-11 17:55:32 UTC34 ====> 42 Min. Sept 2015 Talos Rules 2015-09-08 2015-09-08 18:14:21 UTC====> 63 Min. Oct 2015 Talos Rules 2015-10-13 2015-10-13 19:03:24 UTC====> 121 Min. Nov 2015 Talos Rules 2015-11-10 2015-11-10 19:54:08 UTC ====> 168 Min. Dec 2015 Talos Rules 2015-12-08 2015-12-08 22:03:06 UTC====> 282 Min. Jan 2016 Talos Rules 2016-01-12 2016-01-12 19:05:37 UTC====> 153 Min. Feb 2016 Talos Rules 2016-02-09 2016-02-09 19:15:02 UTC ====>124 min Mar 2016 Talos Rules 2016-03-08 2016-03-08 18:21:55 UTC====> 61 Min. Apr 2016 Talos Rules 2016-04-12 2016-04-12 19:06:33 UTC ====> 63 Min     Average for Cisco Patch Tuesday response time (Jan-2015 – Apr 2016 ): 98 minutes (1h38m)   SSL Drown Attack Check Point : proactively protecting with signature “Secure Sockets Layer Version 2.0” see also sk92447 Palo Alto : Version 567  Thursday, March 10, 2016 at 9:16 PM Fortinet:  http://fortiguard.com/updates/ips?version=7.802 Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 11:26 PM       Flash (In The Wild) 0days 2016 Check Point CVE-2016-1010 (http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/03/adobe-issues-emergency-patch-for-actively-exploited-code-execution-bug/) Mar 2016 update package 634161670 Thu 10-Mar-16 22:11   CVE-2016-1019 (https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsa16-01.html) Apr 2016 update package 634162315 Wed 06-Apr-16 19:12       Fortinet: CVE-2016-1010  http://fortiguard.com/updates/ips?version=7.813 (Mar 16th, 2016 - 10:37:11) CVE-2016-1019 http://fortiguard.com/updates/ips?version=7.829 ( Apr 08th, 2016 - 10:44:09) Palo Alto : CVE-2016-1010 Version 570 (Thu 3/17/2016 12:24 AM) CVE-2016-1019 Version 576 (Fri 4/8/2016 11:39 AM) BADLOCK Check Point Apr 2016 update package 634162437  Tue 12-Apr-16 20:14 ====> 11 Min. Palo Alto: Apr 2016 update package 578 Wed 4/12/2016 4:55 AM====> 532 Min Fortinet Update 7.831 Apr 12th, 2016 - 21:07:14=64 min
  10. ===ALL TIMES ARE IST (GMT +2 with daylight) === Microsoft Patch Tuesday release dates : Jan 2015  Tue 13-Jan-15 20:41 Feb 2015 Tue 10-Feb-15 20:23 Mar 2015 Tue 10-Mar-15 20:05 Apr 2015 Tue 14-Apr-15 20:11 May 2015 Tue 12-May-15 20:01 Jun 2015 Tue 09-Jun-15 20:11 Jul 2015 14-07-15 20:22 Aug 2015 Tue 11-Aug-15 20:13 Sept 2015 Tue 08-Sep-15 20:11 Oct 2015 Tue 13-Oct-15 20:02 Nov 2015 10-Nov-15 20:06 Dec 2015 08-Dec-15 20:21 Jan 2016 12-Jan-16 20:32 Feb 2016 09-Feb-16 20:11 Mar 2016 08-Mar-16 20:10 Apr 2016 12-Apr-16 20:03   Check Point: Jan 2015 update package 634150275  Tue 13-Jan-15 21:10 ====> 29 Min. Feb 2015 update package 634150971 Tue 10-Feb-15 20:44 ====> 21 Min. Mar 2015 update package 634151647 Tue 10-Mar-15 21:06 ====> 61 Min. Apr 2015 update package 634152477 Tue 14-Apr-15 20:32 ====> 21 Min. May 2015 update package 634153159 Tue 12-May-15 22:11 ====> 130 Min. Jun 2015 update package 634153827 Tue 09-Jun-15 20:41 ====> 30 Min. Jul 2015 update package 634154669 Tue 14-Jul-15 21:21 ====> 59 Min. Aug 2015 update package 634155315 Tue 11-Aug-15 20:34 ====> 21 Min. Sept 2015 update package 634156015 Tue 08-Sep-15 23:02 ====> 171 Min. Oct 2015 update package 634156850 Tue 13-Oct-15 20:21 ====> 19 Min. Nov 2015 update package 634157526 Tue 10-Nov-15 21:11 ====> 55 Min. Dec 2015 update package 634158204 Tue 08-Dec-15 22:11 ====> 110 Min. Jan 2016 update package 634150275 Tue 12-Jan-16 20:48 ====> 16 Min. Feb 2016 update package 634160946 Tue 09-Feb-16 20:31 ====> 20 Min. Mar 2016 update package 634161619 Tue 08-Mar-16 20:32 ====> 22 Min. Apr 2016 update package 634162437  Tue 12-Apr-16 20:14 ====> 11 Min.   Average for Check Point Patch Tuesday response time (Jan-2015 – Apr 2016 ): 50 minutes   Palo Alto Jan 2015 update package 481 Wed 1/14/2015 1:26 AM====> 285 Min. Feb 2015 update package 485 Wed 2/11/2015 2:00 AM====> 337 Min. Mar 2015 update package 490 Wed 3/11/2015 6:50 PM====> 1365 Min. Apr 2015 update package 495 Wed 4/15/2015 12:01 AM====> 230 Min. May 2015 update package 499 Wed 5/13/2015 8:18 AM====> 737 Min. Jun 2015 update package 504 Tue 6/9/2015 10:46 PM====> 95 Min. Jul 2015 update package 515 Thu, 7/16/2015 3:24 AM====> 1862 Min. Aug 2015 update package 521 Thu, 8/13/2015 7:11 PM====> 2818 Min. Sept 2015 update package 526 Wed, 9/9/2015 6:14 PM====> 1323 Min. Oct 2015 update package 533 Wed, 10/14/2015 7:38 AM====> 696 Min. Nov 2015 update package 539 Wed, 11/11/2015 10:16 AM====> 850 Min. Dec 2015 update package 544 Wed 12/9/2015 2:34 AM====> 373 Min. Jan 2016 update package 551 Tue 1/12/2016 10:25 PM====> 113 Min. Feb 2016 update package 557 Wed 2/10/2016 5:08 AM====> 537 Min. Mar 2016 update package 566 Thu 3/10/2016 0:03 AM====> 1793 Min. Apr 2016 update package 578 Wed 4/12/2016 4:55 AM====> 532 Min   Average for PAN Patch Tuesday response time (Jan-2015 – Apr 2016 ): 872 minutes (14h33m)   Cisco (https://www.snort.org/advisories/) : Jan 2015 VRT Rules 2015-01-13 2015-01-13 19:27:43 UTC====> 106 Min. Feb 2015 VRT Rules 2015-02-10 2015-02-10 18:23:34 UTC====> 60 Min. Mar 2015 VRT Rules 2015-03-10 2015-03-10 19:40:03 UTC====> 155 Min. Apr 2015 VRT Rules 2015-04-14 2015-04-14 17:46:40 UTC====> 35 Min. May 2015 Talos Rules 2015-05-12 2015-05-12 18:28:55 UTC====> 87 Min. Jun 2015 Talos Rules 2015-06-09 2015-06-09 17:25:03 UTC====> 14 Min. Jul 2015 Talos Rules 2015-07-14 2015-07-14 17:51:25 UTC====> 31 Min. Aug 2015 Talos Rules 2015-08-11 2015-08-11 17:55:32 UTC34 ====> 42 Min. Sept 2015 Talos Rules 2015-09-08 2015-09-08 18:14:21 UTC====> 63 Min. Oct 2015 Talos Rules 2015-10-13 2015-10-13 19:03:24 UTC====> 121 Min. Nov 2015 Talos Rules 2015-11-10 2015-11-10 19:54:08 UTC ====> 168 Min. Dec 2015 Talos Rules 2015-12-08 2015-12-08 22:03:06 UTC====> 282 Min. Jan 2016 Talos Rules 2016-01-12 2016-01-12 19:05:37 UTC====> 153 Min. Feb 2016 Talos Rules 2016-02-09 2016-02-09 19:15:02 UTC ====>124 min Mar 2016 Talos Rules 2016-03-08 2016-03-08 18:21:55 UTC====> 61 Min. Apr 2016 Talos Rules 2016-04-12 2016-04-12 19:06:33 UTC ====> 63 Min     Average for Cisco Patch Tuesday response time (Jan-2015 – Apr 2016 ): 98 minutes (1h38m)   SSL Drown Attack Check Point : proactively protecting with signature “Secure Sockets Layer Version 2.0” see also sk92447 Palo Alto : Version 567  Thursday, March 10, 2016 at 9:16 PM Fortinet:  http://fortiguard.com/updates/ips?version=7.802 Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 11:26 PM       Flash (In The Wild) 0days 2016 Check Point CVE-2016-1010 (http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/03/adobe-issues-emergency-patch-for-actively-exploited-code-execution-bug/) Mar 2016 update package 634161670 Thu 10-Mar-16 22:11   CVE-2016-1019 (https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsa16-01.html) Apr 2016 update package 634162315 Wed 06-Apr-16 19:12       Fortinet: CVE-2016-1010  http://fortiguard.com/updates/ips?version=7.813 (Mar 16th, 2016 - 10:37:11) CVE-2016-1019 http://fortiguard.com/updates/ips?version=7.829 ( Apr 08th, 2016 - 10:44:09) Palo Alto : CVE-2016-1010 Version 570 (Thu 3/17/2016 12:24 AM) CVE-2016-1019 Version 576 (Fri 4/8/2016 11:39 AM) BADLOCK Check Point Apr 2016 update package 634162437  Tue 12-Apr-16 20:14 ====> 11 Min. Palo Alto: Apr 2016 update package 578 Wed 4/12/2016 4:55 AM====> 532 Min Fortinet Update 7.831 Apr 12th, 2016 - 21:07:14=64 min
  11. Full reference patch teusday http://tiny.cc/urgency WannaCry CVEs (eternalblue) were announces much earlier then actual outbreak. (Microsoft notified everyone on patch Tuesday of March 14, 2017 @ 7:19pm) CVE-2017-0144 - used in both WannaCry and Not-Petya (not-petya is a new variant of wannacry) CVE-2017-0146 ===ALL TIMES ARE IST (GMT +2 with daylight) === Microsoft Patch Tuesday release dates : Jan 2015  Tue 13-Jan-15 20:41 Feb 2015 Tue 10-Feb-15 20:23 Mar 2015 Tue 10-Mar-15 20:05 Apr 2015 Tue 14-Apr-15 20:11 May 2015 Tue 12-May-15 20:01 Jun 2015 Tue 09-Jun-15 20:11 Jul 2015 14-07-15 20:22 Aug 2015 Tue 11-Aug-15 20:13 Sept 2015 Tue 08-Sep-15 20:11 Oct 2015 Tue 13-Oct-15 20:02 Nov 2015 10-Nov-15 20:06 Dec 2015 08-Dec-15 20:21 Jan 2016 12-Jan-16 20:32 Feb 2016 09-Feb-16 20:11 Mar 2016 08-Mar-16 20:10 Apr 2016 12-Apr-16 20:03   Check Point: Jan 2015 update package 634150275  Tue 13-Jan-15 21:10 ====> 29 Min. Feb 2015 update package 634150971 Tue 10-Feb-15 20:44 ====> 21 Min. Mar 2015 update package 634151647 Tue 10-Mar-15 21:06 ====> 61 Min. Apr 2015 update package 634152477 Tue 14-Apr-15 20:32 ====> 21 Min. May 2015 update package 634153159 Tue 12-May-15 22:11 ====> 130 Min. Jun 2015 update package 634153827 Tue 09-Jun-15 20:41 ====> 30 Min. Jul 2015 update package 634154669 Tue 14-Jul-15 21:21 ====> 59 Min. Aug 2015 update package 634155315 Tue 11-Aug-15 20:34 ====> 21 Min. Sept 2015 update package 634156015 Tue 08-Sep-15 23:02 ====> 171 Min. Oct 2015 update package 634156850 Tue 13-Oct-15 20:21 ====> 19 Min. Nov 2015 update package 634157526 Tue 10-Nov-15 21:11 ====> 55 Min. Dec 2015 update package 634158204 Tue 08-Dec-15 22:11 ====> 110 Min. Jan 2016 update package 634150275 Tue 12-Jan-16 20:48 ====> 16 Min. Feb 2016 update package 634160946 Tue 09-Feb-16 20:31 ====> 20 Min. Mar 2016 update package 634161619 Tue 08-Mar-16 20:32 ====> 22 Min. Apr 2016 update package 634162437  Tue 12-Apr-16 20:14 ====> 11 Min.   Average for Check Point Patch Tuesday response time (Jan-2015 – Apr 2016 ): 50 minutes   Palo Alto Jan 2015 update package 481 Wed 1/14/2015 1:26 AM====> 285 Min. Feb 2015 update package 485 Wed 2/11/2015 2:00 AM====> 337 Min. Mar 2015 update package 490 Wed 3/11/2015 6:50 PM====> 1365 Min. Apr 2015 update package 495 Wed 4/15/2015 12:01 AM====> 230 Min. May 2015 update package 499 Wed 5/13/2015 8:18 AM====> 737 Min. Jun 2015 update package 504 Tue 6/9/2015 10:46 PM====> 95 Min. Jul 2015 update package 515 Thu, 7/16/2015 3:24 AM====> 1862 Min. Aug 2015 update package 521 Thu, 8/13/2015 7:11 PM====> 2818 Min. Sept 2015 update package 526 Wed, 9/9/2015 6:14 PM====> 1323 Min. Oct 2015 update package 533 Wed, 10/14/2015 7:38 AM====> 696 Min. Nov 2015 update package 539 Wed, 11/11/2015 10:16 AM====> 850 Min. Dec 2015 update package 544 Wed 12/9/2015 2:34 AM====> 373 Min. Jan 2016 update package 551 Tue 1/12/2016 10:25 PM====> 113 Min. Feb 2016 update package 557 Wed 2/10/2016 5:08 AM====> 537 Min. Mar 2016 update package 566 Thu 3/10/2016 0:03 AM====> 1793 Min. Apr 2016 update package 578 Wed 4/12/2016 4:55 AM====> 532 Min   Average for PAN Patch Tuesday response time (Jan-2015 – Apr 2016 ): 872 minutes (14h33m)   Cisco (https://www.snort.org/advisories/) : Jan 2015 VRT Rules 2015-01-13 2015-01-13 19:27:43 UTC====> 106 Min. Feb 2015 VRT Rules 2015-02-10 2015-02-10 18:23:34 UTC====> 60 Min. Mar 2015 VRT Rules 2015-03-10 2015-03-10 19:40:03 UTC====> 155 Min. Apr 2015 VRT Rules 2015-04-14 2015-04-14 17:46:40 UTC====> 35 Min. May 2015 Talos Rules 2015-05-12 2015-05-12 18:28:55 UTC====> 87 Min. Jun 2015 Talos Rules 2015-06-09 2015-06-09 17:25:03 UTC====> 14 Min. Jul 2015 Talos Rules 2015-07-14 2015-07-14 17:51:25 UTC====> 31 Min. Aug 2015 Talos Rules 2015-08-11 2015-08-11 17:55:32 UTC34 ====> 42 Min. Sept 2015 Talos Rules 2015-09-08 2015-09-08 18:14:21 UTC====> 63 Min. Oct 2015 Talos Rules 2015-10-13 2015-10-13 19:03:24 UTC====> 121 Min. Nov 2015 Talos Rules 2015-11-10 2015-11-10 19:54:08 UTC ====> 168 Min. Dec 2015 Talos Rules 2015-12-08 2015-12-08 22:03:06 UTC====> 282 Min. Jan 2016 Talos Rules 2016-01-12 2016-01-12 19:05:37 UTC====> 153 Min. Feb 2016 Talos Rules 2016-02-09 2016-02-09 19:15:02 UTC ====>124 min Mar 2016 Talos Rules 2016-03-08 2016-03-08 18:21:55 UTC====> 61 Min. Apr 2016 Talos Rules 2016-04-12 2016-04-12 19:06:33 UTC ====> 63 Min     Average for Cisco Patch Tuesday response time (Jan-2015 – Apr 2016 ): 98 minutes (1h38m)   SSL Drown Attack Check Point : proactively protecting with signature “Secure Sockets Layer Version 2.0” see also sk92447 Palo Alto : Version 567  Thursday, March 10, 2016 at 9:16 PM Fortinet:  http://fortiguard.com/updates/ips?version=7.802 Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 11:26 PM       Flash (In The Wild) 0days 2016 Check Point CVE-2016-1010 (http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/03/adobe-issues-emergency-patch-for-actively-exploited-code-execution-bug/) Mar 2016 update package 634161670 Thu 10-Mar-16 22:11   CVE-2016-1019 (https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsa16-01.html) Apr 2016 update package 634162315 Wed 06-Apr-16 19:12       Fortinet: CVE-2016-1010  http://fortiguard.com/updates/ips?version=7.813 (Mar 16th, 2016 - 10:37:11) CVE-2016-1019 http://fortiguard.com/updates/ips?version=7.829 ( Apr 08th, 2016 - 10:44:09) Palo Alto : CVE-2016-1010 Version 570 (Thu 3/17/2016 12:24 AM) CVE-2016-1019 Version 576 (Fri 4/8/2016 11:39 AM) BADLOCK Check Point Apr 2016 update package 634162437  Tue 12-Apr-16 20:14 ====> 11 Min. Palo Alto: Apr 2016 update package 578 Wed 4/12/2016 4:55 AM====> 532 Min Fortinet Update 7.831 Apr 12th, 2016 - 21:07:14=64 min
  12. Full reference patch teusday http://tiny.cc/urgency WannaCry CVEs (eternalblue) were announces much earlier then actual outbreak. (Microsoft notified everyone on patch Tuesday of March 14, 2017 @ 7:19pm) CVE-2017-0144 - used in both WannaCry and Not-Petya (not-petya is a new variant of wannacry) CVE-2017-0146 meltdown/spectre: CVE-2017-5753, CVE-2017-5715, CVE-2017-5754 First javascript POC publication time stamp in Jan 4, 2018 @11:48am GMT+2 : https://www.reddit.com/r/webdev/comments/7o1zkp/exploiting_speculative_execution_meltdownspectre/ Check Point published signatures: Jan 5, 2018 @12:14am GMT+2 PAN published signatures: Jan 6, 2018 @12:24am GMT+2 Fortinet published signatures: Jan 5th 10:51pm PDT which is 8:51 GMT+2 ===ALL TIMES ARE IST (GMT +2 with daylight) === Microsoft Patch Tuesday release dates : Jan 2015  Tue 13-Jan-15 20:41 Feb 2015 Tue 10-Feb-15 20:23 Mar 2015 Tue 10-Mar-15 20:05 Apr 2015 Tue 14-Apr-15 20:11 May 2015 Tue 12-May-15 20:01 Jun 2015 Tue 09-Jun-15 20:11 Jul 2015 14-07-15 20:22 Aug 2015 Tue 11-Aug-15 20:13 Sept 2015 Tue 08-Sep-15 20:11 Oct 2015 Tue 13-Oct-15 20:02 Nov 2015 10-Nov-15 20:06 Dec 2015 08-Dec-15 20:21 Jan 2016 12-Jan-16 20:32 Feb 2016 09-Feb-16 20:11 Mar 2016 08-Mar-16 20:10 Apr 2016 12-Apr-16 20:03   Check Point: Jan 2015 update package 634150275  Tue 13-Jan-15 21:10 ====> 29 Min. Feb 2015 update package 634150971 Tue 10-Feb-15 20:44 ====> 21 Min. Mar 2015 update package 634151647 Tue 10-Mar-15 21:06 ====> 61 Min. Apr 2015 update package 634152477 Tue 14-Apr-15 20:32 ====> 21 Min. May 2015 update package 634153159 Tue 12-May-15 22:11 ====> 130 Min. Jun 2015 update package 634153827 Tue 09-Jun-15 20:41 ====> 30 Min. Jul 2015 update package 634154669 Tue 14-Jul-15 21:21 ====> 59 Min. Aug 2015 update package 634155315 Tue 11-Aug-15 20:34 ====> 21 Min. Sept 2015 update package 634156015 Tue 08-Sep-15 23:02 ====> 171 Min. Oct 2015 update package 634156850 Tue 13-Oct-15 20:21 ====> 19 Min. Nov 2015 update package 634157526 Tue 10-Nov-15 21:11 ====> 55 Min. Dec 2015 update package 634158204 Tue 08-Dec-15 22:11 ====> 110 Min. Jan 2016 update package 634150275 Tue 12-Jan-16 20:48 ====> 16 Min. Feb 2016 update package 634160946 Tue 09-Feb-16 20:31 ====> 20 Min. Mar 2016 update package 634161619 Tue 08-Mar-16 20:32 ====> 22 Min. Apr 2016 update package 634162437  Tue 12-Apr-16 20:14 ====> 11 Min.   Average for Check Point Patch Tuesday response time (Jan-2015 – Apr 2016 ): 50 minutes   Palo Alto Jan 2015 update package 481 Wed 1/14/2015 1:26 AM====> 285 Min. Feb 2015 update package 485 Wed 2/11/2015 2:00 AM====> 337 Min. Mar 2015 update package 490 Wed 3/11/2015 6:50 PM====> 1365 Min. Apr 2015 update package 495 Wed 4/15/2015 12:01 AM====> 230 Min. May 2015 update package 499 Wed 5/13/2015 8:18 AM====> 737 Min. Jun 2015 update package 504 Tue 6/9/2015 10:46 PM====> 95 Min. Jul 2015 update package 515 Thu, 7/16/2015 3:24 AM====> 1862 Min. Aug 2015 update package 521 Thu, 8/13/2015 7:11 PM====> 2818 Min. Sept 2015 update package 526 Wed, 9/9/2015 6:14 PM====> 1323 Min. Oct 2015 update package 533 Wed, 10/14/2015 7:38 AM====> 696 Min. Nov 2015 update package 539 Wed, 11/11/2015 10:16 AM====> 850 Min. Dec 2015 update package 544 Wed 12/9/2015 2:34 AM====> 373 Min. Jan 2016 update package 551 Tue 1/12/2016 10:25 PM====> 113 Min. Feb 2016 update package 557 Wed 2/10/2016 5:08 AM====> 537 Min. Mar 2016 update package 566 Thu 3/10/2016 0:03 AM====> 1793 Min. Apr 2016 update package 578 Wed 4/12/2016 4:55 AM====> 532 Min   Average for PAN Patch Tuesday response time (Jan-2015 – Apr 2016 ): 872 minutes (14h33m)   Cisco (https://www.snort.org/advisories/) : Jan 2015 VRT Rules 2015-01-13 2015-01-13 19:27:43 UTC====> 106 Min. Feb 2015 VRT Rules 2015-02-10 2015-02-10 18:23:34 UTC====> 60 Min. Mar 2015 VRT Rules 2015-03-10 2015-03-10 19:40:03 UTC====> 155 Min. Apr 2015 VRT Rules 2015-04-14 2015-04-14 17:46:40 UTC====> 35 Min. May 2015 Talos Rules 2015-05-12 2015-05-12 18:28:55 UTC====> 87 Min. Jun 2015 Talos Rules 2015-06-09 2015-06-09 17:25:03 UTC====> 14 Min. Jul 2015 Talos Rules 2015-07-14 2015-07-14 17:51:25 UTC====> 31 Min. Aug 2015 Talos Rules 2015-08-11 2015-08-11 17:55:32 UTC34 ====> 42 Min. Sept 2015 Talos Rules 2015-09-08 2015-09-08 18:14:21 UTC====> 63 Min. Oct 2015 Talos Rules 2015-10-13 2015-10-13 19:03:24 UTC====> 121 Min. Nov 2015 Talos Rules 2015-11-10 2015-11-10 19:54:08 UTC ====> 168 Min. Dec 2015 Talos Rules 2015-12-08 2015-12-08 22:03:06 UTC====> 282 Min. Jan 2016 Talos Rules 2016-01-12 2016-01-12 19:05:37 UTC====> 153 Min. Feb 2016 Talos Rules 2016-02-09 2016-02-09 19:15:02 UTC ====>124 min Mar 2016 Talos Rules 2016-03-08 2016-03-08 18:21:55 UTC====> 61 Min. Apr 2016 Talos Rules 2016-04-12 2016-04-12 19:06:33 UTC ====> 63 Min     Average for Cisco Patch Tuesday response time (Jan-2015 – Apr 2016 ): 98 minutes (1h38m)   SSL Drown Attack Check Point : proactively protecting with signature “Secure Sockets Layer Version 2.0” see also sk92447 Palo Alto : Version 567  Thursday, March 10, 2016 at 9:16 PM Fortinet:  http://fortiguard.com/updates/ips?version=7.802 Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 11:26 PM       Flash (In The Wild) 0days 2016 Check Point CVE-2016-1010 (http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/03/adobe-issues-emergency-patch-for-actively-exploited-code-execution-bug/) Mar 2016 update package 634161670 Thu 10-Mar-16 22:11   CVE-2016-1019 (https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsa16-01.html) Apr 2016 update package 634162315 Wed 06-Apr-16 19:12       Fortinet: CVE-2016-1010  http://fortiguard.com/updates/ips?version=7.813 (Mar 16th, 2016 - 10:37:11) CVE-2016-1019 http://fortiguard.com/updates/ips?version=7.829 ( Apr 08th, 2016 - 10:44:09) Palo Alto : CVE-2016-1010 Version 570 (Thu 3/17/2016 12:24 AM) CVE-2016-1019 Version 576 (Fri 4/8/2016 11:39 AM) BADLOCK Check Point Apr 2016 update package 634162437  Tue 12-Apr-16 20:14 ====> 11 Min. Palo Alto: Apr 2016 update package 578 Wed 4/12/2016 4:55 AM====> 532 Min Fortinet Update 7.831 Apr 12th, 2016 - 21:07:14=64 min